Ora-14036 error partition bound too large for column

Hi All,
I have a partitioned table on balance_period .. format YYYYMM .
I am trying to split the PMAX partition but get the errors :-
> ALTER TABLE ACT_MD_FOREIGNEXCHANGE SPLIT PARTITION ACT_MD_FOREIGNEX_PMAX AT (TO_DATE ('20081201', 'YYYYMMDD))
2 INTO (PARTITION ACT_MD_FOREIGNEX_200812, PARTITION ACT_MD_FOREIGNEX_PMAX);
ALTER TABLE ACT_MD_FOREIGNEXCHANGE SPLIT PARTITION ACT_MD_FOREIGNEX_PMAX AT (TO_DATE ('20081201', 'YYYYMMDD))
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01756: quoted string not properly terminated
> ALTER TABLE ACT_MD_FOREIGNEXCHANGE SPLIT PARTITION ACT_MD_FOREIGNEX_PMAX AT (TO_DATE ('20081201', 'YYYYMMDD'))
2 INTO (PARTITION ACT_MD_FOREIGNEX_200812, PARTITION ACT_MD_FOREIGNEX_PMAX);
ALTER TABLE ACT_MD_FOREIGNEXCHANGE SPLIT PARTITION ACT_MD_FOREIGNEX_PMAX AT (TO_DATE ('20081201', 'YYYYMMDD'))
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14036: partition bound value too large for column
What is the correct format for the AT part of the statement please ?

I believe that the partition definitions for the other partitions are not the same as the value you gave in your split statement. Check the definitions for the existing partitions.
14036, 00000, "partition bound value too large for column"
// *Cause: Length of partition bound value is longer than that of the
// corresponding partitioning column.
// *Action: Ensure that lengths of high bound values do not exceed those of
// corresponding partitioning columnsJohn

Similar Messages

Inserted value too large for column Error

I have this table:
CREATE TABLE SMt_Session
     SessionID int NOT NULL ,
     SessionUID char (36) NOT NULL ,
     UserID int NOT NULL ,
     IPAddress varchar2 (15) NOT NULL ,
     Created timestamp NOT NULL ,
     Accessed timestamp NOT NULL ,
     SessionInfo nclob NULL
and this insert from a sp (sp name is SMsp_SessionCreate):
     Now := (SYSDATE);
     SessionUID := SYS_GUID();
     /*create the session in the session table*/
     INSERT INTO SMt_Session
               ( SessionUID ,
               UserID ,
               IPAddress ,
               Created ,
               Accessed )
     VALUES           ( SMsp_SessionCreate.SessionUID ,
               SMsp_SessionCreate.UserID ,
               SMsp_SessionCreate.IPAddress ,
               SMsp_SessionCreate.Now ,
               SMsp_SessionCreate.Now );
It looks like the param SessionUID is the one with trouble, but the length of sys_guid() is 32, and my column has 36.
IPAddress is passed to the sp with value '192.168.11.11', so it should fit.
UserID is 1.
I am confused, what is the column with problem ?

CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE SMsp_SessionCreate
     PartitionID IN      INT ,
     UserID IN      INT ,
     IPAddress IN      VARCHAR2 ,
     SessionID IN OUT      INT,
     SessionUID IN OUT      CHAR,
     UserName IN OUT      VARCHAR2,
     UserFirst IN OUT      VARCHAR2,
     UserLast IN OUT      VARCHAR2,
     SupplierID IN OUT      INT,
     PartitionName IN OUT      VARCHAR2,
     Expiration IN      INT ,
     RCT1 OUT      GLOBALPKG.RCT1
AS
     Now DATE;
     SCOPE_IDENTITY_VARIABLE INT;
BEGIN
     Now := SYSDATE;
     -- the new Session UID
     SessionUID := SYS_GUID();
     /*Cleanup any old sessions for this user*/
     INSERT INTO SMt_Session_History
               ( UserID ,
               IPAddress ,
               Created ,
               LastAccessed ,
               LoggedOut )
     SELECT
               UserID,
               IPAddress,
               Created,
               Accessed,
               TO_DATE(Accessed + (1/24/60 * SMsp_SessionCreate.Expiration))
     FROM SMt_Session
     WHERE     UserID = SMsp_SessionCreate.UserID;
     --delete old
     DELETE FROM SMt_Session
     WHERE UserID = SMsp_SessionCreate.UserID;
     /*create the session in the session table*/
     INSERT INTO SMt_Session
               ( SessionUID ,
               UserID ,
               IPAddress ,
               Created ,
               Accessed )
     VALUES           ( SMsp_SessionCreate.SessionUID ,
               SMsp_SessionCreate.UserID ,
               SMsp_SessionCreate.IPAddress ,
               SMsp_SessionCreate.Now ,
               SMsp_SessionCreate.Now );
     SELECT SMt_Session_SessionID_SEQ.CURRVAL INTO SMsp_SessionCreate.SessionID FROM dual;
     --SELECT SMt_Session_SessionID_SEQ.CURRVAL INTO SCOPE_IDENTITY_VARIABLE FROM DUAL;
     --get VALUES to return
     SELECT u.AccountName INTO SMsp_SessionCreate.UserName FROM SMt_Users u WHERE u.UserID = SMsp_SessionCreate.UserID;
     SELECT u.SupplierID INTO SMsp_SessionCreate.SupplierID FROM SMt_Users u WHERE u.UserID = SMsp_SessionCreate.UserID;
     SELECT u.FirstName INTO SMsp_SessionCreate.UserFirst FROM SMt_Users u WHERE u.UserID = SMsp_SessionCreate.UserID;
     SELECT u.LastName INTO SMsp_SessionCreate.UserLast FROM SMt_Users u WHERE u.UserID = SMsp_SessionCreate.UserID;
     BEGIN
          FOR REC IN ( SELECT
               u.AccountName,
               u.SupplierID,
               u.FirstName,
               u.LastName FROM SMt_Users u
     WHERE     UserID = SMsp_SessionCreate.UserID
          LOOP
               SMsp_SessionCreate.UserName := REC.AccountName;
               SMsp_SessionCreate.SupplierID := REC.SupplierID;
               SMsp_SessionCreate.UserFirst := REC.FirstName;
               SMsp_SessionCreate.UserLast := REC.LastName;
          END LOOP;
     END;
     BEGIN
          FOR REC IN ( SELECT PartitionName FROM SMt_Partitions
     WHERE     PartitionID = SMsp_SessionCreate.PartitionID
          LOOP
               SMsp_SessionCreate.PartitionName := REC.PartitionName;
          END LOOP;
     END;
     /*retrieve all user roles*/
     OPEN RCT1 FOR
     SELECT RoleID     FROM SMt_UserRoles
     WHERE     UserID = SMsp_SessionCreate.UserID;
END;
this is the exact code of the sp. The table definition is this:
CREATE TABLE SMt_Session
SessionID int NOT NULL ,
SessionUID char (36) NOT NULL ,
UserID int NOT NULL ,
IPAddress varchar2 (15) NOT NULL ,
Created timestamp NOT NULL ,
Accessed timestamp NOT NULL ,
SessionInfo nclob NULL
The sp gets executed with this params:
PARTITIONID := -2;
USERID := 1;
IPADDRESS := '192.168.11.11';
SESSIONID := -1;
SESSIONUID := NULL;
USERNAME := '';
USERFIRST := '';
USERLAST := '';
SUPPLIERID := -1;
PARTITIONNAME := '';
EXPIRATION := 300;
if I ran the code inside the procedure in sql+ (not the procedure), it works. when i call the sp i get the error
inserted value too large for column
at line 48

SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column

Hi,
I'm trying to understand the above error. It occurs when we are migrating data from one oracle database to another:
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column "USER_XYZ"."TAB_XYZ"."COL_XYZ" (actual: 10, maximum: 8)
12899. 00000 - "value too large for column %s (actual: %s, maximum: %s)"
*Cause:    An attempt was made to insert or update a column with a value
which is too wide for the width of the destination column.
The name of the column is given, along with the actual width
of the value, and the maximum allowed width of the column.
Note that widths are reported in characters if character length
semantics are in effect for the column, otherwise widths are
reported in bytes.
*Action:   Examine the SQL statement for correctness. Check source
and destination column data types.
Either make the destination column wider, or use a subset
of the source column (i.e. use substring).
The source database runs - Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
The target database runs - Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
The source and target table are identical and the column definitions are exactly the same. The column we get the error on is of CHAR(8). To migrate the data we use either a dblink or oracle datapump, both result in the same error. The data in the column is a fixed length string of 8 characters.
To resolve the error the column "COL_XYZ" gets widened by:
alter table TAB_XYZ modify (COL_XYZ varchar2(10));
-alter table TAB_XYZ succeeded.
We now move the data from the source into the target table without problem and then run:
select max(length(COL_XYZ)) from TAB_XYZ;
-8
So the maximal string length for this column is 8 characters. To reduce the column width back to its original 8, we then run:
alter table TAB_XYZ modify (COL_XYZ varchar2(8));
-Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-01441: cannot decrease column length because some value is too big
01441. 00000 - "cannot decrease column length because some value is too big"
*Cause:
*Action:
So we leave the column width at 10, but the curious thing is - once we have the data in the target table, we can then truncate the same table at source (ie. get rid of all the data) and move the data back in the original table (with COL_XYZ set at CHAR(8)) - without any issue.
My guess the error has something to do with the storage on the target database, but I would like to understand why. If anybody has an idea or suggestion what to look for - much appreciated.
Cheers.

843217 wrote:
Note that widths are reported in characters if character length
semantics are in effect for the column, otherwise widths are
reported in bytes.You are looking at character lengths vs byte lengths.
The data in the column is a fixed length string of 8 characters.
select max(length(COL_XYZ)) from TAB_XYZ;
-8
So the maximal string length for this column is 8 characters. To reduce the column width back to its original 8, we then run:
alter table TAB_XYZ modify (COL_XYZ varchar2(8));varchar2(8 byte) or varchar2(8 char)?
Use SQL Reference for datatype specification, length function, etc.
For more info, reference {forum:id=50} forum on the topic. And of course, the Globalization support guide.

I am getting error "ORA-12899: value too large for column".

I am getting error "ORA-12899: value too large for column" after upgrading to 10.2.0.4.0
Field is updating only through trigger with hard coded value.
This happens randomly not everytime.
select * from v$version
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE     10.2.0.4.0     Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Table Structure
desc customer
Name Null? Type
CTRY_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(3 Byte)
CO_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(3 Byte)
CUST_NBR NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
CUST_NAME CHAR(40 Byte)
RECORD_STATUS CHAR(1 Byte)
Trigger on the table
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER CUST_INSUPD
BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE
ON CUSTOMER FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
IF INSERTING THEN
:NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'I';
ELSIF UPDATING THEN
:NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'U';
END IF;
END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01001: invalid cursor
ORA-06512: at "UPDATE_CUSTOMER", line 1320
ORA-12899: value too large for column "CUSTOMER"."RECORD_STATUS" (actual: 3,
maximum: 1)
ORA-06512: at line 1
Edited by: user4211491 on Nov 25, 2009 9:30 PM
Edited by: user4211491 on Nov 25, 2009 9:32 PM

