Memory Leak while using -Xrunhprof option in Linux OS

While using the follwing option in my application there is memory leak in JVM in Linux OS.
-Xrunhprof:heap=all,cpu=times,monitor=y,file=/home/gemini/dilip/www2.log,thread=yIs this a bug ??

Little lost here. Looks like you are facing memory leaks in Tuxedo 7.1 WS
client code when it talks with Tuxedo 6.x? Is this correct?
If so, try installing latest rolling patch for Tuxedo 7.1.
We recently fixed couple of memory leaks in interop area. One was related to
compression.
_shailesh
Scott Orshan <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
If you are running with the latest patch, then report these problems to
Support, giving them sample code so that they can reproduce the problem.
Scott
Thomas Winter wrote:
Hi Scott,
as an additional information:
The guys at the server side changed something (their
formaly useing the old 6.3 libraries at server side)
and surprise... the client has no memory leak anymore.
But, if more than one thread at the same time use the atmi calls
there is still some memory consumption.
The workaround is to use a mutex object to make sure, that
only one thread use the atmi calls.
AFAIS Tuxedo has an Problem with Multithreading.
Thx
Thomas

Similar Messages

Error while using selection option variable in the selection screen

Hi All,
I am facing an issue while using selection option variable in the selection screen for one of my reports.
Scenario: For the field "Region From" we need to have wild card logic () in tes selection screen, for example if we put "BE" in the selection screen for the field Region From then the query should be executed only for those "Region From" values which begin from "BE".
Approach: For the above requirement I have made a selection option variable for "Region From". This allows use wild card
But when the report is executed we get the following error:
"System error in program CL_RSR_REQUEST. Invalid filter on ETVRGNFR".
(ETVRGNFR is technical name of the info object Region From)
Though the report is executed it displays all the values for the field "Region From" irrespective of the selection given in the selection screen.
Please give suggestions / alternate solutions to crack this issue.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Priyanka.

Hi,
Try to use a variable of type Customer Exit and do the validation inside the exit to display according to your request.
This is just my view, i am not sure if u are already using this or Char. Variable.
Cheers.
Ranga.

Problem in reports 6i while using delimiter option.

Hi,
I am facing problem in report writer while using delimiter option.
Report summary
==============
In my report I am having two queries in data model and two different repeating frame for each in layout.
These quires are called based on the user parameter. That means if user parameter is 1 then query 1 is called and the report is kick off and same for query 2 when user parameter is 2).
Problem Encountered
=================
Both these reports are running fine while using pdf option to generate report .
While using delimiter option only one of the query is able to generate report (based on which ever is created first and rest will give 0 byte file).
I have also trapped it while using messages and it is logically flowing fine.
I think report writer does not support such scenario.
please expedite on this.
thankx
peyush

Hi,
There are no such limitations with Reports. If I understand properly, you run the Report twice, in each run, you are trying to execute different query, and you generate two dilimited Reports output files? This should work fine. Try out the latest Reports 6i patch-10 for this. You can even approach Oracle Support with your testcase. FYI, with Reports 6i patch-11, a new feature "dlimited data" is introduced which will give delimited output with a data dump i.e it would not be dependent upon the Reports layout. You can probably try out this new feature also.
Thanks,
Rohit Hi Rohit,
Thanks for the information.
well I am generating single output file on each run .
the problem is somewhat funny.
I have build query2 in data model after query1.
query 1 is giving me correct output both in .PDF and delimiter version.
But query2 is giving me 0 byte file for delimiter version although in .PDF it is running fine.
When I took out query2 to another module it is running fine for both.
I hope this make sense.
Moreover if u still not clear about the problem and thinks that u can help me out please send me ur mail id so that I can send you the RDF copy.
Thanks
Mohit...

Memory leak when "Use JSSE SSL" is enabled

I'm investigating a memory leak that occurs in WebLogic 11g (10.3.3 and 10.3.5) when "Use JSSE SSL" is checked using the Sun/Oracle JVM and JCE/JSSE providers. The leak is reproducible just by hitting the WebLogic Admin Console login page repeatedly using SSL. Running the app server under JProfiler shows byte arrays (among other objects) leaking from the socket handling code. I thought it might be a general problem with the default JSSE provider, but Tomcat does not exhibit the problem.
Anyone else seeing this?

