Mobile Me & Best Practice

I may be the only one here but i philosophically see all iOS firmware as work in progress but one none the less that leads from the front. In saying this i wish to make known and get feedback from others of my thinking on best practice for the Mobile Me function that Apple has kindly made free:
It is of vital importance that legal owners of the iPhone have a _password lock_ on their hardware. If not then a dishonest person just needs to turn the Find My iPhone function off under the Mail setting; this would be easily overlooked otherwise and make the feature redundant.
Am I right in this assessment? Do others concur?

Actually, a passcode is unnecessary, you simply need a restrictions password, and to disable the changing of accounts.
And to address @cyclone34's point, if you have physical access to a device, then yes, you can totally override everything. As some of the greatest hackers (and anti-hackers) have stated, there are many arguments over how to make something secure and anti-hackable, but the number one agreed upon way to ensure not letting your information fall into the wrong hands is to not allow physical access by anyone except yourself.
Some may attempt to negate his point by stating that if the phone is introduced to a new computer and the iPhone has a passcode lock on it, you'll need the passcode to sync. Well, yes, but you can put the iPhone into DFU mode, to override this.

Similar Messages

  • Mobile App Best Practice When Using SQLite Database

    Hello,
    I have a mobile app that has several views.
    Each view calls a different method of a Database custom class that basically returns the array from a synchronous execute call.
    So, each view has a creationComplete handler in which I have something like this:
    var db:Database=new Database();
    var connectResponse:Object=db.connect('path-to-database');
    if(connectResponse.allOK)//allOK is true if connection was succesful
       //Do stuff with data
    else
       //Present error notice
    However this seems reduntant. Is it OK to do this once (connect the the database) in the Main Application file?
    The do something like FlexGlobals.topLevelApplication.db?
    And even generally speaking, constants and other things that I would need throughout the app, can be placed in the main app? As a best practice, not technically as technically it is possible.
    Thank you.

    no, I only connect it once
    I figured I wanted several views to use it so made it static and singleton as I only have 1 database
    I actually use synchronous calls but there is a sync with remote mysql database function, hence the eventdispatcher
    ... although I am thinking it might be better to use Async and dispatch a custom event and have the relative views subscribe

  • Orientation strategy for mobile. Best practice?

    Hi all.
    What's the best way to handle orientation changes on a mobile device when you have several child movies loaded in the background?
    I'm thinking:
    1. Each child movie have it's own listener for an orientation change. (calls function to adjust graphics as needed so they are ready when the movie is added to stage)
    or
    2. One primary listener on the main stage which the child movies respond to.
    Thoughts? Am I way off-base on this?
    Thanks!
    JP
    PS. Don't think this matters, but just in case, the app is for iOS only.

    It's not difficult to make your own event, which you can use custom information in it. I prefer this method.
    Here's a full example of a custom event I use all the time called AppEvent:
    package
         import flash.events.Event;
         public class AppEvent extends Event
              public static const APP_EVENT:String = "appevent";
              public var params:Object;  // where you stick your custom goodies
              public function AppEvent(type:String, params:Object, bubbles:Boolean = false, cancelable:Boolean = false)
                   super(type, bubbles, cancelable);
                   this.params = params;
              public override function clone():Event
                   return new AppEvent(type, this.params, bubbles, cancelable);
              public override function toString():String
                   return formatToString("AppEvent", "params", "type", "bubbles", "cancelable");
    To dispatch this event with a piece of data, you'd do this:
    this.dispatchEvent(new AppEvent(AppEvent.APP_EVENT, {customVarA:"something",customVarB:"something"}));
    In that example I sent "customVarA" and "customVarB" both set to the string "something". I'd read it like this:
    function someHandler(e:AppEvent):void
         trace("A: " + e.params.customVarA + ", B: " + e.params.customVarB);
    It sends an object through called e.params. You set whatever objects you want inside it.
    To add a listener from a child clip just use the .parent property.
    e.g.
    this.parent.addEventListener(AppEvent.APP_EVENT, someHandler, false, 0, true);
    Any time the parent dispatches the event the child will get it, with whatever custom parameters you need.

