Modify a Existing Search Query

Is there a way to modify a query executed in a Look up screen to include Extended fields.
For Example if I add some extension fields to a material can I modify the Lookup (Search) query on a Sales order to use these new fields when searching for a Product... (Or best situation can i search for relivant data in a Associated BO my Add-on has created)
I am guessing NO but just wanted to verify.

If you define a process integration for the extension field of the material and transfer it from the material to the sales order, you will be able to also use it in the query of the sales order.
This will only work for newly created sales orders of course, but not for sales orders that existed before you extended the material.
For your own created objects, this might work if you create the extension fields of the material via the SDK, but I am not sure about this. I have never seen extension fields to be available in an associated BO.

Similar Messages

Modifying an existing ABAP Query - sq01 (tcode)

Hi All,
We have a query develped (Z) long before .Now we have a requirment where in which we need to add one more table to the existing query.Kindly let me know how can we proceed.
When am giving the query name and clicked on change , am not able to find any option which allows the user to add one more table.
looking for valuble inputs on the same.
Regards,
Zareena.

Hi ,
u need to follow these steps when u are working on queries.
Step1-->SQ03->Give ur user group here ->then /nSQ02->here it will display all ur Infosets those belongs to ur user Group--->then go in Change Mode, after u know wat u have to do.
Regards
Prabhu

Modifying the existing search base to a new one

My CoreId is having search base set to "dc=abc, dc=com". For some better architecture reasoning, now I wanted to change the search base to a new Ldap node called "Users,dc=abc,dc=com". I will move all our users and groups from earlier node "dc=abc, dc=com" to the new one "Users,dc=abc,dc=com". So all my users and groups will have different entryDN after the move, but they will carry the same user-id/ group-id.
Here are few questions related to this.
(1) All workflows refer to many users and groups. By changing the search-base will it refer to the new location automatically –OR- I have to manually change all the work flow by reselecting the users and groups.
(2) Do I have to redefine all our static groups again since all users have different entryDN now?
(3) Do I have to do any modifications to all the existing authentication schemes etc.
(4) Any other modification/ tasks ??
Thanks!
Kp

Hello Saggu, Before running this conversion tool I have few specific questions.
What is the meaning of these options for obmigratedn.exe
-c <configDN> : I am assuming this is Oblix configuration dn value (o=Oblix,dc=abc,dc=com) provided during CoreId set up
-o <oblixnode> : ???
-i <installdir> : Is this the CoreId installation Directory ??
-n <native_dn> : ???
-l <logical_dn> :???
Just a note :- I wanted to change only the use DNs (example "cn=kabi,dc=abc,dc=com" to "cn=kabi,o=employee,dc=abc,dc=com"). Oblix configuration remain at old node. Not sure if I should run this tool.

How to modify search query based on new FE

Hi,
As per a requirement, in All Accounts search (advanced search section), I had to replace 5 checkboxes (e.g. Role1, Role2, Role3, Role4, Role5) by a single dropdown (codelist) name= "Account_Roles" containing same values (Role1, Role2, Role3, Role4, Role5). I created Customer's XBO and declared field of the codelist type, name= "Account_Roles". So, the XBO now has below 6 fields :
Role1, Role2, Role3, Role4, Role5 (type = Indicator)
Account_Roles (type = codelist)
Existing search on All Accounts worked on the 5 checboxes and fetched those accounts for which the values matched.
E.g.
If in search parameters, I check Role1 & Role2, and for Account1, these values are stored as "true", then Account1 will be shown in the result list.
Now the search UI doesn't have the checkboxes, but codelist ('Account_Roles') which can have value 'Role1'/'Role2'/'Role3'/'Role4'/'Role5' or combinations are also possible like 'Role1' OR 'Role2', etc..
My question here is -
Will the old search query that worked on indicator fields earlier, handle the new FE "Account_Roles" automatically ?
If not, then will modification be required to existing search query ?
If modification is required, what steps I need to follow to handle this new field instead of checkboxes.
I need exact steps to modify a search query, as I tried several things in the PDI but was not able to confirm if this requirement can be implemented by modifying search query or it is not feasible from PDI perspective.
Appreciate all your inputs.
Thanks,
Sachin.

