Problem in dropdown by index in table

Hi all,
i have created one table with dropdownby Index field .
In DISPLAY....i am able to get all values corresponding to the selection.In debugging i am getting all entries for dropdown field but while display i am getting first DD value.
And in CREATE ....when i am selecting first value in DD field for 1st row and then selecting another value for 2nd row it is taking second value for all rows.means whatever i select...same value is populated in all DD field of rows.
Thanks
Kiran

>
kiran162 wrote:
> Sorry..i did not get you..so how can i set values for DDBI.I mean to say what i need to add in my code.Any specific statement to set index values??
>
> Thanks
> Kiran
nope, it has to be arranged in the context level. I suspect that you have problem there.
See for example the context structure.
node_sflight
      carrid
      connid
      node_booking (cardinality 0..n)
         sconnid
         sdate
         stext
node_sflight is binded to the tabple datasource property of the table.
you have a column booking with DDBI as cell_editor, bind this source property to the node_booking.
bind the text property to the one of the attribute in node_booking like stext.
You need to fill the data node_booking for every row in the node_sflight.

Similar Messages

Highlight dropdown by index in table control in FPM error

Hello,
I have a situation where I would like to point out to a user that they have to maintain a value in a dropdown field in a table control. I am trapping the error situation in the Process_Event method of the FPM in my component,
I would like to raise an FPM error to highlight this to the user. If I do this with a normal input field I can just pass the element and attribute that I want highlighting to the FPM error handler
eg:
wd_this->ao_fpm->mo_message_manager->report_bapiret2_message(
                            is_bapiret2 = ls_message-message_details
                            io_component = lo_component
                            io_element = ls_message-element
                            iv_attribute_name = ls_message-attribute_name ).
and the field is highlighted and linked to the error.
However, if the field is of a type dropdown by index, I can't seem to get it to highlight. I have tried passing the element that the dropdown text is bound to and the attribute/name of the text field, but this does not work. I even tried passing the child node name as the attribute, and the element as the parent element of the node holding the dropdown list - but unsuprisingly this doesn't work either.
Is there anyway to highlight/link a dropdown by index field to an FPM error message - or is this functionality currently unsupported? Or perhaps I am making a simple mistake somewhere?
Thanks for any suggestions!
Cheers,
Chris

Chris Paine wrote:
> Is there anyway to highlight/link a dropdown by index field to an FPM error message - or is this functionality currently unsupported? Or perhaps I am making a simple mistake somewhere?
hi Chris,
As far as i know this functionality is not supported.I have had the same problem earlier.

DropDown by Index in table control

Hi,
I'm using dropdown by index(i need different values for each row) in my table control and I have this problem:
I have this context binded to my table control:
TABLE_NODE (card. 0..n)
   - ATRIB1
   - ATRIB2
   - DROPDWN_NODE (card. 0..n sel. 0..1) - to this node dropdown by index is binded
        - VALUE
        - TEXT     <-- bind this attribute to Texts property
Dropdown is filled OK, but how to transfer selected dropdown value to ATRIB2? And then, if I have a value in ATRIB2, how to diplay correct text for user in dropdown?
Another thing is that I have 2 dropdowns by value in table and values of second depends on selected value in first. How should I refresh second dropdown by index when user change value in first?
Many thanks for reply.

I'm also facing the issue. Can u plz. share the source code.

How to populate table editor which has dropdown by index in a column

Hi Experts,
I have a table editor with 3 columns.
Column 1. DD By Index - Subjects
Column2: marks ( input field )
column3: Result ( text view)
On an action of button on top of the view, i am getting the data for column2 and 3 and populating the node but i am unable to populate the column 1 Dropdown by Index.
My Node looks like this:
Node_Parent
   Node_DD
      Subject_Text
   Marks
   Result
When i get the internal table for Node_parent i am not getting Node_dd in that, so i am populating Marks and Result. binding it.
again looping on lt_parent and binding the node_dd.
it works fine when there is one row in lt_parent, its going for dump when its more than 2 records.
What am i missing while binding the subnode Node_DD while looping?
Any clue is highly appreciated.
Note: I am not using Supply Function to populate the subnode.
Ajay
Edited by: ajay matam on Aug 1, 2011 12:40 PM