SQL> create table customer(
2 CTRY_CODE CHAR(3 Byte) not null,
3 CO_CODE CHAR(3 Byte) not null,
4 CUST_NBR NUMBER(10) not null,
5 CUST_NAME CHAR(40 Byte) ,
6 RECORD_STATUS CHAR(1 Byte)
7 );
Table created.
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER CUST_INSUPD
2 BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE
3 ON CUSTOMER FOR EACH ROW
4 BEGIN
5 IF INSERTING THEN
6 :NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'I';
7 ELSIF UPDATING THEN
8 :NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'U';
9 END IF;
10 END;
11 /
Trigger created.
SQL> insert into customer(CTRY_CODE,CO_CODE,CUST_NBR,CUST_NAME,RECORD_STATUS)
2                values('12','13','1','Mahesh Kaila','UPD');
              values('12','13','1','Mahesh Kaila','UPD')
ERROR at line 2:
ORA-12899: value too large for column "HPVPPM"."CUSTOMER"."RECORD_STATUS"
(actual: 3, maximum: 1)
SQL> insert into customer(CTRY_CODE,CO_CODE,CUST_NBR,CUST_NAME)
2                values('12','13','1','Mahesh Kaila');
1 row created.
SQL> set linesize 200
SQL> select * from customer;
CTR CO_   CUST_NBR CUST_NAME                                R
12 13           1 Mahesh Kaila                             I
SQL> update customer set cust_name='tst';
1 row updated.
SQL> select * from customer;
CTR CO_   CUST_NBR CUST_NAME                                R
12 13           1 tst                                      Urecheck your code once again..somewhere you are using record_status column for insertion or updation.
Ravi Kumar

Replicat error: ORA-12899: value too large for column ...

Hi,
In our system Source and Target are on the same physical server and in the same Oracle instance. Just different schemes.
Tables on the target were created as 'create table ... as select * from ... source_table', so they have a similar structure. Table names are also similar.
I started replicat, it worked fine for several hours, but when I inserted Chinese symbols into the source table I got an error:
WARNING OGG-00869 Oracle GoldenGate Delivery for Oracle, OGGEX1.prm: OCI Error ORA-12899: value too large for column "MY_TARGET_SCHEMA"."TABLE1"."*FIRSTNAME*" (actual: 93, maximum: 40) (status = 12899), SQL <INSERT INTO "MY_TARGET_SCHEMA"."TABLE1" ("USERID","USERNAME","FIRSTNAME","LASTNAME",....>.
FIRSTNAME is Varchar2(40 char) field.
I suppose the problem probably is our database is running with NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS='CHAR'
I've double checked tables structure on the target - it's identical with the source.
I also tried to manually insert this record into the target table using 'insert into ... select * from ... ' statement - it works. The problem seems to be in the replicat.
How to fix this error?
Thanks in advance!
Oracle GoldenGate version: 11.1.1.1
Oracle Database version: 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
NLS_LANG: AMERICAN_AMERICA.AL32UTF8
NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS='CHAR'
Edited by: DeniK on Jun 20, 2012 11:49 PM
Edited by: DeniK on Jun 23, 2012 12:05 PM
Edited by: DeniK on Jun 25, 2012 1:55 PM

I've created the definition files and compared them. They are absolutely identical, apart from source and target schema names:
Source definition file:
Definition for table MY_SOURCE_SCHEMA.TABLE1
Record length: 1632
Syskey: 0
Columns: 30
USERID 134 11 0 0 0 1 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
USERNAME 64 80 12 0 0 1 0 80 80 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
FIRSTNAME 64 160 98 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LASTNAME 64 160 264 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
PASSWORD 64 160 430 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
TITLE 64 160 596 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Target definition file:
Definition for table MY_TAEGET_SCHEMA.TABLE1
Record length: 1632
Syskey: 0
Columns: 30
USERID 134 11 0 0 0 1 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
USERNAME 64 80 12 0 0 1 0 80 80 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
FIRSTNAME 64 160 98 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LASTNAME 64 160 264 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
PASSWORD 64 160 430 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
TITLE 64 160 596 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Edited by: DeniK on Jun 25, 2012 1:56 PM
Edited by: DeniK on Jun 25, 2012 1:57 PM

