Moving tables & indexes accross other TS

Hi All,
I have a 9i DB with a schema MOB, this schema contains almost 3000 objects. Initially i had a single TS with almost 30 dbf under it. The size of my database is more than 100GB. Now i want to distribute my data across different tablespaces.(e.g 10 TS).
I wanna move the objects in alphabetical order (say i combine the objects starting with A & B) and put them under one TS and so on.
What is the best way i can do to move my data across the new tablespaces? Is there any risk of moving the objects, indexes ?
Please share your experiences & ideas which can help me.
Thanks !!!!
Regards,
MB

I will start from top as well :)
Maintenance & AdministrationTo be more realistic, Am running my database on Unix server and my problems were more related to performance might be because i had them in a single tablespace including the partitioned tables.So i expected that segregating them across different tablespaces might overcome my problems.
Backup & RecoveryNo they all are supposed to be restored/recovered at one time.Yes my partitioned tables can be put into read only tablespace. No, am doing my backup using EMC Time Finder/BCV over legato.
PerformancePerformance issues were RED alerts for me. I expected that distributing them might help me in having better performance, since i had partitioned tables and few big tables which had continuous inserts & updates by the application backend processes which run from UNIX. No, i dont have any issues with extent allocation and space management policies but i have an estimation that database would even grow larger expecting to 400-500G.
Simplicity & ManagebilityOne tablespace was always alarming because if any corruption or disaster would occur, all of my database files would suffer, or if in case i need to make my tablespace OFFLINE than it would have effected other database files as well.
Currently the database size is 100GB but i expect after migration it would grow twice of its current size.
Can you suggest what are the consequences that require segregation or an alternate approach. Please correct me as am in my early stages and trying to manage my database up to perfection.
Hope am able to express myself :)
Thanks !!!
Regards,
MB

Similar Messages

Table/Index size

How do I find out the size of an existing table and an index ?
Thanks

analyze the table or index.
see dba_segments
dba_extents
where segmenT_type in ('TABLE','INDEX'
null

How to obtain the table index in word use LabVIEW Report Generation Toolkit for Microsoft Office

I created a word templete and it had several tables. When I use the "Word Edit Cell" function in LabVIEW Report Generation Toolkit for Microsoft Office, the function need "table index", and I didn't find any function to get or set the table index in word document. How can I achieve my attention to write value to specified table cell using the "Word Edit Cell" function?
Thanks for reply!
YangAfreet

Hi yangafreet
You do not need to get the table index for the word edit cell.vi from anywhere. LabVIEW will automatically index all the tables in the document. See the attatched vi for an example.
Rich
Attachments:
Table Edit.vi ‏23 KB

To Use Cursor or TYPE table Index by PLS_integer

Hi All,
Let's see if I have table with no. of records 19,26,20,000.
If I want to loop through all the records which will be a optimized way To Use Cursor or TYPE table Index by PLS_integer.
Please guide.
Thanks.

What is it you want to do to/with the rows you're looping through?
Ideally you want to avoid looping, as that's row by row (aka slow by slow) processing and it's expensive time-wise.
If you're doing DML (insert/update/delete) then you're best off doing it in one sql statement, rather than looping.

Fact Table index vs BIA Index

BIA gurus..
Prior to our BIA implementation we had the drop and rebuild index process variants in our process chains.
Now after the BIA implementation we have the BIA index roll-up process variant included in the process chain.
Is it still required to have the drop and rebuilt index process variants during data load ?
Do the infocube fact table indexes ever get hit after the BIA implementation ?
Thanks,
Ajay Pathak.

