Performance of FCStudio 3 on Mac Pro 8 core ?

I decided to upgrade to FCS 3 (already purchased) from FCE. Further, an upgrade from my old G4 to an 8 core MacPro 4,1 (ddr3, direct connect {no FSB), Nehalem, 6GB ram, but not yet purchased), since FCS3 requires an Intel Mac.
I just found out by searching here that FCS 3 is still 32 bit (eek!). I had incorrectly assumed that it was 64 bit but got suspicious when I couldn't find mention of it. So it seems that rethinking whether an 8 core with multi threading and virtual cores and more than 4 GB ram is beneficial, is in order, because one can spend $1K less on a 32 bit machine with less memory.
While many here feel that the next FCP version will be 64 bit, there is no word from Apple (naturally) of that or when it might be available.
I don't know much about Snow Leopard since I'll be jumping up from Tiger and I also don't know much about multi-threading other than it allows virtual cores to help with the processing power. What I do know is that 64 bit architecture requires 64 bit code to speed up the processor output other than the new "turbo boost" mechanism.
*My questions:* Does 32 bit FCS 3 have the ability to take advantage of multiple cores in a quad chip or is it going to use only 1 of the 4 cores and does that mean that clock speed is the dominant factor in processor throughput? Extending that further, will the second quad processor, in an 8 core, take any load off the first quad processor? All of which is asking: if you have 8 physical cores will the 32 bit FCS 3 be using only 1 of those 8? Does it use any virtual cores or is that just pie in the sky for FCS now?
Any light you can shine on this for me is appreciated.
Ken

Does 32 bit FCS 3 have the ability to take advantage of multiple cores in a quad chip or is it going to use only 1 of the 4 cores and does that mean that clock speed is the dominant factor in processor throughput?
The current version of FCP..and all the past versions...uses only ONE processor. The only app that uses all those cores is Compressor. But when it does, it is FAST. Shake does this too. So no matter how many processors you have, FCP only uses one processor. But when you go to compress something, and have QMaster set up to use all the processors...it flies!
if you have 8 physical cores will the 32 bit FCS 3 be using only 1 of those 8? Does it use any virtual cores or is that just pie in the sky for FCS now?
Pie in the sky...possible future versions.
Shane

Similar Messages

  • After effects performance issues on mac pro 12-core

    Hello everyone,
    I feel as if i keep making similar posts to this, but for some reason i am still not satisfied with my machine. Im using a mac pro 12-core 2.4GHz with 40gigs of ram installed and a ATI Radeon 5770 graphics card.
    I finally got around to getting my SSD set up and i have all of my applications installed on it along with the OS. i also have all of my cache files set to my WD hard drive so I'm not clogging up my 120GB SSD. My SSD has 40gigs left so i figure i shouldn't go any lower than that to keep the performance of the drive at its fullest potential.
    I do a lot of work in after effects CS6 and i feel that the machine is still going slow.. I was working on a project last night and when i went to do a RAM preview i kept getting the beach ball and after effects would glitch up.. what would be the main cause of this? could it have been that the destination file i was working with was on my WD drive and not the SSD?
    I don't know what it is i need to keep adding to this machine to finally be satisfied with its performance.. My next investment would most likely be a GTX 570 to enable CUDA cores for open GL rendering, but i still feel that i should still be getting great performance now.
    Any suggestions? maybe I'm doing something wrong?
    Thanks in advance!

    Rick is talking about After Effects Multiprocessing.  You can turn it off and on here:
    Also, you've only reserved 3 GB out of 40 GB for other applications.  Other apps on your computer also need memory to work and setting this number so low could cause these apps to fight with After Effects over the available memory causing AE to slow down. I would suggest starting with that number a lot higher, possibly around 10 GB.  Then do a bunch of render tests to see what the best settings are for your machine. 
    I also highly recommend watching the "Using 'Render Multiple Frames Simultaneously' Multiprocessing" tutorial by Adobe employee Todd Kopriva on Video2Brain for more information.  If you really want to learn more about getting the best performance in AE, I would go through the rest of the After Effects & Premiere Pro Performance Workshop.  You'll learn a lot.

