Performance to fetch result set from stored procedure.

I read some of related threads, but couldn't find any good suggestions about the performance issue to fetch the result set from a stored procedure.
Here is my case:
I have a stored procedure which will return 2,030,000 rows. When I run the select part only in the dbartisan, it takes about 3 minutes, so I know it's not query problem. But when I call the stored procedure in DBArtisan in following way:
declare cr SYS_REFCURSOR;
firstname char(20);
lastname char(20);
street char(40);
city char(20);
STATE varchar2(2);
begin DISPLAY_ADDRESS(cr);
DBMS_OUTPUT.ENABLE(null);
LOOP
FETCH cr INTO firstname,lastname,street, city, state;
EXIT WHEN cr%NOTFOUND;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE( firstname||','|| lastname||','|| street||',' ||city||',' ||STATE);
END LOOP;
CLOSE cr;
end;
It will take about 100 minutes. When I used DBI fetchrow_array in perl code, it took about same amount of time. However, same stored procedure in sybase without using cursor, and same perl code, it only takes 12 minutes to display all results. We assume oracle has better performance. So what could be the problem here?
The perl code:
my $dbh = DBI->connect($databaseserver, $dbuser, $dbpassword,
{ 'AutoCommit' => 0,'RaiseError' => 1, 'PrintError' => 0 })
or die "couldn't connect to database: " . DBI->errstr;
open OUTPUTFILE, ">$temp_output_path";
my $rc;
my $sql="BEGIN DISPLAY_ADDRESS(:rc); END;";
my $sth = $dbh->prepare($sql) or die "Couldn't prepare statement: " . $dbh->errstr;
$sth->bind_param_inout(':rc', \$rc, 0, { ora_type=> ORA_RSET });
$sth->execute() or die "Couldn't execute statement: " . $sth->errstr;
while($address_info=$rc->fetchrow_arrayref()){
my ($firstname, $lastname, $street, $city, $STATE) = @$address_info;
print OUTPUTFILE $firstname."|".$lastname."|".$street."|".$city."|".$STATE;
$dbh->commit();
$dbh->disconnect();
close OUTPUTFILE;
Thanks!
rulin

Thanks for you reply!
1) The stored procedure has head
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE X_OWNER.DISPLAY_ADDRESS
cv_1 IN OUT SYS_REFCURSOR
AS
err_msg VARCHAR2(100);
BEGIN
--Adaptive Server has expanded all '*' elements in the following statement
OPEN cv_1 FOR
Select ...
commit;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
err_msg := SQLERRM;
dbms_output.put_line (err_msg);
ROLLBACK;
END;
If I only run select .. in DBArtisan, it display all 2030,000 rows in 3:44 minutes
2) But when call stored procedure, it will take 80-100 minutes .
3) The stored procedure is translated from sybase using migration tools, it's very simple, in sybase it just
CREATE PROCEDURE X_OWNER.DISPLAY_ADDRESS
AS
BEGIN
select ..
The select part is exact same.
4) The perl code is almost exact same, except the query sql:
sybase verson: my $sql ="exec DISPLAY_ADDRESS";
and no need bind the cursor parameter.
This is batch job, we create a file with all information, and ftp to clients everynight.
Thanks!
Rulin

Similar Messages

  • Getting result set from stored procedures in database controls in weblogic

    I am calling a stored procedure from database control which actually returns a result set
    when i call the stored procedure like
    * @jc:sql statement="call PROC4()"
    ResultSet sampleProc() throws SQLException;
    it gives me exception saying
    "weblogic.jws.control.ControlException: Method sampleProc is DML but does not return void or int"
    I would appreciate any help
    Thanks,
    Uma

