Merge Statement in 10g

Hi all,
The following article shows how one can use Merge for Insert alone:
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/10g/MergeEnhancements10g.php
in particular:
-- No matched clause, insert only.
MERGE INTO test1 a
USING all_objects b
ON (a.object_id = b.object_id)
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT (object_id, status)
VALUES (b.object_id, b.status)
WHERE b.status != 'VALID';
when I used the same ... in my program ... I am getting the following error:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
can some one give me an idea ... what I am doing wrong?
I am using release 10.2.0.3.0
Thanks

Works fine on 10.2.0.1.0:
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE    10.2.0.1.0      Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
SQL> create table test1 as select object_id, status from all_objects where 1 = 2;
Table created.
SQL> MERGE INTO test1 a
  2  USING all_objects b
  3  ON (a.object_id = b.object_id)
  4  WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
  5  INSERT (object_id, status)
  6  VALUES (b.object_id, b.status)
  7  WHERE b.status != 'VALID';
50 rows merged.SY.

Similar Messages

  • Can sql merge statement be used in a batch (oracle 10g)?

    Hello,
    I am trying to insert into an oracle table multiple rows of values selected from a web page. Can I use a merge statement as a preparedStatement to avoid inserting duplicate records?
    Does anybody have any examples they would like to share?
    Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
    Thank you,
    Logan

    I've implemented this by batch inserting into a temp table then running a merge then dropping the temp table.
    public void mergeMethod() {
            final String createsql = "CREATE TABLE temp (a INTEGER, b INTEGER, c INTEGER)";
            final String insertsql = "INSERT INTO temp (a, b, c) VALUES (?,?,?)";
            final String mergesql = "MERGE INTO my_table A " +
               "USING temp B ON (A.a = B.a AND A.b = B.b) " +
               "WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET A.c = B.c " +
               "WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT (A.id, A.a, A.b, A.c) " +
               "VALUES (my_seq.Nextval,B.a,B.b,B.c)";
            final String dropsql = "DROP TABLE temp";
         Connection conn = null;
         Statement cs = null;
         Statement ms = null;
         Statement ds = null;
         PreparedStatement ps = null;
         boolean retValue = false;
         try {
              conn = getConnection();
              conn.setAutoCommit(false);
              cs = conn.createStatement();
              ms = conn.createStatement();
              ds = conn.createStatement();
              ps = conn.prepareStatement(insertsql);
              for (int i=0; i< 10; i++){
                   ps.setInt(1, i);
                   ps.setInt(2, i+1);
                   ps.setInt(3, i+2);
                   ps.addBatch();
              // create temp table
              cs.execute(createsql);
              // execute in batch
              final int updateCount[] = ps.executeBatch();
              // merge the two tables
              ms.execute(mergesql);
              // drop the temp table
              ds.execute(dropsql);
              conn.commit();
              System.out.println("Rows is updated: " + updateCount.length);
         } catch (final SQLException e) {
              if (conn != null) {
                  conn.rollback();
              throw e;
         } finally {
              if (ps != null) {
                  ps.close();
              if (cs != null) {
                  cs.close();
              if (ms != null) {
                  ms.close();
              if (ds != null) {
                  ds.close();
              if (conn != null) {
                  conn.close();
    }