  • Slow Performance On Mac Pro 12-Core

    Hello Everyone,
    I just recently purchased a 2012 Mac pro 12-Core and i have been getting unbelievabley slow performance with it. I am using Premiere Pro CS6 and it seems that the footage can sometimes get a bit laggy at times and not play back smoothly, sometimes rendering can take a bit of time as well. However here are the specs of my system:
    Mac Pro 12-Core 2.4GHz (2.67GHz Turbo Boost)
    40GB of Ram
    ATI 5770 Graphics Card
    1TB scratch disk (with a user on the drive that i can boot into)
    OCZ 120GB Vertex 3 SSD OS/APPS drive
    First question i would like to get answered once and for all.. Did i make a bad decision by purchasing a computer with such a slow clock speed (2.4GHz)?? I figured since The new editing software is switching to 64bit it shouldn't depend on clock speed anymore? (i just want to be sure that i purchased a more than capable machine) However i will be buying a Samsung 840 Pro Series 256GB SSD Drive for Scratch within the month. (I dont have the budget to buy a Raid controller yet to utilize 6GB/s transfer speeds, so 1 Fast SSD drive will have to do for now)
    I should mention the current SSD drive im on right now only has 13GB remaining, would that affect performance? Also, my 1Tb media drive is filled up with CRAP from my previous computer (Migration transferred EVERYTHING to that drive, only 120GB remains) would that drive with the media im working with affect performance too? Also just as a test, i took some footage from my GoPro Hero 3 camera and put it on my SSD to see if that would eliminate the lag, but still lag was present in Premiere.. (the footage was in a crappy .M4P format, so that may have affected it, but I dont know)
    Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!
    -Thanks in Advance!

    The new editing software is switching to 64bit it shouldn't depend on clock speed anymore?
    Wrong, clock speed is everything.
    I should mention the current SSD drive im on right now only has 13GB remaining, would that affect performance?
    No, not really.
    Also, my 1Tb media drive is filled up with CRAP from my previous computer (Migration transferred EVERYTHING to that drive, only 120GB remains) would that drive with the media im working with affect performance too?
    When fill rates go up, performance goes down. With almost 90% fill rate, the disk performs only at around 50% of a new disk.
    Two disks is absolute bare minimum, and your cores will constantly be waiting for the disks to read or write data, sitting idle most of the time.
    Also just as a test, i took some footage from my GoPro Hero 3 camera and put it on my SSD to see if that would eliminate the lag, but still lag was present in Premiere..
    GoPro material requires a very fast computer, which yours is not with the low clock speed, outdated E5620 CPU's, only two disks, and a non-CUDA capable video card.
    Take a look at the PPBM5 Benchmark and look at the system at rank # 854, which is a MacPro, very similar to your system, dual E5620, AMD video card, less memory but uses three disks.
    So, your system would be around the same rank as the one above, among the slowest 25% of all systems and something like 10 - 15 times slower than a fast system. You tax your system to the extreme with the GoPro Hero3 material, and the consequence is the slow performance you see.
    Sorry, not much you can do, other than get a new system. If you sell it now, it may get you a price, good enough to get a much faster Windows system and maybe even keep the change.  Simply said, you bought a MacPro for € 3.5 K, sell it for € 3 K, buy a PC for € 2.5 K that is around 5-6 times faster and your loss is recovered.
    However i will be buying a Samsung 840 Pro Series 256GB SSD Drive for Scratch within the month
    What a pity the MacPro does not have SATA 6G ports, only SATA 3G, because then that SSD will run at almost half speed.

  • UPGRADING AND MIXING MEMORY ON MY MAC PRO QUAD CORE DUAL 2.8 (Xeon)?

