Partition Table Looks Different Between OSX and Windows 7

Hey all,
I recently replaced the hard drive on my 2007 iMac, going from the 320GB drive to a 1 TB drive. It actually worked! The previous drive was failing in very odd ways, though booting into the Windows side (more on dual boot later) always seemed to work, and S.M.A.R.T. always reported that the physical drive seemed OK.
The previous drive (320 GB) had around 200GB devoted to OSX and 100GB partitioned off for a working Windows 7 installation (custom installed x64 Win7 Ultimate). I had the Windows system image backed up to my NAS, and had a Windows system bootable disc to restore that image.
After replacing the drive (and almost crying that I had actually done it right), I first restored OSX from a Time Machine backup, and let it take the full 1TB of space as Journalled HFS+. Then, I used Disk Utility to shrink OSX down to 500GB, and created a second partition (formatted to NTFS) with the remaining 500GB.
Now, restoring a Windows system image is an odd thing, as it tries to do a lot of partition work as opposed to simply restoring the Windows install to a partition. I tried Macrium Reflect first (made a backup in that, too), and it looked like it was going to let me restore to the second partition. It completed the restore...and the entire hard drive was hosed. Partitions had been moved, renamed, resized, and nothing was bootable. I had to use Recovery from an external USB thumb drive to go back to the single, full-drive install of OSX.
Then I tried again. Made the second NTFS partition and used the basic Windows System Restore disk to restore from the standard system image I had on the NAS. I was not expecting this to work. But it did. Windows started showing up in Startup Manager when "option" was pressed on bootup, and both OSX and Windows booted properly and ran fine. This is where I (finally) get to the supreme oddities:
OSX Disk Utility still reports two 500GB partitions, one for OSX and one for Windows.
In OSX the Windows partition shows as having NO DATA on it. Not sure what would happen if I tried to write a file to it when mounted, but there is no data on it when viewed from OSX (I was always able to see the Windows files when I mounted that partition on the previous drive).
The Windows partition does not show up as a valid bootable system in System Prefs --> Startup Disk (naturally, I suppose, since OSX doesn't think there is anything there).
From the WINDOWS side, Windows still sees the old partition table: 200GB for the "unknown" HFS partition, and then the rest of the space can be devoted to Windows (started as 100GB, but I was ablt to expand it to use the remaining ~750GB!).  Windows thinks it can have 750GB of space even though I know its partition is only 500GB in size!
Windows cannot see the OSX HFS partition data using HFSExplorer. It CAN see the HFS partition on the attached backup drive (the drive I use for Time Machine).
GParted (a partition program on a Linux bootabld CD-ROM) shows the same partitions as OSX Disk Utility (2x500GB), and also thinks the Windows NTFS partition is empty (all space reports as "unused").
Did I mention both OSX and Windows work fine???
There are, of course, two other partitions on the drive: the first partition is the 200MB one I always see (EFI/GUID portion?), and then between the HFS and NTFS partitions is the 600MB recovery partition (which also shows at option-pressed boot time). OSX, GParted, and Windows see all four partitions, and in the same order. It is just that Windows sees the wrong sizes, and OSX cannot see any data in the Windows partition.
Surely this is all going to break spectacularly at some point, isn't it? What if I ever did write a file to the Windows side from OSX, or what if OSX starts taking more space than the 200GB Windows thinks is the max for that partition? What if I try to make Windows use more than 500GB because it thinks it has almost 800GB to use? What if I defrag the Windows drive?
I had no idea a partition table could look this goofy and yet still have everything be bootable and workable. Is there something I can do to get everything in sync? Basically, I am assuming I need to get Windows to do some low-level kung fu in Disk Manager in order to properly get everything lined up with the "right" partitions as reported by both GParted and OSX Disk Utility. But how do I do that?
By the way, any ideas that totally nuke the drive and start from scratch are completely fine (if it seems like they are doing something different enough that I'd give it a try). I have good backups of both OSX and Windows and have restored them about a half dozen times already as I dealt with the previous failing hard drive and with trying to get dual-boot working again. Not to mention, this iMac is now my secondary machine to the new Mac Mini I got a couple weeks back when I wasn't sure how much more life I was going to get from this 6+ year old iMac.
Thanks for listening to me ramble about this very odd issue, and a huge THANK YOU in advance to anyone who has ideas to help.
Thanks,
sutekh138

