MKPF and MSEG table

What is diff between MKPF and MSEG table ?

Dear Balaji,
In MKPF you will get to know the transaction code which was used for posting the material document.
In MSEG,you will get to know the the item details from which it was posted along with the quantity and amount in LC.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Similar Messages

Optimization of Join statement between MKPF and MSEG table for improving pe

Hi All,
I had a issue where we are executing one custom report and it is getting timed out after 45 minutes. We further executed with trace on and got to the conclusion with the help of BASIS that about 42 minutes of the 45 minutes tracetime are spent by a join over the tables MKPF en MSEG.
This join is done by the abap statement:
SELECT mkpf~mblnr
         mkpf~mjahr
         mkpf~bldat
         mkpf~blart
         mseg~matnr
         mseg~werks
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_matdoc_we
    FROM mkpf INNER JOIN mseg ON mkpfmblnr = msegmblnr
                             AND mkpfmjahr = msegmjahr
FOR ALL entries IN i_list
   WHERE mkpf~mblnr BETWEEN lv_interval-fromnumber
                        AND lv_interval-tonumber
     AND mkpf~blart = 'WE'
     AND mkpf~bldat LE gv_last_day_fisc_period
     AND mseg~matnr = i_list-matnr
     AND mseg~werks IN s_werks.
Here, I_LIST comprises of stock for specific period as entered in the selection screen for that particular Material and plant
LV_INTERVAL is range of all goods receipts for material and gv_last_day_fisc_period is current date.
During the tracetime this statement was executed more than 20.000 times, until the transaction timed out.
The individual executions of this select stmnt varied (roughly) between 50 and 1200 miliseconds. (depends wheter the requested database block is in the buffercache or must be read from disk).
The acesspath used to execute the query ( see below) is optimal, given the present indexes.
Index MSEG~M is covering al the specified selection criteria for MSEG.
Index MKPF-0 is used to search the specified MBLNR criterium in MKPF.
The remaining selection criteria MKPF-BLART and MKPF-BLDAT are not indexed, and imho this would also not make sense for this query.
BLART has only 3 different values n the MKPF table, and the selected value 'WE' has more than 1 million occurences.
BLDAT is selected with =<20110903, so this is not distinctive as well.
Can any one suggest some better way to write this query.
Regards,
Subhajit

Actually there are 2 select statements where JOIN have been introduced and especially the time out is occurring in the second JOIN.
Find all goods receipts for material
PERFORM get_number_range_matdoc USING '03'
                               CHANGING lv_interval.
SELECT mkpf~mblnr
         mkpf~mjahr
         mkpf~bldat
         mkpf~blart
         mseg~matnr
         mseg~werks
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_matdoc_we
    FROM mkpf INNER JOIN mseg ON mkpfmblnr = msegmblnr
                             AND mkpfmjahr = msegmjahr
FOR ALL entries IN i_list
   WHERE mkpf~mblnr BETWEEN lv_interval-fromnumber
                        AND lv_interval-tonumber
     AND mkpf~blart = 'WE'
     AND mkpf~bldat LE gv_last_day_fisc_period
AND mseg~matnr = i_list-matnr
    AND mseg~werks IN s_werks.
CLEAR lv_interval.
PERFORM get_number_range_matdoc USING '02'
                               CHANGING lv_interval.
Find all goods issues for material
SELECT mkpf~mblnr
         mkpf~mjahr
         mkpf~bldat
         mkpf~blart
         mseg~matnr
         mseg~werks
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_matdoc_wa
    FROM mkpf INNER JOIN mseg ON mkpfmblnr = msegmblnr
                             AND mkpfmjahr = msegmjahr
FOR ALL entries IN i_list
   WHERE mkpf~mblnr BETWEEN lv_interval-fromnumber
                        AND lv_interval-tonumber
     AND ( mkpfblart = 'WA' OR mkpfblart = 'WI' )
     AND mkpf~bldat LE gv_last_day_fisc_period
AND mseg~matnr = i_list-matnr
     AND mseg~bwart NE '561'
     AND mseg~bwart NE '562'
     AND mseg~bwart NE '961'
AND mseg~bwart NE '962'
AND mseg~werks IN s_werks.
Mainly the second JOIN is creating the problem... In the backend ORACLE is being used as database.
Please suggest how I can improve the performance of these joins as its taking more than 45 mins..