I think you still need the delete/create Index variants as it not only helps in query performance but also speeds up the load to your cubes.
Documentation in Perfomance tab:
"Indices can be deleted before the load process and after the loading is finished be recreated. This accelerates the data loading. However, simultaneous read processes to a cube are negatively influenced: they slow down dramatically. Therefore, this method should only be used if no read processes take place during the data loading."
More details at:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/80/1a6473e07211d2acb80000e829fbfe/frameset.htm]

Need to find total no fo tables/index/m.views in my database

Hello Everyone ;
How can i find total no fo tables/index/m.views in my database ?
when i google i have seen following command ;
SQL> Select count(1) from user_tables where table_name not like '%$%' /
COUNT(1)
but i dont understand what '%$%' indicates ?
Thanks all ;

Hello Everyone ;
How can i find total no fo tables/index/m.views in my database ?
when i google i have seen following command ;
SQL> Select count(1) from user_tables where table_name not like '%$%' /
COUNT(1)
but i dont understand what '%$%' indicates ?
Thanks all ;
consider to simply Read The Fine Manual YOURSELF!
Oracle Database Search Results: like

New tables & indexes created do not show up in dba_segments view

Dear all,
I have created 3 tables and some indexes, but these objects do not show up in dba_segments view. Is this a normal behaviour? Previously, with dictionary managed tablespace, I can specify the minimum extent to create, when the table/index is created. But I'm not sure how the locally managed tablespace work. Please do advice. Thank you very much in advance.
I'm using Oracle 11g R2 (11.2.0.1.0) for Microsoft Windows (x64), running on Windows 7.
For the purpose of reproducing this issue, I have created the tablespaces as follow:
CREATE TABLESPACE CUST_DATA
DATAFILE 'd:\app\asus\oradata\orcl11gr2\CUST_DATA01.DBF' SIZE 512K
AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 256K MAXSIZE 2000K
EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL UNIFORM SIZE 256K
SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO;
CREATE TABLESPACE CUST_INDX
DATAFILE 'd:\app\asus\oradata\orcl11gr2\CUST_INDX.DBF' SIZE 256K
AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 128K MAXSIZE 2000K
EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL UNIFORM SIZE 128K
SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO;
CREATE TABLE CUSTOMER_MASTER (CUST_ID VARCHAR2 (10),
CUST_NAME VARCHAR2 (30),
EMAIL VARCHAR2 (30),
DOB DATE,
ADD_TYPE CHAR (2) CONSTRAINT CK_ADD_TYPE CHECK (ADD_TYPE IN ('B1','B2','H1','H2')),
CRE_USER VARCHAR2 (5) DEFAULT USER,
CRE_TIME TIMESTAMP (3) DEFAULT SYSTIMESTAMP,
MOD_USER VARCHAR2 (5),
MOD_TIME TIMESTAMP (3),
CONSTRAINT PK_CUSTOMER_MASTER PRIMARY KEY (CUST_ID) USING INDEX TABLESPACE CUST_INDX)
TABLESPACE CUST_DATA;
SQL> SELECT TABLE_NAME, TABLESPACE_NAME
2 FROM USER_TABLES
3 WHERE TABLE_NAME LIKE 'CUST%';
TABLE_NAME TABLESPACE_NAME
CUSTOMER_MASTER CUST_DATA
SQL> SELECT INDEX_NAME, TABLESPACE_NAME
2 FROM USER_INDEXES
3 WHERE TABLE_NAME LIKE '%CUST%';
INDEX_NAME TABLESPACE_NAME
PK_CUSTOMER_MASTER CUST_INDX
SQL> SELECT SEGMENT_NAME, SEGMENT_TYPE, TABLESPACE_NAME, BYTES
2 FROM USER_SEGMENTS;
no rows selected

Prior to 11g, when you created a table or whatever, you automatically allocated one extent.
This is now no longer true and depends on a parameter I don't remember.
dba_segments is a summary of dba_extents.
Obviously, if there is no extent allocated, the table (view is defined with inner join) will not show up.
You could qualify this is as a bug and submit a SR to Oracle. But then the performance impact may be huge.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

BWA Fact Table Index Size

Hi
Can anybody tell me how the BWA decides when a fact table index gets split into multiple parts? We have a number of very large cubes that are indexed and some have a fact table index that consists of one logical index which is made up of multiple physical indexes but other, similar sized cubes, just have one very large physical index for the fact table.
With the one very large physical index we seem to get an overload problem but when they are split into multiple parts we don't.
Thanks
Martin

Hi Martin,
this depends on the reorg config and the attribute of the index. You can manually trigger a splitting of an index via command 'ROUNDROBIN x', x stand for the number of parts which the index will be split to. Therefore you have to go into trexadmin standalone tool -> landscape right click on index -> split/merge index...
If you want an automatically split, you have to setup your reorg settings. Goto trexadmin standalone tool -> tab reorg -> options -> here you can choose the type of algorithm. Have a look into note 1313260 and 1163149.
Do you have a scheduled reorg job?
Regards,
Jens
PS: Every black box can be understood...