  • Best practices for "designer - developer" interaction in Flex Mobile

    Hi,
    I'm starting development of a mobile software application and Flex Mobile is the platform I've chosen for that.
    What is the best practice / recommended workflow for designer-developer interaction? For example in web application the designer provides HTML/CSS templates to the developer which integrates them in the Web Application. What is the analogue in Flex Mobile? What should I request as input from the designer?
    I'll appreciate any hints, links, advises or previous experience on the topic.
    Thanks!
    Best Regards,
    Dinko

    If you're using Adaptive Web Design (CSS3 media queries), you can maintain one site with CSS Layouts optimized for different device widths.
    http://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/articles/introducing-media-queries.html
    jQuery Mobile
    http://jquerymobile.com/
    If you're actually running separate web sites for mobile and non-mobile devices, have a look at this recent discussion:
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/4177360#4177360
    IMO, there is nothing wrong with providing links for mobile and non-mobile users to choose which site they would prefer to use -- especially for tablets who may have an interest in both.
    Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    Web | Graphics | Print | Media  Specialists 
    http://alt-web.com/
    http://twitter.com/altweb

  • Best practice converting local laptop accounts to Mobile Accounts with PHD

    Hi,
    what is the best practice to convert local laptop users (with different UIDs than their network account) to mobile accounts? Especially when the local dir should not be synced in whole (just Documents, Library). Client and server are 10.5, network accounts are on NFS.
    I tried creating the mobile account with a minimal network directory (Library etc. ) and then move the original folders into place, but this didn't work out (the sync info was overwritte somewhere ..)
    Christian

    I think your best bet is to copy the home folder off the laptop to the user share on the server. Then with WGM create the same user and the apply all permissions of the network user to the copied folder.
    Once you have that create your settings for the PHD and then go to the laptop. There you will setup the laptop and bind it to the directory, have that user login (might want to do this on a lan, not airport) and then it will move all the data across to that laptop, and since the network user (same as the local) owns that folder everything should work. If the password is the same then OS X should fix the login and keychain password, so saved forms or email password would show up.
    I did this same thing for 20 OS 10.4 client laptops. Took me a while to get all of this in place but will spare you the running around...
    hope that helps

  • Best Practice Regarding Large Mobility Groups

    I was reading the WLC Best Practices and was wondering if anyone could put a number to this statement regarding the largest number of APs, end users, and controllers which can contained in a Mobility Group.
    We would be deploying WiSMs in two geographically dispersed data centers. No voice is being used or is planned.
    "Do not create unnecessarily large mobility groups. A mobility group should only have all controllers that have access points in the area where a client can physically roam, for example all controllers with access points in a building. If you have a scenario where several buildings are separated, they should be broken into several mobility groups. This saves memory and CPU, as controllers do not need to keep large lists of valid clients, rogues and access points inside the group, which would not interact anyway.
    Keep in mind that WLC redundancy is achieved through the mobility groups. So it might be necessary in some situations to increase the mobility group size, including additional controllers for
    redundancy (N+1 topology for example)."
    I would be interested in hearing about scenarios where a Catalyst 6509 with 5 WiSM blades is deployed in data centers which back each other up for cases of disaster recovery.
    Can I have one large Mobility group? This would be easier to manage.
    or
    Would it be better to back up each blade with a blade in the second data center? This would call for smaller Mobility Groups.
    Be glad to elaborate further if anyone has a similar experience and needs more information.
    All responses will be rated.
    Thanks in advance.
    Paul

    Well, that is a large group indeed, and I would say most organizations use nested groups instead of adding these behemoths to the directory as they are quite difficult to work with.  If it's a one-time thing, you could create it manually in bite-sized
    chunks with LDIF or the like, so that FIM only has to do small delta changes afterwards.
    The 5,000 member limit mostly applies to groups prior to the change to linked value storage.  What is your forest functional level, and have you verified that this group is using linked values?
    Steve Kradel, Zetetic LLC

  • Creating web page now, want mobile app later.  Best practices?

