Plan data missing in KE30

Dear all,
I have problem.
I complete planning the copa planning via tcode KEPM, record type B. Posting has number document and exist as table CE2XXXX.
I continues creating COPA report make comparison between actual and plan. I create starting with form and assigned to report. However, report contained no data for plan column. I can identified the problem because version can not work in form. If i generate the report without form (basic type), plan report could be generated.
Please any advice, why plan data with form could be missing in report KE30.
Thanks in advance,
DEwi

Hi,
if the same plan data can be seen in "basic report" but not in a report based on a form, its definitely the form that causes the problem. Check the form, or ask somebody who is able to do so, maybe there is a mistake in the definition that you are not able to view...
Best regards, Christian

Similar Messages

Report painter - library 0FL - plan data missing

Hi
In ECC6 using the new library 0FL (new general ledger) I am unable to obtain results for plan data.
This is a basic reprot with restrictions for profit center and cost center.
Any suggestions, appreciated
thks
MW

Im also experiencing the same problem. No plan data in plan column, however I am getting actual data. Anyone have a solution or suggestion?

COPA planning - no plan data visible in KE30

Hi all ,
I have a issue with the planning in COPA.
I did the planning and upload from excel , but I'm not able to see what I planned in the KE30 report / plan column.
in the planning package the selection is :
- controlling area : "X"
- company code : "X"
- period / year : from 001.2006 to 012.2006
- posting type : F
- version : 0
in the KE30 report form / plan column the selection is :
- plan/act indic. : 1
- version : 0
- fiscal year : variable (same as in actual column where the data exist)
- period : variable (same as in actual column where the data exist)
The issue is that even I planned and I can see the plan document in the line Items , it is not visible in the KE30 report.
thx,
Mihaela K

Hi Mihaela
If you are sure that Plan Line Items are posted, then there is an issue with your report definition...
First, check CE2XXXX table or KE25 report.. If you see line items there, then check the steps below
1. Go to KE35 and check your form
2. Check what is the Plan/Actual Indicator that you selected... for Plan you should select "1".
Regards
Ajay M

In Report output, Missing Plan data with the Seletion option - Single Value input (more than 10 values)

Hi ,
I am running the Query (Actual Vs Plan) in the BEx Analyzer, with the input for the characteristic like Fiscal Year, Posting Period and Cost Center(20 Single value) it not comming up with the plan data - Actual data is coming up fine.
If i gave 10 or less than 10 inputs ( single values input in the selection - option ) for the characteristic COST CENTER it coming up with all the data (Both plan and Actual). if the COST CENTER input values more than 10, it not coming up plan data (Actual data is coming)
Cost Center Variable is designed with an Authorization Variable.
Can any one please help me to know why plan data is getting miss when the input limit more than 10 (single values input in the selection - option) in the Cost Center Variable?
An also could you please share that, What is the Max limit for the Single values and Range Value for an Selection - option in the BEx Variable.

A)    Hi ,
             In Report, I am having 2 variant.
1.   For one variant, i have saved the input values for both the Select Single values & Select range for the cost center.
8 Values in single & 4 Values in Ranges
It coming up with data successfully.
2.    Another variant having input only for select single values for the COST CENTER, it contains 20 records (This variant also have restricted with the same values as above variant for COSTCENTER variable)
Fiscal year                         : 2012
Posting period                   : 8
Cost Center                        : 20 values in Single                                             (Here I have separated the range values into single)
It’s not coming up with plan data.
B)   If I gave only first 10 values in the Single value, Output for both actual and Plan are coming up…………. If I gave the Second 10 value in the Single value and got the Output for both actual and Plan.
C)    I have also checked the following details of this query,
Executed the query in RSECADMIN and checked the Authorization log as below,
Relevant Characteristics for Detailed Authorization Check (Characteristics with Full Authorization Are Not Listed!)
List of Effective Authorization-Relevant Characteristics for InfoProvider ZPCA_M36:
List Is Empty:
There Are No Characteristics That Have to Be Checked in Detail
          2. Checked the Single value input by iteration, 1 to 10, it retrieves data. More than 10 like 11, 12 … is getting failed to pull plan data.
          3. checked the selection Value range by iteration and I gave the range value count up to 25        inputs, its works fine.
Thanks.
Regards,
Subashini.