Copying table data accross a dblink using dbms_datapump

Hi Friends,
I need to copy a table data accross a dblink into another table of same structure.
There is a requirement to use 10g dbms_datapump package to copy the data.
The problem is that I can export into a dump file and then import it into the other database, But we do not need the dump file. We need directly exportimg and simultaneously importing into the table through dblink without generating the intermediate dump file.
If any one have a sample code or document link, Please do help.
cheers

But the application we have that uses the database cannot be changed to read from a CLOBWhy can't you change the application?
Well, anyway you should point out to your superiors that Oracle documented years ago to not use LONGS anymore...
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/datatype.htm#sthref3806
It clearly states:
LONG Datatype
Note:
Do not create tables with LONG columns. Use LOB columns (CLOB, NCLOB) instead. LONG columns are supported only for backward compatibility.
Oracle also recommends that you convert existing LONG columns to LOB columns. LOB columns are subject to far fewer restrictions than LONG columns. Further, LOB functionality is enhanced in every release, whereas LONG functionality has been static for several releases.
How do I go from CLOB to LONG?I'm sorry, cannot help you on that one, I don't think you can do that at all (Oracle wants us to stop using LONGS, so, it's a one-way conversion...):
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:1037232794454#15512131314505
So: NO built_in, you'll need to write a program if the clob is ALWAYS LESS THAN 32k in size, you can use plsql..but is that the case in your case? Only you know that.
I believe that question is still unanswered on this forum, but you might try searchin for answers on this forum, and
the 'Database-General' forum: General Database Discussions
Perhaps you can google a Q&D workaround...
( And consider convincing your collegues to just convert your LONGS to LOBS)
Edited by: hoek on Apr 8, 2009 5:43 PM

Is it permissable to extend an SAP-provided table index?

(Please note I realize this might not be the best forum for this post; I did look at ABAP development, SAP on Oracle, and a few others, but given some other threads, it seemed like this might be the best place for it. Apologies if not).
We have a very large table (GMIA), and I noticed that two customer-created indexes can essentially be combined into one because the first index is RGRANT_NBR plus fields A and B, and the second index is RGRANT_NBR plus fields A, B, C, D, and E. So I might as well get rid of the first index and just keep the second one having RGRANT_NBR plus fields A through E.
However, I noticed that SAP-provided index 4 contains simply one field - RGRANT_NBR. So ideally, I could just add fields A, B, C, D, and E to index 4, then I could get rid of my second customer-created index.
Question: Is it permissable to extend an SAP-provided index like this? As a developer, I'm not in the modifying SAP objects business, but this is the first time I've been presented this situation with a table index. Given that our GMIA table has MILLIONS of records in it, getting rid of another customer-created index completely might be a great opportunity.
Thoughts?
Dave

I really don't have a requirement for this. I'm a developer, and I've noticed some of our biggest timeout issues concern programs that hit table GMIA. So I thought I'd take a look at GMIA and our indexes to learn more about it via SE11 and DB02.
In our Production environment, we have over 88 million records in this table for a table size of 38.23 GB. Aside from the 6 SAP-provided indexes, 8 customer indexes have been created by others over time. It was in looking at these indexes that I noticed our 8th customer index, ZS8, is essentially the same 3 fields as ZS3, plus a few more fields. Ideally, ZS8 should NOT have been created, and ZS3 should have simply been extended with the additional fields.
It was suggested to me in another thread a long while back that I could potentially get rid of ZS3 as well and just make SAP index 4 look like ZS8 because SAP index 4 is just indexed by Grant Number (RGRANT_NBR). ZS8's first index field is Grant Number followed by 5 or 6 additional fields. That's why I was wondering if it was even a "thing" or a possibility to extend an SAP index, but customizing an SAP component makes Dave a very, VERY nervous boy.
Basically, I'm alarmed at the number of records in the table and the number of indexes we have. There's no archiving strategy here, so I probably can't do anything about the number of records in GMIA, which go back to 2006 when we first went live with SAP. But I can clearly get rid of one customer-created index (ZS3). And if I can deactivate SAP index 4, I would assume the system would then automatically use ZS8 since the first field is Grant Number for situations where it would have used SAP index 4.
So that's the background here. Honestly, I don't know how much improvement these things will make, but getting rid of ZS3 will save 5 GB of space, and presumably "deactivating" SAP index 4 would save almost 5 GB as well. I'm assuming we might see some negligible performance gains on our table operations involving GMIA, but it's still a beast with a large number of indexes, so I don't know.
I'm really, really interested in hearing from others' thoughts and recommendations -- your input is MOST welcome here!
Dave

