Overall Performance is very slow

Hi,
I have 4GB in PI-DEV and 4GB in BI-DEV server, BI server is running very good and fast, but PI-DEV performace is very very slow even it take 5 munites to login myself...
There is no user login in DEV server... NW 7.0 2004s, Windows 2003 OS, Patch level 16. oracle 10g
Is anyone tell me step by step how do i check performacne issue... i read performance book but not that help
Thanks in Advanced...

Sorry for late Reply
Basically I have PI-DEV and BI-DEV system and both system has only 4GB memory and same location same network, same patch level 16, same kernal level, under windows 2003 server, and Oracle DB, but different instance... some reason in PI-DEV performance is very slow only Integration Engine...
when I go SXMB_MONI it take more then process 20 munites one transaction, as i maintion before
I checked both memory paramaters are same like configTools
I checked database table space
I checked heap memory paramaters
I deleted AFG_XI_MSG table entries no messages are hold
sometihng really wrong in Integration Engine

Similar Messages

SAP SNC Portal DCM screen performance is very slow and times out

Friends,
SAP SNC Portal DCM screen performance is very slow and times out when user trying to pull data using customer location
What are the cleanup activites we can do to improve the overall SNC performance ?
We did open OSS message but so far no reply from SAP , Is there any one faced performance issue ?
User/vendor is complaining about slowness , query is standard SAP and its taking more time .(table - /LIME/NTREE) , It looks like number of data are huge causing this problem related to LIME/NTREE table. What are the options to improve the performance ?
Thanks in Advance
Hanuman Choudhary

hi Team,
Pls . note the advise from SAP below, IS there any have experiance of archiveing /LIME records ?
Please advise how to start & what the steps in archiving ?
Thanks in advance
I had a look at the DCM query performance in PH1 system and figured out
that most of the time is spent at the LIME layer of database. The
following LIME tables are having far too many entries and is causing
the bottleneck during the query execution.
/LIME/NLOG_QUAN - 38,165,467
/LIME/PN_ITEM - 19,116,518
/LIME/PN_ITEM_TB - 19,154,124
These tables are storing the historical information about LIME(stock)
updates. Since these table grow with each change/update of stock
information, it will slow down the performance of the system over a
period of time. And to avoid the slow responses, the tables should
ideally be archived on a periodic basis to keep the data volume as
minimal as possible. You may have to discuss with the Business to
determine the number of days of LIME record you would want to retain
in the system. I would strongly recommend you to consider the LIME
archival retaining the minimum days (<=60 days) of historical
information. You can find more information about the Lime Archival
in the Sap Help link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm2007/helpdata/en/44/2a83121dde23d1e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm.
Kindly get in touch with your BASIS consultant for the LIME archival.
The application performance should definitely improve after the LIME
archival. Please do not hesitate to get in touch with me in case you
require any further clarification in this regards.
Best Regards

Performance is very slow

Hi Guys,
My Prod db performance is very slow..
I collected the addm report and got some sql queries which are consuming significant memory.
Below out put is from ADDM Report
FINDING 1: 45% impact (9529 seconds)
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found.
RECOMMENDATION 1: SQL Tuning, 21% benefit (4393 seconds)
ACTION: Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID
"bxkdtdywnp6xa".
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID bxkdtdywnp6xa and
PLAN_HASH 2404633280
and I just wanted to know what is the base level analysis from DBA end.
Regards,
Maddy

user11263705 wrote:
HIPatience, Grasshopper
You posted this follow-up a mere 85 minutes after your previous post.
This forum is not a chat line, and it is not paid support.
No one is responsible for monitoring it and giving a quick response.
Furthermore, it is a global forum. The person with the information you seek may very well live 20 time zones away from you and was going to bed just as you posted. He will not even see your post for several more hours.
Your original post went up in the middle of the night for half the world.
And going into a weekend, at that.
No one with the information you seek is deliberately withholding it until you sound sufficiently desperate.

