Performance problem after deploying bundle files

Hello,
I undeployed and made some changes on a km.resource.bundle PAR to update
some properties labels values. After deploying it again KM performance decreased
significantly and became very slow, we had to remove the PAR and restart portal
to restore its normal functioning.
Could you help me diagnose this?
some more info:
1 - The only changes I did was on the *.properties files.
2 - I had an error when generating the PAR again, which was solved adding the
external jar bc.crt_api.jar as reference.
3 - On SAP note 817876 the example project comes with this JAR into /lib folder,
my project just referenced it so my /lib folder is empty.
regards,
Rafael

Hi BP, thanks for the quick reply, I will try restarting it next time and check
if that solves the performance issue.
I was wondering if it was caused because of the bc.crt_api.jar library. Does it
have to be into the project structure or do I only need it for local reference? My guess
was that the application running on portal was accessing the lib into my machine
and thus causing the slowdown.
kind regards,
Rafael

Similar Messages

  • Got this error after deploying ear file into OC4J server.

    Hello Frnsz,
    Can any one help to resolve the following error :)
    Got this error after deploying ear file into OC4J server.
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.551 WARNING J2EE JSP-0027 Errors parsing file:/C:/Program Files/Java/oc4j/j2ee/home/applications/MyEarProject/MyEarProjectWeb/WEB-INF/tld/pager-taglib.tld
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.566 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 JSP Tld Cache Logging:
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.566 WARNING J2EE JSP-0027 Errors parsing file:/C:/Program Files/Java/oc4j/j2ee/home/applications/MyEarProject/MyEarProjectWeb/WEB-INF/tld/struts-bean.tld
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.598 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 JSP Tld Cache Logging:
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.598 WARNING J2EE JSP-0027 Errors parsing file:/C:/Program Files/Java/oc4j/j2ee/home/applications/MyEarProject/MyEarProjectWeb/WEB-INF/tld/struts-html.tld
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.629 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 JSP Tld Cache Logging:
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.629 WARNING J2EE JSP-0027 Errors parsing file:/C:/Program Files/Java/oc4j/j2ee/home/applications/MyEarProject/MyEarProjectWeb/WEB-INF/tld/struts-logic.tld
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.660 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 JSP Tld Cache Logging:
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.660 WARNING J2EE JSP-0027 Errors parsing file:/C:/Program Files/Java/oc4j/j2ee/home/applications/MyEarProject/MyEarProjectWeb/WEB-INF/tld/struts-nested.tld
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.691 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 JSP Tld Cache Logging:
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.691 WARNING J2EE JSP-0027 Errors parsing file:/C:/Program Files/Java/oc4j/j2ee/home/applications/MyEarProject/MyEarProjectWeb/WEB-INF/tld/struts-tiles.tld
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.723 NOTIFICATION Binding web application(s) to site default-web-site ends...
    2008-06-04 14:57:58.723 NOTIFICATION Application Deployer for MyEarProject COMPLETES. Operation time: 3422 msecs
    2008-06-04 14:58:04.895 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 JSP Tld Cache Logging:
    2008-06-04 14:58:04.910 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 JSP Tld Cache Logging:
    2008-06-04 14:58:04.926 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 JSP Tld Cache Logging:
    2008-06-04 14:58:04.942 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 JSP Tld Cache Logging:
    2008-06-04 14:58:04.957 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 JSP Tld Cache Logging:
    2008-06-04 14:58:04.973 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 JSP Tld Cache Logging:
    2008-06-04 14:58:04.973 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 loading Tld's into cachedConfigTable:
    2008-06-04 14:58:04.973 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 loading Tld's into cachedConfigTable:
    2008-06-04 14:58:04.973 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 loading Tld's into cachedConfigTable:
    2008-06-04 14:58:04.989 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 loading Tld's into cachedConfigTable:
    2008-06-04 14:58:04.989 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 loading Tld's into cachedConfigTable:
    2008-06-04 14:58:04.989 WARNING J2EE JSP-0003 loading Tld's into cachedConfigTable:
    2008-06-04 14:58:05.020 NOTIFICATION J2EE JSP-0008 Unable to dispatch JSP Page : Exception:oracle.jsp.parse.JspParseException: /WEB-INF/jsp/login.jsp: Line # 2, <%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/tld/struts-html.tld" prefix="html"%>
    Error: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.struts.taglib.html.MessagesTei
    Cheers,
    Cap

    Cross posted in correct forum
    [http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5302192]

  • How to change SessionTimeOut value after deployed war file in SunAPP Server

    Hi Guys,
    Any one can help and give some guidence How i can change the session time out value in web.xml after deployed the file on sun one application server.This is the code given below which i have to change the time of session from 5 minutes to 1 minute.
    <session-config>
         <session-timeout>5</session-timeout>
    </session-config>
    Regards,
    Suresh.Babu.Ramagani.