EXEC SQL Error: ORA-01401: Inserted value too large for column

Getting this SQL Error: ORA-01401: Inserted value too large for column..on an EXEC SQL Insert statement when writing to an
external Oracle DB from SAP.
On further analysis..it appears that this happens to the fields..when the string length matches the field length.
Example: Plant field is defined as char(4) on the SAP side and it is a Varchar2(4) on the Oracle side.
When a value like '1015' is passed thru a variable in the insert statement then this ORA-01401 error pops up.
No error:
   - if the value '1015' is passed directly in the insert statement to the external table (or)
   - when a value with 3 chars or less(like the first three chars..101) is passed thru a variable defined as 'Plant(4) type c'.
   - when using EXEC sql within SAP
   - when reading from the external db table
This was working ok until the Oracle Patch P9147110 was installed recently.
Any suggestions !

Hello Dvas,
what's the characterset of your external database?
What's the column definition in your external database (byte or character based)?
If you use a characeterset like UTF8 it is possible, that one character needs more than one byte and then you will run into such kind of issues if the definition is too small.
Regards
Stefan

Snapshot refresh error: ora-01401 inserted value too large for column

I have an error ora-01401 "Inserted value too large for column" when I try to do a refresh on a group at the materialized view site.
My model is 1 master replicating to a readonly materialized view site. I have 2 refresh groups for separate sets of tables. 1 refresh group work fine...the other I got the above error.
I have doubled the rbs and system tablespace without any help thinking that I must be running out of default rollback segment space.
Anyone has this before?

The error is related to a field, not to any tablespace. This normaly happens to me when I change the lenght or resolution of a field in the base tables. The structure changes don't "flow" to the materialized view! I must "regenerate" them. Normally droping and creating it again to make them receive the new lenght of that field.
Sometimes, when the field changed is not part of any primary key I have changes directly the field in the materialized view as if it was a normal table.
Hope this helps
Luis

Getting error ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column

Hello ,
I have Configured the scenario IDOC to JDBC .In the SXMB_MONI am getting the succes message .But in the Adapter Monitor am getting the error message as
ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column and the entries also not inserted in to the table.I hope this is because of the date format only.In Oracle table date field has defined in the format of '01-JAN-2005'.I am also passing the date field in the same format only for INVOICE_DATE and INVOICE_DUE_DATE.Please see the target structure .
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns:INVOICE_INFO_MT xmlns:ns="http://sap.com/xi/InvoiceIDoc_Test">
- <Statement>
- <INVOICE_INFO action="INSERT">
- <access>
<INVOICE_ID>0090000303</INVOICE_ID>
<INVOICE_DATE>01-Dec-2005</INVOICE_DATE>
<INVOICE_DUE_DATE>01-Jan-2005</INVOICE_DUE_DATE>
<ORDER_ID>0000000000011852</ORDER_ID>
<ORDER_LINE_NUM>000010</ORDER_LINE_NUM>
<INVOICE_TYPE>LR</INVOICE_TYPE>
<INVOICE_ORGINAL_AMT>10000</INVOICE_ORGINAL_AMT>
<INVOICE_OUTSTANDING_AMT>1000</INVOICE_OUTSTANDING_AMT>
<INTERNAL_USE_FLG>X</INTERNAL_USE_FLG>
<BILLTO>0004000012</BILLTO>
<SHIPTO>40000006</SHIPTO>
<STATUS_ID>O</STATUS_ID>
</access>
</INVOICE_INFO>
</Statement>
</ns:INVOICE_INFO_MT>
Please let me know what are all the possible solution to fix the error and to insert the entries in the table.
Thanks in Advance!

