Oracle 9i 32 bit ON Windows 2003 server 32 bit

Hi all
I have oracle 9i 32 bit istalled on HP server with windows 2003 server 32 bit, 8GB ram.
I am trying to increase oracle memory size (SGA + PGA),
but when I exceed 2GB for (SGA + PGA) it gives me error (ORA-27102 : out of memory)
Is it because the windows 32bit ?
How to manage this issue?

The maximum amount of memory that can be allocated on a Windows Server 2003 is 4 Gb.
If you have Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition, it supports 32 GB of physical RAM and Windows Server 2003 Datacenter Edition supports 64 Gb by means of the Physical Address Extensions (PAE) feature.
You should declare the 3 Gb switch that is in the Boot.ini file with Microsoft Windows Server 2003 so it addresses more than 2Gb. So verify which windows 2003 server edition are you currently using.
~ Madrid
http://hrivera99.blogspot.com

Similar Messages

Installing Oracle 10.1.0.2.0 (32 bit) on windows 2003 server

Hi all,
During installation of Oracle 10.1.0.2.0 (32 bit) on windows 2003 server 64 bit standard edition there is failure in Oracle Net configuration , oracle Data Base configuration Assistance.
and i saw the log file of the installtion but its very complex and saying some Unexpected error occured and showing some coding. any suggestions about this. thanks in advance.
BEST REGARDS
Edited by: user11153253 on Jan 10, 2011 11:57 PM

user11153253 wrote:
Hi all,
During installation of Oracle 10.1.0.2.0 (32 bit) on windows 2003 server 64 bit standard edition there is failure in Oracle Net configuration , oracle Data Base configuration Assistance.
and i saw the log file of the installtion but its very complex and saying some Unexpected error occured and showing some coding. any suggestions about this. thanks in advance.
BEST REGARDS
Edited by: user11153253 on Jan 10, 2011 11:57 PMYes, I would suggest you actually show us the error message. All of our crystal balls are out for repair at this time.
"My car won't start. It makes funny sounds when I try. I looked under the hood and saw a lot of complex machinery. Any suggestions on how to start my car?"

Whether Oracle 8.1.6 Supports Windows 2003 Server/Windows 2000 Adv. Server

Dear All,
Whether Oracle 8.1.6 Supports Windows 2003 Server/Windows 2000 Adv. Server.
I tried it in windows 2003 server but i couldn't. Atlease tell me wheather it support windows 2000 adv. server. This is my first dba job.
Under Doc ID: 66397.1 saying Oracle 8.1.6 Not Support Windows NT Server 4.0 Terminal Server Edition.
Under Doc ID: 77627.1 saying Oracle 8.1.6 Supports Windows 2000 Support.
Please help me out urgently.

Since you have access to Metalink, you could be looking at the Certify tab to find this information. But, the answer is that 8.1.6 is no longer supported by Oracle. However, you should be able to install it on Win 2000 advanced server. You just can't get any support for it.
The earliest version of db supported on Win 2003 was either 9.0 or 9.2, but 9.0 is desupported now as well.

How To Migrate Databases From Windows 2003 32 bit to windows 2003 64 bit?

Hi,
How To Migrate Databases From Windows 2003 32 bit to windows 2003 64 bit?
Db Version: 10.2.0.2
Thanks,
Yusuf

Also see MOS Doc 403522.1 (How to Migrate Oracle 10.2 32bit to 10.2 64bit on Microsoft Windows)
HTH
Srini

Migration from Oracle 9i 32 bit to Oracle 10G 64 bit on Windows 2003 Server

I am working on migrating Oracle 9i 32 bit to Oracle 10G 64 bit on Windows 2003 from Old server to new server. We have db around 500 GB and 3 schemas. I installed Oracle 10G on new server, created tablespaces, schema's blah blah and now doing export and import at schema level from old server to new server.
Import is taking more than 4 to 5 hours on new server. My manager is saying, window time is bit longer and he wants me to try possiblities to make this process faster. Can some one help me on this, to use the best possible method to complete this process faster?
Will below step work, if I try?
If I install, oracle 9i and 10g both on new server in different home directories and take the hot backup from old machine and restore on new machine in 9i home directory and use the upgrade configuration assistant from 10g and do the upgrade? Pls advice.
Thanks in advance,
Hari babu
Edited by: user6367891 on Mar 2, 2010 5:28 AM