    I've been writing actionscript on and off for a long time now, but have always used the Flash IDE.  I'm hoping to build my next project using Flex Builder because I'm more of a code jockey than a designer.  I've got Flex Builder 3.
    I'm involved with a modest mobile game project.  We're hoping to build a simple game and it seemed logical to do a quick-and-dirty version of the game in actionscript so the project members and a select audience might be able to evaluate the game dynamics in a browser before we spend a gazillion dollars building the game for iPhone and Android platforms.
    It is my sincerest hope that I might develop my code in Actionscript and MXML and use this code to build mobile apps for iPhone, iPad, and Android without having to rewrite everything in Objective C or Java or whatever other language might be in play at the time we get it finished.
    Q1: Is this possible?
    Q2: Can anyone sketch out for me an overview of the process whereby one exports a Flex project to a mobile app platform?
    Q3: Can any seasoned developers tell me the big "gotchas" to watch out for?  For instance, I'd hate to incorporate a component that would not export to one of the mobile platforms.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Thanks for your helpful post.  That's encouraging to know that I might be able to get the Flex 4.5 SDK without upgrading my IDE.  I'm a big fan of Eclipse and am considering trying to just use Eclipse with a Flex plugin. I certainly hope I might be able to download the latest eclipse and install a 4.5SDK plugin.  Might as well shoot straight for the latest SDK, right?  It would be great to avoid the $300 investment.
    From your post, it sounds as though the Flex 4.5 sdk will be required for one to access the mobile phone features (gps, camera, accelerometer, etc.) which makes sense.  The ability to go actionscript->mobile was only recently announced.  Personally I think this capability is brilliant on Adobe's part.
    I'm still wondering about the "best practices" aspect. Obviously the idea of a mouseover does not apply in the context of a touchscreen.  As I recall, the events exposed by Cocoa Touch (or other touch screen APIs/libraries) don't have the same Mouse/Pointer events as the AS3 that I know.  The point of this post (which is working well so far thanks for the input) is to try and make sure that I avoid building an app which uses features unavailable in a mobile context.  I'm starting to wonder if skipping the web page advice is being given because they mobile and web page paradigms are so different.
    I still assert that the web page stage would be much easier to bring in testers -- meaning non-technical people who wouldn't know the first thing about installing an app on their phone. I'm talking about an audience of dozens or possibly hundreds and just can't provide them all guidance about getting the app installed.

  • Best Practice in regards to adding showing SkinnablePopUp from the Main application file of Mobile A

    Hello,
    I want to display a SkinnablePopUp when the user presses the back key when the current view is the first view to ask if he wants to quit.
    The logic (checking if the key pressed was the back key && the current view is the first view) is in the main application file and if those two conditions are true then the exit() method is called.
    I want to show the confirmation popup. Should I move all that in the first view mxml component or is it OK to instantiate the SkinnablePopUp in the main app file?
    Thank you.

    so do I, or did, well still do but less than before
    it seems best practice is to seperate mxml and AS3
    have a look at this
    http://tv.adobe.com/watch/max-2010-develop/flexactionscript-30-architecture-and-dependency -injection-frameworks-overview/

  • Best practices of having a different external/internal domain

    In the midst of migrating from a joint Windows/Mac server environment to a completely Apple one. Previously, DNS was hosted on the Windows machine using the companyname.local internal domain. When we set up the Apple server, our Apple contact created a new internal domain, called companyname.ltd. (Supposedly there was some conflict in having a 10.5 server be part of a .local domain - either way it was no worries either way.) Companyname.net is our website.
    The goal now is to have the Leopard server run everything - DNS, Kerio mailserver, website, the works. In setting up the DNS on the Mac server this go around, we were advised to just use companyname.net as the internal domain name instead of .ltd or .local or something like that. I happen to like having a separate local domain just for clarity's sake - users know if they are internal/external, but supposedly the Kerio setup would respond much better to just the one companyname.net.
    So after all that - what's the best practice of what I should do? Is it ok to have companyname.net be the local domain, even when companyname.net is also the address to our external website? Or should the local domain be something different from that public URL? Or does it really not matter one way or the other? I've been running companyname.net as the local domain for a week or so now with pretty much no issues, I'd just hate to hit a point where something breaks long term because of an initial setup mixup.
    Thanks in advance for any advice you all can offer!