Update:
I am pretty sure the issue is a simple GPT/MBR discrepancy.
I installed rEFIt and used it's partitioning tool (gptsync built in) upon bootup. It was able to show the GPT table and the MBR table, but it thinks the second partition of the drive (the Mac OSX bootable partition) is "extended" in the MBR table and says "will not touch this disk."
However, it does look like an MBR sync should be straightforward, as there four partitions in the GPT table and four in the MBR (and MBR allows a max of four, AFAIK). I just need gptsync to relax some rules. I found a link to a supposedly newer version of gptsync compiled for OSX, so I will try that later.
First, I will try Partition Wizard, a free tool I found for the Windows side. It has a "Repair MBR" option that I would have tried last night if I weren't running a new Windows Image Backup in case all of this goes haywire.  *smile*  The PW tool also has an option to change the MBR over to GPT entirely. That might work, but then I am not sure Windows 7 will boot (from what I read, x64 Win7 running on EFI-enabled hardware should work, but who knows).
Anyway, I will try the following things, in order, until something works, when I get home tonight:
From Windows, run Partition Wizard and try "Repair MBR".
From OSX, download recent gptsync and try to run it.
From Windows, use Partition Wizard to do a full MBR --> GPT conversion.
Nuke the Windows partition in OSX Disk Utility, expand the HFS partition to take up the whole drive, and then add a Windows-bootable partition via Boot Camp-ish command line commands (diskutil). Because if nothing else works, I have to assume I just created the partitions wrong in the first place such that a Windows restore miraculously works, but the partition weirdness is just a timebomb waiting to happen.
Finally, if none of the above work, I'll just get things back to the way they now work and wait for the timebomb to (possibly never) go off.  *smile*
I'll update this thread if I get something figured out, in case anyone else stumbles upon it...
Thanks,
sutekh138

Similar Messages

  • I want to partition an external device for OSX and Windows.  Opened Disk utility but Partition is not an option

    I want to partition an external drive for OSX and PC.  Went to Disk Utility but Partition is not an available option.

    Why not? does the partition tab not exist?

  • JPG exchange between OSX and Windows

    I have to set up an efficient way to allow my clients to browse through hundreds (and more) fotos on their computer (some on Mac, more often on Windows) and rate them with 1 to 5 stars. What’s the best software to let me set up the fotos on my side, give the fotos a first rating, let the customer do their choices and send it back to me with their markings?
    I am on OSX Lion, I have Adobe Bridge as my main organizing tool, I have iPhoto, too, but already between Bridge and iPhoto the recognition of stars doesn’t work. I cannot expect my client to buy the Adobe Creative Suite and I am not sure if Bridge exists as a stand-alone.
    Thank you for your help
    cheers
    Goso

    > FreeHand files are cross-platform, which means that the
    same files can be
    > opened by both platforms.
    Windows version recognizes the version by the file name
    extension. FHMX (v.11) file for example is .fh11.
    Usually this works fine - just a few days ago I opend Mac
    FHMX files in PC.
    Note that Windows version may have problems in printing
    (linked) mac binary eps files.
    Jukka

  • Titles templates a different between MAC and Windows

    Adobe is very incompetent on delivering content.My company is considering moving to the windows version, so we create this Windows server to host only Premiere Pro CS6. Well, the Titles are not there (trial version), so we download the file, unzip it, and copied it to the right place. But we discover that the CS6 Mac Version has a very different list of titles templates, so we simply cannot do our work in Windows. Furthermore, what several have noticed is true. The window fails to scroll or preview correctly, and the majority of the titles are ugly, not like in the MAC. In fact, it seems like they don't want to offer the same titles in the Trial Version than in the licensed version, at least this is what it looks like. It is a mistake, because how do you evaluate a version without the titles? They have to offer the same exact titles for both operating systems.
    The question is, how do we transfer our Title Presets from our MAC Licensed version to the Windoes Trial version?

