ODelivery proposal-different dates in ATP process

Hi Team,
Pls help to understand the scenario below for ATP;
Sales order requested date is -20.08.2014-quantity 1000
Existing stock - 0
Open production order –date in MD04 and actual end date in PO-21.08.2014-quantitiy 1000
Now when am trying to do ATP check it shows as,
Dely/Conf.Date 23.08.2014 / 21.08.2014 Confirmed qty- why there are two different dates in ATP delivery proposal tab. How 23.08.2014 is showing ? which is the date system considers for ATP?
Thanks for the advise,
Regards,
Vijesh
Moderator message:
Discussion locked.
Reason: Basic & no effort on search & trail.
Suggestion to OP: We would advise you review SCN Rules of Engagement: The SCN Rules of Engagement
A good way to search the forum is with Google. Refer following blog link :
http://scn.sap.com/community/support/blog/2012/04/16/getting-the-most-out-of-google-optimizing-your-search-queries
The discussions are not a replacement for proper training.
This blog describes how to use the SCN search: http://scn.sap.com/community/about/blog/2012/12/04/how-to-use-scn-search
Therefore, you need to put some effort in search & trail, before you post your query as discussion. In addition that for better respond, explain your effort & understanding on that. Because " Asking Good Questions in the SCN Discussion Spaces will help you get Good Answers.
Message was edited by Moderator: Jyoti Prakash

Hi Vijesh.vijayan
vijesh vijayan wrote after the Moderator posted his comment in initial post:
Hi Venu,
Can you pls help me to how to make the changes in factory calendar
Regards,
Vijesh
It seems like you are ignoring Moderator's remarks.
Again," Discussions are not a replacement for proper training."
Thanks & Regards,
JP

Similar Messages

Reusing Human Tasks across BPM Processes with different Data Objects

Hi
JDeveloper 11.1.1.6, WLS 10.3.6, SOA/BPM 11.1.1.6
I have defined 2 BPM Processes, P1 and P2, which has 2 different Process Data Objects O1 and O2.
But I am reusing the same Human Task in both the processes.
For the Human Task to support the activities in both the processes, I have added O1 and O2 Data Objects in the Human Task Definition.
And hence the ADF Taskflow / page generated out of the Human Task will have both the Data Objects O1 and O2 as payload objects in the Page.
When an instance of Process P1 is created, the payload O1 will have values, but O2 will be null.
And when an instance of Process P2 is created, the payload O2 will have values, but O1 will be null.
It works well like this, but I am a bit concerned about the performance from BPM Process and also ADF page.
In ADF page, let us say, somehow I can control the rendering of the attributes or creation of the iterator bindings based on identifying which process is being executed.
(By setting the iterator binding refresh property in page definition)
In this way attribute bindings for O1 will not be created when P2 is being executed.
But still when the Process instance is created, and when we see the payload structure of the human task in the EM - Audit Trail,
I still see both data objects O1 and O2 are created in the Payload, but O1 will have nulls in process P2.
So my question is, from performance point of view, is it advisable to define different Data Objects in reusable Human tasks ?
Or should I have to define a separate Human Task definition which contains only the Data Objects related to the process it is being called from ?
Thanks for any help
Sameer

Martijn,
You are correct in your assessment that the JAG in the current JHeadstart release cannot cope with multiple bc4j packages. There is no work around for this. Upgrading to 9051 will not help.
In the JHeadstart-ADF release, this restriction has been lifted. You can place your EO, VO and AM objects in different packages, and you can group them in a separate project (Model project), while generating your JHeadstart application in a ViewController project.
We have a number of customers that use the latest JHeadstart-ADF builds to build their ADF apps. If you are interested in joining this beta program, please send an e-mail to [email protected]
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Getting Error/Note - Scheduling Falied ATP Processing error . Available date 15 may - while Booking SO

Hi All,
we are getting Note "Scheduling Falied ATP Processing error . Available date 15 may" - while Booking SO,
We have checked and found Data collection and ASCP plans also completed normal, and DB links are also fine.
Can there be anther reason for this?
Note - After changing the request date to 15 May also same error exists.
Regards