Weblogic server performance is very slow and memory consumption is 99%

I am facing one critical issue with the weblogic server..
The server performance is very slow and one of the process is consuming more that 99% of the memory. Bouncing the server is not resolving the issue.
Can see the memory usage below...
Tasks: 134 total, 2 running, 132 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s):100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 7990656k total, 7947652k used, 43004k free, 9164k buffers
Swap: 16386260k total, 4691704k used, 11694556k free, 56352k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
10263 oracle 24 0 10.9g 6.5g 14m S 99.2 85.3 34:31.52 java
7409 oracle 16 0 12764 768 508 S 0.3 0.0 0:16.45 top
Can some body help me on this.
Thanks in advance.
-Prasad

Use the weblogic forum-
WebLogic Server - Upgrade / Install / Environment / Migration

Macbook pro performance is very slow

Mac book Pro system performance is very slow.

Reinstall OS X if you've never done this before:
How to Perform an Archive and Install
An Archive and Install will NOT erase your hard drive, but you must have sufficient free space for a second OS X installation which could be from 3-9 GBs depending upon the version of OS X and selected installation options. The free space requirement is over and above normal free space requirements which should be at least 6-10 GBs. Read all the linked references carefully before proceeding.
1. Be sure to use Disk Utility first to repair the disk before performing the Archive and Install.
Repairing the Hard Drive and Permissions
Boot from your OS X Installer disc. After the installer loads select your language and click on the Continue button. When the menu bar appears select Disk Utility from the Installer menu (Utilities menu for Tiger, Leopard or Snow Leopard.) After DU loads select your hard drive entry (mfgr.'s ID and drive size) from the the left side list. In the DU status area you will see an entry for the S.M.A.R.T. status of the hard drive. If it does not say "Verified" then the hard drive is failing or failed. (SMART status is not reported on external Firewire or USB drives.) If the drive is "Verified" then select your OS X volume from the list on the left (sub-entry below the drive entry,) click on the First Aid tab, then click on the Repair Disk button. If DU reports any errors that have been fixed, then re-run Repair Disk until no errors are reported. If no errors are reported click on the Repair Permissions button. Wait until the operation completes, then quit DU and return to the installer. Now restart normally.
If DU reports errors it cannot fix, then you will need Disk Warrior and/or Tech Tool Pro to repair the drive. If you don't have either of them or if neither of them can fix the drive, then you will need to reformat the drive and reinstall OS X.
2. Do not proceed with an Archive and Install if DU reports errors it cannot fix. In that case use Disk Warrior and/or TechTool Pro to repair the hard drive. If neither can repair the drive, then you will have to erase the drive and reinstall from scratch.
3. Boot from your OS X Installer disc. After the installer loads select your language and click on the Continue button. When you reach the screen to select a destination drive click once on the destination drive then click on the Option button. Select the Archive and Install option. You have an option to preserve users and network preferences. Only select this option if you are sure you have no corrupted files in your user accounts. Otherwise leave this option unchecked. Click on the OK button and continue with the OS X Installation.
4. Upon completion of the Archive and Install you will have a Previous System Folder in the root directory. You should retain the PSF until you are sure you do not need to manually transfer any items from the PSF to your newly installed system.
5. After moving any items you want to keep from the PSF you should delete it. You can back it up if you prefer, but you must delete it from the hard drive.
6. You can now download a Combo Updater directly from Apple's download site to update your new system to the desired version as well as install any security or other updates. You can also do this using Software Update.
An even better choice is to wipe the drive and reinstall Leopard from scratch. Make a backup first, then restore your files from the backup.

My performance is very slow when I run graphs. How do I increase the speed at which I can do other things while the data is being updated and displayed on the graphs?

I am doing an an aquisition and displaying the data on graphs. When I run the program it is slow. I think because I have the number of scans to read associated with my scan rate. It takes the number of seconds I want to display on the chart times the scan rate and feeds that into the number of samples to read at a time from the AI read. The problem is that it stalls until the data points are aquired and displayed so I cannot click or change values on the front panel until the updates occur on the graph. What can I do to be able to help this?

