POs without payment terms

Hello SAP gurus,
we've implemented SAP SRM on an Extended Classic Scenario with SAP R/3 as the backend system. Recently we are facing a problem with the payment terms if the following steps are executed:
Creation of a S.C.-> Creation of a Bid Invitation->Insertion of a Bid->Acceptation of the Bid->Creation of the PO
When we create a PO out of an accepted Bid the PO doesn't inheritate any payment terms and, although we try to put them (via Web Interface) from the drop down menu, the payment term field remains blank.
We have also tried to push the payment terms in table BBP_PDHGP on field PMNTTRMS but we still can't see anything from the Web interface.
Is there a solution? Do you have any ideas? I really would appreciate your help.
Thanks.
Giovanni Ottavio Lo Brutto

Hi,
If you want to make a report then for the payment term in the purchase order
use table EKKO field ZTERM and to check this payment term with credit date in invoice verification you can use table RBKP field ZTERM for paymen term and ZBD1T for no. of days this no. of days is ref. to the baseline date in field ZFBDT in table RBKP.
regards,
zafar
Edited by: zafar karnalkar on Jul 14, 2011 8:13 AM

Similar Messages

Different discount date from that of due date without using payment terms

Hi,
We would like have separate discount due date from due date without using payment terms for each invoice.
We wants to modify ERDK-FAEDS but unable to find suitable event/exit for the same.
So can anyone suggest any event where this can possibly be achived.
Regards,
Paresh

Hi,
We are using continuous days for working out due date from document date.
But for discount due date business sought to provide only working days (say 7 days) from document date.
So as to satisfy this requirement, I had adopted event R436 where system intially takes values provided but somehow it gets cleared in below lines. So I am unable to find a workaround to resolve this issue.
PERFORM get_user_exit_function USING 'R436'.
LOOP AT t_fbstab WHERE funcc <> 'ISU_SAMPLE_R436'.
 tmp_erdk = p_iiu-print_doc-erdk.
 tmp_erdz[] = p_iiu-print_doc-t_erdz[].
 CALL FUNCTION t_fbstab-funcc
 EXPORTING
 x_invoice_param = p_param
 x_invoice_unit = p_iiu
 TABLES
 xy_printdoc_lines = tmp_erdz
 y_new_bill_lines = tmp_new_bill_lines
 CHANGING
 xy_printdoc_header = tmp_erdk
 EXCEPTIONS
 error_message = 1.
Regards,
Paresh

Vendor invoie for multiple POs with different payment terms

Hi,
We have a vendor which send a single invoice for multiple POs which have different payment terms. Now if we create a single invoice in MIRO, then only a payment term can be applied.
However user want to pay to the vendor corresponding to the PO terms.
Please let us know any way apart from creating multiple MIRO documents.
Regds,
Nand

Hi,
You can achieve so in standard SAP.
Go to OBY6 and activate the check box "Enable Amount Split" in your company code. Then in MIRO, a new tab will appear in the header as "Amount Split"
In this tab, you can split the vendor invoice in multiple lines with respective payment method and payment term.
I hope this will help you.
Regards,
Gaurav

Automatic Payment terms without referrring Customer Master nor manual entry

Hi,
I have a credit memo with reference to one billing document. It is automatically coming with payment terms which is not maintained in customer master nor manual entry in the document. I had checked all the configuration related settings for the document and payment terms assignment. I had debugged and checked for any user exit or function module.
I have no clue in this regard and can anybody throw some light regarding to fix the problem.
Regards
Sashikanth

Hi,
Check if the billing document has payment terms. If yes, even if customer master doesnt contain payment terms the payment terms will be copied to the credit memo through standard copying control maintained in IMG, when you create a document with reference to some document this copying control gets activated.
Also check user exit RV60AFZZ if there's any code written in it to default payment terms by billing doc type.
Regards,
Amit

Urgent please .. condition found without access sequence for payment terms

Dear All,
I am seeing the pricing analysis. there is a condition type for which a value is found and it gave me certain payment terms. but when I tried to see the condition record, I am unable to find it.
Message says ''The cash discount condition amount is not determined using condition technology, but directly from the terms of payment table"
Please help in understading the meaning of these messge.
When I looked at condition type, access sequence in not assigned.
Thank You.
Regards
venkat
Edited by: venkat Kumbham on Apr 28, 2008 3:09 PM

Hi Venkat,
We do not maintain an access sequence for cash discount. Its determined from the terms of payment defined by finance ( check Spro - Financial Accounting>Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable>Business Transactions> Incoming invoice/Crdit Memos>Maintain Terms of Payment )
Eg: 14 days 2%, 30 net
You can select the relevent Terms of payment in the customer master.
You will see the cash discount when you do the billing.
Hope its clear...
Rgds,
sapdt

Defaulting Payment Terms on POs

I know that Payment Terms normally default on PO's from the vendor master, but I have a couple of questions:
1. We have vendors with VN and OA partners defined. Is there a way to have PO's defailt payment terms from the OA partner instead of the VN?
2. We have some PO's created from contracts and in those cases, do payment terms default from the contract instead of the vendor master?
Thanks,
Rick

HI Rick,
With refernce to first point in you can flag the default partner in the vendor master-partner functions it Specifies a partner as the default for a particular partner function.
With Reference to Second point, Dont maintain any terms of Payment in Vendor master, maintain in contract only so it will pick from contact.
Anil paterddy
Edited by: anil kumar on Aug 25, 2009 12:40 PM

Cash Discount without using Payment Term

Hi,
Generally, We will post discount for customer with Payment terms in F-28 transaction.This is general process.In addition, if we want to post a discount that was not part of a payment term or part of the original order how do we do that during payment processing?
Kindly advise..
Thanks
Supriya

Hello,
There is no such mechanism in SAP.
You have two options:
1. Create another terms of payment with additional discount and allow the user the change the terms of payment at the time of posting.
2. If you want to give additional discount, pass a JV by debiting discount account and crediting the customer account and make the payment.
Regards,
Ravi

Payment terms on vendor master

Hi experts,
in vendor master we maintain payment terms at accounting view and purchasing view,
both are mandatory to set or only one at accounting view is mandatory?
is it possible to change payment terms at purchasing view apart from payment terms set in accounting view ?
if we set at accounting view only is it available for all purchase orgs ?
if we give it in both which one is prioratised ?
please clarify in this asap,
will reward points
Thnaks & regards

There are many invoices coming into a company for which you will never create purchase orders. Such as from customs, from the electrical supplier, from a restaurant for a business dinner.. For such vendors you do not need purchasing views, hence it is necessary to have a field for payment terms at company code level. You will post invoices with FI transactions.
It is possible to create POs long before company code data is needed in a vendor master. For a PO you need payment terms, payment terms will only default from purchasing org data to the PO.
You post your invoice using the invoice verfication transaction of MM: e.g. MIRO in reference to the PO.
Usually you would have the same payment term at comapny code and purchasing org level for one vendor, as the vendor will not necessarily know if you have SAP and if you order with or without PO.

MM INVOICE created with different Payment Terms and 2 differents PO.

I will explain with an example to understand better the issue and why this could happen, (for the same Co.Code):
On 05.09.2011, 5203795529 was posted with payment terms D030.
At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
On 12.09.2011, 5203806574 was posted with payment terms D030.
At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
In OCT, user receives another invoice for this 2 POs (4501232207 & 4501105395) and trying to post MIRO again but this time, user encountered error 'Payment terms in purchase order 4501232207 differ from current terms'. In order to proceed, user has changed payment term for 4501105395 from D030 to D031 on 17.10.2011 and proceed with invoice posting without error. 5203878342 was posted on 17.10.2011.
The vendor always has the same Payment Term: D031
Now the question is, why user is able to post without any problem previously even though there's different payment terms on both POs and not now anymore?.
Thanks

Thanks Jayavar,
Nobody has changed anything, (I mean the PO Payment terms), until October in PO. 4501105395
The error message is when the user try to post with MIRO PO´s (4501232207 & 4501105395):
"Terms of payment in purchase order 4501232207 (always with Payment term D031), differ from current terms"
Message no. M8349
Diagnosis:
The terms of payment in the current invoice differ from those in the current purchase order 4501232207, other terms of payment were stipulated:
Terms of payment key D031
1st cash discount period 31 days 0,000%
Either you have selected more purchase orders with different terms of payment, or you have changed the terms of payment manually.
But the strange thing is in SEP, there's already this difference & there is no problem posting the invoice & the problem only comes when in OCT.
Thanks and Rgs
Francisco

Different Payment Terms in vendor invoice, (with differ. PO)

I will explain with an example to understand better the issue and why this could happen, (for the same Co.Code):
On 05.09.2011, 5203795529 was posted with payment terms D030.
At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
On 12.09.2011, 5203806574 was posted with payment terms D030.
At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
In OCT, user receives another invoice for this 2 POs (4501232207 & 4501105395) and trying to post MIRO again but this time, user encountered error 'Payment terms in purchase order 4501232207 differ from current terms'. In order to proceed, user has changed payment term for 4501105395 from D030 to D031 on 17.10.2011 and proceed with invoice posting without error. 5203878342 was posted on 17.10.2011.
The vendor always has the same Payment Term: D031
Now the question is, why user is able to post without any problem previously even though there's different payment terms on both POs and not now anymore?.
The strange thing is in SEP, there's already this difference & there is no problem posting the invoice & the problem only comes when in OCT.
Why does this happen?
Thanks and Regards

