OIM 11gR2 provisioning with GTC

Hello,
We are curently implementing Oracle Identity Manager 11gR2, and we are having difficulties with the implementation of the provisioning from OIM to the Target Systems exposed through a webservice on Oracle Service Bus.
We are using the Generic Technology Connectors as a basis of working. And initially we have created a GTC with only reconciliation Transport & Format Providers:
Connector Name TargetSystem1
Transport Provider (Provisioning):
Format Provider (Provisioning):
Transport Provider (Reconciliation): Database Application Tables Reconciliation
Format Provider (Reconciliation): Database Application Tables Reconciliation
We have configured the Process Definition of TargetSystem1 with all the operations (Create User, Update User, Enable User, Disable User, Delete User, etc.) connected with custom Java implementations, that are working just fine is we trigger them form Eclipse. The “Create User” task has only “Required for Completion”, “Allow Cancelation while Pending” and “Allow multiple instances” check boxes set to CHECKED; it also has all the fields in Integration TAB mapped, Responses mapped, but when we create a User in OIM and provision it with an account on the TargetSystem1_GTC Application Instance, the provisioning process in not accessing the “Create User” task to make the provisioning in the target system. The user that we are trying to provision has the account Status set to “Provisioning” and the Account Type set to “Unknown”. We have also checked the logs of OSB, but there is no activity there, because no request from OIM is being received.
After we investigated more closely the Oracle documentation for the Generic Technology Connectors we discovered that if we do not select Transport & Format Providers during the GTC creation, then the corresponding steps are not performed and they are not initialized, thus the provisioning cannot be done. The documentation also states that if we need to create custom providers in order to make the Provisioning with the GTC, but unfortunately we have no knowledge or any examples on how to do such custom providers for the provisioning of Users from OIM on the target systems via the Oracle Service Bus.
We have installed a second GTC with both provisioning and reconciliation Transport & Format Providers:
Connector Name: TargetSystem2
Transport Provider (Provisioning): Web Services
Format Provider (Provisioning): SPML
Transport Provider (Reconciliation): Database Application Tables Reconciliation
Format Provider (Reconciliation): Database Application Tables Reconciliation
The Web Services and SPML options were the only options that we could select from the out of the box connectors that are installed, and we did not find any other connectors in the download section of Oracle for this product, that can accommodate such communication. So, we configured the provisioning accordingly, and modified the “Create User” task from the TargetSystem2_GTC Process Definition, in order to use our custom adaptor instead of the adpTargetSystem2_GTC adapter that was preset when the TargetSystem2_GTC is created. But this does not help us, because the provisioning is not done, and the “Create User” task is not used. The user that we are trying to provision has the account Status set to “Provisioning” and the Account Type set to “Unknown”.
Next we tried to see if the GTC can be used to communicate directly with the OSB, using the Web Services Transport Provider and SPML Format Provider, and we did not make any modifications to the after the normal installation of the TargetSystem2 GTC. In this case the we can see that the OSB is being accessed by OIM, but unfortunately this case does not help us also, because the operations implemented on the OSB webservice have a different structure then the one SPML expects as default:
Caused by: com.thortech.xl.gc.exception.XSDValidationException: The SOAP response does not contain a valid SPML response type. Should be one of these -->addResponse modifyResponse deleteResponse resumeResponse suspendResponse setPasswordResponse
Do you have any suggestion on how to make the provisioning process work?
Edited by: user1717356 on 22.10.2012 03:22

Hi,
I think you need to put this check only for few attributes?
If Yes, then lets suppose you want to have a check for Country Field in Database which once modified by target Admin, then OIM should know.
1) Create one dummy field CountryDummy (Hidden) in OIM TargetProcess form and dont map it to any target attributes. This dummy field will only store values populated from OIM user profile to -> DB Connector Process Form.
2) On success of "Reconcilation Update Recievced", Put a custom process task which does a comparison with "CountryDummy" & "Country" and inform Admin using email notifications that this mismatch has been found.
HTH,
~J

Similar Messages

  • OIM - Users provisioned with different resource form versions

    Hi !!
    we are having some problems with different resource form versions and maybe you can help us.
    We have two different versions of one resource form. One of them has 2 extra fields.
    Some users were provisioned with that resource with the previous form version (no extra fields) and some with the new one (extra fields).
    The problem is that now, if we try to edit that resource for the users with the old version, we are not able to edit or even see the information for those extra fields.
    It seems that they have been associated with the old version and we need to change it in order to make them use the new one. Is that possible? How can we fix that?
    Thanks in advance.