    Please don't double-post.  I deleted your duplicate post.
    Jeff

  • Partitioning Internal Hard Drive between Mac and Windows

    So I receently ordered a new MacBook to replace my old PC and my old Mac. With 2 GB of Video Ram (With the Nvidia 750M), I was hoping to be able to run my Steam Games decently (I understand that a Mac isn't going to run on max graphics or anything, but I figure it will do alright) using Boot Camp.
    My question is how would you guys recommend partitioning the 1 TB internal drive? I was hoping for a Mac and a PC System Partition with the majority of the storage space left as "shared" between them (I use Paragon NTFS for Mac, and MacDrive for PC, so I'm not sure what format would be most stable for the shared storage). What do you guys recommend?

    Well,  let me start by saying that with the default Boot Camp tools, you probably won't be able to setup more than the 2 OS partitions on the internal drive of your notebook.  Not that it can't be done with other tools, but it is not a quick and easy setup to do, so if you are going to undertake it, please be prepared for issues, and do it from the beginning.  There is a decent thread on this forum about "repairing after you change your partitions" which has plenty of information about the problems you will be facing and how to work around most of them.
    Having said that, when I was using Boot Camp on my MBP with a 750GB drive, I gave 500GB to MacOS, and 250GB to Windows 7.  I also used Paragon's NTFS for MacOS driver, and Paragon's HFS+ for Windows driver (after having use MacDrive for several years).  This combination allowed both OSes full access to the entire 750GB drive, and I put my Thunderbird and FireFox profiles on the MacOS partition, but could access them from either OS that was booted.  That solution worked great for me for years (until I upgraded my MBP and opted to eliminate Boot Camp and only run VMs for Windows).
    With the proper drivers, either OS would be able to utilize your external drives, but keep in mind there are still some Mac utilities/apps which will only work with an HFS+ formatted partition,  just like there are some Windows programs that do the same with NTFS.  Personally I found that I would have to "share" my external drives with other Windows users more than Mac users, so I formatted most of mine NTFS, and just took the minor performance hit when accessing them under MacOS.

  • Versions of Muse different between Mac and Windows

    Me and a friend wanted to test Adobe Muse and we installed the 30 days trial version. I did it on my Mac. My friend on his Windows PC. I've tried Muse and when I wanted to show what I did to my friend, I went to him with the .muse file on a USB stick. We where very surprised that the Muse on the Windows PC couldn't open the file I've made on my Mac due to versioning problems. We compared the Muse versions and ... they are different (on Mac: 2014.2.0.569, CL 787027; on Windows: V 7.4 build 30, CL 784238). This is a problem since we wanted to develop both on the same site, of course not at the same time, but by passing the .muse file to one another.
    Is this normal that versions between platforms are not in sync?
    Thanks for answering!
    Marc Verschueren.

    Hi Marc,
    The version of Muse in the windows machine of your friend is not the latest release, this could be because of previous installation or the technical specification of the windows machine is not met.
    Please verify the system requirement for windows for CC 2014 release :
    http://helpx.adobe.com/muse/system-requirements.html#Muse CC system requirements
    Regards,
    Akshay

  • Supported resolution different between OSX and XP

    Hey guys,
    I have a proview PL576Ws 15.4" widescreen connected to my macbook pro.
    It supports up to a 1280x800 resolution but only in Windows XP, when I try to get it to display 1280x800 in Mac OSX Leopard it claims "MODE NOT SUPPORTED" and fails to display anything.
    I have tried to use the utility SwicthResX in osx but it doesn't seem to work, even though I am staring at in at 1280x800 right now, writing this post.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks in advance for your help.

    Easiest way - Connect printer to Mac and Add in printer Setup. In Sharing Prefs, turn on Windows Sharing and Printer Sharing.
    On the PC Add the printer (should be able to browse to see it). Here's the twist - change the driver on the PC so you send postscript to the Mac. Apple Color laserwriter xx is a good driver, already included on Win XP.
    Good luck.

