Novell seems to be very slow on DataInputStream

Hi,
can somebody confirm this?
I wrote a java program that reads about 2-3 MB of data from a DataInputStream and this takes about 20-30 times of a read from a local HDD AND even from a Samba Server.
Local: about 7 seconds
Samba: even about 7 seconds
Novel: more than a minute
Can this be a configuration problem on Novell File System / Blocksize?
Thanks
Dominik

Maybe a Novell drive is more sensitive to the presence or the absence of appropriate buffering, than a local or a SAMBA drive.
Do you apply appropriate buffering?

Similar Messages

  • Having just bought an iMac and set every thing up I have found that my IPad seems to run very slow. I have also just updated the IPad to OS 5.1 .Are these two things connected or is there a problem with the IPad

    Having just bought an iMac and set every thing up I have found that my IPad seems to run very slow. I have also just updated the IPad to OS 5.1 .Are these two things connected or is there a problem with the IPad

    Using the Mac with your iPad has nothing to do with the fact that the iPad is running slow. There could be any number of reasons why the iPad is now running slow.
    Have you tried a reset on the iPad?
    Reset the iPad by holding down on the sleep and home buttons at the same time for about 10-15 seconds until the Apple Logo appears - ignore the red slider - let go of the buttons.

  • My pad seems to be very slow

    My pad seem very slow and sticky

    Try This...
    Close All Open Apps...  Perform a Reset... Try again...
    Reset  ( No Data will be Lost )
    Press and hold the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button at the same time for at least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears. Release the Buttons.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1430
    Also consider Deleting any Apps you have Purchased / Downloaded but you now never use..

  • Localhost Application seems to be very slow?

    Hey,
    i built an Air App wich use Colfusion to query a database and stuff like that...
    On my mashine, this is real fast - If i run the App on another Pc in our local-Network the requests are very very slow. Is that normal ?
    Greetings from germany, nico

    I don't know anything about AIR, but where's the DB in relation to your machine, and then again in relation to the other machines that are slow?  Any network differences?
    What's performance like on the slow machines if you use a standard DB client to make the same queries that the AIR app is making?
    Adam

  • My macbook seems to be very slow in connectivity to the internet using our airport extreme while others can just go buzzing along surfing the net and/or downloading items. What gives with mine?

    i don't understand why my Macbook seems to balk or go incredibly slow when I'm trying to connect or surf the internet at home. When I'm at work ( I use a company owned laptop and have used one of their laptops for several years, this one noe for about three years but have just started having this problem in the last 6 - 8 months) it works fine but at home slow, slow, slow!!! at home it takes about 3-5  minutes for any page to load in and if there are a lot of images or videos to load, well take a coffee break while it loads in when you come back the page might, might be loaded. I'm using my partners ibook G4 right now and connectivity is great no problem but mine had yet to even load in the apple homepage yet and I had to go get this one, turn it on, open up a browser, log in, type my question out and yet over on my laptop, it's still trying to load.Can anyone give me a clue as to what's going on?

    i don't understand why my Macbook seems to balk or go incredibly slow when I'm trying to connect or surf the internet at home. When I'm at work ( I use a company owned laptop and have used one of their laptops for several years, this one noe for about three years but have just started having this problem in the last 6 - 8 months) it works fine but at home slow, slow, slow!!! at home it takes about 3-5  minutes for any page to load in and if there are a lot of images or videos to load, well take a coffee break while it loads in when you come back the page might, might be loaded. I'm using my partners ibook G4 right now and connectivity is great no problem but mine had yet to even load in the apple homepage yet and I had to go get this one, turn it on, open up a browser, log in, type my question out and yet over on my laptop, it's still trying to load.Can anyone give me a clue as to what's going on?

  • A document with more no of sheets seem to work very slow in pages. How to increase speed of processing

    A document with more no of sheets in it seems to work slow. Speed of processing is dull. An error message ( error code 43 ) appeared while working in pages.

    Also, try holding down the Command and the R keys
    during boot to get into the Recovery HD.  From there
    select Disk Utility and perform a Repair Pemissions
    and a Repair Disk on the OSX install partition.
    If that doesn't help, you may want to get some additional
    test and/or repair software to check the hard disk and
    other hardware.  Tech Tool Pro comes to mind, as it
    can run tests on various hardware aspects of the system.
    Disk Warrior is another program that can test file systems
    and look for file corruption.  You should be able to get
    these programs on line depending on where you are.
    This sounds suspiciously like file corruption going on
    which can be software caused or a hard disk that is
    starting to go bad or just a few sectors that went bad
    is some key spots.
    Going back to Snow Leopard will not help if there are
    are problems with the files or, hopefully not, the hard disk.