    Alternatively you can manually update the form version in the OIM database.
    If it is a small number of forms it might be easier to do that then to bother with fvc.
    Best regards
    /Martin

  • Create Organizations in OIM by recon with GTC Database App tables

    Hello,
    Does anybody know if and how you can create organizations instead of users in OIM when using the GTC DataBase Application Tables connector?
    Thank you,
    Ionut.

    Very unlikely verging on the impossible.
    I would recommend writing your own connector. As you only need a little bit of JDBC and call the createOrganization in tcOrganizationOperationsIntf wrapped in a scheduled task this should not be a big issue.
    Good luck
    /M

  • [OIM] Error in Direct Provisioning (with auto save form) - GTC DB App Table

    Hi,
    I am getting an error when setting up direct provision of a GTC DB App Conn using OIM access policy (and group membership) or through manual provisioning with prepopulate and auto save form.
    Manual provisioning with prepopulate ONLY (not with auto save form) WORKS!!!
    Some information about my OIM config:
    - Prepopulate adapters are set up on both forms (parent and child)
    - "Auto prepopulate" and "Auto save form" are set up at Process Definition
    - For direct provisioning, I have created an access policy with an associated group which has a membership rule
    What it is working:
    - Provisioning manually, using prepopulate adapters only, not auto save form. Both tables are updated properly
    - All *3 tasks are called and finished with status=Completed*: "System Validation", "Create User" and "Child Table UD_<connector child table name>_US row Inserted"
    Testing direct provisioning:
    - I have tested adding the resource manually with prepopulate and autosave form configured, and also through access policy/group membership. The error is the same on both tests
    - The resource is displayed as provisioned and it is created an entry in the parent table of the resource, but not on child table
    - I also observed that only: "System Validation" and "Create User" tasks were executed (status=Completed). But it is missing the task "Child Table UD_<connector child table name>_US row Inserted"
    - The error log info displays only an error regarding to UGP table (Groups info) but I am not sure if that is the cause of entry creation on child table.
    It seems the SQL stmt tries to get ugp_name (group name) using ugp_key but that has null value.
    "SELECT ugp_name FROM ugp WHERE ugp_key=java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-00936: missing expression"
    Note: When testing manually (without auto save form), I got "SELECT ugp_name FROM ugp WHERE ugp_key=1" which it is the same SQL stmt but the value is provided.
    My guess:
    - It seems that error is aborting the whole execution process so "Child Table UD_<connector child table name>_US row Inserted" task does not run, even though previous tasks are finished with the status=Completed. Consequently, the entry is not created on child table.
    Please, any guess or help would be very helpful. In case nothing works, I guess I will have to create and customize a "Update child Form" task as an workaround which would be called after "Create User" task.
    Regards,
    Hugo
    My environment:
    - Windows 2003, WebLogic 10.3.0.0, OIM 9.1.0.2 BL4, Oracle 10g, Java 1.6, DB App Table Connector 9.1.0.2 (from October 2009)
    - Target Resource: Parent and Child Table (Oracle 10g - the same OIM DB)

    An update:
    I solved that error about "ORA-00936: missing expression" applying OIM 9.1.0.2 BP05. That was not impacting my issue regarding direct provisioning with auto save form and child form.
    So please if anyone can confirm:
    - Can I set up prepopulate adapters on child forms AND also use "auto save form" on GTC DB App Table connector?
    If not, any suggestion?
    Regards
    Hugo

  • OIM 11gR2 user not provisioning to Active Directory (11.1.1.5 connector)

    Hello all,
    I'm trying to set up an OIM 11gR2 instance to work with Active Directory with the Active Directory 11.1.1.5.0 connector. I've full installed both OIM and AD on separate servers, and I've installed the AD 11.1.1.5 connector on OIM. I have configured Active Directory properly (connector on OIM and the connector server on the AD server-side), and have set up the two IT Resources on OIM. I can run, for example, the Active Directory Organization Lookup Recon job and have it return results in the Lookup window.
    My problem is that I cannot get it to provision to a user. I've created an Application Instance and Form for Active Directory, attached the Form, associated them with the appropriate resources (AD User), and added them to the Catalog, and then gone through the process of adding an account to the user, selecting the Application Instance, adding it to the cart, checking out, filling out the fields (Password, User ID, UPN, First Name, Last Name, Common Name, and Organization Name), and then submitting the request. This is all done as the xelsysadm admin user, but it still results with the account stuck on "Provisioning" because the "Create User" task failed due to a Connector Error (the reason stated is just a repeat of "Create Object" failed).
    Anyone know what I'm missing here?
    Thank you!
    Edited by: 939908 on Nov 12, 2012 6:36 AM