    For SunOne session configuration is in the sun-web.xml.
    http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2207/abxcz?a=view
    -steve

  • Performance problems after Update from 7.6.00.37 to 7.6.03.15

    Hi,
    after the Update from 7.6.00.37 to 7.6.03.15 in our live system we noticed a lot of performance problems. We have tested the new version before on our test system, but there don't noticed effects like this.
    We have 2 identical systems (Opteron 64 bit, openSuse 10.2) with log shipping between them. We updated first the standby system, switched from online to standby (with copy of cold log) and started the new server as online system. After that we run a complete backup (runtime: 1 hour) for starting a new backup history and for activating autolog. Then
    With the update we changed USE_OPEN_DIRECT to YES, but the performance of the system was very slow afterwards. After the backup it remains at a high load average (> 10, previous system had about 2-4), with nearly 100% of CPU usage for the db kernel process.
    Next day we switched USE_OPEN_DIRECT back to NO. The system first runs better, but periodically rises up to a load average of 6 and slow down the performance of various applications (somebody says about 10 times slower). Here we also noticed a high usage (now 200-300%) of the db kernel process.
    Our questions are:
    1. Has something basically changed from 7.6.00.37 to 7.6.03.15, so that our various applications (JDBC, ODBC and Perl/SQLDBC partially on old linux systems with drivers from 7.5.00.23) don't reach same performance as before?
    2. Are there any other (new) parameters, which can help? Maybe reducing MAXCPU from 4 to 3 for reserving capacities for the system (there is only one maxdb instance running)?
    3. Is the a possibility to switch back to 7.6.00.37 (only for worst case)?
    I have made some first steps with x_cons, but don't see any anomalies on the first look.
    Regards,
    Thomas

    Thomas Schulz wrote:>
    > > > Next day we switched USE_OPEN_DIRECT back to NO. The system first runs better, but
    > >
    > > What is it about this parameter that lets you think it may be the cause for your problems?
    > After changing it back to NO, the system runs better (lower load average) than with YES (but much slower than with old version!)
    Hmm... that is really odd. When using USE_OPEN_DIRECT there is actually less work to do for he operating system.
    > > > Our questions are
    > > >
    > > > 1. Has something basically changed from 7.6.00.37 to 7.6.03.15, so that our various applications (JDBC, ODBC and Perl/SQLDBC partially on old linux systems with drivers from 7.5.00.23) don't reach same performance as before?
    > >
    > > Yes - of course. Changes are what Patches are all about!

    > Are there any known problems with updating from 7.6.00.37 to 7.6.03.15?
    Well of course there are bugs that have been found inbetween the release of both versions, but I am not aware of something like the performance killer.
    We will have to check this in detail here.
    > > > I have made some first steps with x_cons, but don't see any anomalies on the first look.
    > >
    > > Ok, looking into what the system does when it uses CPU is a first good step.
    > > But what would be "anomalies" to you?
    >
    > Good question! I don't really know.
    Well - then I guess 'looking at the system' won't bring you far...
    > > Do you use DBAnalyzer? If not -> activate it!
    > > Does it gives you any warnings?
    > > What about TIME_MEASUREMENT? Is it activated on the system? If not -> activate it!
    >
    > OK, that will be our next steps.
    Great - let's see the warnings you get.
    Let us also see the DB Parameters you set.
    > > What parameters have changed due  to the patch installations (check the parameter history file)?
    > >
    > > What queries take longer now? What is the execution plan of them?
    >
    > It seems to happen for all selects on tables with a lot of rows (>10.000, partially without indexes because automatically generated). With the old version we had no problems with missing indexes or the general performance. Unfortunatly it is very difficult to extract some sql statements out of the JBoss applications. But even simple queries (without any join) runs slower, when the load average rises over 4-5.
    Hmm... the question here is still, if the execution plans are good enough to meet your expectations.
    E.g. for tables that you access via the primary key it actually doesn't matter how many rows a table has (not for MaxDB at least).
    > > BTW: how exactly do the tests look like that you've done on the testsystem?
    > Usage over 6 weeks with our JDBC development environment (JBoss), backup and restore with various combinations of USE_OPEN_DIRECT and USE_OPEN_DIRECT_FOR_BACKUP.
    Sounds like the I/O is your most suspect aspect for overall system performance...
    > > Was the testsystem a 1:1 copy of the productive machine before the upgrade test?
    > No - smaller hardware (32 bit), only 20% of data of the live system, few db users and applications.
    >
    > > How did you test the system performance with multiple parallel users?
    > Only while permanent development with the 2-3 developers and some parallel tests of backup/restore. Unfortunately no tests with many users/applications.
    Ok - so this is next to no testing at all when it comes to performance.
    > An UPDATE STATISTICS over all db users seems to change nothing. At the moment the system remains markedly slow and we are searching for reasons and solutions. Another attempt will be the change of MAXCPU from 4 to 3.
    Why do you want to do that? Have you observed any threads that don't get a CPU because all 4 cores are used by the MaxDB kernel?
    regards,
    Lars

  • [b]problem with deploy .war file

    Hi
    I am trying to deploy a war file. I have Oracle 9iAS (release 2) in Sun Solaris server.
    I am using the enterprise manager gui to try to deploy a .war file as follows.
    My .war file has the structure: folder META-INF, folder WEB-INF, and other folders. THe folder
    WEB-INF has the file web.xml and the folder classes.
    I connect to enterprise manager at port 1810 and go to the OC4J home page and under
    deployed applications, I choose under applications "Deploy WAR file". It takes me to the next page
    where I enter the war file (pippo.war)
    Application Name: pippo
    Map to URL: /pippo
    THe only choice I have then is to click the Deploy button. I then get the response
    "Failed to deploy web application "pippo". Jar file: /var/tmp/jar29056.tmp is missing its standard xml descriptor located at WEB-INF/web.xml"
    In that path there is not that file, there are 2 folders, one with the file .war and one with the file .ear
    I have no idea what this error message means.
    The documentation for deploying servlets in 9ias using enterprise manager makes no mention of this.
    Thanks,
    Marcella