Info about mkpf and mseg

I need to modify a report that brings all the production of all our materias for a given period of time.
The code joins both tables mkpf and mseg and ask for the date:
mkpf-budat between s_budat-low and s_budat-high
This query is taking A LOT of time and I need to optimize it. All of the fields needed are in the mseg, but the date is in mkpf. In mseg there is a field called production date (hdat) Is this field the same than the budat located in mkpf (I want to query only one table)? If not, what do I have to do to optimize my query????
TIA
Query:
select smblnr smjahr sbwart smatnr swerks smenge
appending corresponding fields of table t_mseg
from mseg as s inner join mkpf as k
on smblnr = kmblnr and
smjahr = kmjahr
where
( sbwart eq lit_101 or sbwart eq lit_102 )
and s~matnr in s_matnr
and s~werks in s_werks_full
and k~budat between s_budat-low and s_budat-high
and s~bukrs = p_bukrs.

Well MSEG has an index on MATNR and WERKS. Try changing the order of the where:
select s~mblnr s~mjahr s~bwart s~matnr s~werks s~menge
appending corresponding fields of table t_mseg
from mseg as s inner join mkpf as k
on s~mblnr = k~mblnr and
s~mjahr = k~mjahr
where s~matnr in s_matnr
and s~werks in s_werks_full
and ( s~bwart eq lit_101 or s~bwart eq lit_102 )
and k~budat between s_budat-low and s_budat-high
and s~bukrs = p_bukrs.
Also - make sure s_matnr is not empty.
Also make sure s_matnr is either 'I'ncluding either ranges or single values. Indexes don't work very well with 'E'xcluding, patterns or NE.
Rob
Message was edited by: Rob Burbank

Link b/w QALS and MSEG TABLE

hi,
i want to make a link up between QALS AND MSEG table as i want to those inspection lot which have the UD = REJECTED and stored in SC01 etc storage locations. Till now i am able to find that the Item which are rejected having material documents present in the MSEG table but not present in QALS.
I had tried to make a link up with fields such as MATRN,CHARG,KDAUF, KDPOS etc.. but the right data is not displayed in it.
Please provide me guidelines to solve this problem.

this i Functional question asked at wrong place .
but i will gice you the relation :
MSEG: Document Segment: Material
Fields:      MBLNR
     MJAHR
     ZEILE
Relation :
MATNR      EBELN     EBELP MJAHR MBLNR
QALS: Inspection lot record
Fields:      PRUEFLOS
can use this table also
QAVE: Inspection processing
Fields:      PRUEFLOS
                KZART
     ZAEHLER
rgds aryan
Edited by: Aryan@sap on Jun 4, 2009 8:21 AM

MB51 : add field not included in MKPF or MSEG table

Dear.
I need to show a new field in MB51.
This field isnu2019t included in MKPF or MSEG table.
I cannot add it in Customizing , do you know an exit for doing this ?
Thanks.

Hi There,
The reports MB51/MB5B read the data from the tables MKPF/MSEG, so if you wish to add a new field in MB51 you need to add the field into one of these tables. Unfortunately there is no such exit.
For Inventory Management, SAP provides the following customer exits:
MB_CF001 Updating of material document data upon posting
MBCF0002 Filling the item text in the material document
MBCFC003 Maintaining batch master data upon goods movements
MBCFC004 Maintaining batch specifications upon goods movements
MBCF0005 Filling the item data on goods receipt/ issue slips
MBCF0006 Transferring the number of the WBS element for subcontracting
MBCF0007 Posting a reservation
MBCF0009 Filling the Storage location field
IQSM0007 Serial numbers, user exit for goods movements
XMBF0001 Stock determination: - changing the stock determination rule -
Adjusting the stock determination item table
Kind Regards,
Elaine.