    Thanks for you reply!
    1) The stored procedure has head
    CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE X_OWNER.DISPLAY_ADDRESS
    cv_1 IN OUT SYS_REFCURSOR
    AS
    err_msg VARCHAR2(100);
    BEGIN
    --Adaptive Server has expanded all '*' elements in the following statement
    OPEN cv_1 FOR
    Select ...
    commit;
    EXCEPTION
    WHEN OTHERS THEN
    err_msg := SQLERRM;
    dbms_output.put_line (err_msg);
    ROLLBACK;
    END;
    If I only run select .. in DBArtisan, it display all 2030,000 rows in 3:44 minutes
    2) But when call stored procedure, it will take 80-100 minutes .
    3) The stored procedure is translated from sybase using migration tools, it's very simple, in sybase it just
    CREATE PROCEDURE X_OWNER.DISPLAY_ADDRESS
    AS
    BEGIN
    select ..
    The select part is exact same.
    4) The perl code is almost exact same, except the query sql:
    sybase verson: my $sql ="exec DISPLAY_ADDRESS";
    and no need bind the cursor parameter.
    This is batch job, we create a file with all information, and ftp to clients everynight.
    Thanks!
    Rulin

  • Multiple result sets from stored procedure into CachedRowSet

    How can you obtain multiple sets of data from a stored procedure that returns multiple result sets, when you'd like to use CachedRowSet rather than ResultSet?
    My database's stored procedures return multiple result sets, but I'm not sure how to manipulate that using CallableStatements and CachedRowSets... I read the RowSet tutorial from java.sun.com but that didn't cover the case of multiple result sets and CallablStatements.
    How might I do this? Thanks a lot.

    SELECT columns..
    FROM table
    FOR XML PATH('NodeName'),('Rootname')
    Thank you for replying.
    I dont have to generate XML from a query. I have to generate from a SP and that too without modifying it.
    Thanks,
    Tauhid
    thats ok you can do like this
    1. Create a table with structure same as SP resultset
    2. Populate table with SP result as per below
    INSERT table
    EXEC SPName param1value,...
    3. Add a query like below
    SELECT columns..
    FROM tablename
    FOR XML PATH('NodeName'),('RootName')
    see
    http://visakhm.blogspot.com/2014/05/t-sql-tips-fun-with-for-xml-path.html
    4. Use sp_send_dbmail to sent it through mail
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-IN/library/ms190307.aspx
    Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

  • Result Sets and Stored Procedure

    In advance one question in general - since I never know: What actually is a result set???
    Is it a cursor with a direct connection to the server-side database-data ? Or is it just a copy of the results once "loaded" by the query and delivered by the Server to the client ???
    Second: I have a Stored Procedure on a MS SQL Server 2000
    I try to call the stored procedure via jdbc. The last query in the Stored Proc is a query relying on local temporary tables. If I execute the stored procedure by my java-class, i get a
    java.sql.SQLException: [Microsoft][SQLServer JDBC Driver]No ResultSet set was produced.
    The usual "Select, Update and Insert-stuff" works fine with JDBC.
    Stored Procedures WITHOUT resultset work fine too.
    But this one just refuses to give me the results.
    Executing the same stored procedure in 'MS SQL-QUERYANALYZER' gives me my expected results.
    Any ideas?
    Sven

    In advance one question in general - since I never
    know: What actually is a result set???
    Is it a cursor with a direct connection to the
    server-side database-data ? Or is it just a copy of
    the results once "loaded" by the query and delivered
    by the Server to the client ???The first one, more or less. It relies on the connection to retrieve the results, .. if the connection is lost, so is the data in the ResultSet.
    Second: I have a Stored Procedure on a *MS SQL Server
    2000*
    I try to call the stored procedure via jdbc. The last
    query in the Stored Proc is a query relying on local
    temporary tables. If I execute the stored procedure by
    my java-class, i get a
    java.sql.SQLException: [Microsoft][SQLServer JDBC
    Driver]No ResultSet set was produced.Have you tried a basic stored procedure that should return a ResultSet?.. maybe one that doesn't rely on the temporary tables? You may want to also check with the support for the driver you're using since that's really where the ability to use stored procedures resides.