Yes, we are seeing it as well on Oracle 11g while running a GWT 2.1.1 application using GWT RPC. Our current fix is to remove the JSSE SSL configuration check, however this might not be an option if you really need it for your application. Have you found anything else about it?

Memory leak when using DB_DBT_MALLOC in CDB.

Hello!
Recently when I'm using Berkeley DB CDB and set the value Dbt DB_DBT_MALLOC, I noticed that the app's memory keeps growing during the db.get while;
I found that many codes on the internet use the syntax free(value.get_data()), but when I tried to free the value.get_data(), I always got an interruption error.
It's OK when I'm using the DB_DBT_USERMEM flag. So I just get very confused about the DB_DBT_MALLOC and DB_DBT_REALLOC.
And also, I wonder why there's no memory leak problem when we use the single thread BDB. I think BDB cannot free the value.data pointer too in single thread before the app finish using it, then why our apps don't need to free the data afterwards?
Thanks a lot in advance!

You should use free() to free the DBT memory allocated via DB_DBT_MALLOC. You should do that after each Db::get() operation (and of course after finishing processing/using the data), otherwise you will loose the pointer to the memory previously allocated if you happen to reuse the DBT with DB_DBT_MALLOC (the data field will point to a new memory address).
Alternatively you could use DB_DBT_REALLOC or DB_DBT_USERMEM.
Note that there are small structures that BDB creates in the environment regions that only get freed/cleaned when the environment is closed.
If you suspect that there is a memory leak inside the BDB code, make sure you rebuild Berkeley DB using the following configuration options (along with the others you use) when building: enable-debug, enable-umrw. Than, run the program under a memory leak detection utility, like Valgrind (allow the application to open and close the BDB environment) and see if there are any leaks reported.
If memory leaks are reported, then put together a small stand-alone test case program that demonstrates the leaks, and post it here.
Regards,
Andrei

Client-side Memory leak while executing PL/SQL and reading from a view

Iam noticing memory leaks in OCCI while performing the following:
Sample function()
1. Obtain a connection
2. Create a statement to execute a PL/SQL procedure
3 Execute the statement created in step #2
4. Terminate the statement created in step #2
5. Create a statement to read from a view which was populated
by executing stored procedure in step #3
6. Execute the statement created in step #5
7. Terminate the statement created in step #5
8. Release the connection
The PL/SQL populates a view with fixed 65,000 records for every execution. PL/SQL opens a cursor, loads 65000 records and populates the target view and closes the cursor at the end. If i invoke the above function it results in memory leak of 4M for every call. I tried several variants such as:
1. Disabling statement caching
2. Using setSQL instead of newly creating second SQL statement
3. Obtaining two separate connections for these two activities (PL/SQL exec and View read)
4. Breaking the sample function into two, one for each of these activities (PL/SQL exec and View read).
All the combinations results in the same behaviour of 4M memory leak.
Iam using Oracle 10g Client/Server 10.2.0.1.0.
Is there any known limitations in this area?

Yes. Iam closing the result set and terminating the statement.
My program contains layers of inhouse wrapper classes, which will take some time for
me to present it in pure OCCI calls, to be posted here for your understanding.
After some more debugging, i found that if the connection level statement caching is set to
0, the memory leak is much lower than before.
Thanks.
Message was edited by:
user498920

Detect memory leak in JNI so files for linux and Solaris

I have to find the memory leaks in the JNI for solaris and linux but the issue is
i need to find the leaks in the so files.I have solved the issues of leaks using Purify
on windows but not getting appropriate support for linux. Any pointers to tools will help.I tried Valgrind on linux but it is not giving me the exact location of leak as in purify and also the support for purify is for 32 bit only.Valgrind is not showing any functions in .so files.JNI is not supported in Purify for Solaris? Please Help.

amol28 wrote:
I have to find the memory leaks in the JNI for solaris and linux but the issue is
i need to find the leaks in the so files.I have solved the issues of leaks using Purify
on windows but not getting appropriate support for linux. Any pointers to tools will help.I tried Valgrind on linux but it is not giving me the exact location of leak as in purify and also the support for purify is for 32 bit only.Valgrind is not showing any functions in .so files.JNI is not supported in Purify for Solaris? Please Help.If you have written the JNI, the JNI itself (java calls, methods, etc) to be OS agnostic then it shouldn't matter. In that case you check the windows code (not jni), the linux code (not jni) and the jni code itself independent of each other.
If you haven't made the JNI OS agnostic the question would be why not?