    Part of this is personal preference, but there are some technical elements to it, too.
    You may find that your decision is swayed by the number of mobile users in your network. If your internal machines are all stationary then it doesn't matter if they're configured for companyname.local (or any other internal-only domain), but if you're a mobile user (e.g. on a laptop that you take to/from work/home/clients/starbucks, etc.) then you'll find it a huge PITA to have to reconfigure things like your mail client to get mail from mail.companyname.local when you're in the office but mail.companyname.net when you're outside.
    For this reason we opted to use the same domain name internally as well as externally. Everyone can set their mail client (and other apps) to use one hostname and DNS controls where they go - e.g. if they're in the office or on VPN, the office DNS server hands out the internal address of the mail server, but if they're remote they get the public address.
    For the most part, users don't know the difference - most of them wouldn't know how to tell anyway - and using one domain name puts the onus on the network administrator to make sure it's correct which IMHO certainly raises the chance of it working correctly when compared to hoping/expecting/praying that all company employees understand your network and know which server name to use when.
    Now one of the downsides of this is that you need to maintain two copies of your companyname.net domain zone data - one for the internal view and one for external (but that's not much more effort than maintaining companyname.net and companyname.local) and make sure you edit the right one.
    It also means you cannot use Apple's Server Admin to manage your DNS on a single machine - Server Admin only understands one view (either internal or external, but not both at the same time). If you have two DNS servers (one for public use and one for internal-only use) then that's not so much of an issue.
    Of course, you can always drive DNS manually by editing the zone files directly.

  • 2nd Mac - best practices using iPhoto on both?

    Hi -
    I just got a new MacBook and have an iMac that is still the "hub" of my photo library. It is, in fact, about a 180 GB iPhoto library. I know that I can't sync libraries between Macs (a shame - someone should come up with a way to that assuming they haven't already!) so I'm just looking for any best practices?
    I got the MacBook to be able to work on some photos while on the road - I can at least work on post processing in Photoshop, etc. I'm thinking now that my best strategy is to possibly work with the images on my MacBook, importing them into the iPhoto library if desired. Then use my Photo sharing service - Phanfare - to "sync" them? It requires me to download them on the other side and pull them again into the iPhoto Library on the iMac?
    I don't use the Mobile Me Gallery but I suppose that would be another way to have access to them on the alternate computer?
    Any other best practices or suggestions?
    Thx!

    So, if there are times when I'm not home to access my external drive, then going with the two libraries is the best solution, yes?
    Perhaps, but you can get very small and portable external HDs these days.
    I'm not sure though if I should really make both a 180 GB iPhoto library, do you? It is a back up true, but seems like a chunk to move
    But you only do it once. The first time. Thereafter you're simply updating the other with the changes.
    At least maybe I could split into pictures from 2009 - 2010 and have that library for both my iMac and the MacBook. I very rarely access before then (only if I need something specific) so then I could access that via the iMac exclusively?
    That would be viable.
    I would maintain a +full Library+ on the Desktop, the mobile versions a Smaller subset.
    I'm sort of ruling out the one library on the external solution because it eliminates the possibility of being remote -
    As I said above you can get tiny portable drives...
    unless there is some swanky Login to My Computer or something that works with a Mac that can go remotely to my computer and then to my external drive.
    *_This_* might help.
    Regards
    TD