    Hello,
    I have a Mac Pro Quad Core Dual 2.8GHz (Xeons) with 4GB of memory (2 x 1GB Apple modules + 2 x 1GB other brand - Shown as "Manufacturer 0x855D") and now I want to fill the other 4 memory slots by adding an additional 16GB (4 x 4GB modules) for a total of 20GB of RAM.
    My 2 questions are:
    1.- In which order/pattern should I install these new 4 X 4GB modules along with my original Apple 2 x 1GB modules and the "Manufacturer 0x855D" 2 x 1GB modules the best way (for better performance)? - I have heard stories that if I do it improperly, I could slow down my Mac Pro...
    This is how I have them configured right now:
    Raiser A / DIMM 1 = 1GB (Manufaturer "0x830B") - I assume this is the Apple memory, right?
    Raiser A / DIMM 2 = 1GB (Manufaturer "0x830B")
    Raiser A / DIMM 3 = Empty
    Raiser A / DIMM 4 = Empty
    Raiser B / DIMM 1 = 1GB (Manufacturer "0x855D") - How can I find which manufacturer is this?
    Raiser B / DIMM 2 = 1GB (Manufacturer "0x855D")
    Raiser B / DIMM 3 = Empty
    Raiser B / DIMM 4 = Empty
    2.- What brand would be most compatible to work with my Apple 2GB (2 x 1GB) factory memory? Kingston? Crucial? Mushkin? iRam? Corsair? OWC? (Does OWC sell their own brand? or which one do they carry?-its not specified on their web)
    Thank you so much in advance for all your help!

    About RAM installation in the Mac Pro
    Mac Pro memory arrangement photos
    Mac Pro Memory Configuration
    Memory Tests- "2008" Mac Pro
    Ram should be installed minimally in matched pairs and optimally in matched quads. This means the memory modules are the same size and specifications. They should also be equipped with the Apple-certified style of heat sink.
    Brand really doesn't mean much as long as they work.

  • Error message on my Mac Pro Quad Core Dual

    Hello..I'm hoping someone out there can help or advise me.
    I turned on my mac this morning to find it's normal loading screen of grey with the darker grey logo in centre..all normal at this stage. This was followed by a wipe from top to bottom making the background grey a little darker and in the centre the apple logo was replaced by what appeared to be a semi transparent power button symbol with the words. "You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the restart button"
    I have tried this several times to no avail I have also zapped the P RAM again nothing. Can anyone out there help. I have a Mac Pro Quad Core Dual which is only a few months old and is up to date with its system software.
    I could be so grateful of any assistance.
    Warm regards
    Sophia

    Make an appointment. But in the meantime...
    So from cold boot, you can't do the Command Option P R through 2-3 full reboot cycles (don't let up)?
    Unplug everything and let it sit overnight without power cord or anything. That is the only way to rest the SMC system management controller on the 2008 model, the older model still had a reset button.
    Also learned that the 2008 Macs can all boot AHT if the original OEM installer was used to install the system and the drive has not be completely reformatted and retail OS X used, just holding down "D" on startup. But you have to
    Also, pull all your hard drives. Rule out that, which I have seen a hard drive cause panic on startup, which required disabling journaling and other repairs from Disk Utility and deleting caches, then repair, and finally do Safe Boot (shift key down on startup).
    The only way to test RAM is with TechTool Deluxe or Pro; with Memtest or Rember; and to test some devices is to try using a differnent one, keyboard and mouse included if you have any.
    Last hope: open case, look inside, take the two RAM Riser cards and pull out, check the DIMMs are fully seated.
    If you have 3rd party memory, remove that (would need to before taking in probably).
    Might want to put RAM back to way it shipped with 2 x 1GB and one DIMM on each Riser in slot one. Maybe that will wake this sleeping giant. Changing RAM config use to be one way to clear nvram in the distant past in the time of Arthur.
    PS: it is "odd" to find a BTO 3.2GHz system, and only 2GB. For memory performance, Barefeats found a marked improvement with 8 DIMMs, and of course Mac Pro really needs memory to feed 8 cores and pro apps (2GB would be okay for web and email type use only).