Memory leak when using Threads?

I did an experiment and noticed a memory leak when I was using threads.. Here's what I did.
======================================
while( true )
     Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
     String answer;
     System.out.print("Press Enter to continue...");
     answer = sc.next();
     new TestThread();
========================================
And TestThead is the following
========================================
import java.io.*;
import java.net.*;
public class TestThread extends Thread
public TestThread() { start(); }
public void run() { }
=====================================
When I open windows Task Manager, every time a new thread starts and stops, the java.exe increases the Mem Usage.. Its a memory leak!? What is going on in this situation.. If I start a thread and the it stops, and then I start a new thread, why does it use more memory?
-Brian

MoveScanner sc = new
Scanner(System.in);out of the
loop.Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
while (true) {
That won't matter in any meaningful way.
Every loop iteration creates a new Scanner, but it also makes a Scanner eligible for GC, so the net memory requirement of the program is constant.
Now, of course, it's possible that the VM won't bother GCing until 64 MB worth of Scanners have been created, but we don't care about that. If we're allowing the GC 64 MB, then we don't care how it uses it or when it cleans it up.

Memory leak when using database connectivity toolset and ODBC driver for MySQL

The "DB Tools Close Connection VI" does not free all the memory used when "DB Tools Open Connection VI" connects to "MySQL ODBC Driver 3.51".
I have made a small program that only opens and close the connection that I run continously and it's slowly eating all my memory. No error is given from any of the VI's. (I'm using the "Simple Error Handler VI" to check for errors.)
I've also tried different options in the DSN configuration without any results.
Attachments:
TestProgram.vi ‏16 KB
DSNconfig1.jpg ‏36 KB
DSNconfig2.jpg ‏49 KB

Also,
I've duplicated the OPs example: a simple VI that opens and closes a connection. I can say this definately causes a memory leak.
Watching the memory:
10:17AM - 19308K
10:19AM - 19432K
10:22AM - 19764K
10:58AM - 22124K
Regards,
Ken
Attachments:
OpenCloseConnection.vi ‏13 KB

Makequeues memory leak when using Lexmark Z53

Behavior with printer switched off while connected to built-in USB port:
Problem 1: makequeues has a memory leak, starting up with between 3 and 5 MB of RAM. This is done by connecting the printer when logged in and watching via Activity Monitor.
Initially makequeues has sent 255 Mach messages. Every ~10.5 seconds, makequeues sends 59 more messages and gets 53 in reply. With each send/receive cycle, its RAM usage grows by 8 KB, a rate of 780 kiB/min.
Problem 2: The process is started each time the same printer is reconnected.
Symptoms: Disconnecting the printer doesn't let the process exit (any instance). If left alone, the memory usage cycle continues.
The memory leak caught my attention after taking up over a half-gigabyte of RAM when I left the Mac running over night.
Resolution:
(1) Disconnect USB cable
(2) Kill each instance of the process
Results:
(1) The process launches after reconnection of the printer with 996 KB of RAM, immediately having sent 60 Mach messages and received 56.
(2) During this run time, the process may use less and less RAM, down to a minimum of 912.
(3) After sending 64 more messages without replies, one every 4 seconds, the process exits after having sent a total of 120 messages.
(4) This behavior (1 through 3) is the same for each process launched as a result of printer reconnection.
This behavior isn't shown during Safe Mode boot - makequeues never starts up as a result of printer connection.
PowerMac G4 QuickSilver 2001 733Mhz

If this is meant to be a bug report, please file a bug report in the proper place. This is a user to user discussion forum.
As to the source of running 'makequeues' (/System/Library/SystemConfiguration/PrinterNotifications.bundle/Contents/MacOS /makequeues), I would look at the Lexmark software. I currently have two Epson printers connected via USB with CUPS running. I see no process 'makequeues' appearing.
Matt

HUGE memory leak when using MP3

I downloaded a new FME 2.0 and noticed they added an option
to stream in MP3 format. DO NOT USE that mode (!). If you start
streaming in MP3 format you will get a huge memory leak on the
client side. Your browser starts eating memory like crazy and it
will bury your machine withing an hour or two by taking all the
memory available. I have proved it on several machines, notifed
Adobe. They confirmed it as a bug and promised to fix in the future
releases. Nice, huh? and what people are supposed to do with the
current build?

