Multiple Field as a Part of the Single Search

WOW, Jheadstart is the way to go!!
Here is a quick question to expedite my learning process if you don't mind since my customer needs to see something in couple of weeks.
I created a single search screen from a group based on what has been generated by the Jheadstart Designer, but only one field is generated. Now, at this point, is there a way to have multiple field generated or I need to customize the generated JSP or UIX screen? Same things for the methods that are involved, will I need to customized certain Action Class methods to include to two attributes as a part of this search.
I thank you for your explanations and would greatly appreciate any sample codes available that you can refer to or explain.
Kamran

hi,Shalini.
Using Message directly, you can not achieve what you want easily.
Instead, i thought out one way, you can judge and check whether it can help you a little.
You don't use the Message manager directly, that means: don't display your message.
Now, you have one context attribute named "context_msg" which has type "String".
In addition, you have defined one Link-to-action UI element which is bound with the context attribute "context_msg".
When you get the message, use the following
message e001(ID) with <variable> into lw_msg.
or if you use Exception class
lw_msg = lo_exp->get_text( ).
Then you can set the context attribute "context_msg" with the "lw_msg".
Now, you can implement your action handler for the action of Link-to-action as you want, i.e. open another pop-up window.
I don't know whether it can fit your requirement or not.
Hope it can help you a little.
Best wishes.

Similar Messages

Inventory on Hand Report - Using Union ALL - need two fields to be part of the group

Hi all,
I have created an Inventory "on Hand" Report that takes the Current Inventory from the Item Entry table and the Sales from Unposted Sales Line table and Transfers in and out from the Unposted Transfer Line table. I have joined the tables
using the UNION ALL function.
My problem is that the Transfer table has two locations whereas the other tables only have one. I am grouping on Location code from the Item Entry table which is equivalent to BOTH Transfer from location and the Transfer to.
As an example, there are 15lbs of inventory for Product A in Location #1 with a transfer out of 15 lbs. The Transfer out is going to Location #2
I don't know how to write the query or set up the group so that it recognizes both the Transfer to and the Transfer From fields
I want the report to look similar to the one below but I can only get it to show one of the locations. Is there some way to use the Union function and have one field in the first table be or equivalent to two fields in another?
Location Code
Item No.
Lbs
Sales Orders
Transfer Out
Transfer In
Available Inventory
Location #1
Product A
15
-15
Location #1
15
-15
Location #2
Product A
15
15
Location #2
15
15

Hi Igor,
You can get a custom sort order added to your IP column without the need for a second column.
Consider that the sorting is done strictly left-to-right across a string in the column. The string can be any valid HTML content. So, you could wrap your string within, say, a SPAN tag and add an attribute to that tag that contains the sort order you need before the text that is displayed to the user. As long as the attribute is correctly structured (that is, all instances are of the same length, for example), then sorting will work correctly. For example:
SELECT
'' || IP || '' Y
FROM ...Now you need to ensure that the PAD_IP_ADDRESS() function returns the correct values. In IP addresses, you have anything from "0.0.0.0" to "255.255.255.255". To get them to sort "numerically", you need to pad one or two digit numbers to get three digit numbers for each value - so, "0.0.0.0" becomes "000.000.000.000". You could create a function to do this - something like:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION PAD_IP_ADDRESS
pIP IN VARCHAR2
RETURN VARCHAR2
IS
vIP VARCHAR2(15);
vTEMP APEX_APPLICATION_GLOBAL.VC_ARR2;
vSEP VARCHAR2(1);
BEGIN
vSEP := '';
vIP := '';
vTEMP := APEX_UTIL.STRING_TO_TABLE(pIP,'.');
FOR x IN 1..vTEMP.COUNT
LOOP
 vIP := vIP || vSEP || TRIM(TO_CHAR(TO_NUMBER(vTEMP(x)),'000'));
 vSEP := '.';
END LOOP;
RETURN vIP;
END;The output from this would look something like:
1.1.1.1
2.255.255.255
10.1.199.098Andy