    Marcella,
    Are you using Oracle9iAS 9.0.3 ?
    Does this happen with any war file ?
    Are you able to deploy a ear file without problems ?
    Can you please test if you can deploy your war in a
    OC4J standalone environment ? steps from the general faq available at http://otn.oracle.com/tech/java/oc4j
    How can I deploy a WAR file to OC4J standalone ?
    The command line deployment tool (admin.jar) requires an EAR file as it's deployment archive. To deploy a WAR file using this, you must package the WAR file within a EAR file.
    You can manually deploy a WAR file to OC4J However following are the steps involved in deploying a WAR file in OC4J.
    1. Copy the file to D:\oc4j\j2ee\home\applications where d:\oc4j is the location OC4J is installed in.
    copy mywar.war D:\oc4j\j2ee\home\applications
    2. Open the application.xml file in D:\oc4j\j2ee\home\config directory
    and add the following after the <web-module id="defaultWebApp" path="../default-web-app" />
    line:
    <web-module id="mywar" path="../applications/mywar.war" />
    3. Open the default-web-site.xml file in D:\oc4j\j2ee\home\config directory and add the following after the <default-web-app application="default" name="defaultWebApp" /> line:
    <web-app application="default" name="mywar" root="/mywar" />
    In Oracle9iAS Release 2; deployment of applications is done either using EM or via the DCM commands.
    thanks,
    -Prasad

  • Runtime exeception after deploying PAR file in portal

    Hi ,
    I am facing an issue during the deployment of PAR file in our  Quality portal. I have download the PAR file from the system-->import to the NWDS--> did the modification (only to the properties files as part of my requirement) -->Export as PAR file. I then undeploy the previous earlier PAR file and then upload the modified PAR file in portal. When i test the application , i received portal runtime error.
    I have also tried by downloading the PAR file for the same application from the production portal and tried importing to Quality system without making any modification to the PAR. I still face the same issue.
    Due to this issue, i am not able to bring the application back as its not getting deployed properly. Can anyone help me on this.
    Regards
    Ray

    Hi Ray,
    Are you sure your file is getting deployed properly. Can you verify if the time stamp of the PAR file is getting updated on each deployment or after you upload it through Portal.
    Also, please check the PAR file (size and it's contents by unzipping the PAR file) that you've downloaded from PROD and deploying on QAS to ensure that the file is not corrupted by any means during downloading.
    You can also ask your BASIS team to provide the PAR file directly from PROD server and try to upload it on QAS instead of you downloading it from PROD portal.
    Also, you can follow the below steps to download the PAR file yourself from PROD portal with Administrator ID:
    Browse to the following location : System administration->Support->Portal Runtime->Browse deployment->ROOT/WEB-INF/deployment/temp
    1. Find and Identify the PAR file and Copy the name of PAR file.
    2. Click on view instead of download link to save the PAR file. Keep the name of PAR file same while saving with .par extension.
    3. Deploy this file on QAS Portal.
    Please let us know the results.
    BR,
    Anurag

  • NWDI setup, problem while deploying .sca files on SAP PI 7.1 server

    Hi
    I have a SAP PI 7.1 server. I want to setup DTR on it.
    From service market place i downloaded the required .sca files
    Location:
    Support Packages and Patches --> Browse our Download Catalog --> SAP NetWeaver and complementary products --> SAP NETWEAVER PI --> SAP NETWEAVER PI 7.1 --> Entry by Component --> Development Infrastructure --> SAP NetWeaver and complementary products --> SAP NETWEAVER PI --> SAP NETWEAVER PI 7.1 --> Entry by Component --> Development Infrastructure
    - DICBS25P_1-10003500.SCA
    - DICMS25P_1-10003499.SCA
    - DIDTR25P_1-10003501.SCA
    When i try to deploy these files using JSPM (option:- Business Packages)
    It is not able to deploy CMS and CBS files and its giving error.
    Error for DICMS25P_1-10003499.SCA
    Archive
    <server>\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICMS25P_1-10003499.SCA for component sap.com/DI_CMS was admitted for deployment Deployment of archive
    <server>\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICMS25P_1-10003499.SCA --> tcctsappl.sda for component sap.com/tcctsappl is rejected because it depends on missing components Detailed message: 1. Unresolved dependencies: sap.com/tcctstransport_api not found in the admitted batch items and the repository Deployment of archive
    <server>\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICMS25P_1-10003499.SCA --> tcSLCMStsawebui.sda for component sap.com/tcSLCMStsawebui is rejected because deployment of other component it depends on is rejected Detailed message: 1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tcSLCMSWebUI'. Deployment of archive
    <server>\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICMS25P_1-10003499.SCA --> tcSLCMSWebUI.sda for component sap.com/tcSLCMSWebUI is rejected because deployment of other component it depends on is rejected Detailed message: 1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tcSLdiindex'. Deployment of archive
    <server>\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICMS25P_1-10003499.SCA --> tcSLdiindex.sda for component sap.com/tcSL~diindex is rejected because deployment of other component it depends on is rejected
    Error for DICBS25P_1-10003500.SCA
    Details message(s): Archive
    <server>\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICBS25P_1-10003500.SCA for component sap.com/DI_CBS was admitted for deployment Deployment of archive
    <server>\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICBS25P_1-10003500.SCA --> tc.CBS.Appl.sda for component sap.com/tc.CBS.Appl is rejected because deployment of other component it depends on is rejected Detailed message: 1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tc.CBS.WebUI'. Deployment of archive
    <server>\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICBS25P_1-10003500.SCA --> tc.CBS.WebUI.sda for component sap.com/tc.CBS.WebUI is rejected because deployment of other component it depends on is rejected Detailed message: 1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tcdicbsjlinwd'. Deployment of archive
    <server>\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICBS25P_1-10003500.SCA --> tcdicbsjlinwd.sda for component sap.com/tcdicbs~jlinwd is rejected because deployment of other component it depends on is rejected Detailed message: 1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tc.CBS.Service'. Deployment of archive
    <server>\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICBS25P_1-10003500.SCA --> tc.CBS.CommonPart.sda for component sap.com/tc.CBS.CommonPart is rejected because it depends on missing components Detailed message: 1. Unresolved dependencies: sap.com/tc.CBS.DBDefs not allowed between software types: primary-library --> JDDSCHEMA Deployment of archive
    <server>\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICBS25P_1-10003500.SCA --> tc.CBS.Service.sda for component sap.com/tc.CBS.Service is rejected because deployment of other component it depends on is rejected Detailed message: 1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tc.CBS.CommonPart'. See Deploy Controller log F:\usr\sap\PS2\DVEBMGS00\j2ee\JSPM\log\log_2011_11_21_16_44_12\deploy_2011-11-21_17-06-01.log for details.
    Please Help.
    Regards
    Osman Jabri
    Edited by: Osman Jabri on Nov 21, 2011 12:40 PM