  • TechNet Wiki - Best Practice Blog Posts

    Lately, we've had some great blog posts about best practices on TechNet Wiki. So we're going to share them with you here...
    Wiki
    Life: Commenting on Comments... Care to Comment?- 10/16/14 by Ed Price
    How
    to write a great post on the Wiki - For Dummies - 10/12/14 by Gokan Ozcifci
    Wednesday
    - Wiki Life: The Importance of Longer, High-Quality Articles - 10/8/14 by Ed Price
    Wednesday
    - Wiki Life: 10 ways to become the most hated Wiki ninja on the planet - 10/1/14 by Peter Geelen
    Wiki Life:
    PowerShell PowerPack! - 9/17/14 by Matthew Yarlett
    The
    most unseen and unspoken TechNet Wiki roles: The mentor Role - 6/22/14 by Sandro Periera
    Wiki Life: Smart Tags -
    6/18/14 by Matthew Yarlett
    Wiki Life:
    Ownership and Credibility - 6/11/14 by Matthew Yarlett
    Wiki
    Life: Best Practices for building TechNet Wiki Portals - 6/4/14 by Horizon Net
    Wiki
    life: Technet Wiki tagging, the ugly truth. - 5/29/14 by Peter Geelen
    Wiki Life:
    Getting too Personal!  - 5/14/14 by Matthew Yarlett
    Wiki Life:
    YOU edited MY article??!  - 4/30/14 by Matthew Yarlett
    Wiki
    Life: Are you right in making it a rite to write? - 4/16/14 by Matthew Yarlett
    Wiki Life - Alerts -
    4/9/14 by Alan Carlos
    Wiki
    Life: Speling an gamma, it is umpotant? - 4/2/14 - by Matthew Yarlett
    Wiki
    Life: How to Translate TechNet Wiki Articles - 4/2/14 by Horizon Net 
    Wiki Life:
    Attention to Detail - 3/19/14 by Matthew Yarlett
    Wednesday - Wiki Life - Mobility - 3/12/14 by Alan Carlos
    Wiki
    Life: A Picture is Worth a 1000 Words - 3/5/14 by Matthew Yarlett
    Wiki Life: Cut'N'Paste -
    2/19/14 by Matthew Yarlett
    Wiki Life: How to Join Leadership - 2/19/14 by Horizon Net
    Wiki Life: Featured Articles in the TechNet Wiki - 2/12/14 by Durval Ramos
    Wiki Life: Code.Format() -
    2/5/14 by Matthew Yarlett
    Wiki Life: The CodePlex Corner - 2/5/14 by Horizon Net
    Did you know that we have a layout article? - 1/29/14 by Durval Ramos
    Wiki
    Life: Get to the point, keep it short! - 1/22/14 by Matthew Yarlett
    Wiki Life:
    Planning a Great Article - 1/8/14 by Matthew Yarlett
    Wiki Life: Best Practices for converting an MSDN / TechNet Forum thread into a Wiki Article!!!
    - 12/25/13 by Ed Price
    Wiki Life: Best Practices for Giving Credit - 12/18/13 by Horizon Net
    Wiki Life: How To Fix a Wiki Article TOC  - 12/4/13 by Benoit Jester
    Wiki Life: How To Detect Missing Tags Without any Effort  - 11/20/13 by Benoit Jester
    Wiki Life: How To Import an Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet Into a Wiki Article - 10/30/13 by
    Markus Vilcinskas
    Wiki Life: Cross Linking  - 10/9/13 by Horizon Net
    Wiki Life: User Groups Portal - 10/2/13 by Horizon Net
    Ed Price, Azure & Power BI Customer Program Manager (Blog,
    Small Basic,
    Wiki Ninjas,
    Wiki)
    Answer an interesting question?
    Create a wiki article about it!

    Respected sensei Wiki Ninja,
    what else do you need to start a Wiki article?
    Put you signature in practice!
    So I kindly invite you all to continue your braindump over here:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/27905.technet-wiki-best-practices-blog-posts-articles.aspx
    Peter Geelen (Microsoft Belgium) - Premier Field Engineer Security & Identity
    [If a post helps to resolve your issue, please click the
    "Mark as Answer" of that post or click "Vote as helpful" button
    of that post.
    By marking a post as Answered or Helpful, you help others find the answer faster.

  • Best practiceS for setting up Macs on Network

    Greetings.
    We have six Macs on our Windows Server network; three iMacs and three laptops. We have set up all the machines and they are joined to the Active Directory. In the past, we have always created local users on the machines and then "browsed" to the server shares and mounted the them. We've learned things have improved/changed over the years and we're just now realizing we can probably have the machines set up to work better. So, I have a couple of questions for "best practices" when setting up each of the machines.
    1. Since we’re in a network environment, should we not set up “local logins/users” and instead have users login using their AD login? It seems having a local account creates some conflicts with the server since upgrading to lion.
    2. Should we set the computer to not ask for a “list of users” and instead ask for a username and password for logins?
    3. For the user that uses the machine most often, they can still customize their desktop when they use an AD login, correct?
    4. Should we set up Mobile User Accounts? What exactly does this do?
    Any other advice on how we should best be setting up the clients for our environment to make sure we are following best practices would be great!
    Thanks for any help!
    Jay

    Greetings.
    We have six Macs on our Windows Server network; three iMacs and three laptops. We have set up all the machines and they are joined to the Active Directory. In the past, we have always created local users on the machines and then "browsed" to the server shares and mounted the them. We've learned things have improved/changed over the years and we're just now realizing we can probably have the machines set up to work better. So, I have a couple of questions for "best practices" when setting up each of the machines.
    1. Since we’re in a network environment, should we not set up “local logins/users” and instead have users login using their AD login? It seems having a local account creates some conflicts with the server since upgrading to lion.
    2. Should we set the computer to not ask for a “list of users” and instead ask for a username and password for logins?
    3. For the user that uses the machine most often, they can still customize their desktop when they use an AD login, correct?
    4. Should we set up Mobile User Accounts? What exactly does this do?
    Any other advice on how we should best be setting up the clients for our environment to make sure we are following best practices would be great!
    Thanks for any help!
    Jay

