Problem installing 9.2.0.8 patch set noninteractively

I am attempting to automate the installation of the Oracle 9i client on a Windows XP platform. The client will include the 9.2.0.1 base client with the 9.2.0.8 patch set applied to it. The silent installation of the base client works as it should. Then I initiate the installation of the Patch Set with the command
z:\Patches\Server9208\Disk1\Install\Setup.exe -silent -waitforcompletion -responsefile z:\rspfiles\patch9208.rsp
where patch9208.rsp is a copy of the response file distributed with the patch set and modified for our organization. The OUI opens properly and transfers control to the background task. All requested products are installed. However, at the end of the installation, I am presented with a request to “Please press Enter to exit…”. Is there any way to automate the response to this message or suppress the message. We do not want to require any user response when we distribute the Oracle client to the
PC’s.

Hm, can you try adding the -nowait option?

Similar Messages

Can i install 10.2.0.4 patch set 14 on my client when SERVER is at 10.2.0.4

======================================================
Can i install 10.2.0.4 patch set 14 on my client when SERVER is at 10.2.0.4 patchset 5?
======================================================
We have a customer with DB on windows-2003 64 bit with following homes.
At Server version:-
DB version is 10.2.0.4 patchset 5,
client1 is at 10.2.0.1.(patchset i am not sure)
Client2 is at 10.2.0.4 patchset 5.
Customer running some sqls which are taking more time from CLIENT2(10.2.0.4 patchset5) than CLIENT1(10.2.0.1). offcourse both CLIENTS connecting
same DB. we identified a bug(6350579). This bug was resolved in 10.2.0.4 patch 14(7677781).
Now my question is Can i apply this patch only at client side with out applying at DB level?
I mean i will create one more new client called CLINET3 (with 10.2.0.4 and i will install 10.2.0.4 patchset14) and then run the SQLs from new client CLIENT3. is this supported method or not?
Reason being customer does not want to install 10.2.0.4 patchset14 at DB since Customer is happy with DB performance.
We are getting problem only when we connect to DB from cleint 10.2.0.4 patchset5. if we connect to DB from Client 10.2.0.1, SQL performance is very good.
Please advise me on this.
Regards
Nagendra.

You can upgrade your client with the latest patchset/bug fix (if you have tested it on some other machine and found that your issue has been resolved) but be prepared to handle any unusual errors that might arise due to this combination.
Personally, I never prefer having a client running at a higher version than the server but there are some situations where we need to and we need to make sure that, even though Oracle must have tested certain scenarios, we do not run into errors. So test, test and test before changing anything in production.
Edited by: Satish Kandi on Feb 9, 2009 6:26 PM
Revised a bit.

10.2.0.2 Patch set noninteractively , OUI-10133

Dear all,
I tried to install the 10.2.0.2 Patch Set Noninteractively,
I ran runInstaller:
./runInstaller -silent -responseFile /app/patch/p45478
17_10202_LINUX/Disk1/response/patchset.rsp
and then I received:
SEVERE: OUI-10133:Invalid staging area. There are no top level components for Linux available for installation in this staging area.
INFO: User Selected: Yes/OK
INFO: Performing operation for OUI Shiphome access setup
SEVERE:OUI-10133:Invalid staging area. There are no top level components for Linux available for installation in this staging area.
What does it mean?
Regards,
Maria

Yes, you can. Choose a plateform where the 10.2.0.4 patchset version is the based released (MacOSX, Vista or Windows 2008), install it, create a new db, then export your source 10.2.0.1 db, and import into this new one.
Nicolas.
PS: of course, if you want only the patchset to upgrade your db in place, then the answer is shorter : no.
Edited by: N. Gasparotto on Aug 11, 2009 10:51 AM

Problems installing SAP GUI 7.1 patch level 4 for Bex Analyzer

Hi all,
I have a problem installing the SAP GUI for BW - running office 2003, have tried to install without success. The old Bex tools seem to work, but not the new ones and when opening any of the tools report designer or web application designer I get the error : System configured incorrectly. The new functionality in Bex Analyzer do not respond when clicking on the icons.
Thanks,
Dirko