The pur.doc numbers are nt displaying in besg and mseg tables

hi experts!
The bseg and mseg tables having the field(ebeln) of purchasing doc.but is nt having any value.the field is empty in table.pl anyone can tel me wat is the reason,is it configuartion pbm or wat else.wat is the soln for this.
Thanks!.

Hi,
if FI doc is getting generated ie...while migo and miro, then entry must hit the table....if its not hitting.....then you need to debug it and find out the reason.
reg
Arun

Oracle Hint on Table MKPF and MSEG : force index MSEG~M to be utilize

Hi Experts, I'm quite new to ABAP performance tuning, I try to put details as much as I can in my question below, just to have a quick overview of my problem below, I want to use/force in my SQL below to force the utilization of index MSEG~M.
added an Oracle Hint forcing index MSEG~M
SELECT MATNR BWART MENGE
FROM   MKPF
INNER JOIN MSEG
     ON MKPFMANDT EQ MSEGMANDT
    AND MKPFMBLNR EQ MSEGMBLNR
    AND MKPFMJAHR EQ MSEGMJAHR
   INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE T_MSEG2
WHERE MKPF~BUDAT IN S_GSTRP    "(index bud should be used)
   AND MSEG~MJAHR IN R_DOCYEAR
   AND BWART IN ('931', '932',
                  '901', '902',
                  '701', '702',
                  '703', '704',
                  '707', '708',
                  '711', '712',
                  '713', '714',
                  '715', '716',
                  '717', '718',
                  '551', '552',
                  '553', '554',
                  '555', '556') "ZZCHK: Constants Not Applicable
         AND MATNR IN R_MATNR3
         AND MATNR IN R_COMPNTS
         AND WERKS EQ P_WERKS
%_hints oracle u2018INDEX(u201CMKPFu201D u201CMSEG~Mu201D)u2019.
Note: I'm assuming that you'll take not some comments on further enhancement:
- " INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS "
- use of field symbols
- I didn't modify it yet since my focus if for MSEG~M
- cannot make material number as mandatory field
Objective: Force to use index MSEG~M
Problem:
After adding the Oracle Hint, I did the analysis in ST05 and it seems like index M is still not being forcefully
utilize instead MSEG~0 is being used.
I replaced the Oracle Hint with:
%_hints oracle u2018INDEX(u201CT_01u201D u201CMSEG~Mu201D)u2019.
In ST05, I can get see that index MSEG~M is now being utilize BUT worst thing happened after applying this, the program timed out.
I already take a look on the following Notes: 129385, 130480, 772497, 162034, 818321 but nothing seems to be helpful in my problem.
Questions:
1. In syntax %_hints oracle u2018INDEX(u201CT_01u201D u201CMSEG~Mu201D)u2019. T_01 stands for MKPF right which is the first table, do you what's the reason for the program time out after adding this Oracle Hint? Is this the proper syntax?
2. How can I force in my code to use index MSEG~M without any program timeout?
For the whole source code of my question above, please see the link:
http://rapidshare.com/files/211740852/ZDXX0028.txt.html

Hi Thomas, thanks with the prompt reply (even if it's Saturday )
Yes, MKPF~BUD is being used.
The budat selection is narrowed to 28 days though users can input any date range, a warning message will just be displayed if budat selection exceeded.
Yes, optimizer usually chooses the right index; I'm not in as the same experience as you are though, but I find it interesting that after I added the Oracle hints (several combination) the performance of the program was optimize up to 40% to 50%.
I uploaded a detailed SQL trace and the ABAP change done in my program, if you'll notice in the summary of the changes, after adding some hints, the duration of the program was improved..
(SQL Trace Summary of my program) this worth taking a look
http://rapidshare.com/files/211870091/ZD28_SQL_Trace.zip.html
I made a custom index in MSEG, but unfortunately I doubt that it will be approve by our performance capacity team. But I somehow have a hunch that this will further optimize the program.
MSEG~Z03
MANDT     Client
WERKS     Plant
BWART     Movement Type (Inventory Management)
LGORT     Storage Location
What do you think Thomas and SAP experts?
**Sorry for pasting the whole ST05 result
     SELECT STATEMENT          ( Estimated Costs = 131.250 , Estimated #Rows = 450 )
                    6          FILTER
                    Filter Predicates
                    5          NESTED LOOPS
                    ( Estim. Costs = 131.249 , Estim. #Rows = 450 )
          Estim. CPU-Costs = 1.885.249.948 Estim. IO-Costs = 129.700
                    2          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID          MKPF
                    ( Estim. Costs = 14.442 , Estim. #Rows = 288.570 )
               Estim. CPU-Costs = 206.401.140 Estim. IO-Costs = 14.272
               1          INDEX RANGE SCAN          MKPF~BUD
                    ( Estim. Costs = 655 , Estim. #Rows = 519.426 )
          Search Columns: 2
          Estim. CPU-Costs = 30.640.783 Estim. IO-Costs = 630
          Access Predicates          Filter Predicates
                    4          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID          MSEG
                    Estim. CPU-Costs = 5.818 Estim. IO-Costs = 0
          Filter Predicates
          3          INDEX RANGE SCAN          MSEG~0
               Search Columns: 3
     Estim. CPU-Costs = 1.564 Estim. IO-Costs = 0
     Access Predicates          Filter Predicates