  • Ora-06550 returning data from Stored Procedure and Entity Data Model

    Hi.
    I'm creating an application that uses a WCF Service to return data. I also created a proyect with the EDMX design and mapped most of my DBModel to a classes context. I have added some of the procedures as well. One of them receive some parameters and return a Sys_RefCursor, that is populated according to the parameters.
    I have declared the "<add >" tags in the Web.Config and imported the function of the Procedure. When I call the Asyncronous function I get different exceptions:
    1. If I call the function, with all of the parameters i get:
    Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleException: ORA-06550: línea 1, columna 8:
    PLS-00306: número o tipos de argumentos erróneos al llamar a
    'SP_HECHOSJURITER'
    ORA-06550: línea 1, columna 8:
    (wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'SP_HECHOSJURITER')
    2. If i just set 1 parameter in the SP, returning the same type of data, I get:
    Error al recibir la respuesta HTTP a
    http://localhost/Procalculo.CGFM.SIGOC.DatosServices/ServiceDatos.svc.
    (failed to receive http response. error 12152)
    3. If I don't set any parameters in the procedure, it works fine, and return correct data.
    It exclusively happen with one entity.
    Any clue?
    I appreciate any help.

    When you return result sets from stored procedures to Entity Framework, you are very likely using implicit result sets. Implicit result sets don't need to be declared as a parameter in code, only in the <add> tags to define the metadata in the .NET config file.
    For example, in the EF Oracle By Example, you'll see that the stored procedure in the function import has three parameters, but only two are declared in the code. The third one was defined in the config file.
    http://download.oracle.com/oll/obe/EntityFrameworkOBE/EntityFrameworkOBE.htm

  • Which is more efficient way to get result set from database server

    Hi,
    I am working on a project where I require to query database to fetch result set and then iterate through the resultset. Now, What I want is that I want to create one single java code that would call many different SQLs and create a list out of resultset. There are two approaches for me.
    1.) To create a txt file where I can store my queries. My java program can read this file and get the appropriate query to be used.
    2.) To create a stored procedure containing the queries and call the stored procedure from my java program. Also, not that some of the queries needs to be created dynamically depending upon the parameteters supplied.
    Out of these two approches which is optimum and why?
    Also, following things to be noted.
    1. At times I want to create where clause of the query dynamically depenending upon the parameters passed.
    2. I want one single java file that will handle all database calls.
    3. Paramters to the stored procedure can be passed using array descriptor.
    4. Conneciton I am making using JNDI.
    Please do provide me optimum way of out these two. You may also suggest some other approaches, if any.
    Thanks,
    Rajan
    Edited by: RP on Jun 26, 2012 11:11 PM

    RP wrote:
    In case of queries stored in text files. I will require to replace some pre defined placeholder with actual parameters and then pass that modified query to db engine. Even I liked the second approach as it is more easily maintainable. There are a couple of issues. Shared SQL is one. Irrespective of the method used, the SQL cursor that is created needs to have bind variables. This ensures re-usability of the cursor. This reduces the risk of Shared Pool fragmentation. This lowers hard parsing and reduces CPU utilisation.
    Another issue is flexibility. If the SQL cursors are created by stored procedures, this code resides on the server and abstracts the Java client from the complexities of SQL and SQL performance. The code can easily be updated and fine tuned to deliver faster/better SQL cursors, or modified to take new Oracle features, changes in data model, and so on, into consideration. This stored proc can be updated without having to touch or recompile a single byte of Java client code.
    There's also the security issue. What is more secure? SQL encapsulated in stored procs in a secure database and server environment? Or SQL "encapsulated" in text files on the client?
    The less code you have running on the client, the less code you have running in the wild that can be compromised without having to first compromise the server.
    Only I was worried about any performace issue might happen using this approach. Performance is not a factor of who creates the SQL cursor.
    Whether Java client creates a SQL cursor, or a PL/SQL stored proc creates a SQL cursor, or a .Net client creates a SQL cursor - that SQL cursor does not know what the client is. It does not care what the client is. The SQL cursor performs as well as it is capable of.. given the execution plan, data volumes, server resources and speed/performance of the server.
    The client language and SQL cursor interface used by the client (there are several in PL/SQL), determines the performance of the client's interaction with the cursor (e.g. round trips to the database when interfacing with the cursor). The client language (and its client interface to the cursor) does not dictate the actual performance of that SQL cursor on the database (does not make joins faster, or I/O faster)
    One more question, Will my java program close the cursor that I opened in Procedure?That you need to ask your Java code. Java code leaking ref cursors are unfortunately all too common. You need to make sure that your Java client interface to SQL cursors, closes the cursor handle when done.

