ORA-01438 occurred during "Explain plan"!

Here is my query:
SELECT
rtrim(T1.col_id) Field0
, count(T2.col_id) Field2
, count(T3.col_id) Field3
FROM SS.Table1 T1
LEFT JOIN SS.Table2 T2
ON (rtrim(T1.col_id) = rtrim(T2.col_id))
LEFT JOIN SS.Table3 T3
ON (rtrim(T1.col_id) = rtrim(T2.col_id))
GROUP BY T1.col_id
When I try to explain it plan I receive an error:
"ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allowed for this column"
Can someone explain this?
Thanks for the help in advance
Regards,
Beroetz

Hi,
Not sure how u r getting the explain plan...is it via a third party tool of SQLPLUS. Anyway by looking at the error it doesno tlook like there is a problem in explain plan.Did u run the script and check whether there is any error???There is a datatype error i guess.Please check ur script and the data in it.
Regards
Bharath

Similar Messages

Error occurred during CTM planning run

Hi folks,
Appreciate your co-operations!
I am facing the problem while running the CTM with the profile DEMO2.
CTM Planning Run gives one error and alert.
Error: Error occurred during CTM planning run
Technical Data
Message type__________ A (Cancel)
Message class_________ /SAPAPO/CTM1 (CTM: Messgaes)
Message number________ 401
Problem class_________ 1 (very important)
Number________________ 1
Environment Information
CTM Action____________ G
Message type__________ A
Alert: Internal error has occurred (<!> Segmentation fault)
Technical Data
Message type__________ E (Error)
Message class_________ /SAPAPO/CTM1 (CTM: Messgaes)
Message number________ 571
Message variable 1____ <!> Segmentation fault
Number________________ 1
Environment Information
CTM Action____________ G
Message type__________ C
Log file display
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1363) 'SuperVisor' => Commandline : 4 respected parameters ...
Args:
m0001006
sapgw04
28812935
IDX=1
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(645) 'SuperVisor' * SAP APO CTM Engine [CTM/ctmsvr]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(646) 'SuperVisor' * Copyright u00A9 SAP AG 1993-2009
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(647) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(648) 'SuperVisor' * Version : 7.0_REL SP05, 407661, Nov 25 2009 22:59:47
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(649) 'SuperVisor' * Platform : ntamd64/x64
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(650) 'SuperVisor' * Interface : 2.0
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(651) 'SuperVisor' * Build date : Nov 25 2009 22:59:47 [1259186387]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(652) 'SuperVisor' * Build machine : PWDFM163
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(653) 'SuperVisor' * Latest change : 407661
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(654) 'SuperVisor' * NW release : 7100.0.3300.0
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(655) 'SuperVisor' * Perforce branch: 7.0_REL
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(656) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(676) 'SuperVisor' * Hostname : m0001006
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(677) 'SuperVisor' * OS version : 5.2.3790 (WinServer2003, NTAMD64) SP2.0 (Service Pack 2), SERVER ENTERPRISE TERMINAL SINGLEUSERTS
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(678) 'SuperVisor' * PID : 6768
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(683) 'SuperVisor' * CWD : D:\usr\sap\SC6\DVEBMGS04\log
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(684) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(453) 'SuperVisor' * free disk space: 190433 MB
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(454) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * Memory information:
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * physical memory: 10238 MB total, 6511 MB available [63% free]
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * page file : 73212 MB total, 60889 MB available [83% free]
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * virtual memory : 8388607 MB total, 8388499 MB available [99% free]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(693) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(783) 'SuperVisor' * running in invoke mode
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(871) 'MsgMgr' <RFC> RfcPing(RFC_HANDLE=1) received in thread#6912
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(692) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PARAM_SET' for sending of parameters/options
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(703) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PARAM_GET' for receiving of parameters/options
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(712) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PROGRESS' for progress informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(721) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_MESSAGE' for messages
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(730) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_RESULT' for (intermediate) result informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(739) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_SYSINFO' for system informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(748) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PERFINFO' for performance informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1269) 'MsgMgr' <RFC> skipping empty profile value [GENERAL] sPROFILE_CUST_ID
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1835) 'MsgMgr'
Sender/Receiver RFC_HANDLE#1:
<RFC> * RFC connection attributes:
Own Host : m0001006
Partner Host: m0001006
Destination : OPTSERVER_CTM01
Program Name: SAPLRCC_COMM_ENGINE
SystemNr : 04 SystemId : SC6
Client : 700 User : MBATCHA
Language : E ISO Language: EN
CodePage : 1100 Partner CP : 1100
Kernel Rel. : 701 Partner Rel.: 701
Own Release : 711 CPIC ConvId : 28812935
Own Type : E PartnerType : 3
Trace : RFC Role : S
<RFC> * RFC statistic information:
number of calls : 7
number of received data: 10569
number of sent data : 1349
overall reading time : 9073
overall writing time : 162
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1110) 'SuperVisor' * Starting MainScript ...
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1445) 'SuperVisor'
***************************** OPTSVR - OPTIONS ***************************** *
[CTM_PROFILE]
nCTMENGINEPACKAGESIZE = 500
sCOMPONENT = SCM
sCTMLOGFILE = ctm.DEMO2.0000_0001.20091201043758.log
sCTMLOGFLAG = 0
sCTMPROFILE = DEMO2