Selecting Multiple fields from fillable form in Adobe Reader

I created a form in Adobe Pro, and want to be able to select multiple fields to cut and paste the results in other parts of the form.
Does anyone know of a way to do this?
I would appreciate any help! Thankyou

Go to Form Edit mode, and then you can select multiple fields either in the Fields list, or on the page itself (using Ctrl), or by holding down the mouse and dragging the selection square over them. Then just Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V in the other page, and you'll get copies.
Edit: This can only be done in Acrobat, though. Your title talks about Reader but you post is about Acrobat...

Primary key based on multiple fields which are of a custom class type

Hello!
I have the following two classes.
public class Application
protected String appName;
protected Set moduleOptions = new HashSet(); //Set<ModuleOption>
public class Option
protected String name;
protected Application application;
Now, I need for Option to have a composite primary key based on both its
fields. How do I do this?
For starters, I just need a few hints on how this should be done in Kodo
because I already have this thing working in JPOX and that solution does
not map directly to Kodo. JPOX defines the OptionPK (primary key class)
to contain field ApplicationPK, and not Application. But Kodo does not
accept this because of a mismatch between fields in class and its primary
key class. (Not implying that Kodo should accept the same kind of
solution.)
Btw, I'm evaluating version 3.2.3.
Thanks in advance!

Viktor,
The typical Kodo pattern for doing this is to create a private field in
Option for each primary key in Application, map those fields as
primary-key (but not the field of type Application), and therefore put
those fields in the OptionPK. These fields should then be mapped to the
same columns as the Application reference. Then, set the primary key
fields to the same value as they are in the related object.
Kodo allows multiple fields to be mapped to the same column in the
database, and throws an exception if your actions would set the column
to different values. So, typically, this might look like:
public class Application
protected String appName; // I'm assuming that this is the PK
protected Set moduleOptions = new HashSet ();
public class Option
protected String name; // pk
protected Application application; // not pk
private String applicationAppName; // pk
public Option (String n, Application a)
name = n;
application = a;
applicationAppName = a.appName;
-Patrick
Viktor Matic wrote:
Hello!
I have the following two classes.
public class Application
protected String appName;
protected Set moduleOptions = new HashSet(); //Set<ModuleOption>
public class Option
protected String name;
protected Application application;
Now, I need for Option to have a composite primary key based on both its
fields. How do I do this?
For starters, I just need a few hints on how this should be done in Kodo
because I already have this thing working in JPOX and that solution does
not map directly to Kodo. JPOX defines the OptionPK (primary key class)
to contain field ApplicationPK, and not Application. But Kodo does not
accept this because of a mismatch between fields in class and its primary
key class. (Not implying that Kodo should accept the same kind of
solution.)
Btw, I'm evaluating version 3.2.3.
Thanks in advance!

Apply Script to multiple fields

I have a form with multiple fields that will contribute to a total. Is there a way to have script apply to multiple fields that will auto update the totals, instead of scripting a separate exit event for each field.
Thank you

Create a Script Object. In that object, you can have a function like this:
function addMyFields() // add values in the fields
var number1 = field1.rawValue;
var number2 = field2.rawValue; // and so on
var sumOp = number1 + number2; // + number3 + .... and so on
totalField.rawValue = sumOp; // display sum in total field
Paste the following code in the exit event of each field:
ScriptObjectName.addMyFields();
Let me know if it works for you.

Auto Suggest with multiple fields?