  • Can we pass temporary result set to the  procedure?

    Hi,
    The result set is stored in a temporary storage. Can we pass that resultset to the procedure?
    Thanks and regards
    Gowtham Sen.

    I'm still unclear just what this result set is... Is is a table or a cursor or something else?
    If you imply the physical result set of a SQL query, there is no such thing in Oracle. Oracle does not create and store a result set in memory containing the rows of the SQL SELECT. Creating such sets in memory does not scale. A single SELECT on such a database can kill the performance of the entire database by exhasuting all memory with a single large physical result set.
    Oracle "results" live in the database cache (residing in the SGA). Rows (as data blocks) are paged into and out of this case as demand dictates. When PL/SQL code, for example, fetches a row, the SQL engine grabs the row from the db cache (SGA) and copies it to the PGA (the private memory area of the PL/SQL process). The row also may not yet exist in the db cache - in which case it needs a physical read from disk to get the data block containing that row into the db cache (after which it is copied to the PGA).
    A PL/SQL process can do a bulk fetch - e.g. fetch a 100 rows from the SQL query/cursor at a time. In that case, a 100 rows are copied from the SGA db cache to the PGA.
    At no time is there are single large unique and dedicated memory struct in the SGA that contains the complete "result set" of a SQL query.
    Once you have fetched that row, that is it. Deal is done. You cannot reverse the cursor and fetch the row again. After you have fetched the last row in that cursor, you cannot pass that cursor to another process - the cursor is now empty. That other process cannot rewind the cursor and start fetching from the 1st row again. You will need to pass the SQL to that process in order for it to create its own cursor - also keeping in mind that in between the rows can have changed and that this other process could now see different results with its cursor.
    If you want to create such a physical temporary result set that is consistent and re-usable, you can use a temporary table - and insert the results of the SELECT into this temp table for further processing. This temp table is session specific and is auto destroyed when the session terminates.
    A comment though - it sounds like you're approaching the date warehouse processing (scrubbing, transformation and loading of data) as a row-by-row process.
    That is a flawed approach. Row-by-row processing does not scale. One should deal with data sets. Especially when the volumes are large. One should also attempt to perform minimal passes through a data set. Processing a bunch of rows, then passing that rows to another process to do some processing on the same rows.. this means multiple passes through the same data. That is very inefficient performance and resource wise.

  • How to get return values from stored procedure to ssis packge?

    Hi,
    I need returnn values from my stored procedure to ssis package -
    My procedure look like  and ssis package .Kindly help me to oget returnn value to my ssis package
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    -- =============================================
    -- Author: <Author,,Name>
    -- Create date: <Create Date,,>
    -- Description: <Description,,>
    -- =============================================
    ALTER PROCEDURE [TSC]
    -- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here
    @P_STAGE VARCHAR(2000)
    AS
    BEGIN
    -- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
    -- interfering with SELECT statements.
    SET NOCOUNT ON;
    -- Insert statements for procedure here
    --SELECT <@Param1, sysname, @p1>, <@Param2, sysname, @p2>
    truncate table [INPUTS];
    INSERT
    INTO
    [INPUTS_BASE]
    SELECT
    [COLUMN]
    FROM [INPUTS];
    RETURN
    END
    and i am trying to get the return value from execute sql task and shown below
    and i am taking my returnn value to result set variable