Querry for MKPF and MSEG

Hi,
In mY report,
I have BUDAT as select-options and
         WERKS as select-options.
Based on MBLNR, MJAHR from MKPF into table it_mkpf where Budat in s_BUDAT.
after that I am fetching MSEG data using for all entries in it_mkpf where werks in s_werks.
for low date range it is working fine.
For higher date range ,I am getting around 2 Lacs of records in MKPF , but while fetching MSEG ,Its getting dump with message endless Loop.
How can increase my performance.
Is there any Function Module to fetch data.
Can anybody suggest me.
Thanks
kumar n

Hi Kumar,
I have the same situation,
where I will have 1.5 lakhs minimum records from MKPF every month,,,
now my total database is nearly 35 million records till date from 1998.
and getting records from MKPF is not difficult its very easy even 35 million records,,,
But after getting from MSEG by MKPF is Hell,,,,
but I see Joins are far better , best in these cases,,,
So after that i have written a Code snippet in "Code-gallery" in SAP -Wiki, with title Joins are Better in some cases
Author: Dileep Kumar
Submitted: 11.02.2009
Description : Join Statement is the best in some cases as shown below than For All Entries. So Dont Forget about Joins Simply. Keep trying with joins
sometimes, where you can get a better performance.
Dont forget about joins simply like that due to performances. Now in this case(A Business Requirement) Joins is the best than FOR ALL ENTRIES.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TY_MKPF ,
        MBLNR TYPE MKPF-MBLNR,          "Material document
        MJAHR TYPE MKPF-MJAHR,
        BUDAT TYPE MKPF-BUDAT,          "Posting Date in the document
      END OF TY_MKPF.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TY_MSEG1 ,
        MJAHR TYPE MKPF-MJAHR,
        BUDAT TYPE MKPF-BUDAT,          "Posting Date in the document
        MBLNR TYPE MSEG-MBLNR,          "Material document
        MATNR TYPE MSEG-MATNR,          "Material Number
        ZEILE TYPE MSEG-ZEILE,          "Item in material document
        BWART TYPE MSEG-BWART,          "Movement Type
        CHARG TYPE MSEG-CHARG,          "Batch Number
        EBELN TYPE MSEG-EBELN,          "PO #
        SHKZG TYPE MSEG-SHKZG,          "Debit/Credit Indicator
        MENGE TYPE MSEG-MENGE,          "Quantity
        MEINS TYPE MSEG-MEINS,          "UOM
        DMBTR TYPE MSEG-DMBTR,          "Amount in local currency
        WAERS TYPE MSEG-WAERS,          "Currency Key
      END OF TY_MSEG1.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TY_MSEG ,
        MBLNR TYPE MSEG-MBLNR,          "Material document
        MATNR TYPE MSEG-MATNR,          "Material Number
        ZEILE TYPE MSEG-ZEILE,          "Item in material document
        BWART TYPE MSEG-BWART,          "Movement Type
        CHARG TYPE MSEG-CHARG,          "Batch Number
        EBELN TYPE MSEG-EBELN,          "PO #
        SHKZG TYPE MSEG-SHKZG,          "Debit/Credit Indicator
        MENGE TYPE MSEG-MENGE,          "Quantity
        MEINS TYPE MSEG-MEINS,          "UOM