  • Firefox seems to be very slow today in loading is there any performance test on line?

    Browsing through web pages I see it is much slower than usual-is there any on line application test available?

    Maybe one of the online speed test sites (Google: speed test).
    *http://www.ip-adress.com/speedtest/
    *http://www.speedtest.net/index.php

  • JNI call seem to be very slow

    Hello,
    I have an optimized JPEG decoder written in C++, I have a JNI bridge to that codebase with this method:
    Java-side:
    public static native byte[] readJPEG(String name);C++ side:
    JNIEXPORT const jbyteArray JNICALL Java_IPPJPEGDecoder_readJPEG(JNIEnv *, jclass, jstring);I have this call in Java layer:
    long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
    byte[] data = IPPJPEGDecoder.readJPEG("C:\\D-102_red_ink_1.JPG");
    long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
    System.out.println("total time = " + (end - start));This is my method in C++ (rough/ugly code, don't judge me :) )
    JNIEXPORT const jbyteArray JNICALL Java_IPPJPEGDecoder_readJPEG (JNIEnv * env, jclass jobj, jstring jpeg_filename)
        //cout << "INVOKED IPPJPEGDecoder.readJPEG() SUCCESSFULL" << endl;
        //cout << "Started"<<endl;
        CIppImage m_image;
        CIppImage grayscale_image;
        CIppImage monochrome_image;
        CTimer timer;
        timer.Start();
        CStdFileInput in;
        const IppLibraryVersion* libver = ippGetLibVersion();
        cout << "LibraryVersion = (" << libver->Name <<": " << libver->Version << ")"<<endl;
        UIC::BaseStream::TStatus status;
        jboolean iscopy;
        const char * filename = env->GetStringUTFChars(jpeg_filename,&iscopy);
        status = in.Open(filename);
        GetImageFromJPEGJNI(in, m_image, timer);
        cout<<"m_image: (Precision: " << m_image.Precision() << ", NumChannels: " <<m_image.NChannels()<<", Width: " << m_image.Width() << ", Height: " << m_image.Height()<< ", Color: " << m_image.Color() <<", step: " << m_image.Step()<<endl;
        timer.Start();
        cout << "data array size of image : " <<(m_image.Step()*m_image.Height())<<endl;
        jbyteArray jb = env->NewByteArray(m_image.Step()*m_image.Height());
        env->SetByteArrayRegion(jb,0, m_image.Step()*m_image.Height(),(const jbyte*)m_image.DataPtr());
        timer.Stop();
        double mytime = timer.GetTime();
        cout << "JNI occurred in " << mytime << " ms"<<endl;
        return jb;
        //return NULL;
    }When I call this code, the C++ codeblock reports as running in 92.7793 ms
    My java code reports back: 572 ms
    is the Call to the JNI method THAT INSANELY slow !?!?! I MUST be doing something wrong... this is in Windows XP and I'm linking against my own dll that I compiled in Microsoft Visual C++ 2008.
    The jbyteArray that I'm passing back has a length of 33583500
    ... maybe it's the conversion from jbyteArray to Java's byte[] that is causing all the overhead.... are there any ways around that?
    Thanks!!
    Alessandro Ferrucci

    alessandro_ferrucci wrote:
    I need to process about *500 MILLION* images...this speed difference matters So at 1 second per image it will take 16 years. Or with 100 machines 2 months.
    JNI Code completes in 337 ms (still about 200 ms faster than ImageIO's libjpeg on my machine),So now you are down to 5 years. Or 20 days with 100 machines.
    Course all of the above is 24x7 dedicated processing.
    If it was me I would look into changing the requirements and the architecture.
    Probably cost effective to hire several senior level programmers with experience in image processing and/or performance optimization as well.

  • My e-mail seems to be very slow to open on MSN. Why is this happening all of a sudden?

    Firefox opens at start of sign-in on my mac. I then open msn.com, it is a little slow opening, but really gets slow when I try to open my e-mail. You can click on the mail and nothing happens...not sure why or how this began?

    Double tap the screen with three fingers to switch off zoom. Go to Settings and switch off zoom so you don't accidentally switch it on again.
    Google ""iphone manual".

  • DNS-Resolve seems to be very slow.