  • Problem in Merge statement

    Hi All,
    I am using merge statement to update 30000 records from the tables having 55 lacs records.
    But it is taking much time as i have to kill the session after 12 hours,as it was still going on.
    If,Same update i m doing using cursors,it will finish in less than 3 hours.
    Merge i was using is :-
    MERGE INTO Table1 a
    USING (SELECT MAX (TO_DATE ( TO_CHAR (contact_date, 'dd/mm/yyyy')
    || contact_time,
    'dd/mm/yyyy HH24:Mi:SS'
    ) m_condate,
    appl_id
    FROM Table2 b,
    (SELECT DISTINCT acc_no acc_no
    FROM Table3, Table1
    WHERE acc_no=appl_id AND delinquent_flag= 'Y'
    AND financier_id='NEWACLOS') d
    WHERE d.acc_no = b.appl_id
    AND ( contacted_by IS NOT NULL
    OR followup_branch_code IS NOT NULL
    GROUP BY appl_id) c
    ON (a.appl_id = c.appl_id AND a.delinquent_flag = 'Y')
    WHEN MATCHED THEN
    UPDATE
    SET last_contact_date = c.m_condate;
    In this query table 1 has 30000 records and table2 and table 3 have 3670955 and 555674 records respectively.
    Please suggest,what i am doing wrong in merge,because as per my understanding merge statement is much better than updates or updates using cursors.
    Required info is as follows:
    SQL> show parameter user_dump_dest
    NAME TYPE VALUE
    user_dump_dest string /opt/oracle/admin/FINCLUAT/udu
    mp
    SQL> show parameter optimizer
    NAME TYPE VALUE
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
    optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
    optimizer_index_caching integer 0
    optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
    optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
    optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
    SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
    NAME TYPE VALUE
    db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 16
    SQL> show parameter db_block_size
    NAME TYPE VALUE
    db_block_size integer 8192
    SQL> column sname format a20
    SQL> column pname format a20
    SQL> column pval2 format a20
    SQL> select
    2 sname     ,
    3 pname     ,
    4 pval1     ,
    5 pval2
    6 from
    7 sys.aux_stats$;
    sys.aux_stats$
    ERROR at line 7:
    ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.05
    SQL> explain plan for
    2 -- put your statement here
    3 MERGE INTO cs_case_info a
    4      USING (SELECT MAX (TO_DATE ( TO_CHAR (contact_date, 'dd/mm/yyyy')
    5                          || contact_time,
    6                          'dd/mm/yyyy HH24:Mi:SS'
    7                          )
    8                ) m_condate,
    9                appl_id
    10           FROM CS_CASE_DETAILS_ACLOS b,
    11                (SELECT DISTINCT acc_no acc_no
    12                FROM NEWACLOS_RESEARCH_HIST_AYLA, cs_case_info
    13                WHERE acc_no=appl_id AND delinquent_flag= 'Y'
    14                AND financier_id='NEWACLOS') d
    15           WHERE d.acc_no = b.appl_id
    16           AND ( contacted_by IS NOT NULL
    17                OR followup_branch_code IS NOT NULL
    18                )
    19           GROUP BY appl_id) c
    20      ON (a.appl_id = c.appl_id AND a.delinquent_flag = 'Y')
    21      WHEN MATCHED THEN
    22      UPDATE
    23           SET last_contact_date = c.m_condate
    24      ;
    Explained.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.08
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|
    | 0 | MERGE STATEMENT | | 47156 | 874K| | 128K (1)|
    | 1 | MERGE | CS_CASE_INFO | | | | |
    | 2 | VIEW | | | | | |
    | 3 | HASH JOIN | | 47156 | 36M| 5672K| 128K (1)|
    | 4 | VIEW | | 47156 | 5111K| | 82339 (1)|
    | 5 | SORT GROUP BY | | 47156 | 4236K| 298M| 82339 (1)|
    | 6 | HASH JOIN | | 2820K| 247M| 10M| 60621 (1)|
    | 7 | HASH JOIN | | 216K| 7830K| | 6985 (1)|
    | 8 | VIEW | index$_join$_012 | 11033 | 258K| | 1583 (1)|
    | 9 | HASH JOIN | | | | | |
    | 10 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CCI_DEL | 11033 | 258K| | 768 (1)|
    | 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | CS_CASE_INFO_UK | 11033 | 258K| | 821 (1)|
    | 12 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX_NACL_RSH_ACC_NO | 5539K| 68M| | 5382 (1)|
    | 13 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | CS_CASE_DETAILS_ACLOS | 3670K| 192M| | 41477 (1)|
    | 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | CS_CASE_INFO | 304K| 205M| | 35975 (1)|
    Note
    - 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
    24 rows selected.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.04
    SQL> rollback;
    Rollback complete.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
    SQL> set autotrace traceonly arraysize 100
    SQL> alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 8';
    ERROR:
    ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.04
    SQL>      disconnect
    Disconnected from Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
    SQL>      spool off
    Edited by: user4528984 on May 5, 2009 10:37 PM

