Payment Block after MIRO posting

Dear Sirs,
We had posted MIRO entry, but now due to some reason we don't want to pay to vendor against that invoice.
We want to block that invoice for payment.
How could this function can be performed.

Hi Gupta,
Please check SPRO->Fin Acctg->AR&AP->Business Transactions->Outgoing Payments->Outgoing Payments Global->Payment Block Reasons->define Payment Block
We then ticked "not changeable" for the LIV block reason (R in our case). You may have to scroll to the right to see the field.
This meant that when the user went to the FB02 etc the block reason was locked if it was R so it couldn't be changed online, it had to be done via MRBR. Of course, we then had the situation of findingqualified staff to have access to MRBR to investigate the items before releasing them.
Regards
Sridhar

Similar Messages

MIRO still Payment Block after Release

Dear Experts,
I got a trouble with invoice process. We are using workflow to release payment block, so that the status of the MIRO can be changed from "P Payment Request" to "Free for Payment". The problem is the status cannot be changed to "Free for Payment" even after release via workflow has been carried out. When we checked the workflow status, the workflow runs well, and the release successfully done via that workflow. Another problem is : this case happens only on several MIROs randomly. Sometimes this case happens, while in another MIRO this case never happens.
Can you help me with the problem? Is there any reason why this kind of issue happens?
Thank you very much

hi,
check the below mwntioned link.
Payment Block after MIRO posting
regards
sumit simran

User Exit or BADI for payment block in MIRO

Hi all,
I need a User Exit or BADI for payment block in MIRO for line item. please help.
Thanks
babu

Hi,
Check the components in enhancement "LMR1M001".
Regards
Vinod

Payment blocking for MIRO invoice.

Hi,
    We Need to build Payment release workflow for MIRO invoice.
    If the invoice amount exceeds 10000, that line item need to be blocked and shoudl be sent a mail for approval.
    My doubt is, whether the payment blocking is done by configuration settings or will workflow take care of that one?
    Requirement is, line item should be blocked automatically while posting the doc in MIRO.
    If it can be done by configuration, could anybody suggest the path to do so.
    Thanks,
    Shyam.

I would try another SDN forum.

BADI for marking Payment Block during MIRO

Dear Sir,
We are required to implement a BADI , so that during MIRO at the header level the Payment Block (ZLSPR)is marked as "B" .
May I request SAP experts , to kindly help me with a sample code for the same please .
Regards
B Mittal

Hi,
It does not work... in the badi IF_EX_INVOICE_UPDATE~CHANGE_AT_SAVE we can implement :
METHOD if_ex_invoice_update~change_at_save.
DATA: l_rseg(30) TYPE c VALUE '(SAPLMR1M)ydrseg[]',
 l_miro(4) TYPE c VALUE 'MIRO',
 lt_rbco TYPE TABLE OF mrmrbco,
 ls_rbco TYPE mrmrbco.
TYPE-POOLS: mmcr.
FIELD-SYMBOLS : <fs_rseg> TYPE mmcr_tdrseg .
FIELD-SYMBOLS : <fs_rseg2> TYPE mmcr_drseg.
Controle pour transaction Miro
IF sy-tcode EQ l_miro.
Cas1 Facture sur poste de la commande + CIA
 ASSIGN (l_rseg) TO <fs_rseg>.
 SORT <fs_rseg> BY ebeln.
 LOOP AT <fs_rseg> ASSIGNING <fs_rseg2> WHERE ebeln NE space.
 IF NOT ti_rbco_new[] IS INITIAL.
 lt_rbco[] = ti_rbco_new[].
 SORT lt_rbco BY cobl_nr.
 READ TABLE lt_rbco INTO ls_rbco
 WITH KEY cobl_nr = '0001'
 BINARY SEARCH.
 IF sy-subrc = 0.
 IF NOT ti_rseg_new[] IS INITIAL.
 Ajout du blocage manuel
 <fs_rseg2>-spgrq = 'X'.
 EXIT.
 ELSE.
 Facture sans poste de la commande
 MESSAGE e324(/sapsll/pluginr3).
 ENDIF.
 ENDIF.
 ENDIF.
 ENDLOOP.
ENDIF
ENDMETHOD.

TP Document getting Payment Blocked after F110 Print

Hi All,
We're encountering an issue in F110 Payment Run:
After F110 Payment Run, F110 Document Number has a Payment Block "A" when verified in FB03
Normally this is not the case. Has anybody encountered this issue?

Hi,
After checking the tcode, the payment term has no tick-mark for blocking payments.
Any other possible causes for this? I've checked the vendor master data?

How to Make MRBR to show the Customised Payment Block Indicator (MIRO) ?