It looks good.
I have one question in below steps:
To migrate an Oracle9i or older database to an Oracle Database 10g Release 1 (10.1) database for 64-bit Windows:
1 Perform steps 1 - 11 in "Migrating an Oracle Database 10g Release 1 (10.1) Database".
2 Shut down the database on the 64-bit computer:
SQL> SHUTDOWN IMMEDIATE;
3 Start the database migration:
SQL> STARTUP MIGRATE;
4 Migrate the database as described in Chapter 3, "Upgrading a Database to the New Oracle Database 10g Release" in Oracle Database Upgrade Guide.
In step 4, it says, migrate database as described in chapter 3. In chapter 3, it says, to do the upgrade the process using dbca or manually. Pls confirm whether do the upgrade process after issuing startup migrate or not.
Thanks in advance.

EP 6.0 on Oracle 9i 32 bit for Windows 2003 server x86_64 bit env Install

We are facing issues while performing instalations of EPortal 6.0 on Windows 2003 enterprise edition server(X64 version) on AMD 64 bit processor.We have installed 32 bit Oracle software alongwith 32 bit SAP kernel 640 dumps
We had to install oracle 9.2.0.5 32 bit ,since there is no oracle
realease for oracle 9i 64 bit ,on OS windows 2003 server X_86 64 bit,after doing this when we go ahead kenel 32 bit, we faced error during database creation phase of the NW java installation.The error logs are
as follows,
ERROR 2008-04-05 23:09:27
CJS-00084 SQL statement or script failed. DIAGNOSIS: Error message:
ORA-12546: TNS:permission denied
plz respond asap

hi sm,
this seems to be an issue with the rights of the user and the DB install. check is the TNS is up and running and that the SIDADM has fill access to it. Also , have you checked the latest PAM. why are you trying to implement EP6 right now? I would suggest to go for EP7.0
regards,
Shantanu

The old allowing oracle 3GB virtual memory on windows 2003 server question?

Hi all,
I have a 9.2.0.7.0 database on windows 2003 server (32bit). 4 dual core cpu's and 16GB of Ram.
I have set .use_indirect_data_buffers=TRUE and *._enable_NUMA_optimization=FALSE.
The db_block_buffers is set at 4GB.
Shared_pool 200MB
Large_pool 56MB
Java pool 56MB
PGA is currently at 400MB
AWE_WINDOW_MEMORY is set at 720MB (which is the lowest I can set it)
At the moment there are various jobs running on the database and no users logged on and the virtual memory is at 1.8GB.
The problem is as soon as the users logs onto the DB the virtual memory goes over 2GB and we see the error 'ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 2416 bytes'.
Now I have edited the boot.ini with the following parameters:
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINNT="UBS WSP - Wintel Server Platform with PAE" /fastdetect /PAE /4GT
because the /3GB parameter switch started the server with lots of errors.
The oracle.exe process still seems unable to go over the 2GB limit with getting 'ORA-04030' errors.
Can someone tell me if I have missed anything? Or a reason why oracle is not using the switch?
TIA
Eddy

Satish,
see metalink Note:1036312.6 : Utilizing Up to 3GB Virtual Memory on Windows.
it says :
"The 32-bit versions of the Windows® 2000 Advanced Server and Windows NT Server 4.0, Enterprise Edition, operating systems were the first versions of Windows to provide applications with a 3-GB flat virtual address space, with the kernel and executive components using only 1 GB. In response to customer requests, Microsoft has expanded the availability of this support to the 32-bit version of Windows XP Professional and all 32-bit versions of Windows Server™ 2003."
of course, we mustn't be mistaken with the AWE switch (/PAE) that is not available for standard edition.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/291988 ==> tells more about what can be supported
regards,
marc

Essbase 64 bit on Windows 2003 Server: Windows Virtual cache/ Paging File ?

