Partner ID matching for X12 EDI docs

I am trying to resolve an issue creating a XML EDI doc for BPEL. I have these 2 entries
getLookUpError Key = key = [InterchangeReceiverQual] value = [ZZ] param = [null] Value = null
2007.02.05 at 20:21:37:043: Thread-16: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit getLookUpError Key = key = [InterchangeReceiverID] value = [ABCCOMP] param = [null] Value = null
My interpetation is the ID's need to be set @ the Trading Partner level (instead of the null defaults). I have tried chanign them (without a new deploy) with no luck.
When changing any of the parms @ the partner level do I need to create a new agreement and deploy ?

Hello,
I have analyzed the log and also Document Protocol Parameter. Following are the issues.
1. Data seems to be invalid. It is apparent from the error as missing trailer.
2. Issue in setting the Document Protocol parameter. Following are the example
Interchange Receiver ID Qualifier : Make it zz
Interchange Receiver ID : EATONSTEEL
Application Sender's Code
Application Receiver's Code
You might have to set EATONSTEEL for all the above parameters.
It may be a good idea to import the EDI tutorial comes with the product and analyze the data against the Document Protocol parameters. Please also refer the B2B User guide/document i sent it for modelling.
Please let me know.
Rgds,Ramesh

Similar Messages

Adapter Modules & split 997 channel reqd for splitting Edi and Acknowledgement

Hi,
I am using PI 7.11 with B2B add-on installed.We will be using AS2 adapters ,as of now
configured file adapters in place of it.
This B2B scenario does not consists of Party because 1 sender and 1 receiver system is involved as of now.
May be client provides identifiers details and include party.
In my previous B2B scenario(PI 7.3) involving Seeburger , AS2 channel was configured with(image shown below)
SeeClassifier,BIC, message splitter modules and Split997 channel for splitting EDI PO and Functional Acknowledgement.
What are the adapter modules that will be required in case of B2B add on (PI 7.11)and does it requires
EDI separator channel for splitting EDI doc & Func Ack.What can be the other probable issues.
How we will monitor the messages and Ack once its implemented end to end?
Regards,
Mayank Yadav

Hey Mayank,
Inbound Scenario configuration: (3 step)
1) Sender AS2 (EDI messages) -----> EDI separator receiver (no mapping required here; EDI separator is used to split bulk EDI messages and configure acknowledgements (997) if required)
2) EDI separator sender (with message type(eg.850),version and sender ID/receiver ID configuration; here X12convertor module is used to change raw edi into XML) ----> Idoc or any receiver channel (inbound)(here you have your actual mapping)
(if 997 is configured as requested in the first step; then you need to handle the 997 generated by EDI separator)
3) EDI separator sender (997 message type,version,reverse combination of sender ID,receiver ID) to Receiver AS2 ( no modules required pass through)
Outbound Scenario configuration
1) sender channel (say Idoc) to AS2 receiver (requires mapping)
997 file can be sent back by partners (EDI 997 as acknowledgement)
this will be taken care like any other inbound message) which can be then converted to SYSTAT IDOC or so to track the status of outbound message.
B2B status tab in PI monitoring helps you track acknowledgements
Hope this answers your question:
What are the adapter modules that will be required in case of B2B add on (PI 7.11)and does it require
EDI separator channel for splitting EDI doc & Func Ack.What can be the other probable issues.
How we will monitor the messages and Ack once its implemented end to end?
For detailed information on this; please refer Functional Acknowledgement (Inbound and Outbound FA 997)- for Beginners
Regards,
Pooja

Configurations necessary for using EDI.

Dear All,
Kindly Give some light on configurations necessary for using EDI. I mean What is the use of EDI, How to use, what are the steps involve in that...
Regards
San Rao.