Problem with table-indexes when using select-options in select

Hello experts,
is it right that table-indexes will not be used if you take select-options to select data from the database?
in detail:
i have build up an table-index for one of our db-tables and test it via an test-programm. The first test with '=' comparisons worked fine. Every key of the index was used; checked via ST05!
e.g.:    SELECT * FROM TABLEA INTO ITAB WHERE keya = '1' AND keyb = '2' AND keyc = '3'.
Now i startet the test with select-options
e.g.:   SELECT * FROM TABLEA INTO ITAB WHERE keya IN seltabA AND keyb IN seltabB AND keyc IN seltabC.
First of all i just filled the seltabs with only 1 value:    eg: seltabA=      SIGN = 'I'   OPTION = 'EQ'   LOW = '1'     etc.
Everything worked fine. Every key of the index was used.
But now, I putted more than one entries in the seltabs e.g.
seltabA:      SIGN = 'I'   OPTION = 'EQ'   LOW = '1'
                   SIGN = 'I'   OPTION = 'EQ'   LOW = '2'
                   SIGN = 'I'   OPTION = 'EQ'   LOW = '3'
From now on, the indexed was not used completely (with all keys).
Isn't that strange? How can i use select-options or sel-ranges with using the complete table-indexes?
Thanks a lot,
Marcel

Hi Hermann,
i hope this helps:
this is the first one, which uses the complete index:
SELECT
"KOWID" , "LIFNR" , "KLPOS" , "ORGID" , "KOART" , "MATNR" , "GLTVON" ,
"GLTBIS" , "WERT" , "ABLIF" , "FAKIV" , "AENAM" , "AEDAT" , "AFORM" ,
"HERSTELLER" , "ARTGRP" , "OE_FREITXT" , "ARTFREITEXT" , "STATUS" ,
"TERDAT"
FROM
"/dbcon/01_con"
WHERE
"MANDT" = ? AND "LIFNR" = ? AND "ORGID" = ? AND "KOART_BASIS" = ? AND
"STATUS" = ? AND "GEWAEHR_KOWID" < ? AND ( "STATUS" = ? OR "STATUS" = ? OR
"STATUS" = ? ) WITH UR
RESULT: 5 IXSCAN /dbcon/01_con05 #key columns: 4
And the second one, which does not use the complete index! The 3 ranges are filled each with 2 values. Remember; when i fill them each with only one value, the result is the same as you can see above(/dbcon/01_con05 #key columns: 4):
SELECT
"KOWID" , "LIFNR" , "KLPOS" , "ORGID" , "KOART" , "MATNR" , "GLTVON" ,
"GLTBIS" , "WERT" , "ABLIF" , "FAKIV" , "AENAM" , "AEDAT" , "AFORM" ,
"HERSTELLER" , "ARTGRP" , "OE_FREITXT" , "ARTFREITEXT" , "STATUS" ,
"TERDAT"
FROM
"/dbcon/01_con"
WHERE
"MANDT" = ? AND "LIFNR" IN ( ? , ? ) AND "ORGID" IN ( ? , ? ) AND
"KOART_BASIS" IN ( ? , ? ) AND "GEWAEHR_KOWID" < ? AND ( "STATUS" = ? OR
"STATUS" = ? OR "STATUS" = ? ) WITH UR
and here the access-plan
   0 SELECT STATEMENT ( Estimated Costs = 5,139E+01 [timerons] )
5     1 RETURN
5     2 NLJOIN
5     3 [O] TBSCAN
5     4 SORT
5 TBSCAN GENROW
5     6 <i> FETCH /dbcon/01_con
7 IXSCAN /dbcon/01_con05 #key columns: 2
As you can see, only 2 keys were taken for indexed selection!
Any idea?
Kind regards,
MArcel
Edited by: Marcel Ebert on Jul 28, 2009 5:25 PM