Hi,
you can create a link between the vendor objects itself, means link 0vendor with 0ven_compc and 0ven_purorg. This should give you a list of all vendors multiplied with the comp codes multiplied with the purch. org. May be here it is possible to create another link between a attribute (eg. comp_code of 0ven_purorg with comp_code of 0ven_compc). In case it is not possible you need to add this link information somehow. Another option might be to create 2 queries. One on a infoset of 0vendor and 0ven_purorg and another one on 0vendor and 0ven_compc.
regards
Siggi

Modify existing SAP Query / Quickview

Hello,
Greetings!
We have a requirement to modify an existing SAP Query. This query was created much earlier by a user who is no longer present.
We have the query name, user group, and the program for the query. This query, we assume was created using tcode SQVI.
However, in tcode SQVI, we cannot see the query as we have not created it.
I understand that this is because the quick view has not been converted to query.
I have referred:
SQVI - Quick view modification
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/QuickViewer
In tcode SQ01, we are unable to see the query, as we get an error that the user group does not exist.
In table AQLTQ, we get an entry for the query and the user group. But the user group does not exist in tcode SQ03 as well.
In this case, how to we convert the quickview to query? Or is there any other way to edit the exisitng quickview/query?
Kindly help.
Best Regards,
Smruthi

Hello Suhas,
Thank you for your reply.
I checked in both the tables.
There exists an entry only in AQLQCAT(Local or Client-dependent queries). We now have the infoset as well, along with the user group and the query.
When I check for the infoset in SQ02, I get an error, "Infoset <infoset name> not created"
The user group is the same as that found in table AQLTQ.
Best Regards,
Smruthi

Search/Query Form bc4j-uix-jsp

Hi:
Are there any samples of Search/Query jsps using
bc4j -uix jsps?
There are some on OTN using html.
I want to set up a search page that users can select one or more(AND) from about 5 attributes
of a view and then display approx 6-8 different attributes of that same view.
Any input would be appreciated.
Thanks.

Once you create the Query-by-Form datawebbean, you can modify the templates in the templates\webapp directory by changing all usages of the FindForm bean to use your new DWB. You can also create a new webapp template by copying the existing file and creating a new directory. You can add you new template by modifying the templates\apptemplates.xml. The current entries are:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<APPTEMPLATES>
<TEMPLATE NAME="default" DIRECTORY="templates/webapp/" USETHEMESELECTION="YES">
</TEMPLATE>
<TEMPLATE NAME="Oracle" USEFORMSELECTION="NO" DIRECTORY="templates/cabowebapp/" THEMEDIR="/webapp/jsimages" THEMECSS="/webapp/cabo/images/cabo_styles.css" USETHEMESELECTION="NO" TOOLBARCLASS="oracle.jbo.html.databeans.JSNavigatorBar">
</TEMPLATE>
</APPTEMPLATES>

String Search Query in any columns in any table in a database

Hi All,
I am trying to search a word which starts with 'FRA' in any columns and any tables.
I am unable tofind what is generating a join datasets in the webservice from teh database as it is not apparent within teh 100 tables.
I ahve looked into
Re: How to search in all rows and all columns?
Re: SQL Search Query - HELP!
but none of these queries is working out for me as I am a user with no tables on its own but rather a user quering other tables.I think its a tweak on which dat adisctionary I can view
select distinct substr (table_name, 1, 14) "Table",
substr (t.column_value.getstringval (), 1, 50) "Column/Value"
from all_cons_columns,
table
(xmlsequence
(dbms_xmlgen.getxmltype ('select ' || column_name
|| ' from ' || table_name
|| ' where upper('
|| column_name
|| ') like upper(''%' || 'fra'
|| '%'')'
).extract ('ROWSET/ROW/*')
) t
order by "Table";
running teh above query got me thsi error:
ORA-19202: Error occurred in XML processing
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_XMLGEN", line 288
ORA-06512: at line 1
19202. 00000 - "Error occurred in XML processing%s"
*Cause:    An error occurred when processing the XML function
*Action:   Check the given error message and fix the appropriate problem
Any help is much appreciated
Edited by: CrackerJack on Sep 3, 2012 5:55 PM
Edited by: CrackerJack on Sep 3, 2012 5:55 PM