    Deploy status is 'Admitted'
    Deployment Items -
         1. Client path '
    hydhtc130380d\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICBS25P_1-10003500.SCA'
         Sdu info :name 'DI_CBS', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P25_D', version '1000.7.00.25.1.20110905193551'
              Deploy status is 'Admitted'
              Time statistics:
              Contained DCs:
              1.1:name 'tc.CBS.Appl', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P25_D', version '10937350', software type ('J2EE', sub type ''), dependencies :[( name 'tc.CBS.API', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tc.CBS.CommonPart', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.tc.Logging', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.security.api.sda', vendor 'sap.com') ]          
                        Deploy status is 'Skipped'
                        Description:'1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tc.CBS.WebUI'.'.
              1.2:name 'tc.CBS.WebUI', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P20_C', version '2930415', software type ('J2EE', sub type ''), dependencies :[( name 'tc.CBS.CommonPart', vendor 'sap.com') ]          
                        Deploy status is 'Skipped'
                        Description:'1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tcdicbs~jlinwd'.'.
              1.3:name 'tcdicbs~jlinwd', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P20_C', version '2930416', software type ('J2EE', sub type ''), dependencies :[( name 'tc.CBS.CommonPart', vendor 'sap.com') ]          
                        Deploy status is 'Skipped'
                        Description:'1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tc.CBS.Service'.'.
              1.4:name 'tc.CBS.CommonPart', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P25_D', version '10927802', software type ('primary-library', sub type ''), dependencies :[( name 'tc.CBS.API', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tc.CBS.DBDefs', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.tc.Logging', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.security.api.sda', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcdtr.clientvfs-adl', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'opensql', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.guid', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'sapxmltoolkit', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcCBSComponentLibrary', vendor 'sap.com') ]          
                        Deploy status is 'PrerequisiteViolated'
                        Description:'1. Unresolved dependencies:
    sap.com/tc.CBS.DBDefs     not allowed between software types: primary-library --> JDDSCHEMA'.
              1.5:name 'tc.CBS.Service', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P25_C', version '10522285', software type ('primary-service', sub type ''), dependencies :[( name 'tc.CBS.API', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tc.CBS.CommonPart', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.tc.Logging', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcdtr.clientvfs-adl', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'opensql', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.guid', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'sapxmltoolkit', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcCBSComponentLibrary', vendor 'sap.com') ]          
                        Deploy status is 'Skipped'
                        Description:'1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tc.CBS.CommonPart'.'.
              1.6:name 'tc.CBS.DBDefs', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P20_C', version '2929767', software type ('JDDSCHEMA', sub type ''), dependencies :[none]          
                        Deploy status is 'Admitted'
         2. Client path '
    hydhtc130380d\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DICMS25P_1-10003499.SCA'
         Sdu info :name 'DI_CMS', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P25_D', version '1000.7.00.25.1.20110905193601'
              Deploy status is 'Admitted'
              Time statistics:
              Contained DCs:
              2.1:name 'tcctsappl', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P25_C', version '10521775', software type ('J2EE', sub type ''), dependencies :[( name 'tcctstransport_api', vendor 'sap.com') ]          
                        Deploy status is 'PrerequisiteViolated'
                        Description:'1. Unresolved dependencies:
    sap.com/tcctstransport_api     not found in the admitted batch items and the repository'.
              2.2:name 'tcSLCMStsawebui', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P20_C', version '2930427', software type ('J2EE', sub type ''), dependencies :[( name 'tcSLCMSPCS', vendor 'sap.com') ]          
                        Deploy status is 'Skipped'
                        Description:'1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tcSLCMS~WebUI'.'.
              2.3:name 'tcSLCMScversproxy', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70VAL_C', version '1496430', software type ('J2EE', sub type ''), dependencies :[none]          
                        Deploy status is 'Admitted'
              2.4:name 'tcSLCMSconfigdbschema', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P20_C', version '2929860', software type ('JDDSCHEMA', sub type ''), dependencies :[none]          
                        Deploy status is 'Admitted'
              2.5:name 'tcSLCMSPCSDBSchema', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P20_C', version '2929768', software type ('JDDSCHEMA', sub type ''), dependencies :[none]          
                        Deploy status is 'Admitted'
              2.6:name 'tcSLCMSWebUI', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P23_D', version '7714571', software type ('J2EE', sub type ''), dependencies :[( name 'tcSLCMSPCS', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcSLCMSIDEClient', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tccom.sap.tmw.clients~_ctsa_client', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tc.httpclient', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'applocking', vendor 'sap.com') ]          
                        Deploy status is 'Skipped'
                        Description:'1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tcSLdiindex'.'.
              2.7:name 'tcSLCMSTCSEar', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P25_D', version '10947857', software type ('J2EE', sub type ''), dependencies :[( name 'tc.CBS.API', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.util.monitor.jarm', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tc.httpclient', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.tc.Logging', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcsecsecurestorageservice', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcdtr.clientvfs-adl', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcjmx', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcSLCMSUtil', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.util.monitor.grmg', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcCBSComponentLibrary', vendor 'sap.com') ]          
                        Deploy status is 'Admitted'
              2.8:name 'tcSLCMS~cleanuptool', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70VAL_C', version '1552404', software type ('FS', sub type ''), dependencies :[none]          
                        Deploy status is 'Admitted'
              2.9:name 'tcSLdiindex', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P25_D', version '10947869', software type ('J2EE', sub type ''), dependencies :[( name 'tcSLCMSPCS', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcSLCMSIDEClient', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcSLCMS~Util', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'security.class', vendor 'sap.com') ]          
                        Deploy status is 'Skipped'
                        Description:'1. Unresolved dependency problem in chain of dependent item 'sap.com_tcSLCMS~PCS'.'.
              2.10:name 'tcSLCMSPCS', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P25_D', version '10947869', software type ('J2EE', sub type ''), dependencies :[( name 'tc.CBS.API', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcSLCMSIDEClient', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.security.api.sda', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.lcr.api.cimclient', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcsecsecurestorageservice', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcdiscmtransport_api', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.aii.ibtransportclient', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'applocking', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcdtr.clientvfs-adl', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcjmx', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcSLCMSUtil', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'security.class', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcCBSComponentLibrary', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.util.monitor.jarm', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tccom.sap.tmw.clients_ctsa_client', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcSLCMScversproxy', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.aii.util.xml', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'tcSLCMS~TCSEar', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.aii.util.misc', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.guid', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'keystore', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'sapxmltoolkit', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.exception', vendor 'sap.com') , ( name 'com.sap.util.monitor.grmg', vendor 'sap.com') ]          
                        Deploy status is 'PrerequisiteViolated'
                        Description:'1. Unresolved dependencies:
    sap.com/tccom.sap.tmw.clients_ctsa_client     not found in the admitted batch items and the repository'.
         3. Client path '
    hydhtc130380d\sapmnt\trans\EPS\in\DIDTR25P_1-10003501.SCA'
         Sdu info :name 'DI_DTR', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P25_D', version '1000.7.00.25.1.20110908142653'
              Deploy status is 'Admitted'
              Time statistics:
              Contained DCs:
              3.1:name 'tcjdiheartbeat~enterpriseapp', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P25_D', version '10937328', software type ('J2EE', sub type ''), dependencies :[none]          
                        Deploy status is 'Admitted'
              3.2:name 'tcdtrconsole~sda', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70VAL_C', version '1586999', software type ('FS', sub type ''), dependencies :[none]          
                        Deploy status is 'Admitted'
              3.3:name 'tcdtrdbschema', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P20_C', version '2929861', software type ('JDDSCHEMA', sub type ''), dependencies :[none]          
                        Deploy status is 'Admitted'
              3.4:name 'tcdtrenterpriseapp', vendor 'sap.com', location 'MAIN_APL70P25_D', version '10937327', software type ('J2EE', sub type ''), dependencies :[none]          
                        Deploy status is 'Admitted'
    Nov 21, 2011 5:06:19 PM  [Info  ]:+++ Validation finished with status 'Success' +++[ deployerId=4 ]
    Nov 21, 2011 5:06:19 PM  [Path  ]:+++++ End  V A L I D A T E action +++++[ deployerId=4 ]. Total time:[#16: 18.367 sec]