Hi,
Parent Node and Child node has cardinality 0 to N only.
I am getting the child node of the parent.
Lo_node_parent->get_child_node ( name = 'Node_dd' )
i am trying to bind an internal table to Lo_node_parent but i am getting a dump with error
"COMPONENTCONTRLLER.1.PARENT.2.NODE_DD.NODE_DD" does not exist.
Binding works when there is one record in Parent node
loop at lt_parent into ls_parent.
binding the child node
endloop.
above thing works fine when there is one record, but when there are more than 1 record i am getting the above error.
Ajay
Edited by: ajay matam on Aug 1, 2011 1:40 PM

Problem with a 2 columns Range Partitioning for a indexed organized table

have an indexed organized table with a 2 column PK. the first field (datum) is a date field the second field (installatieid) is a number(2) field.
Every minute a 7 records are inserted (installatieid 0-6).
I like to partition this table with one partition per year per installatieid.
I tried to do it with:
partition by range(datum,installatieid)
(partition P_2004_0 values less than (to_date('2004-01,'yyyy-mm'),1)
,partition P_2004_6 values less than (to_date('2004-01','yyyy-mm'),7)
partition P_2005_0 values less than (to_date('2005-01','yyyy-mm'),1)
,partition P_2005_6 values less than (to_date('2005-01','yyyy-mm'),7)
but now only the P_2004_0 and P_2005_0 are filled.
I thought about to combine a range partition on datum with a list subpartition on installatieid, but I read this is not allowed with an index organized table.
How can I solve this problem.

partition by range(datum,installatieid)
(partition P_2004_0 values less than
(to_date('2004-01,'yyyy-mm'))
,partition P_2004_6 values less than
(to_date('2004-07','yyyy-mm'))
partition P_2005_0 values less than
(to_date('2005-01','yyyy-mm'))
,partition P_2005_6 values less than
(to_date('2005-07','yyyy-mm'))
? Sorry haven't got time to test it this morning ;0)

DropDown by index not clearing previous values

Dropdown by index issue.
I am having a problem with my dropdown not clearing previous entries.
I have a webdynpro that has two views, main and appraisal. I can enter the appraisal view from the main. The appraisal view contains a drop down. At this point, I the dropdown appears to work correctly. However, if I then enter a second appraisal, the drop down displays the value from the previous entry. I tried clearing out the drop down in wddomodifyview, but that just cleared out the actual line of the previous selection in the drop down, so I removed that code.
Here is what I have done so far.
Under Context in the appraisal view, I have created a node named DD1_1 which contains the attributes rating and rtext.
I have created a Supply Function attached to it called DD_MAPPING1_1, which contains the following code:
method DD_MAPPING1_1 .
* create local data variable to access context information
Data: context_node type ref to if_wd_context_node.
* create table based on context structure
Data: it_rating type STANDARD TABLE OF if_appraisal=>element_DD1_1,
wa_rating like line of it_rating.
clear wa_rating.
wa_rating-rating = ' '. wa_rating-rtext = ' '.
append wa_rating to it_rating.
wa_rating-rating = '1'. wa_rating-rtext = 'Below Expectations'.
append wa_rating to it_rating.
wa_rating-rating = '2'. wa_rating-rtext = 'Met Expectations (low)'.
append wa_rating to it_rating.
wa_rating-rating = '3'. wa_rating-rtext = 'Met Expectations (medium)'.
append wa_rating to it_rating.
wa_rating-rating = '4'. wa_rating-rtext = 'Met Expectations (high)'.
append wa_rating to it_rating.
wa_rating-rating = '5'. wa_rating-rtext = 'Exceeded Expectations'.
append wa_rating to it_rating.
context_node = wd_context->get_child_node( name = 'DD1_1').
context_node->BIND_TABLE( it_rating ).
endmethod.
I feel I am missing something, but seeing this is my first time attempting a dropdown, I am not certain what.
Any assistance would be appreciated.