Hi,
the speed of our nightly calculations seems to differ from day to day between 1 and 2 hours
I am wondering, what the correct setting for the windows paging file is ?
We use Windows 2003 64 Bit Server with 16 GB RAM
We run 1 Essbase application with 80 GB pag files with 4 GB Data Cache Setting and 1 GB Indexcache Setting in EAS console - on that server is actually nothing else running in production mode (just a few essbase-test application, usually offline)
what is the recommended setting on the windows level in the windows system properties for memory usage ?
We have:
Memory Usage: Adjust for best performance of "Programs" ;
Virtual Memory/Paging file on C-Drive: Custom Size, initial Size: 10 GB, maximum size 16 GB
when system was handed over from Oracle, we had 4 GB virtual memory - however in essbase manual, you read that the recommended value should be 3-5 times the physicial ram -
for me, the cache-bevahiour is strange anyway: if I watch taskmanager, I see in the middle of our 1 hour calculation the memory usage of Esssvr.exe Service using 7 GB of RAM, then the 16 GB RAM are used up at some point (paging file is 9 GB )- then suddenly nearly all the RAM get's cleared and ESSSVR.exe memory consumption goes down to 0 and from 0 increasing again-
looks to me, as all the cache for essbase get's deleted in the miiddle of the calculation, because RAM used up for paging files ?
Can anybody explain or give a clear directions, what to check ?
our application operates normally (no abnormal termination, no generation of *.xcp files)
(Essbase is installed on the 500 GB D-Drive)

Hi John,
thanks for the helpful link - the long discussion reminded me again, that pure cores and cache is not all, what makes up a good essbase application -
I will test with calcparallel 6 (in comparison to 4) on our 64bit environment - just to see if I can achieve a 10, 20 or 30% improvement...
In addition, I must admit, that 50% of our 1-2 hour calculation is calculated in serial/ not parallel... so I expect an additional 5 to 10 min improvement, not more.
Thank you for now

Problem Oracle 10g database Installation on Windows 2003 Server

Hi All,
I am trying to face some problem to install oracle 10g database on windows 2003 server with service pack 2. Once I start to installation it give me an error "Error in writing to directory 'c:\documents and settings\administrator\local settings\temp\orainstall2004xxx'. Please ensure that this directory is writable and has at least 45MB of disk space. Installation cannot continue"
I double-insured that there is enough disk-space and I am also in the Administrators-Group.
Please guide me for the above problem although I have done oracle 9i database installation with the same configuration.
Regards
Muhammad Shoaib

898118 wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to face some problem to install oracle 10g database on windows 2003 server with service pack 2. Once I start to installation it give me an error "Error in writing to directory 'c:\documents and settings\administrator\local settings\temp\orainstall2004xxx'. Please ensure that this directory is writable and has at least 45MB of disk space. Installation cannot continue"
I double-insured that there is enough disk-space and I am also in the Administrators-Group.
Please guide me for the above problem although I have done oracle 9i database installation with the same configuration.
Regards
Muhammad ShoaibOracle really doesn't like to be installed into directories with spaces in their names.

Oracle 10G slow Performance on Windows 2003 Server

Hi there,
Looking for a little assistance in locating a bottleneck that's started to hit our system this week. It's really odd because it's been starting around 10am every morning this week.
today is the worst that I've seen it because it's almost brought the system to a halt.....
We're running Oracle 10.2.0.1 64b on Windows 2003 Server 64
The server has 16 processors and 64GB of RAM currently the CPU is sitting at 5% and the RAM usage is at 16.4GB
It's a blade server with a SAN backend and I'm assuming the latency is coming from the disk but I need to determine this for a fact.
I've only been a DBA for about a year and I'm stilling learing how to locate and identify issues. According to OEM I'm seeing
a ton of I/O from the users. So anyways, any help or insight would be much appreciated and a learning experience for me.
Thank you for your time and asistance.
SB

