Problem of performance with xerces?

I am to build a server which parse XML message with sax(xerces) but when i send very many message to it,the parsing is sometime very slow (10x slower for 1 of 20 messages sent).Is anybody have an explication?
(soory for my english :) )

Yes Xerces is slow when the node list gets longer and longer because it follows all the changes in the document. It also consumes memory.

Similar Messages

Problems of performance with jdeveloper

I've had problems of performance using Jdeveloper 10g when I'm using Swing/JClient for ADF. My computer is a Pentium IV with 1gb ram running under windows 2000 service pack 4. I'm trying Jdeveloper since version 3. I think Java still runs slowing. Can anyone help me ?

I you want us to help you, provide more details about what is slow.
Any specific action? how much time does it take to complete this specific action? etc...
Do you have an anti-virus running? try to disable it and see if it helps. Some anti-viruses check Java classes as they are loaded slowing down JDeveloper.

Performance with external display

Hello,
when I'm connecting my 19'' TFT to the MacBook the performance (with the same applications runnig) is realy bad. It tooks longer to switch between apps and if I don't use an app for some time, it can took up to 30 sec to "reactivate" the app.
Because the HD is working when I switch apps, it looks like the OS is swapping. My question: Would it help to upgrade the MacBook to 2GB ram? AFAIC the intel card uses shared memory.
Thanks for your help
Till
MacBook 1.83 GHz/1GB Mac OS X (10.4.8)

How much RAM do you have? Remember that the MB does not have dedicated VRAM like some computers do and that it uses the system RAM to drive the graphics chipset.
I use my MB with the mini-DVI to DVI adapter to drive a 20" widescreen monitor without any of the problems that you describe, but I have 2GB of RAM. If you only have the stock 512MB of RAM, that may be part of what you are seeing.

Performance with LinkedList in java

Hello All,
Please suggest me any solution to further improve the performance with List.
The problem description is as follows:
I have a huge number of objects, lets say 10,000 , and need to store the objects in such a collection so that if i want to store an object at some particular index i , I get the best performance.
I suppose as I need indexed based access, using List makes the best sense as Lists are ordered.
Using LinkedList over ArrayList gives the better performance in the aforementioned context.
Is there are way I can further improve the performance of LinkedList while solving this particular problem
OR
Is there any other index based collection using that i get better performance than LinkedList?
Thanks in advance

The trouble with a LinkedList as implemented in the Java libraries is that if you want to insert at index 100, it has no option but to step through the first 100 links of the list to find the insert point. Likewise is you retrieve by index. The strength of the linked list approach is lost if you work by index and the List interface gives no other way to insert in the middle of the list. The natural interface for a linked list would include an extended Iterator with methods for insert and replace. Of course LinkedLists are fine when you insert first or last.
My guess would be that if your habitual insertion point was half way or more through the list then ArrayList would serve you better especially if you leave ample room for growth. Moving array elements up is probably not much more expensive, per element, than walking the linked list. Maybe 150% or thereabouts.
Much depends on how you retrieve, and how volatile the list is. Certainly if you are a read-mostly situation and cannot use an iterator then a LinkedList won't suit.

Very Slow SMB Performance with DroboShare

Hi there,
We have a big issue with a DroboShare NAS device connected to a Drobo Drive (FAT32):
If we connect to our DroboShare NAS directly via LAN, the performance with SMB is terrible. Browsing folders takes minutes until the contents (15 items) are shown, opening and saving files takes minutes.
If we connect the Drobo via USB to one of our Macs and then share it via SMB, it is fast as ****.
Problem is that we cannot leave it this way, as we only have portable macs, so if they are removed, nobody can access the Drobo.
The problem nevertheless seems to be restricted to Macs: If we connect to the DroboShare with Linux or Windows Boxes, everything is as fast as expected.
Does anyone has similar issues with weak performance and/or knows how this can improved?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Simon

I just ported netatalk (AFP) over to the DroboShare.
http://code.google.com/p/drobocapsule/

PHP in Solaris 10 and Non-Global Zones: Problem of performance?

