Null value in Composite Primary key

Hi,
I have a requirement where I need to identify each record based on 4 columns. I though that I could achieve the same by imposing a composite primary key based on all the 4 columns. But any one of the column can be null at anytime. Can I still impose a composite primary key? i.e., if I create a composite primary key based on 4 columns, can any one of the column be null?
Your help would be more appreciated.

No, you can't
By definition a Primary Key is NOT NULL
SQL> drop table t
  2  /
Table dropped.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
SQL>
SQL> create table t
  2  (col1 number null
  3  ,col2 number null
  4  ,col3 number null
  5  ,col4 number null
  6  ,constraint tpk primary key (col1, col2, col3, col4)
  7  )
  8  /
Table created.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
SQL>
SQL> desc t
Name                                                              Null?    Type
COL1                                                              NOT NULL NUMBER
COL2                                                              NOT NULL NUMBER
COL3                                                              NOT NULL NUMBER
COL4                                                              NOT NULL NUMBER
SQL>

Similar Messages

  • Null Field in Composite Primary Key

    Can you have a column be part of a primary key and be nullable?
    I have a table of three fields and I want them all to be part of a primary key, because I need all three columns to reference a unique row. However, one of the fields references a field in another table which can be null. Is there anyway I can achieve this?

    Any columns included in the primary key will be converted to not NULLable as necessary, so, no, you cannot have a NULLable column as part of a primary key.
    You can, however, create a unique constraint that includes a NULLable column as part of the composite key.

  • In which case composite primary key allows NULL values in it

    Hi to all
    In what case composite primary key allows nulls in it.
    Let us suppose, I created a composite primary key with 2 attributes.
    CREATE TABLE sample
    BNK_Id NUMBER(6),
    BNK_Name VARCHAR2(20),
    CONSTRAINT BNK_Id_Name_PK PRIMARY KEY(BNK_Id,BNK_Name)
    When it allows null values in it.
    thanks in advance

    Are you sure that your instructor was not talking about unique keys? As Solomon said, a primary key always implies not null on all of the columns of the PK. However a unique key does not automatically imply not null, and can have nulls in a column as long as the values in the populated columns are unique.
    SQL> create table test (
      2     id number,
      3     pid number,
      4     descr varchar2(10));
    Table created.
    SQL> alter table test add constraint test_unq
      2     unique (id, pid);
    Table altered.
    SQL> insert into test values (1, null, 'desc1');
    1 row created.
    SQL> insert into test values (2, null, 'desc2');
    1 row created.
    SQL> insert into test values (2, null, 'fail1');
    insert into test values (2, null, 'fail1')
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00001: unique constraint (OPS$ORACLE.TEST_UNQ) violatedJohn

  • Null in Composite Primary Key and "Primary keys must not contain null"

    Hello all.
    I'm a newbie concerning to JPA/EJB3, but I was wondering if toplinks doesn't support composite primary keys with null in some field (something perfectly right in any RDBMS).
    I used JDeveloper (I'm using Oracle 10g database and JDeveloper 10.1.3.2.) wizards to generate JPA classes and I checked out generated files (with annotations), so they should be right (by the way, other O-R mappings for my model are working right, but this one).
    I'm getting the next error:
    Exception Description: The primary key read from the row [DatabaseRecord(
         TSUBGRUPOSLDI.CD_GRUP => 01
         TSUBGRUPOSLDI.CD_SUBGRUP => null
         TSUBGRUPOSLDI.CG_POBL => 058
         TSUBGRUPOSLDI.CG_PROV => 28
         TSUBGRUPOSLDI.DSCR => Sanidad)] during the execution of the query was detected to be null. Primary keys must not contain null.
    Compound primary key is (CD_GRUP, CD_SUBGRUP). No foreign keys, no joins (only a NamedQuery: "select o from ..."). It's the simplest case!
    I checked out that everything runs ok if there's no "null" value in CD_SUBGRUP.
    After some research (this and other forums) I'm beginning to believe that it's not supported, but not sure.
    Am I doing sth wrong? If not, what is the reason to not support this? Will it be supported in the future?
    Thanks in advance.

    Null is a special value and in many databases is not comparable to another null value (hence the isNull operator) and may pose problems when used to uniquely identify an Entity. TopLink does not support null values within a composite PK. As the nullable column is most likely not designated as a PK within your database table (many databases do not allow this) I recommend updating the Entity PKs to match that of the database.
    --Gordon                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

  • Can a composite primary key column be null

    Hi All,
    It will be a silly question but still I would like to ask can a composite primary key column be null?
    Thanks,
    Rafi.