    For one thing, alias your tables and use that in the column specifications (table1.column1 = table2.column3 for example)...
          SELECT
             DISTINCT
                acc_no acc_no
          FROM Table3, Table1
          WHERE acc_no            = appl_id
          AND   delinquent_flag   = 'Y'
          AND   financier_id      = 'NEWACLOS'We don't know what your tables look like, what columns come from where. Try and help us help you, assume we know NOTHING about YOUR system, because more likely than naught, that's going to be the case.
    In addition to that, please read through this which will give you a better-er idea of how to post a tuning related question, you've not provided near enough information for us to intelligently help you.
    HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting

  • FORALL MERGE statement works in local database but not over database link

    Given "list", a collection of NUMBER's, the following FORALL ... MERGE statement should copy the appropriate data if the record specified by the list exists on both databases.
    forall i in 1..list.count
    merge into tbl@remote t
    using (select * from tbl
    where id = list(i)) s
    on (s.id = t.id)
    when matched then
    update set
    t.status = s.status
    when not matched then
    insert (id, status)
    values (s.id, s.status);
    But this does not work. No exceptions, but target table's record is unchanged and "sql%rowcount" is 0.
    If the target table is in the local database, the exact same statement works:
    forall i in 1..list.count
    merge into tbl2 t
    using (select * from tbl
    where id = list(i)) s
    on (s.id = t.id)
    when matched then
    update set
    t.status = s.status
    when not matched then
    insert (id, status)
    values (s.id, s.status);
    Does anyone have a clue why this may be a problem?
    Both databases are on Oracle 10g.
    Edited by: user652538 on 2009. 6. 12 오전 11:29
    Edited by: user652538 on 2009. 6. 12 오전 11:31
    Edited by: user652538 on 2009. 6. 12 오전 11:45

    Should throw an error in my opinion. The underlying reason for not working is basically because of
    SQL> merge into   t@remote t1
         using   (    select   sys.odcinumberlist (1) from dual) t2
            on   (1 = 1)
    when matched
    then
       update set i = 1
    Error at line 4
    ORA-22804: remote operations not permitted on object tables or user-defined type columnsSame reason as e.g.
    insert into t@remote select * from table(sys.odcinumberlist(1,2,3))doesn't work.

  • Error in Merge statement for Oracle 10gR2

    Hi,
    When I use the MERGE statement to copy data across a database link (from 10gR2 to 10gR2 database), if I have both an update and insert clause it works fine, but if I omit the insert clause and have just update on its own, I get error "ORA-02064: distributed operation not supported".
    Can anyone help on this

    This came up in a thread last week, the 10g versions of MERGE (without INSERT or with DELETE) did not appear to work over DB links.

  • Returning clause in MERGE statement

    Hi ,
    I'm using Oracle 10g Version
    I tried the below code using UPDATE  with Returning Clause & MERGE with Returning Clause .
    I found NO errors while working with UPDATE statement  . The following is the code with UPDATE statement
    DECLARE
       TYPE empno_list IS TABLE OF emp.empno%TYPE;
       vempno_list   empno_list;
    BEGIN
          UPDATE emp
             SET comm = 11
           WHERE deptno IN (SELECT deptno FROM dept)
       RETURNING empno
            BULK COLLECT INTO vempno_list;
       FOR i IN vempno_list.FIRST .. vempno_list.LAST
       LOOP
          DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('Values of EMP ' || vempno_list (i));
       END LOOP;
    END;  
    But getting the error PL/SQL: ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended  when working with MERGE Statement
    declare
    type empno_list  is  table of emp.empno%type;
    vempno_list empno_list;
    begin               
       merge into emp tgt
          using dept src
            on (src.deptno =tgt.deptno)
            when matched then
             update set tgt.comm=12
           returning tgt.empno bulk collect into vempno_list ;
            for i in vempno_list.first .. vempno_list.last loop
                    dbms_output.put_line('Values of EMP '||vempno_list(i) ) ;
            end loop;
    end; 
    Please  suggest me

    Probably because the RETURNING INTO clause doesn't belong to MERGE statement. It's available only for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE. Here is the quote from Oracle Documentation:
    The static RETURNING INTO clause belongs to a DELETE, INSERT, or UPDATE statement. The dynamic RETURNING INTO clause belongs to an EXECUTEIMMEDIATE statement.
    And here's the link.
    RETURNING INTO Clause
    Hope it helps.
    Ishan