Hi Kumar,
We also faced same kind of issue where Instance was refreshed after data collection and DB links where not properly set, This can be one of the cause.
Regards

How to process reports with two different date fields

Morning all,
This question is somewhat similar to what I asked few days back. I created two different reports for two different departments (Credit Control and Free of Charge Control).
These two reports pull data from two different date fields and has different status check ups.
Few days back my director requested me if he can have both reports in one report. That is when I asked question from all of you regarding two reports.
Anyhow, that was created by implementing two sub reports however, the director asked me to combine the two different reports into one in such a way that the output records should be added up with each other hence one single report with all combined data of Credit Control and Free of Charges (not two sub reports in one report).
The problem here which I am getting is that, both reports uses two different date fields. I can live with two different statuses as that can be easily done within formula/RT however how to create a report with Report Selection Formula condition which looks in both date fields and produces results accordingly?
I have tried this by not putting any condition in report selection formula and ran the report, it produced total results from past 6 years.
Any ideas how to produce combined report which has two different date fields?
Many thanks in advance
Regards
Jehanzeb
What I

Charliy,
No the both dates are from two different databases, tables and fields. The Credit date field is from KLAB database under max table where as the FOC date field is from SAE database under maxmast table. Klab date is under credit2 table where as foc date is under order header table.
So its more like this:
Klab->Max-Credit2--->Credit_date
Sae->Maxmast->Order_header---Date entered.
two dates totally different tables, dbs
however, I will try your idea too and see if that works.
Regards
Jehanzeb

Changing proposed delivery date in sales order for one specific sales org

Hi All,
I want to change proposed delivery date in sales order automatically for one specific sales org only without changing lead time in VOV8.
For that can I use MV45AFZZ. But it is asking access key to make changes. Is there any other user exit for the same. And how does exactly change it.
Thanks in advanced.
Points will be awarded.
Regards,

EXIT_SAPFV45E_001 has nothing to do with this - it is meant to update the purchase order from a sales order. It might not even be triggered if the sales order has no link to a purchase order.
USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT is not really good for this either, because the delivery date has to be changed before that. If memory serves, it also influences the schedule lines and probably the ATP check and such. I would strongly advise against it. One of the other routines in MV45AFZZ should do just fine, USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAK for example.

Issue in moving files from data fodler to processed folder in background

Hi All,
I am facing one issue in moving files from data fodler to processed folder in case of background execution.
When i am executing the file in the foreground, i can move the file from Data folder to processed folder. I am using SXPG_COMMAND_EXECUTE FM to move the file from data folder to processed folder. I can see the file in processed folder once the program is executed.
But in case of executing the same program in background, it is giving me the error "Failed to move the file to processed folder" in the spool of SM37 and i can see the file still laying in data folder.
I tried to check other programs which acesses the same folder as the above program, whether they are able to move. They are able to move the file to processed fodler successfully both in foreground and background mode.
Please help me in resolving this issue.
Thanks,
Deepa

Hi Sanu,
Please use teh following code to move the file from source to target folder.
This is a code showing how to create and use COPY command of UNIX in ABAP
PARAMETERS:
Input file path
p_input TYPE localfile,
Processed file path
p_proc TYPE localfile.
Declare the Types to file data
TYPES: BEGIN OF L_X_OUTPUT,
sys(200), " Please note, there are asterisk before and after sys (i.e.sys)
END OF L_X_OUTPUT.
* Internal table to store file data
DATA l_i_output TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF l_x_output WITH HEADER LINE.
* Variable for the UNIX command
DATA: l_v_unix_comm(255) TYPE c.
Copy command of UNIX
CONCATENATE 'mv' p_input p_proc
INTO l_v_unix_comm SEPARATED BY space.
For example the Copy command is stored as below
cp u2018/data/interfaces/input/input_fileu2019 u2018/data/interfaces/processed/processed_fileu2019
Examples of UNIX Command *u2022 mv filename1 filename2 --- moves a file (i.e. gives it a different name, or moves it into a *different directory (see below) *u2022 cp filename1 filename2 --- copies a file
Execute the UNIX Copy command.
This command will copy the file from input file path to the processed file path
CALL 'SYSTEM' ID 'COMMAND' FIELD l_v_unix_comm
ID 'TAB'
FIELD l_i_output-sys.
IF sy-subrc eq 0.
write: 'File is copied successfully using UNIX command in ABAP'.
ENDIF.