    Rafi,
    Why you think it would be allowed?
    SQL> drop table test purge;
    drop table test purge
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
    SQL> create table test as select * from dba_objects;
    Table created.
    SQL> alter table test add primary key(object_id, owner);
    Table altered.
    SQL> insert into test(object_id, owner) values(null, 'aman');
    insert into test(object_id, owner) values(null, 'aman')
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("SYS"."TEST"."OBJECT_ID")
    SQL> insert into test(object_id, owner) values(1,null);
    insert into test(object_id, owner) values(1,null)
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("SYS"."TEST"."OWNER")
    SQL>HTH
    Aman....

  • How to persist an entity with Composite primary key

    Problem Statement:-
    Entity A have many to one relation with Entity C
    Entity B have many to one relation with Entity C
    Entity C have a composite primary key of (Entity A PK & Entity B PK)
    A --< C
    B --< C
    the entites are automatic generated by Dali tool
    @Entity
    public class C implements Serializable
         @EmbeddedId
         private C.PK pk;
         private int attribute;
         //Code
         @Embeddable
         public static class PK implements Serializable
              public int A_Id;
              public int B_Id;
              //Code
    @Entity
    public class A implements Serializable
         @Id
         private int AId;
         @OneToMany
         private Set<C> C_Collection;
         //Code
    @Entity
    public class B implements Serializable
         @Id
         private int BId;
         @OneToMany
         private Set<C> C_Collection;
         //Code
    i made a session Bean which add a new entity C
    Session
         A a = em.find(A.class, AId);
         B b = em.find(B.class, BId);
         C c = new C();
         C.PK pk = new C.PK();
         pk.AId(a.getID());
         pk.BId(b.getID());
         c.setPk(pk);
         c.setA(a);
         c.setB(b);
         c.setAttribute(12);
         em.persist(c);
    when running this code an exception is raised
    Exception [TOPLINK-4002] (Oracle TopLink Essentials - 2006.8 (Build 060830)): oracle.toplink.essentials.exceptions.DatabaseException
    Internal Exception: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Unknown column 'A_ID' in 'field list'Error Code: 1054
    Call:INSERT INTO C (attribute, Aid, A_ID, B_ID, Bid) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
         bind => [2, 6, 6, 1, 1]
    this is logic as Table "C" has only 3 coloumns only "attribute" , "Aid" , "Bid"
    but the mapping is different as it adds the composite PK attributes to the insert statement
    if there is a sample code or how to solve this issue it would be great

    Hello Juwen,
    The problem is you are registering an object, assigning it a null pk, and then commiting the uow/transaction. TopLink uses registered objects to keep track of changes you make inorder to persist those changes on commit. So the simple fix is to not commit the UnitOfWork - call release() on it instead.
    Another solution is to use the session copyObject api. The simple form that only takes an object will work similar to registering the object as it will copy all persistent attributes but it will leave the primary key null. You can also use this method to specify a copyPolicy to customize the process. Using this method will be a bit more efficient, since a UOW makes both a working copy and a back up copy of objects registered, inorder to keep track of changes. Using the copyObject api will only make a single copy.
    Best Regards,
    Chris

  • How to Work with Composite Primary Key

    Hi All,
    I'm working with Toplink JPA. Here I have A problem with inserting into database table which have composite Primary Key.
    What I'm doing is, I have two tables. to maintain many to many relation between these two tables I created another intermediate table which consists of foreign Keys (reference) of above two tables.
    Now these two foreign Keys in the Intermediate table made as composite Primary Keys.
    When I'm trying to the data in the Intermediate table I'm getting the foreign Keys values are null..
    could anyone suggest me how to work with composite Primary Keys
    Thanks,
    Satish