Hello,
I am planning on using the autosuggest on a project I'm
working on, and was surprised by the lack of support for multiple
fields. Correct me if I'm wrong, but right now you can only search
for the 'name' field or 'age' etc. I would like to be able to enter
some text in the textinput field, and it would search both 'name'
and 'username' in the dataset. Is this possible with the current
widget?
Thanks,
Maquelly

Hello Maquelly,
Indeed the Auto Suggest widget do not support filtering the
data against multiple fields simultaneously if the data is filtered
on the client side. I will add this as an enhancement request for
this brand new widget. We have only support for multiple fields to
be displayed in the suggestion list which is a spry:region, you can
insert the values of multiple fields concatenated through the
spryLsuggest tag buy we are not able to check multiple fields,
We have implemented also the ability to send the value typed
on the server and expect a new XML with the filtered data. This
method allow you to achieve your goak as you can control
completelly the filtering algorithm that sends the data back in
browser. We have some samples in the Spry 1.5 preview.
Regards,
Cristian MARIN

Need Check Box Help using Acrobat Multiple Fields

I am trying to get the check marks on this form to act as individual units that can be tabbed through (going down left column, then to right column). I used the "Place Multiple Fields" command to get all the check boxes in. Now, when I do my preview test run, if one box is checked more than one gets checked off someplace else in the form. I want them each work as their own unit and not be associated wiht the other boxes. Do I have to draw each one of these in individually to get this to work the way I want it to work? I am guessing that can't be true. This is a computer after all.I am betting it is an adjustment I need to make to the "Place Mulitple Field" command when I put them in???? I know this one will be a simple answer witha simple soultion. I'm tap dancing all around it and just can't get it. The visual shoudl expalin it all. Thank you.
I check on one box in the left column and it also checks other boxes in the right column or elsewhere.

You need to give each separate check box a unique name. If check boxes have the same name and export value, they will behave that way. If several check boxes have the same name but unique export values, they will behave as a group, where only one in the group can be selected, very similar to how a radio button group normally would behave.

Customised metadata - search for multiple fields?

Background: I'm logging a STACK of footage and attempting to arrange it all by a series of different keyword categories (the day the footage was shot, location, camera type, content type, key players, etc). Each category has multiple variables (ie: in the camera category the options are Sony FS700, Canon 5D, Canon 600D, GoPro). I'm adding custom fields via the PPr Project Metadata>Add Property function using a simple Boolean tickbox.
Question: Is there a way to sort and search the custom fields? For example if I wanted to pull up all the footage shot on day 5, with the Sony, that comprises of interview content with a particular person is there a way to search for all these fields? I've been able to search for one keyword if I tag the material but so far searching and organising by multiple fields has eluded me.
The long way round is to create multiple bins and/or sequences for each variable in each category by hand, but that's a little tedious and has the potential to bloat the project. Any ideas to solve the problem? I've come from FCP a few months ago so the metadata side of PPro is still something I'm getting my head around. Thanks for reading!
EDIT: I'm running PPro CC for reference and can install and use Prelude if it helped.

For the time being I'm using a workaround employing titles above the footage to signify the relevant categories, and tagging significant moments in clips with markers, but it is perplexing.. Premiere seems to employ metadata in a phenomenal way - such that I haven't come across in any other mainstream editor - I just wish it had the functionality to sort and manage all that metadata it is producing beyond the search bar in the Project window.
Premiere gurus and Adobe affiniados: am I missing something obvious?

Multipe AD yet Single Search Scope - CUCM/CUC

Hi all,
Wondering if anyone has had experience integrating mutiple ADs (different forests and domains) with a single CUCM. The CUCM has a limit of 5 ldap directories but even more impotantly only a single search scope.
The following document describes using ADLDS which would solve the multiple AD scenario but would this solve the single search scope issue as well (same goes for CUC)?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_configuration_example09186a0080b2b103.shtml
Any pointers appreciated.
Thanks,
Kamran

Hi Chris,
Thanks tip, thats the solution i was alluding to above. It would solve the 5 ldap directory limit issue but I am not clear about the single search scope limitation.
From my testing, it seems that the LDAP would sync multiple ADs (in their own domains) into a separate partition - will try to get some screenshots. So my questions are:
1) Is this correct? would ADLDS sync separete ADs (in separate domains) in a separate partition? I am basing this on an assumption we will need to run the ADLDS sync with all ADs separately.
2) Where do we point our search scope on the ADLDS so that it syncs all ADs sync'ed to the ADLDS?
Thanks,
Kamrna