A new build 2.0.1.1114 has been posted . Please try and let
us know if you face this issue with this build.

Mountain Lion memory leak while asleep?

My early 2011 MBP started to randomly crash after installing ML and Safari would take an age to load, endless spinning wheels, apps not opening etc etc. So did a Boot sector permissions verify and repair (2 very minor mismatched files) then a reset of PRAM and SMC which has cured the crashes and improved things from startup and removed old Sophos and installed new ML version.
But the biggest problem is when waking from sleep. I have a memory tool in my status bar which usually shows anything between 3.5 - 5gb free RAM under normal conditions (I have 8gb installed) and that is what will be showing when I put it to sleep. When waking I get constant spinning wheels, the clock is frozen (spinning wheel will start from Time Capsule icon all the way to Spotlight) and the RAM tool is displaying 45mb or less of free RAM. It takes at least 5 minutes for RAM to creep back up to 150mb or so when things will then start to become usable. But at this point I won't even get an internet connection until I use the memory tool to fee up more RAM. I've read of other problems regarding wireless connectivity when waking up but I'm using an ethernet connection. Once everything has calmed down and memory settled down MBP works flawlessly with no crashing and all apps working fine and there is a speed improvement but I shouldn't have to wait up to 10 minutes for my MBP to be usable. I did notice that when launching Sys Prefs the Time Machine tab caused it to freeze so could this have something to do with that?
But what could be bleeding off the RAM while it's asleep?
I'm so ****** off at this, never a problem with SL and definitely wishing I'd waited before doing this upgrade, it reminds me of my Windows Vista days!!!

Hello.
In my Macbook Pro 4GB RAM recently note memory leak when I opened Safari even with 1 or two windows open without refresh the web content.
In Activity monitor could see consume Web Content the Safari Spend more the 2 GB RAM (Memory Real become Memory Inactive)
Solution: Disable All Extensions and probe one to one. Finding that Fastesttube Extension was responsible.
Check this Info
http://atylmo.wordpress.com/2011/06/...d-fastesttube/
Best Regards

Memory Leak when using Active X and/or Modbus commands

I am using a piece of hardware connected by ethernet to my PC with its own IP address. The unit sends me data from my test rig (16 differential channels) such as voltage, current, temp, pressure etc.
I am able to use ActiveX commands to get the data sent back. I am sampling data at about 1 second intervals and graphing it within Labview. The problem is that Labview consumes memory at about 4K every minute. I open a connection to the IP address send the ActiveX command receive the string of characters back and then close the connection (this procedure is repeated every second). The advice given by NI engineers was that it was the limitation of ActiveX communication layers, so I set about using Modbus TCP/IP instead.
I searched the knowledge base and found an example of using Modbus to communicate to a Festo controller written by an NI engineer. I adapted this to suit reading back one input register starting at address 1 and found it obtained the data from my own piece of hardware. Again, running this in a 1 second interval a memory leak of about 4K/minute occurs.
Neither approach is satisfactory as tests must run for months at a time without interruption.
Is the problem therefore not to do with Labview and not the communication layer protocols?
A solution would be greatly appreciated!!

I've attached both the ActiveX vi and the Modbus vi code
Attachments:
ActiveX.vi ‏58 KB
Modbus.zip ‏658 KB