How to- Log Changes in Plan Data Using Datastore Object

Hi,
I followed the u201CHow tou2026 Log Changes in Plan Data Using Datastore Objectu201D in order to trace the changes made in Planning.
Although it is working fine, Iu2019m only being able to write the changes made by users that have SAP_ALL.
Do you know what kind of authorization is missing on other users?
Best regards,
João Arvanas

Hello João
I would recommend you to use the authorization logn on RSECADMIN to
trace what is the authorization missing for the user who you are using.
Also you can try to set break-points on the introduced code and check
where the issue is raised and check that is the authorization system is
looking for.
Let me know if this helps, otherwise I will give you other updates.
Also you may post here what is the error that you are getting. That can
help us to giving more specific answers.
Best regards
Lucimar

Plan Data Does Not Show in FI Report

I am using 6.0 with New GL and Functional Area standard Report S_PL0_86000029. I added cost center plan data using KP06 and that info shows fine in std report for cost centers (S_ALR_87013611), but does not appear in the aforementioned FI based report. Is there some transfer transaction I am missing?
Thanks
David

I resolved my problem by creating a new GRR1 report using the New GL (FAGLFLEXT) table. This report brings in all of the primary cost element postings as well as the secondary overhead postings. This provides a much more holistic view of FICO reporting. I used Functional Areas in order to break out the income statement into typical sections, including one for Net Order Consumption. This special section for orders should be zero if everything is settled to either WIP or variances. Otherwise I see a order related settlement problem on the face of the income statement. I found there was a slight problem with the secondary postings between the cost center and order. I used substitution rules to force the order postings to have one functional area while the cost centers provided the other side.
Once I haad the actual postings working, the next problem was that no plan data was coming to the report. I had to work through many details to finally get the plan data to come through, but now it works as designed.
Juggler

Error " Data missing for the entry check while creating a new waste code

Hi all, While setting a new Waste code I get the error " Data missing for the entry check, correction:". while filling the NAM- WASTECOCAT - LER item.
This sould look for the catalog's name included in the phrase set but for some reason it doesn't find it giving me this error.
I am changing original Characteristics, phrase set, classes, and value assignment type. Just to have my own estructure with Znames for all of them.
I have also change the enviroment parameter "WAM_PHRSET_WACATLG" with the name of my phrase set.
I have checked everything several times watching for typos or looking for a missing step.
I have even tried including my new Z's characteristics in the classe and living the original SAP_EHS_1024_001_WASTE_CATALOG. (changing the enviroment parameter WAM_PHRSET_WACATLG to SAP_EHS_1024_001_WASTE_CATALOG) and it works.
I will like to change this characteristic by Z_EHS_WA_WASTE_CATALOG
Phrase set to Z_EHS_WA_WASTE_CATALOG.
enviroment parameter WAM_PHRSET_WACATLG= Z_EHS_WA_WASTE_CATALOG
After matching up the master data It should work fine but I might be missing something to get it running ok.
¿Any idea?
Regards,
Alvaro