Hello
please download the compialtion 3 cd of sapgui 710.
http://service.sap.com/installations
Entry by Application Group
SAP Frontend Components
SAP GUI FOR WINDOWS
SAP GUI FOR WINDOWS 7.10 CORE
Installation
Compilation 3 cd is delivered with the sapgui patch level 11!
Also the sapgui patche you can find in
http://service.sap.com/patches
Best Regards
Sven

Problem running Sample Application after intalling patch set 4.0.2.00.07

We just applied the patch set 4.0.2.00.07 on our TEST environment APEX4.0.
Now I can't run the sample application. When I run the application, login using either the admin or the demo user with the #lower_case_workspace_name#", the browser is generating below error message:
ORA-06550: line 2, column 8: PLS-00201: identifier 'CUSTOM_AUTH' must be declared ORA-06550: line 2, column 1: PL/SQL: Statement ignored
Error ERR-10460 Unable to run authentication credential check function.
The sample application works fine on our DEV environment APEX 4.0.0.00.46 *without* the patch set 4.0.2.00.07.
Does anyone have an idea how to resolve this
Thanks

Varad -
I see that these functions are missing on the TEST environment parsing schema. I will have our DBA rectify the issue.
Thanks,
DP

Enterprise Manager not working after installed 10.2.0.4 Patch Set 6810189

I installed the 6810189 patch for Windows 32-bit and now I can't bring up Enterprise Manager (I don't have Grid Control, just plain jane EM). Any ideas on why this would be?
Thanks,
ivalum21

Haha, yeah it was running. I did the EMCTL STATUS DBCONSOLE command, and it gave me the web address for EM, so I used that and it is working.
Apparently it uses "https" now and not "http."
Does anyone know, did Oracle change that for 10.2.x? I didn't realize EM used a secure connection...
ivalum21
Edited by: ivalum21 on Sep 3, 2008 3:48 PM

CPUs and Patch Set Updates

hi,
if somebody can help me clarify on what security patches should be installed for Audit Vault.
I have installed 10.2.3 and patch set 10.2.3.1
CPUOct2009 specifies the following:
+ Critical Patch Updates are applied only on the base release version, for example 10.2.0.4.0
+ Patch Set Updates can be applied on the base release version or on any earlier Patch Set Update. For example, 10.2.0.4.2 can be applied on 10.2.0.4.1 and 10.2.0.4.0
+ Once a Patch Set Update has been applied, the recommended way to get future security content is to apply subsequent Patch Set Updates. Reverting from an applied Patch Set Update back to the Critical Patch Update, while technically possible, requires significant time and effort, and is not advised.
So for Audit Vault, is 10.2.3 considered the base release version, or 10.2.3.1?
Should i install Patches 6914302 and 7240123 (indicated in Table 5 of CPUOct2009) ?
or are we covered security-wise and just wait for 10.2.3.2?
thank you!

Given the security and auditing nature of this product please put this question to Oracle via an SR at metalink.
This is one area where taking advice from strangers is not appropriate ... even if they are Oracle ACE Directors and such.

Problem in installing patch set 8.1.7.4

Hi All,
when i am installing patch set 8.1.7.4 i am getting stuck here like it is not able to file link the binaries can i know what is the reason
when i tailed install log i am getting below error.
/usr/ccs/bin/make -f ins_net_client.mk client_sharedlib ORACLE_HOME=/meta01/app/oracle/product/8.1.7
/meta01/app/oracle/product/8.1.7/bin/genclntsh
when i tailed installlog.err log
Error in deleting /meta01/app/oracle/product/8.1.7/rdbms/lib64/config.c

Error in deleting /meta01/app/oracle/product/8.1.7/rdbms/lib64/config.cIt has been so long since I worked with V8 that I can't recall whether or not a 64-bit version existed.
What OS name & version produced this error?

Error when installing 9.0.1.4.0 patch set for the Oracle Database Server.