I have tried this code in the inbound plug handler:
DATA lo_nd_dd1_1 TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_node.
DATA lo_el_dd1_1 TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_element.
* navigate from <CONTEXT> to <DD1_1> via lead selection
lo_nd_dd1_1 = wd_context->get_child_node( name = wd_this->wdctx_dd1_1 ).
* get element via lead selection
lo_el_dd1_1 = lo_nd_dd1_1->get_element( ).
clear lo_el_dd1_1.
lo_nd_dd1_1->set_lead_selection(
element = lo_el_dd1_1
and the program is bombing out with the message
Invalid index 0 when setting lead selection; context node: APPRAISAL.1.DD1_1
Should I be using set_lead_selection_index?
Thank you for all your help.
Edited by: Ed Left on May 19, 2010 5:25 PM

Creation of context index on index-organized table

I encountered a problem when creating a domain index(intermediate text context index) on a index-organised table in oracle 8i.
The description of the error is stated below:
"ORA-29866: cannot create domain index on a column of index-organized table "
I have configured intermediate text properly and even it worked for those tables which are not index-organised(ordinary tables).
This problem has occured only when i made the tables as index organised.
Please provide us a solution to this problem as early as possible.
In case if you require any more details i shall provide them.

Please ask questions about Oracle Text (formerly interMedia text) in the Oracle Text forum. You will get a quicker, more expert answer there.

Creation of context index on index-organized tables

I encountered a problem when creating a domain index(intermediate text context index) on a index-organised table in oracle 8i.
The description of the error is stated below:
"ORA-29866: cannot create domain index on a column of index-organized table "
I have configured intermediate text properly and even it worked for those tables which are not index-organised(ordinary tables).
This problem has occured only when i made the tables as index organised.
Please provide us a solution to this problem as early as possible.
In case if you require any more details i shall provide them.

creation of domain indexes (such as context) on iot's
is not currently supported in oracle.

Creation of secondary indexes for table "RSBATCHCTRL_PAR" failed

Hi ,
We have installed EHP1 on our BI7.0 system successfully, later we are trying to apply SPS01 for this EHP but we got the follwoing error during TBATG conversion.
2 EGT092 Conversion of table "RSBATCHCTRL_PAR" was restarted
2 EGT241 The conversion is continued at step "6"
2 EGT246 Type of conversion: "T" -> "T"
2 EGT240XBegin step "RSBATCHCTRL_PAR-STEP6":
4 EGT281 sql:
4 ED0314 CREATE
4 ED0314 INDEX [RSBATCHCTRL_PAR~DB] ON [RSBATCHCTRL_PAR]
4 ED0314 ( [JOBNAME] ,
4 ED0314 [JOBCOUNT] ,
4 ED0314 [SERVER] ,
4 ED0314 [HOST] ,
4 ED0314 [WP_NO] ,
4 ED0314 [WP_PID] ,
4 ED0314 [PROCESS_TYPE] )
4 ED0314 WITH ( ONLINE=OFF )
4 ED0314 ON [PRIMARY]
2 ED0314 Line 1: Incorrect syntax near '('.
3 EDA093 "DDL time(___1):" ".........6" milliseconds
2EEGT236 The SQL statement was not executed
2EEDI006 Index " " could not be created completely in the database
2EEGT221 Creation of secondary indexes for table "RSBATCHCTRL_PAR" failed
2EEGT239 Error in step "RSBATCHCTRL_PAR-STEP6"
2 EGT253XTotal time for table "RSBATCHCTRL_PAR": "000:00:00"
2EEGT094 Conversion could not be restarted
2 EGT067 Request for "RSBATCHCTRL_PAR" could not be executed
1 ED0327XProcess..................: "ferrari_12"
1 ED0302X=========================================================================
1 ED0314 DD: Execution of Database Operations
1 ED0302 =========================================================================
1 ED0327 Process..................: "ferrari_12"
1 ED0319 Return code..............: "0"
1 ED0314 Phase 001................: < 1 sec. (Preprocessing of TBATG)
1 ED0314 Phase 002................: < 1 sec. (Partitioning)
1 ED0309 Program runtime..........: "< 1 sec."
1 ED0305 Date, time...............: "03.06.2009", "12:47:21"
1 ED0318 Program end==============================================================
1 ETP166 CONVERSION OF DD OBJECTS (TBATG)
1 ETP110 end date and time : "20090603124721"
1 ETP111 exit code : "8"
1 ETP199 ######################################
System properties:
SAP - BI7.0 with EHP1
Database - MSSQL 2000
OS - Windows2003
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance,
Pavan.