Hello Juan Carlos, the value and class that I want to duplicate and doesn't work is for Waste Code, I have also duplicated the one you have displayed (waste pproperties) without any problem.
1.I have duplicated and changed class SAP_EHS_1024_001. to Z_EHS_WA
2. Create a copy of the 5 characteristics included in this class.
SAP_EHS_1024_001_WASTE_CATALOG
SAP_EHS_1024_001_WASTE_CODE
SAP_EHS_1024_001_WA_SUBCATEG
SAP_EHS_1024_001_WA_CATEGORY
SAP_EHS_1024_001_REMARK
change the name by
Z_EHS_WA_WASTE_CATALOG
Z_EHS_WA_WASTE_CODE
Z_EHS_WA_SUBCATEG
Z_EHS_WA_CATEGORY
Z_EHS_WA_REMARK.
I checked the funcion C14K_WASTECATLG_CHECK is in the value of the Z_EHS_WA_WASTE_CODE characteristic
I checked the funcion C14K_WASTECODE_CHECK is in the value of the Z_EHS_WA_WASTE_CATALOG characteristic
3. Create phrase sets for each new category. with same name.
4. Match up the master data.
5. Change the enviroment parameter.to Z_EHS_WA_WASTE_CATALOG
I think I have followed all the steps, but for some reason it doesn't find the catalog
The phrase for the catalog is EWC in english and LER in spanish.
Regards
Alvaro.

Backup scenarios for plan data : DTP to be used ?

Hi,
I have a planning cube to which i have a back up cube, which is a standard cube, and have a one to one transformation between both of them. My scenario is that i want to take a back up of the plan data into this standard cube. Initially i want to take 3 years of plan data and then i would take a weekly backup of the data.My requirement is that once i take a back up of the data, that particular data has to be deleted from the planning cube.

Hi,
you can do the following.
1. backup the data using a transformation
2. write a planning function/sequence which sets all keyfigures of the backup-ed data to zero (in your planning cube).
3. Compress the planning cube.
If you use the variables in the filter in step 1 and 2 this should be safe. If you want this can even be executed in one process chain.
Hope this helps
Regard Matthias Nutt

0vtype =20 (plan data) not populating to cube but present in psa

Hello Experts,
I have a requirement in BW 3.5 where in I need to create a report on multiprovider which should give the actual data,plan data and the difference between actual and plan data for some key figures.
The data flow is like this
There are two cubes one for actual and the other for plan ,I am able to get the actual data (10) for actual cube from R/3 .
But the problem is with plan cube,I am not able to get the plan data (20) to the plan cube (to the field 0vtype) ,but the data is coming till psa from R/3,there is no routine present in update rule also,but still data is not showing up for this 0vtype in plan cube...
I have tried loading selectively (020) by giving 020 as constant in the update rule..but still no luck
The datasource that is fetching plan data is 1_CO_PA_PLN1000.
Could you please suggest how to proceed further
Thanks,

HI Sashi,
Checking the mapping between the 0vtype and the source fiedls.
Check in transfer rules first if it is mapped or not.
Transfer rules are not mapped to source fields then correct it .
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Reddy

Regarding planning data not available in reports

HI SdN,
In my reports I'm populating actual data and planning data.But as of now we have only actual data display's in our report.what we are doing is we are populating data in BW and analysing on the base of the product cutomer (compounded) combination which is coming from r/3.(groups and sub-groups which we are entering at r/3 )
So our report shows us on the base of groups and sub groups which we are entering at r/3 level.That all is working fine but our customer wants that planning data is also displays in the reports as of now it is showing not assigned values in report.
so my question is ,To display planning data for group and sub groups provided by r/3 on the basis of product and customer (though other reports are showing planning data) , I know that I need to include this compounded infoobject in bps cubes but shall I also need to consider this in the BPS functions?I'm confused here and not sure about this.
And is that mandatory to have that componded infoobject mapped from underlying ods for customer.Because as of now planning cube is only updated with BPS functions?
Could you pls advice?
R

Hi Rubane
If the actuals and planning data are in seperate cubes then you will need to create a multi over both cubes to report on them together. However your BPS planning must be done against the same infoobject for you to be able to report on them together. If you are planning against the same IO the groupings from R3 will apply.
Also include the infoobject 0REQUID as a characteristic restriction and restrict it to variable 0S_RQMRC (Most Current Data)
Josh

After closing request plan data are not longer displayed

Hello all,
guess it's a standard problem but can't find a solution in the forum.
Scenario:
I created a planning cube and an aggregation level with two key figures, a workbook
based on the planning cube and a cube with actual data. The workbook showed the
the actual data and the so far entered plan data, so everything worked fine, but after closing the request
in the plan cube manually by switching to loading and back, the workbook doesn't show the plan data anymore.
Planning is not finished, so its necessary to see the already planned values.
Thanks
jg