Hi friends
We are feeling a poor performance with applications developed with PHP in Solaris 10, with non-global and global zones, while Intel platform (Xeon and Pentium), performance is very good. Difference between both platforms is about 200% aprox, one second in Intel to 9, 12 or 20 seconds in Solaris depending of model.
Our tests were developed in:
1. SF T2000 server Solaris 10 global zone
2. SF T2000 server Solaris 10 non-global zone
3. SF280R server Solaris 10 non-global zone
4. V240 server with 1 GB memory, 1*US III-i 1.0 GHz and Solaris 9 (really this version for test and comparisons)
5. V240 server with 8GB memory, 2*US III-i 1.5Ghz and Solaris 9 (really this version for test and comparisons too)
Intel platforms were:
1. Intel Pentium 4 2GHz 2GB memory, Linux Fedora and PHP 4.4.4
2. Intel Xeon 2 core, 2.33GHz 2GB memory, Linux Fedora and PHP 4.4.3
Versions of products are:
1. Solaris 9 or Solaris 10
2. PHP 4.4.7 downloaded from http://www.php.net/downloads.php
3. Apache 2.0.59
4. MySQL 4.1.15-log
Our php compilation and installation were:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/php-4.4.7 \
--with-pear \
--with-openssl=/usr/local/ssl \
--with-gettext \
--with-ldap=/usr/local \
--with-iconv \
--enable-ftp \
--with-dom \
--with-mime-magic \
--enable-mbstring \
--with-zlib \
--enable-track-vars \
--enable-sigchild \
--disable-ctype \
--disable-overload \
--disable-tokenizer \
--disable-posix \
--with-gd \
--with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2.0.53/bin/apxs \
--with-mysql \
--with-pgsql \
--with-oci8=/oracle/product/9.2.0 \
--with-oracle=/oracle/product/9.2.0 \
--with-png-dir=/usr/local \
--with-zlib-dir=/usr/local \
--with-freetype-dir=/usr/local \
--with-jpeg-dir=/usr/local
make
make install
Questions:
Is there any problem of PHP with SunFire T2000 servers or 64-bits platforms?
Is there any flag of PHP would be use to compilarion PHP in 64-bits or multithread?
I wait for any comments or suggestions about our problem with PHP compilation and performance in Solaris 10. Thanks a lot.
Sergio.

I presume you compiled php on the Sun server, was this done using gcc or the Sun One C compiler.
If the latter then you can also use the flag: --enable-nonportable-atomics when you run configure

Hi there, I cannot open bridge and I get this warning, "Adobe Bridge Cannot be Opened because of a problem. Check with the developer to make sure Adobe Bridge CC works with this version of Mac OS X. You may need to reinstall any updates for this applicati

Hi there, I cannot open bridge and I get this warning, "Adobe Bridge Cannot be Opened because of a problem. Check with the developer to make sure Adobe Bridge CC works with this version of Mac OS X. You may need to reinstall any updates for this application and Mac OS X" although bridge has been running on my Mac for over a yera. I have installed all current updates for Mac and reinstalled Bridge again from CC and still get the same issue? Any advice?

Would you please provide details about your setup?
BOILERPLATE TEXT:
Note that this is boilerplate text.
If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand,
such as your platform (Mac or Win),
exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop (not just "CS6", but something like CS6v.13.0.6) and of Bridge,
your settings in Photoshop > Preference > Performance
the type of file you were working on,
machine specs, such as total installed RAM, scratch file HDs, total available HD space, video card specs, including total VRAM installed,
what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far,
what error message(s) you receive,
if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them,
if you're having printing issues, indicate the exact make and model of your printer, paper size, image dimensions in pixels (so many pixels wide by so many pixels high). if going through a RIP, specify that too.
etc.,
someone may be able to help you (not necessarily this poster).
a screen shot of your settings or of the image could be very helpful too.
Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
Thanks!