  • ASA 5505 Best Practice Guidance Requested

    I am hoping to tap into the vast wealth of knowledge on this board in order to gain some "best practice" guidance to assist me with the overall setup using the ASA 5505 for a small business client.  I'm fairly new to the ASA 5505 so any help would be most appreciated!
    My current client configuration is as follows:
    a) business internet service (cable) with a fixed IP address
    b) a Netgear N600 Wireless Dual Band router (currently setup as gateway and used for internet/WiFi access)
    c) a Cisco SG-500-28 switch
    d) one server running Windows Small Business Server 2011 Standard (primary Domain Controller)
         (This server is currently the DNS and DHCP server)
    e) one server running Windows Server 2008 R2 (secondary Domain Controller)
    f) approximately eight Windows 7 clients (connected via SG-500-28 switch)
    g) approximately six printers connected via internal network (connected via SG-500-28 switch)
    All the servers, clients, and printers are connected to the SG-500-28 switch.
    The ISP provides the cable modem for the internet service.
    The physical cable for internet is connected to the cable modem.
    From the cable modem, a CAT 6 ethernet cable is connected to the internet (WAN) port of the Netgear N600 router.
    A Cat 6 ethernet cable is connected from Port 1 of the local ethernet (LAN) port on the N600 router to the SG-500-28 switch.
    cable modem -> WAN router port
    LAN router port -> SG-500-28
    The ASA 5505 will be setup with an "LAN" (inside) interface and a "WAN" (outside) interface.  Port e0/0 on the ASA 5505 will be used for the outside interface and the remaining ports will be used for the inside interface.
    So my basic question is, given the information above of our setup, where should the ASA 5505 be "inserted" to maximize its performance?  Also, based on the answer to the previous question, can you provide some insight as to how the ethernet cables should be connected to achieve this?
    Another concern I have is what device will be used as the default gateway.  Currently, the Netgear N600 is set as the default gateway on both Windows servers.  In your recommended best practice solution, does the ASA 5505 become the default gateway or does the router remain the default gateway?
    And my final area of concern is with DHCP.  As I stated earlier, I am running DHCP on Windows Small Business Server 2011 Standard.  Most of the examples I have studied for the ASA 5505 utilize its DHCP functionality.  I also have done some research on the "dhcprelay server" command.  So I'm not quite sure which is the best way to go. First off, does the "dhcprelay server" even work with SBS 2011?  And secondly, if it does work, is the best practice to use the "dhcprelay" command or to let the ASA 5505 perform the DHCP server role?
    All input/guidance/suggestions with these issues would be greatly appreciated!  I want to implement the ASA 5505 firewall solution following "best practices" recommendations in order to maximize its functionality and minimize the time to implement.
    FYI, the information (from the "show version" command) for the ASA 5505 is shown below:
    Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.4(7)
    Device Manager Version 7.1(5)100
    Compiled on Fri 30-Aug-13 19:48 by builders
    System image file is "disk0:/asa847-k8.bin"
    Config file at boot was "startup-config"
    ciscoasa up 2 days 9 hours
    Hardware:   ASA5505, 512 MB RAM, CPU Geode 500 MHz
    Internal ATA Compact Flash, 128MB
    BIOS Flash M50FW016 @ 0xfff00000, 2048KB
    Encryption hardware device : Cisco ASA-5505 on-board accelerator (revision 0x0)
                                 Boot microcode   : CN1000-MC-BOOT-2.00
                                 SSL/IKE microcode: CNLite-MC-SSLm-PLUS-2.03
                                 IPSec microcode  : CNlite-MC-IPSECm-MAIN-2.06
                                 Number of accelerators: 1
    0: Int: Internal-Data0/0    : address is a493.4c99.8c0b, irq 11
    1: Ext: Ethernet0/0         : address is a493.4c99.8c03, irq 255
    2: Ext: Ethernet0/1         : address is a493.4c99.8c04, irq 255
    3: Ext: Ethernet0/2         : address is a493.4c99.8c05, irq 255
    4: Ext: Ethernet0/3         : address is a493.4c99.8c06, irq 255
    5: Ext: Ethernet0/4         : address is a493.4c99.8c07, irq 255
    6: Ext: Ethernet0/5         : address is a493.4c99.8c08, irq 255
    7: Ext: Ethernet0/6         : address is a493.4c99.8c09, irq 255
    8: Ext: Ethernet0/7         : address is a493.4c99.8c0a, irq 255
    9: Int: Internal-Data0/1    : address is 0000.0003.0002, irq 255
    10: Int: Not used            : irq 255
    11: Int: Not used            : irq 255
    Licensed features for this platform:
    Maximum Physical Interfaces       : 8              perpetual
    VLANs                             : 3              DMZ Restricted
    Dual ISPs                         : Disabled       perpetual
    VLAN Trunk Ports                  : 0              perpetual
    Inside Hosts                      : 10             perpetual
    Failover                          : Disabled       perpetual
    VPN-DES                           : Enabled        perpetual
    VPN-3DES-AES                      : Enabled        perpetual
    AnyConnect Premium Peers          : 2              perpetual
    AnyConnect Essentials             : Disabled       perpetual
    Other VPN Peers                   : 10             perpetual
    Total VPN Peers                   : 12             perpetual
    Shared License                    : Disabled       perpetual
    AnyConnect for Mobile             : Disabled       perpetual
    AnyConnect for Cisco VPN Phone    : Disabled       perpetual
    Advanced Endpoint Assessment      : Disabled       perpetual
    UC Phone Proxy Sessions           : 2              perpetual
    Total UC Proxy Sessions           : 2              perpetual
    Botnet Traffic Filter             : Disabled       perpetual
    Intercompany Media Engine         : Disabled       perpetual
    This platform has a Base license.