Oracle Table Indexes

Hello.
I'm in the process of putting some indexes on tables for performance improvement of queries run.
eg the foll query -
SELECT MPH_ENTITY_ID, MPH_PRICE_DT, MPH_STCK_EXCHNG_ID, BPT_BP_SHRT_NM, MPH_SEC_ID, SEC_SEC_NM, NMS_SEC_NUM, MPH_PRICE_TYP, MPH_MKT_PRC, MPH_VENDOR, MPH_PRICE_TIME, MPH_EXCHNG_RATE, MPH_DENOM_UNIT, MPH_LOCL_CNC_EQVU, MPH_INDCTV_PRC_IND, MPH_VLM_TRDD, MPH_MRKT_CPTL, MPH_MKT_PRICE_HSTRY_VER, BPT_BSNS_PRTNR_VER, SEC_SEC_MASTER_VER FROM MPH_MKT_PRICE_HSTRY left outer join NMS_NUM_SCHEME on NMS_SEC_ID=MPH_SEC_ID AND NMS_NUM_SCHM='CUSIP',BPT_BSNS_PRTNR,SEC_SEC_MASTER WHERE MPH_ENTITY_ID=BPT_ENTITY_ID AND MPH_STCK_EXCHNG_ID=BPT_BP_ID AND MPH_SEC_ID=SEC_SEC_ID ORDER BY MPH_SEC_ID DESC
The Explain plan in PL/SQL developer shows "Table Access Full" scan for 2 tables - BPT_BSNS_PRTNR AND MPH_MKT_PRICE_HSTRY.
I created the foll 2 indexes and now the explain plan shows "index fast full" scan on these tables -
1) create index mph_3 on mph_mkt_price_hstry(MPH_ENTITY_ID, MPH_PRICE_DT, MPH_STCK_EXCHNG_ID, MPH_SEC_ID, MPH_PRICE_TYP, MPH_MKT_PRC, MPH_VENDOR, MPH_PRICE_TIME, MPH_EXCHNG_RATE, MPH_DENOM_UNIT, MPH_LOCL_CNC_EQVU, MPH_INDCTV_PRC_IND, MPH_VLM_TRDD, MPH_MRKT_CPTL, MPH_MKT_PRICE_HSTRY_VER);
2) create index BPT_8 on bpt_bsns_prtnr(BPT_BP_SHRT_NM,BPT_BSNS_PRTNR_VER,BPT_ENTITY_ID,BPT_BP_ID);
My question here is that I have included columns in the select clause also in the indexes and the scan type has improved from table access full to index fast full scan. Is this correct ? Should select columns be also a part of indexes ? My take was that indexes contain columns in "where" clause or columns where joins are implemented and not select columns.
Please suggest.

An Index that includes all the columns of the SELECT clause with those of the WHERE clause is a "skinny table".
Using such an Index avoids accesses to the table entirely.
There are situations where the DBA or Designer may choose to create such an Index.
Downsides ?*
If there are too many columns in the Index, the Index itself may become too large. When the index is too large for Oracle to be able to cache blocks, Oracle may have to undertake multiple single block read calls to the OS if accessing many rows. This can make the index counter-productive.
Index maintenance overheads increase -- the probability that the index also has to be updated with every UPDATE statement on the table increases. Also, every INSERT and DELETE makes that much more effort updating the Index Leaf Blocks (ie the size of the update to the Index is larger, the Index Key being larger).
Some queries might be executed using Skip Scan Search of the index when, properly, it might have made more sense to put those query columns in a seperate index.