Hi,
I think this is an inconsistency of the OLAP cache used in the plan buffer. Clear the cache of the plan buffer query via RSRT or RSR_CACHE. The plan buffer query has the following technical name
- IC/!!1IC if the input ready query is defined on an aggregation level on the InfoCube or on a multiprovder that contains an aggregation level as partprovider that is defined on InfoCube IC
- MPRO/!!1MPRO if the input ready query is defined on an aggregation level on the multiprovider MPRO
For a final solution earch for notes in the area of OLAP and OLAP cache in connection with planning.
Regards
Gregor

Problem with Exception Worksheet using Data from Supply Plan Data Table

I added a series for a flag that indicates whether product is sourced from multiple manufacturing sites for a given customer and item. The flag is on the supply plan data table because it depends on the scenario. I created an exception worksheet for when the flag is set but all combinations are being displayed. If the flag is not set for a given combo then "Selected Page Item has No Data" is displayed in place of the table. I want only the combinations that meet the exception to be shown. I tried setting up an exception worksheet for customer shipments which is also on the supply plan data table but saw the same issue with all combinations being displayed whether or not the condition is met. Does anyone know of any issues with using exception worksheets with the supply plan data table? I searched the documentation and saw that exceptions behave differently with promotion series but this isn't a promotion.
I'm using Demantra version 7.2. Thanks for any help!
Edited by: user9253208 on Mar 30, 2010 6:40 AM

Thanks. We have come up with a workaround. While the combinations on the left are not affected by the exception, the data in the main table is so we moved as many levels as possible into the table. The performance is slow but the data is more useful, especially when exported into Excel. I was hoping for a better solution but I guess we'll just have to stick with what we've come up with.

After 10gto11g upgd, 'Planning Data Pull Worker' perf is very slow

Hi all,
We upgraded database from 10g to 11gR2. We have 3 prod instances , they work together. They are ebiz, planning, and configurator. Some of you might be familiar with this kind of setup.
We are running 'Planning Data Pull Worker' in APS instance (planning) instance. This program "SELECTs" (and gets data) from EBIZ instance and "INSERTS" into planning instance.
But after upgrade, this works fine in one instance (PERF6) (half hr), and takes very long like 6+ hrs in another instacen ARCH6.
We figured where the problem is. A select statement.
"select count(1) from apps.MRP_AP3_SALES_ORDERS_V ;"
Eventhough this is not exactly the select been used. We simplified by just trying "count(1)" of the main view which as the culprit.
I am pasting trace of both instance where working fine (PERF6) and where it is taking too long (ARCH6).
Please have a look and help. We opened a sev-1 tar as well , still problem persists.
Thanks,
Gopal