    Hello together,
    I recently wrote a program that does some p2p functionality.
    Each instance of the program is a server and a client.
    The clients/servers hostnames are contained in a configuration file.
    Now, if a clients starts the programm it starts a server-thread and trys to connect
    to the other clients. This works well if all clients are running the program.
    If a clients computer is offline, logically the address can not be resolved.
    Under these circumstances, the resolve (or better: not resolve) takes more than
    2 seconds.
    Is there any possibility to shorten this delay?
    Thank you for any advice.
    Mark

    Yes, I actually using windows.
    If the computer is offline why are you try to connect
    to another server anyway?Hm, this is a partial solution, cause if I first start the program, I simply don't know
    wether the other clients are online.
    But generally you are right, I don't have to connect to clients that are offline.
    Right now, I am wondering very much about threads in connection with sockets.
    For the process of synchronization I am using threads. For each client connection one.
    The parent thread waits until each thread has finished, funny isn't it?
    Thank you.
    Kind regards Mark.

  • PI 7.1 ESR and Java Webstart very slow

    Hi,
    I have been using the PI ESR and IB on the snow leapord OS with Mozilla and Safari browsers. The java webstart seems to be very slow  and working on the ESR objects is sometimes a pain as it takes long time to save , activate or change and sometimes I end up java heap space issues although we are running at a 2 gig heap size. Is it only me or is anyone else facing the same issue?
    Is it time to go back to good old windows XP? or can this be fixed in Mac ...I love my Mac for other reasons though...:)
    Teresa

    Hi,
    >>>serverXXXPI71
    add this server info with related IP address into your hosts file
    and it will work
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk

  • Very Slow Backup

    I have a 500 GB USB hard drive that I can move files to very quickly. When I select it as my Time Machine Hard Drive the the backup runs very slow. According to the tracking bar it's only backing up about 100 MB every 2 min + I stopped spotlight from indexing the drive but it didn't make a noticeable difference. The drive is currently formated Extended but I've tried Extended (Journaled) also. The backup seems to be working and I have not seen a large performance hit. It just seems to be very slow.
    Does anyone have an idea what I could have wrong?
    Thanks

    You probably are not in any danger. The first TM backup has huge amounts of things to do beside just copying your boot volumes data. It builds a data base and collects a bunch of other info to keep track of things.
    How much data does Time Machine pref panel show it has to backup ?
    Let's say it's 150 GB. Then a USB2 device will get on average around 12 MB/sec. That's some 43 GB per hour. Thus for 150 GB the backup will take 3.5 hrs.
    Be patient and let TM backup finish.
    Are you see a rotating set of arrows in the Finder side bar to right of your TM backup USB device ? Also, there could be a small backup status window floating about somewhere that shows the backup progress as well.

  • Moving files in Lr - very slow

    I'm sure this has been discussed before, but the search on "move" does not return anything.
    My issue: moving files between folders (on the same drive) seems to be very slow in Lr. Is there anyway to improve performance. The current performance I am seeing, often 20-30 seconds to move a file, is unworkable. I am trying to reorganize a significant number of files, which are also in collections.
    OS: Vista
    Computer: Dell quad core
    Disk file indexing = off
    Thanks in advance
    Rory

    I too find most of the usual operations--move, copy, make new folder ,etc, inordinately slow compared to using a file browser, or photo browser, such as Bridge. I do a lot of that, but not in LR, unless it is just the odd image that needs moving as I am working.
    Better off doing that on the outside, and then resynching the directories, or even the entire collection (while you eat dinner) to make sure the db is kept up to date reflecting your moves.

  • Is anyone having trouble with recharging battery on ipad4? It does charge but is very slow

    I have a new iPad and it seems to be very slow in charging the battery eg 1 hour for 10% of charge.
    Is anyone else experiencing this problem or am I doing something wrong?

