MD04 consumption error.

Through our forward consumption is set to 2 days in future and 10days in past, in MD04 its consuming 6 days in the future. Consumption mode is set to 2 (forward and backward) How to resolve this issue. Any help is appreciated.
thx
Jeff

Dear Jeff,
Since you have maintained the consumption mode as 4 - Forward/Backward Consumption,
Forwards/backwards consumption
Starting from the requirements date, forward consumption is performed first of all. Then, if no independent requirements can be
allocated after the requirements date, backwards consumption is performed. Both procedures are carried out for the relevant
consumption period.
Check this link,
http://help.sap.com/saphelperp60_sp/helpdata/EN/93/744ca0546011d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm_
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Similar Messages

MM03 - Material Master Consumption Error

Hi,
We are now moving into the ECC 6.0 version from 4.6C version. During testing in the upgrade test system of ECC 6.0 environment, we identified a particular issue.
In the material master change / display if we select BASIC DATA 1 view and enter into the ADDITIONAL DATA and then select the Consumption TAB system is deflecting back to the basic data 1 screen with an error message "Fiscal year variant is not maintained for the calendar year 2003".
We are able to edit / view the consumption details for the materials (being used since 2001) in our 4.6C system.
When the Technical team tried to trace the difference between the 4.6C and the upgraded ECC env test system, they were able to identify an additional coding that checks the fiscal year variant and periods assigned to the fiscal years.
The code simply checks the current period and fiscal year and if it is less than the number of periods, it will continue to the previous period and so on.
Now we have an issue where we had periods defined upto 13 for the fiscal years 2001, 2002 and 2003 (during that time the fiscal variant used to be week based year and now it is period based year dependent variant from 2004 with only 12 periods.
Hence the system is checking the period number and if it is less than or equal to the total number of periods 12, it will continue into the consumption tab, or otherwise it will pop the error "FISCAL YEAR VARIANT IS NOT MAINTAINED FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2003".
Please advice if anyone else had got into a similar situation involving this issue
Thanks
Alluri Venkat

HI Anand,
I am going to assume that the problem is with F4 help in general, and not just with MM03.
If you have only one user with the problem, then the best way to troubleshoot is to compare with another user who is not having the same problem (like yourself).
First check Help settings for the user: From any screen, select Help>Settings select F4 tab. Review the settings. Look for differences. Make corrections. Save.
If you can find nothing amiss, then the GUI is probably the culprit. Check to see if this user is on the same version and patch as the 'successful' users. From SAPLOGON, select the tiny SAP icon from the blue bar, then select 'About SAP logon'. Alternately, you can right clik on the SAPLOGON on the Windows taskbar and select 'About SAP Logon'.
There are known problems of bad interactions between certain Microsoft Software and certain patches of SAPGUI. If any problems, download the latest GUI version and patch from SAP software distribution Center
http://service.sap.com/swdc
Select Download>Support packages and Patches>Entry by Application group
Select SAP frontend components.
Select the appropriate platform, then download the version that you need.
If the user is on the same vers & patch as you, and you can't find any other problem, might be a good idea to reinstall the SAPGUI.
Regards,
DB49

JMS Adapter Consumption Error

Hi All,
We are getting the below error while trying to consume the JMS Message from the queue. The instance itself is not created.
The Error Message is as follows:
+"Non Recoverable System Fault :+
+Failed to create Translator. Expected "startsWith" or "lookAhead" with "lookFor" at <element name="ODErrorLogger">, but not found. Must specify "startsWith" or "lookAhead" with "lookFor" at <element name="XXXXX">, because this particle is within "choice" model group."+
When i click on the payload viewing option in the error message i get the boxes and some special symbols.
Kindly do help us resove the same.
Regards,
Balaji R

Hi,
You have a XSD for translating native format... The translator is not able to understand your xsd...
What's your message format, xsd and expected result?
Cheers,
Vlad

Material Consumption error-In Repititive manufacturing

Dear all,
While doing MFBF,one of the raw material was not get consumed.
For that material,stock is available.
But still that particular raw material was not get consumed.
Kindly let me know
Regards
Rajasekaran

Dear Prashant,
While doing Post goods with corrections its showed all the three material was available.
But after goods movements it doesn't show ant error message,while checking the material documents in table only two materials was get consumed.
Regards
Rajasekaran

Material consumption error

Dear all,
Kindly find below image
Last month we have confirmed one production order.
In that RM01111 mat consumed only 310 quantity but actual quantity want to be consumed as 2250
I checked in BOM also the base quantity is 1
Kindly clarify on this
Regards
Rajasekaran