  • Merge Statement !!!! difference in Oracle 9i and Oracle XE

    Hi All ,
    I am using a Merge statement for multiplying a column......which works fine in XE but not in Oracle 9i
    CODE
    *======*
    MERGE INTO MULTIPLY T USING
    (SELECT CONV,ITEM FROM MULTIPLY WHERE TYP='P') X ON
    (T.ITEM= X.ITEM)
    WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET T.CONV =X.CONV * T.CONV WHERE TYP!='P'
    What shud I need to do in order to get the same result in Oracle 9i.....
    I understand that I used use one more line WHEN NOT MATCHED ..... but I am getting an Error in the Update statement where clause , whether it is not possible to combine where clause in the Merge statement
    Sample data:
    ITM     CONV     TYP
    ===============
    A     2     
    A     5     
    A     4     P
    A     2     
    Output; which I am getting in Oracle XE but not in Oracle 9i
    ======================================
    ITM CONV TYP
    === ==== =====
    A 2 *4
    A 5 *4
    A 4 P
    A 2*4
    BANNER
    ==========
    Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Product
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    CORE     10.2.0.1.0     Production
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    BANNER_
    Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.5.0 - Production
    PL/SQL Release 9.2.0.5.0 - Production
    CORE     9.2.0.6.0     Production
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 9.2.0.5.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 9.2.0.5.0 - Production
    Can you please guide me on this
    Thanks
    Ananda
    Edited by: Ananda on Nov 13, 2008 3:49 PM
    Edited by: Ananda on Nov 13, 2008 8:56 PM

    Hi ,
    Thanks for ur reply....
    I am getting an Error as Missing Keyword and points to the WHERE in the update statement ..............
    Am i doin anything wrong here in the syntax ...........but if i do the same without the where statement in Update ....... Merge works fine but with wrong output
    Thanks
    Ananda
    Edited by: Ananda on Nov 13, 2008 4:06 PM

  • Oracle 11g merge statement not working properly

    HI I have recently my oracle version to 11.2.0.3 -64 bit . My merge statement is geeting failied saying that invlid identfier at line number 18    
    MERGE INTO peer_index indx        USING staging.stg_peer_filing stg          ON (indx.peer_element_code = stg.fund_code                and indx.index_effective_date = trunc(stg.pricing_date))        WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE          SET indx.filing_date = trunc(stg.filing_date),            indx.reported_net_assets = stg.net_assets,            indx.active_flag = 'N',            indx.parent_index_code = NULL,            indx.update_datetime = systimestamp,            indx.last_update_user_id = user        WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT         (index_code, peer_element_code, filing_date, index_effective_date,          reported_net_assets, active_flag          )        VALUES         ((SELECT pe.index_code_prefix || to_char(stg.pricing_date,'MMRR')           FROM fi_benchmark.peer_element pe           WHERE pe.peer_element_code = stg.fund_code),          stg.fund_code, trunc(stg.filing_date), trunc(stg.pricing_date),          stg.net_assets, 'N'         );
    please help why this is happening .Same query works fine in 10g .

    which line is the line that has the error?
    merge INTO peer_index indx
    USING staging.stg_peer_filing stg
    ON (indx.peer_element_code = stg.fund_code AND indx.index_effective_date = Trunc
    (stg.pricing_date))
    WHEN matched THEN
      UPDATE SET indx.filing_date = Trunc(stg.filing_date),
                 indx.reported_net_assets = stg.net_assets,
                 indx.active_flag = 'N',
                 indx.parent_index_code = NULL,
                 indx.update_datetime = systimestamp,
                 indx.last_update_user_id = USER
    WHEN NOT matched THEN
      INSERT (index_code,
              peer_element_code,
              filing_date,
              index_effective_date,
              reported_net_assets,
              active_flag )
      VALUES ((SELECT pe.index_code_prefix
                      || To_char(stg.pricing_date, 'MMRR')
               FROM   fi_benchmark.peer_element pe
               WHERE  pe.peer_element_code = stg.fund_code),
              stg.fund_code,
              Trunc(stg.filing_date),
              Trunc(stg.pricing_date),
              stg.net_assets,
              'N' );

  • 9i merge statement

    Is anyone aware of how to "add a contraint" to the update section of the merge statement to constrain which records are updated? The "on" statement is basically a join, but in typical update statements, you can add a "where" to constrain which records.