Huge memory leaks in using PL/SQL tables and collections

I have faced a very interesting problem recently.
I use PL/SQL tables ( Type TTab is table of ... index by binary_integer; ) and collections ( Type TTab is table of ...; ) in my packages very widely. And have noticed avery strange thing Oracle does. It seems to me that there are memory leaks in PGA when I use PL/SQL tables or collections. Let me a little example.
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE rds_mdt_test IS
TYPE TNumberList IS TABLE OF NUMBER INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
PROCEDURE test_plsql_table(cnt INTEGER);
END rds_mdt_test;
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY rds_mdt_test IS
PROCEDURE test_plsql_table(cnt INTEGER) IS
x TNumberList;
BEGIN
FOR indx IN 1 .. cnt LOOP
x(indx) := indx;
END LOOP;
END;
END rds_mdt_test;
I run the following test code:
BEGIN
rds_mdt_test.test_plsql_table (1000000);
END;
and see that my session uses about 40M in PGA.
If I repeat this example in the same session creating the PL/SQL table of smaller size, for instance:
BEGIN
rds_mdt_test.test_plsql_table (1);
END;
I see again that the size of used memory in PGA by my session was not decreased and still be the same.
The same result I get if I use not PL/SQL tables, but collections or varrays.
I have tried some techniques to make Oracle to free the memory, for instance to rewrite my procedure in the following ways:
PROCEDURE test_plsql_table(cnt INTEGER) IS
x TNumberList;
BEGIN
FOR indx IN 1 .. cnt LOOP
x(indx) := indx;
END LOOP;
x.DELETE;
END;
or
PROCEDURE test_plsql_table(cnt INTEGER) IS
x TNumberList;
BEGIN
FOR indx IN 1 .. cnt LOOP
x(indx) := indx;
END LOOP;
FOR indx in 1 .. cnt LOOP
x.DELETE(indx);
END LOOP;
END;
or
PROCEDURE test_plsql_table(cnt INTEGER) IS
x TNumberList;
empty TNumberList;
BEGIN
FOR indx IN 1 .. cnt LOOP
x(indx) := indx;
END LOOP;
x := empty;
END;
and so on, but result was the same.
This is a huge problem for me as I have to manipulate collections and PL/SQL tables of very big size (from dozens of thousand of rows to millions or rows) and just a few sessions running my procedure may cause server's fall due to memory lack.
I can not understand what Oracle reseveres such much memory for (I use local variables) -- is it a bug or a feature?
I will be appreciated for any help.
I use Oracle9.2.0.1.0 server under Windows2000.
Thank you in advance.
Dmitriy.

Thank you, William!
Your advice about using DBMS_SESSION.FREE_UNUSED_USER_MEMORY was very useful. Indeed it is the tool I was looking for.
Now I write my code like this
declare
type TTab is table of ... index binary_integer;
res TTab;
empty_tab TTab;
begin
res(1) := ...;
res := empty_tab;
DBMS_SESSION.FREE_UNUSED_USER_MEMORY;
end;
I use construction "res := empty_tab;" to mark all memory allocated to PL/SQL table as unused according to Tom Kyte's advices. And I could live a hapy life if everything were so easy. Unfortunately, some tests I have done showed that there are some troubles in cleaning complex nested PL/SQL tables indexed by VARCHAR2 which I use in my current project.
Let me another example.
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE rds_mdt_test IS
TYPE TTab0 IS TABLE OF NUMBER INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
TYPE TRec1 IS RECORD(
NAME VARCHAR2(4000),
rows TTab0);
TYPE TTab1 IS TABLE OF TRec1 INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
TYPE TRec2 IS RECORD(
NAME VARCHAR2(4000),
rows TTab1);
TYPE TTab2 IS TABLE OF TRec2 INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
TYPE TStrTab IS TABLE OF NUMBER INDEX BY VARCHAR2(256);
PROCEDURE test_plsql_table(cnt INTEGER);
PROCEDURE test_str_tab(cnt INTEGER);
x TTab2;
empty_tab2 TTab2;
empty_tab1 TTab1;
empty_tab0 TTab0;
str_tab TStrTab;
empty_str_tab TStrTab;
END rds_mdt_test;
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY rds_mdt_test IS
PROCEDURE test_plsql_table(cnt INTEGER) IS
BEGIN
FOR indx1 IN 1 .. cnt LOOP
FOR indx2 IN 1 .. cnt LOOP
FOR indx3 IN 1 .. cnt LOOP
x(indx1) .rows(indx2) .rows(indx3) := indx1;
END LOOP;
END LOOP;
END LOOP;
x := empty_tab2;
dbms_session.free_unused_user_memory;
END;
PROCEDURE test_str_tab(cnt INTEGER) IS
BEGIN
FOR indx IN 1 .. cnt LOOP
str_tab(indx) := indx;
END LOOP;
str_tab := empty_str_tab;
dbms_session.free_unused_user_memory;
END;
END rds_mdt_test;
1. Running the script
BEGIN
rds_mdt_test.test_plsql_table ( 100 );
END;
I see that usage of PGA memory in my session is close to zero. So, I can judge that nested PL/SQL table indexed by BINARY_INTEGER and the memory allocated to it were cleaned successfully.
2. Running the script
BEGIN
rds_mdt_test.test_str_tab ( 1000000 );
END;
I can see that plain PL/SQL table indexed by VARCHAR2 and memory allocated to it were cleaned also.
3. Changing the package's type
TYPE TTab2 IS TABLE OF TRec2 INDEX BY VARCHAR2(256);
and running the script
BEGIN
rds_mdt_test.test_plsql_table ( 100 );
END;
I see that my session uses about 62M in PGA. If I run this script twice, the memory usage is doubled and so on.
The same result I get if I rewrite not highest, but middle PL/SQL type:
TYPE TTab1 IS TABLE OF TRec1 INDEX BY VARCHAR2(256);
And only if I change the third, most nested type:
TYPE TTab0 IS TABLE OF NUMBER INDEX BY VARCHAR2(256);
I get the desired result -- all memory was returned to OS.
So, as far as I can judge, in some cases Oracle does not clean complex PL/SQL tables indexed by VARCHAR2.
Is it true or not? Perhaps there are some features in using such way indexed tables?