Hi to all.
Currently, i am trying to install patches for portal server.
The server OS is Sun Solaris 8.
We are using Oracle9iAS.
Now, we are installing 9.0.1.4.0 patch set for the Oracle Database Server.
We managed to install the patch, but have problem with the Post Install Action.
We managed to run
-ALTER SYSTEM ENABLE RESTRICTED SESSION;
-@rdbms/admin/catpatch.sql
-ALTER SYSTEM DISABLE RESTRICTED SESSION;
-CONNECT / AS SYSDBA
-update obj$ set status=5 where type#=29 and owner#!=0;
-commit;
But, when we come to the next command, which is to shutdown, it gives us like
this..
SQL> update obj$ set status=5 where type#=29 and owner#!=0;
1402 rows updated.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> shutdown immediate
Database closed.
Database dismounted.
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-01219: database not open: queries allowed on fixed tables/views only
We tried to startup the database..it gives us this error..
SQL> startup
ORA-01081: cannot start already-running ORACLE - shut it down first
So, we tried to shutdown again..
SQL> shutdown immediate
ORA-01089: immediate shutdown in progress - no operations are permitted
I been informed that this is maybe a Database problem related. Any ideas?
Best Wishes,
Rushdan Md Saad.

Patchsets could be obtained (only) from http://metalink.oracle.com
You need to have valid CSI for access.
P.S: Sorry Werner, I didn't see you post.
Message was edited by:
Ivan Kartik

PL/SQL don't work after install Oracle 9204 patch set

I'm using Oracle 9.2.0.1.
some pl/sql don't work after i install database patch set 3 (9.2.0.4).
code--------------------------------
BEGIN
dbms_aqadm.stop_queue(
queue_name => 'WB_RT_SERVICE_QUEUE');
exception
when others
then
null;
END;
error message is: ora-03113 end-of-files on communication channel.
please help. thank you !!

Can you please tell me the soluation of this problem as I am also facing the similar problem ?
Thanks in advacne ?
Regards
Satpal