    You need to have either OUTPUT parameters or use RETURN statement to return a value in stored procedures. RETURN can only return integer values whereas OUTPUT parameters can be of any type
    First modify your procedure to define return value or OUTPUT parameter based on requirement
    for details see
    http://www.sqlteam.com/article/stored-procedures-returning-data
    Once that is done in SSIS call sp from Execute SQL Task and in parameter mapping tabe shown above add required parameters and map them to variables created in SSIS and select Direction as Output or Return Value based on what option you used in your
    procedure.
    Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

  • How to generate a report from stored procedure

    I would like to generate a report from stored procedure.
    I used to work on sql server. this can be done as easy as put a select statement at the end of stored procedure.
    The resule can be displayed on the development IDE, like sql developer or consume by Java JDBC client.
    is there equivalent way to do this in Oracle stored procedure?

    Hi,
    What type of report you are looking..for.. ??
    As you said that "I used to work on sql server. this can be done as easy as put a select statement at the end of stored procedure. "
    When you execute it will return the result set and you will display directly on the FrontEnd.. Is my Understanding is correct Up to here.
    See, In oracle you have call some custom stored procedures as you did in SQL Sever, but you have return the Results Sets, with help of Out put paramter, Either Cursors or Varrays..
    or Else you can generate the Html reports based on your requirement, HTML can be used in the stored procedures of Oracle which will generate for your, you need to code it.
    I could not able get the relevant link for your reference.
    I will get back to you on this.
    - Pavan Kumar N

  • Best method to transfer large strings (XML data) to/from stored procedure

    Hi!
    I'm trying to call a PL/SQL procedure from Java. The procedure inputs a string (XML) that is parsed, and returns a result string (also XML).
    Typical size of the string is 5kb -> 1mb.
    I can see two possible solutions:
    1) String / LONG
    2) CLOB (Using DMBS_LOB.createTemporary and getting a CLOB locator and passing the locator to the stored procedure)
    Does anyone have other suggestions?
    What is the fastest method for transferring XML structures from to and from stored procedures?
    Anders

    Anders,
    I would say it depends on your requirement. Both the methods have some advantages and disadvantages.
    Using a CLOB means that you have to use vendor specific libraries but this is more extendible and I fast too.
    Using String/Long will be more portable in the long run but again you lose on speed/performance.
    Just a doubt of mine... If I got it correct, you are transforming one XML to another XML based on some conditions. Why dont you use XSL and XSL StyleSheet Processor packaged with XDK for this? I think this would be the fastest way.
    Hope this helps.

  • URGENT : Return Bulk data from Stored Procedure

    Hi,
    Tell me, how do I return a bulk of data which
    does not exist in the data base
    but is concluded while the Stored Procedure is executed
    from the Stored procedure
    to the C++ program.
    For Example:
    Table ABC
    Field1 Field2 Field3
    A 1 3
    B 1 5
    C 2 10
    Table DEF
    Field1 Field2 Field3
    D 10 24
    E 3 16
    F 8 19
    SP_TESTING
    Depending on the values in both the tables
    for some range of conditions,
    a conclusion X is derived for each range value of the
    condition range.
    Now I need to return this bulk of data X with the
    condition they belong to
    back to the C++ code calling it....
    NOTE : A stored procedure is requited as there is a lot
    of processing
    required before we conclude the result X for each value
    in the condition range.
    If I execute this code from C++ instead of Stored
    procedure
    it is very slow and speed is a prime requirement of my
    system.
    Also i'm not using any MFC class to access database.
    I'm using ConnectionPtr, RecordsetPtr and _CommandPtr
    from msado15.dll for database access...
    One solution to this could be use of Temp tables.
    As this process is used by a lot of different stored
    procedures having a common
    temp table to all will need something like 50 NUMERIC
    fields, 50 VARCHAR fields
    and so on, which doesn't seem like a very good solution
    to this problem.
    Sounds like something I would have done while in school,
    implement a dumb solution.
    So, please suggest me a solution as to how do I return
    bulk data in the form
    of recordsets from stored procedure.
    Regards
    Shruti