Hi muthu,
// inserted value too large for column
When your oracle insertion throws this error, it implies that some value that you are trying to insert into the table is larger than the allocated size.
Just check the format of your table and the respective size of each field on your oracle cleint by using the command,
DESCRIBE <tablename> .
and then verify it with the input. I dont think the problem is with the DATE format because if it is not a valid date format, you would have got on error like
String Literal does not match type
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Bhavesh

Adding virtual column: ORA-12899: value too large for column

I'm using Oracle 11g, Win7 OS, SQL Developer
I'm trying to add virtual column to my test table, but getting ORA-12899: value too large for column error. Below are the details.
Can someone help me in this?
CREATE TABLE test_reg_exp
(col1 VARCHAR2(100));
INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('ABCD_EFGH');
INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('ABCDE_ABC');
INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('WXYZ_ABCD');
INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('ABCDE_PQRS');
INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('ABCD_WXYZ');
ALTER TABLE test_reg_exp
ADD (col2 VARCHAR2(100) GENERATED ALWAYS AS (REGEXP_REPLACE (col1, '^ABCD[A-Z]*_')));
SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column "COL2" (actual: 100, maximum: 400)
12899. 00000 - "value too large for column %s (actual: %s, maximum: %s)"
*Cause:    An attempt was made to insert or update a column with a value
           which is too wide for the width of the destination column.
           The name of the column is given, along with the actual width
           of the value, and the maximum allowed width of the column.
           Note that widths are reported in characters if character length
           semantics are in effect for the column, otherwise widths are
           reported in bytes.
*Action:   Examine the SQL statement for correctness. Check source
           and destination column data types.
           Either make the destination column wider, or use a subset
           of the source column (i.e. use substring).When I try to select, I'm getting correct results:
SELECT col1, (REGEXP_REPLACE (col1, '^ABCD[A-Z]*_'))
FROM test_reg_exp;Thanks.

Yes RP, it working if you give col2 size >=400.
@Northwest - Could you please test the same w/o having a regex clause in col2?
I doubt on the usage of a REGEX in this dynamic col case.
Refer this (might help) -- http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/11g/virtual-columns-11gr1.php
Below snippet from above link.... see if this helps...
>
Notes and restrictions on virtual columns include:
Indexes defined against virtual columns are equivalent to function-based indexes.
Virtual columns can be referenced in the WHERE clause of updates and deletes, but they cannot be manipulated by DML.
Tables containing virtual columns can still be eligible for result caching.
Functions in expressions must be deterministic at the time of table creation, but can subsequently be recompiled and made non-deterministic without invalidating the virtual column. In such cases the following steps must be taken after the function is recompiled:
Constraint on the virtual column must be disabled and re-enabled.
Indexes on the virtual column must be rebuilt.
Materialized views that access the virtual column must be fully refreshed.
The result cache must be flushed if cached queries have accessed the virtual column.
Table statistics must be regathered.
Virtual columns are not supported for index-organized, external, object, cluster, or temporary tables.
The expression used in the virtual column definition has the following restrictions:
It cannot refer to another virtual column by name.
It can only refer to columns defined in the same table.
If it refers to a deterministic user-defined function, it cannot be used as a partitioning key column.
The output of the expression must be a scalar value. It cannot return an Oracle supplied datatype, a user-defined type, or LOB or LONG RAW.
>
Edited by: ranit B on Oct 16, 2012 11:48 PM
Edited by: ranit B on Oct 16, 2012 11:54 PM

Imp/exp ORA-12899: value too large for column

imp/exp ORA-12899: value too large for column
source :
os: linux as 4 update4
.bash_profile NLS_LANG=AMERICAN_AMERICA.US7ASCII
for run exp bill/admin001 file=bill0518.dmp bill rows=y
oracle: 10.2.1
NLS_LANGUAGE AMERICAN
NLS_TERRITORY AMERICA
NLS_CHARACTERSET US7ASCII
target :
os: linux as 4 update4
.bash_profile NLS_LANG=AMERICAN_AMERICA.AL32UTF8
for run
imp bill/admin001 file=bill0518.dmp
oracle: 10.2.1
NLS_LANGUAGE AMERICAN
NLS_TERRITORY AMERICA
NLS_CHARACTERSET AL32UTF8
imp log
Import: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed May 16 14:57:59 2007
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Produc tion
With the Partitioning, Real Application Clusters, OLAP and Data Mining options
Export file created by EXPORT:V10.02.01 via conventional path
import done in US7ASCII character set and AL16UTF16 NCHAR character set
import server uses AL32UTF8 character set (possible charset conversion)
export client uses AL32UTF8 character set (possible charset conversion)
. importing BILL's objects into BILL
. . importing table "MY_SESSION" 44 rows imported
. . importing table "T1"
IMP-00019: row rejected due to ORACLE error 12899
IMP-00003: ORACLE error 12899 encountered
ORA-12899: value too large for column "BILL"."T1"."NAME" (actual: 62, maximum: 5 0)
Column 1 1
Column 2 ÖÐ¹úÈË. 0 rows impo rted
Import terminated successfully with warnings.