    Hey 833249, thanks for your reply
    The organization field attribute is filled in correctly, in that the OU I selected exists in AD.
    These are the errors listed in the connector server log:
    +11/9/2012 9:07:07 PM <ERROR>: Class-> ActiveDirectoryUtils Method -> GetDirectoryEntry, Message -> Exception occured during the creation of directory entry.+
    +11/9/2012 9:07:07 PM <ERROR>: Class-> ActiveDirectoryUtils Method -> GetDirectoryEntry, Message -> Exception Message : Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password.+
    +11/9/2012 9:07:08 PM <ERROR>: Class-> ActiveDirectoryUtils Method -> GetDirectoryEntry, Message -> Exception Stack Trace : at System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry.Bind(Boolean throwIfFail)+
    at System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry.Bind()
    at System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry.get_NativeObject()
    at Org.IdentityConnectors.ActiveDirectory.ActiveDirectoryUtils.GetDirectoryEntry(String path, ActiveDirectoryConfiguration configuration) in c:\ADE\aime_oimcp\idc\bundles\dotnet\ActiveDirectory\ActiveDirectoryConnector\ActiveDirectoryUtils.cs:line 1423
    +11/9/2012 9:07:08 PM <ERROR>: Class-> ActiveDirectoryConnector Method -> Create, Message -> Encountered Excetion: Unable to get the Directory Entry+
    +11/9/2012 9:07:08 PM <ERROR>: Class-> ActiveDirectoryConnector Method -> Create, Message -> Stack Trace: at Org.IdentityConnectors.ActiveDirectory.ActiveDirectoryUtils.GetDirectoryEntry(String path, ActiveDirectoryConfiguration configuration) in c:\ADE\aime_oimcp\idc\bundles\dotnet\ActiveDirectory\ActiveDirectoryConnector\ActiveDirectoryUtils.cs:line 1456+
    at Org.IdentityConnectors.ActiveDirectory.ActiveDirectoryUtils.DirectoryEntryExists(String path) in c:\ADE\aime_oimcp\idc\bundles\dotnet\ActiveDirectory\ActiveDirectoryConnector\ActiveDirectoryUtils.cs:line 1512
    at Org.IdentityConnectors.ActiveDirectory.ActiveDirectoryConnector.Create(ObjectClass oclass, ICollection`1 attributes, OperationOptions options) in c:\ADE\aime_oimcp\idc\bundles\dotnet\ActiveDirectory\ActiveDirectoryConnector\ActiveDirectoryConnector.cs:line 219
    ConnectorServer.exe Error: 0 : Org.IdentityConnectors.Framework.Common.Exceptions.ConnectorException: Unable to get the Directory Entry
    at Org.IdentityConnectors.ActiveDirectory.ActiveDirectoryConnector.Create(ObjectClass oclass, ICollection`1 attributes, OperationOptions options) in c:\ADE\aime_oimcp\idc\bundles\dotnet\ActiveDirectory\ActiveDirectoryConnector\ActiveDirectoryConnector.cs:line 368
    at Org.IdentityConnectors.Framework.Impl.Api.Local.Operations.CreateImpl.Create(ObjectClass oclass, ICollection`1 attributes, OperationOptions options) in c:\ADE\aime_icf\icf\framework\dotnet\FrameworkInternal\ApiLocalOperations.cs:line 388
    at Org.IdentityConnectors.Framework.Impl.Api.Local.Operations.ConnectorAPIOperationRunnerProxy.Invoke(Object proxy, MethodInfo method, Object[] args) in c:\ADE\aime_icf\icf\framework\dotnet\FrameworkInternal\ApiLocalOperations.cs:line 244
    at ___proxy1.Create(ObjectClass , ICollection`1 , OperationOptions )
    at Org.IdentityConnectors.Framework.Impl.Server.ConnectionProcessor.ProcessOperationRequest(OperationRequest request) in c:\ADE\aime_icf\icf\framework\dotnet\FrameworkInternal\Server.cs:line 609
    I'm not sure why the username/password error could be occurring, as those fields in the AD IT Resource are correct (I've run AD recon jobs that have connected properly). Is there something I'm missing?

