Pricing Conditions Rounding Issue
Currently, our system has two pricing condition types. ZP,ZD. The ZP conditions represent a base price and the ZD represent a differential(- discount or + surcharge). Both are based on the same hierarchy. ZP00,ZP01,ZP02.ZP03,ZP04. A ZP01 overrides a ZP00 and ZP03 overrides ZP00, ZP01,ZP02 and so on and so forth. All transactions are settled in USD. However, most of the time the ZP, ZDs are based on prices that extend out more than two decimal places. I am experiencing and issue because SAP calculates the ZP and ZD separately and is rounding each. For example the ZP or base price in this case is $2.245. This times quantity of 3,999Gal = $8,977.755. SAP rounds this to $8,977.76. SAP then calcs. the differential ZD $.0235X3,999Gal = $93.9765. SAP rounds to $93.98. This is a total price of $8,977.76+$93.98 =$9,071.74. However the unit price is ZP $2.245 + ZD $0.0235 = $2.2685. If you take this price multiplied by the quantity $2.2685 X 3,999Gal = $9,071.7315. So the actual total price is off by 1ct because SAP treats the ZP and ZD as two separate calculations. I have seen various ideas on how to fix, from creating another pricing condition, to user exits. I was wondering if there was a preferred method? Or if there is a simpler solution?
Good Evening,
1. Please review OSS NOTE 80183 regarding Rounding.
Values calculated in pricing are always rounded to the amount of
decimal places which the used document currency owns. As subsequent
processing steps setup on this rounded value rounding differences can
occur in the calculation of the price per unit or in subtotal line.
To bypass such effects note 80183 describes possible solutions to
reduce / bypass this effect.
A few problems in rounding after applying note 80183, variant 2 have
been recorded where it was recommended to use the formulas 919 and
920 on all discounts and surcharges that appear before NETP and the
problem was solved.
2. In transaction V/06 there is a field under header 'Control data1'
which can effect how the system rounds off condition values during
pricing:
->> Rounding rule
The rule that determines how the system rounds off condition
values during pricing. The last digit will be rounded.
Example
o In the standard rounding rule '_', values are rounded off according
to business standards:
10.454 -> 10.45 DEM
10.455 -> 10.46 DEM
o In rounding rule 'A', values are always rounded up:
10.459 -> 10.46 DEM
10.451 -> 10.46 DEM
o In rounding rule 'B', values are always rounded down:
1045.9 -> 1045 LIT
1045.1 -> 1045 LIT
In this example, the currency of the condition rate is Italian Lira.
The Italian Lira does not have any places after the point.
3. Also check if the condition type is set as item condition as well
as group condition in transaction V/06. What this means is that
the system will calculate the value of the condition on header level
and compares it with the sum of item values in the document.
Any rounding difference (KONV-KDIFF) detected, will be populated
in the line item with greatest value or in first line item if all are
of equal value.
In other cases where there is no adjustment because there is no
rounding difference when comparing the header value and the sum of
item values.
->> Solution to this scenario -
If you remove the 'group condition' setting, the system will then
calculate amount for the items directly and you will not get the
rounding. You must decide which setting is more suited for your
business. This is not a bug, but works as per designed.
EXAMPLE: MWST - tax condition (a group condition)
Item 10 16% of 100.90 = 16.14
Item 20 16% of 100.90 = 16.14
Total = 32.28
I hope this helps you!
Kind Regards,
Martina McElwain
SD Forum Moderator
Similar Messages
-
Pricing condition type Issue YPR0--- ZPR1
Hi All,
WE have a pricing issue, for example we have a condition type YPR0 and we use a pricing procedure which i will call ZME600, we are basically creating a new condition type to be called ZPR1 to replace YPR0, now in the copy control, delivery document to billing, for item category YBHP, the price type setting is ''G ''which means copy pricing elements unchanged and redetermine taxes, if we use this option, when we upload new price list, create a billing document, it will change the price on all open sales orders rather than keep the original price, so option is, change the pricing type setting to a ''D'' which basically copies all pricing elements unchanged, will this be a better solution? what happens when we start using new condition type ZPR1 to replace YPRO, the system will no longer recognise YPR0, if there any options to work around this, some have suggested linking YPR0 to ZPR1 in the pricing procedure??Hi,
Please check V/06 conditiontype functionlality of tht condition type. There it might have been activated for both header level and item level. that is the reason it is printing in both levels. Please do needful setting there..