Hi Vena,
Originally the error message was:
"Terms of payment in purchase order 4501232207 (always with Payment term D031), differ from current terms"
Message no. M8349
Diagnosis:
The terms of payment in the current invoice differ from those in the current purchase order 4501232207, other terms of payment were stipulated:
Terms of payment key D031
1st cash discount period 31 days 0,000%
Either you have selected more purchase orders with different terms of payment, or you have changed the terms of payment manually.
But the strange thing is in SEP, there's already this difference & there is no problem posting the invoice & the problem only comes when in OCT.
Thanks and Rgs
Francisco

The payment terms are not getting reflected in PO

Hi,
We are in SRM5.0 Extended Classic scenario.
We have created new payment term in ECC and transferred to SRM using BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS and after tranferring it to SRM I am able to see the new payment term in table BBP_PAYTERM and BBP_PAYTERM_TEXT in SRM system.
But non of the payment terms are not reflecting into PO. We are not getting any errors while processing the PO.
Could you please suggest what may be the issue here.
Best Regards,
Siddappa

Hello Siddappa,
I am a little confused here with the scenario.
I understand that the payment terms are recenly created and replicated. So naturally they would have been updated in the relevant vendor master as well. Now has the vendor master been replicated to SRM from ECC once the payment terms were updated.
So from what you have mentioned "When we check the BBP_PD, the payment term is reflecting for the POs created after shopping cart approval."
So does this mean once the SC is approved then the PO is created and then the Terms of Payment are seen in the PO.
However "If the PO created through describe requirement, the Vendor will not assigned the PO created will go to Held status and buyer will process the order."
So does this mean since the Vendor is not mentioned the Terms of Payment is not being reflected and will happen only once the same is specified in the PO.
I have a question on whether after replicating the Payment Terms, has it been seen in any of the PO's created so far or it is always blank.
Regards
Pramod

How to get vendor payment terms

Hi all,
I am creating a report. I need to get vendor payment terms. There are invoices without PO, how can I retrieve the payment terms for those cases.
Thanks.

Hi nene
in case of invoice without PO, The payment term will be selected from the vendor master data (in View : payment terms transaction in XK03).
Check payment term in master data is exist or not.
the data is in the table LFB1 : Field ZTERM
Regards
Wiboon

AP Payment term

Hi,
I need to create a payment term for invoices dated from the 25th of the prior month through the 24th of the current month, payment is due in full (net) by the 25th of the next (proximo) month. e.g. Invoice range 06-25-2010 to 07-24-2010 due in full by 08-25-2010.
Please help me on this.
Rosalina Gait

With the same payment term you can define 2 different due date calulation based on the day limit. Please do F4 on the "Day Limit" field.
In you case, enter 24 in the day limit, and enter additional month "1" and Fixed date "25", and another one( for the same payment term) without day limit "empty" and enter additional month "2" and Fixed date "25".
If the "empty" day limit doesn't work, then please try with "31" as day limit. I don't remember the exact setting but the logic will definitely work with day limit
Thanks
Ron

Purchase Order Payment terms

Hi all,
I have a requirement of adding description of Payment terms in the sapscript . Earlier the script only prints terms without description. It use to get the value from , &'Terms of payment: 'PEKKO-ZBTXT& in the sap script MEDRUCK.
Now i added table T052u in the print program to get the description of payment term, the field is T052U-TEXT1.
While creating payment term from tcode OBB8,Eg: Payment term is Z001 and we enter No of days and percentage . Suppose i enter 10 days , how is the script printing as "Within 10 days due net ".
I want to know where this field is stored, Pekko is a structure so iam not able to see this.
Please do tell me which table do i get to see this payment term w.r.t to PO
Waiting for ur Reply's
Regards,
Shuja

Check table :T052U
Hope thisll give you idea
P.S award the points.
Good luck
Thanks
Saquib Khan
"Some are wise and some are otherwise"

Payment Term default to Purchase Order

Dear SAP guru,
We have problem that payment term is not defaulted to Purchase Order if the Purchase Order is converted from Purchase Requisition.
If purchase order is directly created in ME21N, the payment term will be defaulted from vendor master. However we have purchase requisition that is released/converted to purchase order, these POs willl not copy over the paymetn term from vendor master.
Can any one share how to make the PO always default payment term from vendor master eventhough it is converted from purchase requisition?
Thanks a lot in advance for your kind assisstance.
rgds
Dahlia

Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for your quick reply. No, the PR is not referenced to contract. The PR is for external process, therefore the flows is asa follow:
1. Production order creation; for external process system automatically create purchase requisition.
2. Purchase requisition will have vendor code defaulted from production order routing. In the routing for external process you can define the vendor code.
3. Convert the purchase requisition into purchase order.
The problem the purchase order will not have payment term default from vendor master.
Thks
Dahlia

POs without payment terms

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for