  • Windows – but Which? (What to install on Mac Pro Quad Core?)

    First, apologies in advance if this seems like repetition of a recent topic, but I read through the recent "Vista vs XP" thread and it didn't quite answer my questions.
    Basically, I'm planning on buying a Mac Pro "Quad Core" 2.8 and installing Boot Camp and a Windows OS startup. This puts me into the notoriously tricky area of picking the right version of Windows for my needs, something I haven't really had to deal with in regards to OS X.
    Basically, I'm not looking for something with too many bells and whistles or to much bloatware built into the OS. Also, I'll probably be using some older software/shareware, so backwards compatibility is an issue. On the other hand, I'd like something that works with the Quad Core architecture at its greatest efficiency.
    This means I'm wondering about a couple of features that I may or may not need, and it would be of great help if you folks could point me in the right direction regarding these:
    x64 – Since the Xeon processors in the Mac Pro are 64-bit processors, am I better off with "x64"-compatible versions of Windows (either Windows Vista or x64 versions of XP)? Will this cause problems starting up older programs that may not have been written for x64?
    *Dual Processor Support* – the Quad Core, of course, is a dual processor – will I get better performance from a version of Windows that list "Dual Processor Support" among its features (basically, the "pro", "business", or "ultimate" versions of XP and Vista)?
    If I need those features, I'm probably looking at getting either the x64 version of Windows XP Pro or the Business or Ultimate versions of Vista. However, I'm leaning against Vista based on backwards-compatibility and bloatware issues. That leaves XP Pro x64, but I might go for a more basic version of XP if I find out the x64 or DPS features aren't actually something I need. (The other "extras" in XP Pro don't sound like anything I need.)
    Also, I'm likely to install Parallel Desktop at some point and don't want a version of Windows that would have compatibility problems there, either.
    Anyway, any answers you folks can provide for me in this regard would be very helpful.
    Thanks in advance,
    Peter

    Truth is, I am disappointed in VMware Fusions slow walk toward full support for 64-bit and SP1 but 2.0 beta is getting there. Never used Parallels but best to check their own support forums. They also updated the 1.x version recently.
    http://communities.vmware.com/community/beta/fusion
    http://forums.parallels.com/
    You don't need anything first, except I would start with a new hard drive for Vista, don't even do anything with it and pull OS X drive, boot Vista DVD and go from there, just as you would normally. Much easier. After it is installed is when you need Apple BootCamp from your Leopard OEM DVD, install, and then Apple Software Update will take care of 2.1. And install your graphic drivers yourself.
    The problem(s) come with trying to use BootCamp Assist and setting up partitioning, and it only makes it harder - not easier - on Mac Pro (you aren't and don't want to use your OS X boot drive).
    Windows on Mac forum @ MacRumors
    http://forums.macrumors.com/forumdisplay.php?f=86
    And their Mac Pro area http://forums.macrumors.com which has a lot of Vista talk from Mac Pro owners.
    The only real issues are which graphics card to get today or in next weeks, what drives you are going with and other upgrades like memory (8 x 1GB is actually a good base ideal figure so all DIMM slots are taken up).
    Barefeats has a number of benchmark articles:
    Radeon 3870: http://www.hardmac.com/news/2008-06-16/#8451
    Vista graphics: http://www.barefeats.com/harper11.html
    Memory: http://www.barefeats.com/harper12.html
    Drives: http://www.barefeats.com/harper9.html
    WD 300GB Raptor: http://www.barefeats.com/hard103.html
    - this is the drive to die for, but not natively supported
    I buy most of the upgrades I need over the last ten years from OWC http://www.MacSales.com that specializes in Mac.
    http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/Mac-Pro-Memory
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Western%20Digital/WD6400AAKS/
    - until the WD "Black" series (I guess Blackbird name or SR71 are already taken) along with 3rd generation of their RE series drives. WD has been popular, reliable, with Mac Pro for last two years. Can't say the same of every vendor. Samsung F1 is also a real winner.
    If you buy only one book to understand and get the most out of OS X: "Mac OS X: The Missing Manual" (Pogue has a Missing Manual Series on most everything, and this is the most popular recommended for Mac OS).
    http://books.slashdot.org/books/08/02/27/1551206.shtml
    I needed 3-4 for Vista before I found "Administrator's Pocket Consultant" and O'Reilly's "Vista Annoyances" are both excellent along with MS Press's "Inside Out."