On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 11:55:03 -0500 (CDT), HAL wrote:
>My performance is very slow when I run graphs. How do I increase the
>speed at which I can do other things while the data is being updated
>and displayed on the graphs?
>
>I am doing an an aquisition and displaying the data on graphs. When I
>run the program it is slow. I think because I have the number of
>scans to read associated with my scan rate. It takes the number of
>seconds I want to display on the chart times the scan rate and feeds
>that into the number of samples to read at a time from the AI read.
>The problem is that it stalls until the data points are aquired and
>displayed so I cannot click or change values on the front panel until
>the updates occur on the graph. What can I do to be a
ble to help
>this?
It may also be your graphics card. LabVIEW can max the CPU and you
screen may not be refreshing very fast.
--Ray
"There are very few problems that cannot be solved by
orders ending with 'or die.' " -Alistair J.R Young

Gmail performance is very slow in Firefox 4.

Gmail performance is very slow in Firefox 4 and much slower when compared to performance in Firefox 3.6.x After clicking a button within the Gmail interface (e.g. refresh, opening an email, sending an email etc.) there is a noticeable wait time in Firefox 4. In Firefox 3.6 and actually in any/all previous versions of Firefox, this was not the case. Using same machine for Firefox 4 as I was for Firefox 3.x. Dell Inspiron Laptop E6400, Dual core Intel 2 GHz, 3.5 GB RAM, 80 GB free HDD space, 32-bit Windows XP SP3. Gmail is set to use HTTPS always.

Hi GoldMoon,
(1)
Refer to your last posting, seems that you've created index which wouldn't help your query performance.
You need to create index from the field which supplied from your 'WHERE' condition. So if I follow your initial posting in this thread, your index should contains:
- BUKRS (which will be compared with your company variable)
- PRCTR (which will be compared with your s_prctr variable)
- GJAHR (which will be compared with your s_year variable)
- HKONT (which will be compared with your glcode value in your it_final[])
- BUDAT (which will be compared with your s_budat range/select option.
And to follow the BSIS field order, the above index field need to be arranged as follow
- BUKRS
- HKONT
- GJAHR
- BUDAT
- PRCTR
(2).
Try not to use 'INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS' as it will increase table-memory overhead, but use 'INTO' and make sure the field list and internal table fields is in the same order.
So, once the index has been created, and 'INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS' has been changed to 'INTO' your selection should looks like this:
IF NOT it_final[] IS INITIAL.
SELECT bukrs
          hkont
          augdt
          augbl
          zuonr
          gjahr
          belnr
          buzei
          budat
          werks
          kostl
          aufnr
          shkzg
          dmbtr
          prctr
    FROM bsis
     INTO TABLE it_bseg
      FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_final
WHERE bukrs eq company
    AND hkont eq it_final-glcode
    AND gjahr eq s_year
    AND budat in s_budat
    AND prctr eq s_prctr.
ENDIF.
Hope it helps

Database performance is very slow

Hi DBA's
Plz help me out !!!
Application users complaining database performance is very slow. Its an 10g DB in IBM AIx Server.
Any changes needed pls be post as soon as possible
Buffer Cache Hit Ratio 94.69
Chained Row Ratio 0
Database CPU Time Ratio 17.21
Database Wait Time Ratio 82.78
Dictionary Cache Hit Ratio 99.38
Execute Parse Ratio -25.6
Get Hit Ratio 70.62
Latch Hit Ratio 99.65
Library Cache Hit Ratio 99.43
Parse CPU to Elapsed Ratio 8.4
Pin Hit Ratio 81.6
Soft-Parse Ratio 94.29
=====================================
NAME TYPE VALUE
cursor_sharing string EXACT
cursor_space_for_time boolean FALSE
nls_currency string
nls_dual_currency string
nls_iso_currency string
open_cursors integer 600
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
session_cached_cursors integer 20
sql92_security boolean FALSE
===========================================================
lock_sga boolean FALSE
pre_page_sga boolean FALSE
sga_max_size big integer 4272M
sga_target big integer 4G
pga_aggregate_target big integer 2980M
Total Ram Size is 8 GB