Thank you for the reply!
We've had finding one FOREVER, I can't resolve it and I've read somewhere to ignore because OEM is false reporting. I'm adjusting DB_Cache now...
Isn't possible that too much cache could be bad for the system and cause slow downs?
FINDING 1: 100% impact (29725 seconds)
Significant virtual memory paging was detected on the host operating system.
   RECOMMENDATION 1: Host Configuration, 100% benefit (29725 seconds)
      ACTION: Host operating system was experiencing significant paging but no
         particular root cause could be detected. Investigate processes that
         do not belong to this instance running on the host that are consuming
         significant amount of virtual memory. Also consider adding more
         physical memory to the host.
   RECOMMENDATION 2: DB Configuration, 100% benefit (29725 seconds)
      ACTION: Consider enabling Automatic Shared Memory Management by setting
         the parameter "sga_target" to control the amount of SGA consumed by
         this instance.
FINDING 2: 51% impact (15210 seconds)
The buffer cache was undersized causing significant additional read I/O.
   RECOMMENDATION 1: DB Configuration, 9% benefit (2685 seconds)
      ACTION: Increase the buffer cache size by setting the value of parameter
         "db_cache_size" to 7568 M.
   ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
      The value of parameter "db_cache_size" was "6912 M" during the analysis
      period.
   SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
      SYMPTOM: Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
               (84% impact [25073 seconds])

Install oracle E-business suite on windows 2003 server

hi ,
i am trying to install oracle EBS on windows 2003 server enterprise edition , i have installed these prerequisites :
1 - MKS Toolkit version 7.0
2 - JDK 1.3.9
3 - Visual C++ 2005 express edition
while checking the system with the startup disk , it is giving me an error :
system utilities check : - check system for make , id , ar , and cc
system utilities check : command : cmd.exe/c D:\rapidwiz\bin\checkutil.cmd C:\program files\mkstoolkit C:\program files\microsoft visual studio 8\VC
D:\rapidwiz>echo off
'which' command is not available. Check MKS installation
ERRORCODE=1 ERRORCODE_END
Error- System Utilities Availability test has returned an error: 1
anybody can help please
Regards,
Chady

What is the application release you are trying to install? Please note that 11.5.10.2 RapidWiz automatically installs JDK 1.4.2 on the Solaris, Linux, and Windows operating systems.
system utilities check : - check system for make , id , ar , and cc
system utilities check : command : cmd.exe/c D:\rapidwiz\bin\checkutil.cmd C:\program files\mkstoolkit C:\program files\microsoft visual studio 8\VCInstall all pre-req. software (i.e. Visual C++, MSK, Gnumake, ..etc) in directories which contain no space in name (i.e. C:\VC, C:\MKS, ..etc. Do NOT install it under C:\Program Files). Also, when RapidWiz prompt to enter MSK directory, type "C:\MKS\mksnt".

Oracle (64 bit) on Windows 2003 ( 64 bit )

Hi Guys,
Im trying to install Oracle Release 2 (9.2.0.2) on Windows 2003 (64 bit) , but failed. It pops up following error.
"The image file setup.exe is valid, but is for a machine type other than the current machine."
Can somebody help on this.
rgds
-ruwan

If, on the next page http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/oracle9i/htdocs/win64soft.html
you click on product certification information, you can see "Certify - Oracle's Certification Matrices".
If you choose "View Certifications by Platform", etc, and you arrive here http://www.oracle.com/technology/support/metalink/index.html
If you choose "View Certifications by Product", etc, and you arrive here http://www.oracle.com/technology/support/metalink/index.html, and you can read "32-bit/64-bit Information, read this http://www.oracle.com/technology/support/metalink/index.html.
As I well understand, on EM64T, install Windows 2003 32-bits, after what you can install Oracle 9.2.0.2 64-bits.
If anybody can confirm it...
Nicolas.

Installin Oracle 10g rel 2 on windows 2003 server

Hi
I am trying to install oracle10g on windows 2003 server standard edition SP1. When i run the OUI i get the following error.
OUI-10133:Invalid staging area. There are no top
level components for Windows Nt or Windows 2000 area. And i am not able to install.
Can somebody help in this.
Thanks

This is a problem with the media.
I suggest copying all the files to a local hard disk and running the installer from there. I don't have good luck installing from CD with Oracle's databases - not sure why. I never have a problem (and it's WAY faster) installing from disk. You can erase the 800 MB of files after the install if you need the space.