  • Are these Seagate 2TB drives compatible in my Mac Pro Quad Core 2.66 GHz?

    I still have an Apple Mac Pro "Quad Core" 2.66 that was introduced August 7, 2006. I currently have 4 of the following Seagate internal hard drives installed: ST3750640AS SEAGATE BARRACUDA 7200.10 - HARD DRIVE - 750 GB - INTERNAL - 3.5" - SATA-300 - 7200 RPM - BUFFER: 16 MB
    I want to know if these hard drives will work in this computer: Seagate Barracuda XT ST32000641AS 2TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive.This computer is powered by two 2.66 GHz dual core Intel Xeon 5150 processors.
    The old drives were purchased from NewEgg and I want to purchase the new ones from there also. Are these 2TB drives compatible in my computer?
    Thanks,
    Lou Hosta

    SATA is SATA.
    Apple introduced GPT (GUID) years ago to support 2TB and larger (default partition scheme).
    SATA III is also backward compatible with SATA II (otherwise, who would Seagate have to sell to?)
    The only issues have been with green drives, using green version for RAID or for performance purposes.

  • Mac Pro Quad core Intel Xeon upgrade advice please!

    Hi all, i have a Mac Pro Quad core 2 x 2.8ghz Intel Xeon (2008 model) with 4gb RAM.
    I am planning on giving it some upgrades and a fresh OS install as it is slowly grinding to a halt (particualrly noisey hard drives)
    Can anyone recommend best/fastest/silent! S-ATA hard drive to upgrade to?
    Can anyone recommend a good replacement ATAPI DL DVD-RW Drive as mine is also on its way out.
    Ram upgrade. Lots of space for RAM so what would you all recommend?
    Ultimately i am finding myself working with alot of large PS file and so would welcome any suggestions to improve/soup-up the processor/performance.
    Thanks for any advice in advance...

    24GB RAM gets cost ly when you look at 800MHz FBDIMMs in 2x4GB
    You shoudl have added more as 4GB is vary basic and miinimal
    Any SATA drive device is fine. WD Black 1-2-4TB / WD 10K VRs are fast but not as quiet though I do hear those WD Blacks.
    A single SSD for a system is nice.
    10.6.8 works best  in  that system.
    Your GPU most  probably is in need of an upgrade.
    You should never need to do a reinstall of the OS. Clone. Yes. And start wit h a new OS by not upgrade in place over the old OS but that is when to clean install, clone and use Set up Assis tant.

  • AVCHD and Mac Pro 8 Core

    Hey is there anyone on the forum editing AVCHD footage in FCS 2 on there Mac Pro 8 Core 2.8 GHZ.Would be great to hear how users machines are performing with this new format.
    thanks
    Alex

    Final Cut Studio:
    http://www.barefeats.com/harper.html
    http://www.barefeats.com/octopro5.html
    gives some idea while you wait for others to chime in. Nothing on FCS forum?