SQL> select username,sid from v$session where username='WPCPRODUSR';
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 378
WPCPRODUSR 379
WPCPRODUSR 380
WPCPRODUSR 381
WPCPRODUSR 382
WPCPRODUSR 383
WPCPRODUSR 384
WPCPRODUSR 385
WPCPRODUSR 386
WPCPRODUSR 387
WPCPRODUSR 388
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 389
WPCPRODUSR 390
WPCPRODUSR 391
WPCPRODUSR 392
WPCPRODUSR 393
WPCPRODUSR 394
WPCPRODUSR 395
WPCPRODUSR 396
WPCPRODUSR 397
WPCPRODUSR 398
WPCPRODUSR 399
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 400
WPCPRODUSR 401
WPCPRODUSR 402
WPCPRODUSR 403
WPCPRODUSR 404
WPCPRODUSR 405
WPCPRODUSR 406
WPCPRODUSR 407
WPCPRODUSR 408
WPCPRODUSR 409
WPCPRODUSR 410
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 411
WPCPRODUSR 412
WPCPRODUSR 413
WPCPRODUSR 414
WPCPRODUSR 415
WPCPRODUSR 416
WPCPRODUSR 417
WPCPRODUSR 418
WPCPRODUSR 419
WPCPRODUSR 420
WPCPRODUSR 421
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 422
WPCPRODUSR 423
WPCPRODUSR 424
WPCPRODUSR 425
WPCPRODUSR 426
WPCPRODUSR 427
WPCPRODUSR 428
WPCPRODUSR 429
WPCPRODUSR 430
WPCPRODUSR 431
WPCPRODUSR 432
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 433
WPCPRODUSR 434
WPCPRODUSR 435
WPCPRODUSR 436
WPCPRODUSR 437
WPCPRODUSR 438
WPCPRODUSR 439
WPCPRODUSR 440
WPCPRODUSR 441
WPCPRODUSR 442
WPCPRODUSR 443
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 444
WPCPRODUSR 445
WPCPRODUSR 446
WPCPRODUSR 447
WPCPRODUSR 448
WPCPRODUSR 449
WPCPRODUSR 450
WPCPRODUSR 451
WPCPRODUSR 452
WPCPRODUSR 453
WPCPRODUSR 454
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 455
WPCPRODUSR 456
WPCPRODUSR 457
WPCPRODUSR 458
WPCPRODUSR 459
WPCPRODUSR 460
WPCPRODUSR 461
WPCPRODUSR 462
WPCPRODUSR 463
WPCPRODUSR 464
WPCPRODUSR 465
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 466
WPCPRODUSR 467
WPCPRODUSR 468
WPCPRODUSR 469
WPCPRODUSR 470
WPCPRODUSR 471
WPCPRODUSR 472
WPCPRODUSR 473
WPCPRODUSR 474
WPCPRODUSR 475
WPCPRODUSR 476
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 477
WPCPRODUSR 478
WPCPRODUSR 479
WPCPRODUSR 480
WPCPRODUSR 481
WPCPRODUSR 482
WPCPRODUSR 483
WPCPRODUSR 484
WPCPRODUSR 485
WPCPRODUSR 486
WPCPRODUSR 487
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 488
WPCPRODUSR 489
WPCPRODUSR 490
WPCPRODUSR 491
WPCPRODUSR 492
WPCPRODUSR 493
WPCPRODUSR 494
WPCPRODUSR 495
WPCPRODUSR 496
WPCPRODUSR 497
WPCPRODUSR 498
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 499
WPCPRODUSR 500
WPCPRODUSR 501
WPCPRODUSR 502
WPCPRODUSR 503
WPCPRODUSR 504
WPCPRODUSR 505
WPCPRODUSR 506
WPCPRODUSR 507
WPCPRODUSR 508
WPCPRODUSR 509
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 510
WPCPRODUSR 511
WPCPRODUSR 512
WPCPRODUSR 513
WPCPRODUSR 514
WPCPRODUSR 515
WPCPRODUSR 516
WPCPRODUSR 517
WPCPRODUSR 518
WPCPRODUSR 519
WPCPRODUSR 520
USERNAME SID
WPCPRODUSR 521
WPCPRODUSR 522
WPCPRODUSR 523
WPCPRODUSR 524
WPCPRODUSR 525
148 rows selected.

