Ora-12801 with ora - 00600 urgent

Hi dear
I just migrate my dataabse from oracle 8.1.7.4 to oracle 10g release 2
i m getting the error
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [xtycsr3], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
when i save the new record it's work fine but when i save the record the modify mode it give the above error
i m using form 6i
O/s win 2000 server
Kindly suggest the solution urgently i m on production database
Regards
Tarun Mittal

Symptoms:
Internal Error may occur (ORA-600)
ORA-600 [xtycsr3]
Related To:
Parallel Query (PQO)
Description
Select with GROUP BY may result in ORA-600[xtycsr3]
on a parallel slave process, if select list contains
a PLSQL function call on aggregation operators.
Eg:
SELECT 1, b.x, xty_func( max(1),SUM(100))
FROM xty b
GROUP BY 1, b.x;
The full bug text (if published) can be seen at Bug 2459355
This link will not work for UNPUBLISHED bugs.

Similar Messages

Ora 12801 with rep 1401

dear all
how are you ???
i am just need some help cuz i have an application when the genarate report an error accuorred says :
Rep -1401: ' report_name' fatal PL/SQL error accurred
Ora - 12801 : error signaled in parallel query server
Notcied that both of those erroe desplayed in the same masg
so if anybody can help me
Thank you

Anyway thank you for your help but i actually i dosent solve this problem till now but lets say that we we have only one error which is error
****ORA - 12801 : error signaled in parallel query server ****
How can i solve it in the database???
Thank you very much

ORA-12801 and ORA-30563

Hi,
I have a mapping failed with the two error codes. Does anyone know what the cause maybe? Thanks.
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P002
ORA-30563: outer join operator (+) not allowed in select-list
The failing happened at a point where I have an outer join statement, where one of the join condition uses a function like
...where a.sup_id=b.supid_lookup(pc,sc) (+) and a.plant_code=b.plant_code (+)
I don't see these error when run under debug and the join did not get me the data neither.

well, like the error sais, the (+) is in the SELECT list.
If the error is in fact raised from the WHERE clause, you might to wrap the function call into an inline view. What I don't get from you example, is the meaning of 'b'. you seem to treat it both as a table and as a package containing the function 'supid_lookup'
select * from tab1 a
left outer join (select b.*,supid_lookup(b.pc,b.sc) sup_id from tab2 b) v using (sup_id,plant_code)
But without a description of your tables, I might be making some wrong assumptions.
Cheers

ORA - 12801 and ORA - 01652 ?

Hello gurus,
I was running a query on Oracle 11g RAC. One of the table has about 7 billions records
Here is the error i got
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server
ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace TEMPAny idea, what could be wrong ??
Thank you!! Appriciate it !!

Dear user642297,
In order to get rid of that error, you need to increase the temporary tablespace called TEMP and i think it is the default one for your situation.
You can also check below link;
http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_ora_12801_parallel_query.htm
But there is a comment that says increase the sort_area_size, don't do that since you are running on 11g. Instead of that parameter, increase or decrease the PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET.
Hope That Helps.
Ogan

ORA-22816 with INSERT, UPDATE URGENT!!!!!

=8-)
HI.
I have a big problem.
With a forms, 6.0.4.10, i am connetting with 8.0.5,
during UPDATE or INSERT, in this table ther are 18000 rows,
i recive ORA-22816.
The parameter DML Returning Value , is setting NO.
Now, next week i'll install this system, and i have a
big problem ....
PLEASE HELP ME !!!!!!!!!!!
Luca
null

Luca (guest) wrote:
: =8-)
: HI.
: I have a big problem.
: With a forms, 6.0.4.10, i am connetting with 8.0.5,
: during UPDATE or INSERT, in this table ther are 18000 rows,
: i recive ORA-22816.
: The parameter DML Returning Value , is setting NO.
: Now, next week i'll install this system, and i have a
: big problem ....
: PLEASE HELP ME !!!!!!!!!!!
: Luca
I have resolve the problem.
In my table is here a LONG ROW.
But, why the form using returnin in a table with LONG.
null

