Problem with Disply dimension hierarchy ....

Hi All,
I Haved created Dimession Hierarchy.when I place only Hierachy in Report it working fine.when I Add Any Fact Column then I click +symbol it will disply Error Like This.
Error Codes: OAMP2OPY:ACIOA5LN
Assertion failure: !(ei == rList.end()) at line 2631 of ./project/webquerymanager/dynamicsql.cpp
Last time It Working Fine.we are useing 11.1.1.6.4
Any Help.

Looks like a bug
Check this Doc ID 1505504.1 or ID 1415135.1
Pls mark as correct/helpful if helps
Edited by: veeravalli on Nov 19, 2012 10:02 AM
Edited by: veeravalli on Nov 19, 2012 10:05 AM

Similar Messages

Problem with open dimension hierarchy

Hi,
I Am useing BIApps 7.9.6.3 rpd.I Drag Employee Primary Owner Organization Dimension Hierarchy into presentation layer.That Table does not open. it showing processing.I Restarted the servers Also.
Why It Will Showing Any help.....

Looks like a bug
Check this Doc ID 1505504.1 or ID 1415135.1
Pls mark as correct/helpful if helps
Edited by: veeravalli on Nov 19, 2012 10:02 AM
Edited by: veeravalli on Nov 19, 2012 10:05 AM

Problem with Time Dimension generating

Hello, everybody.
I have a problem with Time Dimension generating with the help of the Standard Wizard.
1. I choose Dimensions -> New -> Using Time Wizard
2. Set Name as "Time"
3. On the next screen I choose ROLAP: Relational Storage
4. On the next screen set Start year: 2003, Number of years: 3
5. On the next screen choose all levels of the Normal Hierarchy
On the 6-th step Wizard complete 60% of job and hang up doing nothing (buttons "Cancel" and "Help" is active).
chapter "Create REL_TIME Dimension Using the TIME Dimension Wizard", step 1-6 of tutorial =(
http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/11gr1_owb/owb11g_update_getting_started_intro/lesson3/less3_relational.htm
My system characteristics:
Builder client 11.1.0.7.0, warehouse at local computer.
can anybody give me any advice about this problem? =(
thanks in advance.

Had this issue been solved please?
I have just come across the exact same problem and this post is the only one i managed to find which describes exactly what is happening to me.
Thanks

Problem with pictures for hierarchy trees

Hello
I get a problem with tiles involving trees :
For example in the "pascategoryselect" tile, method "InitializeTree" :
        .LabelEdit = 1
        .Images.Add 1, "", LoadPicture(ResourcePath + "FolderClosed.gif")
        .Images.Add 2, "", LoadPicture(ResourcePath + "FolderOpen.gif")
        .Images.Add 3, "", LoadPicture(ResourcePath + "Leaf.gif")
        .Images.Add 4, "", LoadPicture(ResourcePath + "Iba_comp_prod.gif")
        .Nodes.Clear
The '.Image.Add ..." lines crash, the Err.Description statement is "Automation Error, Catastrophic failure" (Err.Number = -2147418113)
I have looked for the RessourcePath and file requested, all exist.
For the moment here is my "workaround"
        .LabelEdit = 1
on error resume next
        .Images.Add 1, "", LoadPicture(ResourcePath + "FolderClosed.gif")
        .Images.Add 2, "", LoadPicture(ResourcePath + "FolderOpen.gif")
        .Images.Add 3, "", LoadPicture(ResourcePath + "Leaf.gif")
        .Images.Add 4, "", LoadPicture(ResourcePath + "Iba_comp_prod.gif")
on error goto 0
        .Nodes.Clear
Have anyone ever had this problem ? How can I solve it ?
Some other trees (don't remember which though) load without problem and the FolderClosedand FolderOpenimages are displayed....
Thanks and Regards,
François

Thanks Markus, you're right I forgot to mention it : I am using version 4 with SP8.
I will have to try again to confirm this but I think it also happens in the generated application (basically, the erro is caught by the calling method, and the tile appear empty)
Regards,
François

Problem with time dimension aggregation

I have a time dimension with 2 columns:Year and week
I've created a hierarchy in it to drill down from the year to the week.
when I report the sales in week level I have the right values but when I report the sales value in year level I don't have the right aggregation.Even if the year Level is a grand Total in the hierarchy.
The problem is that for all the years I have the same value but when I add the week level to the report Then I have the right values.
What could be the problem

Hi,
1.Actually the drill down Route path is not properly generated with your given key columns in herarchies.
need to give correct key columns
like year(YYYY)-->Week(wee should be the unique column for each and evry year)
suppose:
2000-sunday
2001-sunday should be different
so mostly the problem at your week column make the unique yearweek column as the key identifier at that level
Every Week is unique cause the logical key is a combination of the year and the weeknumber
2.if not you need to set individual levels for measures in content tab...
you mean by the content tab the level tab when you doubleclick into the measure???
Thanks

Problem with Time-dep hierarchy in BEx Query

Hi,
I have a workbook that consists of 3 queries. All the 3 queries uses heriarchy and hierarchy node variables on 0CUST_SALES. The hierarchy is time-dep. 2 of the queries returns the output and 1 of them just displays "No applicable data found" for some of the nodes. I checked the hierarchy table and the date range for the nodes are in the range (01/01/2010 - 12/31/9999), the leafs have the range as 01/01/2010 - 06/30/2010. The 3rd query is the actually the summary of the other 2 queries. I checked the queries and found that the field 0CUST_SALES is on the characteristic restriction pane of the filter tab in the incorrect query and in the remainiing 2 its on the default values pane.
Will this be causing the problem in the incorrect query?
There is also a key date derivation type defined in all the queries. Its defined as Basic Time Char with the derivation type as "First day of Period". We are not using any infosets. The quries are on a multiprovider which has only basic infocubes.
Can someone please explain how this works?
Thanks and Regards,
Sujai

Hi Diogo,
Below is the code I am using in the customer exit.
SELECT * FROM zae_tt_pbuild INTO TABLE gt_pbuild.
      IF sy-subrc = 0.
        LOOP AT gt_pbuild INTO gs_pbuild.
          CONCATENATE '*' gs_pbuild-pbuild '*' into lv_pattern.
          ls_range-low = lv_pattern.
          ls_range-sign = lc_sign_i.
          ls_range-opt = 'CP'.
          APPEND ls_range TO e_t_range.
          CLEAR: ls_range,
                 lv_pattern.
        ENDLOOP.
      ENDIF.
     ENDIF.
I have tried using '%' instead of '*' aswell but the result is same.
Thanks,
Rakesh

Problems with keywords assignment (hierarchy is included)

Hi group,
this probably happens after I was letting Lightroom to a catalog optimization, but I am not quiet sure about this.
So what happens: As you know, you can create a keyword tag hierarchy and sometimes LR does this automatically.
If I now do some keyword assignments in the library mode (right panel), then these keywords get replaced by a hierarchy-to-keyword string.
E.g. if I enter a keyword 'female' and LR has a hierarchy for this (e.g. female and male are sup-levels of person), then the keyword tag entry area contains the following: person > female. If e.g. I assign both male and female e to an image, then I get as result: person > female, person > male.
This blows up the list and does not make it very readable.
Does anybody knows how to stop LR doing this? If haven't found any flag value in the options.
Thanks in advance
John

John, I think this is just part of the poor design of the key-wording feature. There are many oddities. I got my initial keyword list from D65. I found that when I use the "Enter Keywords" view of the keywords assigned to a particular image, many of them show the hierarchy they are part of, as if I had selected the "Keyword & Containing Keywords" option, but some do not. Adobe told D65 that this is related to how you create the hierarchical entries. If you create a keyword and use the "Create keyword tag inside XXXXX" option, in use it will act differently than if you drag-and-drop a keyword into an hierarchical relationship. This is completely at odds with proper programming practice! I have also found today (in LR4, by the way) that if I sync from an image with keywords to an image without keywords immediately to its left, I get duplications of keywords in the rightmost image, as if the rightmost image had updated the left one, and it had reflected the sync back to the originating image. This does not happen if I sync from the leftmost image to the rightmost one. So I went into the keyword list and unchecked that keyword for the image that had the duplication. Now I have the keyword just once, but there's no check beside it in the keyword list showing that it is being used. I'm also getting duplicates of nested keywords popping up at the top level of the hierarchy. I've just realized that this has been happening for some time. The whole keyword feature is a mess. Adobe needs to:
1. fix the keyword feature so that it works in a simple, consistent and predictable manner
2. provide users with a documentation update to explain how it now works
3. provide a cleanup utility of some sort (if necessary) to let us get our keywords rationalized
Perhaps step 0. should be "stop ignoring and/or denying the keyword problem".
I've just gotten into such a mess with my latest batch of imported photos that I'm going to have to delete all assigned keywords, including those added on import, and start again. I am not amused.
JVH

Problem with the presentation hierarchy 0YEA_QUA_MON_DAY

Hi,
Kindly anybody help me to sort out this problem:
I have selected 0YEA_QUA_MON_DAY hierarchy on 0calday.In the query I have included 0calday as free characterstic.In quey execution , first of all it displaying few rows. If I drill down to 0calday level,it does not display any rows. Here the message is ,after drilldown to 0calday level:
The presentation hierarchy 0YEA_QUA_MON_DAY acts as a dynamic filter
Diagnosis
You have activated presentation hierarchy on characteristic Calendar day. This hierarchy has the attribute that the suppression of 'non assigned' nodes is switched on ( RSH1 -> Hierarchy attributes).
System response
All data records whose characteristic value Calendar day are arranged in hierarchy are filtered automatically.
This filter is not always displayed.
Notification Number BRAIN 133
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Did any one have a solution for this?
I also have thesame issue.

Problem with intco dimension (V7)

Dear,
I have following error when processing the intco dimension
[INTCO].[TPNONE] Query [1,6] the intco dimension contains more then one hierarchy, therefore the.....
It has to be something with the FORMULA property
If I remove the [TPTOP]-[TPALL] which stands in the formula property with the member TPNONE, the process is successfull.
The error is strange because there is only one parenth defined...
The formula property is created correctly in the properties..
Does someone knows what to do?
Thx
Best regards,
Benjamin

ID     NEWID     EVDESCRIPTION     PARENTH1     ENTITY     SCALING     ENABLEJRN     FORMULA
TPTOP          Total                    N
TPNONE          Non-Interco                    N     [TPTOP]-[TPALL]
TPTOPCALC          Calculated Total                    N
TPALL          All interco     TPTOPCALC               N
IC_01          ic01     TPALL     E_01          Y
IC_02          ic02     TPALL     E_02          Y
IC_03          ic03     TPALL     E_03          Y
IC_04          ic04     TPALL     E_04          Y
IC_05          ic05     TPALL     E_05          Y
IC_06          ic06     TPALL     E_06          Y
IC_07          ic07     TPALL     E_07          Y
IC_08          ic08     TPALL     E_08          Y
IC_09          ic09     TPALL     E_09          Y
IC_10          ic10     TPALL     E_10          Y
IC_11          ic11     TPALL     E_11          Y
IC_12          ic12     TPALL     E_12          Y
IC_13          ic13     TPALL     E_13          Y
IC_14          ic14     TPALL     E_14          Y
IC_15          ic15     TPALL     E_15          Y
IC_16          ic16     TPALL     E_16          Y
IC_17          ic17     TPALL     E_17          Y
IC_18          ic18     TPALL     E_18          Y
IC_19          ic19     TPALL     E_19          Y
IC_20          ic20     TPALL     E_20          Y
IC_21          ic21     TPALL     E_21          Y
IC_22          ic22     TPALL     E_22          Y
IC_23          ic23     TPALL     E_23          Y
IC_24          ic24     TPALL     E_24          Y
IC_25          ic25     TPALL     E_25          Y
ENONE          Third party (only for jnl input)     TPTOPCALC               Y
IC_26          ic26     TPALL     E_26          Y
IC_27          ic27     TPALL     E_27          Y
IC_28          ic28     TPALL     E_28          Y
IC_29          ic29     TPALL     E_29          Y

Problem with image in Hierarchy Viewer component

Hi All,
I am using Hierarchy Viewer component in my application developed in Jdeveloper 11.1.1.6.0
Actually, my requirement is to pick the name of the "content id" stored as a value in a field in the table. Hence written code as follows, which is not showing the image.
<af:image id="img3"
inlineStyle="border-color:Black; border-width:1px; width:85px;height:120px;"
source="#{documentsService.latestReleasedVersionURL['UUCM#dDocName:#{node.EmpImage}']}"
rendered="true"/>
Please help me out ....
Thanks & Regards
Sneha
Edited by: 1002482 on Jun 6, 2013 12:46 AM
Edited by: 1002482 on Jun 6, 2013 12:48 AM

Timo,
It is supposed to pick up the image from the content server and display on the page.
I have tried the following, it worked.
1) Checked in the image in the content server with content id : SAMPLE_IMG
2) modified the code as
<af:image id="img3"
inlineStyle="border-color:Black; border-width:1px; width:85px;height:120px;"
source="#{documentsService.latestReleasedVersionURL['UUCM#dDocName:SAMPLE_IMG']}"
rendered="true"/>
Now that, I want to store the value "SAMPLE_IMG" in a field in a table, and want my application to pick up that value.
Sneha

Performance problem with attribute dimensions - please help!

Hi everybody,
I run OBIEE reports on top of EssBase 9.3 ASO cube.
My cube has 8 regular dimensions and 10 attribute dimensions.
I am running a query based on:
- 3 dimensions (TIME, BATCH, MODEL),
- 2 attributes of BATCH ( SHIFT, SHIFT_STATUS )
- and one measure.
The query runs 3 minutes (!) and returns 190 rows.
If I remove the attributes, the query runs 4 seconds for the same number of result rows.
My MDX:
With
set [TIME6] as 'Filter([TIME].Generations(6).members,
([TIME].currentmember.MEMBER_ALIAS = "2009/01" OR [TIME].currentmember.MEMBER_Name = "2009/01"))'
set [TIME7] as 'Generate([TIME6], Descendants([TIME].currentmember, [TIME].Generations(7), leaves))'
set [BATCHES] as '[DIM_BATCH_HEADERS].Generations(5).members'
set [SHIFT2] as '[SHIFT].Generations(2).members'
set [SHIFT_STATUS2] as '[SHIFT_STATUS].Generations(2).members'
set [MODEL2] as 'Filter([MODEL].Generations(2).members, ([MODEL].currentmember.MEMBER_ALIAS = "SNF_PCK" OR [MODEL].currentmember.MEMBER_Name = "SNF_PCK"))'
select
{[Accounts].[PROD_ACTUAL_QTY_KG]
} on columns,
NON EMPTY
{crossjoin ({[TIME7]},
crossjoin ({[BATCHES]},
crossjoin ({[SHIFT2]},
crossjoin ({[SHIFT_STATUS2]},{[MODEL2]}))))}
properties ANCESTOR_NAMES, GEN_NUMBER on rows
from [COP_MAAD.Cop_Maad]
Thank you in advance,
Alex
Edited by: AM_1 on Feb 26, 2009 6:35 AM
Edited by: AM_1 on Feb 26, 2009 7:03 AM

Hi Glenn,
I though that the reason might be the crossjoin with a very large set. The main dimension in this query has ~40000 members.
Is there in EssBase MDX some analog for NONEMPTYCROSSJOIN() function that exists in MSAS?
As these two attributes belong to the dimension that is used in the query, for every member of the dimension, there is one and only one member of each attribute. Therefore I though that Essbase should "know" how to behave.
Thanks for an idea. I will try to increase the space for aggregation - hope this will help...
Best Regards,
Alex

SPRUNCALCACCOUNT to copy PL results to BS problem with time dimension

Hi there,
I'm trying to copy PL result to BS account using account transformation with a simple configuration without informing source period. I'm running the datapackage informing the time dimension. it works fine for 2008.JAN but if we try with 2008.FEB we get same result. We have tried with several time periods allways getting 2008.JAN results copied to BS destination account.
Any ideas on what we're doing wrong.
Thanks in advance,
Regards, Carlos

Sorry guys, It's working fine.....it was my fault, we have a SP for carry-forward that has a little bug.

Basic noobie problem with image dimensions

Hi folks.
I'm trying to walk myself through a Layer Masking exercise, but I've run into a 'glitch' involving some very basic Photoshop CS3 sizing elements, and I'm durned if I can see what's going wrong.
I've print screened the last stage of my PSD and uploaded it to Alkaspace, here:
http://www.alkaspace.com/free/view_image/a0a4b2304/gearshake.JPG
The screen you see is made up (on an XPP SP3 laptop) of three basic components;
1) 'masking2.psd'is the file I created as background. It's 200mm x 200mm x 72 pixels\inch, RGB, 8 bits and white. But I'm not sure that this file has anything to do with my question. Rather, I think it's to do with one or the other of the two jpgs I downloaded from a tutorial site for the purposes of this exercise. These files are: (not the original names which I think were 'example1 and 2)
2) handshake.jpg 7k
3) gearwheel.jpg 25k
Here's my headscratcher:
Both of these files are 72pi and the same width, 8.82cm. (their heights are different, as you can see)
Both were set at (if it matters) 100% size.
So why is handshake front) markedly different in width from gearwheel (rear), when they're both 8.82 cm wide? Why don't the sides of the handshake image line up exactly with the sides gearwheel?
It's driving me bats. Help would be greatly appreciated :-)
TX

>There doesn't seem to be a choice in the Layer's right-click menu to turn off the "mask facility" without also removing the results of the masking process.
you can right click the mask itself in the layers palette to get a popup menu that lets you "apply" it. that kinda merges it into the rest of the layer.
>And if the Layer Mask is still activated on a layer, how does one then use the paint brush normally on the layer?
in the layers palette, on the masked layer, you can click on either the icon for the image data, or the icon for the mask data. try it. see how whichever one you click on gets a little border around it? that tells you which one will get attention when you paint on the layer in the main image.

Data slice inconsistency problem with hierarchy nodes

Hi Experts,
We want to lock planning tables from function. We create the appropriate data slices but there are problems with (material group) hierarchy nodes.
If I give the node as input variable to the function it causes inconsistency in the data slice. If I choose and add this node to the lock in modeler, the problem is the same.
We are using the following variables to create a data slice:
0VERSION
0VTYTYPE
0COMP_CODE
ZGRMAT (developed material group)
Z_YEARCR (developed yera created)
The problem also exist if I set an another type of node e.g. destination country (0RECIPCNTRY) instead of material group.
For me, the problem seems to be generic.
Do you have any idea?
Many thanks in advance
Peter

There is a note related to this proble:
Note 1070608 - