Prevent User Query on CSA!

Before version 4.5 of CSA, it was very easy to allow or disallow users access to the User Query boxes. Most users don't know what this information means, so why bother them? It seems that now this feature is set up separately on each policy or module?
What is the easiest method of locking down everyone in a group so that they do not get these User Query boxes?

I assume you mean User Interactive mode. So if I understand you want the users in a particular group to not be prompted by the events taht CSA generates.
The agent control rule is now in the ALL Windows group (for Windows users) that everybody goes in. You can either adjust this rule, which will affect ALL users or you can create a new rule that will go in specific groups that allow User Interaction for the groups that you want it allowed. THen disable the agent control rule in the ALL Windows group.

Similar Messages

  • How to prevent users to create their own private list ?

    Hello,
    Is there a way to prevent users to create their own private list ?
    Or to perform their own queries ?
    Thanks for your help.

    Any list or search will always query the database regardless of volume. For example, a user has access to just 1 account record. This record could be one of 10 million other account records. To allow the user to see this record, the entire account pool will be queried. That's where indexes help and queries are really fast.
    Turning off search is not the solution. Ensuring queries are optimized is the solution. For example, manager visibility always slows down the search because the nature of a manager visibility search requires compex search patterns. So you could turn off manager visibility for your company and use alternate means like books. Manager visibility search is a feature that's primarily used by small-to-medium-business (SMBs). Large enterprises should never use it.

  • Prevent user from downloading data

    Hi folks,
    I am currently exploring SQL Developer. I have this problem and hope u folks can help me.
    Currently, I am trying to prevent users that have access to the database from downloading ALL the data in the database, esp in the data window of the tables, user can easily right click and export the data into csv files etc. I was wondering if this can be disabled.
    Would it be disabled from the software i.e. sql developer or has it got something to do with the role and privileges that I need to set with the account??
    Any advice is appreciated.
    Thanks!

    The first question that comes to my mind is that if you are that worried about your users accessing data and copying it off then is SQL*Developer really a tool you want to be giving them access to. As others have stated, if the users have access via SQL*Plus then they can spool off the data to files. There are many other tools they could use to extract the information (MS-Access, MS-Query (part of Excel), JDeveloper &c, they could even write their own tool if they so wished).
    You either trust your users in which case SQL*Developer isn't a problem or you don't which means that you have to deal with more issues than just SQL*Developer. If there are certain fields that you don't want your users to be able to see but they need to access the table then you could, for example, deny them access to the table but create a view that excludes the fields you don't want them to see or use encryption/obfuscation from your application on those fields.
    Also, if you don't trust your users, you really need to talk to your HR department about hiring practices and salaries. Your company may be lax in it's hiring (hiring untrustwothy people) or not paying your staff enough (the less you pay yopur staff the easier they are to tempt).
    Stephen

  • In oracle rac, If user query a select query and in processing data is fetched but in the duration of fetching the particular node is evicted then how failover to another node internally?

    In oracle rac, If user query a select query and in processing data is fetched but in the duration of fetching the particular node is evicted then how failover to another node internally?

    The query is re-issued as a flashback query and the client process can continue to fetch from the cursor. This is described in the Net Services Administrators Guide, the section on Transparent Application Failover.

  • How to prevent users from running PRC: Transaction Import from WebADI form?

    Hi,
    We are 12.1.3 and trying to create a workflow to approve Project transactions coming through web ADI before they become effective. To this end, we want to prevent users from running the PRC: Transaction Import from the Web ADI.
    I know that if the checkbox Automatically run transaction import is not checked, the program does not run. But we want to hide this checkbox and not allow the possibility that the program could get triggered.
    To this end, we updated the BNE_INTEGRATORS_B with source='C'. This allows you to edit the integrator from Desktop Integration Manager.
    UPDATE BNE_INTEGRATORS_B SET SOURCE ='C' WHERE  INTEGRATOR_CODE ='PAXTTRXB'
    In the 4th step, where the value for Uploader Parameters is set, we have set boolean value to No. These are the fields on the page:
    Parameter Name: bne:import
    Display Name: Start Transaction Upload
    Data Type: Boolean
    Category: Field
    Default Value: Boolean Flag: No
    Description: start Transaction Import Concurrent Request
    Display Options: Displayed: Unchecked
    Display Options: Enabled: Checked
    Display Options: Required: Checked
    Prompt Left: Automatically submit Transaction import
    Display Type: Check Box
    Maximun Size: 100
    Display Size:100
    Now the checkbox is not appearing for the user to check it, But the program is automatically running when you hit Upload in the WebADI. 

    Hi ,
    Try removing the PRC: Transaction Import Program from the request group for the responsibility used by customers to submit the WebADI and then check if the program launches.
    Regards,
    Raghavan

  • Hi All, We are in to Release 11.5.10.2.There is a specific requirement to Prevent users from creating Manual Sales Orders in oracle and yet users should be able to book the Sales Orders Imported from CRM system into Orcale.Please advise.

    Hi All, We are in to Release 11.5.10.2.There is a specific requirement to Prevent users from creating Manual Sales Orders in Oracle and  yet users should be able to book the Sales Orders Imported from CRM system into Orcale.Please advise.

    Thanks for your advise.
    However, I missed to mention that we have two set of users  One is for Finished Goods and another for Spares.
    Only Spares users need to be prevented from creating Direct/Manual Sales Orders in Oracle.
    As you suggested, if this will be done at Form level, that may Disallow FG users also to create Manula Sales Orders which should not be the case.
    Further, I tried to test one scenario through Processing Constraints but it did not work.
    Application
    OM
    Validation Type
    Entity
    Temp
    Short Name
    TBL
    Validation Semantics
    Created By
    Equal To
    User(Myself)
    Processing Cosntraint
    Application
    OM
    Entity
    Order Header
    Constraint
    Operation
    User Action
    Create
    Not Allowed
    Conditions
    Group
    Scope
    Validation Entity
    Record Set
    Validation Template
    101
    Any
    Order Header
    Order
    Above Created
    Please advise.

  • How do I prevent users from being able to update Firmware

    I have several users (14) with iPad 2 and they rely on an in-house developed App. we have yet to test this App on iOS 5.1 and therefore want to avoid any of the users updating the iPads at all cost!
    this question is in two parts:
    How can I prevent users from upgrading firmware themselves short of just asking nicely?
    How can I stop the iPad from automatically downloading the Upgrade when I deploy a Policy using the iPhone Configuration Utility?
    Any advice would be great!

    We've been looking at the AirWatch mdm and have been told it has this capability.  Not sure if it would be justified from an economic standpoint for you, however. 

  • How to Prevent User for Multiple click on form Submit button ??

    Hi,
    Is there any easy solution rather than AJAX or any HARD Solution.
    to prevent user from being submit for only once...
    So database record remain consistent rather than redundant.
    if any JAVASCRIPT SOLUTION IT WOULD BE BETTER ONE.
    WHAT SHOULD I DO ??

    Use the disabled property, set it to true and then submit the form programmatically.
    <html>
    <head>
    <script>
    function validate()
         var textfield = document.getElementById('textfield');
         var submitButton = document.getElementById('submitbutton');
         var mainForm = document.getElementById('mainform');
         if ( textfield.value.length == 0 )
              alert("Validation Failed");
              return false;
         submitButton.disabled = true;
         alert("The button has been disabled, going to submit now");
         mainform.submit();     
    </script>
    </head>
    <body>
    <form id="mainform" action="#" method="GET">
    <input type="text" value="" id="textfield"/>
    <input type="submit" value="Try Me!" id="submitbutton" onclick="return validate();" />
    </form>
    </body>
    </html>A reminder though, this is JavaScript and these are Java forums.

  • Sharepoint 2010: prevent users from editing a list in the datasheet view

    Hi,
    I have a sharepoint 2010 list that I need to prevent users to edit from the datasheet view. This is because I have edited the add item form on sharepoint designer and included some custom code. Moreover, I need to allow the users to view the list in datasheet
    view to make use of the datasheet custom filter view feature which is not available in the standard view. So I need users to access the datasheet view of the list in read mode only but be able to edit the list in standard view only. Is this possible? How?
    Thanks,
    George

    Hi.
    Maybe this helps...I found some users having the problem that the list WAS read only in datasheet view...this is a list of reasons why this could happen:
    Certain columns, such as Created By and Modified, are always read-only. Values for these columns are entered automatically.
    The changes you made to the selected row or column have been submitted to the server. If there is no conflict or error, you will be able to edit the row or column after the changes have been saved.
    There is an unresolved conflict or error in the selected row or column. Resolve the conflict or error before attempting to edit the selected row or column.
    The list is set up to require content approval, and you are viewing the list in the All Items view.
    In the My Submissions view of a list that requires content approval, the
    Approval Status and Comment column are read-only. Only a user with Manage Lists right can edit these two columns.
    Attachments are read-only in a list that requires content approval. You cannot view or edit attachments in any of the views.
    The document in the current row has been checked out by a user. You cannot edit the columns in the row until the user checks the document in.
    You do not have permission to edit the column or row. Contact the list author for more information.
    (from the help)
    You could also check:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2274841
    Reverse engineer and you may have a solution? ;-)
    Regards
    hr class="sig">Thomas Balkeståhl - Technical Specialist - SharePoint

  • Is there any way to prevent users from ship confirming on a particular date?

    Hello All,
    We have a requirement to prevent users from ship confirming on a particular date. This is due to they are performing Annual Physical Inventory.
    Is it possible to restrict users performing shipping transactions on this particular date?
    I have tried adding exception to the existing Calendar set at org level and there is no customer specific Calendar defined, however it is still allowing me to perform ship confirm.
    Please let me know if you have any suggestion on this requirement.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Yes is Possible.
    You can add An Exception in Your Shipping Calender.
    So when Some one tries to ship an Order on that date Oracle will automatically select Next possible date.
    Thanks
    Shameer

  • Error in User Query

    Hello, I have the following User Query:
    SELECT T.USERID As EmpID, OHEM.FIRSTNAME' 'OHEM.LASTNAME, OHEM.U_RATE AS GeneralRate, T.CARDCODE As CardCode, T.CARDNAME As CardName, SUM(ISNULL(T.APPROVED_HOURS,0)*ISNULL(T.RATE,0)) As BilledAmount, T.GENCHECK AS CheckNumber, OVPM.[CheckSum], OVPM.DOCDATE
    FROM SCCG_WB_TIME AS T LEFT JOIN OHEM ON OHEM.EMPID=T.USERID LEFT JOIN OVPM ON T.GENCHECK = OVPM.DOCNUM
    WHERE ISNULL(T.GENCHECK, 0)<>0 AND <b>T.USERID =[%0]</b>
    GROUP BY T.USERID, OHEM.FIRSTNAME' 'OHEM.LASTNAME, OHEM.U_RATE, T.CARDCODE, T.CARDNAME, T.GENCHECK, OVPM.[CheckSum], OVPM.DOCDATE
    I get an error because of the variable I have. When I press Execute I just get '' (SEWSY) error message in red. Without the variable is working fine. Please help me!
    Thank you,
    Irina

    Hi Irinca,
    I think (can't test it) the problem is the not-system-nor-usertable-but-yours table created in SBO that you're passing the variable (SCCG_WB_TIME, just in case).
    Try something like,
    DECLARE @UserId int
    SET @UserId = (SELECT TOP 1 T0.INTERNAL_K FROM [dbo].[OUSR] T0 WHERE T0.U_NAME = '[%0]')
    ...(your query....)... T.USERID = @UserId...
    HTH,
    Ian

  • Terms user query Changes in unit price in purchase order and a/p invoice

    Dear sir
         please give me a term user query for , if any changes in unit price in purchase order and a/p invoice

    Hi,
    Try this:
    SELECT  Distinct ' true'
    FROM adoc T2
    JOIN ado1 T0 ON T2.docentry = T0.docentry AND T2.Objtype = '22'
    JOIN por1 T1 ON T1.docentry = T0.docentry AND T1.Linenum=T0.Linenum
    WHERE  $[$38.14.number] != T0.Price
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarajan

  • How to prevent users from saving and emailing intranet documents externally

    Someone in our company needs to upload a pdf to our sharepoint intranet site for internal-only use. How can I prevent users from downloading it and emailing it externally?
    I mean, a user could screenshot it I guess, but I need to give management a due diligence answer.

    You would need to look into a reverse proxy/firewall that had the ability to block access based on content. This isn't something you can accomplish out of the box with SharePoint (even with AD RMS).
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Is it possible to use parameter in a user query with subquery ?

    Hi ,
    i need to use parameter ( [%0] ) in user query using a subquery , but i have errors message when i execute the query 
    example :
    SELECT T0.[DocNum] as docnum, T0.[DocTotal] as cde , 0 as fact FROM ORDR T0 WHERE T0.[CardCode]  =N'[%0]'
    union all
    SELECT T0.[DocNum], 0 as cde,T0.[DocTotal] as fact FROM OINV T0 WHERE T0.[CardCode]  =N'[%0]'
    works fine
    but ( exactly the same query in the subquery )
    Select t2.Docnum ,t2.cde , t2.fact from
    SELECT T0.[DocNum] as docnum, T0.[DocTotal] as cde , 0 as fact FROM ORDR T0 WHERE T0.[CardCode]  =N'[%0]'
    union all
    SELECT T0.[DocNum], 0 as cde,T0.[DocTotal] as fact FROM OINV T0 WHERE T0.[CardCode]  =N'[%0]'
    ) t2
    return an error message
    the same query without parameter works fine too :
    Select Docnum ,cde , fact from
    SELECT T0.[DocNum] as docnum, T0.[DocTotal] as cde , 0 as fact FROM ORDR T0 WHERE T0.[CardCode]  ='C1'
    union all
    SELECT T0.[DocNum], 0 as cde,T0.[DocTotal] as fact FROM OINV T0 WHERE T0.[CardCode]  ='C1'
    ) t2
    Is it possible to use parameter in a subquery ?
    thanks

    Try this one:
    declare @cc nvarchar(20)
    set @cc=/*Select c.cardcode from OCRD c where c.cardcode=*/'[%0]'
    Select Docnum ,cde , fact from
    SELECT T0.[DocNum] as docnum, T0.[DocTotal] as cde , 0 as fact FROM ORDR T0 WHERE T0.[CardCode]  =@cc
    union all
    SELECT T0.[DocNum], 0 as cde,T0.[DocTotal] as fact FROM OINV T0 WHERE T0.[CardCode]  =@cc
    ) t2

  • Viewlink between Custom VO "Cannot set user query to view"

    We have an application where we have extended custom VO and EO’s to get data from flat files. It all looks fine till we create a viewlink for a LOV with two related VO’s. The viewlink VO fails we get message of the form -Cannot set user query to view "CustomVO1" because it is a destination in a view link”. Are there any methods to override in the custom VO/EO or any parameter to be added to configs. Has someone tried this out

    Thanks for the update and for sharing the solution!
    Regards,
    Hussein

Maybe you are looking for

  • Creating Login Pages - Server Behavior Issues

    Hello, I been trying to find a solution to this problem for this past week. I'm having issues with creating a login page. First, I get the page created with a username text box, password text box, save username checkbox, etc. Next, I add the server b

  • Dashlet configuration in Prime! Infrastructure?

    I have created my own custome dashboard under Detail Dashboards. I have added 4 "Interface Tx and Rx Utilization" Dashlets. When I edit them, I don't see how I tie them to an interface? In the Interface Detail Dashboard, the entire page uses a Filter

  • Can't see my printer on AirPrint

    I can print wireless from all my pc's and MacBook with no problem - but my iPhones and iPad all signed on to the same house network don't see the printer

  • Migrate from time machine backup without losing pre-installed applications?

    I purchased a used mac mini A1283 that came with pre-loaded OSX Lion and iWork11 on the harddrive (no CDs/DVDs). I have a "time machine backup" from a previous mac of mine running OSX Lion but without iWork11. I would like to restore the time machine

  • Did fast user switching work this way before 10.4.9?

    Funny, I don't remember it working this way... If I switch to another user with FUS, the dialog box appears for that user to enter their password, but- the underlying desktop can still be fully manipulated. Was it always this way?