Dropping table indexes prior to using the MERGE utility

I am being asked to change the processing done when updates are being applied to the database.
Process:
1. Initial data load - Use SQL Loader to load the main database tables.
2. Daily data load - Use SQL Loader to load records to temporary tables and then use MERGE utility to insert new records and update existing records in the main database tables. Just prior to starting the MERGE utility, I drop the indexes on the main database tables. At the end of the MERGE, I re-create the indexes.
The problem seems to be the application using the database can't handle the queries if the indexes are dropped and being readded.
Does anyone have any ideas?

I am currently dropping indexes because when the MERGE processing takes place, it can insert new records or update existing records (based on the primary keys matching).
When I started to use the MERGE, I don't think the update was successful because the primary key constraint. So I disabled the primary keys indexing and other contraints during the MERGE. Then recreated at the end of the MERGE. Perhaps I need to revisit the information for MERGE.
I don't have any real benchmarking other than the application developers indicating that they experience the application processing delay during the daily load. I've thought about loading into a shadow table and rename at the end of the load but it not really be possible now.

SQL Developer Behavior When Gathering Table/Index Statistics

Hey All,
Not sure if this has been posted yet. I did a search and did not find any threads on the topic though.
I noticed with SQL Developer 2.x, when you using the context menu to gather table/index statistics for a given table, you get no modal progress/waiting window like you did in 1.x. It just kind of "does nothing", even though it did actually execute the DBMS_STATS package. If you press cancel and try to navigate around, you get multiple "Connection is Busy" errors. Eventually it will come back and say "Statistics gathered for table <whatever>". In the old versions there was just a modal window with an animated progress bar while it ran the DBMS_STATS package. What happened to that? Or is this something unique to my install? Anyone else ran into this? Is there a fix or somewhere I can report this as an official bug? FWIW I'm running 2.1.1.64, and this did occur in the initial 2.0 release.
It is very confusing the first time you run into it... I pressed the "apply" button several times thinking it didn't take, but it ended up running the DBMS_STATS for every click I did.
Thanks!

Same happens to all the other context menu opened dialogs. Indeed very confusing at first and disturbing.
The only official site to report bugs is Metalink/MOS, but you might be lucky if someone from the team picks it up here.
Regards,
K.

Oracle Sys table index rebuild

hi, expert
I am new to this expert Forums
Blow Table Index are rebuild,This table are relation with sys user or not?
after rebuild index, getting error in alert log file
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [psdnop-1], [1410], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-01410: invalid ROWID
when trying to select * from dba_network_acls getting error massage Rowid invalid
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003684 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003683 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003682 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003681 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_IOT_TOP_54056 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003677 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_IL0000054052C00002$$ REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_IOT_TOP_54044 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003675 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_IOT_TOP_54038 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_IOT_TOP_54031 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_IOT_TOP_54028 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_IOT_TOP_54018 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.DR_STOPLIST_PK REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.DR_STOPLIST_UNIQ REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.DR_THS_BT REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.DR_UNIQ_THS_BT REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_IOT_TOP_54003 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.DR_THS_RINGID REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.DR_UNIQ_THS_PHRASE REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003629 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003626 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003627 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_IOT_TOP_53991 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_IOT_TOP_53963 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX OLAPSYS.SYS_C004604 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX OLAPSYS.SYS_C004600 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX XDB.SYS_C003740 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX XDB.SYS_C003741 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX XDB.SYS_C003742 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX MDSYS.UNIQUE_CLASS_CONSTRAINT REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX MDSYS.UNIQUE_USER_CONSTRAINT REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX MDSYS.UNIQUE_LRS_GEOM_LAYER REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX MDSYS.UNIQUE_NETWORK_LAYER REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX MDSYS.UNIQUE_NETWORK_LINK_LAYER REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX MDSYS.UNIQUE_NETWORK_NODE_LAYER REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX MDSYS.UNIQUE_NETWORK_PATH_LAYER REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX MDSYS.UNIQUE_NETWORK_PATH_LINK_LAYER REBUILD;
It is possible to recreate this index again to solve this problem, or any other solution.
Thanks in Advance sir,

Pl do not post duplicate threads - Oracle sys Index rebuild then Getting error Invalid Error Ora-01410

Moving tables & indexes accross other TS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for