Essbase 64 bit on Windows 2003 Server: recomm. Hardware for Calcparallel ?

Hi,
1 year ago, we migrated to system 9.3.1 for Hyperion Planning - as usual, this includes Workspace, Financial Reporting, Financial Analysis, SmartView, Shared Services...
everything is running well on acceptable speed and in general 2-3 times faster than our old environment- essbase 7, planning 4 on (HP DL580 G3 windows 2003 32 bit servers, with each 4 Xeon monocores @3 Ghz)
we decided 1 year ago for 3 windows servers, each with 2 Xeon quattro-cores (=8 cores @ 3.0 Ghz)
1st server Financial Reporting + Workspace (Windows Server 2003 SP2, HP Proliant BL460C G1 with 2x Quattrocore Xeon E5450 3.0 Ghz) 8 GB RAM
2nd Server Planning+Shared Services (Windows Server 2003 SP2, HP Proliant BL460C G1 with 2x Quattrocore Xeon E5450 3.0 Ghz) 4 GB RAM (8 GB would have been better)
3rd Server 64 Bit Windows 2003 with Essbase (Windows Server 64 bit SP2, HP Proliant DL380 G5 with 2x Quattrocore Xeon X5450 3.0 Ghz) 16 GB RAM
as our planning application is quiet big and we run a lot consolidation & datacopy at night, we depend on parallel calculation.
We mainly use command calcparallel 4 - but on 64 bit system, calcparallel 7 should be possible as well
We plan now to extend the system for other regions/2nd application
My Question: the new consultant confused me today, that essbase would regard 1 physicial quattrocore processor as 1 core for parallel calculation - that a machine with just 2 physical cores is not a really powerful machine... and that we better think about new hardware- that a quattrocore is just 1 core for essbase analytics - is this true ???
so did we actually choose a weak environment with only 2 (Quattro)-cores) for Essbase ?
Can anybody confirm if there is a difference for essbase between having e.g. 4 Dualcores and 2 Quattrocores ? (Besides the fact, that it will cost more, as we have to lease a bigger Server with more processor-sockets- and that it will cost a lot efforts to get the system changed)
P.S.: EAS console shows 8 cores for the Essbase Server in properties
Applicationlogfile shows: calculating in parallel with [4] threads (we use command calcparallel 4 in businessrule)
- our nightly calculations take between 60 and 120 minutes- if we avoid fragmentation (run dense restructure every 4 weeks) and keep the system clean and lean...

Hi John,
thanks for the helpful link - the long discussion reminded me again, that pure cores and cache is not all, what makes up a good essbase application -
I will test with calcparallel 6 (in comparison to 4) on our 64bit environment - just to see if I can achieve a 10, 20 or 30% improvement...
In addition, I must admit, that 50% of our 1-2 hour calculation is calculated in serial/ not parallel... so I expect an additional 5 to 10 min improvement, not more.
Thank you for now

Install Oracle DB 32-bit on Windows 2003 Server EM64T

I need to know if i can install Oracle 10.1.0.3 32 bit or 10gR2 32 bit on Windows
Standard Edition 2003 64 with Intel Xeon -64 bit?
Tks,
Elber

You must use the 64 bit edition. Only 10gR2 64bit is certified for this platform, 10gR1 was not produced for 64 bits and the 32bit edition is not supported.
From the Certify Matrix it states "Running 32-bit applications on a 64-bit operating system is generally referred to as "Compatibility-Mode" by many AMD64/EM64T hardware vendors. Irrespective of this terminology, 32-bit Oracle Database server is *not* certified on Windows x64. For the 32-bit Oracle database client, check the certification matrix for more details.".
~ Madrid
http://hrivera99.blogspot.com/

Oracle 9i 32 bit ON Windows 2003 server 32 bit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for