Dear San,
EDI (Electronic Data Interchange) The transmitting of documents from one computer application to another computer application using a standardized format.
Why implement EDI?
Improves data accuracy: You can eliminate the need to re-enter data from paper documents and thus prevent potential data entry errors. It is estimated to be one-tenth the cost of handling its paper equivalent.
Reduces technical complexity: With EDI, companies use standardized data formats to exchange documents. EDI allows companies using different systems to achieve computer-to-computer electronic exchange of business documents.
Lowers personnel needs: EDI can help companies reduce the need for personnel involved in paper business transaction processing.
Accelerates information exchange: The lead time between start and completion of order processing is greatly reduced. By timeous scheduling companies can plan production more accurately and thus reduce stock inventories.
EDI technologies have evolved as a data carrier replacing the paper document. It is not a new concept or a new practice. EDI has existed for more than 2 decades in Europe and North America.
Early electronic interchanges used proprietary formats agreed upon between two trading partners requiring new programs each time a new partner was added to the existing system. Lateron some industry groups began a cooperative effort to develop industry EDI standards for purchasing, transportation, and financial applications. Many of these standards supported only intra-industry trading, which led to a large number of EDI formats.
In 1979, the Accredited Standards Committee (ASC) X12 was formed to develop a generic EDI standard. In 1993, Version 3, Release 4 contained 192 standards. There are over 100 additional standards in development. In the U.S., the most commonly used standard is ANSI X12, coordinated by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). While in Europe, it is the Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce, and Transportation (EDIFACT) standard. SAP maps it message types by EDIFACT naming conventions
Hope this helps you.
Do award points if you found them useful.
Regards,
Rakesh

"Partner Determination Steps for Customer Master" clarification

Hi,
Let me clear myself at the outset itself, that I searched SDN for my below mentioned query, however I could not find any answer to my satisfaction....here I am posting again
In "Partner Determination for Customer Master", the following steps are undertaken -
Step 1:
1.a.) Create New Partner Determination Procedure
1.b.) For each Partner Determination Procedure, different Partner Functions, which are applicable for that specific determination procedure, are assigned. (along with other properties like if the PF is mandatory, not modifiable )
Step2:
"Partner Determination Procedure Assignment", here we assign different Partner Determination Procedure to different Account Groups. In other words, indirectly, we assign the partner functions to account groups. Right? (Please correct me if I am wrong)
Step3:
"Partner Function". Here we define new partner functions, (which are used in Step 1...)
Step4:
"Account Group- Function Assignment" - Here we assign the Partner Functions to Account Groups
Now My Question
(A) Since the Partner Functions are assigned (via partner determination procedure) to account groups in Step 1, then why Partner Functions are assigned AGAIN to account groups in Step 4. What is the significance of this assignment in Step 4.
(B) Is there is particular sequence of Steps (1 to 5), one should follow when somebody has to create new customer account group and/or new partner function.
Thanking you all in advance.

Dear SR
Leave SAP Partner Determination screen for 2 minutes and first understand the logic
1. Create the new partner functions
2. Create the new determination procedure
3. Link the new partner functions to the new determination procedure and add mandatory, non modifiable ,optional creteria
4. Assign the new determination procedure to the document type or account group at appropriate level
This is essence and this is for all 8 levels like CMR,sales doc header,item etc
Now coming to your qn
When you define a new account group ( you might be aware account group controls partner functions of CMR) you will say that your new account group will carry out patner functions like SP,SH,BP,PY
That is ACCOUNT GROUPS function assignment
Whenever you create a new account group you will do field selection in OBD2 like suppress optional.reqd etc,create no ranges and assign no ranges and also mainly this activity partner determination
These are must settings for a new account group
AG is the german key for sold to party Partner determination procedure
This is step 1
Then in next step you will tell AG will carry out such and such partner functions Step 2 like mandatory not modifiable etc
Step 3 is link the AG to your account group
Step 4 is partner functions say if you want to create a new partner function say SB special stock partner
(in concept this is the firststep)
Step 5 is once again partner function account group assignment
So when you create a new partner function you will do step 4 first and step 5 and then 1 and 2 and 3
when you create a new account group you will do step 5 and then 1 and 2 and 3
Hope you understand now
Partner functions are relatives in your family
Say in a family we have Father ,mother sister, brother (these 4 partner functions)
This is called as Happy Family and this Happy Family is the Partner determination procedure in SAP
This Happy Family is linked to the account group
So Happy family means there are 4 partner functions
So whenever you create a CMR in the account group this father.mother,brother,sister will come as default
Suppose you add another partner function say Uncle
First you have to create uncle
Then you have to tell this account group will accept uncle
Then link the uncle in the happy family that is determination procedure of SAP along with the 4
Then assign happy family to the account group
Now when you create a CMR along with father.mother,brother,sister along with that uncle will also come
Regards
Raja