  • Problem handling SMTP address with OIM 11gR2 Exchange connector

    Hello,
    I have a problem in regarding the primary SMTP address with the Exchange connector. The connector doesn't seem to be able to update it. Changing a user's primary SMTP address from its account details in OIM creates a new secondary address in Exchange. It does not change the current primary SMTP address. This does not look like a normal behavior... Any ideas on how to fix this?
    I'm using OIM 11gR2 with BP10 with AD 11.1.1.5.0A and Exchange 11.1.1.5.0.
    Thanks,
    --jtellier

    Yes, you can try out few things suggested in below thread
    Re: Exchange Provisioning
    The error looks like form exchange server side but still not sure about it.
    Meantime open Service Request with oracle about the same as I can see other developers are also facing same issue.

  • Account stuck in Provisioning state in OIM 11gR2

    Hello,
    In OIM 11gR2, when provisioning fails, the application still shows in the accounts tab of the user, but it is stuck in the "Provisioning" state. I don't know if it's standard behavior, but it always does this for me. When this problem occurs, the only way I have found to remove the entry from the applications list is to completely delete the application instance and re-create it. Is there a cleaner way of removing the stuck account ? The "Remove Account" button does nothing for me.
    Thanks,
    --jtellier                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

    Rajiv Dewan wrote:
    BDW, if something goes wrong while doing provisioning then you can retry the rejected task (after fixing the issue) instead of initiating provisioning again with new instance. It will mark your existing incomplete instance as PROVISIONED.Oh, thanks, I had not realized that...
    --jtellier                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • OIM 11gR2: GTC logical cancellation

    Hi all,
    in our OIM environment (OIM 11gR2) we have installed and configured a GTC that provisions and reconciliates to and from an Oracle Database Application Table.
    The GTC works fine and when we try to revoke an account, it deletes the account from target system.
    What we would like to implement is the "logical cancellation" functionality. Upon account revocation, the GTC should sets the value "1" to one of the target system fields (named "IS_DELETED") instead deletes it from target system.
    Is it possible to achieve this?
    Thanks in advance,
    Daniele

    Is it possible to achieve this?You can modify the process definition at any point of time. Remove the existing adapter and attach your own adapter which will do the logical cancellation.
    If you are looking for some configuration in GTC itself then I don't think it is possible.

  • Provisioning with OIM

    I want to get started with basic provisioning activities. Already have OIM 11gR2 and Jdev, AD installed.
    I am looking to some basic getting started activities with Provisioning. Please suggest urls, or resources to get started.
    Thanks

    Download AD connector(activedirectory-11.1.1.5.0.zip) from below site and follow connector doc for further steps.
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/id-mgmt/downloads/connectors-101674.html
    Find below link for OIM developer guide
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E27559_01/dev.1112/e27150/toc.htm

  • Provisioning users to AD groups in OIM 11gR2

    I could use some advice on how to resolve this issue I am having.
    Using the Active Directory connector (11.1.1.5) in our OIM 11gR2 development environment I can successfully provision OIM users to our AD resource. I have successfully run the org and group lookup recons, and provisioned users do go into the correction ou in AD.
    However when I select which groups a user should be a member of in the ADUSERC child form (via the lookup), the user is not provisioned with the correct group membership in AD.
    A separate issue is how to map the objectClass in AD in the ProvAttrMap; could anyone point me in the direction of how to go about that?
    Thanks

    The ObjectClass should be configured in this lookup Lookup.Configuration.ActiveDirectory
    Check below
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E22999_01/doc.111/e20347/extnd_func.htm#sthref221
    4.6 Configuring the Connector for User-Defined Object Classes