        DMBTR TYPE MSEG-DMBTR,          "Amount in local currency
        WAERS TYPE MSEG-WAERS,          "Currency Key
      END OF TY_MSEG.
DATA : IT_MSEG TYPE TABLE OF TY_MSEG, WA_MSEG LIKE LINE OF IT_MSEG.
DATA : IT_MKPF TYPE TABLE OF TY_MKPF, WA_MKPF LIKE LINE OF IT_MKPF.
DATA : IT_MSEG1 TYPE TABLE OF TY_MSEG1, WA_MSEG1 LIKE LINE OF IT_MSEG1.
SELECT-OPTIONS :
   S_BUDAT FOR MKPF-BUDAT," OBLIGATORY,       " Posting Date.
   S_MATNR FOR MSEG-MATNR," OBLIGATORY.       " Material No.
   S_WERKS FOR MSEG-WERKS." OBLIGATORY,       " Plant
Start-of-Selection.
*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
    SELECT MBLNR MJAHR BUDAT
      INTO TABLE IT_MKPF
      FROM MKPF
      WHERE BUDAT IN S_BUDAT.
IF IT_MKPF IS NOT INITIAL.
    SELECT MBLNR MATNR ZEILE BWART CHARG EBELN SHKZG MENGE MEINS DMBTR WAERS
      FROM MSEG
      INTO TABLE IT_MSEG
      FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_MKPF
      WHERE MBLNR = IT_MKPF-MBLNR AND
            MJAHR = IT_MKPF-MJAHR AND
            MATNR IN S_MATNR AND
            WERKS IN S_WERKS .
ENDIF.
*compared to the above For all entries, below Join can perform well &
*Good for 2nd & third runs are much faster as they store data in Buffer memory..
*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
SELECT AMJAHR ABUDAT BMBLNR BMATNR BZEILE BBWART B~CHARG
          BEBELN BSHKZG BMENGE BMEINS BDMBTR BWAERS
          INTO TABLE IT_MSEG1
          FROM MKPF AS A INNER JOIN MSEG AS B ON AMBLNR = BMBLNR AND
                                                 AMJAHR = BMJAHR
          WHERE A~BUDAT IN S_BUDAT AND
                B~MATNR IN S_MATNR AND
                B~WERKS IN S_WERKS .
*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Thanks & regards,
Dileep .C

SQ01 Query Help for (MKPF and MSEG)

Is their anyway to have the field MSEG-ERFMG show up on the query results as postive or negative color or use a "-" or "+". Need to try and show whether is was a negative or postive movement.

F1 help for MSEG-SHKZG
Debit/credit indicator in revaluation
This indicator is used for internal program control.
Please do not change the entry in this field.
Any changes made could lead to program errors or terminations.
I guess the "sign" is defined trough this field ("S" - sollen (debit), "H" - haben (credit)). If my assumption is true, you won't be able to see + / - in MSEG-ERFMG simply because this field contains no information on the sign.
Using ABAP code you can solve it (or in SQ01 you can use calculated field in your query...I'm not sure you can define that calculated field to cover your requirement...).
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 12, 2009 11:20 PM

To link MKPF and BKPF Tables.

Hi Experts,
I basically need to retieve all the accounting documents posted for a particular material document. How is this possible ?
Regards,
Sunitha

Step 1
GET KEY FIELDS FROM MKPF namely
MKPF-MBLNR
MKPF-MJAHR
Now CONCATENATE these fields into say STR1
SELECT all records from BKPF where
BKPF-AWKEY = STR1
You get the corresponding FI record