Hi
Currently, from what I know of, MRBR only showing Log Payment Block as follows:
A     Automatically blocked due to existence of blocking reasons
S     Stochastically blocked
M     Manual payment block set in header - no blocking reasons
W     Automatically blocked due to entry via Web Invoice
However during the manual MIRO creation, I put in customised Payment Block G (Block due to XX) in the Payment Tab of MIRO. This G does not get shown up in MRBR.
How to make it possible in MRBR as I have configured a few customised Payment Block such as G (Block due to XX) and H (Block due to YY).
I would like MRBR to show up the exact Payment Block indicators as those in the MIRO.
Please help.
Thanks

Hi Nick.
I just found out that Payment Block Indicator shown in MIRO will appear in MRBR. The reason that it was not shown in MRBR because during MIRO creation, it was set BLANK and then user went to FB02 to change it with other customised Payment Block Value, thus when we run MRBR, it was showing blank under Payment Block column. Thus, we had to resort to LOG Payment Block which gave rise to this thread.
Having understand the importance of how FB02 changing payment block will affect MRBR, we have decided not to let user change the payment block in FB02.
SAP note: 394370 has explained everything:
"A document generated with MIRO was blocked for payment. You cancel the payment block from the vendor line item in the FI follow-up document. Transaction MRBR then displays the invoice document nevertheless. Why?
The invoice document itself cannot be changed by changes to the follow-up documents; this is not programmed. Transaction MRBR therefore continues to display the document as blocked. If this document is released from an MM point of view, the FI follow-up document remains released. Thus the damage caused is restricted to unnecessary work by the user. SAP recommends that you only use the release transactions for releasing invoices."
Thanks a lot!

BAPI/FM to remove payment block on MIRO Invoice

I need a BAPI/FM to remove a payment block on a MIRO invoice. I realize that this has probably been answered before but, due to SDN's search feature, I haven't been able to find an answer.
Regards,
Davis

Yes you are right. all methods are for price block only . sorry about that.
How about BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CHANGE and it have import header table BAPI_INCINV_CHNG_HEADER-PMNT_BLOCK
a®

Report logic to get net payment made after creditmemo posting

i have to create a report for vendor payments made against a project i.e wbs.I am able to get the details of invoice from BSEG and payment clearing from BSAK.If i have posted credit memos to these vendors how could i get them included in the report to ensure i could derive at the net payment made to vendor including the credit memo posted.How do i get the net payment after considering the creditmemo posted.

Hi, you can use the posting key logic, normally the posting keys used for invoice, credit memo and clearing document will be different. You can take help from debit or credit indicator also.

Screen not clearing once after MIRO POSTING

Hi Expert
We done Enhancement in Miro, This enhancement working but once posted the document, screen will clear but in this process after posting the doc everthing as it is, screen is not clear.
Please give me a solution
Thanks
Mani.S
Edited by: smanimba1 on Oct 11, 2011 10:57 AM

Hi ,
Check whether Posting is done properly or Not . There might be some error left to be cleared in your Enhancement .
regards
Deepak.

Payment block in MIRO

When I do MIRO its gettting blocked for further payment Even there is no price ,quantity & rate difference

Hi Dhananjay,
It looks like there is QM Control key which is affecting MIRO. Check in the material master QM View for the control key assigned.
Control Key defined with Block Invoice
Use
If you set this indicator, the payment of the invoice is blocked with blocking reason I (I = Inspection), if you want to prevent automatic payment of the invoice from a QM standpoint.
If this indicator is set, when the invoice is created, the system determines whether an inspection lot exists and if necessary, sets blocking reason I. This occurs in the following instances:
There is still no usage decision for the inspection lot
The inspection lot is rejected
The automatic payment program checks whether the blocking reason I still exists.
The following scenarios can occur:
Invoice verification takes place with reference to the goods receipt.
If there are several partial deliveries for an order item, the system checks for each GR item whether blocking reason I exists. This means that automatic payment of the invoice is only prevented for partial deliveries that do not fulfill requirements.
Invoice verification takes place without reference to the goods receipt.
If there are several partial deliveries for an order item, the system only checks with reference to the order item whether blocking reason I exists. This means that automatic payment of the invoice is prevented, if one or more GR items does not fulfill requirements.
The system does not automatically remove blocking reason I, if an acceptance decision is made for the inspection lot concerned. You must remove blocking reason I at invoice verification or invoice release. To do this, set the indicator Release invoices automatically when releasing invoices.
If you only want to pay invoices, when the quality management process has accepted goods or waived a goods receipt inspection, you must ensure that invoices are not entered before goods receipt. You do this by planning GR-based invoice verification for the relevant vendors.
Vendor Blocked
The other possibility is that a vendor can be blocked through QM Info record (QI02) based on quanity or time.
Please look into the above 2 aspects, it would help you in resolving the problem,. Reward your points,
Regards,
Prasobh