Issue found in EHS in using specification data import using process

Dear EHS community
Now using EHS classic for a long time a issue has been detected in EHS standard import. During maintenance of EHS data normally using CG02 the system is always using the default "Data origin" specified in customizing to be stored in EHS tables (e.g. ESTRH, ESTRI etc.). In standard process to import specification data one can define a different "Data origin". Now we are using an import file with default" data origin and executed the import. Now a strange effect has been detected (and not always) for update of identifiers. For the import purpose you must nominate at least one identifier. If the identifier is found then normally no update happens but only the value assignment data is inserted (or updated). If the identifier is not found it get be inserted on spec level in ESTRI. Now during the update the "Data origin" of the identifier present in the system (and which matched to identifier on file level) was changed but not the identifier as such. Any data record on value assignment level received the defautl data origin. Actually there is no explanation for this behaviour. If Default "Data origin" would be "SAP" (as the term) this value has been change to "Space". Any explanation of this effect is appreciated (or and idea regarding that).
C.B.
PS: analysis of change logs in EHS etc. executed so far clearly indictae that an "Update" happened on the identifier; but only the field SRSID is effected; EHS import is quite old and therefore very stable;
PPS: I found a thread taking about the import file:
spec import_inheritance data
Example shown thre is like:
+BS
+BV   $ESTRH
SRSID                          EH&S
SUBID                          000000385000
SUBCAT                         REAL_SUB
AUTHGRP                        EHS_PS
+EV
+BV   $ESTRI
SRSID                          EH&S
IDTYPE                         NAM
IDCAT                          EHS_OLD
IDENT                          XY0002
ORD                            0001
+EV
+BV   SAP_EHS_1013_001
$ESTVA-SRSID                   EH&S
SAP_EHS_1013_001_VALUE         N09.00101280
+EV
If you compare SAP helpt normally only at the"begining pof the file you will find "SRSID" Here this field is nominated often. On Level of ESTRH as well as ESTRI.
PPS: e.g. refer to: TCG56 EHS: Data Origin - SAP Table - ABAP

Dear Ralph
first thanks for feedback. Regarding content provider: we need to check that on deeper level
Regarding import may be my explanation was not good enough.
Imagine this case:
you have a specification in the system there you would like to add e.g. denisity data.. To do so you need at least one identifier which you must nominate during the import. As long as this identifier is "identical" in system and in the file this identifier should not be "changed/effected" etc. and only the additional data should be loaded, This was the process we used. Now we detected that this seems not to be the real effect. The identifier as part of the file is "updated" in EH&S. In the example above somebody used this logic:
+BV   $ESTRI
SRSID                          EH&S
IDTYPE                         NAM
IDCAT                          EHS_OLD
IDENT                          XY0002
ORD                            0001
+EV
Nearly the same is used in our process. Only difference ist, that we do not define the "SRSID". The same is true for any other data in the file. SRSID is nether specified.
What is happing now:
e.g. the "density" data is added with SRSID "EH&S". This effect is "normal". As by default SRSID should be EH&S (as this is defined as such in customizing) and because of the fact that at the top the ID is es well "EH&S". In the system we have the "XY0002" having SRSID EH&S. By using now this upload approach the only difference afterwards is tht kin th systeM; XY0002 does get "blank" as SRSID (and there is no data origin "blank" defined. Up to today my unertsanding was clearly: no update should happen in the identifier. This seems not to be the case. Is my understanding here different? Or is this SRSID in the load file is really mandatory in ESTRI level to avoid this effect. I hope that you can provide some feedback regarding this.
C.B.
PS: referring to: Example: Transfer File for Specifications - Basic Data and Tools (EHS-BD) - SAP Library
The header of import file should look like:
Comment
+C
Administrative section
Character standard
+SC
ISO-R/3
Identification (database name)
+ID
IUCLID
Format version
+V
2.21
Export date
+D
19960304
Key date for export
+VD
19960304
Set languages for export
+SL
E
Date format
+DF
DD.MM.YYYY
IN our case +ID = EH&S (as this is the value in export file)
IN this example this additional one is shown:
Begin table
+BV
$ESTRI
Table field
IDTYPE
NAM
Table field
IDCAT
IUPAC
Table field
IDENT
anisole
Table field
LANGU
E
Table field
OWNID
ID1
Therefore no SRSID is specified. And this is the data in our file (on high level) and the "only" change is that the identifer get "deleted" the SRSID