ORA-01555 with ORA-02063 when submitted Concurrent Requests

Hello,
My development team has reported some CM Requests got failed with some errors.When i checked the request log file i saw :java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number with name "" too small ORA-02063: preceding line from EIHFDM .Could you please help me out this to solve this issue.
We are on Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bit
Application 11.5.10
I have checked the UNDO Parameter values
ACTUAL UNDO SIZE (MEGS) UNDO RETENTION (Secs)                OPTIMAL UNDO RETENTION (Secs)
                                 304849                               40000                4860
Thanks,
Prabhat.

Hi Asif,
This is a customized program.
I have checked the UNDO Parameter values
SQL> show parameter undo
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
_in_memory_undo                 boolean     TRUE
_undo_debug_usage              integer     2
undo_management                 string      AUTO
undo_retention                       integer     40000
undo_tablespace                    string      APPS_UNDOTS
SQL>
ACTUAL UNDO SIZE (MEGS) UNDO RETENTION (Secs)                OPTIMAL UNDO RETENTION (Secs)
                                 304849                               40000                4860

Ora -07445 with ora-03135 error

Hi,
Sorry for asking questiob about this generic error, i shouldd contact oracle support for this. But for some tecnical reason metalink SR request page is offline. May be i get some help from you guys.
For last three days i have been getting ora-07445 error at same time, by going through the trace file it shows a sql statment fired from sql developer which caused the error.
detailed error as follows....
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kprball()+684] [SIGSEGV]
[Address not mapped to object] [0x000000238] [] []
ORA-03135: connection lost contact
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks and Regards
Jafar

Hi,
version - oracle 10g on solaria 9.
Metalink is working fine but for rasing TAR page is offline.
A similar issue in Oracle 10g Release 2 is seems to be fixed in 10.2.0.4 How this was fixed, by appying patch.
Thanks
Jafar

Apply process is aborting with:ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query

hi,
We created a queue of a specific type, capture and apply process on the queue. Then we started the queue capture and the apply process. The problem is that the apply process is getting enabled and with in moments going into aborted state. wea re getting the follwoing error:
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kwqiceval:anyconv], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Any idea what could have gone wrong?
scripts:
exec dbms_aqadm.create_queue_table(queue_table=>'qt_anc',queue_payload_type=>'type_anc',multiple_consumers=> true, compatible => '9.0');
exec dbms_aqadm.create_queue (queue_name => 'q_anc',queue_table=>'qt_anc');
EXEC DBMS_AQADM.START_QUEUE (queue_name => 'q_anc');
DECLARE
emp_rule_name_dml VARCHAR2(300);
emp_rule_name_ddl VARCHAR2(300);
BEGIN
DBMS_STREAMS_ADM.ADD_TABLE_RULES(
table_name => 'ops.t_anc',
streams_type => 'capture',
streams_name => 'capture_anc',
queue_name => 'strmadmin.q_anc',
include_dml => true,
include_ddl => false,
source_database => null,
dml_rule_name => emp_rule_name_dml,
ddl_rule_name => emp_rule_name_ddl);
DBMS_APPLY_ADM.SET_ENQUEUE_DESTINATION(
rule_name => emp_rule_name_dml,
destination_queue_name => 'strmadmin.q_anc');
END;
DECLARE
emp_rule_name_dml VARCHAR2(300);
emp_rule_name_ddl VARCHAR2(300);
BEGIN
DBMS_STREAMS_ADM.ADD_TABLE_RULES(
table_name => 'ops.t_anc',
streams_type => 'apply',
streams_name => 'apply_anc',
queue_name => 'strmadmin.q_anc',
include_dml => true,
include_ddl => false,
source_database => null,
dml_rule_name => emp_rule_name_dml,
ddl_rule_name => emp_rule_name_ddl);
DBMS_APPLY_ADM.SET_ENQUEUE_DESTINATION(
rule_name => emp_rule_name_dml,
destination_queue_name => 'strmadmin.q_anc');
END;
BEGIN
DBMS_APPLY_ADM.START_APPLY(
apply_name => 'apply_anc');
END;
BEGIN
DBMS_CAPTURE_ADM.START_CAPTURE(
capture_name => 'capture_anc');
END;
/

