Number precision too large

THE FOLLOWING SIMPLE CODE IS GIVING ERROR even though i have given the definition (2,3) which is larger than the length of value 3.14 ?
declare
pi constant number(2,3):=3.14;
r number(5) ;
a number(5);
begin
r:=2;
a:=pi*power(r,2);
dbms_output.put_line('area is '||a);
insert into areas values(r,a);
end;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: number precision too large
ORA-06512: at line 2

pi constant number(2,3):=3.14;Perhaps you meant NUMBER(3,2).
SQL> declare
2     pi constant number(3,2):=3.14;
3 begin
4     dbms_output.put_line(pi);
5 end;
6 /
3.14
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> declare
2     pi constant number(3,2):=3.1415926;
3 begin
4     dbms_output.put_line(pi);
5 end;
6 /
3.14

Similar Messages

PL/SQL: numeric or value error: number precision too large

hi ,
i am running my script and getting this error. i created a object and and make table type on this with fraction of number(2,2). and in my script i am calling a standard API which have hour in number only .i am also using a custome table also which also having number(2,2). so plz help me to resoulve thsi error.
description below:
DECLARE
l_Return_Status VARCHAR2 (30):=NULL;
l_Msg_Count NUMBER :=0;
l_Msg_Data VARCHAR2 (2000) := NULL;
v_Sape_Sco_info_Tbl SAPE_SCO_INFO_TBL;
v_Sape_Sco_info_rec SAPE_SCO_INFO_REC;
p_assignment number:=165316; -----165688;
p_project_id number:=74538; -----81993;
sco_id number:=10371;
BEGIN
v_Sape_Sco_info_Tbl := SAPE_SCO_INFO_TBL();
v_Sape_Sco_info_rec := SAPE_SCO_INFO_REC(p_assignment,p_project_id,sco_id,'15-Oct-2009','31-Oct-2009',15.00,'17-Oct-2009','20-Oct-2009','ADD_EXISTING_RESOURCES',02.50,NULL,'Y',NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL);
v_Sape_Sco_info_Tbl.EXTEND;
v_Sape_Sco_info_Tbl(1) := v_Sape_Sco_info_rec;
SAPE_UPDATE_SCO_DETAILS_PKG.SCO_ROLE_INCREASE(
x_project_id =>p_project_id,
x_Assignment_Id =>p_assignment,
l_Sape_Sco_info_Tbl => v_Sape_Sco_info_Tbl,
x_called_function =>'ADD_EXISTING_RESOURCES',
x_Return_Status =>l_Return_Status,
x_Msg_Count =>l_Msg_Count,
x_Msg_Data =>l_Msg_Data
dbms_output.put_line('second Procedure executed sucessesfuly');
dbms_output.put_line('l_Return_Status '||l_Return_Status||' l_Msg_Count '||l_Msg_Count||'l_Msg_Data');
dbms_output.put_line('value'||' '||v_Sape_Sco_info_Tbl(1).Assignment_Id);
dbms_output.put_line('completed');
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
dbms_output.put_line(sqlerrm(sqlcode));
END;
error :PL/SQL: numeric or value error: number precision too large
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE SAPE_PA.SAPE_SCO_INFO_TBL IS TABLE OF SAPE_SCO_INFO_REC;
Prompt OBJECT TYPE SAPE_PA.SAPE_SCO_INFO_REC
DROP TYPE SAPE_PA.SAPE_SCO_INFO_REC;
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE SAPE_PA.SAPE_SCO_INFO_REC AS OBJECT
( Assignment_Id NUMBER,
project_id Number,
sco_id Number,
Role_START_DATE DATE,
Role_END_DATE DATE,
avg_hrs_per_day NUMBER(2,2),
sco_role_start_date DATE,
sco_role_end_date DATE,
sco_role_mode VARCHAR2(250),
sco_hrs_per_day NUMBER(2,2),
no_of_copies Number,
Active_Flag VARCHAR2(10),
BILLABLE_UPSIDE_INDICATIOR VARCHAR2(5),
RET_CODE VARCHAR2(5),
ERROR_MSG VARCHAR2(255),
ATTRIBUTE1 VARCHAR2(240),
ATTRIBUTE2 VARCHAR2(240),
ATTRIBUTE3 VARCHAR2(240),
ATTRIBUTE4 VARCHAR2(240),
NATTRIBUTE1 NUMBER,
NATTRIBUTE2 NUMBER
CREATE TABLE SAPE_PA.SAPE_SCO_STAFFING_MAPPINGS
(     PROJECT_ID NUMBER,
          SCO_ID NUMBER,
          ASSIGNMENT_ID NUMBER PRIMARY KEY,
          SCO_ROLE_START_DATE DATE,
          SCO_ROLE_END_DATE DATE,
          SCO_ROLE_HOURS NUMBER(2,2),
          SCO_MODE VARCHAR2(80),
          ACTIVE_FLAG VARCHAR2(5),
          LAST_UPDATE_DATE DATE,
          LAST_UPDATED_BY NUMBER(15,0),
          CREATION_DATE DATE,
          CREATED_BY NUMBER(15,0),
          LAST_UPDATE_LOGIN NUMBER(15,0),
          ATTRIBUTE1 VARCHAR2(240),
          ATTRIBUTE2 VARCHAR2(240),
          ATTRIBUTE3 VARCHAR2(240),
          ATTRIBUTE4 VARCHAR2(240),
          NATTRIBUTE1 NUMBER,
          NATTRIBUTE2 NUMBER
          )