Memory leak when using JMS Cache Coordination

We have two Weblogic Server 8.1 processes running Java 1.4.2 on Solaris using TOPLink 10.1.3 with JMS Cache Coordination. We observe that heap is filled with uncollectable instances of TOPLink-mapped classes. In our production system, under full load, this completely fills a 3.6 GB heap in 30 minutes, requiring a process restart. The problem goes away if we turn off cache coordination.
It appears that these instances are UnitOfWork or some other kind of toplink-created clone. We have not yet been able to successfully analyse this problem with a heap profiler.
Has anyone else experienced this this problem? Any suggestions for debugging?
Thanks in advance.

We do set the command manager to asychronous mode. (Our debug tracing confirms that the CommandPropagator method asynchronousPropagateCommand() is invoked, not synchronousPropagateCommand().) We started with asynchronous messaging and actually have never tried running in a synchronous mode.
The Java bug I referenced in my last post (which I have confirmed with a stand-alone test case) indicates that, for Java 1.4.2 and earlier, is is never ok to not start() a Thread -- it will always produce a memory leak. So I am quite surprised than anyone on a pre-1.5 Java had ever had success with synchronous cache coordination messaging. Do you think it is possible all of the pre-release tests and existing customers installations of 10.1.3 cache coordination are using Java 1.5 ?!
Our heap profiling indicates that the instances of CommandPropagator which are pinned (i.e., those not started) are allocated in the run() method of CommandPropagator itself. So it seems that the instance of CommandPropagator, after it is started, allocates another one in its run method. Looking at the bytecodes for the run() method (using javap -c) shows that in one branch of the code a second CommandPropagator is indeed allocated and then handed off to the launchContainerRunnable method of a ServerPlatform.
Since these secondary CommandPropagators are the ones which are not started, we have looked into the WebLogic_8_1_Platform class and found that its implementation launchContainerRunnable (inherited from ServerPlatformBase) does a
new Thread(runnable).start()where the argument runnable is the CommandPropagator.
So the CommandPropagator itself is not started(), but is instead run an another Thread.
We are experimenting with a custom ServerPlatform which overrides launchContainerRunnable:
    server.setServerPlatform(
        new WebLogic_8_1_Platform(server)
            public void launchContainerRunnable(Runnable runnable)
               if (runnable instanceof Thread) ((Thread)runnable).start();
               else super.launchContainerRunnable(runnable);
    ); This starts the argument Runnable directly if it is actually a Thread. Our early, small-scale tests indicate that this change eliminates the memory leak. We are testing now in a production-replicate environment under full load.
But this feels like a hack. I have no idea what TOPLink behavior other than cache coordination flows through this method. Does anyone know what else this ServerPlatform method is used for? Is there a better way to do this? Are there any adverse conquences to our hack? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

Memory Leak while using -Xrunhprof option in Linux OS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for