Hi,
CrackerJack wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to search a word which starts with 'FRA' in any columns and any tables.
I am unable tofind what is generating a join datasets in the webservice from teh database as it is not apparent within teh 100 tables.
I ahve looked into
Re: How to search in all rows and all columns?
Re: SQL Search Query - HELP!
but none of these queries is working out for me as I am a user with no tables on its own but rather a user quering other tables.I think its a tweak on which dat adisctionary I can view In all_<b>cons</b>_columns, "cons" stands for "constraints". That view only includes columns that have a constraint on them.
Use all_<b>tab</b>_columns if you're interested in all columns in all tables.
select distinct substr (table_name, 1, 14) "Table",
substr (t.column_value.getstringval (), 1, 50) "Column/Value"
from all_cons_columns,
table
(xmlsequence
(dbms_xmlgen.getxmltype ('select ' || column_name
|| ' from ' || table_name
|| ' where upper('
|| column_name
|| ') like upper(''%' || 'fra'
|| '%'')'
).extract ('ROWSET/ROW/*')
) t
order by "Table";You may have noticed that this site noramlly compresses whitespace.
Whenever you post formatted text (such as query results) on this site, type these 6 characters:
\(small letters only, inside curly brackets) before and after each section of formatted text, to preserve spacing.
When referencing a table in a differenct schema, you must qualify the table name with the owner (unless there happens to be a synonym). For example, if you are connected as some user other than scott, and you want to use the emp table that is in the scott schema; then you can't just say "SELECT ... FROM emp;", because that would look for the emp table in yur own schema. You have to say "SELECT ... FROM <b>scott.</b>emp;" instead. If the table is in your own schema, then the scema name is optional. The OWNER column in all_tab_columns gives the schema name.
running teh above query got me thsi error:
ORA-19202: Error occurred in XML processing
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_XMLGEN", line 288
ORA-06512: at line 1
19202. 00000 - "Error occurred in XML processing%s"
*Cause:    An error occurred when processing the XML function
*Action:   Check the given error message and fix the appropriate problemSorry, I don't know what causes that error.
If I use the data dictionary view cols (as in {message:id=3325696} which you cited), it runs correctly.
If use what I though was the equivalent data dictionary view, user_tab_columns, or if I use all_tab_columns or other data dictionary views, then I get those errors. I'm using Oracle 10.2.0.1.0.
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Sep 3, 2012 10:45 PM
John Spencer noticed the same problem 5 years ago. See {message:id=1969268}

SSAS Source - Column selection lost when modifying an existing "Add Item" step

When developing a Power Query query on an SSAS source, I often need to edit an existing "add items" step in order to add a few columns that I had initially missed out. To do this, I point to the step previously created and click on the small gear
icon to edit it.
However, when doing so, the edit dialogue is not initialised with all the columns that I had previously selected. Which means that if I am not careful and do not scrupulously recheck every column that I need, the modification will destroy what I had created
before.
Inserting another step rather than modifying an existing one might be a workaround, but I would rather keep the number of steps to the minimum. Also, if there is an edit button, one should be able to rely on it.
Has anyone experienced the same issue?
PQ Version: 2.18.3874.242 - Excel 2013 32bits.

This is a known issue that will be resolved in an upcoming release.
A work-around for now when using the UI builder to edit a selection is to expand dimensions that had an attribute added from it before dismissing the dialog.