  • Audio sync different between QuickTime and Windows Media Player

    I've run into a new problem I've never encountered before. When playing a video on QuickTime on a Windows PC, the audio is in perfect sync. However, when I play the same QT video on Windows Media Player, the audio is out of sync by as much as three seconds. The Windows software is current. The source content is created using ProTools 10 on a Mac running Yosemite, from an original QT mp4 converted to a .mov via quicktime for import into ProTools. The output was a standard .mov. I also tried converting it to an mp4 via QT, but the result was the same.
    This is a pretty alarming discovery as I now have to test any videos bounced from ProTools on a PC Windows Media Player to make sure someone doesn't view it this way, with the audio sync appearing incorrectly.
    Anybody know why this happened? Or how to prevent it in the future?

    you can buy and use the WMV Studio windows media export components from Flip4Mac which wil allow you to export to a windows media format directly from FCP and other suitable QT compliant apps ...
    or you can copy the file over onto your own quicktime enabled PC and use the free, and much faster, windows media encoder there.

  • Why do fonts looks different between Photoshop and devexpress winform

    Hi,
    I am creating a mock ups in PSD using font Verdana 10
    when the developers using the same font on DevExpress win-forms the results looks extreme different.
    can you help me understand why this is happening?
    Thanks a lot,
    Anat

    The glyphs are described by mathematical functions, there is no ambiguity if it is the same font.
    If the text is immediately embedded as a raster graphic (opposed to keeping text as vector in
    an exported PDF), then it is impossible to represent the accurate shape by only few pixels
    (10pt, 72ppi: very few pixels; 10pt, 288ppi; four times more in both directions).
    Therefore Photoshop can apply anti-aliasing: None, Sharp, Crisp, Strong, Smooth. The names
    don't say much, but the appearance is different. You may try which mode is your best choice.
    Best regards --Gernot Hoffmann

  • Performance between two partitionned tables with different structure

    Hi,
    I would like if there is a difference between two partitionned tables with different structure in term of performance (access, query, insertions, updates ).
    I explain myself in detail :
    I have a table that stores one value every 10 minutes in a day (so we have 144 values (24*6) in the whole day), with the corresponding id.
    Here is the structure :
    | Table T1 |
    + id PK |
    + date PK |
    + sample1 |
    + sample2 |
    + ... |
    + sample144 |
    The table is partionned on the column date, with a partionned every months. The primary key is based on the columns (id, date).
    There is an additionnal index on the column (id) (is it useful ?).
    I would like to know if it is better to have a table with just (id, date, value) , so for one row in the first table we'll have 144 rows in the future? table. The partition will already be on the columns (id, date) with the index associated.
    What are the gains or loss in performance with this new structure ( access, DMLs , storage ) ?
    I discuss with the Java developers and they say it is simpler to manage in their code.
    Oracle version : Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
    Thanks & Regards
    From France
    Oliver
    Edited by: 998239 on 5 avr. 2013 01:59

    I mean storage in tablespaces and datafiles on disk.
    Can you justify please and give me concrete arguments why the two structures are equivalent ( except inserting data in T(id, date,value))
    because i have to make a report.i didnt say any thing like
    two structures are equivalent ( except inserting data in T(id, date,value)i said
    About structure : TABLE1(id, date, value) is better than TABLE1(id, date, sample1, .... sample144)because
    1) oracle has restriction for numbers of column. Ok you can have 144 columns now but for future if you must have more than 1000 columns , what will you do?
    2) Restrictions on Table Compression (Table compression is not supported for tables with more than 255 columns.)
    3) store same type values on diffrent columns is bad practise
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/schema.htm#i4383
    i remember i seen Toms article about this but now i cant find it sorry ((( if i found i will post here

  • Ho do I use one monitor for OSX and Windows 8.1 bootcamp

    I am a long time Mac user, but find the fairly recent Apple switch to thunderbolt for monitor input very frustrating.
    For several years I have ran a Mid 2010 IMac 27" and input video from a Mac Mini running Boot Camp Windows 7 using Target Display Mode on the IMac. 
    This worked fine until I upgraded to a Late 2013 27" IMac and discovered that the  IMac has moved to thunderbolt as the input for Target Display Mode.  The new late 2013 27" IMac just will not display native Windows 7 or 8 from a Boot Camp Mac anymore.
    My problem is that I have two business/job related Windows apps that must run on a native windows 7 or 8 platform, and won't function under either Parallels or VMWare Fusion.
    I have tried. 
    And there appears to be no way to get any Windows machine with DVI or Mini Display Port output to drive a late 2013 IMac in Target Display mode.
    So, with great frustration, I have concluded that I need to purchase a non-Apple 27-30" monitor, and drive it with either a Mac Mini, or my Early 2013 15" MacBook Pro retina, running one of the Macs into on of the mini-Display Ports on the monitor and a native Windows 7 or 8 machine into a second mini-display port, switching between the two video inputs.   The Dell 30" monitor seems to get the nod.
    Has anyone found a better solution to switching between OSX and native Windows on one monitor?
    Thanks...