SM performance is very slow

Dear Experts,
We are facing an issue with SM tool’s performance is very slow.
It is taking minimum of 4 mins time to open a sm and when open/raise a CR, previously in OVSC it used to take only 20 seconds of time.
It’s not only about the raising of CR it’s with all the modules in the tool.
We are facing slowness issue both thin client and web client.
Please suggect any remedy to fix the issue.
Thanks&Regards,
Tools Team

Hello,
The specific forum is dealing with printing software for Macintosh envoirnment.
It seems our topic is more related to the Windows OS and I would assume a server envoirnment.
I suggest posting your question in the commercial forums which should be more suitable for a such:
http://h30499.www3.hp.com/hpeb/
Best of luck,
Shlomi
Say thanks by clicking the Kudos thumb up in the post.
If my post resolve your problem please mark it as an Accepted Solution

Performance is very slow, i continue to get the spinning color wheel whenever i try anything (email, browser, word, etc) any ideas

Performance is very slow.
I continue to get the spinning color wheel on whatever I try.
It doesnt matter if its an email, browser or document of any kind it takes several seconds for anything to happen.

Hello, see how many of these you can answer...
See if the Disk is issuing any S.M.A.R.T errors in Disk Utility...
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH7029
Open Activity Monitor in Applications>Utilities, select All Processes & sort on CPU%, any indications there?
How much RAM & free space do you have also, click on the Memory & Disk Usage Tabs.
Open Console in Utilities & see if there are any clues or repeating messages when this happens.
In the Memory tab, are there a lot of Pageouts?

Mail has 16k messages, and performance is very slow, with loading times taking up to 5 seconds every time I open Mail. How can I increase performance?

Mail has 16k messages, and performance is very slow, with loading times taking up to 5 seconds every time I open Mail.
How can I increase performance?
I'm running a MacBook Air 4GB 1.7GHz 10.7.2.
Graham

One possible solution would be to organise your inbox into folders.
Its never relly good on any system to have one folder that has everything in it.
Try going to you web gui for that mail account and organise your folders and move mails from your inbox into corresponding folders for better organisation.
Several folders containing the same amount of one folder will usually load a little quicker as the folder may not be accessed to download its content unless veiwed.
So having 10 folders with organised content, and you inbox as an area thats to hold only new emails would work much much quicker with imap.
Most imap servers will only update the contents of a folder when its veiwed.

XMLHttpRequest performance is very slow

I'm noticing that the performance of XMLHttpRequest is very slow. I was seeing poor overall request performance in my Extension, so I wrote a simple test Extension that issues a GET request to fetch an image available on the Adobe homepage. This request takes 6-7 seconds to execute. If I issue the same request from the Chrome browser on my machine, it only takes around 300ms. This behavior is consistently repeatable - requests using the Extension's XMLHttpRequest library always seem to take at least 6-7 seconds to execute. Interestingly, if I use the Node.js http library to issue the request from within my Extension, the performance is comparable to the browser (around 300-400ms).
Has anyone else noticed this slow performance of XMLHttpRequest? Can anything be done about it? I can provide some example code if that would be of any use.
I am running these tests with Illustrator CC 2014 on a Win 7 x64 box.

Thanks for the response. Just to clarify - are you saying that your extension is/contains an ExpressJS app, or that it acts as a client to one? In either case, I think this means that any http requests issued from the extension would use the Node.js http module (either directly or via a wrapper/higher-level module). Is that correct? If so, that matches with what I saw - http requests using the Node http module performed just fine.
I only had problems (slowness) when I instead tried to issue requests using the "browser native" XMLHttpRequest library that's included in the CEP. My extension needs to re-use some code that is written to use the XHR library, so it is non-trivial to switch everything over to using the Node http module. That said, we're still looking into it.