Regards
Sankar -
Hi gurus,
i have a problem with pricing conditon type. The problem is the Conditon type which i am working as header condition and this condion in header coming correctly. Now the question the same conditon coming in item also why so. one morehting this condition type coming twice in the detail screen. Why so.
thanks & Regards
Ponts will awardedHi,
Please check V/06 conditiontype functionlality of tht condition type. There it might have been activated for both header level and item level. that is the reason it is printing in both levels. Please do needful setting there..
Regards
Sankar -
Hi All,
I have a requirement from finance. In the net amount the Decimel places should be rounded off so that the decimel is always Zero.
eg. if the Net Amount is 50.14 = 50.00
eg. if the Net Amount is 50.19 = 50.00
eg. if the Net Amount is 50.65 = 51.00
Do we have a standard routine for this. If no can you please help how the routine will look like for the above scenario.
Regards,
RajneeshThank you.
I maintained the entry in T001R.
However in Maintain Pricing Procedure i do not see the Routine 13 as seen in vofm.
In Cal Type i see routine 13 named as 'Minimum ValueSurchrg' and Routine 17 as 'Rounding as perT001R' with a different functionality as below
Round the amount according to T001R
form frm_kondi_wert_017.
check: rekursiv ne 'A'.
check: t001r-reinh ne 0.
xkwert = xkwert * ( 1000 / t001r-reinh ) / 1000 * t001r-reinh.
endform.
Any clue friends -
Rounding Issue with Pricing Conditions
Currently we have in place a pricing hierchery that consists of two pricing conditions. ZP for base price and ZD for a +-differential. Both conditions begin with 00. ZP00. ZP01, ZP03, ZP04. If a ZP01 exists it overrides a ZP00. If a ZP03 exists it overrides ZP00,ZP01, etc. So basically the higher the number means it overrides anything underneath it. The ZD conditions are setup exactly the same way. I am currently running into a round issue. We settle all transactions in USD however the manual and differentials are often based on prices that go out more than 2 decimal places. SAP is treating the calculation for the ZP and ZD as two separate calculations. It rounds each of them and then combines for a total price. So if the base price ZP02 is $2.245 multiplied by quantity 3,999 = $8,977.755 which it rounds to $8,977.76 and the differential ZD02 is $.0235 this = $93.9765 which it rounds to $93.98 for a total price of $9,071.74. However if you add the ZD02 + the ZD02 you get a total unit price of $2.2685. This multiplied times the quantity 3,999 = $9,071.731 which is correct. But because SAP does each calc separately the price comes out to $9,071.74 or off 1CT. I have seen various solutions on how to fix this from user exits to creating additional conditions that takes both ZP and ZD conditions and calculates them as one but I was hoping someone had come up with something better? Or if there was a preferred method?
Currently we have in place a pricing hierchery that consists of two pricing conditions. ZP for base price and ZD for a +-differential. Both conditions begin with 00. ZP00. ZP01, ZP03, ZP04. If a ZP01 exists it overrides a ZP00. If a ZP03 exists it overrides ZP00,ZP01, etc. So basically the higher the number means it overrides anything underneath it. The ZD conditions are setup exactly the same way. I am currently running into a round issue. We settle all transactions in USD however the manual and differentials are often based on prices that go out more than 2 decimal places. SAP is treating the calculation for the ZP and ZD as two separate calculations. It rounds each of them and then combines for a total price. So if the base price ZP02 is $2.245 multiplied by quantity 3,999 = $8,977.755 which it rounds to $8,977.76 and the differential ZD02 is $.0235 this = $93.9765 which it rounds to $93.98 for a total price of $9,071.74. However if you add the ZD02 + the ZD02 you get a total unit price of $2.2685. This multiplied times the quantity 3,999 = $9,071.731 which is correct. But because SAP does each calc separately the price comes out to $9,071.74 or off 1CT. I have seen various solutions on how to fix this from user exits to creating additional conditions that takes both ZP and ZD conditions and calculates them as one but I was hoping someone had come up with something better? Or if there was a preferred method?
-
Pricing condition in sales order-issue
Experts,
i am facing a very strange issue, functional consultant
did some configuration ,such that when header of
sales order have condition type ,let say some 'ZXX',
this pricing conditon should be applicable to all
the schedule line with pricing condition as 'ZXX' where material in schedule line is let say 'ZPP',that mean
these should only be applicable for material type
'ZPP',we are facing strange issue , when scheule line no
10 is having material 'ZPP' ,then pricing conditon is
working fine('ZXX'),but if scheule line no 10 is having
material other than 'ZPP' and if scheule line no 20
is having material 'ZPP' ,then for scheule line no 20
pricing condition is not getting copied from headergoto tcode - <b>vk13</b>
note that [A]--sequence for plant /material
note that <b>--sequence for plant /material/cafgroup
enter ur pricing condition type and
for the <b>plant/material</b> combination etc.. [A]-
may be in the access sequence ur consultant ave given it to a new sequence say <b>plant/material/caf group</b> .. --<b>
like this
suppose say item 10 is for option [A] so access sequence is for this only ..cause material is now in plant/material
now say item 20 is for option <b> so
material at line item 2 will fall under this sequence ..
cumulatively u need to get the total ..
now if the material is same in line 10 20 , u will have to fetch the values from both the tables in sequence and not one table will store the values ..
cause sequence pass for the material is now [A] and <b>
rememebr that per classification the values are stored in diff table like a906 ,, a90*..
in order to fetch that u need to get it from the tables of classification
and then cumulate it ..
this is important ..
regards,
VIjay.
Message was edited by: Vijay -
Issue in maintaining the freight condition in SRM pricing conditions
Hi All,
We have maintained the freight condition in SRM pricing conditions But when a buyer try to add the freight condition it does not give any field to add the value.We want the freight condition at the header level.
Let me know if there is any service needs to be activated or we have to activate any business function to enable this.
Please find the attached document to check the settings and actual issue while entering the freight condition.
This is urgent and please provide your suggestion to avoid this issue.
Thanks,
AnkurHi Anil,
Its not a standard functionality to get the Header level price condition in SRM PO . I got to know that we need to implement note 1898304 for SRM 7.13 SP01 and activate a Business function.Can anyone let me know how it used to handle in previous versions.
Thanks,
Ankur -
Issue with BAPI CONTRACT CREATE while uploading pricing conditions
Hi Experts
I am using BAPI CONTRACT CREATE to create Purchase Contract ME31K
I am facing the issue while passing pricing conditions Could you please help me regarding this
Could you please help me along with this what are the values has to pass
Thanks
Vijay Kumar ReddyHi Experts
I am using BAPI CONTRACT CREATE to create Purchase Contract ME31K
I am facing the issue while passing pricing conditions Could you please help me regarding this
gs_oucondition-item_no = w_data-evrtp.
gs_oucondition-serial_id = '1'.
gs_oucondition-cond_count = '01'.
gs_oucondition-cond_type = w_data-cond1.
MOVE w_data-amnt1 TO gs_oucondition-cond_value.
gs_oucondition-currency = w_data-curr1.
gs_oucondition-numerator = '1'.
gs_oucondition-denominator = '1'.
gs_oucondition-change_id = 'I'.
APPEND gs_oucondition TO gt_oucondition.
CLEAR gs_oucondition.
gs_ouconditionx-item_no = w_data-evrtp.
gs_ouconditionx-serial_id = '1'.
gs_ouconditionx-cond_count = '01'.
gs_ouconditionx-item_nox = c_x.
gs_ouconditionx-serial_idx = c_x.
gs_ouconditionx-cond_countx = c_x.
gs_ouconditionx-cond_type = c_x.
gs_ouconditionx-cond_value = c_x.
gs_ouconditionx-currency = c_x.
gs_ouconditionx-numerator = c_x.
gs_ouconditionx-denominator = c_x.
APPEND gs_ouconditionx TO gt_ouconditionx.
CLEAR gs_ouconditionx.
Could you please help me along with this what are the values has to pass.
these are the parameters passing to the condition structure while executing bapi i am getting error like enter quantity conversion.
but with the same data i am able to create contract using SE37 by directly executing the Function module.
and if i have net price in my excel sheet also i am able to create contract using my program.
the only problem with pricing conditions alternatively there will be no net price..
Please really it will be a challenging question....
Thanks
Vijay Kumar Reddy -
I have an issue with pricing condition ZPRO (basic price )
Hello gurus
I have an issue with pricing condition ZPRO (basic price ).
users created a sales order, and the basic price ZPRO which is mannual is added twice ,now i want to put a check so that condition tpye zpro is not accepted twice by the system. please let me know how can i restrict system from accepting condition type zpro twice during sales order.
regds
Edited by: sapuser09 on Jul 26, 2011 8:44 AMHi,
Solution for this is very simple. Don't make any changes to the sales order user exit. Use condition exclusion for the condition type.
Do customization in the following path of IMG
Sales and distribution---- > Basic Functions--- > Pricing--
> Condition exclusion -- > Condition exclusion for groups of conditions
First In Define condition exclusion groups you have to define condition exclusion group (ZXXX)
Then in Assign condition types to the exclusion groups you have to assign condition type to the exclusion group (ZXXX ZPRO)
Then in Maintain Condition exclusion for pricing procedures select the pricing procedure where you have the problem and click Exclusion box present in Dialog structure box
You will be faced with Change view exclusion overview screen Click new entries
You will be faced with New entries overview of added entries screen.
Take serial no as 10 Condition exclusion procedure as B (Best condition with in condition type) In the exclusion group1 add the exclusion group ZXXX.
Save it and create order.
In the order pricing you will again observe that ZPRO appearing twice but only one will be active.
Changing user exit for this issue is not at all required and it must be only the last resort Try replicating the issue in your sand box system. As I had mentioned it will be picked twice but only one will be active.
Hope this helps.
Edited by: mokirala tilak on Aug 10, 2011 10:19 AM -
ECS: New Pricing condition for purchase order on item level
Hello Experts,
we use SRM 5.0 with the extend classic scenario.
We customized a new pricing condition (absolute discount), which we want to use in a purchase order and added it to the calculation schema.
condition type:
Application BBP
Source system LOCAL
Usage PR
Condition Type ZRBT
Access Seq. 01CT
Condition class discount
Calculat. Type fixed amount
Condit.category
Rounding rule commercial
manual has priority
item level
delete
amount/percent
UoM
Scale Base Type quantity
Check stat none
Max. No. Dimens no scales
We see the condition type and can choose it in the transaction which is used to create a po.
But when we choose it from the drop-down box it isn't added to the calculation.
Regards,
SvenHello Sven,
Thank you very much for posting the OSS note solution for your issue.
I had similar issue and finally was able to resolve it after reading your post.
regards
Vinod -
How to hide the pricing conditions specified in pricing procedure of sd.
dear friends,
my situation is to hide the conditions specified in the pricing procedure. so that it is not viewed by the some users.can you please tell me how to hide the conditions. so some of the persons, who are having authorization to see the conditions , will be able to see the pricing conditions.
can you please suggest me how to do this.
regards,
g.v.shivakkumarAuthorisation issues viz. Role Impementations
Hide Condition Records Line Item & Header Wise from all the transactions QK / So / P.I. / Enquiry / Invoice etc. for specific user grps. - in CRETATE / AMEND / DISPLAY / REPORTS all
Only Display the fields
regards,
g.v.shivakkumar -
Sales order: How to add pricing conditions at item level in BDC of VA01
Hello Experts,
Am writing BDC for sales order, in this process I need to add ITEM PRICING CONDITIONS, so, am selecting item and pressing the DOLLAR symbol button and am adding the conditions by pressing PLUS button in loop!! but am getting this erorr- Field KOMV-KMEIN (2) is not an input field!! when I execute it in we19-BACK GROUND only!! if I execute the same CODE IN we19-Fore ground, I dont have any issue!! I checked this SDN (field status in config), Google, but did not helped me!
Pls. let me know is there any other way to add conditions at item level in VA01 in BDC code?