    I have the same problem, I have 3 tables with a join table joining them all. I have created an intermediate table entity. When I go to create a an entry, it says that I cannot enter null into "ID". Here is the SQl toplink generates:
    INSERT INTO Z_AUTH_USER_AUTHORIZATION (CONTEXT_ID, AUTHORIZATION_ID, USER_ID) VALUES (?, ?, ?)
    bind => [null, null, null]
    Here are the classes:
    -----------------------Join Table-----------------------------------------------
    @Entity()
    @Table(name = "Z_AUTH_USER_AUTHORIZATION")
    public class AuthUserAuthorization implements Serializable{
    @EmbeddedId
    private AuthUserAuthorizationPK compId;
    // bi-directional many-to-one association to AuthAuthorization
    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
    @JoinColumn(name = "AUTHORIZATION_ID", referencedColumnName = "ID", nullable = false, insertable = false, updatable = false)
    private AuthAuthorization authAuthorization;
    // bi-directional many-to-one association to AuthContext
    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
    @JoinColumn(name = "CONTEXT_ID", referencedColumnName = "ID", nullable = false, insertable = false, updatable = false)
    private AuthContext authContext;
    // bi-directional many-to-one association to AuthUser
    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
    @JoinColumn(name = "USER_ID", referencedColumnName = "ID", nullable = false, insertable = false, updatable = false)
    private AuthUser authUser;
    ---------------------------------------User table--------------------------------------------------------------
    @Entity()
    @Table(name = "Z_AUTH_USER")
    public class AuthUser implements Serializable, IUser{
    @Id()
    @SequenceGenerator(name = "AUTH_USER_ID_SEQ", sequenceName = "Z_AUTH_USER_ID_SEQ")
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "AUTH_USER_ID_SEQ")
    @Column(name = "ID", unique = true, nullable = false, precision = 10)
    private Integer id;
    // bi-directional many-to-one association to AuthUserAuthorization
    @OneToMany(mappedBy = "authUser", fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
    private java.util.Set<AuthUserAuthorization> authUserAuthorizations;
    -----------------------------------Context table-----------------------------------------------------------------
    @Entity()
    @Table(name = "Z_AUTH_CONTEXT")
    public class AuthContext implements Serializable, IContext{
    @Id()
    @SequenceGenerator(name = "AUTH_CONTEXT_ID_SEQ", sequenceName = "Z_AUTH_CONTEXT_ID_SEQ")
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "AUTH_CONTEXT_ID_SEQ")
    @Column(name = "ID", unique = true, nullable = false, precision = 8)
    private Integer id;
    // bi-directional many-to-one association to AuthUserAuthorization
    @OneToMany(mappedBy = "authContext", fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
    private java.util.Set<AuthUserAuthorization> authUserAuthorizations;
    ----------------------------Authorization table-------------------------------------------------
    @Entity()
    @Table(name = "Z_AUTH_AUTHORIZATION")
    public class AuthAuthorization implements Serializable, IAuthorization{
    @Id()
    @SequenceGenerator(name = "AUTH_AUTHORIZATION_ID_SEQ", sequenceName = "Z_AUTH_AUTHORIZATION_ID_SEQ")
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "AUTH_AUTHORIZATION_ID_SEQ")
    @Column(name = "ID", unique = true, nullable = false, precision = 8)
    private Integer id;
    // bi-directional many-to-one association to AuthUserAuthorization
    @OneToMany(mappedBy = "authAuthorization", fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
    private java.util.Set<AuthUserAuthorization> authUserAuthorizations;
    I have tried to create the new entity several ways. I have tried to create one with the default constructor then set this entity on each of the other entities, I have also tried to pass in the entities to the join entity and set them there, but this doesn't work. Any help would be very appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Bill

  • Update enrolled table which has 6 composite primary key

    Hi Everyone,
    I am trying to update a grade column in table called enrolled which has 6 composite primary key column including SID, TERMYEAR, FACCODE, DEPCODE, COURSENO, SECNO and 2 extra column including GRADE, IDD all of them are of type VARCHAR2 as describe below:
    To update this table I used the command below:
    UPDATE enrolled
    SET grade = :COURSE_BLOCK.GRADE_TEXT
    WHERE IID = :GLOBAL.logUserid
    AND SID = :COURSE_BLOCK.SID_TEXT
    AND FACCODE = :COURSE_BLOCK.FACULTY_TEXT
    AND DEPCODE = :COURSE_BLOCK.DEPARTMENT_TEXT
    AND COURSENO = :COURSE_BLOCK.COURSE_TEXT
    AND SECNO = :COURSE_BLOCK.SECTION_TEXT;
    Note: the :GLOBAL.logUserid is a global variable that I assigned the user id when the user log on to the application.
    When I run the application and fill out the form in order to update the table this doesn't update the table and if I use SQL*PLUS as well with the values that I use for the form to update the table I get message: o rows updated
    Can Someone help please?