=======================================
___PERF6 instance trace; Where it works fine._
=======================================
SQL> SELECT * FROM table(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_AWR(('87dtkqstb5adq'),'961766442',null,'ADVANCED'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID 87dtkqstb5adq
select count(1) from apps.MRP_AP3_SALES_ORDERS_V
Plan hash value: 961766442
| Id | Operation | Name | Row
s | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | |
| | 29253 (100)| |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | |
1 | 189 | | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
1 | 189 | 29253 (1)| 00:05:52 |
| 3 | HASH JOIN | |
1 | 185 | 29253 (1)| 00:05:52 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | |
1 | 176 | 29246 (1)| 00:05:51 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | |
1 | 170 | 29245 (1)| 00:05:51 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | |
1 | 161 | 29245 (1)| 00:05:51 |
| 7 | HASH JOIN | | 60
90 | 654K| 19090 (1)| 00:03:50 |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | FND_LANGUAGES |
20 | 100 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | FND_LANGUAGES_N1 |
20 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 10 | HASH JOIN | | 62
46 | 640K| 19088 (1)| 00:03:50 |
| 11 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | OE_TRANSACTION_TYPES_TL | 12
97 | 37613 | 10 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | |
| | | |
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS | | 41
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
03 | 304K| 19077 (1)| 00:03:49 |
| 14 | NESTED LOOPS | | 41
03 | 220K| 14517 (1)| 00:02:55 |
| 15 | HASH JOIN | | 41
00 | 104K| 9959 (1)| 00:02:00 |
| 16 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | MRP_DERIVED_SO_DEMANDS | 41
00 | 65600 | 17 (0)| 00:00:01 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 17 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | MTL_SYS_ITEMS_SN_N2 | 15
59K| 14M| 1184 (1)| 00:00:15 |
| 18 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OE_ORDER_LINES_ALL |
1 | 29 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | OE_ORDER_LINES_U1 |
1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | OE_ORDER_HEADERS_U1 |
1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 21 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL |
1 | 21 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_SALES_ORDERS |
1 | 51 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 23 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | MTL_SALES_ORDERS_N1 |
1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 24 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PJM_PROJECT_PARAMETERS_U1 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
1 | 9 | 0 (0)| |
| 25 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OE_ODR_LINES_SN_N2 |
1 | 6 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AR_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS_ALL |
43 | 387 | 6 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 27 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2 |
1 | 4 | 0 (0)| |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id):
1 - SEL$15993197
8 - SEL$15993197 / FNL@SEL$2
9 - SEL$15993197 / FNL@SEL$2
11 - SEL$15993197 / OTTL@SEL$2
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
16 - SEL$15993197 / MDSD@SEL$2
17 - SEL$15993197 / MSIK@SEL$2
18 - SEL$15993197 / OOL@SEL$2
19 - SEL$15993197 / OOL@SEL$2
20 - SEL$15993197 / OOHA@SEL$2
21 - SEL$15993197 / OOHA@SEL$2
22 - SEL$15993197 / MSO@SEL$2
23 - SEL$15993197 / MSO@SEL$2
24 - SEL$15993197 / MPP@SEL$2
25 - SEL$15993197 / OOL1@SEL$2
26 - SEL$15993197 / ASPA@SEL$2
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
27 - SEL$15993197 / GSB@SEL$2
Outline Data
/*+
BEGIN_OUTLINE_DATA
IGNORE_OPTIM_EMBEDDED_HINTS
OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE('11.2.0.2')
DB_VERSION('11.2.0.2')
OPT_PARAM('optimizer_dynamic_sampling' 6)
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
ALL_ROWS
OUTLINE_LEAF(@"SEL$15993197")
ELIMINATE_JOIN(@"SEL$5C160134" "MTL_SALES_ORDERS"@"SEL$3")
OUTLINE(@"SEL$5C160134")
MERGE(@"SEL$335DD26A")
OUTLINE(@"SEL$1")
OUTLINE(@"SEL$335DD26A")
MERGE(@"SEL$3")
OUTLINE(@"SEL$2")
OUTLINE(@"SEL$3")
INDEX_FFS(@"SEL$15993197" "MSIK"@"SEL$2" ("MRP_SN_SYS_ITEMS"."INVENTORY_IT
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
EM_ID"
"MRP_SN_SYS_ITEMS"."ORGANIZATION_ID"))
FULL(@"SEL$15993197" "MDSD"@"SEL$2")
INDEX_RS_ASC(@"SEL$15993197" "OOL"@"SEL$2" ("OE_ORDER_LINES_ALL"."LINE_ID"
INDEX(@"SEL$15993197" "OOHA"@"SEL$2" ("OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL"."HEADER_ID"))
FULL(@"SEL$15993197" "OTTL"@"SEL$2")
INDEX_RS_ASC(@"SEL$15993197" "FNL"@"SEL$2" ("FND_LANGUAGES"."INSTALLED_FLA
G"))
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
INDEX_RS_ASC(@"SEL$15993197" "MSO"@"SEL$2" ("MTL_SALES_ORDERS"."SEGMENT1")
INDEX(@"SEL$15993197" "MPP"@"SEL$2" ("PJM_PROJECT_PARAMETERS"."PROJECT_ID"
"PJM_PROJECT_PARAMETERS"."ORGANIZATION_ID"))
INDEX(@"SEL$15993197" "OOL1"@"SEL$2" ("MRP_SN_ODR_LINES"."LINE_ID"))
FULL(@"SEL$15993197" "ASPA"@"SEL$2")
INDEX(@"SEL$15993197" "GSB"@"SEL$2" ("GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS"."SET_OF_BOOKS_ID")
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
LEADING(@"SEL$15993197" "MSIK"@"SEL$2" "MDSD"@"SEL$2" "OOL"@"SEL$2" "OOHA"
@"SEL$2" "OTTL"@"SEL$2"
"FNL"@"SEL$2" "MSO"@"SEL$2" "MPP"@"SEL$2" "OOL1"@"SEL$2" "ASPA"@"S
EL$2" "GSB"@"SEL$2")
USE_HASH(@"SEL$15993197" "MDSD"@"SEL$2")
USE_NL(@"SEL$15993197" "OOL"@"SEL$2")
USE_NL(@"SEL$15993197" "OOHA"@"SEL$2")
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
NLJ_BATCHING(@"SEL$15993197" "OOHA"@"SEL$2")
USE_HASH(@"SEL$15993197" "OTTL"@"SEL$2")
USE_HASH(@"SEL$15993197" "FNL"@"SEL$2")
USE_NL(@"SEL$15993197" "MSO"@"SEL$2")
USE_NL(@"SEL$15993197" "MPP"@"SEL$2")
USE_NL(@"SEL$15993197" "OOL1"@"SEL$2")
USE_HASH(@"SEL$15993197" "ASPA"@"SEL$2")
USE_NL(@"SEL$15993197" "GSB"@"SEL$2")
SWAP_JOIN_INPUTS(@"SEL$15993197" "MDSD"@"SEL$2")
SWAP_JOIN_INPUTS(@"SEL$15993197" "OTTL"@"SEL$2")
SWAP_JOIN_INPUTS(@"SEL$15993197" "FNL"@"SEL$2")
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
END_OUTLINE_DATA
110 rows selected.
SQL> spool off