MIRO - Require Lower Tolerance Level to enforce Payment Block

Hi,
I have a requirement to enforce a payment block in MIRO when the tolerence level is below the threshhold set-up in config.
My original intention was to use Userexit MM08R002 to check the tolerance level, however EXIT_SAPLKONT_002 does not seem to be triggering. It is active and I have placed a hard coded break point.
Does anyone know how to trigger this exit in MIRO?
Many Thanks,
Phil

I managed to formalize a solution by implementing Enhancement Spots in FM: MRM_AMOUNT_CHECK & MRM_FINAL_CHECK.
I exported the message table in MRM_AMOUNT_CHECK to memory. I then imported and processed this table in MRM_FINAL_CHECK, triggered when the document is posted. If the message table contained relevant messages i.e.084 then I enforced a manual payment block.
Hope this helps others with a similar problem.
Regards,
Phil

Automatic payment block configuration

Hi,
How and where can I deactivate automatic payment block(in MIRO) fo particular doc. type ?
I do not want to deactivate amount check for whole company code.
Thanks and Regards
Rafal
Edited by: Rafal Pojda on May 4, 2009 11:35 AM

HI,
In SPRO-MM-LIV-invoice Block-->Activate Amount Check
Deactivate the same
In SPRO-MM-LIV-invoice Block-->Stochastic Block
Deactivate the same
and in the Vendor Master Setting in the Payemnt Transaction,--Make the Payment methos --Free for payment.
After that the amount Tolerance limit--Make it as dont check
it is done in the T code OMR6, as per the company code
against the keys mentioned below
u2022     AN: Amount for item without order reference
u2022     AP: Amount for item with order reference
u2022     BD: Form small differences automatically
u2022     BR: Percentage OPUn variance (IR before GR)
u2022     BW: Percentage OPUn variance (GR before IR)
u2022     DQ: Exceed amount: quantity variance
u2022     DW: Quantity variance when GR quantity = zero
u2022     KW: Variance from condition value
u2022     LA: Amount of blanket purchase order
u2022     LD: Blanket purchase order time limit exceeded
u2022     PP: Price variance
u2022     PS: Price variance: estimated price
u2022     ST: Date variance (value x days)
u2022     VP: Moving average price variance
Hope so it helps
Regards
Anjanna

Payment Block Not stopping the payment to vendor??

Hi All,
we have a problem related to Payment Block option in Vendor Invoice.
by using FB02 We have updated the payment block for MIRO accounting document against the vendor line item.
while processing the vendor payment the blocked invoice is appearing for payment and it is allowing to make payment against this invoice.
is there any setting to activate the payment block or any configuration is to be done to do so.
please guide us.
thanks & regards,
shashi kanth

Hi,
Generally we use Payment block for Automatic payments with Tcode F110.
If you would like to use payment block for normal payment, Create a new payment block or change existing payment block Tick Manual payment block option.
Path :- Out going pamyment --> OG payments global settings --> Define payment block reasons..
Regards,
Venky

Validation Rule on Payment block

Hi All,
Need your expert advice on below scenario
Specific users are allow to remove payment block of Document posted of specific vendors, can you please provide what logic I use in GGB0 Validation rule.
Logic used by me is under prerequisit:
Company Code = '1100' AND Vendor = 'vendor Number' AND User Name <> 'User ID'
under Check:
Pmnt Block <> 'B'
it is restricted user from editing payment block of posted document.

Hi Revan,
Your logic will work. It will have side effects - but if you take another approach, there will be others (perhaps more serious ones). So, I would suggest going ahead with it and see where it needs to be adjsuted.
Let's list some of the drawbacks, so that you can address them if needed:
* For example, no other user will be able to post or change anything on such a vendor item (not even Text, Assignment etc.) if the payment block is not set. I believe you have to live with it.
* No other user will be able to reverse (trans. FB08 etc.) or unclear (trans. FBRA) such items if they are not blocked against payment. Blocking FBRA is perhaps OK, but I would strongly recommend excluding trans. FB08 from the prerequisites - it is usually a good practice to allow "everything" on reversal, so that any error can be corrected this way.
* If the item is blocked with another indicator (e.g., "R" from logistics invoice verification) then the other users will not be able to do anything with it, either. Do you want the block type to be so specific? If not, then you may consider a blank block in the "check". But this is rather a detail.
Lakshmi also had a good idea to include all such users (and perhaps vendors) in sets (with trans. GS01 / GS02) to make it more flexible to change them as employees move or new vendors become critical. This could however open a "back door" if the access to this set (these sets) is not properly controlled.
I was also thinking about a different approach - to do it through authorization roles and profiles, but it would have much more drawbacks (e.g. with object Accounting Document: Account Authorization for Vendors (F_BKPF_BEK) - only the priviledged group would be able to perform specific actions on such vendor items, whether or not they would be blocked - which would be harsher than you design). So, you are trying the right approach, but it may just be needed to finetune it a little (put some more prerequisites, such as "exclude FB08"). You do it the right way, I believe.
Good luck!

Payment Block after MIRO posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for