The problem here is with avg_hrs_per_day NUMBER(2,2)+ of SAPE_SCO_INFO_REC object.
user12226862 wrote:
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE SAPE_PA.SAPE_SCO_INFO_REC AS OBJECT
( Assignment_Id NUMBER,
project_id Number,
sco_id Number,
Role_START_DATE DATE,
Role_END_DATE DATE,
avg_hrs_per_day NUMBER(2,2),
sco_role_start_date DATE,And while assigning the value it is:
user12226862 wrote:
v_Sape_Sco_info_rec := SAPE_SCO_INFO_REC(p_assignment,p_project_id,sco_id,'15-Oct-2009','31-
Oct-2009',15.00,'17-Oct-2009','20-
Oct-2009','ADD_EXISTING_RESOURCES',02.50,NULL,'Y',NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL);Note that number(2,2) means maximum total of digits in that case is 2 (including scale), not 4.
E.g.
SQL> declare
2       x number(2,2);
3     begin
4       x := 02.50;
5     end;
6    /
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: number precision too large
ORA-06512: at line 4However, this works:
SQL> declare
2       x number(2,2);
3     begin
4       x := .50;
5     end;
6    /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.Cheers,
AA

ERROR:number precision too large (WWV-16016)

Hi!
As I try to insert values into form items an error accurs:
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: number precision too
large (WWV-16016)
P.S.-One form item inserts values into database table where
column is VARCHAR2, lenght 2000...
How can I fix this error?Thank you in advance!

Table Structure:
ID NUMBER (5,0) , DATE_T1 DATE, ID_PROFESOR NUMBER(5,0), SUBJECT
VARCHAR2(50), MESSAGE VARCHAR2(2000).
The error accurs for example if I try to insert:
ID=1,DATE_T1=6.6.2001, ID_PROFESOR=3, SUBJECT="New uniforms",
MESSAGE="bla,bla,bla..."
I'm using Oracle portal version 8.1.2.
I hope, this will help you!

ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: number precision too large

I am getting this error when my procedure is being invoked. I've checked if a calculation is attemting to assign an integer to a column that has a smaller data type...e.g 99 being inserted into NUMBER(2)....but this all seems fine...
any ideas where I should check?
thanks!

>Is there a way to tell which column is throwing this error
As suggested by Guido it appears to be related to your variables, not the table;
SQL> create table t (col1 number(1))
Table created.
SQL> begin
   insert into t values (11);
end;
ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allowed for this column
ORA-06512: at line 2
SQL> declare
   n number(1);
   n2 number(2) :=11;
begin
   n:= n2;
end;
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: number precision too large
ORA-06512: at line 5The error message should tell you the line of code that is causing the problem, ie;
ORA-06512: at line 5A quick way to show the values is to display them using dbms_output.put_line inline or in the exception handler.

ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error:. number precision too large, ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error:. number precision too large

I have hit with above error and the code did run successfully before the minor change in the portion I have bolded. Appreciate your comment & help.
Attached with the code:
CREATE TABLE RPT1120B_CHANNEL_new
(SUBSCRIBER_NO NUMBER (9),
FP_CHANNEL VARCHAR2(255),
FP_DATE DATE,
FP_DYNASTY CHAR(1),
FP_MOVIE CHAR(1),
FP_FUN CHAR(1),
FP_LEARNING CHAR(1),
FP_NEWS CHAR(1),
FP_SPORTS CHAR(1),
FP_VARIETY CHAR(1),
FP_EMPEROR CHAR(1),
FP_SX1 CHAR(1),
FP_CEL CHAR(1),
LP_CHANNEL VARCHAR2(255),
LP_DATE DATE,
LP_DYNASTY CHAR(1),
LP_MOVIE CHAR(1),
LP_FUN CHAR(1),
LP_LEARNING CHAR(1),
LP_NEWS CHAR(1),
LP_SPORTS CHAR(1),
LP_VARIETY CHAR(1),
LP_EMPEROR CHAR(1),
LP_SX1 CHAR(1),
LP_CEL CHAR(1));
--truncate table RPT1120B_CHANNEL;
create or replace PROCEDURE sp_rpt1120b_new
AS
FP_CHANNEL VARCHAR2(255);
FP_DATE DATE;
LP_CHANNEL VARCHAR2(255);
LP_DATE DATE;
REC_COUNT NUMBER(3);
TYPE REC_SA IS RECORD
(AGREEMENT_NO NUMBER (9));
TYPE REC_CHANNEL IS RECORD
(CHANNEL VARCHAR2(3),
AGREEMENT_NO NUMBER (9));
BEGIN
FOR REC_SA IN (SELECT DISTINCT SUBSCRIBER_NO FROM RPT1120B_T1_new) LOOP
     FP_CHANNEL := '';
     LP_CHANNEL := '';
     REC_COUNT := 0;
     FP_DATE := '';
     LP_DATE := '';
     FOR REC_CHANNEL IN      (SELECT distinct decode(SOC,
                                   29990,'N',
                                   29991,'V',
                                   29993,'M',
                                   29988,'F',
                                   29989,'L',
                                   29992,'S',
                                   29994,'D',
                                   29995,'E',
                                   30277,'C',
                                   30293,'C',
                                   30319,'C',
                                   30359,'C',
                                   30276,'X',
                                   30331,'X',
                                   30299,'X',
                                   30380,'X')
                    AS CHANNEL,SA.EFFECTIVE_DATE as soc_sts_date
               FROM      SERVICE_AGREEMENT SA
               WHERE      SA.SOC in (          29990,
                                   29991,
                                   29993,
                                   29988,
                                   29989,
                                   29992,
                                   29994,
                                   29995,
                                   30277,
                                   30293,
                                   30319,
                                   30359,
                                   30276,
                                   30331,
                                   30299,
                                   30380) AND
                    SA.AGREEMENT_NO = REC_SA.SUBSCRIBER_NO AND
                    TRUNC(SA.EFFECTIVE_DATE) <> TRUNC(NVL(SA.EXPIRATION_DATE,SYSDATE)) AND
                    SA.EFFECTIVE_DATE = (SELECT MIN(SA1.EFFECTIVE_DATE) FROM SERVICE_AGREEMENT SA1
                              WHERE SA1.AGREEMENT_NO = SA.AGREEMENT_NO AND
                              sa1.soc in (
29990,
                                   29991,
                                   29993,
                                   29988,
                                   29989,
                                   29992,
                                   29994,
                                   29995,
                                   30277,
                                   30293,
                                   30319,
                                   30359,
                                   30276,
                                   30331,
                                   30299,
                                   30380))
                    order by DECODE(channel,'D',1,'M',2,'E',3,'C',4,'X',5,'F',6,'L',7,'N',8,'S',9,'V',10)) LOOP
               REC_COUNT := REC_COUNT + 1;
               if REC_COUNT < 254 then
                    FP_CHANNEL := FP_CHANNEL || REC_CHANNEL.CHANNEL;
               end if;
               FP_DATE := REC_CHANNEL.soc_sts_date;
     END LOOP;
     REC_COUNT := 0;
     FOR REC_CHANNEL IN      (SELECT distinct decode(sa.SOC,
                                   29990,'N',
                                   29991,'V',
                                   29993,'M',
                                   29988,'F',