  • 2014 Mac Pro, 12-core vs 8-core

    I regards to Adobe CC performance, I am weighing between Apple's new Mac Pro 8-core and 12-core options, with dual AMD Firepro d700 GPUs, without a red-rocket.  I would like this computer to be a 7-ish year computer, or longer.  I understand the 8-core is crazy powerful, and pretty darn future-proof.  Will there be a benefit to spending the extra $1500 on the 12-core or just calling-it at the 8? 
    My workflow is all Adobe, and I am shooting all projects in full 4k at lowest compression available (6:1 Redcode with the Scarlet?, 3:1 for a run-of-the-mill 5k timelapse?).  My projects range from 4-6-min highly polished and graphics-intensive sizzle reels or industrials, to 15-20 min presentation reels.  There will be OCCASIONAL, but not frequent, 23 or 48 min pilots on the order for 2014.  There are also occasional TV spots in the mix as well, for older clients.  All projects are completed soup-to-nuts by me, with very rare and limited exceptions.  Those exceptions being a rare Cinema 4D counterpart to a larger project.  For those instances, I WOULD want to be able to handle the projects delivered by a vendor working with 3D modeling, although that's rare, and for "special occasions only!" 
    I'm sure you don't have all of the answers, but I'd like to get your perspective on the whole 8-core vs. 12-core debate.  Thank you for your time!

    I regards to Adobe CC performance, I am weighing between Apple's new Mac Pro 8-core and 12-core options, with dual AMD Firepro d700 GPUs, without a red-rocket.  I would like this computer to be a 7-ish year computer, or longer.  I understand the 8-core is crazy powerful, and pretty darn future-proof.  Will there be a benefit to spending the extra $1500 on the 12-core or just calling-it at the 8? 
    My workflow is all Adobe, and I am shooting all projects in full 4k at lowest compression available (6:1 Redcode with the Scarlet?, 3:1 for a run-of-the-mill 5k timelapse?).  My projects range from 4-6-min highly polished and graphics-intensive sizzle reels or industrials, to 15-20 min presentation reels.  There will be OCCASIONAL, but not frequent, 23 or 48 min pilots on the order for 2014.  There are also occasional TV spots in the mix as well, for older clients.  All projects are completed soup-to-nuts by me, with very rare and limited exceptions.  Those exceptions being a rare Cinema 4D counterpart to a larger project.  For those instances, I WOULD want to be able to handle the projects delivered by a vendor working with 3D modeling, although that's rare, and for "special occasions only!" 
    I'm sure you don't have all of the answers, but I'd like to get your perspective on the whole 8-core vs. 12-core debate.  Thank you for your time!

  • IMac 27" or Mac Pro Quad-Core?

    Hello all,
    I understand that this topic has been covered before although I am still unsure and I am looking for some help please!
    I am currently looking into purchasing a new computer to complete my architectural post-graduate degree. I currently use a PC, which I have done so for many years and initially I was thinking about buying a customisable Dell XPS sticking to using PC’s. Having recently been sent an email from Apple regarding student discounts offered on the Mac range I thought I'd look into getting an Apple having heard nothing but praise and also that it can also run Windows XP (via ‘Bootcamp’). This would mean I would effectively get 2 “computers” for the price of one, however, after hours of research, scrolling through web pages I am torn between the Mac Pro Quad-Core and the iMac 27” (Intel i7) !
    I mainly use Microstation V8/AutoCAD, Maxwell Render, Adobe Photoshop/Illustrator/InDesign, SketchUp, etc, and require a computer which can run programs quickly and efficiently, including some rendering. I will be switching between both operating systems, but will heavily use Windows to run most of my software.
    I was first hooked onto the iMac due to its sheer simplicity, elegance and also the specification (Intel i7) which was on par with the Dell I was considering. Although reading deeper on various forums, articles, I found that the Mac Pro Quad-Core might be a better alternative for future proofing (IE. Upgradable hardware) but it costs a little bit more than the iMac plus no monitor included. I feel that the iMac will suffice for what I need but I am not sure how about its longevity. I will be using the computer intensely for the next year, however, after I graduate I will see the computer being used casually.
    Another question is, if I were to use Bootcamp how would I share drivers (printers and scanners) between both Windows & Mac OSX? Also, when running Windows OS, would I need to install anti-virus software just like a PC?
    I am wondering if anybody could shed some light, assistance, experience and guidance to help me with my purchase please.
    Many thanks in advance!

    I would say a lot of it depends on just how extensively you expect to be using it after you graduate. Either system should carry you through a single year easily, but the Mac Pro obviously has the expandability advantage that will help extend the tail of its useful life.
    IMO, a reasonable expectation for an iMac is 2-3 years, while a Mac Pro is 3-4 for the quad core, 4-5 for the 2x4-core, and if you're buying one of those 12-core systems, odds are you're doing some serious number crunching and you'll be replacing the thing pretty quickly.
    So, if you think there's a better than 50% chance of needing to keep this computer for a longer than 2-3 years, go for the Mac Pro, otherwise you can get the iMac now and see where life has taken you in 2-3 years.
    As for bootcamp... Think of it like dual booting on a PC. Bootcamp does NOT allow you to run both operating systems at the same time, it's one or the other. Think of it like a time share. Programs like VMWare and Parallels let you run Windows in a virtual machine, but odds are you won't want the performance hit the emulation brings with it. So, there's no need to share drivers, because you'll need to install drivers for all hardware on both operating systems. You'll just need to make sure that any hardware you buy will work with both Mac OS X and Windows. When you're running Windows, it's no different from as if you had bought the Dell you were contemplating. Everything you would have done on the Dell as far as security software, you should do on the Mac with bootcamp. Mac OS X doesn't necessarily need AV software (yet), but Windows absolutely does.

  • Mac Pro 8 core - great, but not great... Any ideas please?

    Hi Guys,
    Firstly, let me say I'm Apple Certified in FCP so I'm not a newbie, however I am having a hard time coming to terms with my current situation.
    My G5 Quad appeared to be struggling on some basic (3 layers of text) real time stuff in PAL DV, and I was lucky enough to be able to upgrade to a Mac Pro 8 core 3.0GHz last week. "That will sort my stuttering problems" I thought...
    No it doesn't. Any new basic text (Boris) or any dissolve makes the playback jump, possibly worse than the G5 did. Aaaaargh! Anyone got any ideas why this shouldn't play back a dream?
    Also, does anyone know why the Blackmagic never appears as an option in the Effect Handling section of System Settings?
    Hope you can all help soon.
    p.s. I have not got any media on my startup disk, and the second disk is almost empty...

    Assuming your Scratch Disk is on the 2nd drive inside the Mac Pro, then let's see if that drive might be under-performing. Download Kona system Test v3 from http://www.aja.com/html/supportkona3swd.html and install it.
    Run the test on both drives, using the largest file size. Please report back on the read & write numbers you get on each drive.
    BTW, journaling should make no discernible difference on a SATA 3Gbps hard drive, and you most definitely SHOULD enable journaling on your boot volume. It doesn't matter either way for the media drive, but if you do not enable journaling for the boot volume, it will bite you in the butt someday. Trust me on that.
    Besides, journaling takes zero action on a disk read, which is what you are having problems with. It takes a tiny bit of time for the write heads to write the data to the journal, but not enough to make any real difference for your extremely speedy Mac Pro. The location of the journal file is on the outermost tracks on the platters, the fastest ones.

  • FCS 2 -- Mac Pro 4-core or 8-core?

    Been reading both the FCP forum and the MacPro forum and still not unsure which way to go.
    I'm an avid Avid user (sorry about that) for many years and now making the switch to FCS2. My confusion lies in which configuration to get to best maximize FCS2-- Mac Pro 4-core with maximum RAM or Mac Pro 8-core with 6 or 8 GB RAM? The machine will be used 90% for FCS 2 so that's the main decision-making factor here.
    Been reading articles about bottlenecks that make having 8-cores benign, but I find them hard to believe. Either way, the cost is about the same (the $$ saved buying the 4-core would be spent on more RAM).
    Thanks for your time and advice.

    With FCS the trick to maximising your performance is balance. Getting the balance right between processor performance, GPU performance, RAM and drive performance can often be a tricky thing. Unless you consider your system as a whole, any improvement in one area will often have little value.
    At the price of the 8-core upgrade (more than 50% of a whole new one!) I would think you'd get far better value by going with a 3GHz 4-core system and maxing out everything else.