sRELEASE = 700
[general]
bUNICODE = true
nSLOT_MAXIMUM = 1
nSLOT_MINIMUM = 1
nSLOT_RESERVED = 1
sAPO_RELEASE = 700
sAPPLICATION = CTM
sExeDir = d:\apoopt\ctm\bin
sExeName = ctmsvr.exe
sHOST = m0001006
sInvokeMode = invoke
sLANGU = E
sMANDT = 700
sPRODUCT_NAME = APO
sPRODUCT_PATCHLEVEL = 0001
sPRODUCT_RELEASE = 700
sPROFILE = DEMO2
sSESSION = tju5Bmz21}6WVG0Sn6pv3W
sSYSTEM = SC6
sUNAME = MBATCHA
[init]
sSECTION0001 = INIT
sSECTION0002 = GENERAL
sSECTION0003 = PASSPORT
sSECTION0004 = CTM_PROFILE
[PASSPORT]
bIS_REMOTE = false
nACTION_TYPE = 1
nSERVICE = 1
sACTION = /SAPAPO/CTMB
sPRE_SYSID = SC6
sSYSID = SC6
sTRANSID = 2205DEDE7A5BF16DA07D001CC46CF90E
sUSERID = MBATCHA
************************** OPTSVR OPTIONS - END **************************** *
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 802 to OutputInterface from []
 04:37:59 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->download
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 806 to OutputInterface from [MG]
 04:37:59 ctm_modelgen.cpp(166) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:37:59 ctm_modelgen.cpp(167) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::download
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1110) 'MsgMgr' renaming tracefile
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1111) 'MsgMgr' old name: optsvr_trace20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1112) 'MsgMgr' new name: ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
logfile reopened : Tue Dec 01 04:37:59 2009
logfile name : ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PRDAT_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PLPAR_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_LOC_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PPM_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_TRANS_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_RES_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_SSTCK_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_CAL_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PLPER_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_INCMD_RFC_READ
 04:38:03 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:03 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_DEM_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_SUP_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_UCMAP_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:04 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 810 to OutputInterface from [MG]
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(735) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::download done
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(736) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(750) 'SuperVisor' <M> Returning from module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->download = success [ctx size : 1]
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(692) 'SuperVisor' <SCR> Starting script 'CTM Solve' with 9.22337e+012 seconds left
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(692) 'SuperVisor' <SCR> Starting script 'CTM Match' with 9.22337e+012 seconds left
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(102) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(103) 'SuperVisor' statistics:
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(104) 'SuperVisor' number of demands: 7
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(105) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(107) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(108) 'SuperVisor' parameters:
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(118) 'SuperVisor' time continuous planning
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(125) 'SuperVisor' backward scheduling
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(184) 'SuperVisor' CBCLP enabled
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(457) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CtmEngine' [7]->run
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(523) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(524) 'SuperVisor' EM::execute for packet 1
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(1570) 'SuperVisor' EM::execute for packet 1 done
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(1571) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(750) 'SuperVisor' <M> Returning from module 'CtmEngine' [7]->run = success [ctx size : 1]
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->upload
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(1097) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(1098) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::upload of packet 1
<e> 04:38:05 ctmsvr_script.cpp(229) 'SuperVisor' <!> STRING EXCEPTION : <!> Segmentation fault
 04:38:05 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1166) 'MsgMgr' Current check values:
[CHECK_EQUAL]
[CHECK_UPPERBOUND]
nPEAK_MEMORY_NTAMD64 = 45344
[CHECK_LOWERBOUND]
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1209) 'MsgMgr' Performance values:
bSuccess false
nCPU_TIME 0
nPEAK_MEMORY 45344
nPEAK_VIRTUAL_BYTES 141844
nREAL_TIME 6
tracefile ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1235) 'MsgMgr' Performance Monitor values:
ENGINE_VERSION 7.0_REL SP05, 407661, Nov 25 2009 22:59:47
nCPU_TIME 0
nHD_FREESPACE 190433
nPEAK_MEMORY 45344
nPEAK_VIRTUAL_BYTES 141844
nREAL_TIME 6
 04:38:05 optsvr_dsr.cpp(96) 'MsgMgr' <writeDSRdata> tracing not active => no DSR written
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1256) 'SuperVisor'
Finished->FAILED ...
 04:38:05 core_memmgr.cpp(564) 'MsgMgr' transferring memory of heap 6912 to main heap
 04:38:05 core_memmgr.cpp(606) 'MsgMgr' finished transfer of heap 6912
 04:38:05 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1835) 'MsgMgr'
Sender/Receiver RFC_HANDLE#1:
<RFC> * RFC connection attributes:
Own Host : m0001006
Partner Host: m0001006
Destination : OPTSERVER_CTM01
Program Name: SAPLRCC_COMM_ENGINE
SystemNr : 04 SystemId : SC6
Client : 700 User : MBATCHA
Language : E ISO Language: EN
CodePage : 1100 Partner CP : 1100
Kernel Rel. : 701 Partner Rel.: 701
Own Release : 711 CPIC ConvId : 28812935
Own Type : E PartnerType : 3
Trace : RFC Role : S
<RFC> * RFC statistic information:
number of calls : 116
number of received data: 420457
number of sent data : 39262
overall reading time : 5.30093e+006
overall writing time : 3831
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1332) 'MsgMgr'
OptimizeServer says GOOD BYE
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Khadar