11.1.0.1.6 Patch Set Update problem

Hi guys!
I have problem with 11.1.0.1.6 Patch Set Update for Oracle Management Service.
After i have installed OMS on my RHEL 5.2 server together with agent (Repository is on remote host) i have decided to install recommended patches as well.
I have followed PSU install procedure, so i have first run
[oracle@gc ~]$ opatch lsinventory
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 11.1.0.9.6
Copyright (c) 2012, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Oracle Home : /opt/oracle/Middleware/oms11g
Central Inventory : /home/oracle/oraInventory
from : /opt/oracle/Middleware/oms11g/oraInst.loc
OPatch version : 11.1.0.9.6
OUI version : 11.1.0.8.0
Log file location : /opt/oracle/Middleware/oms11g/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2012-04-12_10-24-52AM_1.log
OPatch detects the Middleware Home as "/opt/oracle/Middleware"
Lsinventory Output file location : /opt/oracle/Middleware/oms11g/cfgtoollogs/opatch/lsinv/lsinventory2012-04-12_10-24-52AM.txt
Installed Top-level Products (1):
Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Console 11.1.0.1.0
There are 1 products installed in this Oracle Home.
Interim patches (3) :
Patch 13248190 : applied on Wed Apr 11 11:41:33 CEST 2012
Unique Patch ID: 14355092
Created on 12 Jan 2012, 03:49:58 hrs PST8PDT
Bugs fixed:
10122270, 9930146, 9836815, 8638231, 9963717, 9543582, 9276193, 9911851
9506062, 10361050, 10218699, 12657533, 10372559, 12908384, 10246310
10418856, 10313110, 9500255, 10100210, 9462098, 12799578, 9747671
10279457, 10400454, 9562462, 9570911, 11727299, 10638043, 9937784
7340407, 9575427, 10204587, 10177562, 9935898, 12833678, 11809598
9446422, 12545526, 9586285, 9548105, 10201753, 10353911, 9308029
9534200, 12669853, 9184007, 9684768, 9686658, 9341486, 10122223, 11683765
9241402, 9838084, 9849222, 9903280, 9888852, 9478844, 9558026, 9604064
11728549, 9342290, 10410743, 10020408, 9151748, 9953045, 9221090
9559264, 10264990, 10036568, 10065631, 9804442, 9576468, 10372513
10108019, 9928480, 9535382, 11726378, 10114291, 10278756, 9892455
9476313, 11900474, 9876632, 9386076, 12552334, 11076661, 9803798
10408402, 10043790, 10307099, 9965939, 9646681, 9390531, 9662869, 10333908
9544428, 9489355, 10190000, 9706552, 11890440, 8859562, 11808680, 12758241
8234692, 9723689, 9734399, 9504581, 9558551, 9874327, 9313608, 12423703
12360281, 12693879, 11901582, 12654105, 12536173, 10307544, 13248190
9537948, 8930257, 10118817, 11696545, 9919614, 10404792, 12734089
10636783, 9541036, 9821890, 12738517, 10270073, 10257014, 10223586
10213026, 9952713, 9491872, 9507363, 10015330, 9726686, 10042225
Patch 9367763 : applied on Tue Apr 10 14:03:38 CEST 2012
Unique Patch ID: 12252189
Created on 1 Mar 2010, 22:30:36 hrs PST8PDT
Bugs fixed:
9367763
Patch 9207217 : applied on Tue Apr 10 14:03:30 CEST 2012
Unique Patch ID: 12151251
Created on 27 Jan 2010, 15:49:36 hrs US/Pacific
Bugs fixed:
9207217
OPatch succeeded.
[oracle@gc ~]$ echo $PATH
:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/opt/oracle/agent11g/bin:/opt/oracle/oms11g/bin:/opt/oracle/Middleware/oms11g/bin:/opt/oracle/Middleware/oracle_common/OPatch
[oracle@gc ~]$ echo $ORACLE_HOME
/opt/oracle/Middleware/oms11g
after this checks i have stopped oms server and successfully executed opatch apply command.
Then next step is to connect to rcuJDBCEngine as SYSMAN and run the apply.sql script as follows (in my case):
[oracle@gc 13248190]$ pwd
/opt/InstallGrid/Oracle11g/11106_patch_32bit/13248190
[oracle@gc 13248190]$ /opt/oracle/Middleware/oms11g/bin/rcuJDBCEngine [email protected]:1521:gcoemrep JDBC_SCRIPT apply.sql $PWD $ORACLE_HOME
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 0
at java.lang.String.charAt(String.java:686)
at oracle.net.resolver.AddrResolution.resolveAndExecute(AddrResolution.java:386)
at oracle.net.ns.NSProtocol.establishConnection(NSProtocol.java:634)
at oracle.net.ns.NSProtocol.connect(NSProtocol.java:208)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CConnection.connect(T4CConnection.java:966)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CConnection.logon(T4CConnection.java:292)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.PhysicalConnection.<init>(PhysicalConnection.java:508)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CConnection.<init>(T4CConnection.java:203)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CDriverExtension.getConnection(T4CDriverExtension.java:33)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver.connect(OracleDriver.java:510)
at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:582)
at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:154)
at oracle.sysman.assistants.common.dbutil.jdbc.ConnectionFactory.createConnection(ConnectionFactory.java:259)
at oracle.sysman.assistants.common.dbutil.jdbc.ConnectionFactory.createConnection(ConnectionFactory.java:142)
at oracle.sysman.assistants.common.dbutil.jdbc.ConnectionHelper.getConnection(ConnectionHelper.java:61)
at oracle.sysman.assistants.common.dbutil.jdbc.JDBCEngine.getConnection(JDBCEngine.java:889)
at oracle.sysman.assistants.common.dbutil.jdbc.JDBCEngine.connect(JDBCEngine.java:417)
at oracle.sysman.assistants.common.dbutil.jdbc.JDBCEngine.main(JDBCEngine.java:1982)
maybe my variables are not good?
Any suggestions?
Edited by: rootsman on Apr 12, 2012 1:36 AM