    Here is the solution.
    The problem:
    The problem was that the enrolled table was designed in a way that a student can enrolled in the lecture(LEC type column) and Laboratory(LAB type column). When a student is given a grade, it is given a grade for the course 100 (eg: 03-60-100) this course has a lecture and lab. this course belong to the faculty code 03(science) department 60 (computer Science) so when a student register to a course, will register to a lecture and a lab but he will receive a grade for the course 100 lec in this case Oracle couldn't update the table because there was two column with course 100 for that particular student Id
    The solution:
    There are many solution I believe but my quickest solution is when a student register to the course by default is given a grade 'I' means Incomplete then when the instructor add the grade, he can just update a grade from incomplete to the final grade (eg A) now the code will be to get only the course 100 that has grade and discard that doesn't have grade this means that I need only to make sure that the WHERE Clause grade is not null shown below.
    UPDATE enrolled
    SET grade = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD_NAME
    WHERE grade IS NOY NULL
    AND IID = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD
    AND faccode = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD
    AND depcode = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD
    AND courseno= BLOCK_NAME.FIELD_NAME
    NAD secno = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD_NAME
    AND SID = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD_NAME

  • Error While Deploying A CMP Entity Bean With A Composite Primary Key

    Hello all,
    I have a problem deploying CMP Entity beans with composite primary keys. I have a CMP Entity Bean, which contains a composite primary key composed of two local stubs. If you know more about this please respond to my post on the EJB forum (subject: CMP Bean Local Stub as a Field of a Primary Key Class).
    In the mean time, can you please tell me what following error message means and how to resolve it? From what I understand it might be a problem with Sun ONE AS 7, but I would like to make sure it's not me doing something wrong.
    [05/Jan/2005:12:49:03] WARNING ( 1896):      Validation error in bean CustomerSubscription: The type of non-static field customer of the key class
    test.subscription.CustomerSubscriptionCMP_1530383317_JDOState$Oid must be primitive or must implement java.io.Serializable.
         Update the type of the key class field.
         Warning: All primary key columns in primary table CustomerSubscription of the bean corresponding to the generated class test.subscription.CustomerSubscriptionCMP_1530383317_JDOState must be mapped to key fields.
         Map the following primary key columns to key fields: CustomerSubscription.CustomerEmail,CustomerSubscription.SubscriptionType. If you already have fields mapped to these columns, verify that they are key fields.Is it enough that a primary key class be serializable or all fields have to implement Serializable or be a primitive?
    Please let me know if you need more information to answer my question.
    Thanks.
    Nikola

    Hi Nikola,
    There are several problems with your CMP bean.
    1. Fields of a Primary Key Class must be a subset of CMP fields, so yes, they must be either a primitive or a Serializable type.
    2. Sun Application Server does not support Primary Key fields of an arbitrary Serializable type (i.e. those that will be stored
    as BLOB in the database), but only primitives, Java wrappers, String, and Date/Time types.
    Do you try to use stubs instead of relationships or for some other reason?
    If it's the former - look at the CMR fields.
    If it's the latter, I suggest to store these fields as regular CMP fields and use some other value as the PK. If you prefer that
    the CMP container generates the PK values, use the Unknown
    PrimaryKey feature.
    Regards,
    -marina

  • Composite Primary Key Error

    I am using Sun One App Server PE8.
    I have a class with a composite primary key field. When I place the following method in my Home interface:
    public MyEjb findByPrimaryKey(MyEjbPrimaryKey pk) throws FinderException, RemoteException;I get the following error when deploying:
    ejbFindByPrimaryKey(EjbPrimaryKey) is already defined in MyEjb1368202910_ConcreteImpl
        public MyEjbPrimaryKey ejbFindByPrimaryKey (MyEjbPrimaryKey key)However, If i remove this method from the Home interface, i get the following error when running the verification tool:
    Error: No single arg findByPrimaryKey(PrimaryKeyClass) method was found in home interface class [ MyEjb ].However, I can still deploy the EAR successfully.
    Another related symptom of this problem, is if I include the following method in my Home interface:
    public MyEjb findByPrimaryKey(String pkField1, String pkField2) throws FinderException, RemoteException;And call this method, I get the following exception at runtime:
    java.rmi.RemoteException: Bean class for ejb [MyEjb] does not define a method corresponding to [Home] interface method [public abstract MyEjb MyEjbHome.findByPrimaryKey(java.lang.String,java
    .lang.String) throws javax.ejb.FinderException,java.rmi.RemoteException]I get these same problems with all EJB's that use composite keys. Has anyone else had this problem?
    Thanks
    toby