Invalid trading partner account combination for item 001

Hi,
All, i am trying to post an entry in T.code F-02.
i am getting below error.
Please advice.
Invalid trading partner account combination for item 001 com 2409 GL 601435 Assig
Message no. Z1012

Please check the validation in GGB0.
The document which you are trying to post is not matching as per the validation.

Multiple System identifiers for one EDI Party

Hi,
I'm getting a problem when trying to send an IDoc to another R/3 system. I did the first tests with our SandBox and everything was working perfectly. Now, I'm trying to do the same tests against our QAT server.
So first, I have created all the new entries under the party identifiers. Then, new Business Service, receiver determination ... and finally the sender agreement.
So, now the file is getting picked up but I get this error:
<SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_INV_SND_PARTY</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>http://sap.com/xi/XI</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>XIParty</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>Tech_Data</SAP:P3>
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Unable to convert sender XI party http://sap.com/xi/XI/XIParty/Tech_Data to an IDoc partner</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Seems the new identifiers for QAT is not piked up?!? Do I need to do something else if I have multiple identifiers?
Rgds,
Yves

Hi Yves,
In the "Indentifier" section of your party definition for the EDI Party
Change the following:
AGENCY = Change the Business System from SBX to QAT
Scheme = Remains the same
Name   = Change the SBX Partner Number to QAT
         Partner Number(same as QAT Partner Number
         in R/3 Partner Profile)
Idoc Receiver CC for QAT
1) In the "parameters" tab, check the option "Apply Control Record Values from Payload"
2) In the "Identifiers" tab,
   Enter the BS for QAT in "Sender Agency"
   Enter the Scheme for QAT "ALE#<partner role>#<partner function>"(same as in
   the identifiers tab of the EDI party definition)
   Enter the BS for QAT in "Receiver Agency"
   Enter the Schem for QAt as "ALE#LS"
It should work with these changes.
Rgds,
Sam Raju

How to find Ship to party number for a Sale doc.

Hi,
Currently, I have a sale doc number with type ZDR (Debit memo request). Could you please let me know how can I get the ship to party number for that document number.
In General, Could you please show me how to get ship-to party number for a sale doc with all sale doc type ?
Thanks,

Hi Krishna,
Your answer is correct, I just go to table VBPA pass the sale doc number & choose the partner function as ship to party, then I can get the ship-to-party ID.
Hi Sandipsinh,
The KUWEV is the customer master data view that is used in standard T-code. However It is not a table, therefore I can't get data from it.
Hi senya_1111,
You know, with a sale order we have only one sold-to-party. However, we can have several corresponding ship-to-partys.
Moreover, In table VBAK(Sale order header) we just have sold-to-party not ship-to-party. That means we can get wrong value in case ship-to-party is not the same as sold-to-party.
Overall, Thank all of you for your opinion.

Standard Idocs for the EDI's

Hi,
Where can i find the IDOCs' for the EDI's
812, 816, 822, 846, 860, 867, 870 and EDIFACT INVRPT
Is there any specific tcode to find the IDOC's for the particular EDI's ?

Hi,
Please check my previous reply in this thread.
Re: IDOC Types and their equivalent messages in EDIFACT and ANSI X12
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Report that shows the PO and PR number for each FI doc # of invoice posting

Hi
I want a report in SAP for PO and PR no. for each FI doc.
Thanks & Regards

There is no standard report. Through development or BI.

ITunes match for a large number of devices, 4 people, and as a backup solution.