    Hi William,
    I had the same experience in December 2013 and contacted Apple about it. According to Apple it's an issue of Windows with Thunderbolt. Your older iMac from 2010 is using DisplayPort and not Thunderbolt for the Target Display Mode. Note that just the connector looks the same but it's still a different technology. Please further note that the response below does not apply for the new iMac 27" with the 5K display because this iMac does not support Target Display Mode at all, hence can't be used as external display. Of course you can still attach one or two external displays to the iMac 27" 5K.
    Hope this clears things up for you and the others.
    Thanks,
    Martin
    So, here is the important part of the official response from Apple:
    "... The Thunderbolt controller in an iMac is running exclusively in host mode. As such it cannot emulate a device mode Thunderbolt display. Instead it implements a custom Target Display Mode protocol that shares video between two peer to peer machines running with both controllers running in host mode. The "client" side of the driver does not exist on Windows so windows cannot speak to the "server" half in the iMac. There are no plans to implement a client driver for Windows since there is no Thunderbolt SW stack available for Windows. The reason this used to work is that the older iMacs used DisplayPort for Target Display Mode. In this scenario the iMac was able to expose the panel in such a way that it looked exactly like a Display Port Device which Windows does have driver support for. ... "
    Target Display Mode: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) - Apple Support

  • File transfer between Mac and Windows

    I am running Windows on my Mac and I transfer files between mac and Windows alot using my external hard drive. I was wondering if there was an easier way to do this than having to use my external hard drive like a networking solution or something. Thanks...

    i also run windows on my mac (for work). The issue i had was that when booted in osx, i could see the windows partition, and copy files FROM it to the mac side, but i could not copy files TO the windows partition.
    As i understand it, this is because the apple NTFS driver (to read the windows partition) only allows read access (not read and write access). It was easily solved with MacFuse (which is an open source way to add different disk file systems to your mac, kind of like teaching it a new language), and NTFS-3G for mac osx.
    http://macntfs-3g.blogspot.com/
    scroll down a bit for the download link. The installer will put in MacFuse and NTFS-3G, so it's the only one you need.
    After a reboot, i can read/write to the windows partition while booted into macosx (and it's free).
    i hope that helps.
    p.s. the efi boot manager download is NOT required.

  • Share files between Mac and Windows in same iMac with boot camp

    Hello,
    I am new in using Mac and recently I buy a IMac 24" model.
    I used to use PC a long time with a lot of old document.
    I want to install Windows XP with boot camp.
    But I also want to share my documents, music, video files between Mac and Windows in same iMac.
    How can I do this?
    Thanks in advance,
    Eric

    Hi Eric and welcome to Discussions and the Apple world.
    Mac OSX can read and write from Windows partitions (like the BootCamp Windows partition you are about to create) when using FAT32 as file system for Windows.
    However with FAT32 you are limited to a partition size of 32GB.
    Mac OSX can also read from Windows partitions that uses the NTFS file system, but it can not write to them unless you use a third-party helper like either Paragons NTFS for Mac http://www.paragon-software.com/home/ntfs-mac/ or NTFS-3G http://www.ntfs-3g.org/
    Windows can not even see or use a Mac OSX partition without additional help by MacDrive http://www.mediafour.com/products/macdrive/
    Regards
    Stefan

  • Data Doubler - Format for both OSX and Windows 7 to read/write?