Hi Khadar,
1) The information you have provided is the CTM optimiser log.
Run the job in background and in sm37 and click on job log &
analyse the exact error happened. In case if you are not able
to do, please provide the error log.
2) Check the livecache is stable in its operations when the job
runs (check with basis team)
3) Run consistency check for master data before CTM run
4) Check for any struck queues and clear those and rerun
5) If you feel more inconsistencies in system, run livecache
consistency and rerun CTM run
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Error occurred during deployment plan generation

When I was publish my project i have a below error
An exception occurred when deploying the database for the application. An error occurred during deployment plan generation. Deployment cannot continue.
Visual Studio 2011
Microsoft SQL 2008
Firewall on server is off

A web application? Or a desktop application?
Yann -
LightSwitch Central -
Click here for FREE Themes, Controls, Types and Commands
Please click "Mark as Answer" if a reply answers your question. Please click
"Vote as Helpful" , if you find a reply helpful.
By doing this you'll help others to find answers faster.

RMAN backup failes with ORA-19624 occurred during call to DBMS_BACKUP_RESTO

RMAN backup up failes with following errors. It works some times and then failes. When it failes then if i un install and reinstall Oralec agent and Backup cliet then it start working OK for few days and then again start getting error. See the messages below...
Recovery Manager: Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production
RMAN-06005: connected to target database: MIMSDEVH (DBID=3525230908)
RMAN-06008: connected to recovery catalog database
RMAN> RUN { 2> execute script tapelevel0; 3> }
RMAN-03021: executing script: tapelevel0
RMAN-03022: compiling command: allocate
RMAN-03023: executing command: allocate
RMAN-03026: error recovery releasing channel resources
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03015: error occurred in stored script tapelevel0
RMAN-03007: retryable error occurred during execution of command: allocate
RMAN-07004: unhandled exception during command execution on channel ch00
RMAN-10035: exception raised in RPC: ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name:
ORA-19557: device error, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name:
ORA-27000: skgfqsbi: failed to initialize storage subsystem (SBT) layer
ORA-19511: SBT error = 4110, errno = 0, BACKUP_DIR environment variable is not set
RMAN-10031: ORA-19624 occurred during call to DBMS_BACKUP_RESTORE.DEVICEALLOCATE
Send me some solution...

hi,
what is your backup script
can you post back the result of the command
show all;
from the rman command prompt
regards
Alan