Yes it's probably due to different char sets
A way around it it to change the DB setup on the new database to use CHAR as default for varchar2 rows, and then use datapump to do your import/export, because datapump uses the default varchar2 type when creating tables that includes varchar2 (which is normally byte). Exp/imp uses the varchar2 type that is in the original database
Best regards
/Klaus

Fdpstp failed due to ora-12899 value too large for column

Hi All,
User facing this problem while running the concurrent program.
the program is complted but with rhis error.
fdpstp failed due to ora-12899 value too large for column
Can any one tell me the excat solution for this?
RDBMS : 10.2.0.3.0
Oracle Applications : 11.5.10.2

User facing this problem while running the concurrent program.
the program is complted but with rhis error.Is this a seeded or custom concurrent program?
fdpstp failed due to ora-12899 value too large for column
Can any one tell me the excat solution for this?Was this working before? If yes, any changes been done recently?
Can other users run the same concurrent program with no issues?
Please post the contents of the concurrent request log file here.
Please ask your developer to open the file using Reports Builder and compile the report and run it (if possible) with the same parameters.
OERR: ORA-12899 value too large for column %s (actual: %s, maximum: %s) [ID 287754.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Install fails due to ORA-12899: value too large for column

Hi,
Our WCS 11g installation on Tomcat 7 fails giving a "ORA-12899: value too large for column".
As per the solution ticket https://support.oracle.com/epmos/faces/DocumentDisplay?id=1539055.1 we have to set "-Dfile.encoding=UTF-8" in tomcat.
We have done this beforehand by setting the variable in catalina.bat in tomcat 7 bin as shown below
But still we get the same error while installation.
If anybody has faced this , let us know how you resolved it

We were unable to install WCS on Tomcat 7 but on Tomcat 6 by specifying "-Dfile.encoding=UTF-8" in java options using "Tomcat Configure" it was succesful.
An alternative we found was to increase the value of the column itself.
Using command
ALTER TABLE csuser.systemlocalestring
MODIFY value varchar2 (4000)

Error on reverse on XML: value too large for column

Hi All,
I am trying to reverse engineer while creating the data model on XML technology.
My JDBC URL on data server reads this:
jdbc:snps:xml?d=../demo/abc/CustomerPartyEBO.xsd&s=MYEBO
I get an error while doing the reverse.
java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column "PINW"."SNP_REV_KEY_COL"."KEY_NAME" (actual: 102, maximum: 100)
After doing some check through selective reverse, found that this is happening only for few tables, whose names are quite longer.
Tried setting the "maximum column name length" and "maximum table name length" to 120 and even higher values on XML technology from Topology Manager. No luck there.
Thanks in advance for any help here.

That is not the place to change.
The error states that the SNP_REV_KEY_COL.KEY_NAME in the Work Repository schema PINW has maximum length defined to be 100.
I donot know if Oracle will support this change but you will have to make a change to the Work Repository table SNP_REV_KEY_COL and change the column lengths as a workaround.