Dear all,
Finally we have found.
POSTING ONLY POSSIBLE IN PR01-This is the error message we have customized very long back.
But that end user post the stock in RM01 storage location.
Finally what he had done is when he put RM01 storage location,it show the error POSTING ONLY POSSIBLE IN PR01 as per what we have customized but after that he pressed esc button it comes back to main screen (i.e co11n confirmation screen).In that screen he clicked on confirmation button
it showed pop up message,Do you want to still save the confirmation,so he clicked ok and confirmation was saved.
So now we have changed the logic that apart from PRO1 if any other storage location has entered goods movement will get terminated.
Thanks & Regards
Rajasekaran

Forecast Consumption Error

Hello,
We are in make-to-order scenario, wherein the Sales Order has "BOM items" as line items. But we have make-to-stock scenario for component items. So when we create a Sales order with a BOM item in SAP R/3, dependent demand is created in SAP APO for the BOM item. Currently the requirement strategy we use in APO is planning with final assembly (20).
Suppose I release 100 forecast quantity from DP to SNP in the current time bucket (07/30/2007), and I create a Sales Order in R/3 for quantity of 10 for the BOM item on monday (07/30/2007), dependent demand 10 is created in the current time bucket in SNP. The situation looks like this in SNP before Sales order is created for a quantity of 10:
Scenario 1:
07/30/2007:
Forecast :          100
Depend Demand: 0
Total Demand:     100
After Sales order for a quantity of 10 created:
Scenario 2:
07/30/2007:
Forecast :          90
Depend Demand: 10
Total Demand:     100
Now when I process my sales order completely in the system and post good issue in R3, the situation should look like:
Scenario 3:
07/30/2007:
Forecast :          90
Depend Demand: 0
Total Demand:     90
But the Situation is still looks like:
Scenario 4:
07/30/2007:
Forecast :          100
Depend Demand: 0
Total Demand:     100
Can someone please let me know, why I am not getting scenario 3?
Thanks in advance,
Venkat.

Hi Venkat,
As i understood from your post, after servicing the salesorder, Forecast is bouncing back.
We have the same problem, but after selecting "Req Reduction" in salesorder integration model, we got consumed forecast ( delivered quantity in salesorder ) as withdrawl quantity.
Then your scenario will be like this.
Scenario 3:
07/30/2007:
Forecast : 90
Depend Demand: 0
Total Demand: 90
Also, add ATP category for delivery ( BR ), in salesorders consumption category group ( K01).
Tyr this and let me know.
Regards,
Jagadeesh.
Pls reward points, if it is helpful...

Cost Center Assessment to Cost Hierarchy based on Actual Consumption error

Assessment is set up:
SENDER: Cost Center: Overhead Expenses (values in expense accounts)
RECEIVER: Top Node of Cost Object Hierarchy (material consumption has been posted to two objects - related account has value and quantity fields)
Segment is set up:
Sender Rules: Posted Amounts
Share:100%
Actual value origin
Receiving tracing factor:
Receiver rule: Variable Portions
Var. portion type: Actual Consumption
No Scaling
Assumption is that "Var. portion type: Actual Consumptions" means the quantity in the consumption account on the receiver from the inventory posting. Is this true?
Edited by: Chris Gibson on Apr 13, 2010 11:56 PM

Hi dear Ajay, thank you for your answer.
first, I understand the difference between KSUB and KSU5, in the defined scenario, we have both. planned values, become actual with the MEC activities. business definition.
regarding the cycle, I have setup assessment cost element so we can get all planned lines posted as 1.
On sender tab I have only the cost center. no cost element defined.
receiver its cost center.
furthermore, i've not setup allocation structure, so all cost elements should be allow, there is no restriction on this.
the only difference is: planned costs which their origin is already an assessment are not being assessed again.
I can show you the print screens with cycles setup if it helps
best regards
MF

WSDL consumption error

Hi All,
There is an existing scenario where in a query from the Portal passes to the SAP and SAP sends the response data to the Portal.
For this a Sender SOAP and RFC Receiver is used. A WSDL is given to the Portal team.
The Portal team is of JAVA background.
Now a similar scenario needs to be developed and the new Portal wants to use the same WSDL. The new Portal team is of Dot net background. They say that the WSDL when consumed is showing some error. The methods are missing. Does this have something to do with the WSDL or is it because of the background change? The new Portal team got the WSDL from the old Portal team.
please give your inputs...