C ldap_search_ext_s search query problem

I have an application developed in C++ that uses the Novell C LDAP SDK.
If I use a search query to the ldap_search_ext_s function of the form
Code:
(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(%s=%s))
it works when I substitute the first %s with 'cn' and the second with a
valid username.
If I modify the query to:
Code:
(&(|(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(objectClass=aliasO bject))(%s=%s))
it no longer works. I want to find user objects and user alias objects
that match a username. I am substituting 'cn' and a valid username as
before.
This query works with the ldapsearch command from the OpenLDAP tools on
a Linux installation. According to page 39 of ldaplibc.pdf it should
work with this SDK as well. The example there is:
Code:
(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson) (| (sn=Smith) (cn=Chris S*) ) )
To me that's the same format as my own search filter, albeit ordered
differently. I have tried using this query string and replacing the
parts to make it identical functionally to my query.
Each time I call ldap_search_ext_s it returns 4. The documentation says
a return code of 4 is 'LDAP_SIZELIMIT_EXCEEDED: Indicates that in a
search operation, the size limit specified by the client or the server
has been exceeded. Incomplete results are returned.'
This implies too many results are being returned, but I have checked
and the final query used in the function is:
Code:
(&(cn=user1) (| (objectClass=inetOrgPerson) (objectClass=aliasObject) ) )
Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
mattross
mattross's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=30003
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=394151

Oops I'm sorry to say I've already worked out what I was doing wrong! I
had a limit of 1 search result being returned by the function.
Previously when I was just looking for users by
objectClass=inetOrgPerson that was sufficient, but with aliases included
as well it was not.
Please disregard this thread.
mattross
mattross's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=30003
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=394151

Save Search Query

Hi ALL,
How to save the search query (with refiners) in SharePoint 2013 OOB.
Thanks,
Santhosh

Hi,
What did you mean the “save the search query (with refiners)”?
Did you mean the auto complete function?
In SharePoint 2013, there is no OOB way to use the auto complete function.
However, we can use the JQuery and REST Api to achieve it.
There are two good articles for your reference:
http://techmikael.blogspot.com/2013/06/extending-existing-search-box-in.html
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/murads/archive/2013/02/20/using-jquery-ui-autocomplete-with-the-rest-api-to-get-search-results-in-the-search-box.aspx
Thanks & Regards,
Jason
Jason Guo
TechNet Community Support

How do I use "Search Query" for nontrivial searches?