Different Date Formats in the same "From"

Hello
We used different date formats depending on the users language.
In a report this is simple to implement ... read the date field twice (in different formats dd/mm/yyyy and mm/dd/yyyy) and display only one based on the language.
I want to be able to do the same in a "form" which updates a date. In this case the about is not allowed.
Has anyone have solution for this using "APEX" forms or do a need to write a process to achieve this?
Thanks
Pete

Pete,
You don't specify what version of Application Express you're using, so I'll assume APEX 3.1 or later.
Are you setting the date format yourself, based upon the user's language?
1) You could have the application's language derived from Browser, and then APEX would automatically set the NLS_LANGUAGE and NLS_TERRITORY settings accordingly. Then, I would simply use 'DS' as the Application Date Format. For Date Pickers on a form, I would use item type 'Date Picker (use Application Date Format)'.
2) If you're already determining the date format yourself and you don't want APEX to do it for you, ensure that you are setting this value in an application item (e.g., PETE_DATE_FORMAT). Then, you could still use Application Date Format with a value of &PETE_DATE_FORMAT. (inclusive of the trailing period).
When you use Application Date Format, the conversion should happen automatically for you so that you don't have to code this yourself on the Form.
I hope this helps.
Joel

Problem in setting user end date from oim to account expiry date in AD process form

Hi all,
i am updating the user end date from oim to user account expiry date in ad process form using oim api.
i am able to get the end date value from oim but when i am setting it using api it through exception but all other attribute i am able to update in process form.
i am facing the problem only with end date field because of different date format in OIM and AD .
so please suggest me what are date format in Active Directory and how can i change the oim date format to Active directory time format in in my java code.

Thanks for the reply.
But all iplanet users need not contain end date attribute, and its an update on existing user.
Can you please ellaborate more on Transformation class..?? example should be helpful.

How do I calculate days from two different dates?

Hi all,
How do I calculate days from two different dates?
my requirement is to pass the number of days to target field from two dates.
Current date : 14/04/2010
Standard date: 01/01/1957 is the standard = day 0
Is it possible in graphical mapping with out udf?
Plz help me on this I have donu2019t have much knowledge on JAVA.
Thanks

Hi Yadav,
Probably this is not the correct forum for XI / PI .
You can post the same to...
Process Integration (PI) & SOA Middleware
Hope this helps.
Regards
Raj

How do I calculate days from two different dates in XI/PI?

Hi all,
How do I calculate days from two different dates in XI/PI?
my requirement is to pass the number of days to target field from two dates.
Current date : 14/04/2010
Standard date: 01/01/1957 is the standard = day 0
Is it possible in graphical mapping with out udf?
Plz help me on this I have donu2019t have much knowledge on JAVA.
Thanks

Hi Yadav,
Probably this is not the correct forum for XI / PI .
You can post the same to...
Process Integration (PI) & SOA Middleware
Hope this helps.
Regards
Raj

How to report on 2 different dates in one report?