    Use Out parameter mode
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE procedure a1 (x  OUT NUMBER, y  OUT NUMBER) AS
      2  BEGIN
      3        x:= 1;
      4        y:= 2;
      5  END;
      6  .
    SQL> /
    Procedure created.
    SQL> SET SERVEROUTPUT ON
    SQL> DECLARE
      2   a NUMBER :=3;
      3   b NUMBER :=4;
      4  BEGIN
      5   a1 (a,b);
      6      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE( 'a = ' || a );
      7      dbms_output.put_line( 'b = ' || b );
      8  END;
      9  .
    SQL> /
    a = 1
    b = 2
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.By default parameters are copied to the OUT parameter mode .
    COPY hint in PLSQL don’t send a pointer to calling program unit but NOCOPY
    does.
    Khurram

  • Writing from Stored Procedure directly into a file...

    Hi guys,
    I would like to write the results of a stored procedure into a file. Indeed, I am calling a Stored Procedure from a script and I would like to write the result of that procedure to a file and not a table.
    Thanks guys,
    Pipoca

    Hi,
    The UTL would be nice, but since I am calling the procedure from a unix script and *I wanted to keep the file in the unix machine* I don't believe this is the solution.UTL_FILE - will refers to a directory - which resides on Server - I Hope your DB is placed on Unix and you script is exeucted from their only. Then obviously your resulted file and source exits on unix machine only.
    HTH
    - Pavan Kumar N
    OCP- Oracle 9i/10g
    http://oracleinternals.blogspot.com

  • Return a record set from a procedure

    I am building an application for my company.
    Before oracle I had used MS SQL Server for a long time.
    I build a procedure as following
    CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE YBP.ReturnSet
    -- Return a record set from a procedure
    IS
    BEGIN
    SELECT * FROM fdbase;
    END;
    But the complier show me a error message:
    <font color="#0000FF">PLS-00428     an INTO clause is expected in this SELECT statement</font>
    I read the error details
    <font color="#0000FF">"In PL/SQL, only a subquery is written without an INTO clause."</font>
    But I know that this procedure can run well in <font color="#0000FF">MS SQL Server .</font>
    How I can do this thing in Oracle
    Any help will be appreciate!

    I have a stored proc that is defined as
    CREATE or REPLACE
    PROCEDURE ABC
    (linkid IN CHAR,
    Year_in IN DATE,
    Method_in IN CHAR,
    Date_out OUT DATE,
    average_out OUT NUMBER)
    is
    begin
    .. Date_out := ...;
    average_out := ...;
    end;
    another partially completed stored proc that returns a ref
    cursor defined as follows:
    create or replace package zzz
    as
    type cursorType is ref cursor;
    end;
    create or replace function test return zzz.cursortype
    as
    date_OUT date;
    Average_OUT number;
    l_cursor zzz.cursorType;
    CURSOR temp_cur is
    SELECT l.linkid, L.routenumber, ABC(l.linkid,
    to_date('01/01/2000', 'mm/dd/yyyy'),
    '2',
    date_OUT,
    average_OUT)
    FROM LINK l
    WHERE l.LINKID <= '010999';
    begin
    open temp_cur;
    end;
    inside test (which I need help completing), how can I refer to
    the date_out and the average_out params returned by ABC() so
    that these values are in turn passed to the cursortype defined
    in package zzz?
    Thanks in advance.