  • Performance problems after EHP4

    Hello,
    We have a small problem.
    After installing EHP4 for ERP and EHP1 for Netweaver 7 on AIX Oracle installation, an increase in dialog response time is reported.
    We upgraded last September 2009, and from then and to now, we have gone from an average of 800ms to 1200ms in dialog response time.
    When we analyze transactions, there is no specific transaction that is the cause, it looks more like an allover trend, that the system in general has become slower.
    When we look at fx. Earlywatch reports, it is quit obvious, that the u201Cproblemsu201D started just after implementing the EHP.
    We are attacking this on several fronts, and I am looking on the sap basis part.
    I was not a part of the upgrade team, so what I am looking into, is weather maybe some notes has been forgotten or something else. I am especially interested in notes and steps that should have been performed on Oracle, in connection with the EHP upgrade.
    Is there anybody in here that have experienced similar problems, after applying EHPs?
    Best Regards,
    Kenneth
    Edited by: Kenneth Nielsen on Jan 22, 2010 9:45 AM

    Hi Kenneth,
    In which area that you are having much interval  in total rsponse time? If it is looking under DB time may be cause with Oracle bug fixes..check your all Oracle patches(mainly related to performance).
    And explore the DB version and patch list that presently you had.
    Regards,
    Nick Loy

  • Performance problems after installing XP Service Pack 3

    Hello,
    After upgrading my client XP-machine to Service Pack 3, I have serious performance issues working with ApEx. Firstly, establishing the connection to the ApEx Workspace and then logging in both are very slow. Navigating through the workspace works fine, however when I then open any page for editing and/or try to run it, again it is very slow. As we work with PL/sql Embedded gateway I have changed the parameter SHARED_SERVERS to 10, but this did not make any difference. Remotely connecting to this server in other ways such as ping, connecting to xmlpserver, mapping network drives and connecting to the database all work fine.
    My collegues also working witk Service Pack 3 have no performance issues. However when I performed a rollback of the XP Service Pack 3, the performance issue was gone!
    Does anyone know of any issues similar to this problem?
    Regards,
    Ben van Dort