> We have installed EHP1 on our BI7.0 system successfully, later we are trying to apply SPS01 for this EHP but we got the follwoing error during TBATG conversion.
> 2 ED0314 Line 1: Incorrect syntax near '('.
> 3 EDA093 "DDL time(___1):" ".........6" milliseconds
> 2EEGT236 The SQL statement was not executed
This is a known problem with SQL Server 2000, see
Note 1180553 - Syntax error 170 during index creation on SQL 2000
I highly suggest upgrading to SQL Server 2005 or 2008.
Markus

Creation of indexes in tables

SAP 4.7 6.20 Oracle 10g Windows Server 2003
Our SAP system was based on SQL.
Last month it was changed to Oracle 10g.
We really have a lot of developments ( Z programs ), and it's normal for us to create indexes some times.
But I don't know if we are supposed to change our habits from now on because of Oracle.
I have 2 questions :
1) Is the creation of indexes in tables so effective in Oracle as it was for SQL databases ?
2) When I create an index, Am I supposed to use the field MANDT as part of the index ?
Eduardo

Hi,
We are on Oracle 10.2.4.0 .My answers for point
1. Ensure that oracle patches are up-to-date. Also oracle parameters are set correctly.There is one S-note(do not remember right now) which has script file which you can run on your system to find if oracle parameters are set according to recommendation.
2. Mandt can be used in Z programs.Not a problem.
For future: Analyze Expensive SQl statements with the help of St03N and St04 for next2-3 months and tune them.
Does it help

How to Populate a Dropdown field for a table control with different keys

Hi All,
I have Table control with abt eight columns (fields). Out of these eight field one field is with dropdown list. In table control Project ID is Primary key column. Depending upon this Project ID value, i have different values which is to be populated in dropdown boxes. In table control if there is only one project ID value say 'P000715' i can populate it but when i have more than one project ID (P000715, p000716, P000717.....) in display in rows of table control i want to have different values in my dropdown field corresponding to that row of project id. Experts please tell me how to achieve this functionality.
Thankx in Advance
Rizwan Ahmad Siddiqui

The only way you may be able to do this is using
MODULE PROCESS ON VALUE-REQUEST. User-programmer F4 help
in your PAI routine.
In this routine you would build the list and get the returned value to update the field.
Something like this.
DATA: BEGIN OF value_tab OCCURS 0,
    field1 TYPE zlmltype,
    field2 TYPE zltypex,
END OF value_tab.
* Drop down values
REFRESH it_return_tab. CLEAR it_return_tab.
REFRESH value_tab. CLEAR value_tab.
SELECT ltype ltypex
    INTO TABLE value_tab
    FROM zlmltyp
    WHERE auth NE '9'.    "System Only
CALL FUNCTION 'F4IF_INT_TABLE_VALUE_REQUEST'
       EXPORTING
            retfield   = 'FIELD1'
            value_org = 'S'
       TABLES
            value_tab = value_tab[]
            return_tab = it_return_tab.
READ TABLE it_return_tab INDEX 1 INTO wa_return_tab.
CHECK sy-subrc EQ 0.
p_pleadtyp = wa_return_tab-fieldval.

Performance problem because of ignored index

Hi,
We have a performance problem with kodo ignoring indexes in Oracle:
Our baseclass of all our persistent classes (LogasPoImpl) has a subclass
CODEZOLLMASSNAHMENIMPL.
We use vertical mapping for all subclasses and have 400.000 instances of
CODEZOLLMASSNAHMENIMPL.
We defined an additional index on an attribute of CODEZOLLMASSNAHMENIMPL.
A query with a filter like "myIndexedAttribute = 'DE'" takes about 15
seconds on Oracle 8.1.7.
Kodo logs something like the following:
[14903 ms] executing prepstmnt 6156689 SELECT (...)
FROM CODEZOLLMASSNAHMENIMPL t0, LOGASPOIMPL t1
WHERE (t0.myIndexedAttribute = ?)
AND t1.JDOCLASS = ?
AND t0.JDOID = t1.JDOID
[params=(String) DE, (String)
de.logas.zoll.eztneu.CodeZollMassnahmenImpl] [reused=0]
When I execute the same statement from a SQL-prompt, it takes that long as
well, but when I swap the tablenames in the from part
(to "FROM LOGASPOIMPL t1, CODEZOLLMASSNAHMENIMPL t0") the result comes
immediately.
I've had a look at the query plans, oracle creates for the two statements
and found, that our index on myIndexedAttribute is not used
by the first statement, but it is by the second.
How can I make Kodo use the faster statement?
I've tried to use the "jdbc-indexed" tag, but without success so far.
Thanks,
Wolfgang