Extremely slow performance with Radeon HD 7870

Hi,
I am using a number of Adobe programs on my new Windows 8 64 bit system, with 16 gigs of ram, an Intel Core i5 2.67ghz, and AMD Radeon HD 7870 2 gig. All the programs (including After Effects and Illustrator) work very well with the exception of Photoshop CS6 64 bit, which has extremely slow performance with Use Graphics Processor enabled in my preferences (which Photoshop selects by default). If I turn off Use Graphics Processor, the slow performance vanishes. If I change Drawing Mode to Basic, there might be a slightly detectable improvement over Normal and Advanced, but it's still horribly slow. The refresh rate seems to be just a few frames per second. Everything is slow: brushes, zooming, panning, everything.
I've tried changing the settings I've seen suggested elsewhere: I switched Cache levels to 2, history states to 10, and tile size to 128k. No effect. Photoshop is currently at the default of using 60% of available ram. Efficiency has remained at 100% throughout all my tests. Also, this slow performance has affected me from the moment I installed Photoshop; it didn't crop up after previous good performance. The problem exists regardless of the size or number of documents I have open. Performance is still terrible even when I create a 500 x 500 pixel blank new canvas and try a simple task like drawing with the brush.
Photoshop is fully up to date, and so are my graphics drivers (Catalyst version 13.1). Any help would be greatly appreciated; at the moment performance is so bad in Photoshop that it's unusable with graphics acceleration enabled. Thanks in advance for replying.
Photoshop System Info:
Adobe Photoshop Version: 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00) x64
Operating System: Windows 8 64-bit
Version: 6.2
System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:14, Stepping:5 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Physical processor count: 4
Processor speed: 2665 MHz
Built-in memory: 16379 MB
Free memory: 13443 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 14697 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 60 %
Image tile size: 128K
Image cache levels: 2
OpenGL Drawing: Enabled.
OpenGL Drawing Mode: Advanced
OpenGL Allow Normal Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Advanced Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Old GPUs: Not Detected.
OpenCL Version: 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.4)
OpenGL Version: 3.0
Video Rect Texture Size: 16384
OpenGL Memory: 2048 MB
Video Card Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
Video Card Renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Display: 1
Display Bounds: top=0, left=0, bottom=1080, right=1920
Video Card Number: 2
Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Driver Version:
Driver Date:
Video Card Driver: aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx32,aticfx32,aticfx32,atiumd64.dll,atidxx64.d ll,atidxx64.dll,atiumdag,atidxx32,atidxx32,atiumdva,atiumd6a.cap,atitmm64.dll
Video Mode: 1920 x 1080 x 4294967296 colors
Video Card Caption: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Video Card Memory: 2048 MB
Video Card Number: 1
Video Card: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
Driver Version: 9.12.0.0
Driver Date: 20121219000000.000000-000
Video Card Driver:
Video Mode:
Video Card Caption: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
Video Card Memory: 0 MB
Serial number: 90970078453021833509
Application folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\
Temporary file path: C:\Users\RAFFAE~1\AppData\Local\Temp\
Photoshop scratch has async I/O enabled
Scratch volume(s):
C:\, 931.5G, 534.8G free
Required Plug-ins folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\Required\
Primary Plug-ins folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\Plug-ins\
Additional Plug-ins folder: not set
Installed components:
   ACE.dll   ACE 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
   adbeape.dll   Adobe APE 2012/01/25-10:04:55   66.1025012   66.1025012
   AdobeLinguistic.dll   Adobe Linguisitc Library   6.0.0
   AdobeOwl.dll   Adobe Owl 2012/09/10-12:31:21   5.0.4   79.517869
   AdobePDFL.dll   PDFL 2011/12/12-16:12:37   66.419471   66.419471
   AdobePIP.dll   Adobe Product Improvement Program   7.0.0.1686
   AdobeXMP.dll   Adobe XMP Core 2012/02/06-14:56:27   66.145661   66.145661
   AdobeXMPFiles.dll   Adobe XMP Files 2012/02/06-14:56:27   66.145661   66.145661
   AdobeXMPScript.dll   Adobe XMP Script 2012/02/06-14:56:27   66.145661   66.145661
   adobe_caps.dll   Adobe CAPS   6,0,29,0
   AGM.dll   AGM 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
   ahclient.dll    AdobeHelp Dynamic Link Library   1,7,0,56
   aif_core.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   aif_ocl.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   aif_ogl.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   amtlib.dll   AMTLib (64 Bit)   6.0.0.75 (BuildVersion: 6.0; BuildDate: Mon Jan 16 2012 18:00:00)   1.000000
   ARE.dll   ARE 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
   AXE8SharedExpat.dll   AXE8SharedExpat 2011/12/16-15:10:49   66.26830   66.26830
   AXEDOMCore.dll   AXEDOMCore 2011/12/16-15:10:49   66.26830   66.26830
   Bib.dll   BIB 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
   BIBUtils.dll   BIBUtils 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
   boost_date_time.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   boost_signals.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   boost_system.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   boost_threads.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   cg.dll   NVIDIA Cg Runtime   3.0.00007
   cgGL.dll   NVIDIA Cg Runtime   3.0.00007
   CIT.dll   Adobe CIT   2.1.0.20577   2.1.0.20577
   CoolType.dll   CoolType 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
   data_flow.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   dvaaudiodevice.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dvacore.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dvamarshal.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dvamediatypes.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dvaplayer.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dvatransport.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dvaunittesting.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dynamiclink.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   ExtendScript.dll   ExtendScript 2011/12/14-15:08:46   66.490082   66.490082
   FileInfo.dll   Adobe XMP FileInfo 2012/01/17-15:11:19   66.145433   66.145433
   filter_graph.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   hydra_filters.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   icucnv40.dll   International Components for Unicode 2011/11/15-16:30:22    Build gtlib_3.0.16615