Data Profiling - Value too large for column error

I am running a data profile which completes with errors. The error being reported is an ORA 12899 Value too large for column actual (41 maximum 40).
I have checked the actual data in the table and the maximum is only 40 characters.
Any ideas on how to solve this. Even though it completes no actual profile is done on the data due to the error.
OWB version 11.2.0.1
Log file below.
Job     Rows Selected     Rows Inserted     Rows Updated     Rows Deleted     Errors     Warnings     Start Time     Elapsed Time
Profile_1306385940099                                   2011-05-26 14:59:00.0     106
Data profiling operations complete.
Redundant column analysis for objects complete in 0 s.
Redundant column analysis for objects.
Referential analysis for objects complete in 0.405 s.
Referential analysis for objects.
Referential analysis initialization complete in 8.128 s.
Referential analysis initialization.
Data rule analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0 s.
Data rule analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0 s.
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.858 s.
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.202 s.
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 9.236 s.
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0 s.
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.842 s.
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.187 s.
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 9.501 s.
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0 s.
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.717 s.
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.156 s.
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 9.906 s.
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0 s.
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.827 s.
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.187 s.
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 9.172 s.
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0 s.
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.889 s.
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.202 s.
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 9.313 s.
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME complete in 9.267 s.
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME complete in 10.187 s.
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME complete in 8.019 s.
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME complete in 5.507 s.
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME complete in 10.857 s.
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME
Parameters
O82647310CF4D425C8AED9AAE_MAP_ProfileLoader                              1     2011-05-26 14:59:00.0     11
ORA-12899: value too large for column "SCHEMA"."O90239B0C1105447EB6495C903678"."ITEM_NAME_1" (actual: 41, maximum: 40)
Parameters
O68A16A57F2054A13B8761BDC_MAP_ProfileLoader                              1     2011-05-26 14:59:11.0     5
ORA-12899: value too large for column "SCHEMA"."O0D9332A164E649F3B4D05D045521"."ITEM_NAME_1" (actual: 41, maximum: 40)
Parameters
O78AD6B482FC44D8BB7AF8357_MAP_ProfileLoader                              1     2011-05-26 14:59:16.0     9
ORA-12899: value too large for column "SCHEMA"."OBF77A8BA8E6847B8AAE4522F98D6"."ITEM_NAME_2" (actual: 41, maximum: 40)
Parameters
OA79DF482D74847CF8EA05807_MAP_ProfileLoader                              1     2011-05-26 14:59:25.0     10
ORA-12899: value too large for column "SCHEMA"."OB0052CBCA5784DAD935F9FCF2E28"."ITEM_NAME_1" (actual: 41, maximum: 40)
Parameters
OFFE486BBDB884307B668F670_MAP_ProfileLoader                              1     2011-05-26 14:59:35.0     9
ORA-12899: value too large for column "SCHEMA"."O9943284818BB413E867F8DB57A5B"."ITEM_NAME_1" (actual: 42, maximum: 40)
Parameters

Found the answer. It was the database character set for multi byte character sets.

Rawtohex - How to Insert ? ORA-12899: value too large for column

Hi,
Can any one please help me to resolve the following issue ?
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Name Null? Type
ABC_OID NOT NULL RAW(8)
ABC_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30 CHAR)
UPDATE_TIME NOT NULL DATE
UPDATE_BY_WORKER_NO NOT NULL NUMBER
I'm able to insert 1st 2 records but when am inseerting 3rd one am getting error:-
insert into caps.ABC_LOOKUP values( rawtohex('SERIES'), 'SERIES','19-FEB-09','1065449')
insert into caps.ABC_LOOKUP values(rawtohex('FAMILY'),'FAMILY','19-FEB-09','1065449')
Insert into caps.ABC_LOOKUP values(rawtohex('CONNECTOR'),'CONNECTOR','19-FEB-09','1065449')
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-12899: value too large for column
"XYZ"."ABC_LOOKUP"."ABC_OID" (actual: 9, maximum: 8)
Thanks in Advance.....

Yes, Done...
Actually I suggested same thing to them (application), But they did not agree with me then i got confused :-)
Now the same thing worked well..Thanks a lot for your time

Ora-14036 error partition bound too large for column

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for