    Hello! I have a Mid-2012 MacBook Pro 13" and I've ordered the OWC Data Doubler with a 1.5TB HDD to put into the optical bay. I have a couple of questions.
    1. What format should I use for the HDD to allow both my OSX and Windows 7 sides read and write to it? I have a Bootcamp partition, but if it's possible I'd like for both OSX and W7 to be able to read and write to this drive. That way, when I'm in OSX I can view iTunes and media, but if I'm in W7 I can still have the same access. That way, I don't have to worry about "Oh, I downloaded this on the windows side ... I have to figure out how to get it over to the mac side" (or vice versa). Essentially allowing the 1.5TB HDD to be a "go between" for the two.
    2. This is a minor question, but will the eject button do something to the HDD if it gets pressed when the optical drive is out and the HDD/Data Doubler is in? I don't plan on pressing it, but I was wondering if I need to dig into terminal (or somewhere else) to "disable" the button or maybe just reassign it so that instead of ejecting it does some other function?
    I have heard of "MacDrives" for Windows, but I haven't used it. If this is a better option (to put the HDD into Mac OS Extended Journaled and use an application to allow W7 to read/write) that's fine.
    I am putting in the 1.5TB HDD. The end goal, if possible, is to allow the Windows 7 side to read/write to it. As long as it's not a "hacked together" method, I do not mind what way it's done.
    Any thoughts? I appreciate it!

    Use Winclone for the Windows partition and CCC for the OSX partition.

  • Share iTunes Library between OSX and Win7 Bootcamp

    I've done quite a bit of research on this but I still haven't found a solution that does what I require.
    Basically my setup is a SSD & HDD in my MBP. I have OSX and Win7 (Bootcamp) on the SSD and the NTFS HDD is a shared file storage drive for both Windows and OS. I have my iTunes library located on this drive and I want to be able to share the library between the OSs. I also want changes e.g. additions deletions made in windows to be reflected in OSX and vice versa.
    Technically this is possible and does in fact work if I point iTunes to the .itl file but the problem is that when I open iTunes after switching OSs it must go through a very lengthy library update which can take 30-60mins in some cases before I can use it. Obviously this is not a good solution so I'm wondering if there are any workarounds to accomplishing this?
    For example can I duplicate the .itl file and have one for win and one for OSX and still have the libraries stay in sync?

    Just for your info, Vista ***** whatever you try to do. I'm stuck with Vista on a pre-installed laptop. All experience I have from Vista is bad, don't buy Vista or a computer with preinstalled Vista if you can avoid it.
    We have three computers in a home network, one Macbook Pro, one PC with Windows XP, and the Vista laptop. All are using iTunes-8, downloaded and installed last week.
    Sharing iTunes libraries using the option to share libraries on a local network works fine between Mac and Windows-XP. The sharing also works fine between the XP and the Vista PC.
    But the Vista PC can't access the Mac iTunes library. When trying to open the Mac library, iTunes on the Vista computer says something like "Fetching library info from...". It's the same problem when trying to access the Vista library from the Mac.
    We had a similar problem when trying to access shared folders on the local network. Thanks to a tip on this forum how to tweak the Vista registry, the shared folder problem was solved.
    I'm think some registry setting in Vista might solve iTunes shared library problems. Maybe some Windows freak knows how to patch the registry to solve this issue.
    Otherwise the solution is to trash Vista, and install Windows-XP.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cannot save order due to credit block V1849

    In VA01, when I try to craete a sales order with Production order/ plan order , I get an information message saying that 'Subsequent function not possible due to credit block.' It is going into the incomplete logs and requires to provide details for

  • I have a problem connecting to my company exchange 2007 server from my IPAD2 the same settings worked with the IPAD1

    Hi All Can anybody help with this problem when trying to authenticate on the Microsoft Exchange Sever. I have been trying to connect the mail client on the IPAD2 to my company email (Exchange 2007 server) There appears to be an issue with the SSL set

  • SOAP receiver problem to configurate a soaplite WS

    Hello, I have the problem to connect a web service of an partner which is wrote in perl and uses the soap:lite implementation. Here is the code the partner have send to me: Simple Web Interface = http://rico1.orionwt.co.uk/cgi/whXMLLoad.pl XML Interf

  • Finding Item and brand distribution base on customer master

    Please help me to write query on my SQL 2008 database to how in one row the following data 1- Brand, item, Route(Salesman),Division (City), Total Available customer (Per Route),Total Available customer (Per Division), Total Customer purchased the Ite

  • Advice needed regarding best practice

    Hi - curious as to if what i have setup now should be changed to best utilize Time Machine. I have iMac with 750GB drive (a small chunk is partitioned for Vista) - lets assume I have 600 GB dedicated for the mac. I havetwo firewire external drives -