Hello
The above configuration is never supported. The implicit capture expects the queue payload to be SYS.ANYDATA and same with implicit apply also.
However you can use Streams Messaging capability to achieve this. You need to wrap the messages with SYS.ANYDATA for this to work. The implicit capture uses a persistent logminer session to generate LCRs and it then wraps it with SYS.ANYDATA and enqueues into the capture queue, it then propagated to apply queue. You can generate LCRs and wrap it with SYS.ANYDATA and then enqueue into the capture queue then apply can recognise the messages.
Here is an example on creating LCRs (tested in 10g):
CREATE TABLE lcr_test (col1 NUMBER);
DECLARE
     l_lcr SYS.LCR$_ROW_RECORD;
BEGIN
     l_lcr :=
SYS.LCR$_ROW_RECORD.CONSTRUCT
     source_database_name=>SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV','DB_NAME'),
     command_type=>'INSERT',
     object_owner=>USER,
     object_name=>'LCR_TEST'
     l_lcr.ADD_COLUMN('new','col1',SYS.AnyData.ConvertNumber(99));
     l_lcr.EXECUTE(TRUE);
     COMMIT;
END;
SELECT * FROM lcr_test;
Converting to SYS.ANYDATA:
DECLARE
     l_lcr SYS.LCR$_ROW_RECORD;
     l_anydata SYS.ANYDATA;
BEGIN
     l_lcr :=
SYS.LCR$_ROW_RECORD.CONSTRUCT
     source_database_name=>SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV','DB_NAME'),
     command_type=>'INSERT',
     object_owner=>USER,
     object_name=>'LCR_TEST'
     l_lcr.ADD_COLUMN('new','col1',SYS.AnyData.ConvertNumber(99));
     l_anydata:=SYS.ANYDATA.ConvertObject(l_lcr);
     ENQ_PROC(l_anydata);
     COMMIT;
END;
Thanks,
Rijesh

Urgent, ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000

Hi Guys,
I am using Oracle 9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 with Windows 2000 Server.
I have just upgrade my database from 8i to 9i. I am facing this problem in a lot of queries in my application after upgrade. I tried to searched out but unable to find the reason yet.
Is there any parameter which i should /should not use? Or need to change any parameter.
Oracle Error Occured: ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
Thanks in advance.
Brgs,
Hassan

Well, the error stack should be displayed along with the 12801 error.
If not, look the comment for the error I posted above: use event 10397 to display the actual error.ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10397 trace name context forever, level 1'; and if the error raises, then you'll get the source message, not the PQ message.
See note 21281.1 on Metalink.
Regards,
Yoann.