                                   29989,'L',
                                   29992,'S',
                                   29994,'D',
                                   29995,'E',
                                   30277,'C',
                                   30293,'C',
                                   30319,'C',
                                   30359,'C',
                                   30276,'X',
                                   30331,'X',
                                   30299,'X',
                                   30380,'X')
                    AS CHANNEL,SA.soc_status_date as soc_sts_date
               FROM      SERVICE_AGREEMENT SA,
                    (SELECT MAX(SA1.soc_status_DATE) as soc_date, agreement_no, soc
                    FROM SERVICE_AGREEMENT SA1
                    WHERE soc in(          29990,
                                   29991,
                                   29993,
                                   29988,
                                   29989,
                                   29992,
                                   29994,
                                   29995,
                                   30277,
                                   30293,
                                   30319,
                                   30359,
                                   30276,
                                   30331,
                                   30299,
                                   30380)
                    GROUP BY agreement_no, soc) sa1
               WHERE      SA.SOC in (      29990,
                                   29991,
                                   29993,
                                   29988,
                                   29989,
                                   29992,
                                   29994,
                                   29995,
                                   30277,
                                   30293,
                                   30319,
                                   30359,
                                   30276,
                                   30331,
                                   30299,
                                   30380) AND
                    SA.soc_status_date = sa1.soc_date AND
                    TRUNC(SA.SOC_STATUS_DATE) <> TRUNC(NVL(SA.EXPIRATION_DATE,SYSDATE)) AND
                    SA.SOC_STATUS = (SELECT MIN(SA2.SOC_STATUS) FROM SERVICE_AGREEMENT SA2
                              WHERE SA2.AGREEMENT_NO = SA.AGREEMENT_NO AND sa2.soc = sa.soc
                              and SA2.soc_status_date = SA.soc_status_date)
                    order by DECODE(channel,'D',1,'M',2,'E',3,'C',4,'X',5,'F',6,'L',7,'N',8,'S',9,'V',10)) LOOP
               REC_COUNT := REC_COUNT + 1;
               if REC_COUNT < 254 then
                    LP_CHANNEL := LP_CHANNEL || REC_CHANNEL.CHANNEL;
               end if;
               LP_DATE := REC_CHANNEL.soc_sts_date;
     END LOOP;
     INSERT INTO RPT1120B_CHANNEL_new values
          (REC_SA.SUBSCRIBER_NO,
          substr(FP_CHANNEL,1 essageID=1196758, I have hit with above error and the code did run successfully before the minor change in the portion I have bolded. Appreciate your comment & help.
Attached with the code:
CREATE TABLE RPT1120B_CHANNEL_new
(SUBSCRIBER_NO NUMBER (9),
FP_CHANNEL VARCHAR2(255),
FP_DATE DATE,
FP_DYNASTY CHAR(1),
FP_MOVIE CHAR(1),
FP_FUN CHAR(1),
FP_LEARNING CHAR(1),
FP_NEWS CHAR(1),
FP_SPORTS CHAR(1),
FP_VARIETY CHAR(1),
FP_EMPEROR CHAR(1),
FP_SX1 CHAR(1),
FP_CEL CHAR(1),
LP_CHANNEL VARCHAR2(255),
LP_DATE DATE,
LP_DYNASTY CHAR(1),
LP_MOVIE CHAR(1),
LP_FUN CHAR(1),
LP_LEARNING CHAR(1),
LP_NEWS CHAR(1),
LP_SPORTS CHAR(1),
LP_VARIETY CHAR(1),
LP_EMPEROR CHAR(1),
LP_SX1 CHAR(1),
LP_CEL CHAR(1));
--truncate table RPT1120B_CHANNEL;
create or replace PROCEDURE sp_rpt1120b_new
AS
FP_CHANNEL VARCHAR2(255);
FP_DATE DATE;
LP_CHANNEL VARCHAR2(255);
LP_DATE DATE;
REC_COUNT NUMBER(3);
TYPE REC_SA IS RECORD
(AGREEMENT_NO NUMBER (9));
TYPE REC_CHANNEL IS RECORD
(CHANNEL VARCHAR2(3),
AGREEMENT_NO NUMBER (9));
BEGIN
FOR REC_SA IN (SELECT DISTINCT SUBSCRIBER_NO FROM RPT1120B_T1_new) LOOP
     FP_CHANNEL := '';
     LP_CHANNEL := '';
     REC_COUNT := 0;
     FP_DATE := '';
     LP_DATE := '';
     FOR REC_CHANNEL IN      (SELECT distinct decode(SOC,
                                   29990,'N',
                                   29991,'V',
                                   29993,'M',
                                   29988,'F',
                                   29989,'L',
                                   29992,'S',