Hi Rootsman,
There are 2 possible causes for this issue.
1. Because an incorrect syntax was used to apply the SQL part of the patch. If the password for the user is not added in the command line, the rcuJDBCEngine will fail. The rcuJDBCEngine will not prompt for the password (like sqlplus does), if it is not provided on the command line.
- Incorrect syntax
+$ORACLE_HOME/bin/rcuJDBCEngine sys@<host>:<port>:<SID> JDBC_SCRIPT post_install_script.sql $PWD $ORACLE_HOME+
- Correct syntax
+$ORACLE_HOME/bin/rcuJDBCEngine sys/<password for sys>@<host>:<port>:<SID> JDBC_SCRIPT post_install_script.sql $PWD $ORACLE_HOME+
2. This problem may also occur if the password has been supplied on the command line but includes some special characters.
The solution is to stick to the syntax described in the README.txt which states to enter the sys password on the command line:
+$ORACLE_HOME/bin/rcuJDBCEngine sys/<password for sys>@<host>:<port>:<SID> JDBC_SCRIPT post_install_script.sql $PWD $ORACLE_HOME+
If there are any special characters in the password, enclose the password in single-quotes ' '. For example:
+$ORACLE_HOME/bin/rcuJDBCEngine sys/'<password>'@<host>:<port>:<sid> JDBC_SCRIPT post_install_script.sql $PWD $ORACLE_HOME+
Hope your problem gets resolved.
Thanks,
Cris

Error while installing oracle patch set 10.2.0.4

Hi Gurus,
I am installed oracle 10G successfully but while installing oracle patch set 10.2.0.4. it is given the following error.
OUI.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close.
We are sorry for the convenience.
i am installing ECC6.0 on window xp SP3 platform.
Please give me solution ASAP.
Regards
Hemant Gade
Basis Consultant

Hi,
I have solved this issue my self.
It was purely windows registry error.
thanks for your help.
Regards
Hemant

Problem: installing Recommend Patch Cluster: patch 140900-10 fails

I don't know if this is correct location for this thread (admin/moderator move as required).
We have a number of Solaris x86 hosts (ie 4) and I'm trying to get the patched and up to date.
I obtained the latest Recommended Patch Cluster (dated 28Sep2010).
I installed it on host A yesterday, 2 hours 9 mins, no problems.
I tried to install it on host B today, and that was just a critical failure.
Host B failed to install 140900-01, because the non global zones rejected the patch because dependancy 138218-01 wasn't installed in the non global zones.
Looking closer, it appears that 138218-01 is for global zone installation only; so it makes sense that the non global zones rejected it.
However, both hosts were in single user mode when installing the cluster and both hosts have non global zones.
140900-01 installed on host A with log:
| This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
| version of a package which is already installed. This installation
| will attempt to overwrite this package.
|
| Dryrun complete.
| No changes were made to the system.
|
| This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
| version of a package which is already installed. This installation
| will attempt to overwrite this package.
|
|
| Installation of <SUNWcsu> was successful.
140900-1 failed on host B with this log:
| Validating patches...
|
| Loading patches installed on the system...
|
| Done!
|
| Loading patches requested to install.
|
| Done!
|
| Checking patches that you specified for installation.
|
| Done!
|
|
| Approved patches will be installed in this order:
|
| 140900-01
|
|
| Preparing checklist for non-global zone check...
|
| Checking non-global zones...
|
| Checking non-global zones...
|
| Restoring state for non-global zone X...
| Restoring state for non-global zone Y...
| Restoring state for non-global zone Z...
|
| This patch passes the non-global zone check.
|
| None.
|
|
| Summary for zones:
|
| Zone X
|
| Rejected patches:
| 140900-01
| Patches that passed the dependency check:
| None.
|
|
| Zone Y
|
| Rejected patches:
| 140900-01
| Patches that passed the dependency check:
| None.
|
|
| Zone Z
|
| Rejected patches:
| 140900-01
| Patches that passed the dependency check:
| None.
|
| Fatal failure occurred - impossible to install any patches.
| X: For patch 140900-01, required patch 138218-01 does not exist.
| Y: For patch 140900-01, required patch 138218-01 does not exist.
| Z: For patch 140900-01, required patch 138218-01 does not exist.
| Fatal failure occurred - impossible to install any patches.
| ----
| patchadd exit code : 1
| application of 140900-01 failed : unhandled subprocess exit status '1' (exit 1 b
| ranch)
| finish time : 2010.10.02 09:47:18
| FINISHED : application of 140900-01
It looks as if the patch strategy is completely different for the two hosts; both are solaris x86 (A is a V40z; B is a V20z).
Trying to use "-G" with patchadd crabs the patch is for global zones only and stops (ie it's almost as if it thinks installation is being attempted in a non global zone).
Without "-G" same behavior as patch cluster install attempt (no surprise there).
I have inherited this machines; I am told each of these machines were upgraded to Solaris 10u6 in June 2009.
Other than the 4-5 months it took oracle to get our update entitlement to us, we've had no problems.
I'm at a loss here, I don't see anyone else having this type of issue.
Can someone point the way...?
What am I missing...?