Splitting the single field data to multiple fields

Hi,
I have the contents in fieldABC which i would like to copy based on the length of the value
Eg:
Field ABC has value 1
it need to be copied to Field1
FILEDABAC has 1234
it need to be copy in field 2
FILEDABC has 1234ABC
It need to be copy in Field 3
i means to say based on the lenght of the value i would like to copy the contents to multiple fields
Note: the data is for Heirachy...
Can anyone will help with code.
Thanks

Hi,
You mean you want to copy contents of field ABC to Field1,Field2,Field3 based on there length??
if i have correctly understood you then do like:
data : g_strlen type i.
g_strlen = strlen ( ABC ).
if g_strlen = 1.
 field1 = ABC.
elseif g_strlen > 1 and g_strlen <= 4.
 field2 = ABC.
elseif g_strlen > 4 .
 field3 = ABC.
endif.
Regards,
Neha

New to the product - question about validating multiple fields as a group

I have a static form that I'm building from a word document. Part of that form requires a person to fill any 3 out 5 text fields.
Since it looks like scripts are applied on a field by field basis, is it possible to have a script that encompasses multiple fields?
Would any script need to be applied to each field in turn?
Assuming the answer to question 1 is a yes, how would you script it to require x number of fields out of a total of y to have some sort of content in order to validate?
I'm pretty familiar with JavaScript and am looking at the Scripting reference guides but was hoping for a helping hand to get me there quicker as I'm in a bit of a time crunch - doing 18 forms with validation and database connectivity by January 15 certainly qualifies in my book.
I would assume you'd do something like this but am unsure of the syntax...
Get values of each field
Set a valid counter variable for the number of fields with content
If field 1 is not empty, increment the valid counter
(rinse and repeat)
if the valid counter is less than 3 throw an error message
Many thanks in advance for any help offiered

1). Yes, scripting within Livecycle can be for a single field or even static text, images and other artifacts within the PDF. Really anything, within Adobe's reason, when it comes to scripting.
2). It depends on what you want to do. Things like field validations, calculations and other instances where fields are tied togther really dictate how the script runs.
3). Fields that have calculations or validations with them work in the same, I believe. So for example I have a PDF that I made that is an Excel-type sheet that contains a few hundred cells and every single one has some type of validation or calculation associated with it. I generally run the calculations/validations from the user inputting the data and then after that the script runs, but again, it really dpeneds on what you are doing and with what, so answering some of your questions are a bit difficult.
Javascrip/Formcalc are wonderful tools within PDF, but don't forget the Action Builder (Tools -Action Builder). It is a set of preloaded actions that are turn-key. Just select the cells that will have the action and select the result you want from the preloaded list of actions, using those actions can get you very far, and most of all; they are quick to implement without researching code. So for example, you could use the Action Builder to create an action that checks certain fields and if they are null to return a 1 value to a specific numericField (these could be hidden). Then have a "total" numericField (this would be your counter) that adds all of those fields with the 1 in it. Then create another Action Builder for that "total" numericField and if it is less than 3, display a message box that is a warning.

Splitting the single record into multiple records based on validity

Hi Guru's,
basically i am an BI consultant with less knowledge on ABAP, can i request your help on the ABAP task.
I am working on HR module which is integrated with SAP BI, the reports will be executed based on calendar month the requirement is i should split the single record into a multiple records based on validity of the record. basically the HR data would be in data from and date to.
below is the logic
Check whether the start and end date of the record are in the same month and year.
If yes  nothing changes
If no  create multiple records
1st record  original start date of the record u2018till end of that month
Following record  1st of the next month u2018till last day of the month
u2026
Last record  1st of the month u2018till original end date.
All fields will have the same values, only the datefrom and dateto fields change.
Can any one please provide me the same code to proceed on my task.
Thanks and Regards,
Venkat