   icudt40.dll   International Components for Unicode 2011/11/15-16:30:22    Build gtlib_3.0.16615
   image_compiler.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   image_flow.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   image_runtime.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   JP2KLib.dll   JP2KLib 2011/12/12-16:12:37   66.236923   66.236923
   libifcoremd.dll   Intel(r) Visual Fortran Compiler   10.0 (Update A)
   libmmd.dll   Intel(r) C Compiler, Intel(r) C++ Compiler, Intel(r) Fortran Compiler   12.0
   LogSession.dll   LogSession   2.1.2.1681
   mediacoreif.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   MPS.dll   MPS 2012/02/03-10:33:13   66.495174   66.495174
   msvcm80.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005   8.00.50727.6910
   msvcm90.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008   9.00.30729.1
   msvcp100.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2010   10.00.40219.1
   msvcp80.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005   8.00.50727.6910
   msvcp90.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008   9.00.30729.1
   msvcr100.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2010   10.00.40219.1
   msvcr80.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005   8.00.50727.6910
   msvcr90.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008   9.00.30729.1
   pdfsettings.dll   Adobe PDFSettings   1.04
   Photoshop.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS6   CS6
   Plugin.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS6   CS6
   PlugPlug.dll   Adobe(R) CSXS PlugPlug Standard Dll (64 bit)   3.0.0.383
   PSArt.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS6   CS6
   PSViews.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS6   CS6
   SCCore.dll   ScCore 2011/12/14-15:08:46   66.490082   66.490082
   ScriptUIFlex.dll   ScriptUIFlex 2011/12/14-15:08:46   66.490082   66.490082
   svml_dispmd.dll   Intel(r) C Compiler, Intel(r) C++ Compiler, Intel(r) Fortran Compiler   12.0
   tbb.dll   Intel(R) Threading Building Blocks for Windows   3, 0, 2010, 0406
   tbbmalloc.dll   Intel(R) Threading Building Blocks for Windows   3, 0, 2010, 0406
   updaternotifications.dll   Adobe Updater Notifications Library   6.0.0.24 (BuildVersion: 1.0; BuildDate: BUILDDATETIME)   6.0.0.24
   WRServices.dll   WRServices Friday January 27 2012 13:22:12   Build 0.17112   0.17112
Required plug-ins:
   3D Studio 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Accented Edges 13.0
   Adaptive Wide Angle 13.0
   Angled Strokes 13.0
   Average 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Bas Relief 13.0
   BMP 13.0
   Camera Raw 7.3
   Chalk & Charcoal 13.0
   Charcoal 13.0
   Chrome 13.0
   Cineon 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Clouds 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Collada 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Color Halftone 13.0
   Colored Pencil 13.0
   CompuServe GIF 13.0
   Conté Crayon 13.0
   Craquelure 13.0
   Crop and Straighten Photos 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Crop and Straighten Photos Filter 13.0
   Crosshatch 13.0
   Crystallize 13.0
   Cutout 13.0
   Dark Strokes 13.0
   De-Interlace 13.0
   Dicom 13.0
   Difference Clouds 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Diffuse Glow 13.0
   Displace 13.0
   Dry Brush 13.0
   Eazel Acquire 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Embed Watermark 4.0
   Entropy 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Extrude 13.0
   FastCore Routines 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Fibers 13.0
   Film Grain 13.0
   Filter Gallery 13.0
   Flash 3D 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Fresco 13.0
   Glass 13.0
   Glowing Edges 13.0
   Google Earth 4 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Grain 13.0
   Graphic Pen 13.0
   Halftone Pattern 13.0
   HDRMergeUI 13.0
   IFF Format 13.0
   Ink Outlines 13.0
   JPEG 2000 13.0
   Kurtosis 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Lens Blur 13.0
   Lens Correction 13.0
   Lens Flare 13.0
   Liquify 13.0
   Matlab Operation 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Maximum 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Mean 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Measurement Core 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Median 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Mezzotint 13.0
   Minimum 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   MMXCore Routines 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Mosaic Tiles 13.0
   Multiprocessor Support 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Neon Glow 13.0
   Note Paper 13.0
   NTSC Colors 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Ocean Ripple 13.0
   Oil Paint 13.0
   OpenEXR 13.0
   Paint Daubs 13.0
   Palette Knife 13.0
   Patchwork 13.0
   Paths to Illustrator 13.0
   PCX 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Photocopy 13.0
   Photoshop 3D Engine 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Picture Package Filter 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Pinch 13.0
   Pixar 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Plaster 13.0
   Plastic Wrap 13.0
   PNG 13.0
   Pointillize 13.0
   Polar Coordinates 13.0
   Portable Bit Map 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Poster Edges 13.0
   Radial Blur 13.0
   Radiance 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Range 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Read Watermark 4.0
   Reticulation 13.0
   Ripple 13.0
   Rough Pastels 13.0
   Save for Web 13.0
   ScriptingSupport 13.1.2
   Shear 13.0
   Skewness 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Smart Blur 13.0
   Smudge Stick 13.0
   Solarize 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Spatter 13.0
   Spherize 13.0
   Sponge 13.0
   Sprayed Strokes 13.0
   Stained Glass 13.0
   Stamp 13.0
   Standard Deviation 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   STL 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Sumi-e 13.0
   Summation 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Targa 13.0
   Texturizer 13.0
   Tiles 13.0
   Torn Edges 13.0
   Twirl 13.0
   Underpainting 13.0
   Vanishing Point 13.0
   Variance 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Variations 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Water Paper 13.0
   Watercolor 13.0
   Wave 13.0
   Wavefront|OBJ 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   WIA Support 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Wind 13.0
   Wireless Bitmap 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   ZigZag 13.0
Optional and third party plug-ins:
   DAZ Studio 3D Bridge 12.0
   DazUpdateScene 12.0
Plug-ins that failed to load: NONE
Flash:
   Mini Bridge
   Kuler
Installed TWAIN devices: NONE

Great news!
I followed your suggestion, Noel, and uninstalled my drivers with the Catalyst Uninstall Utility (which I hadn't used before), rebooted, reinstalled Catalyst 13.2 Beta 7, rebooted, deleted the PS Prefs, started PS, and now the performance is radically improved!
It baffles me why I would need to do a clean driver uninstall in a new system environment that has only ever had this video card, and is only a few months old, but that action seems to be what's improved the situation. Note that because I deleted the PS preferences, the good performance now occurs with the default Use Graphics Processor enabled, and Drawing Mode set to Advanced (with every feature in the Advanced dialog checked except 30bit display).
Having no reference point, I can't tell for sure if performance is as good as it theoretically ought to be for my system specs, but using the standard 13px brush is only slightly laggy behind the cursor, even if I become reckless and squiggle on the canvas violently. It wasn't just sluggish response before: Photoshop seemed to be in pain trying to draw the line segments as it laboured to catch up to the cursor. That is pretty much gone now.
Much more tellingly, zooming and panning the canvas is like it ought to be, responsive and clean, more or less like it was for me in CS4 with my old Nvidia 9600GT. The poor performance with zooming and panning was the most worrying aspect of the issue. It's a great relief to see these working more properly now.
I have to confess I'm a little embarrassed to have drug you through all this hassle only to discover that something as rudimentary as properly cleaning out the drivers would be the apparent solution. I never would have imagined that doing that, with such a new and stable system, would make any difference, since I don't have a legacy of older drivers dotting my hard drive. In any event, I'm really grateful that you guys took the time to try to help me.
In the interest of completeness, here's the relevant portion of my system info after doing the reinstall steps I mentioned above:
Adobe Photoshop Version: 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00) x64
Operating System: Windows 8 64-bit
Version: 6.2
System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:14, Stepping:5 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Physical processor count: 4
Processor speed: 2665 MHz
Built-in memory: 16379 MB
Free memory: 13680 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 14695 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 60 %
Image tile size: 1024K
Image cache levels: 4
OpenGL Drawing: Enabled.
OpenGL Drawing Mode: Advanced
OpenGL Allow Normal Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Advanced Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Old GPUs: Not Detected.
OpenCL Version: 3.0
OpenGL Version: 3.0
Video Rect Texture Size: 16384
OpenGL Memory: 2048 MB
Video Card Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
Video Card Renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Display: 1
Display Bounds: top=0, left=0, bottom=1080, right=1920
Video Card Number: 2
Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Driver Version:
Driver Date:
Video Card Driver: aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx32,aticfx32,aticfx32,atiumd64.dll,atidxx64.d ll,atidxx64.dll,atiumdag,atidxx32,atidxx32,atiumdva,atiumd6a.cap,atitmm64.dll
Video Mode: 1920 x 1080 x 4294967296 colors
Video Card Caption: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Video Card Memory: 2048 MB
Video Card Number: 1
Video Card: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
Driver Version: 12.100.17.0
Driver Date: 20130226000000.000000-000
Video Card Driver:
Video Mode:
Video Card Caption: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
Video Card Memory: 0 MB
As you can see, the Microsoft Basic Render Driver still appears as a Video Card in the list. This presumably has something to do with Windows 8, and I really don't know if its presence here is still a sign that my card is not being used to its optimal capability. I have a hunch that the slight lag that I am still experiencing with the brush when Use Graphics Processor is on -- totally absent with the acceleration turned off -- implies that Photoshop is still unable to take maximum advantage of my card. I would assume that the brush tool should be more responsive with acceleration on than off, in a rig without any issues, but that's just assumption on my part. If you turn off Use Graphics Processor on your systems, is the brush tool more or less responsive?
But again, panning the canvas with the hand tool is now extremely responsive, without any screen tearing or visible lag, and that's a massive improvement over the total meltdown of performance I was suffering from before.
Thanks again very much for your help. I'm grateful to all of you who took the time to chime in.

Bad performance with brandnew system

hello,
i set up a completely new win7-64bit based on a fresh osx (snow-leopard update) on a fresh harddisk....and i have very bad 3d performance with only 3 (!!) programs installed. i am working with autodesk 3ds max and autocad and both run very slow. my last system was win7-64bit, too, but running MUCH faster.
it must be a driver problem, but i dont know how to change the nvidia driver.
edit:
after having changed driver from directx 9 to open-gl performance is very fast.
please help.
alex
Message was edited by: mbp_3d

Hi Bruno
In the following Re: Generic Sync: Object can not be deserilized / Multiple synchronization call you had mentioned that you are using MI 2.5 SP16 Client. For your information MI doesnt support Windows Mobile 5 OS on SP16 but only from SP18 does it support this OS. Have you tried upgrading the client to any of the SPs i had mentioned in the above thread and then checked the performance?
Best Regards
Sivakumar

Facing a major problem while performing restoration of my mssql DB

Dear Experts,
I am facing a major problem while performing restoration of my mssql DB. The situation is like
1. I have successfully take full and transactional log backup in a external device using MSSQL Server Managemnt Studio.
Backup was successfully completed as per MSSQL Server Managemnt Studio message.
2. Try to restore the same using MSSQL Server Managemnt Studio. It is showing the following error
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlError: RESTORE cannot process database <DB_SID> because
it is in use by this session. It is recommended that the master database be used when
performing this operation.
I have followed the guidelines specified in the link
[SAP Help Link for Restoring the <SAPSID> Backup from a Device |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/f2/31ad56810c11d288ec0000e8200722/frameset.htm]
But everytime I am getting the same error message. I have checked with all options but there
was no resolutions. Kindly advise me in this regard.
Thanks and Regards,
Partha

http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-CA/sqltools/thread/37ee8e24-7aaa-472b-861a-fc0cc513338a
hope it helps

Best performance with forms 4.5 than 6i ?!!!

Hi,
Since i'd upgrade my app with forms 6i, i find that when i make a query, this is more slow with 6i than 4.5, with the same db(8i).
Does anyone else had the same problem?
What could i do to resolve the problem?
Thanks.
null

See my earlier posting 'Speeding load time of WEB Forms50'. I
have had no takers yet on a solution to this. There may be some
hints for you there.
Good luck on this one - Forms over the WEB seems to be very
processor and memory hungry. We would like to support about 200
users on a VERY simple search screen, but we need about 2Gbyte
of physical memory on the server to get any amount of useful
speed out of it. Each Forms session takes up about 10Mbyte on
the server - as soon as this starts swapping out to disk then
your run-time performance goes right downhill. The earlier-
mentioned posting gives some hints on speeding up the startup
time, and it does work.
Regards,
Jason Judge
Natasha Murillo (guest) wrote:
: How I can Get better performance with Forms 4.5 and 6.0 on the
: WEB???
: It is very slow and my customers are not very happy with
that...
: Please help me...
null

How does the mac mini perform with cs5

Just curious
How does the Intel HD Graphics 4000 in the new mac mini perform with cs5 photoshop cs6 photoshop?
thanks
Ted

Jeff, I appreciate your comment, so you haven't had any problem with using the painttools in CS 6 photoshop and the 3d type etc, in other words all the features that CS6 photoshop has.
I was thinking about buying the mac mini but was concerned how it works with CS 5 (which I have) I will have to take another look at the MiniMac server with the 3000 card. I do a lot of Digital Painting primarily Painter 12.2 but and would like to use the Painter brushes in CS 5 ( have not upgraded to CS 6.) My Imac is 6 years old and really is not fast enough.
Thanks for replying
Ted

Oracle XE 10.2.0.1.0 – Performance with BIG full-text indexes

I would like to use Oracle XE 10.2.0.1.0 only for the full-text searching of the files residing outside the database on the FTP server.
Recently I have found out that size of the files to be indexed is 5GB.
As I have read somewhere on this forum before size of the index should be 30-40% of the indexed text files (so with formatted documents like PDF or DOC even less).
Lets say that the CONTEXT index size over these files will be 1.5-2GB.
Number of the concurrent user will be max. 5.
Does anybody have any experience with Oracle XE performance with the CONTEXT index this BIG?
(Oracle XE license limitations: 1 GB RAM and 1 CPU)
Regards.
Edited by: user10543032 on May 18, 2009 11:36 AM
Edited by: user10543032 on May 18, 2009 12:10 PM

I have used the 100% same configuration as above, but now for the Oracle Database 11g R1 11.1.0.7.0 – Production instead of Oracle 10g XE.
The result is that AUTO_FILTER for Oracle 11g is able to parse Czech language characters from the sample PDF file without any problems.
The problem with Oracle Text 10g R2 may be I guess:
1. In embedded fonts as mentioned in the Link: [documentation | http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B12037_01/text.101/b10730/afilsupt.htm] (I tried to embbed all fonts and the whole character set, but it did not helped)
2. in the character encoding of the text within the PDF documents.
I would like to add that also other third party PDF2Text converters have similar issues with the Czech characters in the PDF documents – after text extraction Czech national characters were displayed incorrectly.
If you have any other remarks, ideas or conclusions please reply :-)

Improving persistent class performance with on-demand DB reads?

Hi,
Something that has been troubling me for some time is the data access design of persistent classes. A persistent class loads the ENTIRE data set when it is instantiated.
To me this defeats one of the advantages of get/set methods. What I would like is to be able to read data when it is first accessed.
For example: A purchase order header can be loaded in a few ms. However with items it can take 10 times as long - even more if the items are implemented as persistent classes themselves. If items are only needed half the time, a significant performance gain is realized by only reading items the first time the GET_ITEMS method is called. In my own persistence implementations using BI_PERSISTENT (Nothing to do with ABAP Persistent Classes), I implement this using private attributes to buffer data, along the lines of:
method get_items.
if m_items[] is initial.
    m_items = <read and/or instantiate items>.
endif.
re_items = m_items.
endif.
Using ABAP Persistent Objects this does not appear to be possible since they insist on loading everything up front in the DB mapping or IF_OS_STATE~INIT methods. Is some kind of on-demand reading possible using ABAP Persistent Classes?
Any input appreciated
Cheers,
Mike

Hi Mike,
yes, I am also very interested in this topic. While developing my first (and only a mid-complex) persistence application, I am expecting slightly different behaviour of linked persistent objects than you described above. According to the book 'Object Services in ABAP' and lazy loading paradigm mentioned there, the referenced persistent objects should be instantiated as representative objects only, containing no data, and the data should be physically loaded from database only once it's really needed (ie. accessed or explicitly instantiated). This should be the approach preventing the situation of mass chained instantiation of many linked persistent objects where most of them will not be needed, probably.
This is what they say about instantiation of persistent objects that are linked by persistent references.
However, since the persistent objects do not allow creating of 1:N relationships (classics: HEADER->ITEMS) via persistent references automatically, then this kind of relationship has to be maintained manually and therefore I expect you having full control of when it is accessed and instantiated for the first time...? What I want to ask here is then: is there any suitable approach which allows to maintain 1:N relationship fully or semi-automatically and which (as a disadvantage) makes the problem for you with 'full' instantiation? Am I missing something? There are also some threads Table attributes and persistent classes regarding persistent mapping of table-like attributes, but no relevant answers (this should solve my problem as the table of persistent references could be saved then).
Until now, I have found almost nothing about how the 1:N relationship should be correctly built (only 1:1 or M:1 is supported via persistent references), so I am applying the following approach in my app. Any comments are welcome (excuse some typos, as this is written in Notepad, not on the running system):
ref_header = zca_header=>agent->create_persistent( ).
guid_of_header_class = ref_header->get_cl_guid( )."cl_guid is set in IF_OS_STATE~INIT
guid_of_header_instance =
zca_header=>agent->if_os_ca_service~get_oid_by_ref( ref_header ).
ref_header->set_inst_guid(                   "keep header inst. ref. for future lookups
i_inst_guid = guid_of_header_instance
lt_r_items = ref_header->create_items(       "lt_r_items = table of items references
i_cl_guid = guid_of_header_class
i_inst_guid = guid_of_header_instance
it_items = lt_items )
and the method zcl_header->create_items then looks somewhat like this:
loop at it_items assigning <it_items>.
ref_item = zca_item=>agent->create_persistent( ).
ref_item->set_cl_guid( i_header_cl_guid = i_cl_guid ).
ref_item->set_inst_guid( i_header_inst_guid = i_inst_guid ).
ref_item->set_some_other_attrib(
    i_some_other_attrib = <it_items>-some_other_attrib
append ref_item to rt_r_items.             "rt_r_items = table of items references
endloop.
I have created a secondary index on items for header_cl_guid and header_inst_guid. This is used during the re-load of already saved items for particular header entry. Query service is used with header_cl_guid and header_inst_guid of actual header entry as filter criteria for item pesistent objects and table of item references is returned. Thus the instance attribute lt_r_items of ref_header is filled with references to relevant items again.
Thank you
Michal

JDeveloper performance with XSL Mapper

Hi All,
Not sure if this is the right place to ask this question since it has to do JDeveloper performance with SOA and not ADF.
In the XSL Transformation mapper tool, whenever I do an auto-map between two large schemas, my JDeveloper memory usage hikes up to about 1.3 GB and then both the JRE and JDeveloper hangs although the transformation finishes. The problem is that sometimes it hangs before you can save it. It almost seems like a memory leak.
NOTE: I am not getting any out-of-memory error since I increased already increased the memory.
Any help to optimize and solve this problem will be very helpful.
Thanks!

chk this
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11036_01/doc.1013/e10295/xslt_mpr.htm
you should have SOA composite application extension for this..
if you dont want a visual transformation then you can use the jdeveloper project properties -> Run/Debug -> edit run configuration -> XSLT

Problem of performance with xerces?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for