ORA-01745 when running Explain Plan

Hello everybody,
I would like to know what is the best way to report a bug. In fact I believe just found one and I would like it fixed. I am using the latest version of SQLDeveloper on WinXP that uses its own JDK.
To replicate the bug it's very easy, just try to do an explain plan of the following query:
SELECT * FROM scott.emp
where empno = &&emp_nr;and the "*ORA-01745: invalid host/bind variable name*" error appears. Since the query executes properly, but the Explain plan errors out, I believe this could be a bug.
Thanks,
Paolo

Gary,
thanks a lot for your feedback.
I have found this weird behaviour, because I was trying to avoid another one. In fact I tried using the substitution variable syntax instead of the bind variable syntax in SQLDeveloper, especially to avoid the issues coming from automatic data conversions.
For example, if I run the following query using the bind variable syntax (passing SYSDATE as the parameter value):
SELECT *
FROM scott.emp
WHERE hiredate BETWEEN TRUNC(:p_eff_date,'yyyy')
AND TRUNC(add_months(:p_eff_date,12),'yyyy') - 1;it will go in error with "*ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected DATE got NUMBER*", because the filter predicate will be converted automatically as follows:
TRUNC(TO_NUMBER(:P_EFF_DATE),TO_NUMBER('yyyy'))<=TRUNC(ADD_MONTHS(:P_EFF_DATE,12),'fmyyyy')-1This behaviour is visible by running the explain plan on the above query. Isn't that TO_NUMBER(:P_EFF_DATE),TO_NUMBER('yyyy') a little bit too wrong? Note that the second occurrence of the P_EFF_DATE parameter does not get converted. Can't this "automatic conversion" behaviour be disabled somehow?
Due to this weird issue I tried to use the substitution variable syntax, but the main issue with the single ampersand is that you have to enter the value of the parameter as many times as the parameter is referenced in the query and you can imagine that with big queries written by other people this is not so easy.
Is there another way to pass parameters to a query in the SQL Worksheet? How can I "use literals rather than variables" as you suggest? Do you mean NOT using parameters at all?
Thanks,
Paolo

Exception occured during invocation of JCA binding ORA-01403: no data found ORA-06512: at line 1

Dear Legends,
My requirement is to call store procedure from BPEL. So for I created a BPEL with 2 assign activity and 1 Invoke activity to Invoke the DB adapter. After Deploying I tested the process but it shows the following error:
<bpelFault><faultType>0</faultType><bindingFault xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension"><part name="summary"><summary>Exception occured when binding was invoked.
Exception occured during invocation of JCA binding: "JCA Binding execute of Reference operation 'DB_SBL_SPROCS1' failed due to: Interaction processing error.
Error while processing the execution of the SIEBEL.PORTAL_SPROCS.ACP_CONREGISTRATIONLOOKUP_WRAP API interaction.
An error occurred while processing the interaction for invoking the SIEBEL.PORTAL_SPROCS.ACP_CONREGISTRATIONLOOKUP_WRAP API. Cause: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-06512: at line 1
Check to ensure that the XML containing parameter data matches the parameter definitions in the XSD. This exception is considered not retriable, likely due to a modelling mistake. To classify it as retriable instead add property nonRetriableErrorCodes with value "-1403" to your deployment descriptor (i.e. weblogic-ra.xml). To auto retry a retriable fault set these composite.xml properties for this invoke: jca.retry.interval, jca.retry.count, and jca.retry.backoff. All properties are integers.
The invoked JCA adapter raised a resource exception.
Please examine the above error message carefully to determine a resolution.
</summary></part><part name="detail"><detail>ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-06512: at line 1
</detail></part><part name="code"><code>1403</code></part></bindingFault></bpelFault></fault><faultType>
<message>0</message></faultType></messages></details></event><event sid="BpPrc0.1" cat="2" n="16" date="2013-08-08T05:39:39.121-04:00" type="4"><message>"BPELFault" has not been caught by a catch block.</message></event><event sid="BpPrc0.1" cat="2" n="17" date="2013-08-08T05:39:39.270-04:00" type="3"><message>The transaction was rolled back. The work performed for bpel instance "960968" was rolled back, but the audit trail has been saved for this instance.If this is a sync request, please resubmit the request from the client. If it is an async request, please recover from the recovery console by resubmitting the invoke message.</message></event></audit-trail>
What does the above error says?
1. Whether concern Grant or Execute Privileges is not properly provided to the user?
2. Is there any Dangling Privileges are prevailing?
3. Is that the Store Procedure to be Handled with an Error Handling by means of Exception?
4. Is that I have been giving wrong test data?
5. Is that No data being existing in the Procedure?
6. Is that anything related to XA and NON-XA Data Source?
Any kind of help would be much appreciated. Thanks in Advance.
Thanks,
Karthik