>Now a similar scenario needs to be developed and the new Portal wants to use the same WSDL. The new Portal team is of Dot net background. They say that the WSDL when consumed is showing some error. The methods are missing. Does this have something to do with the WSDL or is it because of the background change? The new Portal team got the WSDL from the old Portal team
You are basically using soap sender (hosting webservice) and let the portal team(both java and .net) to consume your webservice and backend SAP is handled via RFC adapter. If you dont have any change in the PI side and use the same interface for both portal team then the same WSDL should work for both the java and .net portal team. Problem is not in your side.
Use XMLSPY or SOAPUI and test your WSDL and see how that behaves. If everything works well then pass those test details to portal team. Also ask portal team (.net) about their errors?
Why dont you provide the WSDL to the new portal team and see the behaviour.

Urgent : Runtime error

hi All Gurus,
i am getting Runetime error while going to convert planned order to process order by using T.Code: MD04.
Error :
"Runtime Error          SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC
Except.                CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB"
"|ShrtText                                                                                |
|    The ABAP/4 Open SQL array insert results in duplicate database records.                      -
|What happened?
Error in ABAP application program.
The current ABAP program "SAPLM61U" had to be terminated because one of the
statements could not be executed.
|    This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program.    "
it comes while Saving the order. Sometimes it saves order and sometime it gives error.
Another problem is that sometimes it is picking wrong production version.
plz help ASAP.
thnaks

Hi
This is ABNAP issue.
you better coordinate with your technical team memebr who can analise & solve.
Regartds
YMREDDY

Back Flush Compared to Manual GI

Hello,
I am comparing the pros & cons of Backflush with Manual GI to suggest the suitable solution .. the points that I could think at top of my head are as follows ..
Back Flush
Pros
Minimal human intervention
User's with limited understanding can function
Faster goods issue process
Cons
Large cumulative variance in system & actual stock figures over time in most cases
Not Recommended for high value material
Salient Feature: Suggested for low cost & less critical BOM components where there is not much financial/ logistic impact with variance within tolerances.
Manual GI
Pros
Accurate consumption can be captured
Better actual & system inventory figure sync
Accurate inventory figures enables better requirement planning
Cons
Recommended for matured users
Labour intensive (Manual activity)
Demand discipline in terms of reporting the consumption error posting due to stock deficit etc
Salient Feature: Recommended for high price & critical BOM components where consumption needs to be captured more accurately.
Please suggest your views on expriences across differrent clients ...

Dear,
Apart from Bcakflush and manulgood issue please check this also, Good issue can be done through MB1A, COO1N, CO15. CO27.
Transactions CO27/COIK are lists, based on the order information system, whereas Transaction MB26 is reservation-based. However, it is also possible to make an order-based selection in Transaction MB26 using the 'Production order' selection window. In this case, both lists should also issue the same components for identical orders.
In the event of incorrect goods movements in Transaction COGI, picking using Transaction MB26 generates postprocessing records, whereas Transactions CO27 and COIK send an error handling. If the goods movements cannot be corrected, the records are returned unchanged.
Picking using Transaction MB26 can be scheduled as a background job.
This is not possible with Transaction CO27/COIK.
In Transactions COIK/COHV, you can use mass processing to store goods movements of the picking as future change records and you can then update them later using a report (for example CORUPROC). There is no function of this type in Transaction MB26.
Coming to your pron and cos,
In backflush you need to use the program CORUPROC to update COGI or terminted inccoreted good movement through OPK4.
Else it is very eassy process but 311 you need to use for transfer from the Ware House to Production stroage loaction.
Unplanned good issue you need to define in confirmtaion screen but there are chances of miss mach of quantity due to manual entry. So here you need screen control.
In correct good issue you need to cancle the confirmation but in Manual good issue you can do it seperatly.
But in manual good issue it is possible to confirm the order without good issue.
Hope it will help you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Mrp parameter not maintaied

Hi,
in MD04 getting error message MRP PAAMETER FOR PLANT NOT MAINTAINED
PL suggest

Dear,
Plant Parameter settings are necessary to run the MRP for Plant. OPPQ
Some important settings are Bom/routing selection, BOM mexplosion , planning Horz, MRP contoll , planned order .
Please check with OPPQ & get the details with F1 help.
All the settings should be "maintained" before the MRP.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Error in report MD04

Dear Gurus,
have you ever seen the following error message?
"Order 000001008418 possibly contains recursive BOM components
Message no. MF331
Diagnosis
The order contains component reservations that could have a higher low-level code than that of the order material.
To avoid an endless loop the requirement for this component is not included."
On the report MD04, I try to explode the "order report for element", where you can find the tree of the bom with the mrp results to cover the materials needs, but this error occurs..
How can I solve? which is the problem that origins the error, if the association of mp level to material code (in MARA) is automatic with mainteinance of the BOM?
Thank,
Valentina