Well, I guess what you see isn't what you get.
Guess I'm used to the fact USENET just left things formatted the way they were :-O

Install the latest patch set for Oracle 10.2.0.4.0

I install SAP PI 7.1 EHP1 on Windows Server 2008 (RC1).
I already installed Oracle DB software 10.2.0.4.0
Now I would like to install the latest set for Oracle 10.2.0.4.0
I downloaded the following files from Service Marketplace:
- p8559467_10204_MS_WINX8664.zip
-p7592030_10204_WIN_GENERIC.zip
- Opatch_10204_Generic_v5.zip
- and 3 Patchset files (Patchset_10204MSWINX8664aa.bin, Patchset_10204MSWINX8664ab.bin, Patchset_10204MSWINX8664ac.bin )
Question:
1) What is the procedure/order to install the patch set?
2) Where (in which directory) should I put the 3 Patchset files and which commando should be used here (opathc apply)?
Thank you!

> - p8559467_10204_MS_WINX8664.zip
> -p7592030_10204_WIN_GENERIC.zip
> - Opatch_10204_Generic_v5.zip
> - and 3 Patchset files (Patchset_10204MSWINX8664aa.bin, Patchset_10204MSWINX8664ab.bin, Patchset_10204MSWINX8664ac.bin )
That one is for updates 10.2.0.<4 to 10.2.0.4. Since you are already on 10.2.0.4 that one is no more necessary.
> 1) What is the procedure/order to install the patch set?
> 2) Where (in which directory) should I put the 3 Patchset files and which commando should be used here (opathc apply)?
See Note 1137346 - Oracle 10.2.0: Patches/patch collections for Oracle 10.2.0.4
Basically you will
- patch Opatch
- unzip the patch to a directory where <sid>adm has access
- stop all Oracle Services
- then execute opatch apply
Markus

Problem installing Patch to upgrade to Sun One 6.1SP7

Hi,
About a year ago, we installed Sun One 6.1 SP6. When the application was installed, it was installed to a the non-default location. Instead of /opt/SUNWwbsrv directory, we chose to install it to /app/netscape61.
Now that SP7 is available, I'm having problems installing the patch.
When I use patchadd, it says it cannot find SUNWwbsrv installation so it quits.
I've tried "patchadd -M /tmp/116648-19 -R /app/netscape61"
Where /tmp/116648-19 is the source patch directory and /app/netscape61 is where I installed netscape61SP6.
Can someone tell me the correct syntax to use?
Thanks,
Bruce

Hi Bruce,
Did you install 6.1 SP6 using the packages or using the point product(non package based)? If you had installed 6.1 SP6 as a point product, then patchadd is not the way to upgrade. You can check by running the pkginfo command as follows:
# pkginfo SUNWwbsvr
If the above command fails with "not found" then you probably have the point product(non package based install) of WS installed. In that case, you can upgrade using the SP7 bits from here:
http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=45c90ca9
Hope it helps.
Thanks
Manish

Problem installing 9.2.0.8 patch set noninteractively

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for