CQ5 server performance is very slow ?

Hello,
I deployed my project on publish server, but both the server responding very slow, Is it the CQ5 server the very slow?
Please let me know how to make more faster performance of CQ5 server, please let me know is there any configration we have to do?
For showing the page around it takes 10min, how to solve such issues.
Please let me know any perfoamance tuning guide/tricks.
Regards,
Satish

For starters answers to a few questions would help:
1. What kind of hardware config is in place? (RAM, disk-space)
2. Which OS are you running instances? Are both author and publish on same machine?
3. Have you checked error logs?
From the problem description you have provided 1st seems to be the main issue.
- Ashish

BO Cluster Performance is Very slow

Hi All,
We have installed BO servers in cluster with the following hardware configuration and the peformance of the application login and accessing the content is very very slow.
Please share your tips to improve performance of application login and accessing reports.
This is new server hence no users at the movement. I'm login CMC/BI as a Administrator and tis taking lot of time to show homepage,server list, users list.
Two servers details:
Each one has Win2012 OS R2
Each one has RAM 40GB
Each one 6 core processors
Each one has local disk 100 GB
Both has cluster storage 100gb for frs
Back end database SYBASE ASE- 100 GB,11GB RAM
Network bandwidth 10GB

Hi S K,
Try below
1 ) Tomcat Parameter Changes
     --> Start > programs > Tomcat > tomcat config > Java > Java Options > Change parameter                      value from -XX:MaxPermSize=384M to 512M
     --> Start > programs > Tomcat > tomcat config > Java > maximum memory allocation 2048
2) Make sure java version is compatible with BO , try java 7 Update 21 or 45 to get max support.
3) Enable "Keep Temp files on your computer" in java --> General --> Settings ->
4) Reduce Security from High to Medium in Java --> Security
5) For content go with Webi Processing Server clone with below values
     Unv Cache Max SIze : 50
     Max Connections : 25
     Enable Memory Analysis
     Lower Threshold : 10000
     Upper : 12000
     Max : 16000
     O/P Cache Dir : Provide path by naming it as Webicahchedir
     Images Directory: Provide path by naming it as Webicahchedir
     Max Doc cache Size (KB) : 2000000
6) Cross check Java heap size for all custom (Split) Adaptive Processing Servers to make sure it has enough memory to get expected performance.
7) If your Java Web server (Tomcat) is running on dedicated cluster (Node) try to restart server and observe Tomcat Process performance in Task Mgr.
Thanks,
Raju

Combobox performance is very slow

Hello,
Can anyone please provide some suggestions on my issue. I have implemented a combobox item using the plugin below and it was a very helpful plugin.
http://www.apex-plugin.com/oracle-apex-plugins/odtug-competition/combobox_208.html
My issue is my data is very huge around 145k records and the page load is taking time and also the combobox is also very slow. I have a address field on which I have implemented the combobox plugin. My requirement is users login to the application and will search the application to find a particular customer account using the address. So the users once they login, they will directly start typing the address to find the customer account.
Please help, with any valuable suggestions to help improve the performance of the combobox item.
Thanks,
Orton

orton607 wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone please provide some suggestions on my issue. I have implemented a combobox item using the plugin below and it was a very helpful plugin.
http://www.apex-plugin.com/oracle-apex-plugins/odtug-competition/combobox_208.html
My issue is my data is very huge around 145k records and the page load is taking time and also the combobox is also very slow. I have a address field on which I have implemented the combobox plugin. My requirement is users login to the application and will search the application to find a particular customer account using the address. So the users once they login, they will directly start typing the address to find the customer account.
Please help, with any valuable suggestions to help improve the performance of the combobox item.
Thanks,
OrtonThere won't be any issue with data because 145k is nothing, I have setup an example here on half million records (500k) and it works fine
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=1983:27
login as test/test
As you have more data in the table I guess you have set the Lazy Load to Yes.
you have to do explain plan on your LOV sql and see if you can add an index on the address column.
Thanks,
Vikram

Overall Performance is very slow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for