Hi Raut and Guha,
tks for your replaies!
My situation is that one descripted in Snote: 10000698, as Guha suggested but no updates are run When I install the note. The systeme tell me that there are no valid input to manage.
The error related is the follow:
SAP Note does not contain valid correction instructions
Message no. SCWN002
Diagnosis
You tried to implement corrections that are contained in an SAP Note.
The corrections in this SAP Note are, however, not valid for the release and Support Package level of your system. This means that the error that is described in the SAP Note either did not occur in your system, or it has already been corrected by a Support Package.
In certain cases the error cannot be corrected by an SAP Note correction.
System Response
The system cannot implement the SAP Note.
Procedure
Follow the recommendations in the SAP Note text.
What can I do?I can find No significative instruction on the note!!
Thanks again,
Valentina

In 3rd party sales error -consumption a/c not assigned to PO auto a/c assig

Dear Friends,
while creating va01 for 3rd party sales , error -consumption a/c not assigned to purchase order automatic account assignment.
i need to do obyc setting for gbb in need to select a/c modifier -what is that ?
SO is a cost object.
Reg
nagesh

Hi,
Please review the following notes for more information:
550388 FAQ: Customizing of third-party and individual Pos
210997 Accnt assignmt categoriesin third-party and indiv.P
On creating Purchase order for requirement created for a customer sales order stock, if the customer sales order stock is not valuated, this means a Consumption ( GBB ) account is involved here. If the posting is a consumption account, SAP allows the user to decide whether it should be autotmatically or manually entered. Because of this option, system need this account to be set with Field 'Automatic posting only' to ' '.
With this field 'Automatic posting only' setting to ' ', whether the account can be automatically or manually entered is then controlled by the field status in the PO creation. If you do not want the user to enter the account manually, then this account should be set to display mode in PO.
If the customer sales order stock is valuated, then in General business process, this would involve a BSX ( material account )
postings. Normally this is automatically derived during PO creations. No manual enterring is allowed. Thus if it is correct to set this account with field Automatic posting only' setting to 'X' in FI settings.
Please read the note 37563.
Please check if note 842977 is present in your system.
regards
Waman

Error in Sales order - Consumption account not found

Hi Gurus,
I am facing an error in Sales order - 'Consumption account not found'. The scenario is third party. In sales order, it says 'Consumption account not found'. the item category is TAS and scedule line category has general modification key 'VKA'. And as it is third party, thr is no movement type for the schedule line category. The valuation class of the material is 3334 (software services). I was thinking In OBYC, under GBB key, this combination of my val. grping code+ 3334 + VKA and relevant GLs shud exist.
But in my development client, i dont get any error for the same material. And in thr also, thr is no mention of entry like above combination in OBYC. So its making me think that its not config error. But its an issue of master data or GL data.
Please help me . This is critical.
-Prashant

Hi,
Your observation is perfectly write, the possible errors are
1. Check the combination of Account modifier of Purchase order account assignmnet or PR. Based on the modifier and check the relevent combination in OBYC
Valuation ClassAccount ModifierIf Groups is there + Transaction Event Key + Gl Accounts
2. If GL Account is available then check the GL Master through FS00 for validation of mandatory consumption is required and i feel there is no issue with material master.
Rewards if it helps
Regards
Goutham

Error in the explosion of "order report for element" in MD04

Hi gurus,
On the report MD04, I try to explode the "order report for element", where you can find the tree of the bom with the mrp results to cover the materials needs, but the following error occurs:
"Order 000001008418 possibly contains recursive BOM components
Message no. MF331
Diagnosis
The order contains component reservations that could have a higher low-level code than that of the order material.
To avoid an endless loop the requirement for this component is not included."
As one of you suggested, I tryed to install the Snote: 10000698, but the systeme tell me that there are no valid input to manage.
The error related is the follow:
"SAP Note does not contain valid correction instructions
Message no. SCWN002
Diagnosis
You tried to implement corrections that are contained in an SAP Note.
The corrections in this SAP Note are, however, not valid for the release and Support Package level of your system. This means that the error that is described in the SAP Note either did not occur in your system, or it has already been corrected by a Support Package.
In certain cases the error cannot be corrected by an SAP Note correction.
System Response
The system cannot implement the SAP Note.
Procedure
Follow the recommendations in the SAP Note text."
..now, what can I do?I can find No significative instruction on the note!!
Please help me: our client is very annoyed by this problem!
Thanks,
Valentina

Dear,
Error message MF331 'Order & possibly contains recursive BOM components' is generated in the order report.
If the header BOM material same you are using as a component then BOM become Recursive.
If you create a recursive BOM, you must decide whether you want to allow recursiveness or delete the component that caused the recursiveness,
Go to CS02 BOM of that material and check the sets recursive indicator.
Also refer the OSS Note 839879. 161742 - Consulting note:
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

MD04 consumption error.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for