    The quickest way (and really the only way) to charge your iPad is with the included 10W or 12W (5W on Mini) USB Power Adapter. iPad will also charge, although more slowly, when attached to a computer with a high-power USB port (many recent Mac computers) or with an iPhone Power Adapter (5W). When attached to a computer via a standard USB port (2.5W, most PCs or older Mac computers) iPad will charge very slowly (but iPad indicates not charging). Make sure your computer is on while charging iPad via USB. If iPad is connected to a computer that’s turned off or is in sleep or standby mode, the iPad battery will continue to drain.
    Apple recommends that once a month you let the iPad fully discharge & then recharge to 100%.
    How to Calibrate Your Mac, iPhone, or iPad Battery
    http://www.macblend.com/how-to-calibrate-your-mac-iphone-or-ipad-battery/
    At this link http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/galaxy-tab-android-tablet,3014-11.html , tests show that the iPad 2 battery (25 watt-hours) will charge to 90% in 3 hours 1 minute. It will charge to 100% in 4 hours 2 minutes. The new iPad has a larger capacity battery (42 watt-hours), so using the 10W charger will obviously take longer. If you are using your iPad while charging, it will take even longer. It's best to turn your new iPad OFF and charge over night. Also look at The iPad's charging challenge explained http://www.macworld.com/article/1150356/ipadcharging.html
    Also, if you have a 3rd generation iPad, look at
    Apple: iPad Battery Nothing to Get Charged Up About
    http://allthingsd.com/20120327/apple-ipad-battery-nothing-to-get-charged-up-abou t/
    Apple Explains New iPad's Continued Charging Beyond 100% Battery Level
    http://www.macrumors.com/2012/03/27/apple-explains-new-ipads-continued-charging- beyond-100-battery-level/
    New iPad Takes Much Longer to Charge Than iPad 2
    http://www.iphonehacks.com/2012/03/new-ipad-takes-much-longer-to-charge-than-ipa d-2.html
    Apple Batteries - iPad http://www.apple.com/batteries/ipad.html
    Extend iPad Battery Life (Look at pjl123 comment)
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3921324?tstart=30
    New iPad Slow to Recharge, Barely Charges During Use
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/252326/new_ipad_slow_to_recharge_barely_charges_d uring_use.html
    Tips About Charging for New iPad 3
    http://goodscool-electronics.blogspot.com/2012/04/tips-about-charging-for-new-ip ad-3.html
    How to Save and Prolong the battery life of your new ipad
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4480944?tstart=0
    Prolong battery lifespan for iPad / iPad 2 / iPad 3: charging tips
    http://thehowto.wikidot.com/prolong-battery-lifespan-for-ipad
    iPhone, iPod, Using the iPad Charger
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4327
    Install and use Battery Doctor HD
    http://itunes.apple.com/tw/app/battery-doctor-hd/id459702901?mt=8
    To Extend a Device’s Battery Life, Get to Know It Better
    http://tinyurl.com/b67c7xz
    iPad Battery Replacement
    http://www.apple.com/batteries/replacements.html
    In rare instances when using the Camera Connection Kit, you may notice that iPad does not charge after using the Camera Connection Kit. Disconnecting and reconnecting the iPad from the charger will resolve this issue.
     Cheers, Tom

  • Ftp.belnet.be mirror very slow with updates

    The mirror that is closest to my location, ftp.belnet.be , seems to be very slow with updates for AL.
    XFCE4 was updated to 4.2.3 around nov 10 on archlinux.org.
    11 days later xfce4 4.2.2 is still on belnet , and not replaced by the new version.
    Since it's also a fast and reliable server, i don't mind waiting a few days, but more than a week is TOO long.
    What's the use of a bleeding edge distribution when you can't get updates that have been available for more than a week ?
    For now, i have fallen back on archlinux.org , but will look for another european server.

    In contrast with the name, that server doesn't seem to have ANY arch packages anymore.
    :: Synchronizing package databases...
    --00:34:46--  ftp://ftp.archlinux.de/pub/archlinux/cu … .db.tar.gz
               => `current.db.tar.gz.part'
    Resolving ftp.archlinux.de... 134.109.132.98
    Connecting to ftp.archlinux.de|134.109.132.98|:21... connected.
    Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
    ==> SYST ... done.    ==> PWD ... done.
    ==> TYPE I ... done.  ==> CWD /pub/archlinux/current/os/i686 ...
    No such directory `pub/archlinux/current/os/i686'.
    failed to synchronize current
    --00:34:47--  ftp://ftp.archlinux.de/pub/archlinux/ex … .db.tar.gz
               => `extra.db.tar.gz.part'
    Resolving ftp.archlinux.de... 134.109.132.98
    Connecting to ftp.archlinux.de|134.109.132.98|:21... connected.
    Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
    ==> SYST ... done.    ==> PWD ... done.
    ==> TYPE I ... done.  ==> CWD /pub/archlinux/extra/os/i686 ...
    No such directory `pub/archlinux/extra/os/i686'.
    failed to synchronize extra
    searching the site from the www page for pacman gave many results, but none of them were for AL's pacman.

Maybe you are looking for