Thank you very much, Stefan & Alex.
After computing statistics the index is used and the performance is fine
now.
- Wolfgang
Alex Roytman wrote:
ANALYZE TABLE MY_TABLE COMPUTE STATISTICS;
"Stefan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:btlqsj$f18$[email protected]..
When I execute the same statement from a SQL-prompt, it takes that longas
well, but when I swap the tablenames in the from part
(to "FROM LOGASPOIMPL t1, CODEZOLLMASSNAHMENIMPL t0") the result comes
immediately.
I've had a look at the query plans, oracle creates for the twostatements
and found, that our index on myIndexedAttribute is not used
by the first statement, but it is by the second.
How can I make Kodo use the faster statement?
I've tried to use the "jdbc-indexed" tag, but without success so far.I know that in DB2 there is a function called "Run Statistics" which you
can (and should do) on all tables involved in a query (at least once a
month, when there are heavy changes in the tables).
On information gathered by this statistics DB2 can optimize your queries
and execution path's
Since I was once involved in query performance optimizing on DB/2 I can
say you can get improvements of 80% on big tables on which statistics are
run and not. (Since the execution plans created by the optimizer differ
heavily)
Since I'm working now with Oracle as well, at least I can say, that Oracle
has a featere like statistics as well. (go into the manager enterprise
Console and click on a table, you will find a row "statisitics last run")
I don't know how to trigger these statistics nor whether they would
influence the query execution path on oracle (thus "swapping" tablenames
by itself), since I didn't have time to do further research on thatmatter.
But it's worth a try to find out and maybe it helps on you problem ?

Finding Parent Table of Index Organized Table

I am using Oracle 10g Rel 2 and faced error message while granting select priviliges ORA-25191: cannot reference overflow table of an index-organized table
I searched solution and found: Issue the statement against the parent index-organized table containing the specified overflow table.
Question is how can i find parent index-organized table containing the specified overflow table.
Further i faced an other error while granting select priviliges : ORA-22812: cannot reference nested table column's storage table
Solution is same and i found parent table and first granted select priviliges on that parent table and then tried then tried to grant select priviliges on required table to public and did not worked.
if some body could help me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And just what does this problem have to do with either the SQL and/or PL/SQL languages?
Try the [url http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=61&start=0]Community Discussion Forums » Database » Database - General forum.
Also suggest that you read up on just what an IOT is, and where and when overflows apply. See the [url http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/schema.htm#sthref1060]Oracle® Database Concepts guide.

Is Index organization tables better in performance compare to normal tables

Hi,
i am using oracle 10g and my domain is on telecom.
my requirement is when 'A' party calls 'B' Party based on 'B' party number
we have to find which area the call lands based on that tariff will be applied
but the data configured in Area table is not the complete number its just a CC+NDC(4or5 digits in length)
so i have to find which one matches the nearest to 'B' party number.
i uses the following query
select max(area_code)
from ZONE_AREA
where '9888123456' like AREA_CODE||'%'
and network_id=1;
this is the structure of the table
create table ZONE_AREA(
AREA_CODE VARCHAR2(20),
AREA_NAME VARCHAR2(30) not null,
ZONE_CODE VARCHAR2(10) not null,
CALL_TYPE VARCHAR2(1) not null,
NETWORK_ID NUMBER(2),
primary key (NETWORK_ID, AREA_CODE))
the table contains around 200000 rows.
the data in table look like
AREA_CODE
98812
90020
900
9732
the hit ratio for the above query is massive since it fires for every call but my DBA complaining me
this query utilizes more CPU need to be tuned.
i thought of going for Index organization tables since i never used this but want to give a try to see any improvisation is there
Hence i created the Index organization table(IOT) for the same above structure in my development environment
with 60,000 rows in it.
create table ZONE_AREA_IOT
AREA_CODE VARCHAR2(20),
AREA_NAME VARCHAR2(30) not null,
ZONE_CODE VARCHAR2(10) not null,
CALL_TYPE VARCHAR2(1) not null,
NETWORK_ID NUMBER(2),
CONSTRAINT pk_admin_docindex1 PRIMARY KEY (NETWORK_ID, AREA_CODE))
ORGANIZATION INDEX
also the plain table (ZONE_AREA) have 60,000 rows in my development server.
now i fired the query on my plain table
select max(area_code)
from ZONE_AREA
where '9888123456' like AREA_CODE||'%'
and network_id=1;
the following is the execution plan
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 11 | 3 (34)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 11 | | |
| 2 | FIRST ROW | | 1 | 11 | 3 (34)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN (MIN/MAX)| SYS_C007738 | 1 | 11 | 3 (34)| 00:00:01 |
now i fired the query on the newly created IOT table
select max(area_code)
from ZONE_AREA_IOT
where '9888123456' like AREA_CODE||'%'
and network_id=1;
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 25 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 25 | | |
| 2 | FIRST ROW | | 21 | 525 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN (MIN/MAX)| PK_ADMIN_DOCINDEX1 | 21 | 525 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
both tables have similar record count
but the plans differ don't under stand the Rows column in the above plans for normal table its shows 11 bytes
for IOT table it shows 525 bytes why this difference ?
also CPU cost shows 3 in normal table and for IOT it shows 2
for the above scenario is IOT table is advisable will it cut down the CPU cost is any overheads there for using IOT
please respond
regards
naveen