Data Load is erroring out with ORA-12801 ORA-01031

Hello,
I am having Oracle 11.1.0.7 on AIX and we are loading data through Informatica.
There are 7 tables in the database that are big and we enabled parallelism with the degree of 2.
When we run the informatica session for loading data the session is failing with the error -
Severity     Timestamp     Node     Thread     Message Code     Message
ERROR     5/10/2011 4:33:09 PM     node01_wpg1pedw001     POST-SESS     TM_6159     An error occurred executing the stored procedure.
TM_6159 [4294965496] [
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
ORA-06512: at "POL_ODS.DELETE_LATEST_POLICY_1", line 4
ORA-06512: at line 2
Database driver error...
Function Name : ExecuteSP
Oracle Fatal Error
Database driver error...
Function Name : ExecuteSP
Oracle Fatal Error]Trace file is giving me this output -
=====================
PARSING IN CURSOR #3 len=152 dep=1 uid=73 oct=7 lid=73 tim=2806650507771 hv=2692072913 ad='700000b32b206c0' sqlid='835qyt2h7bjfj'
DELETE FROM LIENHOLDER WHERE LIEN_POLICY_12_SEGMENT_ID IN (SELECT POL_SEG_12_ID FROM POLICY12SEGMENT WHERE POLICY_ID IN (SELECT POLICY_ID FROM DEL_POL))
END OF STMT
PARSE #3:c=20000,e=31779,p=0,cr=181,cu=3,mis=1,r=0,dep=1,og=1,plh=449661848,tim=2806650507771
kxfpgsg
        Error 12801 encountered
EXEC #3:c=10000,e=111135,p=0,cr=28,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=1,og=1,plh=449661848,tim=2806650618906
ERROR #3:err=12801 tim=2806650618906
STAT #3 id=1 cnt=0 pid=0 pos=1 obj=0 op='DELETE LIENHOLDER (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)'
STAT #3 id=2 cnt=0 pid=1 pos=1 obj=0 op='PX COORDINATOR (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)'
STAT #3 id=3 cnt=0 pid=2 pos=1 obj=0 op='PX SEND QC (RANDOM) :TQ10002 (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=95123 size=6011574 card=117874)'
STAT #3 id=4 cnt=0 pid=3 pos=1 obj=0 op='HASH JOIN RIGHT SEMI (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=95123 size=6011574 card=117874)'
STAT #3 id=5 cnt=0 pid=4 pos=1 obj=0 op='PX RECEIVE (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=88665 size=1472328 card=113256)'
STAT #3 id=6 cnt=0 pid=5 pos=1 obj=0 op='PX SEND BROADCAST :TQ10001 (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=88665 size=1472328 card=113256)'
STAT #3 id=7 cnt=0 pid=6 pos=1 obj=0 op='VIEW VW_NSO_1 (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=88665 size=1472328 card=113256)'
STAT #3 id=8 cnt=0 pid=7 pos=1 obj=0 op='HASH JOIN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=88665 size=1925352 card=113256)'
STAT #3 id=9 cnt=0 pid=8 pos=1 obj=0 op='BUFFER SORT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)'
STAT #3 id=10 cnt=0 pid=9 pos=1 obj=0 op='PX RECEIVE (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=27 size=314700 card=62940)'
STAT #3 id=11 cnt=0 pid=10 pos=1 obj=0 op='PX SEND BROADCAST :TQ10000 (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=27 size=314700 card=62940)'
STAT #3 id=12 cnt=0 pid=11 pos=1 obj=55756 op='TABLE ACCESS FULL DEL_POL (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=27 size=314700 card=62940)'
STAT #3 id=13 cnt=0 pid=8 pos=2 obj=0 op='PX BLOCK ITERATOR (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=88594 size=160428864 card=13369072)'
STAT #3 id=14 cnt=0 pid=13 pos=1 obj=70801 op='TABLE ACCESS FULL POLICY12SEGMENT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=88594 size=160428864 card=13369072)'
STAT #3 id=15 cnt=0 pid=4 pos=2 obj=0 op='PX BLOCK ITERATOR (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=6434 size=265286208 card=6981216)'
STAT #3 id=16 cnt=0 pid=15 pos=1 obj=70798 op='TABLE ACCESS FULL LIENHOLDER (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=6434 size=265286208 card=6981216)'
CLOSE #3:c=0,e=0,dep=1,type=0,tim=2806650618906
EXEC #2:c=30000,e=142914,p=0,cr=209,cu=3,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=0,tim=2806650618906
ERROR #2:err=12801 tim=2806650618906
=====================The Table LIENHOLDER is not set for parallelism and is not amount 7 of those tables. But even when we enabled parallelism with degree of 2 on LIENHOLDER, it is still thowing out this error message.
I have granted DBA role to POL_ODS who owns this procedure POL_ODS.DELETE_LATEST_POLICY_1.
Waiting for your inputs and hope to hear from the Oracle & Informatica experts soon.
Thanks!