    This issue is probably related to an update of InternetExplorer by Service Pack 3. Working with Firefox instead of IE gives no performance problems whatsoever.
    Version of IE after Service Pack 3: 6.0.2900.5512.xpsp_sp3_gdr.080814-1236CO
    Ben

  • Serious performance problems after updating from 10.5.6 to 10.5.7

    I've got a Macbook Pro C2D 15" (late 2006). After updating the system from 10.5.6 to 10.5.7 and quicktime to 7.6.2, I experience serious performance problems which I have never seen before:
    -From time to time, kernel_task has peaks in activity monitor (consumes a lot of CPU). In that moment, the mouse hangs for a short moment and audio playback is distorted/has drop outs.
    -Recording audio consumes a lot of CPU (independent of the audio application).
    -Video playback consumes a lot of CPU, regardless if I use VLC or the quicktime player.
    Any idea what could be done? Thanks in advance.

    After a few days of using CoolBook I report that my 1st generation MacBook Air is now reliable and never overheating, regardless of environment conditions.
    I must point out that I do believe that it really is something new in 10.5.7 that is causing this problem as my environmental conditions have not changed and even Summer in Dublin still sees temperatures no more than 72F/22C. I am now in Madrid, where the environment is quite different, and I am still having no problem with kernel_task spinning.
    I plan on reporting my problem to Apple anyway and being aggressive about the issue as MacLovinRanga did in this thread (http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9647353#9647353). Perhaps many/all of those of us having this problem will obtain new MacBook Airs.
    Joe Kiniry

  • 3D performance problems after upgrading memory

    I recently purchased an additional 2GB of memory to try and extend the life of my aging computer.  I installed the memory yesterday and Windows seems to recognize it (reporting now 3.3GB) but when I dropped into WoW (pretty much the only game I have) the 3D performance was down from the usual 60FPS @ 1600x1080 to a bleak 20 (at best) and the CPU utilization went to about 80% on both cores (with ~20% kernel usages).  Basically WoW was being software 3D rendered!!!
    I went through the usual reinstall drivers, reboot, etc... and couldn't find a fix.  I powered down, pulled out 2 of the memory sticks, booted up, and dropped into WoW - it ran at the full 60FPS and CPU utilization was very low (i.e. back to GPU Hardware 3D rendering).  I powered down again, swapped the 2 sticks for the other 2 sticks, booted up, and dropped into WoW - again it ran 100% fine.  So I powered down, put all four sticks in, booted back up, and when I dropped into WoW it was running in the software 3D rendering mode (20FPS at best and High CPU/Kernel usage).
    I've tried the /PAE option in boot.ini - no joy.  I've tried /MAXMEM = to 3300, 3072, 3000, and even 2048 - no joy in any of those cases.  Has anyone seen anything like this before?  Or have suggestions to fix (other than going to Win7-64)?
    All info in signature is up to date.
    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Quote
    Well his last post was a little over 6 hours ago so he was up pretty late.
    Looks like nothing one does in here goes completely unnoticed.   
    Anyway, I am done sleeping now.
    Quote
    his 2 Pfennig's worth.  I know, I know it's Euro's now.
    Yeah, and what used to be "Pfennige" is now also called "Cents" and here are mine:
    Quote
    I've tried the /PAE option in boot.ini - no joy.  I've tried /MAXMEM = to 3300, 3072, 3000, and even 2048 - no joy in any of those cases.  Has anyone seen anything like this before?  Or have suggestions to fix (other than going to Win7-64)?
    PAE or Physical Memory Extension will not do anything as Microsoft has castrated this feature to such an extend that it has nothing to do with memory addressing anymore when in comes to Windows XP:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension#Microsoft_Windows
    Quote
    Windows XP Service Pack 2 and later, by default, on processors with the no-execute (NX) or execute-disable (XD) feature, runs in PAE mode in order to allow NX. The NX (or XD) bit resides in bit 63 of the page table entry and, without PAE, page table entries only have 32 bits; therefore PAE mode is required if the NX feature is to be exploited. However, desktop versions of Windows (Windows XP, Windows Vista) limit physical address space to 4 GiB for driver compatibility reasons.
    The feature is already automatically enabled.  But since is original function (Address Extension) does no longer exist when it comes to the desktop versions of Windows XP, it won't really do anything you would ever notice.
    About the /MAXMEM Switch:  In Windows 32bit operating systems, every process is limited to 2GB of memory.  The point of the switch is to allow certain applications (or their run-time process) to occupy a higher amount of system memory than 2GB.  However, the culprit here is that only those applications are able to utilize this ability that have been programmed (or compiled) accordingly.  A special flag (large memory aware) has to be implemented.  Otherwise, these application will be restricted to 2GB even though the /MAXMEM Switch has been set to extend the 2GB limit to 3GB.  Most 32bit applications come without the "large memory aware" flag and that is why usually, settings the switch won't change anything.
    In any case, it is unlikely that /PAE (even if it would not be castrated) and /MAXMEM would have an impact on your actual issue because I doubt that it has much to do with either memory adressing or the memory limit of an indiviual Windows process.
    Quote
    the 3D performance was down from the usual 60FPS @ 1600x1080 to a bleak 20 (at best) and the CPU utilization went to about 80% on both cores (with ~20% kernel usages).
    There are a couple of hardware based explanations to consider here.  Let's start with the most obvious one:
    1. 975X Memory Controller
    The main reason that the system chooses to automatically set the Memory Speed to DDR2-667 even though DDR2-800 modules are installed, is that by design the memory controller of the Intel 975X Chipset does not natively support DDR2-800 modules, but
    >>Intel® 975X Express Chipset Datasheet - For the Intel® 82975X Memory Controller Hub (MCH)<< [Page 20]
    This means, that from the point of view of the memory controller, operating the memory @DDR2-800 actually means overclocking it (with all potential side effects).
    Basically, if your initial problem disappears as soon as you reduce the memory speed to DDR2-667, the design limitation of the memory controller may explain your findings.
    2. Different memory modules
    If I read your signature correctly, you are actually mixing two different kits/models of RAM (CM2X1024-6400C4DHX and  CM2X1024-6400C4).  This can work of course, but in practice it not necessarely does under all circumstances. 
    This list  (-> http://ramlist.i4memory.com/ddr2/) indicates that there are at least 14 different module types/revisions of Corsair DDR2-800 / CL4 modules that utilize a wide range of different memory chips (Elpida, ProMos, Micron, Infinion, Powerchip, Qimonda, Samsung, Infinion etc.).  Even though the superficial specifications for these chips appear to be pretty similar (DDR2-800 / CL5 / CL4), this does not necessarely mean that the modules will respond to the same operating conditions in the same way. There may be small difference in sub-timings/sub-latencies and/or the general responsiveness of the ICs which may affect the operating behaviour of the memory controller (which by the way also includes the PCI-Express interface which your video card is hooked up to).
    And again:  If running the system @DDR2-667 solves your issue, the possible explanation is that higher clock speeds may amplify (or trigger) potential performance problems that could have to do with the use of non-identical memory modules.
    Furthermore: It is also possible that the memory controller's design limitations and the potential compatibility problems that may be attributed to mixing different modules types may reinforce each other in terms of reduced system performance.
    3. The BIOS may have an impact as well
    There has been known issue with the use of certain video cards in conjunction with 4GB of system memory on this mainboard:
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=107301.0
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=105955.0
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=99818.msg798951#msg798951
    What may have come out as graphics/display corruption in earlier BIOS Releases may come out as reduced system performance when using the latest BIOS Release.  Of course, this is hard to prove, but I thought I'd mention it anyway.  May I ask what amount of video memory your card has onboard?
    Fortunately, there is a BIOS version that you could consider to try in this matter.  It is not only the last BIOS Release that could be used in order to avoid the corruption issue, but it is (in my oppionion) the best BIOS Version that was ever released for the 975X Platinum PUE Mainboard:  W7246IMS.716 [v7.1b6].  I have been using this mainboard for almost two years and have tested almost every BIOS Release that ever came out and I always went back to v7.1b6 as "ground zero". 
    It will properly support your E6600 (so you don't have to worry about that) and as far as I remember, there are no known compatibility issues with other components.  So maybe, you want to give this a shot.
    The bottom line is that in a worst case scenario, the problem you describe could be caused by all of the above things at the same time.  You cannot really do anything about the 975X Chipset Specifications and the only way to rule out explanation #2 is to test modules that are actually identical (same model number, revision and memory chips).  A test of the 7.1b6 BIOS Release is something you should consider.  It may be the only way to test the BIOS Hypothesis.
    This post turned out to be longer than I intended, but then again, I am well-rested after a good sleep and the wake-up coffee is kicking in pretty good.