After a few years in the community, this is my _first_ question to the boards ;-)
In speaking with a colleague today, I learned about an NI forum feature that would be useful for me. When I tried to configure it, I then learned that I didn't know how to use it. When I tried to learn how to use it, I further learned that it wasn't fully documented. So, I'd like some clarification :-)
The feature in question is "Search Query" which will send you an email when a forum search matches your query. What I don't know is:
What are the rules (syntax) for search queries? For example, I would like to search for single words, all the words that I specify, as well as exact phrases. How do I differentiate between multiword queries and exact phrase queries?
Is it possible to have more than one Search Query?
If so, how do you delineate them? Would I use commas, a new line, something else?
I'm asking because the available (and discoverable) documentation doesn't mention what to do when you want more than one Search Query. The help text on the subscription page [1] makes me think that only one query is possible, and says a Search Query:
Sends you mail every time a message matching your query is submitted. Search queries take up to 15 minutes to take effect. Saving a blank query will disable this feature and will stop any mail from being sent.
The other place I tried was the NI Forum FAQ [2], which makes me think that more than one query is possible:
If you add a board, thread, message, or search term to your subscriptions, the system will send you an e-mail every time someone posts to the board, or replies to the message or thread. If you prefer not to receive an e-mail for your subscriptions, you can subscribe to the RSS feed of a board, thread, user, or search term.
The FAQ goes on about what to do with board, thread, and message subscriptions, but doesn't say anything more about search subscriptions.
The last place I looked was on the search results page itself. In the blue header that precedes the results, there's a link on the far left that says "Search Options" with a single option that says "Subscribe to this search's RSS Feed". While I could subscribe and use an RSS reader, I really would prefer email. I suppose if only one Search Query is possible, then this will be my workaround.
As a comment, why does the Search Options menu not also have a "Subscribe to this search" option, which would add another entry in the Search Query box? This is a noticeably different interface than the Thread Options menu.
[1] Subscriptions & Bookmarks
http://forums.ni.com/ni/user_subscriptions
[2] Frequently Asked Questions
http://forums.ni.com/ni/help_faq
Joe Friedchicken
NI VirtualBench Application Software
Get with your fellow hardware users :: [ NI's VirtualBench User Group ]
Get with your fellow OS users :: [ NI's Linux User Group ] [ NI's OS X User Group ]
Get with your fellow developers :: [ NI's DAQmx Base User Group ] [ NI's DDK User Group ]
Senior Software Engineer :: Multifunction Instruments Applications Group
Software Engineer :: Measurements RLP Group (until Mar 2014)
Applications Engineer :: High Speed Product Group (until Sep 2008)
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Joe,
Thanks for all of the questions and congrats on posting your first question!
Unfortunately I think all of your questions come from the valid assumption that the search query functionality is more robust than it actually is. The search query functionality really only serves a single purpose and that is to email you when your phrase has been posted to the forums. For me, I use it to email me when my name is mentioned in the forums. It serves this purpose well since I have it set up to work off just a single search term. However I find that multiple word phrases are combined with an OR which is not as useful. The search query does not adhere to any common search syntax that you would expect (I believe we are the only community that uses this feature so it has not been improved upon).
The best way to set up both multiple word queries and multiple different queries is to use the RSS feed as you mentioned. This way you can tailor your search very specifically using different advanced search options and subscribe to them all in one feed reader without constantly getting emails. The search query emails do not adhere to the digest subscription settings. I find that the RSS feeds work very well for searches and I am fond of using them, but I do use an RSS Reader for many things so it is not out of my normal workflow.
Thank you for reading the Forum FAQ. I've done some work to improve it but I think it has a long way to go and it's good to know that people read it
Regards,
Laura
Web Support & Operations
National Instruments

How to club 2 queries in one formatted search query

Hi All,
I have inserted a formatted search in the stock transfer for chnaging the 'From warehouse' based on series.
I have written following query for same,
SELECT $[$18.1.0]='08' WHERE $[OWTR.series] ='46'
It is working Fine
I want ot use same concept for selecting other based on other warehouse
e.g
SELECT $[$23.5.1]='02' WHERE $[OWTR.series] ='45'
But I am not able to club these queries on one formatted search query can anybody help to group it in one formatted search query....
Thanks and Regards,
Atul Joshi
Edited by: Atul Joshi on Dec 23, 2008 5:20 PM

Hi Atul,
You could define the quey like this
SELECT
CASE
WHEN $[OWTR.series]='46' THEN '08'
WHEN $[OWTR.series]='45' then '02'
end
from OWTR
Regards,
Vijay kumar
SAP Business One Forums Team

Need help in building search query

Guys ..
Problem Description:
I have a huge table that is indexed using CONTEXT.
I want to write a search query that considers the following:
1. number of keywords match
2. takes care of spelling mistakes, synonyms and acronyms
3. proximity - the keywords should not be too far of each other.
e.g. I have this phrase: "Horizontal Stabilizer Trim Brake"
I was thinking of writing a query like:
SELECT SCORE(1) SCORE,
TEXT text
FROM MY_TABLE
WHERE CONTAINS(TEXT, '(Horz | Horizontal) ACCUM (Stab | Stabilier) ACCUM Trim ACCUM (Brk | Break)', 1) >= 0
ORDER BY SCORE DESC
The results doesnt look satisfactory. I have not used "near" operator as i dont know how to use it.
Please help me as I am very much new to Oracle Text.
-G