Thanks for your reply Karluk & hoek.
Just to let you know, we are encountering this problem when I enable parallelism on the 7 tables.
TABLE_NAME                     DEGREE
POLICY30SEGMENT                         2
POLICY03SEGMENT                         2
POLICY                                  2
POLICY12SEGMENT                         2
POLICY35SEGMENT                         2
POLICY45SEGMENT                         2
VEHICLECOVERAGE                         2Proc DELETE_LATEST_POLICY_1 is owned by POL_ODS and this job is run by POL_ODS itself. This PROC does delete. Yes, LEINHOLDER is owned by POL_ODS only so there is no need to grant DELETE on this table to it's own schema.
As stated in my the trace file, the DELETE statement that it was running was -
DELETE FROM LIENHOLDER WHERE LIEN_POLICY_12_SEGMENT_ID IN (SELECT POL_SEG_12_ID FROM POLICY12SEGMENT WHERE POLICY_ID IN (SELECT POLICY_ID FROM DEL_POL))In this POLICY12SEGMENT is enabled for parallelism but not LIENHOLDER or DEL_POL.
If I don't have parallelism on these 7 tables then the PROC runs fine and it does the delete as expected.
Hope I am clear this time.
Thanks for your time Guys!
Edited by: user608897 on May 10, 2011 6:32 PM

ORA-12801: error signalled in parallel query sever P0007 ORA-00600:internal

Clould someone please help me and interpret the meaning of the following error
"ora-12801:error signaled query server P005-00600: internal error code, arguments:[kxspoc:EXL1]"
This error occur at post-change trigger of one of the fields in my form9i application.
The code below is a program unit within the form that it is called at the post-change trigger of "loan_application_no" field that raise the error
PROCEDURE DRV_LOAN_APPL_DET(
P_LOAN_APPLICATION_NO IN NUMBER /* Item value */
,P_LOAN_CODE IN VARCHAR2 /* Item value */
,P_EMP_NO IN VARCHAR2 /* Item value */
,P_FIELD_LEVEL IN BOOLEAN ) IS /* Is the trigger item level */
BEGIN
DECLARE
CURSOR C IS
SELECT LM.LOAN_CODE DSP_LOAN_CODE
,LM.LOAN_CODE DSP_LOAN_CODE
,LC5.DESCRIPTION DSP_DESCRIPTION
,LM.PRINCIPAL_AMOUNT DSP_PRINCIPAL_AMOUNT
,LM.TOTAL_PRINCIPAL_PAID DSP_TOTAL_PRINCIPAL_PAID
FROM LOAN_MASTER LM
,LOAN_CODES LC5
WHERE P_emp_no=emp_no
and P_loan_application_no = loan_application_no
AND LC5.LOAN_CODE = LM.LOAN_CODE;
BEGIN
OPEN C;
FETCH C
INTO
:one.loan_code
,:one.DSP_LOAN_CODE
,:one.dsp_DESCRIPTION
,:one.dsp_PRINCIPAL_AMOUNT
,:one.dsp_TOTAL_PRINCIPAL_PAID ;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
CGTE$OTHER_EXCEPTIONS;
END;
END;
please help, thanks
Joy

You want to close cursor C ...
... or just use a select .... into .... it's much easier (and executes quicker).

My lovely complicated SQL crashes with ORA-00600: internal[qerpfAllocateX2]

ORACLE 9201
Hi all
I wrote a nice query to look for combinations of transactions using a "connect by prior" to arrange a half-cartesian join, then look for all connected paths that were a certain depth and whose nodes added up to a certain value. It works great and has tested out fine in the debug runs I've given it, but it is falling over in live with the following weird error:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [qerpfAllocateX2], [4038], [4028], [], [], [], [], []
I was originally getting this and I solved it during debug, using a WITH statement rather than twice doing a nested select on my source table.. I double checked and I'm using the WITH verison (in PL/SQL)
What I dont get, is I can run it straight from e.g. Visual Studio just fine, but when my PL/SQL code calls into the function, it all falls apart with this error. Is there anything I can do to help investigate the cause or to fix?
The original thread, where you guys helped me write the SQL, is: Re: A little help writing an SQL please? May need some advanced functionality..
Regards
cj
Edited by: charred on Sep 15, 2008 8:05 AM