    This is a CMP bean, with no ejbFindByPrimaryKey in the Bean class. Below, i have included the Home interface and the Bean class (with unneccessary code removed)
    Thanks for looking at this for me.
    BEAN CLASS
    package lands.mc.bus.prod;
    import java.rmi.*;
    import java.util.*;
    import javax.ejb.*;
    public abstract class TopoMapBean implements EntityBean
      private EntityContext entity;
      public TopoMapBean()
      public void setEntityContext(EntityContext ctx)
        entity = ctx;
      public void unsetEntityContext()
        entity = null;
      public TopoMapPrimaryKey ejbCreate(String mapName, String mapNumber, String mnemonic,String edition, String scale)
      throws CreateException
        // call setters...
        return null;
      public void ejbPostCreate( String mapName,
                                                   String mapNumber,
                                             String mnemonic,
                                             String edition,
                                             String scale )
      removed set/get methods
      public void ejbStore() {}
      public void ejbLoad() {}
      public void ejbActivate() {}
      public void ejbPassivate() {}
      public void ejbRemove() {}
    }HOME INTERFACE
    package lands.mc.bus.prod;
    import java.rmi.*;
    import java.util.*;
    import javax.ejb.*;
    public interface TopoMapHome extends EJBHome
      public TopoMap create(String mapName,
                            String mapNumber,
                            String mnemonic,
                            String edition,
                            String scale
      throws CreateException, RemoteException;
      public TopoMap findByPrimaryKey(String mapNumber, String edition) throws FinderException, RemoteException;
    // doesnt deploy with this signature
    //  public TopoMap findByPrimaryKey(TopoMapPrimaryKey pkey) throws FinderException;
    // have to use this method instead of findByPrimaryKey(String, String) above
      public TopoMap findTopoMap(String mapNumber, String edition) throws FinderException, RemoteException;

  • Querying on the basis of some attribute of composite primary key

    Hello,
    I am looking for suggestion about querying just on the basis of one attribute of the composite primary key.
    TO exemplify,
    I have a 6 attributes example A1,A2,A3,A4,A5,A6.
    A1,A2 and A3 together, serve as composite primary key.Now,because of the need of the project,I want to do querying on the basis of any A1,A2 or A3.One way I could think of is to have secondary indices on each of A1,A2,A3.
    Can some one explain me roughly how to go about it?
    I am a new user of BerkeleyDB Java Edition,hence not sure what would be a good way to do it.I understand one way to do it,would be to keep A1,A2,A3 in the Key class and A1,A2,A3,A4,A5,A6 in the value class as well.Then create secondary indices on the A1,A2 and A3 individually.
    Can someone suggest a more efficient way?
    Thanks,
    Will appreciate any suggestions.
    Prateek

    Exactly as you said. Create secondary indices on each attribute you want to index off of. I don't use the Java interface, but what you pretty much need to do is form your secondary key like so:
    skey: pkey_individual_attribute
    skeysize: pkey_individual_attribute_sizeHow to do this is documented in the BDB Java API docs:
    For example:
        class MyKeyCreator implements SecondaryKeyCreator {
            public boolean createSecondaryKey(SecondaryDatabase secondary,
                                                DatabaseEntry key,
                                                DatabaseEntry data,
                                                DatabaseEntry result)
                throws DatabaseException {
                // DO HERE: Extract the secondary key from the primary key and
                // data, and set the secondary key into the result parameter.
                return true;
        SecondaryConfig secConfig = new SecondaryConfig();
        secConfig.setKeyCreator(new MyKeyCreator());
        // Now pass secConfig to Environment.openSecondaryDatabaseThe extractor function used to construct the secondary index is passed the primary key and primary data - therefore all the data is available to you with no need to duplicate the key within the data itself. While the standard example is to use some part of the primary data to form a secondary key - there's absolutely nothing against using only a part of the primary key to form a secondary key instead. The only thing you have to do is slice up said primary key and construct the "result" parameter to be a single attribute. The backend API already knows which composite key this secondary entry will be associated with and as such will implicitly form the data (or as you called it "value") section of the index (which will be the composite primary key passed to it).
    The primary key/data should consist of the composite A1,A2,A3 with only A4,A5,A6 as data.
    The secondary->get() call (within the Java API) takes a key and provides back the primary key and primary data (basically the same as the db->pget() call in the C API). Since you've already indexed individual attributes, based off of the composite key, into their own respective databases - you just query from one of your secondary indexes with whatever specific attribute as the key. You then use the filled in primary key and primary data to work off of.

  • Master Detail Forms with 2 composite primary keys - Is there a workaround?