I think you are deviating from the real problem.
I'm also in Telecom domain and what you are talking about is what is called "most matching" algorithm.
Practically suppose that party A calls party B and you want to know which is the tariff to apply.
Usually tariff tables are based on this "most matching" criteria where the correct tariff is the most matching with the called number.
Let me give you an example.
Suppose that I have a tariff table in this way:
WITH mytariff AS
   SELECT '90123' destination, 1.5 tariff_per_min FROM DUAL UNION ALL
   SELECT '9012' destination, 1.6 tariff_per_min FROM DUAL UNION ALL
   SELECT '901'   destination, 1.7 tariff_per_min FROM DUAL UNION ALL
   SELECT '90'    destination, 1.8 tariff_per_min FROM DUAL UNION ALL
   SELECT '55123' destination, 1.0 tariff_per_min FROM DUAL UNION ALL
   SELECT '5512' destination, 1.1 tariff_per_min FROM DUAL UNION ALL
   SELECT '551'   destination, 1.2 tariff_per_min FROM DUAL UNION ALL
   SELECT '55'    destination, 1.3 tariff_per_min FROM DUAL
SELECT * FROM mytariff;
DESTINATION          TARIFF_PER_MIN
90123                           1.5
9012                            1.6
901                             1.7
90                              1.8
55123                             1
5512                            1.1
551                             1.2
55                              1.3
{code}
Correct me if I'm wrong:
{code}
if party A dials 901234567 then it will match destination 90123 and tariff_per_min 1.5
if party A dials 901244567 then it will match destination 9012 and tariff_per_min 1.6
if party A dials 901344567 then it will match destination 901   and tariff_per_min 1.6
if party A dials 551244567 then it will match destination 5512 and tariff_per_min 1.1
etc.
{code}
Confirm if this is your criteria in finding the tariff.
The billing/rating systems I know usually store this information in database tables but the rating engine (generally a c++ program in Unix) is normally reading this information once, putting them in memory and rating the calls by reading information in memory.
I'm not saying that this is the only approach but it seems the most used.
In your case, It looks that you are using to do the same thing SQL or PL/SQL and definitely I understand that applying this algorithm by reading the tariff table for each call records is going to affect your performances heavily.
I have a couple of questions for your:
1) Are you using a SQL statement or a PL/SQL procedure to rate your calls?
2) Could you show us how you assign the tariff to your calls?
I don't think using IOT will solve your problem. IOT has the advantage to read the data together with the index and it is suitable especially if you read your data always with a certain key.
If your data about tariff is static, or doesn't change so often, which I suppose it the case, you could consider a different approach like loading them in a collection in PL/SQL and them retrieving them from collection. It might not be the optimal solution but it is worth considering it.
In order to evaluate your problem please give the details mentioned above.
Regards.
Al

Indexes on Index Organized Table

I remember seeing a note regarding problems in using indexs on index organized tables. Of course, the index would be something other than the one implied in the table definition. I can't seem to remember what the problem was.
Has anyone used indexes on index organized tables successfully? (unsuccessfully?)
Oracle 8i on a Tru64 platform
Thanks
-dave

I remember seeing a note regarding problems in using indexs on index organized tables. Of course, the index would be something other than the one implied in the table definition. I can't seem to remember what the problem was.
Has anyone used indexes on index organized tables successfully? (unsuccessfully?)
Oracle 8i on a Tru64 platform
Thanks
-dave

Problem in dropdown by index in table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for