If you are running on 9i this could be as a result of a known database bug.
"A query may fail with ORA-600[qerpfAllocateX2] when the prefetch size exceeds the sort buffersize."
Bug: 2277191
Fixed in 10g or > v9202
With most ORA-600 errors, the only solution available is to contact Oracle Support or try and re-write the query to use different access methods (plans).
Christopher Soza
Oracle BI DBA
Orix Consultancy Services Ltd
http://sozaman.blogspot.com

Help - SQL with err ORA-12801 or rewrite SQL recommendation

When trying delete statement below am getting the error , can you please recommend alternate ways of do this DML .. am sure change in memory allocation is not required just the way current DML is constructed is not correct\ inefficient , am getting the same error even when the trying to select for same DML conditions below and it works fine in tables with less data.
DELETE
FROM temp_test t1
WHERE t1.reltid = 240
AND EXISTS
(SELECT x.combid
,x.csbid
FROM temp_both x
WHERE x.combid = t1.combid
AND x.csbid = t1.csbid
GROUP BY x.combid
,x.csbid
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
AND EXISTS
(SELECT a.reltid, a.end_dt,b.reltid,b.end_dt
from (SELECT combid,csbid,end_dt,reltid
from temp_both where reltid = 239) a
(SELECT combid,csbid,end_dt,reltid
from temp_both where reltid = 240) b
where a.end_dt >= b.end_dt
and a.csbid = b.csbid
and b.combid = t1.combid
and a.csbid = t1.csbid
and a.combid = t1.combid);
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P034
ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate
Can some explain the flow the above SQL is processing, recomened alternate ways of writing the same.

Ask your DBA to look into this matter. It looks like the database server facing a resource crunch.
If you are running a dedicated server mode, you might need to switch over to shared server mode. Again, the DBA has to look into this.

Ora_m000 consuming 100% cpu with ORA-00600 [kcbz_check_objd_typ_3], [0]

Hello,
I have been trying to troubleshoot high cpu usage in our Ebiz R12 environment where cpu is running 100% by ora_m000 process and I see ORA-00600 in alert log.
I have tried work around from metalink note 466049.1 and even applied fixed for patch 4430244, 5752105 but it hasn't fixed the issue.
Before going through opening a ticket with support, I thought try my luck here. I'd really appreciate any suggestions to fix this problem.
content of trace file.
*** KEWROCISTMTEXEC - encountered error: (ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kcbz_check_objd_typ_3], [0], [0], [1], [], [], [], [])
*** SQLSTR: total-len=176, dump-len=176,
STR={insert into wrh$_sysstat (snap_id, dbid, instance_number, stat_id, value) select :snap_id, :dbid, :instance_number, stat_id, value from v$sysstat order by stat_id}
*** KEWRAFM1: Error=13509 encountered by kewrfteh

What's your database version in four decimal places?
ORA-600 is Oracle internal error you need to work with Oracle support to fix the problem.
Also use "Troubleshoot an ORA-600 or ORA-7445 Error Using the Error Lookup Tool"
The lookup tool will show you the known bug related to the error message.

ORA-12801 error signalled in parallel query with ORA-00018 max # session

Hello,
I've just run dbca to create a new database. On completion I received the following:
ORA-12801 error was signalled in parallel query server
ORA-00018 maximum number of sessions exceeded
ORA-06512 at sys_utl_recomp line 760
ORA-06512 as sys_utl_recomp line 773
ORA-06512 as sys_utl_recomp line 1
The processes are set at 100, sessions is set at 115?
Can you tell how to address this error and resolve the problem? I'm thinking that I should rerun sys_utl_recomp

Hi,
You didn't mention oracle version as well OS.
might be you hit a bug.
check the below link for reference
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=130:14:8051847734518941130::::p14_database_id,p14_docid,p14_show_header,p14_show_help,p14_black_frame,p14_font:NOT,21564.1,1,1,1,helvetica
Regards,
Taj

Ora-12801 with ora - 00600 urgent

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for