Can you check the following ?
a. Hopefully the when you execute the procedure using sql tool it works fine and returns data.
b. Is there any input parameter available for procedure ?
c. IF yes, is the parameter is mapped with the procedure parameter and populated with value before calling the procedure ?
d. In the audit trial, you can see from the invoke activity to see whether the parameter is populated with value or not ?
e. Check the input parameter by executing the procedure with sql tool to see whether this request is receiving any data in return or not ?
Thanks,
Vijay

Error during Compression of an InfoCube (ORA-01438)

Hi all,
I am getting an error while trying to compress a request on an infocube,
I have attached the logs from the compression;
START cond CUBE BADR_C01 at 105833 on 20080606 maxreqid      2740 maxcnsid         0 refpoint update + NO NULL ELIM
The primary index on the E table was deleted
System error: ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision a
System error: llows for this column
System error: CONDENSE_FACTTABLE-5- ERROR:1438-
Collapse terminated: Data target BADR_C01, from to                                              2740
I have searched the SDN and OSS Notes for the ORA-1438 error but cannot find anything helpful.
Has anyone else come across this during a compression.
By the way, the compression on another cube works okay, just seems to be this cube and it is the first request I am trying to compress on this cube.
We are on BW 3.5 with an Oracle DB release 9.2.0.7.0.
Points awarded for any helpful or successful answers,
Thanks,
Shane.

Hi Viki and Shambhu,
thanks for your quick replies.
Viki, on our TableSpaces we have the following percentage used, do you know what to check?
Table Space         Percentage Used
PSAPBBP          82
PSAPBBP640     69
PSAPBBPUSR   15
PSAPTEMP        0
PSAPUNDO        60
SYSTEM             78
Shambhu, I have looked at the e table in SE11 and there is the following indexes ;
Index using Dimension BADR_C01P
Index using Dimension BADR_C01T
Index using Dimension BADR_C01U
Index using Dimension BADR_C011
Index using Dimension BADR_C012
Index using Dimension BADR_C013
Index using Dimension BADR_C014
Index using Dimension BADR_C015
Index using Dimension BADR_C016
Index using Dimension BADR_C017
Index using Dimension BADR_C018
Index using Dimension BADR_C019
Index using Dimension BADR_C01A
Index using Dimension BADR_C01B
Index using Dimension BADR_C01C
Non-Unique Index (Key Fields) for Table /BIC/EBADR
Is there anything else to check here???
Thanks for your help,
Shane.

Ora-01039 - Insuffficient priviliges - Tuning using Explain Plan

In a TEST instance, i am trying (as the APPS user) on a 9.2.0.5 DB (11.5.10.2) trying to run an explain plan on a query but keep getting the 'ora-01039 - Insuffficient privileges on underlying objects of view' error message.
I have granted 'select any dictionary' to both the APPS and APPLSYS users - but this does not seem to enable the explain plan to work.
Could someone please shed some light on this?
Tks

You seem to be doin an Explain Plan on a query against a custom view against non-Apps objects.
Explain Plan needs to be able to "see" the underlying tables (in that other schema).
See :
SQL> create view his_cntry_vw as select * from my_cntry;
View created.
SQL> grant select on his_cntry_vw to abc;
Grant succeeded.
SQL> connect abc/abc
Connected.
SQL> create synonym his_cntry_vw for otheruser.his_cntry_vw;
Synonym created.
SQL> select * from his_cntry_vw;
GRP_I CNTRY
ABC Z9
XYZ UK
SQL> explain plan for select * from his_cntry_vw;
explain plan for select * from his_cntry_vw
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01039: insufficient privileges on underlying objects of the view
SQL> REM THIS IS THE FIX :
SQL> connect otheruser/otheruser
Connected.
SQL> grant select on my_cntry to abc;
Grant succeeded.
SQL> connect abc/abc
Connected.
SQL> explain plan for select * from his_cntry_vw;
Explained.
SQL>Hemant K Chitale
http://hemantoracledba.blogspot.com

An exception occurred during planning process

Hi All,
We are working on Opportunity Planning. as part of it we have configured,planning area, planning level, BPS Lay out & planning profile in BI. This planning profile is assigned to relevant transaction type in CRM 7.0 system.
We have created opportunity with the transaction type for which we have assigned planning profile. when I select the planning in opportunity, I am getting the below message.
An exception occurred during planning process
Can any please let me know why this is happening and help me out in resolving the issue.
Thanks in advance for your reply
Regards,
JM.