  • Returning SQL cursor from Stored Procedure

    Hi,
    I have a query regarding returning sql cursor from stored procedure to java in oracle 11g.
    I want to query some data ex: my query returns A, B, C. Also, now I want to query some other data ex: D, E, F. Now I want to return this data as an sql cursor as a single row . Example: A,B,C,D,E,F. Is it possible to return/create a cursor in stored procedure?
    assume both query returns equal number of rows.. however both are not related to each other..

    RP wrote:
    Hi,
    I have a query regarding returning sql cursor from stored procedure to java in oracle 11g.
    I want to query some data ex: my query returns A, B, C. Also, now I want to query some other data ex: D, E, F. Now I want to return this data as an sql cursor as a single row . Example: A,B,C,D,E,F. Is it possible to return/create a cursor in stored procedure?
    assume both query returns equal number of rows.. however both are not related to each other..It sounds like what you need is a ref cursor.
    First thing to remember though is that cursors do not hold any data (see: {thread:id=886365})
    In it's simplest form you would be creating a procedure along these lines...
    SQL> create or replace procedure get_data(p_sql in varchar2, p_rc out sys_refcursor) is
      2  begin
      3    open p_rc for p_sql;
      4  end;
      5  /
    Procedure created.
    SQL> var rc refcursor;
    SQL> exec get_data('select empno, ename, deptno from emp', :rc);
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> print rc;
         EMPNO ENAME          DEPTNO
          7369 SMITH              20
          7499 ALLEN              30
          7521 WARD               30
          7566 JONES              20
          7654 MARTIN             30
          7698 BLAKE              30
          7782 CLARK              10
          7788 SCOTT              20
          7839 KING               10
          7844 TURNER             30
          7876 ADAMS              20
          7900 JAMES              30
          7902 FORD               20
          7934 MILLER             10
    14 rows selected.
    SQL> exec get_data('select deptno, dname from dept', :rc);
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> print rc
        DEPTNO DNAME
            10 ACCOUNTING
            20 RESEARCH
            30 SALES
            40 OPERATIONS
            50 IT SUPPORTWhich takes an SQL statement (as you said that both your queries were unrelated), and returns a ref cursor, and then your Java code would fetch the data using that cursor.
    Now, as for getting your rows to columns and combining two queries that do that... something along these lines...
    SQL> select * from x;
    C
    A
    B
    C
    SQL> select * from y;
    C
    D
    E
    F
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  select x.col1, x.col2, x.col3
      2        ,y.col1 as col4
      3        ,y.col2 as col5
      4        ,y.col3 as col6
      5  from (
      6        select max(decode(rn,1,col1)) as col1
      7              ,max(decode(rn,2,col1)) as col2
      8              ,max(decode(rn,3,col1)) as col3
      9        from (select col1, rownum rn from (select * from x order by col1))
    10       ) x
    11  cross join
    12       (
    13        select max(decode(rn,1,col1)) as col1
    14              ,max(decode(rn,2,col1)) as col2
    15              ,max(decode(rn,3,col1)) as col3
    16        from (select col1, rownum rn from (select * from y order by col1))
    17*      ) y
    SQL> /
    C C C C C C
    A B C D E F... will do what you ask. For further information about turning rows to columns read the FAQ: {message:id=9360005}