THank youHi,
It is happening because the second row of the item level data screen is becoming display only. Please check whether In foreground mode you are pressing an extra enter to give data in the second row of the item level data after giving data in the first row and in BDC recording you have not recorded that 'Enter'.
Regards,
Gargi -
Populating the bapi in retreiving the pricing condition
Hi guys,
given the ff data, how am i going to populate bapi_salesorder_simulate to retrieve the pricing condition?
Condition Table Field SAP Field
ABCD 907 Sales Org LIKP-VKORG
ABCD 907 Customer LIKP-KUNNR ABCD 907 Material LIPS-MATNR XYZW 855 Sales Org LIKP-VKORG
XYZW 855 Price Group KNVV-KONDA
XYZW 855 Material Group MARA-MATKL
XYZW 855 Duty Band MVKE-MVGR3
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
MarkHi Preet,
I am sorry that we are back to square one. I checked OSS and two OSS notes specifically mention that you cannot do anything with condition records if you are in a version lower than 4.7.
That leaves us with the option that I mentioned in your earlier posting which is to make config changes, and then write a small program to do repricing. That way all the sales orders will be repriced and based on the new configuration, the condition should disappear.
You can give points by clicking the yellow star sign at the header of a post. You can give one 10 points for the post solving your issue, two 6 points for very helpful answers and unlimited 2 points for helpful answers.
Regards,
Srinivas
Sorry forgot to mention the OSS notes. They are 593246 and 597970.
Message was edited by: Srinivas Adavi -
Error while creating a pricing condition record.
Hi
I am trying to use the Material Group 1 (MVGR1) field from the field catalog to create a pricing condition table(9 series). I was able to create the table with MVGR1 as one of the columns but when I try to maintain condition records in the table, System gives me the following error. I have maintained certain values in the config for material group1. there is neither F4 values for the field Material group nor I can type in config values of MVGR1 in that field. I am getting this error. Any help on how to get past this issue will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Object Material group 1 not provided with characteristic AS. (Note other fields!)
Message no. VK432
Diagnosis
The value entered in a field is not permitted.
System response
The system issues an error message.
Procedure
Check the entry and make the necessary corrections. Note any relationships between the individual fields. Entries in other fields may also be incorrect.
Example: There are two fields for maintaining the country and region. These fields are linked. The country chosen would be permitted if it were by itself. So would the region. But the region may not be in the the country chosen. In this case, an error message is issued. The country should then be corrected, not the region!
Edited by: Suraj Ramakrishnan on Dec 24, 2009 2:45 AMMessage no. VK432
Check note 750841
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Error while debugging a FM to get pricing condition details
Hi,
when debugging the FM PRC_PD_HEAD_SHOW ( SPC_GET_PRICING_CONDITIONS ) to get the pricing condition details i am getting an error java debugging back end on sapdevsystem is waiting for port 8003.
Is this bcoz java not properly installed in my system. Can anybody pls tell me how to solve this issue.
Thanks,
LeenaDid not get any answer.. so found all the dates by particular tables a*** from pricing.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to specify The Language in Which Siebel Installers and Wizards Run
Hi, Yes (i think) i have read all about it in the manuals, but cannot find the solution to my problem :-( I am currently installing Siebel SBA 8.1.1.0 on a Windows 2003 SP2 server. This server has the following regional and language settings; - regio
-
Hello All With the given need from the market to manage license compliance proactively - the givven toolsets from MS SCCM 2012 should be capable of handling the given complexity. (reference 27 processes out of SAM ISO 19.770-1:2012 Where can I find t
-
What do i put in a manifest file?
I forgot, what is the format for a manifest file, is it MainClass=<Class with main> ?
-
Are sticky notes compatible with Cloud RDS 2012 R2 Server?
Greetings tech wizards. We are running an RDS 2012 R2 Server in the Cloud, and I would like to pose a question: is the default windows sticky notes application compatible in a Cloud environment? Multiple users would be using the application at the
-
Character palette not showing type preview – CS5.5 (Mac)
Hello, I had a problem that appeared literally out of nowhere with Illustrator CS5.5 on the Mac – I've been running 10.9.5 without issue until now when the contextual menu that usually shows a preview of the fonts available stopped showing all but tw