I am interested in using iTunes match for two central reasons:
1. Backing up my music library. Is iTunes Match an solution for this? Or not really? I get the fact that my purchases are protected, but what about the music I uploaded from purchased CD's.
Question: Can I consider iTunes Match at $24.99/year the cost of backing up 60GB of music to the cloud?
2. Sharing my music library across a number of devices. We are a family of 4 with farily extensive MAC, iPhone, iPad usage, including ...
1 iMac (Music server), 3 Power books (Indivudal work machines), 2 iPads, Apple TV, and 4 iPhones. We have 4 Mobile me accounts, moving to ICloud.
The problem I have is that I can never effectively coordinate the music library across the devices. 80GB of iTunes library is too much to load across all the devices and I never seem to have the song I'm looking for at the time I desire it on a particular device, other then the family iMAC server which has the whole library on it.
Question: Seems like iTunes Match is an ideal solution, but can it handle the diverse spectrum and number of devices I have? Ideally I want to thnk of iTunes Matchas, 1 central library avaialble on all devices, all the time.
Thank you in advance for any opinions.
MikeK

mek wrote:
Question: Seems like iTunes Match is an ideal solution, but can it handle the diverse spectrum and number of devices I have? Ideally I want to thnk of iTunes Matchas, 1 central library avaialble on all devices, all the time.
Think of iTunes Match as a central library from which "satellite" libraries can pull any time they have an Internet connection.
Functionally, if all those devices are in your house, iTunes Match doesn't give you much that Home Sharing doesn't already offer. With Home Sharing all your Macs can easily "fill in the gaps" from the "master" library. Of course, that requires that the machine with the "master" library is always online and iTunes is always running on it, which might not be the case. AppleTVs and iPads sync to that "master" library and so what is on them is configured from the master library computer, not the device itself.
What iTunes Match offers you is:
1. Your "canonical" library lives "in the cloud" and so you don't have to have a home server up and running iTunes at all times.
2. Your "canonical" library lives "in the cloud" and so you can update from it any time you have an internet connection, not just when you are at home.
3. The workflow for updating from the canonical library is much better than the clunky "Home Sharing" interface.
4. Any "matched" songs (I found that in my library only about 65% were successfully matched; I'm not sure why) will be available at 256kbps AAC, which might be higher quality than what you have in your library currently (especially if you have imperfections like CD skipping, etc, in the tracks). Of course, anything iTunes can't match to its own library will remain just as imperfect as ever.
The downside (versus Home Sharing) is:
1. Everything needs to get copied onto a device from the Internet, which is likely to take much longer than just Home Sharing over your home wireless network.
Seems like a pretty good system. I've signed up for it and am happy with what I've seen so far.

HT204074 I have our music collection on iTunes Match for my PC, ipad and iphone. Can I share that music collection with my wife so she can play that with her iphone? Even though she has a different Apple ID from me?

I have our music collection on iTunes Match for my PC, ipad and iphone.
Can I share that music collection with my wife so she can play that with her iphone? Even though she has a different Apple ID from me?

Her iPhone will need to be set up to iTunes Match using your Apple ID to be able to share music via iTunes Match. Otherwise you'll have to download the music to your computer and then copy those tracks into her iTunes library, assuming hers is separate.
Regards.

Canceling a billing doc for which accounting doc not yet generated

Hello,
I have strange issue in canceling billing doc. What happened user created Intercompany billing doc IV against a delivery and accounting doc also released to FI. After that he found that value in that IV doc is not correct so he went and cancelled that doc IV and he created internal credit memo IG .But for this IG the accounting doc not generated due to FI period closing. Because the IV is created in the month of Oct and IG is created in the month of Nov'07.Due to this issue Accounting document not generated for this IG doc.
But unfortunately by mistake he went cancelled the IG doc and it created IV again. Now what happened both IG and new IV created are showing in cancelled status. This is because if we cancel a billing doc for which accounting doc not created, then both doc will turning into cancelled status in doc flow. This is confirmed similar situation in my quality box and confirmed.
Now can anybody come across this kind of issue and tell me what is the best approach to handle this kind of situation.
Thanks
Mathi