Procees for upload field in mkpf&mseg table

Hi friends,
i had return the code for uploading two fields in mkpf and mseg table .when i am executing through f8 the updated value is not founding when we checkd through debugging the value is updating and appering in screen plz tell me how i will solve the issue.
for u r referenece i am sending the code what i had return in logic.
types: BEGIN OF it_tab,
        prueflos(16) type c,
        MBLNR type mblnr,
        TYP type QAMBTYPE,
        END OF it_tab.
      types: begin of it_tab1.
       include type mkpf.
      types: END OF it_tab1.
      types:begin of it_mseg.
      include type mseg.
      types:end of it_mseg.
*        end of it_tab1.
     types: ts_tab1 type STANDARD TABLE OF it_tab1.
     types: ts_mseg type STANDARD TABLE OF it_mseg.
     data: ts_tab type STANDARD TABLE OF it_tab,
           wa_tab type it_tab,
           wa_tab1 type it_tab1,
           ts_tab2 type ts_tab1,
           ts_mseg type ts_mseg,
           wa_mseg type it_mseg,
           it_tab12 type it_tab1 OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
       select PRUEFLOS mblnr typ from QAMB
         into table ts_tab where prueflos = it_final-prueflos
                              and    typ = '3'.
         if ts_tab[] is not INITIAL.
           sort ts_tab[] by mblnr.
          select * from mkpf into TABLE ts_tab2 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ts_tab where mblnr = ts_tab-mblnr.
            if ts_tab2[] is not INITIAL.
              sort ts_tab2[] by mblnr.
              select * from mseg into table ts_mseg FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ts_tab2 where mblnr = ts_tab2-mblnr.
                endif.
            endif.
         loop at ts_tab into wa_tab .
           READ TABLE ts_tab2 into wa_tab1 with key mblnr = wa_tab-mblnr.
           wa_tab1-FRBNR = it_data1-FRBNR.
           if sy-subrc eq 0.
            wait UP TO 2 SECONDS.
          update mkpf from wa_tab1.
          COMMIT WORK .
           endif.
           read table ts_mseg into wa_mseg with key mblnr = wa_tab1-mblnr.
           wa_mseg-sgtxt = it_data1-trucknum.
           if sy-subrc eq 0.
             wait UP TO 2 seconds.
          update mseg from wa_mseg.
          COMMIT WORK .
           endif.
           ENDLOOP.
thanks in advance,
siva
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on May 13, 2011 1:37 PM - please use code tags

it is added in bdc code only.
now i will explaing proccess of bdc . this is used for converting meterial type from 103 movement type to 105 move ment type so whaterver data they got through 103 movemet type (migo data) they are uploading through xl and uploading through our bdc
after uploading they are used QA11 tcode .record is done for this after recording completed it is converting 103 to 105 move ment type and it is displaying message like succesfully proceesed . inthis 105 movement type we are not getting bill of lading no and truck no so i am updating these two field in this table so i done like this so do u get any idea to update the fields in another way means plz help me
siva.

Tables MARDH and MSEG - daily stock position

Hi gurus of MM.
I'm from BW and posted a thread about data from MM:
Thread: 1876587
As I understand, I can calculate the stock for a given date directly from tables MKPF (field BUDAT) and MSEG.
MSEG has normal movement and also the initial stock value (posted as movement type: field BWART = 561), so this is possible.
But I still didn't understand what's the logic to fill the different types of stock: fields LABST (unrestricted), UMLME (in transfer), INSME (quality inspection), EINME (restricted), SPEME (blocked) and RETME (returns).
With MSEG I arrived to the total value.
Which is coherent with the values that I found in MARD and MARDH (the sum of these types of stock).
What's the logic to distribute total value among these types of stock ???
Thanks in advance.
César Menezes

Dear Amit
I'm looking for technical information.
But if you can also indicate some documents that explain the business rules I'd appreciate.
The technical question is:
Using tables MKPF and MSEG (basically fields BUDAT, MENGE and SHKZG) I can arrive to the values in tables MARD and MARDH.
But until now I can arrive only to the totals of MARD and MARDH (the sum of fields LABST, UMLME, INSME, EINME, SPEME and RETME).
The question is: what's the logic to arrive to each type of stock: LABST (unrestricted) and so on.
I'm doing this because I need a daily stock position.
MARD has a position at the moment, I can't use it to a report like: stock at day 10 plus movement of day 11 equal stock at day 11.
MARDH has a montly, not a daily position.
And I saw that I can arrive to daily stock position using only MKPF and MSEG.
Thanks
César Menezes

Performance issue with MSEG table in Production

Hi,
I have written a report with 4 select queries.
First i am selecting data from VBRK table in i_vbrk. Then for all entries in i_vbrk, i am fetching records from VBRP into i_vbrp table. Then for all entries in i_vbrp, records are fetched from MKPF into i_mkpf. Then, finally for all entries in i_mkpf, records are fetched from MSEG into i_mseg table.
Performance of this report is good in Quality system, but it is very poor in Production systems. It is taking more than 20 mins to get executed. MSEG table query is taking most of the time.
I have done indexing and packet sizing on MSEG table, but still performace issue persists. So, cqan you please let me know if there is any way by which performace of the program can be improved???
Please help.
Thanks,
Archana

Hi Archana,
I was having the same issue for MKPF and MSEG , I am using INNER JOIN Condition .
SELECT
mkpf~mblnr
mkpf~mjahr
mkpf~budat
mkpf~usnam
mkpf~bktxt
mseg~zeile
mseg~bwart
mseg~prctr
mseg~matnr
mseg~werks
mseg~lgort
mseg~menge
mseg~meins
mseg~ebeln
mseg~sgtxt
mseg~shkzg
mseg~dmbtr
mseg~waers
mseg~sobkz
mkpf~xblnr
mkpf~frbnr
mseg~lifnr
INTO TABLE xmseg
FROM mkpf
INNER JOIN mseg
ON mkpfmandt EQ msegmandt AND
mkpfmblnr EQ msegmblnr AND
mkpfmjahr EQ msegmjahr
WHERE mkpf~vgart IN se_vgart
AND   mkpf~budat IN se_budat
AND   mkpf~usnam IN se_usnam
AND   mkpf~bktxt IN se_bktxt
AND   mseg~bwart IN se_bwart
AND   mseg~matnr IN se_matnr
AND   mseg~werks IN se_werks
AND   mseg~lgort IN se_lgort
AND   mseg~sobkz IN se_sobkz
AND   mseg~lifnr IN se_lifnr
%_HINTS ORACLE '&SUBSTITUTE VALUES&'.
But still I have a issue in performance , Can anybody give some suggestions , please .
Regards,
Shiv

Mver, mseg table

WHZ THE relationship between mver and mseg tables?
i want to link up mara and mkpf tables.

Check the link
material consumption history MVER
Regarding MSEG ??
Material Consumption at Storage Location level
Thanks
Seshu

Performance tuning fro a select stmnt consisting of View and DB Table

Hi Gurus ,
I have a select query which is consuming a lot of time for execution. Well it selects details from a custom view ZV_MKPF_MSEG (join of MKPF and MSEG) and table MARA as following
SELECT GI~BUKRS                                   "company code
         GI~WERKS                                    "Plant
         GI~BWART                                    "Movement Type
         GI~BUDAT                                    "Posting Date
         GI~MBLNR                                    "Mat Doc Number
         GI~ZEILE                                    "Item
         GI~KOSTL                                    "cost center
         GI~MENGE                                    "Quantity
         GI~SHKZG                                    "Debit credit ind
         MAMATKL MAMATNR MA~MEINS
         INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE PT_GITAB
         FROM ZV_MKPF_MSEG AS GI INNER JOIN MARA AS MA
              ON MAMATNR = GIMATNR
         WHERE GI~BUKRS IN S_BUKRS AND
               GI~WERKS IN S_WERKS AND
               GI~BUDAT IN S_BUDAT AND
               GI~BWART IN S_BWART AND
               GI~MBLNR IN S_MBLNR AND
               MA~MATKL IN S_MATKL
         ORDER BY GIMBLNR GIZEILE.
how we should manipulate this query in order to increase the perfromance ? And could anybody give some idea about the use of indexes for a table since both MSEG and MKPF tables have indexes attached.
Thanx
Kylie
Edited by: kylietisha on Jun 7, 2010 5:01 PM

Moderator message - Please see Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum before posting - post locked
Rob

MKPF and MSEG table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for