    Hello All,
    I have been searching for a workaround to the maximum 2 part primary key restriction on the multi-row updates, and master-detail forms, and am hoping that someone can help me. I am using HTMLDB v2.0.0.00.49 with IE 6 against a 9.2 DB.
    I successfully implemented the workaround of Fred Stoopendaal's (see Updata PK on HTML DB ) and it works fine for single page multi-record updateable forms, but alas I haven't been able to extend it to master detail forms (I think it is something to do with Oracle not allowing the "returning" clause on views).
    Here is what I tried:
    two tables, one with a 2 part composite primary key, which is the master table, and a detail table with 3 part composite primary key -
    --------- BEGIN SQL ---------
    create table master_table
    ( master_col1 number
    , master_col2 number
    , master_col3 varchar2(30)
    , constraint master_pk primary key (master_col1,master_col2));
    create table detail_table
    (detail_col1 number
    ,detail_col2 number
    ,detail_col3 number
    ,detail_col4 varchar2(30)
    , constraint detail_pk primary key(detail_col1,detail_col2,detail_col3)
    , constraint master_detail_fk foreign key (detail_col1,detail_col2) references master_table(master_col1,master_col2));
    create or replace view v_master_table as
    select rowid mata_rowid,mata.*
    from master_table mata;
    create or replace view v_detail_table as
    select rowid deta_rowid,
    (select rowid from master_table mata where mata.master_col1 = deta.detail_col1 and mata.master_col2 = deta.detail_col2) deta_mata_rowid
    , deta.*
    from detail_table deta;
    create or replace trigger mata_ins_upd_trg
    instead of insert or update on v_master_table
    referencing new as new old as old
    for each row
    begin
    if inserting then
    insert into master_table (master_col1, master_col2, master_col3)
    values (:new.master_col1, :new.master_col2, :new.master_col3);
    end if;
    if updating then
    update master_table
    set master_col1 = :new.master_col1,
    master_col2 = :new.master_col2,
    master_col3 = :new.master_col3
    where rowid = :old.mata_rowid;
    end if;
    end;
    create or replace trigger deta_ins_upd_trg
    instead of insert or update on v_detail_table
    referencing new as new old as old
    for each row
    begin
    if inserting then
    insert into detail_table ( detail_col1, detail_col2, detail_col3, detail_col4)
    values (:new.detail_col1, :new.detail_col2, :new.detail_col3, :new.detail_col4);
    end if;
    if updating then
    update detail_table
    set detail_col1 = :new.detail_col1,
    detail_col2 = :new.detail_col2,
    detail_col3 = :new.detail_col3,
    detail_col4 = :new.detail_col4
    where rowid = :old.deta_rowid;
    end if;
    end;
    --------- END SQL ---------
    Then I created a master-detail form in Apex on the two views, using the mata_rowid and deta_rowid as primary keys, and mata_rowid=deta_mata_rowid as the link. I realise that using a function to fetch the master rowid within the detail view query is costly, but it was my intention to modify the record fetch queries to use the real FK columns once things were up and running.
    It seems to generate the pages ok, and I can insert/update master table records, but as soon as I modify records in the detail table things go a bit haywire. I can't find any documentation on how the inbuilt MRU/MRD logic works, so can't figure out the issue.
    Can anyone out there tell me what the problem is with the logic above, or if they have come up with a neat solution to this annoying limitation. I know that many will say that I should modify the data model to use surrogate primary keys, but many of the uses for HTMLDB are new interfaces for old schemas, so a workaround that doesn't involve wholesale data model changes would be preferable.
    Thanks in advance,
    Mike Cretan

    Hi, this is likely not the most elegant way...but perhaps the simplest -- and I didn't have much time to play.
    I used Wizard to create two separate Master Detail forms, each with a separate detail table. Thus I ended up with four pages:
    Page "A" - "Selector" page for Master (Report), with Edit link driving to Detail-1
    Page "B" - Editable Master/Detail-1 page (HTML / Report)
    Page "C" - "Selector" page for Master (Report), with Edit link driving to Detail-2
    Page "D" - Editable Master/Detail-2 page (HTML / Report)
    Then I selected the primary key column TWICE on the Report on Page A. Modified the second instance of this column to navigate to Page D (passing primary key) exactly the way the original instance of this column navigates to Page B. Then I deleted Page C.
    Since you can have only one Tabular Entry form per page, this seemed the best way to drive two separate detail tables from a common interface.