  • Mac Pro 8-core RAM Configuration question

    I know there is a lot of questions about Ram fro Mac Pro on this site but I got a brand new Mac Pro 8-Core today, didn't buy RAM from Apple because of the obvious reason, 1GB (2x512mb) is what I have right now. I am interested in upgrading to 8GB...SO... my question is, What is the best RAM configuration for my Mac Pro? Read the list below. Keep in mind that I am a web/graphic designer so Photoshop is one of my main tools along with Aperture, DreamWeaver, Flash, Final Cut, Illustrator, etc...
    My options:
    2x4GB
    4x2GB or...
    8x1GB ???
    Please advise. Thanks in advance.

    2GB X 4 is best due to the combination of benefits of performance, cost, power consumption, thermal profile.
    Performance: groupings of four FB-DIMM allow 256 Bit memory access
    Cost: 2GB FB-DIMM are less expensive and more generally available than 4GB
    Power consumption: 4 FB-DIMM use 1/2 the power of 8
    Thermal Profile: fewer FB-DIMM generate less heat and allow more airflow

  • Mac Pro 8-Core - Slow, spinning ball, more...

    I have a new Mac Pro 8-Core. Equipped with 2x500GB drives, 4GB RAM, X1990 Video Card, Airport/Bluetooth, etc...
    I use many apps, CS3, mail, safari, FTP, Coda, and more, all day, everyday. The problem I am having is about performance. I replaced a dual core G5 with 8GB RAM with this one, and my G5 hardly ever gave me the spinning 'wait-for-it' ball, yet this one seems plaqued with it. Simply put, this machine is wicked slow, clumsy, and not at all what I expected. I have done the usual fix-its, including reinstalling the OS and even wiping the drive completely and installing the OS. Is it me, or is it this 8-Core?
    I'd like to know if any other owners of the 8-Core have similar issues, or issues at all.
    Thank you in advance for any responses to this post. Before taking this up with AppleCare I'd like to have some others experiences so I don't look like a fool when I do call.
    Mac Pro 8-Core - MBP 17"   Mac OS X (10.4.9)  

    Thank you, some very helpful hints as to what might be causing this. Here are some responses you might be interested in. Letters respond to each of your suggestions.
    A. - Probably. I'm watching RAM prices every day. I just don't have $400 to spend on RAM with the iPhone coming next month.
    B. - I never use this, so that can't be the problem.
    C. - Will look into this some more....Thanks, never heard this before now.
    D. - Agreed. I wish there were an easy way to list everything running in Rosetta.
    E. - The issues do remain when NOT running any CS3 apps, as for dedicated scratch drive, I've been thinking about this. But even more, I've been hearing a LOT about those fast 75GB 10k SATA drives (forget the name though)... seems a lot of people are using these as their boot drive. Any thoughts?
    F. - See above
    G. - Will do, thanks!
    H. - Done that... no issues found, so far.
    I. - Not sure how to access this... however, here are some numbers from Activity Monitor. Do these make sense to you?
    VM SIZE: 13.47GB (this seems to grow as more apps are opened)
    Page In/Outs: 54378/0
    Of course, right this second I'm only typing in Safari, everything else is idle.
    What concerns me, and I don't know if it should, is the size of the VM. Thinking years back I thought that if you had enough RAM you wouldn't use any Virtual Memory. Is this still the case? Would more RAM decrease the VM size in a new Mac?
    Also, I have 2 1TB OWC FW800 hard drives hooked up to my Mac. These are 2 disks each, 500GB each drive, set up in RAID 1. Each drive (WD) has 16MB of cache, so accessing these drives "should" be fast. However, any time, and I mean any time, I try to access one of these drives my computer takes at least 10 full seconds to display the contents of the drives, I get the spinning ball and I cannot do anything else while the computer tries to list the contents and open the drive. Is this to be expected?
    Thanks for the help, I truly appreciate it.

Maybe you are looking for