  • Cannot provision Exchange 2003 account in OIM 11gR2

    Hello,
    I'm trying to provision Exchange 2003 accounts from OIM 11gR2 but I keep getting errors. My AD connector works and is able to reconcile and provision account and my Exchange connector is linked to it. I've understood that the only mandatory fields in the Exchange 2003 provisioning form are "mail store name" and "alias", so I've tested by only filling those. However, the provisioning does not complete and the logs show this error :
    [2013-01-25T11:46:19.292-05:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.ADAPTERS] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: b70c24a5215a6ee3:-625a909b:13c6d3ae4c5:-8000-0000000000002b50,0] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Class/Method: tcAdpEvent/getITAttrVal encounter some problems: Could not find attibute value for IT Resource Key = 0 and attribute = Server Address
    [2013-01-25T11:46:19.293-05:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.ADAPTERS] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: b70c24a5215a6ee3:-625a909b:13c6d3ae4c5:-8000-0000000000002b50,0] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Class/Method: tcAdpEvent/getITAttrVal encounter some problems: Could not find IT asset value for Svr_key = 0 and attribute = Server Address
    [2013-01-25T11:46:19.293-05:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.ADAPTERS] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: b70c24a5215a6ee3:-625a909b:13c6d3ae4c5:-8000-0000000000002b50,0] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Class/Method: tcAdpEvent/getITAttrVal encounter some problems: DATA_ERROR[[
    com.thortech.xl.dataobj.util.tcAdapterTaskException: DATA_ERROR
    at com.thortech.xl.adapterfactory.events.tcAdpEvent.getITAttrVal(tcAdpEvent.java:2023)
    at com.thortech.xl.adapterGlue.ScheduleItemEvents.adpMEXCCREATEMAILBOX.implementation(adpMEXCCREATEMAILBOX.java:90)
    at com.thortech.xl.client.events.tcBaseEvent.run(tcBaseEvent.java:196)
    That's the only error I see and I'm not really sure about what it means. Any ideas?
    Thanks,
    --jtellier                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

    Are you using the version 9 or 11 of the connector? I've done more investigations with version 9 and realized that the DB is not correctly updated by the connector. I've reported the problem with Oracle and a bug has been open. Here are the details :
    When reconciling or provisioning a mailbox, a new row is added in the OIU table. This row has "null" as its APP_INSTANCE_KEY. Manually setting the Exchange's app instance key as the value of this column solves the problem.
    Hope this helps!
    --jtellier                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • OIM 11gR2 - custom attribute with illegal binding on Create User form in published sandbox

    Hi,
    I think I have managed to paint myself into a corner!
    In OIM 11gR2 I have added a number of custom attributes to the "User Form" - some Text-, some Lookup-type attributes.
    While customizing the "Create User" page within a sandbox and adding a SelectOneChoice item and fiddling around with its binding, I was distracted by a phone call and the browser timed out.
    The binding property on the new item is now not correct and the sandbox has unfortunately been published, and I am now unable to enter the "Create User" page - when I try, I get the following:
    <Sep 23, 2013 2:39:11 PM CEST> <Warning> <oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.UIXRegion> <ADF_FACES-00009> <Error processing viewId: /user/createView URI: /oracle/iam/ui/runtime/form/view/pages/userCreateForm.jsff actual-URI: /oracle/iam/ui/runtime/form/view/pages/userCreateForm.jsff.
    javax.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Target Unreachable, 'ekstraresource1__c' returned null
            at com.sun.el.parser.AstValue.getTarget(AstValue.java:108)
            at com.sun.el.parser.AstValue.isReadOnly(AstValue.java:149)
            at com.sun.el.ValueExpressionImpl.isReadOnly(ValueExpressionImpl.java:248)
            at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.EditableValueRenderer._getUncachedReadOnly(EditableValueRenderer.java:486)
            at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.EditableValueRenderer.cacheReadOnly(EditableValueRenderer.java:416)
            at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.LabeledInputRenderer.beforeEncode(LabeledInputRenderer.java:128)
            at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.render.CoreRenderer.encodeEnd(CoreRenderer.java:340)
    <Sep 23, 2013 2:39:11 PM CEST> <Warning> <oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.UIXRegion> <ADF_FACES-00009> <Error processing viewId: /catalog-tf/cart-details URI: /oracle/iam/ui/catalog/pages/cart-details.jsff actual-URI: /oracle/iam/ui/catalog/pages/cart-details.jsff.
    javax.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Target Unreachable, 'ekstraresource1__c' returned null
            at com.sun.el.parser.AstValue.getTarget(AstValue.java:108)
            at com.sun.el.parser.AstValue.isReadOnly(AstValue.java:149)
            at com.sun.el.ValueExpressionImpl.isReadOnly(ValueExpressionImpl.java:248)
            at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.EditableValueRenderer._getUncachedReadOnly(EditableValueRenderer.java:486)
            at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.EditableValueRenderer.cacheReadOnly(EditableValueRenderer.java:416)
            at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.LabeledInputRenderer.beforeEncode(LabeledInputRenderer.java:128)
            at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.render.CoreRenderer.encodeEnd(CoreRenderer.java:340)
    Caused By: java.io.IOException: javax.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Target Unreachable, 'ekstraresource1__c' returned null
            at oracle.adfinternal.view.page.editor.renderkit.PageCustomizableRenderer.encodeAll(PageCustomizableRenderer.java:764)
            at oracle.adf.view.rich.render.RichRenderer.encodeAll(RichRenderer.java:1396)
            at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.render.CoreRenderer.encodeEnd(CoreRenderer.java:341)
            at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.encodeEnd(UIXComponentBase.java:767)
            at javax.faces.component.UIComponent.encodeAll(UIComponent.java:937)
            at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.render.CoreRenderer.encodeChild(CoreRenderer.java:405)
    etc.
    Of course the sandbox should not have been published - but it is - and I am stuck trying to figure out how to somehow undo this mess.
    Is it possible to clean up this mess by diving to the database and removing some rows from the right tables - or perform some other operations undo my mistake?
    Thanks in advance,
    - Tom