  • Urgent - ESB: DB Adapter with composite primary keys no returning any data

    I have a DB Adapter in the ESB that inserts/updates/selects data to/from a table with 2 columns as primary keys, but table has several columns.
    1. Initially, the db table had constraints for the composite primary key, The DB adapter had valid data coming in, but no result data.
    2. Then I removed the db constraints on the composite primary key, and selected the 2 columns in the DB adapter wizard. Still, valid data is going in, since I am outputing to a file prior to call this node, but no result data is appearing. The result XML is empty.
    Do I need to do something in Toplink for this?
    The table spec is below. the ACCT_FIELD and ACCT_CODE columns make up the composite primary key.
    CREATE TABLE AFF_DATA_SYNC
    ACCT_FIELD NUMBER NOT NULL,
    ACCT_CODE VARCHAR2(16) NOT NULL,
    ACCT_EXISTS_FLAG VARCHAR2(1),
    SAVE_ACCT_SEG_XML CLOB,
    LAST_UPDATE_DATE DATE
    The following xml is the request to the DB adapter:
    <top:AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_accountField_accountCodeInputParameters xmlns:top="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/top/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter">
    <top:accountField>8</top:accountField>
    <top:accountCode>0003888</top:accountCode>
    </top:AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_accountField_accountCodeInputParameters>
    Log output:
    JCA: esb:///ESB_Projects/STRIPES-AFF-Data-Intg_AFF-Data-Integration/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.wsdl [ AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter_ptt::AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_accountField_accountCode(AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_accountField_accountCode_inparameters,Af
    DataSyncWipCollection) ] - No XMLRecord headers provided
    JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Executing query with arguments [8, 0003917]
    JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.TopLinkLogger log> SELECT ACCT_FIELD, ACCT_CODE, ACCT_EXISTS_FLAG, SAVE_ACCT_SEG_XML, LAST_UPDATE_DATE FROM
    AFF_DATA_SYNC_WIP WHERE ((ACCT_FIELD = ?) AND (ACCT_CODE = ?))
    bind => [8, 0003888]
    JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Read the following objects: []
    Message was edited by:
    user589357
    Message was edited by:
    user589357
    Message was edited by:
    user589357
    Message was edited by:
    user589357

    The Toplink has no errors. Now I changed my table with only a single primary key, but for some reason, I am still getting no data.
    JDeveloper 10.1.3.3 / SOA Suite (only using ESB) 10.1.3.3 with Oracle DB 10g 10.2.0.3.
    1. What does No XMLRecord headers found mean?
    2. Notice the last log item; Read ... []
    Here are the log contents:
    Invoking next service "AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId" with payload :
    <top:AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordIdInputParameters xmlns:top="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/top/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter">
    <top:recordId>80003888</top:recordId>
    </top:AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordIdInputParameters>
    JCA: esb:///ESB_Projects/STRIPES-AFF-Data-Intg_AFF-Data-Integration/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.wsdl [ AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter_ptt::AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId(AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId_inparameters,AffDataSyncWipCollection)
    ] - No XMLRecord headers provided
    JCA: esb:///ESB_Projects/STRIPES-AFF-Data-Intg_AFF-Data-Integration/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.wsdl [ AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter_ptt::AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId(AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId_inparameters,AffDataSyncWipCollection)
    ] - Starting JCA LocalTransaction
    JCA: esb:///ESB_Projects/STRIPES-AFF-Data-Intg_AFF-Data-Integration/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.wsdl [ AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter_ptt::AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId(AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId_inparameters,AffDataSyncWipCollection)
    ] - Invoking JCA Outbound Interaction
    JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> executing the NamedQuery: AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.AffDataSyncWip.AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect
    JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Parsing header record element.
    JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.TopLinkLogger log> client acquired
    JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Executing query with arguments [80003888]
    JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.TopLinkLogger log> SELECT RECORD_ID, ACCT_FIELD, ACCT_CODE, ACCT_EXISTS_FLAG, SAVE_ACCT_SEG_XML, LAST_UPDATE_DATE
    FROM AFF_DATA_SYNC_WIP WHERE (RECORD_ID = ?)
    bind => [80003888]
    JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Read the following objects: []
    Message was edited by:
    user589357
    Message was edited by:
    user589357

  • Composite primary key and InputSelect

    Hi
    I have a jsp page where I have an InputSelect list that display the on of the field of a composite primary key.
    What I what is to pass the second field of the primary key to my submit page without letting the user see that field.
    <tr>
    <td>Projekt</td>
    <td>
    <jbo:InputSelect multiple="false"
    datasource="ds"
    dataitem="ProjektId"
    displaydatasource="proid"
    displaydataitem="ProjektId"
    displayvaluedataitem="ProjektId" />
    </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
    <td></td>
    <td>
    <jbo:InputHidden datasource="ds"
    dataitem="Kundenr" ></jbo:InputHidden>
    </td>
    </tr>
    How can I automaticly give this hidden field it's value.
    With kind regards Arnar Dagsson