    No, AFAIK that's the downside of MERGE (until 10g where it gets additional syntax) - you can get a lot of unwanted updates where everything already matched. The only workaround I know of is to include a MINUS or equivalent in the USING query, i.e. limit the incoming rowset to exclude rows already matching. (You should also be able to update an updateable inline view, now I think of it, but can't test right now.)

  • Syntax for Merge statement to insert into target and update source

    Hello All,
    I want to use Merge statement to insert records when not matched in my target and update records in source when matched. Is it possible to do using Merge statement.
    create table a (aa number)
    create table b (bb number)
    alter table a add flg char(1)
    merge b as target
    using a as source
    on (target.bb = source.aa)
    when matched then
    update set source.flg = 'Y'
    WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
    insert (target.bb)
    values
    (source.aa)
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    I have no idea about the version of DB, else some new features with respect version can be specified - just for informaitve purpose and to post across the verison of DB in future posts.
    Coming to your issue and requirement.
    if you check the syntax and functionality , then its on Merge on target base only - with respect to Update (matched o columns) and insert (for unmatched columns). Source - as the term is clear. It might not work out on source table.
    - Pavan Kumar N
    - ORACLE OCP - 9i/10g
    https://www.oracleinternals.blogspot.com

  • Two parallel hints in a merge statement

    I am not sure if using the parallel hint in such a way as below would be helpful in parallelizing the query run. Can a parallel hint be used for two different tables in a merge statement like mentioned below?
    MERGE INTO /*+ parallel (TABLE_A,8) */ TABLE_A  A
    USING( SELECT /*+ parallel (TABLE_B,8) */
                            col1,
                            col2
                  FROM TABLE_B
             )  B
    ON A.col1 = B.col1
    WHEN MATCHED THEN
    UPATE ....
    WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
    INSERT ...
    I am using Oracle 10g.
    Thanks

    This does make sense (allowing for "someone else"'s observation about aliases); however MERGE is DML, so you couldn't get the merge phase working in parallel if you didn't also execute
    alter session enable parallel dml;
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis

  • Converting MERGE Statements into Mappings

    Hello All,
    I am an Oracle DBA. New to Oracle Warehouse Builder.
    Now working in Oracle Warehouse Builder 10G R2.
    We have merge statements which needs to be converted into Oracle Warehouse Builder Mappings.
    I created mappings and process flows and deployed the same.
    When i start the process flow it inserted say 150 records to the target table. But when i start the process flow again the number of records becames double.
    How can i use the functionality of merge statement in this case.
    Thanks,
    Salih KM

    Hi,
    When you click on the target table, on the left side panel you will have the option to choose whether to use one of the available constraints on the target table to match on while merging.
    If you do not hav any constraint defined, then choose "No Constraints". Then you have to click on each of the attribute you need to match on, and then from the left panel, select Yes for "Match while updating".
    That should do it.
    HTH
    Mahesh

  • Merge statement

    i would like to know if it is possible to identify the row that is causing the problem when you use a merge statement in pl/sql. i know if you create a cursor and then loop through the data you can identify the column but what about if i have only a merge that will either insert or update. is it possible to identify which row of data cause the problem? thanks

    You can use an Error Logging Table<br>
    <br>
    Nicolas.

  • Merge Statement in PL/SQL

    Hi
    I am using a merge statement where i am updating and inserting records in table 2 from table 1.
    I want to log the no. of rows updated and new rows inserted in the log table.
    If i am not wrong, we can use sql%rowcount but i need help as how to use this statement.
    Please suggest a solution.
    Thanks

    user11018028 wrote:
    Will the sql%rowcount will give the no. of updated rows OR no. of newly inserted rows OR the sum of both in case of a merge statement.Total number of rows that changed (SUM).