    Hey Jon,
    Again, many thanks for the info!
    I guess I left that minor detail out concerning the Guest network.  I have a second Netgear router that I am using for Guest netowrk access.  It is plugged in to one of the LAN network ports on the first Netgear router.
    The second Netgear (Guest) router is setup on a different subnet and I am letting the router hand out IP addresses using DHCP.
    Basic setup is the 192.168.1.x is the internal network and 192.168.11.x is the Guest network.  As far as the SBS 2011 server, it knows nothing about the Guest network in terms of the DHCP addresses it hands out.
    Your assumption about the Guest network is correct, I only want to allow guest access to the internet and no access to anything internal.  I like your idea of using the restricted DMZ feature of the ASA for the Guest network.  (I don't know how to do it, but I like it!)  Perhaps you could share more of your knowledge on this?
    One final thing, the (internal) Netgear router setup does provide the option for a separate Guest network, however it all hinges on the router being the DHCP server.  This is what led me to the second (Guest) Netgear router because I wanted the (internal) Netgear router NOT to use DHCP.  Instead I wanted SBS 2011 to be the DHCP server.  That's what led to the idea of a second (Guest) router with DHCP enabled.
    The other factor in all this is SBS 2011.  Not sure what experience you've had with the Small Business Server OS's but they tend to get a little wonky if some of the server roles are disabled.  For instance, this is a small busines with a total of about 20 devices including servers, workstations and printers.  Early on I thought, "nah, I don't need this IPv6 stuff," so I found an article on how to disable it and did so.  The server performance almost immediately took a nose dive.  Rebooting the server went from a 5 minute process to a 20 minute process.  And this was after I followed the steps of an MSDN article on disabling IPv6 on SBS 2011!  Well, long story short, I enabled IPv6 again and the two preceeding issues cleared right up.  So, since SBS 2011 by "default" wants DHCP setup I want to try my best to accomodate it.  So, again, your opinion/experiece related to this is a tremendous help!
    Thanks!