  • Need help in restricting a result set from a UNION in MERGE

    Hello,
    Would really appreciate if anybody could help me out with the issue I am facing with the below statements (I am new to Oracle ):
    merge into table_name_1 p
    using
      select p_key, value_1, value_2
      from some_tables
      UNION
      select p_key, value_1, value_2
      from some_tables
      UNION
    )t
    on (p.p_key = t.p_key)
    when matched then
      update table_name_1 with value_1 and value_2
    when not matched then
      insert table_name_1 with p_key, value_1, value_2;
    Now, the union of all those selects gives me distinct values and it works most of the times but when I get values like below, the merge fails:
    p_key-----value_1-----value_2
    100-----25-----50
    100-----NULL-----50
    I browsed the net and understood the reason behind this: the result set becomes ambiguous and merge doesn't know which row to insert first and which one to update.
    Now, my requirement is: I could have any of the below scenario/result sets from the union and I need only 1 row per p_key -
    result_set_1
    p_key-----value_1-----value_2
    100-----25-----50 ***************need this row
    100-----NULL-----50
    100-----NULL-----NULL
    result_set_2
    p_key-----value_1-----value_2
    100-----25-----NULL ***************need this row
    100-----NULL-----NULL
    result_set_3
    p_key-----value_1-----value_2
    100-----25-----NULL ***************need this row (p_key = 100)
    100-----NULL-----NULL
    200-----NULL-----75 ***************need this row (p_key = 200)
    200-----NULL-----NULL
    300-----90-----95 ***************need this row (p_key = 300)
    So, I basically need a way to restrict the values that I will get from the UNION of all those selects to fit the requirement above, hope I was able to explain the issue I am facing.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Dpunk

    In all cases the goal is to find an order by value that will make the row you want be first.
    The query I gave is calculating a priority for each row by adding up values showing whether each column is null or not null. The case statements check whether each column is null and need to be added up to give a total priority value.
    Value_1   Value_2   Priority
    Not Null  Not Null  2 + 1 = 3
    Not Null  Null      2 + 0 = 2
    Null      Not Null  0 + 1 = 1
    Null      Null      0 + 0 = 0
    The priority value ends up being a bitmap showing whether each value is null or not null. I think that reflects my mathematics background.
    Another way of getting the same result (suggested to me by your asking why it needs the "+") would be to use two CASE expressions as separate order by items:
    select p_key, value_1, value_2 from
    (select p_key, value_1, value_2, row_number() over
              (partition by p_key
               order by case when value_1 is null then 0 else 1 end DESC,
                        case when value_2 is null then 0 else 1 end DESC
              ) as rn
      from (your UNION query here)
    where rn = 1
    A third way is to use a more complex case statement:
    select p_key, value_1, value_2 from
    (select p_key, value_1, value_2, row_number() over
              (partition by p_key
               order by case when value_1 is NOT null and value_2 is NOT null then 1
                             when value_1 is NOT null and value_2 is     null then 2
                             when value_1 is     null and value_2 is NOT null then 3
                             when value_1 is     null and value_2 is     null then 4
                         end  ASC
              ) as rn
      from (your UNION query here)
    where rn = 1

Maybe you are looking for

  • 3G not working on IPad.

    3g not working on my ipad. I used a different operator. MTS, Beeline - Russians operators. Wind used in Greece. In all cases the same. 3G works for some time after switching on sellular. Then disappears. At best, then running EDGE. It is very slow. L

  • I have not received the verification email for my Apple ID watting frm last 4 days

    I have not received the verification email for my Apple ID watting frm last 4 days

  • PO Release Strategy for 3 company codes

    Hi I am working on PO release procedure for 3 company codes in a client.I have created a one charecteristics called Order Type & assigned to class -POVALUE_NEW .I am using the same charecteristics & class in 3 company codes. I have created a differen

  • Is 8 gb of RAM safe to install in my early 2008 MacBook Pro? Apple says 4 gb is the maximum.

    Apple says that my early 2008 MacBook Pro can only have a maximum of 4 gb of RAM. Has anybody tried adding more than the recommended max? I have heard people say 8 gb is ok but wanted to know if anybody has actually done this. I run parallels desktop

  • Best Cluster Size for RAID 0

    Hi all, When I get my replacement SATA HDD back I will be creating another RAID 0 array.  My Windows XP cluster size is 4K, but I have a choice when I am creating my RAID array.  All hardware in Sig. The system is being used mainly as a gaming machin