Hi Nina
As you are doing Delivery and then billing with the service item category ZTAD , so go to VOV7 and check wheather the Billing Relevance ( Delivery related billing ) has been maintained or not .
Also check wheather in VTLA & VTFL copy controls , ZTAD item category has been maintained or not
Regards
Srinath

Error -: AIP-16012: Parameter: trading Partner is unique for object Trading

Hi Gurus,
When I go to rename the b2b server under trading partners, I receive the following error:
An error occurred when updating the trading partner.
1. Error -: AIP-16012: Parameter: trading Partner is unique for object Trading Partner Identification
2. TradingPartner.TradingPartner - Error -: AIP-11052: Writing following objects: Trading Partner Identification failed due to following constraint violation: TRADINGPARTNERIDENTIFICATION_UK. UNIQUE CONSTRAINT VIOLATION
3. PartyIdentificationType.TradingPartnerIdentificationType - Error -: AIP-11052: Writing following objects: Trading Partner Identification failed due to following constraint violation: TRADINGPARTNERIDENTIFICATION_UK. UNIQUE CONSTRAINT VIOLATION
4. Value - Error -: AIP-11052: Writing following objects: Trading Partner Identification failed due to following constraint violation: TRADINGPARTNERIDENTIFICATION_UK. UNIQUE CONSTRAINT VIOL
This occurs after I purge the b2b and even manually delete the trading partner that has the name that I require to change the server to (required for quality assurance testing). When I check the identifiers, there are two name ones (one of them is the one I am trying to change to) but I cannot delete any of them as it is grayed out.
Any thoughts?
Thanks
Gerald
Edited by: Gerald M. on Nov 30, 2009 8:50 AM -addtional info

Solved the issue, I manually delete entries in b2b.tip_tradingpartneriden_aud and b2b.tip_tradingpartneridentifica_t.
Is this safe to be doing this?
Thanks
Gerald

SCCM 2012 SP1 - OS Deployment - hash could not be matched for the downloded content

I've got a newly deployed SCCM 2012 SP1 running on Windows Server 2012. The W2K12 runs as vm on ESX 5.1. I'm having very odd issues with OS deployment. The TS keeps failing when processing SCCM client installation - it downloads the package but then it fails
straight away with the 80091007 - hash values couldn't be matched error - some extract from smsts.log attached below. It's very consistent, it happens every time - it downloads and applies the image fine straight after that it bombs out.
What is very interesting is that it works perfectly fine when I deploy vms (on the same or different host) - the issue seems to be be only affecting physical machines (laptops desktops). This might suggest some network issues (vSwitch with Cisco switches) but
the config on the switch is very simple and this shouldn't be the case.
I had a few virtualised SCCM 2007 installations (ESX 5 and 4) and it always worked with no problems.
I tried to recreate the package (changing source directory), turn binary differential replication on and off, copy the content of the package to the dist point or not copy. Push client installation (or other package deployments) work fine
When I tried to deploy with no download - sometimes it works but most of the time I'd get the files/folder corrupt error (can't remember the No)
This is starting to drive me crazy - There are some significant changes in the way SCCM 2012 is validating package integrity (like Content Lib folder) but the consistency of this problem is just very odd.
Anyone has any clues?
thanks
- Downloaded file from http://GTKVMGMT05.GTK.LOC...m?/x64/wic_x64_enu.exe to C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\GTK0000C\x64/wic_x64_enu.exe
- Download done setting progress bar to 100
VerifyContentHash: Hash algorithm is 32780
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\GTK0000c\i386 is a directory. Setting directory security
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\GTK0000c\x64 is a directory. Setting directory security
- Hash could not be matched for the downloded content. Original ContentHash = 5EF3A189C48F3469440A83026EC8ECD36EAD6EAF3B5D35663F8201BDE175413C, Downloaded ContentHash = FA4516EDD2D7907F8FA472A3E1B717DF2DD4A0976CD4CEAE11045EE62EC8C661
0L == TS::Utility::VerifyPackageHash(pszContentID, sDestination), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,2999)
- DownloadContentAndVerifyHash(pszPackageID, L"SMSPackage", saHttpContentSources, saSMBContentSources, saMulticastContentSources, sDestination, dwFlags, L"", 0, dwPackageFlags, pszUserName, pszUserPassword ), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,3106)
- DownloadContentLocally(pszSource, sSourceDirectory, dwFlags, hUserToken, pszUserName, pszUserPassword), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,3331)
ResolveSource(pszSource, sSourceDirectory, dwFlags, 0, 0, 0), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,3221)
TS::Utility::ResolveSource(sClientPackageID, sClientPackagePath), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\client\osdeployment\osdgina\basesetuphook.cpp,1655)
- Failed to resolve package source "GTK0000C"
- Exiting ConfigureEx: 0x80091007
- BaseSetupHook::configure(sWindowsDir), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\client\osdeployment\osdgina\osdsetuphook.cpp,292)
- Failed to configure OSD setup hook (0x80091007)
- Failed to configure OSD setup hook (0x80091007)