Hi JM,
please check trx. st22 and try to activate BSP_WD_EXCEPTION_DISPLAY in trx. saab.
Best regards,
Caíque Escaler

Error occured during budget check while planning in network activity

Dear All,
i have created a project with 4 WBSE. i have assigned budget to one of these WBSE and released that project. than i want to do planning in next WBSE this is giving error while saving this planning as Error occured during budget check, see cost.
i have created user status for budgeting like if we have not budgeted than WBS is not able to release. i have added availability control as Forbidden while not budgeted but this not effective.
please suggest me some thing to remove this problem
thanks
Sunil

hi,
In WBS you can Plan and budget to group WBS , the below wbs will consume budget form top.
Proj>WBS1(Group WBS- Plan/Budget) it is applicable for below all wbs elements say WBS2>WBS3
When you are determining Hierarchy you should create WBS in same levels then only you can allocate Budget.
If you wan to allocate budget for WBS2 and WBS3 separately.
Proj
WBS1
WBS2                    WBS3
     WBS2A                   WBS3A
          WBS2B                    WBS3B
               WBS2C                         WBS3C
Proj>WBS1 (it will no more act as Group wbs element) then you can directly plan and budget for below wbs elements WBS2 and WBS3.
Below hierarchy will consume budget from as displayed above.
Note: In you case as per my understanding return budget make zero, then plan and budget the same it will work.
Thanks and regards
Sadiq

ORA-01039: insufficient privileges... on EXPLAIN PLAN but OK when run

I get
ORA-01039: insufficient privileges on underlying objects of the viewwhen I use EXPLAIN PLAN but if I actually run the SQL it is fine!
SQL> explain plan for select * from ifsinfo.gscdb_xref;
explain plan for select * from ifsinfo.gscdb_xref
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01039: insufficient privileges on underlying objects of the view
SQL>select * from ifsinfo.gscdb_xref;
GSCDB_COMPANY                  COMPANY                        VARCHAR2
GSCDB_COMPANY                  NAME                           VARCHAR2
GSCDB_COMPANY                  ADDRESS1                       VARCHAR2
GSCDB_COMPANY                  ADDRESS2                       VARCHAR2
GSCDB_COMPANY                  ZIP_CODE                       VARCHAR2
GSCDB_COMPANY                  CITY                           VARCHAR2
GSCDB_COMPANY                  COUNTY                         VARCHAR2
GSCDB_COMPANY                  STATE                          VARCHAR2
GSCDB_COMPANY                  COUNTRY_DB                     VARCHAR2
GSCDB_COMPANY                  GSCDB_LAST_UPDATE              VARCHAR2
GSCDB_CUSTOMER                 CUSTOMER_ID                    VARCHAR2
GSCDB_CUSTOMER                 NAME                           VARCHAR2
GSCDB_CUSTOMER                 ADDRESS_ID                     VARCHAR2
:

...in which case (providing the SQLs in question are SELECT statements) you may be better off with DBMS_SQL.PARSE rather than explain plan.

ORA-01039 on attempt to perform EXPLAIN PLAN

Folks,
I'm running a query below on Ora10G and getting "ORA-01039: insufficient privileges on underlying objects of the view":
EXPLAIN PLAN INTO DBO.plan_table FOR SELECT last_analyzed FROM all_tables WHERE table_name='MyTable'
I'm running under a user TST account and I did "grant all privileges to TST" to make sure I did not forget any privileges. This did not help. I also tried to explicitly "grant insert on plan_table to TST" and "grant select on all_users to TST" but that did not help either. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Vladimir.