Hello,
I need to have Date in a sales report represent both Actual Goods Issue Date and Planned Goods Issue Date depending on the sales order status (i.e. shipped or still in process).
The report format is like:
Date--Sales--
Orders
Jan 1                                    $0                         $100
Jan 2                                    $50                       $150
Jan 3                                    $100                     $300
Sales is defined as shipped items. Orders are just all incoming sales orders.
I need Date for Sales to be Actual GI date, and for Orders to be Planned GI date.
In a customized DSO we have both these dates available, and currently, Calendar Day, Calendar Week are pointing to Planned GI date.
Thanks.

For those who might come across this note, the design issue was solved by incorporating Rule Groups.
Problem:
Need to have 2 different Date references for 0calday, based on the key figures. For example for Sales key figure date it would reference to Actual GI Date. But, for Intake key figure I needed the date reference to be Planned GI date.
Solution-- applied to the transfer rules of the desired cube:
1. In the starndard rule group delete the transfer rule for the appropriate key figures. in this case (sales key figure)
2. In the same rule group map all time characteristics from the cube to Planned GI date from DSO
3. Create a new rule group in the transfer rule between the DSO and the Info Cube
4. In the new rule group, create a new rule for the appropriate key figure i.e. sales
5. In the new rule group, Map the date/week/month/fiscal period to Actual GI date
6. save/activate
This solution eliminates the need for changing the data model, which makes everything almost transparent to the report users.
Hope this helps someone.
Edited by: Babak Shafiei on Dec 12, 2008 5:23 PM
Edited by: Babak Shafiei on Dec 12, 2008 5:24 PM

Different Data sources for dimensions & Facts

Hi
Here is my scenario. For our POC purpose, we are just trying to access dimensions, & Facts from 2 different data sources.
Dimensions come from db2 and Fact table comes from a different source.
My question here is did any one faced issues like this ? I am wondering whether i need to join these tables physically in the phyical layer or should i have to take care of them in the BMM Layer.
Thanks in advance for any of ur ideas

As mentioned you will need to join across data bases. One thing you will see when you do this is that OBIEE will do a bulk select across those databases then join and filter logically in its own memory process. If you MUST join across databases at least propagate the common dimensions across both databases; that way at least OBIEE can do a semi-filtered grab of the data from each database before it joins the resultsets in memory.

Proposed delivery date should not get copied to the target document

Hi gurus,
I am creating a quotation and it is taking proposed delivery date as creation date and confirming a schedule line. When i create the sales order the same data is coped to the sale order. I have a different delivery date in sales order , but the system dose not allow me to change the date saying that a schedule line already confirmed for this line item.
I have unticked the copy schedule line the copay control of item category from quotation to order. still the same problem...pls help

Hi,
If you carefully look at the problem, the root cause is not at the schedule line but at the document header where the delivery date is given.
So if you really dont want the delivery date to be copied, you should do that in a new copying routine and in that routine, you should copy all the details except the delivery date. This means that even if you create with reference, system will ask you for requested delivery date. Now you can give the delivery date of your choice and further scheduling will happen automatically.

Proposed Delivery Date - Sales Order

Dear Experts,
I have a problem when we are creation a sales order with transaction VA01. We created a large group of sales order on Saturday. But the delivery date of those Sales Orders is different despit of all those orders we created the same day.
Some order had delivery date for the same day that the order, others have the delivery date for one day later, and other for two days later.
I've checked master data for customers, material... but nothing.
Please help with this issue...
Javier Sandoval

Though you have not indicated whether for the same material, stock is confirming on different dates in sale order, I am presuming that my understanding is in line with this, first check in material master MRP2 view where you can see two fields In-House Production and GR Processing. Check any value is maintained there.
Next go to TCode OVLZ and check the field "In Pick/pack time wrkdys" whether any numeric value is maintained there. Depending upon this, stock will be confirmed in sale order.
Finally check in VOV8 - Field "Lead Time in Days"
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

ODelivery proposal-different dates in ATP process

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for