is this the only indication of a problem in your smsts.log file ? did you apply the
authenticode hotfix or have you
downloaded the SP1 media after that hotfix was applied ?
Step by Step Configuration Manager Guides >
2012 Guides |
2007 Guides | I'm on Twitter > ncbrady

Hash could not be matched for the downloded content. Original ContentHash = , Downloaded ContentHash

<![LOG[Download done setting progress bar to 100]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="1" thread="2544"
file="downloadcontent.cpp:1603">
<![LOG[VerifyContentHash: Hash algorithm is 32780]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="1" thread="2544"
file="downloadcontent.cpp:1726">
<![LOG[Failed to open file c:\_smstasksequence\packages\cms00007\configmgr2012adminui-rtm-kb2717295-i386.msp with error [32].
]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="3" thread="2544" file="securityutil.cpp:478">
<![LOG[HashFile - exclusive access check for the file failed.]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context=""
type="3" thread="2544" file="hashdir.cpp:227">
<![LOG[Failed to hash file, Win32 error = 4103]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="3"
thread="2544" file="hashdir.cpp:631">
<![LOG[Hash could not be matched for the downloded content. Original ContentHash = 0617F93A16E48E5E4AE958081967812D78AF06F608A1C39CD9DE85D97003AD01, Downloaded ContentHash = ]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120"
date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="3" thread="2544" file="downloadcontent.cpp:1771">
<![LOG[0L == TS::Utility::VerifyPackageHash(pszContentID, sDestination), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,2900)]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013"
component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="0" thread="2544" file="resolvesource.cpp:2900">
<![LOG[DownloadContentAndVerifyHash(pszPackageID, L"SMSPackage", saHttpContentSources, saSMBContentSources, saMulticastContentSources, sDestination, dwFlags, L"", 0, dwPackageFlags, pszUserName, pszUserPassword
), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,3007)]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="0" thread="2544"
file="resolvesource.cpp:3007">
i saw this links :
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/909ea31c-7bda-49e2-8b06-ed4fc9c3c48c/
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/4801408b-de60-488c-9d80-7a87134abbaf/
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/4942384c-161c-454f-b8da-bc2a24844602
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/a57bb130-f231-4ced-8ec9-2f645ef9e5f1
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/7146fa83-d00e-4fc1-924b-a829860e506a
i did not try to do this Antivirus Scan and Exclusion Recommendations (i relay don't see why i need this if all oder task finshing succesfuly
http://blogs.technet.com/b/configurationmgr/archive/2010/11/30/configmgr-2007-antivirus-scan-and-exclusion-recommendations.aspx
i redownload the file from the -kb2717295 and recreate the package , i run this image deployment on all kind of PC they all failed, here is the
file : configmgr2012adminui-rtm-kb2717295-i386.msp
i don't know why this file failed, i run this manual it work and this task is also a deployment on collection and it have 100% successes on 8 pc
i wander what make it failed .

This is what worked for me. I had to create a brand new package and push it out to the DP's. Then updated my Task Sequence with the new package. It worked perfectly for me. I hope this helps.

Partner ID matching for X12 EDI docs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for