The error message has an important hint: "number precision too large"
Change REC_COUNT's type from NUMBER(3) to NUMBER and see what happens.

The datediff function resulted in an overflow. The number of dateparts separating two date/time instances is too large. Try to use datediff with a less precise datepart.

The below function is giving me the hours difference what I wanted, but today it is giving us the below error:
Msg 535, Level 16, State 0, Line 1
The datediff function resulted in an overflow. The number of dateparts separating two date/time instances is too large. Try to use datediff with a less precise datepart.
Please Help..
ALTER FUNCTION [dbo].[GetHoursExcludingWeekdays](@StartDate datetime2,@EndDate datetime2)
returns decimal(12,3)
as
begin
if datepart(weekday,@StartDate) = 1
set @StartDate = dateadd(day,datediff(day,0,@StartDate),1)
if datepart(weekday,@StartDate) = 7
set @StartDate = dateadd(day,datediff(day,0,@StartDate),2)
-- if @EndDate happens on the weekend, set to previous Saturday 12AM
-- to count all of Friday's hours
if datepart(weekday,@EndDate) = 1
set @EndDate = dateadd(day,datediff(day,0,@EndDate),-2)
if datepart(weekday,@EndDate) = 7
set @EndDate = dateadd(day,datediff(day,0,@EndDate),-1)
declare @return decimal(12,3)
set @return = ((datediff(second,@StartDate,@EndDate)/60.0/60.0) - (datediff(week,@StartDate,@EndDate)*48))
return @return
end
ReportingServices

You'll get this error if the difference between the start and end date is greater that about 68 years due to the "second" DATEDIFF specification. Perhaps the dates are greater than the expected range due to a data quality issue.
Taking the advice from the error message, you could use minutes instead of seconds like the example below the version below. This could still result in the error of the difference is greater than a couple of hundred years, though. You might consider
validating the dates and returning NULL if outside expected limits.
ALTER FUNCTION [dbo].[GetHoursExcludingWeekdays](@StartDate datetime2,@EndDate datetime2)
returns decimal(12,3)
as
begin
if datepart(weekday,@StartDate) = 1
set @StartDate = dateadd(day,datediff(day,0,@StartDate),1)
if datepart(weekday,@StartDate) = 7
set @StartDate = dateadd(day,datediff(day,0,@StartDate),2)
-- if @EndDate happens on the weekend, set to previous Saturday 12AM
-- to count all of Friday's hours
if datepart(weekday,@EndDate) = 1
set @EndDate = dateadd(day,datediff(day,0,@EndDate),-2)
if datepart(weekday,@EndDate) = 7
set @EndDate = dateadd(day,datediff(day,0,@EndDate),-1)
declare @return decimal(12,3)
set @return = ((datediff(minute,@StartDate,@EndDate)/60.0) - (datediff(week,@StartDate,@EndDate)*48))
return @return
end
GO
Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

How can I insert a number of photos in a numbers doc without the file becoming too large?

How can I insert a number of photos into a numbers doc without the file becoming too large?

Use smaller photos.
Seriously, reduce the file size of the photos in Preview, PhotoShop, iPhoto or other application before inserting tehem into the Numbers document.
Regards,
Barry

Hi. I purchased Adobe Acrobat Xi Pro from a store (card). I submitted the number (under the scratch area on the card) on the adobe website, with my personal details etc. When I submitted the form, I got an error message: 413 header length too large (a

Hi. I purchased Adobe Acrobat Xi Pro from a store (card). I submitted the number (under the scratch area on the card) on the adobe website, with my personal details etc. When I submitted the form, I got an error message: 413 header length too large (and on top the page reads JRun Servelet Error). What does this mean? What should I do next?