  • Question on passing string values to Partition clause in a merge statement

    Hello All,
    I am using the below code to update specific sub-partition data using oracle merge statements.
    I am getting the sub-partition name and passing this as a string to the sub-partition clause.
    The Merge statement is failing stating that the specified sub-partition does not exist. But the sub-partition do exists for the table.
    We are using Oracle 11gr2 database.
    Below is the code which I am using to populate the data.
    declare
    ln_min_batchkey PLS_INTEGER;
    ln_max_batchkey PLS_INTEGER;
    lv_partition_name VARCHAR2 (32767);
    lv_subpartition_name VARCHAR2 (32767);
    begin
    FOR m1 IN ( SELECT (year_val + 1) AS year_val, year_val AS orig_year_val
    FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT
    TO_CHAR (batch_create_dt, 'YYYY') year_val
    FROM stores_comm_mob_sub_temp
    ORDER BY 1)
    ORDER BY year_val)
    LOOP
    lv_partition_name :=
    scmsa_handset_mobility_data_build.fn_get_partition_name (
    p_table_name => 'STORES_COMM_MOB_SUB_INFO',
    p_search_string => m1.year_val);
    FOR m2
    IN (SELECT DISTINCT
    'M' || TO_CHAR (batch_create_dt, 'MM') AS month_val
    FROM stores_comm_mob_sub_temp
    WHERE TO_CHAR (batch_create_dt, 'YYYY') = m1.orig_year_val)
    LOOP
    lv_subpartition_name :=
    scmsa_handset_mobility_data_build.fn_get_subpartition_name (
    p_table_name => 'STORES_COMM_MOB_SUB_INFO',
    p_partition_name => lv_partition_name,
    p_search_string => m2.month_val);
                        DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('The lv_subpartition_name => '||lv_subpartition_name||' and lv_partition_name=> '||lv_partition_name);
    IF lv_subpartition_name IS NULL
    THEN
                             DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('INSIDE IF => '||m2.month_val);
    INSERT INTO STORES_COMM_MOB_SUB_INFO T1 (
    t1.ntlogin,
    t1.first_name,
    t1.last_name,
    t1.job_title,
    t1.store_id,
    t1.batch_create_dt)
    SELECT t2.ntlogin,
    t2.first_name,
    t2.last_name,
    t2.job_title,
    t2.store_id,
    t2.batch_create_dt
    FROM stores_comm_mob_sub_temp t2
    WHERE TO_CHAR (batch_create_dt, 'YYYY') = m1.orig_year_val
    AND 'M' || TO_CHAR (batch_create_dt, 'MM') =
    m2.month_val;
    ELSIF lv_subpartition_name IS NOT NULL
    THEN
                        DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('INSIDE ELSIF => '||m2.month_val);
    MERGE INTO (SELECT *
    FROM stores_comm_mob_sub_info
    SUBPARTITION (lv_subpartition_name)) T1
    USING (SELECT *
    FROM stores_comm_mob_sub_temp
    WHERE TO_CHAR (batch_create_dt, 'YYYY') =
    m1.orig_year_val
    AND 'M' || TO_CHAR (batch_create_dt, 'MM') =
    m2.month_val) T2
    ON (T1.store_id = T2.store_id
    AND T1.ntlogin = T2.ntlogin)
    WHEN MATCHED
    THEN
    UPDATE SET
    t1.postpaid_totalqty =
    (NVL (t1.postpaid_totalqty, 0)
    + NVL (t2.postpaid_totalqty, 0)),
    t1.sales_transaction_dt =
    GREATEST (
    NVL (t1.sales_transaction_dt,
    t2.sales_transaction_dt),
    NVL (t2.sales_transaction_dt,
    t1.sales_transaction_dt)),
    t1.batch_create_dt =
    GREATEST (
    NVL (t1.batch_create_dt, t2.batch_create_dt),
    NVL (t2.batch_create_dt, t1.batch_create_dt))
    WHEN NOT MATCHED
    THEN
    INSERT (t1.ntlogin,
    t1.first_name,
    t1.last_name,
    t1.job_title,
    t1.store_id,
    t1.batch_create_dt)
    VALUES (t2.ntlogin,
    t2.first_name,
    t2.last_name,
    t2.job_title,
    t2.store_id,
    t2.batch_create_dt);
    END IF;
    END LOOP;
    END LOOP;
    COMMIT;
    end;
    Much appreciate your inputs here.
    Thanks,
    MK.

    I've not used partitioning, but I do not see MERGE supporting a variable as a partition name in
    MERGE INTO (SELECT *
    FROM stores_comm_mob_sub_info
    SUBPARTITION (lv_subpartition_name)) T1
    USING ... I suspect it is looking for a partition called lv_subpartition_name.
    I also don't see why you need that partition name - the ON clause should be able to identify the partition's criteria.

Maybe you are looking for