To perform such execution plans on data dictionnary, you need to have the DBA role or have the "SELECT ANY DICTIONARY" privilege (if your O7_DICTIONARY_ACCESSIBILITY parameter is at the default value of FALSE. Otherwise, "SELECT ANY TABLE" should be enough). I don't haver 10G installed, but that should hold true, according to what I found on http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_9013.htm#i2155015.
Daniel

Planning object structure ATP_ALL: "Error occured during activation"

Hi,
I'm working with pl object structure ATP_ALL in the IDES (SCM 5.0) system. Problem is I get an error saying "Error occured during activation" when I try to activate it.
Reason I was trying to activate it is because I first deactivated it. The reason for that was that it did not work for product allocations in GATP. But somehow it cannot be activated again...
I have checked all objects in the pl object structure using tr code RSD1; they are all active. I have also program /sapapo/ts_d_objects_copy to make sure that all objects are activated. Trying again I still get the same error.
Any ideas?
Best regards,
Ozgur

atoub24 wrote:
Does anybody else get this? My facetime worked perfectly fine before and all of a sudden I started to get this message. Ive tried logging in from a different facetime account and it tells me the same thing. It won't let me make a new account, it just takes me to a white screen. Any suggestions. Thanks and Happy Holidays.
Welcome to Discussions, atoub24
FaceTime need be activated only once. You should not need to change the account info once FaceTime is working.
Restarting your iPod may eliminate the error message: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1430
If not, see http://www.apple.com/support/ipodtouch/facetime/
If nothing resolves the problem, take the iPod back to your retailer for service or replacement.
Mac Pro Quad Core (Early 2009) 2.93Ghz Mac OS X (10.6.5); MacBook Pro (13 inch, Mid 2009) 2.26GHz (10.6.5)
LED Cinema Display; G4 PowerBook 1.67GHz (10.4.11); iBookSE 366MHz (10.3.9); External iSight; iPod4touch4.2.1

Error during Network Planning (SAPSQL_INVALID_FIELDNAME)

Hi,
During Interactive planning in SNP when releasing the forecast to network (thru transacction /sapapo/snp01) we are getting an runtime error "SAPSQL_INVALID_FIELDNAME"
Please help. Error analysis appearing in dump is mentioned below
An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
    The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SEMANTICS', was
     not caught in
procedure "SELID_GET" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
    Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
    exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
    The reason for the exception is:
    An Open SQL clause was specified dynamically. The contained field name
    "SEL_9AACTNAME" does not exist in any of the database tables from the FROM
     clause.

Hi Aparna,
Yes you are right. The forecast is already released to SNP and the team is now doing network planning. We are facing the error here.
Our technical person has done the analysis and it seems that its due to some Local objectcs that are implemented in system.
Will update once the issue is resolved.
Thanks

EXPLAIN PLAN with pluggable mapping

Dear Folks,
I have a mapping with a pluggable mapping included. When I try to get the EXPLAIN PLAN TREE I receive an error: 'ORA-00904: "FULLPACKAGENAME"."CONSTANT_0_SITUATION_1":invalid identifier'.
The EXPLAIN PLAN REPORT says in the first line: Error: cannot fetch last explain plan from PLAN_TABLE
When I search for 'CONSTANT_0_SITUATION_1' I can find things like:
(SELECT
"WH_JOIN_GSMNMBR_PORTINGDATA"."GSS_VOI_ID" "FACT1_ID",
"WH_JOIN_GSMNMBR_PORTINGDATA"."BEGINDATE" "FACT1_BEGINDATE",
"WH_JOIN_GSMNMBR_PORTINGDATA"."ENDDATE" "FACT1_ENDDATE",
"INGRP2"."FACT1_MIN_BEGINDATE" "FACT1_MIN_BEGINDATE",
"INGRP2"."FACT1_MAX_ENDDATE" "FACT1_MAX_ENDDATE",
FULLPACKAGENAME."CONSTANT_0_SITUATION_1" "SITUATION_1"
What is 'FULLPACKAGENAME'???
I can validate my mapping and this is OK. I checked the pluggable mapping again and again, all seems to be right. I can run the mapping and it works. Just need to tune it.
I'm working with OWB 11.1 on a 10.2.g DB
Can please someone help me?
Greetings
S.

Hi,
if you generate the sql in the mapping editor, the sql may not run directly. FULLPACKAGENAME will be replaced my the mapping name during deployment. The constants you define in the mapping will be pl/sql-variables of that package.
To make the sql work, you have to replace the FULLPACKAGENAME.xxx expressions with correct values manually.
Do you have the most recent patch installed? In owb 10gr2 the values from the constants as well as the default values of the mappings are set correctly from version 10.2.0.3 on.
Regards,
Carsten.

ORA-01438 occurred during "Explain plan"!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for