    oim version is oim 11gR2 with BP4

  • Configuring ACF2 connector with OIM 11gR2

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on configuring ACF2 connector with OIM 11gr2, In an intermediatory step we need to copy VOYAGER_ID.properties file. The comment against this file is written as: Rename VOYAGER_ID with the name "Voyager server's VOYAGER_ID control file property".
    Can anybody please tell what does this actually mean?
    thanks

    Rename the copied file to match the VOYAGER_ID property. For example, if the target system has VOYAGER_ID = VOYAGE14, then the .properties file should be named VOYAGE14.properties.
    The Voyager reconciliation agent sends a unique identifier value, called VOYAGER_ID, each time a reconciliation event occurs. This value must match the name of the .properties file being used by the topsecret-adv-agent-recon.jar file for reconciliation.

  • Configuring Access Control with OIM 11gR2

    Hi,
    I have to configure Access Control resource with OIM 11gR2. Kindly share relevant pointers.
    Best Regards,
    Varun

    I think this link will be Helpful
    22.5.1 Configuring Oracle Application Access Controls Governor
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E27559_01/dev.1112/e27150/segduties.htm#OMDEV3394

  • Can we use OID 11gR1 with the OAM/OIM 11gR2

    Hi,
    I am installing the IdM 11gR2. As OID does not comes with this pack. so can we use/install the OID which comes with the IdM 11gR1.
    Or is there any other option like OUD.
    Can we integrate the OUD 11gR2 with the OIM/OAM 11gR2 to manage the users/groups.? If yes, please share some document for it.
    Please suggest the best option as we are learning OIM/OIM 11gR2.
    Thanks
    Harry
    Edited by: Harry-Harry on Jan 28, 2013 12:59 AM
    Edited by: Harry-Harry on Jan 28, 2013 1:10 AM

    The latest OID in 11gR1 is 11.1.1.6
    It will support integration with 11gR2 OIM and OAM. Kishore already sent the certification matrix link.
    I am currently using OID 11.1.1.6 in above configuration and works fiine. Any other questions feel free to post your questions.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Loading Missing data

    Hi folks, We are with BW 3.x.  One of the Info Sources (2LIS_11_VAITM) which has sales orders information is fed from SAP R/3 through IDocs, it uses delta machanism. One day we had an issue due to password (user ALEREMOTE), the dataload to BW failed

  • Add new node on vehicle master

    Hello experts, We have many custom fields on vehicle master and we can't add more than 99 custom fields on same screen (SAP restriction) Now I want to add new node (like we have data Entry, Service, Document flow) Once I add new node, we know how to

  • DBMS_XMLSCHEMA commands concurrent executing

    Java class methods execute statements 'DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.registerSchema' and 'DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.deleteSchema' on Oracle 9i through JDBC using Jboss 4.0.0. Several users may request these service simulaneously and the following happens: one or both actions

  • Reproducing a form using Reports

    I have a view and 2 tables. I need data from the view on the top of the form and data from one table on the bottom left and the other table bottom right. The tables are related to the view but not to each other. The view will produce 1 record whereas

  • TS3750 100 page limit on photo books

    How do we plead and beg Apple to get with the times and be more competitive with other photo book companies. The 100 page (50 sheet) limit is so 5 years ago!!!  For those of us who create large albums like an annual family yearbook, this is not enoug