    How to implement this?
    A has one to many relation ship with B
    TABLE A
    key A1 (primary key)
    data A2
    data A3
    fkey B2 --> @OneToManyShouldn't this be (it is composite):
    TABLE A
    key A1 (primary key)
    data A2
    data A3
    fkey B1 --> @OneToMany
    fkey B2 --> @OneToMany
    >
    TABLE B
    key B1 (primary)
    key B2 (primary) <--- @ManyToOne
    data B3
    Tried to use @OneToMany and @ManyToOne but complains
    about
    @JoinColumns etc. Is this possible at all?If you can avoid having composite primary keys
    Take a look at this message for my answer
    http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=764754&messageID=4366595#4366595
    Hope it helps

  • Composite Primary key & Primary key questions

    Background:
    1.5 TB data warehouse. All tables use at least a 3 column composite Primary key. Most use 3. col1||col2||col3 to achieve uniqueness.
    col1= very low cardinality. 99% of the values are '0'
    col2 = high cardinality. (SSN's, loaded monthly)
    col3 = low cardinality. (monthly sequence number used for partitioning)
    From what I've read, the first column used in a composite primary key also receives its own index. If that is correct, then the primary key being used is losing its effectiveness by putting a very low cardinality column as the first column of the Primary key. By moving col2 to the first position of the composite key, I would be obtaining an index on SSN which would be much more useful. (Please correct me if I'm wrong) Or since the index would be so large anyway, the CBO would just do full table scans which is what I'm trying to get away from.
    This Primary key is used to ensure uniqueness during loads. Other than that, it really has no purpose and is never queried by the user. (WHERE col1||col2||col3 = xxxxxxxxx)
    As a DBA, I see this massive tablespace for holding the primary keys now reaching in excess of 157 GB and it seems like such a waste of space. The problem I'm running across is how to ensure uniqueness during the loads w/o having to store the unique values. (the 157 GB) If I drop the PK's, then create unique indexes just for the loads, then the unique index would be generated against the entire table, which would take forever.
    If you create a local index (what I want in the end) it still has to create the index for all previous partitions (250+ partitions). You can't create a specific 'local' index on a partition. You create a local index on the table and when a new partition is added, the index is then added as well. That's what I want to do with some of my fields like SSN but for loading purposes, this isn't going to help me.
    I need a way to ensure uniqueness during a monthly load of a new partition (col1||col2||col3) but w/o having to store these values for eternity. Right now it's the primary key, so it has to be stored. I hope I'm making sense here. Any ideas?

    I think you need some clarification about the index supporting the primary key.
    The primary key is unique - the database will enforce this for you.
    All of the columns in the primary key are in the index that enforces the key (not just the first column).
    Usually this index is a unique index, but you can have a non-unique index supporting a primary key.
    I'm a little confused with some of your other statements
    how to ensure uniqueness during the loads w/o having to store the unique valuesIf you don't store the value how do you know it is unique?
    Did you mean that you don't want to store the key values in both the table and the index?
    You may want to consider making col3 (the partition key) the leading column of the index, so you can create a local (instead of global) PK index.
    I wouldn't worry too much about col1 (the column full of mostly zeros) - numbers are stored variable length. A NUMBER(38) that holds a zero takes no more space than a NUMBER(1) that holds a zero.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can I use my jetpack as a modem for another company?

    I have internet through another company. Can I use the Jetpack as a modem for the other company? I don't want to have to buy any other equipment!!

  • How to best downsize my portfolio catalog?

    I've got 130,000 RAW images in my personal and professional portfolio, now spreading onto more than one 3TB drive and becoming a hassle to work with and back up.  As I continue to make new and further purge my old collection, I wonder if I can export

  • Not to Update custom infotype

    Hi Expert, I have one custom FM which is used to update the custom infotype but my requirement is when it get fail it should not update the infotype but it is updating.Befor this FM we are performing operation i. e MASSN  07,08, . This requirement is

  • Can't sync purchased songs

    After iTunes upgraded, I cannot sync any purchased music to my iPhone. All the purchased music that was on my iPhone was deleted. How can I fix this? All the music shows up in iTunes.

  • (HELP) Dead MacBook Pro.. possibly something to do with the logic board.

    I had been noticing my MacBook Pro's performance degrading lately.. for example whenever I dragged a file into a folder it would lag for 5-6 seconds and then copy over. It started to bug me so I guessed that maybe a reinstall would fix the problem. A