Well, I'm not going to write the function for you, but we can at least talk through a general strategy.
A lot depends on how you help your users on the front end -- for example, if they're searching a technical document, you may want to return results that aren't perfect matches but you do want to make sure the user picks 'mandatory' and 'useful' keywords in a way that lets you figure out which ones are really important. On the other hand, if you're google and have to handle queries like 'horizontal stabilizer trim brake' and 'were Pete and Jenny in the break room' then you run the risk of spending too much time looking for interesting words, almost doing a full-text search on the query trying to derive meaning.
So I'm going to presume that you have some control over what/how the users generate their searches so that finding keywords isn't the issue.
The plan will be to parse the query a bit to find the interesting words, clean them up, and weigh their importance, then use transformed data to build the query template to score various combinations.
So here's some pseudocode for the function:
function parse_query(pQueryWords in clob) returns clob as
begin
    generate_token_list (); -- split the query into a set of individual tokens/words
    for each token in token_list
        if it's a mandatory word then accumtokenlist := accumtokenlist || ' ' || token ||'*10' -- weigh the presence of the token strongly
        if it's a useful word then accumtokenlist := accumtokenlist || ' ' || token ||'*5' -- domain-specific words are also important
        if it's a stopword or reserved word, then do not add it to the list
        if it's not on my lists, then accumtokenlist := accumtokenlist || ' ' || token
                                     and normaltokenlist := normaltokenlist ||' ' || token
    end;
    --so now, we have two lists, one for NEAR and one for ACCUM
    now build the guts of the template
        querytemplate := querytemplate || '<seq> || normaltokenlist || '</seq>';
        querytemplate := querytemplate || '<seq> || replace (accumtokenlist, ' ',' ACCUM ') || '</seq>';
        querytemplate := querytemplate || '<seq>$' || replace(normaltokenlist,' ','$') || '</seq>';
        querytemplate := querytemplate || '<seq>? || replace(replace(accumtokenlist,' ',' ?'),' ', ' accum ') || </seq>'; -- first fuzzy the words, then accum
        querytemplate := querytemplate || '<seq>? || replace(replace(normaltokenlist,' ',' ?'),' ', ' near ') || </seq>'; -- first fuzzy the words, then near
    return querytemplate
end;So, with a 'cooked' query text that is template-friendly, all we need to do is apply a template that is aware of your inputs:
query_Template_string := '
<query>
   <textquery lang="ENGLISH" grammar="CONTEXT"> horizontal stabilizer*5 trim brake*10
     <progression> '
|| parse_query('horizontal stabilizer trim brake') ||
'     </progression>
   </textquery>
<score datatype="INTEGER" algorithm="COUNT"/>'
</query>So that's an example of one approach.

How to run a search query for a particular folder in KM related to portal

Hi,
Can any one tell me the steps for : how to run a search query for a particular folder in knowledge management related to portal.
Answers will be rewarded.
Thanks in advance.
KN
Edited by: KN on Mar 18, 2008 6:33 AM

Ok u may not require a coding
But u req configuration
U should first make a search option set
Link: [Search Option set|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cc/f4e77ddef1244380b06fee5f8b892a/frameset.htm]
Then u need 2 duplicate a KM Command by the name Search From here
and customize it to include the Search Option that u have created
Link: [Search from here|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2a/4ff640365d8566e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm]
Then in the layout add this command.
Regards
BP

Ultra Search query

Question on what the syntax should be to perform a search query via Ultra Search revolving around 3 terms ("solaris","access control","buffer overflow").
The search result should return documents which contain the words ("solaris" and "access control") OR the words ("solaris" and "buffer overflow").
Currently can't even do ("solaris" and "access control"). When trying I get documents matching "solaris" | "access" | "control".
Any advice appreciated.

PS:
you'll get documents only contains "solaris" too, but those should have very low score compare to the others,
assuming you have documents containing the other terms.
if you want to do (solaris and "access control") do
solaris "access control"

Modify a Existing Search Query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for