Hi,
Using Rule group we can split it.
Using Rule Group in SAP-BI Part - 1
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/business-intelligence/s-u/using%20rule%20group%20in%20sap-bi%20%20part%20-%201.pdf
Thanks
Reddy

Using a single master data infoobject for multiple fields

Hello experts. Today I ran un with the following problem: I am modelling an Infocube and will be receiving a flat file with several fields, of which 3 of them give information about sales representatives.
For each transaction there are 1-3 sales representatives involved, and this is reflected in the file I am going to be loading. If only one representative is involved, it means that he was in charge of a complete negotiation, and his code will be found in all three fields, if two representatives are involved, it means that one was in charge of one part of the negotiation, while the other was in charge of the rest, and according to what they were in charge, their code will appear in one or two of the fields. If three representatives are involved, each one's code will appear on the field corresponding to the part of the negotiation they were in charge of handling.
I already have the sales representative's codes as master data, but I was wondering how I can have those three fields map into the same InfoObject, if that is possible at all. Maybe in the transformation I map them to the same object? Also, what happens when you create the Data Source? As far as I know, each field in the Data Source must be unique, which makes it impossible to use my ZSALESREP InfoObject for the three fields, at least at Data Source level. What can I do in this case?

Hi Pedro Olvera,
You need 3 infoobjects in datasouce to load 3 different fields.
If you want load to a single infoobject, you can map accordingly in transformation, bult last field overwrites previous one.
Its better to maintain 3 fields in cube. Create 2 more sales Reps(ZSALESREP1 & ZSALESREP2) with Reference to ZSALESREP then you no need to maintain master data for ZSALESREP1 & ZSALESREP2.
Use these 3 fields for modeling.
Hope it Helps
Srini
[Dont forget to close the call by assigning poings.... - Food for Points: Make a Difference through Community Contribution!|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/index?rid=/webcontent/uuid/007928c5-c4ef-2a10-d9a3-8109ae621a82]

How do I sign multiple fields in a pdf without saving untill the end?

I have Acrobat 9 and I am trying to put in 20-50 signature fields all to be signed by the same person in one to however many sittings. For every signature it prompts to "Save As". I work in the medical field so all our training is tied up in medical topics plus computers are not the favorite but needed medium. I need it to sign with only a quick prompt to agree to sign for each one then save to the same pdf or save as if decided after the person is done signing what they need for that day. After all signatures are signed a final ending one to lock all the rest would be nice. The signatures are replacing initials for training topics with the final being the "I have been training to proper levels and agree to the assessment" kind of statment. So this thing can't be signed in one day but multiple have to be signed in one sitting with some ease if anyone is to use it. I would real like to get this thing going if anyone can help.

I hate to say it, but adding 20-50 signatures to a document isn't efficient, and by that I mean Acrobat doesn't handle that many signatures efficiently. Part of the problem is Acrobat must verify each digital signature separately and it will end up slowing things down for you (and by slowing things down I mean effectively locking up the computer). Every time you add another signature Acrobat validates all of the previous signatures to ensure the document integrity for the signature being created. Also, every time the file is opened each signature would get verified.
That said, you could (and this is only a suggestion) author the file using checkboxs and then using one digital signtaure at the end of the process that locks the file so the checkboxes can't be changed
Steve

How do I move multiple fields from the end of the document to another section?

For some reason when I click Cntrl+V, it pastes the multiple fields at the end of my form rather than at the point of paste within the document.

Select all of the fields that you wish to copy then use Ctrl-C. Scroll to the part of the form where you want to paste the copied fields. Select the field that you want the paste to occur after (ie, the pasted fields will appear after/below the selected field) and use Ctrl-V.
Jeff Canepa
Software Quality Engineer
Adobe Systems, Inc.
[email protected]

Multiple Field as a Part of the Single Search

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for