  • Problem in deploying war file

    Hi,
    I have a problem in deploying a war file in Weblogic 7. I have deployed successfully
    a jar file containing an ejb. I would like to deploy a war file which web.xml
    has an <ejb-ref> element referencing a session bean contained in the jar previously
    deployed.
    I have the following error:
    Module Name: PSSC-web, Error: weblogic.j2ee.DeploymentException: Could not setup
    environment - with nested exception:
    [weblogic.deployment.EnvironmentException: ejb-ref ejb/PSSCLdapUserEJB requires
    an ejb-link or jndi-name]
    at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEApplicationContainer.activate(J2EEApplicationContainer.java:1093)
    at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEApplicationContainer.activate(J2EEApplicationContainer.java:1074)
    at weblogic.management.deploy.slave.SlaveDeployer.processPrepareTask(SlaveDeployer.java:1110)
    at weblogic.management.deploy.slave.SlaveDeployer.prepareUpdate(SlaveDeployer.java:730)
    at weblogic.drs.internal.SlaveCallbackHandler$1.execute(SlaveCallbackHandler.java:24)
    at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:213)
    at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:189)
    >
    My configuration files are:
    weblogic-ejb-jar.xml
    <weblogic-ejb-jar>
    <weblogic-enterprise-bean>
    <ejb-name>ejb/PSSCLdapUserEJB</ejb-name>
    <jndi-name>PSSCLdapUserEJB</jndi-name>
    </weblogic-enterprise-bean>
    </weblogic-ejb-jar>
    ejb-jar.xml
    <ejb-jar>
    <display-name>Ldap User</display-name>
    <enterprise-beans>
    <session>
    <ejb-name>ejb/PSSCLdapUserEJB</ejb-name>
    <home>pssc.utils.ejb.PSSCLdapUserEJHome</home>
    <remote>pssc.utils.ejb.PSSCLdapUserEJ</remote>
    <ejb-class>pssc.utils.ejb.PSSCLdapUserEJBean</ejb-class>
    <session-type>Stateful</session-type>
    <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
    </session>
    </enterprise-beans>
    <assembly-descriptor>
    <container-transaction>
    <method>
    <ejb-name>ejb/PSSCLdapUserEJB</ejb-name>
    <method-name>*</method-name>
    </method>
    <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
    </container-transaction>
    </assembly-descriptor>
    <ejb-client-jar>LDAPUSER</ejb-client-jar>
    </ejb-jar>
    web.xml
    <web-app>
    <ejb-ref>
    <ejb-ref-name>ejb/PSSCLdapUserEJB</ejb-ref-name>
    <ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type>
    <home>pssc.utils.ejb.PSSCLdapUserEJHome</home>
    <remote>pssc.utils.ejb.PSSCLdapUserEJ</remote>
    </ejb-ref>
    </web-app>
    weblogic.xml
    <weblogic-web-app>
         <ejb-reference-description>
         <ejb-ref-name>
         ejb/PSSCLdapUserEJB
         </ejb-ref-name>
         <jndi-name>
         PSSCLdapUserEJB
         </jndi-name>
         </ejb-reference-description>
    </weblogic-web-app>
    Configuration files seems correct to me, but the deployment of the war is not
    working..
    Does someone have an idea of what is the problem?
    Thanks in advance,
    Giuseppe