Hi. I purchased Adobe Acrobat Xi Pro from a store (card). I submitted the number (under the scratch area on the card) on the adobe website, with my personal details etc. When I submitted the form, I got an error message: 413 header length too large (and on top the page reads JRun Servelet Error). What does this mean? What should I do next?

Subsequent debit in miro - Number of items in document is too large

Dear Experts
When i am doing subsequent debit in miro I am getting the eror "Number of items in document is too large" I have alreday posted invoice now i am doing subsequent debit .
Please do the need full
Regards
San

Hi,
check this blog:
( Restriction of Maximum 999 FI Document Items During MM transactions )
Restriction of Maximum 999 FI Document Items During MM transactions
Best regards.

"argument number too large" in OEM import export app

Hi everybody,
I am a beginer with Oracle 9i and I am facing a strange error message when I try to import/export data from OEM connecter to my Oracle Enterprise Manager server.
The user loged in is the SYSMAN user.
When I launch the Import or Export applet on the selected database, Oracle send me the folowing message :
(sorry for my french to english translation)
"The following error occurs when you attemps to connect to the database with the login parameters
argument number too large at"
My Oracle 9i is installed on a clean test platform : NT4server + SP6 french version, dual proc and 512 Mb RAM.
Can somebody help me ? I am unable to import/export data with the GUI.
Thank you.
Frangois.

To view your folio on your iPad you have two choices:
1 - If you built your folio offline on your local machine, choose the upload option from the Folio Builder fly out menu. All folios that were built online and any you uploaded are available for you to download when you log into ACV on your iPad.
2 - This is a MAC only option. Plug your iPad into your computer via the USB cable. With the iPad turned on and ACV opened you will see a Preview on [iPad Name] from the preview menu in folio builder.
I tested both of the supplied files after publishing them for the web from Edge and placing the html files in a web overlay. I previewed on both the desktop viewer and my iPad. Both worked as expected on the iPad. The Jams worked in a desktop preview but your logo just showed a red box. The white background is removed by selecting the transparent background option in the Overlay panel.
As Bob said, the desktop previewer is not 100% reliable. It is used for quick, down and dirty checking. It's always pest to preview on a device if something does not work as expected.
If it helps, I will share my test folio with you. Message me you email address.

BW Web Report Issue - Result set too large

Hi,
When I execute a BEx Query on Web I am getting “Result set too large ; data retrieval restricted by configuration (maximum = 500000 cells)”.
Following to my search in SDN I understood we can remove this restriction either across the BW system globally or for a specific query at WAD template.
In my 7x Web template I am trying to increase default max no of rows parameters, As per the below inputs from SAP Note: 1127156.
But I can’t find parameter “Size Restriction for Result Sets” for any of the web items (Analysis/Web Template properties/Data Provider properties)….in the WAD Web template
Please advise where/how can I locate the properites
Instructions provided in SAP Note…
The following steps describe how to change the "safety belt" for Query Views:
1. Use the context menu Properties / Data Provider in a BEx Web Application to maintain the "safety belt" for a Query View.
2. Choose the register "Size Restriction for Result Sets".
3. Choose an entry from the dropdown box to specify the maximum number of cells for the result set.
The following values are available:
o Maximum Number
o Default Number
o Custom-Defined Number
Behind "Maximum Number" and "Default Number" you can find the current numbers defined in the customizing table RSADMIN (see below).
4. Save the Query View and use it in another Web Template.
Thanks in advance

Hi Yasemin,
Thanks for all help...i was off couple of days.
To activate it I can suggest to create a dummy template, add your query in it, add a menu bar component add an action to save the query view. Then you run the template and change the size restriction for result set then you can save it by the menu.
Can you please elaborate on the solution provided,I created dummy template with analysis and Menu bar item...i couldn't able to configure menu bar item...
Thanks in advance

I am trying to download my paid for Elements 13 upgrade. When I click on the "download" button, I recieve this message: 413 Header Length too Large

I am trying to download my paid for Elements 13 upgrade. When I click on the "download" button, I receive this message: 413 Header Length too Large. Help?