How Distinguish planning data and Actual data in a Planning cube

Hi,
I want to dispaly planning data & actaul data in a query how can i do it?
in my query it is showing all the requests it is not distinguishing.

Well use infoobject 0VTYPE for actual and plan differentiation
and 0VERSION to categorise which version of Plan data it is,typically you might have different planning versions .
Example
0VTYPE = 10 actual
0VTYPE = 20 plan
0VERSION = 001
0VERSION = 002
0VERSION = 003
Business decides which 0version value to be taken as final planning version once freezed.0VTYPE = 10 for actuals is always one ,it do not have 0VERSION to be taken in to account.
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP..

Data Source to upload plan data for CO_OM_CCA_: CC: Costs and Allocations

Hi Guru's,
We have Data source that which upload Actual data for CCA (0CO_OM_CCA_1 - Cost Centers:cost and allocations). Every time it is full upload before loading the data deletion of previous load request will be done.
One more information required that i have checked in the BW cube for plan data it is available in the info cube for one cost center and rest of the costcenter i don't have the data now the users are requesting to upload the plan data for rest of cost centers.
Now as per the business requirement the users are requesting to upload the plan data in to the same i am not sure whether it will pull the plan data with actuals in to BW cube. Is there any alternate with the same data source or else is there any specific data source for uploading Costs and Allocations plan data
Please suggest me how can i go a head with this requirement.
Thanks in Advance.
Ganni

You can use the same datasource to load plan/budget data to the cube for all the costcenters. And regarding the actuals, you can use 0CO_OM_CCA_9 datasource to load to actuals cube and create a multi on top of both plan and actuals cube for reporting purposes.

Plan data missing in KE30

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for