    Hi,
    I have a problem in deploying a war file in Weblogic 7. I have deployed successfully
    a jar file containing an ejb. I would like to deploy a war file which web.xml
    has an <ejb-ref> element referencing a session bean contained in the jar previously
    deployed.
    I have the following error:
    Module Name: PSSC-web, Error: weblogic.j2ee.DeploymentException: Could not setup
    environment - with nested exception:
    [weblogic.deployment.EnvironmentException: ejb-ref ejb/PSSCLdapUserEJB requires
    an ejb-link or jndi-name]
    at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEApplicationContainer.activate(J2EEApplicationContainer.java:1093)
    at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEApplicationContainer.activate(J2EEApplicationContainer.java:1074)
    at weblogic.management.deploy.slave.SlaveDeployer.processPrepareTask(SlaveDeployer.java:1110)
    at weblogic.management.deploy.slave.SlaveDeployer.prepareUpdate(SlaveDeployer.java:730)
    at weblogic.drs.internal.SlaveCallbackHandler$1.execute(SlaveCallbackHandler.java:24)
    at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:213)
    at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:189)
    >
    My configuration files are:
    weblogic-ejb-jar.xml
    <weblogic-ejb-jar>
    <weblogic-enterprise-bean>
    <ejb-name>ejb/PSSCLdapUserEJB</ejb-name>
    <jndi-name>PSSCLdapUserEJB</jndi-name>
    </weblogic-enterprise-bean>
    </weblogic-ejb-jar>
    ejb-jar.xml
    <ejb-jar>
    <display-name>Ldap User</display-name>
    <enterprise-beans>
    <session>
    <ejb-name>ejb/PSSCLdapUserEJB</ejb-name>
    <home>pssc.utils.ejb.PSSCLdapUserEJHome</home>
    <remote>pssc.utils.ejb.PSSCLdapUserEJ</remote>
    <ejb-class>pssc.utils.ejb.PSSCLdapUserEJBean</ejb-class>
    <session-type>Stateful</session-type>
    <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
    </session>
    </enterprise-beans>
    <assembly-descriptor>
    <container-transaction>
    <method>
    <ejb-name>ejb/PSSCLdapUserEJB</ejb-name>
    <method-name>*</method-name>
    </method>
    <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
    </container-transaction>
    </assembly-descriptor>
    <ejb-client-jar>LDAPUSER</ejb-client-jar>
    </ejb-jar>
    web.xml
    <web-app>
    <ejb-ref>
    <ejb-ref-name>ejb/PSSCLdapUserEJB</ejb-ref-name>
    <ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type>
    <home>pssc.utils.ejb.PSSCLdapUserEJHome</home>
    <remote>pssc.utils.ejb.PSSCLdapUserEJ</remote>
    </ejb-ref>
    </web-app>
    weblogic.xml
    <weblogic-web-app>
         <ejb-reference-description>
         <ejb-ref-name>
         ejb/PSSCLdapUserEJB
         </ejb-ref-name>
         <jndi-name>
         PSSCLdapUserEJB
         </jndi-name>
         </ejb-reference-description>
    </weblogic-web-app>
    Configuration files seems correct to me, but the deployment of the war is not
    working..
    Does someone have an idea of what is the problem?
    Thanks in advance,
    Giuseppe

  • Forbiden page after deploying war file

    I made a small jsp project in Jdeveloper, which displays a single view. I didn't use any speciel authorization process. After deploying the war file I don't see anything.
    I did evething according the tutorial, but I havent any success. Do I need any speciel configuration or settings in Jdev or AS?
    Thanx
    Zoltan

    Zoltan,
    more information is needed about the error and the JDeveloper version you are using.
    Frank

  • Forbidden page after deploying war file

    I made a small jsp project in Jdeveloper, which displays a single view. I didn't use any speciel authorization process. After deploying the war file I don't see anything.
    I did evething according the tutorial, but I havent any success. Do I need any speciel configuration or settings in Jdev or AS?
    Thanx
    Zoltan

    Zoltan,
    more information is needed about the error and the JDeveloper version you are using.
    Frank

  • Changing faces-config.xml after deploying ear file

    Hi,
    What would be the steps to follow if we want to change contenets of web application configuration files (for example, faces-config.xml) after app.ear file has been deployed?
    The app.ear file contains the faces-config.xml, and we are using Oracle AS 10.1.3.
    Thanks,
    Jean

    see my answer at
    Change web app config file of deployed app

Maybe you are looking for