You can download using direct download link , which I had provided.
Download Photoshop Elements products | 13, 12, 11, 10
During installation , when prompted enter serial number and proceed with the installation .
If you had purchased upgrade serial number.
First enter Photoshop Elements 13 serial number .
Then it will ask for previous qualifying version serial number.
From the drop down list , select Photoshop Elements 12 and then enter Photoshop Elements 12 serial number

ERROR : OpenDoc CR to PDF - File is too large for attachment.

We are getting the following error in 3.1 using an OpenDoc call when we call a large Crystal Report to PDF format...
Error : 52cf6f8f4bbb6d3.pdf File is too large for attachment.
It runs OK from BOE when given parameters that returned 44 pages. (PDF = 139 KB)
We get the error on a parameter-set that returns 174 pages when run via CR Desktop or as a SCHEDULED Instance. (PDF = 446 KB).
Client application can't use the SDKs to SCHEDULE Instances - only configured for OpenDoc calls.....
The BOE server is running on SOLARIS - and it's is a 2 Server CMS-Cluster.
The problem is SPORADIC, so I am thinking the issue is related to a specific setting on one of the servers.
Any thoughts on where to start looking...?

Problem is _not _with the number of Rows returned - it is an issue with the size of the PDF file that it is trying to move.
Found a possible WINDOWS solution on BOB - need to find if there is an equivalent for SOLARIS...
Check the dsws.properties on web server D:\Program Files\Business Objects\Tomcat55\webapps\dswsbobje\WEB-INF\classes
See if you can change any parameter to remove size limitation.
#Security measure to limit total upload file size
maximumUploadFileSize = 10485760

Rep-1813:object r_supp_name too large to fix in matrix cell.

hi all,
im getting an issue while running orale report.
i used layout model as matrix.
im getting error as:
rep-1813:object r_supp_name too large to fix in matrix cell.
r_supp_name is repeating frame of supplier_name field.
i had already set maximum number of records but still my issue not solved.
im unable to rectify it anyone please help me.
thanks,

Dear,
I am facing the same problem my question is that you resolve your issue about REP-1813 or still pending if solved kindly share with us.
Regards,
K.J.J.C

(413) Request Entity too large intermittent error

I have page in a SharePoint 2013 website which is viewed over https. The page has several input fields including two file upload controls. I am trying to upload a sample picture less than 1MB for each of the controls.
I am calling a BizTalk WCF service on Submit. Sometimes, when I try to submit I get ‘413 Request Entity Too Large'. This error happens intermittently though because if I try submitting the same data a number of times, it fails sometimes and works other times.
The binding settings for the service are set in code (not in Web.Config) as shown below ...
var binding = RetrieveBindingSetting();
var endpoint = RetrieveEndPointAddress(“enpointAddress”);
var proxy = new (binding, endpoint);
proxy.Create(request);
public BasicHttpBinding RetrieveBindingSetting()
var binding = new BasicHttpBinding
MaxBufferPoolSize = 2147483647,
MaxBufferSize = 2147483647,
MaxReceivedMessageSize = 2147483647,
MessageEncoding = WSMessageEncoding.Text,
ReaderQuotas = new System.Xml.XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas
MaxDepth = 2000000,
MaxStringContentLength = 2147483647,
MaxArrayLength = 2147483647,
MaxBytesPerRead = 2147483647,
MaxNameTableCharCount = 2147483647
Security =
Mode = BasicHttpSecurityMode.Transport,
Transport = { ClientCredentialType = HttpClientCredentialType.Certificate }
return binding;
I have also set the uploadReadAheadSize in applicationHost.config file on IIS as by running the command below, as suggested here ...
appcmd.exe set config "sharepoint" -section:system.webserver/serverruntime /uploadreadaheadsize:204800 /commit:apphost
Nothing I do seems to fix this issue so I was wondering if anyone had any ideas?
Thanks

Sounds like it's not a SharePoint problem, does the page work correctly if you don't call the BizTalk WCF service? And what happens if a console app is calling the WCF service independently of SharePoint, does it fail then as well? In both cases, it would
limit the troubleshooting scope to the WCF service, which gets you a step further.
Kind regards,
Margriet Bruggeman
Lois & Clark IT Services
web site: http://www.loisandclark.eu
blog: http://www.sharepointdragons.com

Number precision too large

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for