  • Best practice file management

    Hello everyone
    I'm hoping to receive some advice on the best way to store a large collection of music, pictures and video, whilst keeping my computer as empty as possible to maximise it's processing power for professional video editing in the future. The computer is for both personal and business use, and I share it with my partner who is a music fiend, but not computer savvy.
    I have recently purchased a new 27" iMac with the standard specs (3.1GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i5, 4GB memory, 1TB hard drive).  It is currently running Snow Leopard (v. 10.6.6), and I plan to update to Lion when I purchase a new broadband account.
    I also have:
    One external 1TB Western Digital drive, currently at 85% capacity, with music, videos and pictures
    One external 1TB Western Digital drive, currently empty
    A new 2TB time capsule which is not yet set up
    Apple TV, not yet set up
    A mobile USB modem and basic account, soon to be replaced by a fairly high speed broadband modem with a fairly large download cap
    So far, I have:
    created three user profiles - one administrator, and two users
    Set up iTunes so each user shares a single library and itunes media folder
    We would like to also digitise a large collection of CDs and records.
    I was thinking about using the time capsule not only for storage/back up, but also to create a wireless network, allowing it to be stored with my printer and the hard drives can be stored in different room to the computer, away from sight.  The computer is so very gorgeous on it's own after all.... I've been advised also to use it as a wireless router when we purchase our broadband account, so I'm assuming the modem should also be connected to the time capsule in the other room.
    Rather than droning on about what I think I should do, I wondered if one of you experts could advise me on the best way to set everything up? I'm not sure that it's the best idea to set it up so the computer is always having to find files wirelessly from the time capsule and connected drives...  Wouldn't that be slow?
    The advice I've read in the various forums has been rather confusing, so your advice would be really appreciated!!
    Cheers
    Fiona

    Hi Fiona,
    Like your question, I'm in same boat and new to iMAC all together and want to setup backup and sharing strategy via best practice right up front.  Did you get any response or any good best practice you ran across in your research you an share with me?  Thanks.

  • Best Practice for FlexConnect Wireless roaming in MediaNet environment?

    Hello!
    Current Cisco best practice recommendations for enterprise MediaNet design, specify that VLANs be local to a switch / switch stack (i.e., to limit the scope of spanning-tree). 
    In the wireless world, this causes problems if you want users while roaming to keep real-time applications up and running.  Every time they connect to a new AP on a different VLAN, then they will need to get a new IP address, which interrupts real-time apps. 
    So...best practice for LAN users causes real problems for wireless users.
    I thought I'd post here in case there's a best practice for implementing wireless roaming in a routed environment that we might have missed so far!
    We have a failover pair of FlexConnect 7510s, btw, configured for local switching for Internal users, and central switching with an anchor controller on the DMZ for Guest users.
    Thanks,
    Deb

    Thanks for your replies, Stephen and JSnyder.
    The situation here is that the original design engineer is no longer here, and the original design was not MediaNet-friendly, in that it had a very few /20 subnets bridged over entire large sites. 
    These several large sites (with a few hundred wireless users per site), are connected to an HQ location (where the 7510s in failover mode are installed) via 1G ethernet hand-offs (MPLS at the WAN provider).  The 7510s are new, and are replacing older contollers at the HQ location. 
    The internal employee wireless users use resources both local to their site, as well as centralized resources.  There are at least as many Guest wireless users per site as there are internal employee users, and the service to them consists of Internet traffic only.  (When moved to the 7510s, their traffic will continue to be centrally switched and carried to an anchor controller in the DMZ.) 
    (1) So, going local mode seems impractical due to the sheer number of users whose traffic bound for their local site would be traversing the WAN twice.  Too much bandwidth would be used.  So, that implies the need to use Flex / HREAP mode instead.
    (2) However, re-designing each site's IP environment for MediaNet would suggest to go routed to the closet.  However, this breaks seamless roaming for users....
    So, this conundrum is why I thought I'd post here, and see if there was some other cool / nifty solution I wasn't yet aware of. 
    The only other (possibly friendly to both needs) solution I'd thought of was to GRE tunnel a subnet from each closet to the collapsed Core / Disti switch at each site.  Unfortunately, GRE tunnels are not supported in the rev of IOS on the present equipment, and so it isn't possible to try this idea.
    Another "blue sky" idea I had (not for this customer, but possibly elsewhere in the future), is to use LAN switches such as 3850s that have WLC functionality built-in.  I haven't yet worked with the WLC s/w available on those, but I was thinking it looks like they could be put into a mobility group, and L3 user roaming between them might then work.  Do you happen to know if this might be a workable solution to the overall big-picture problem? 
    Thanks again for taking the time and trouble to reply!
    Deb

Maybe you are looking for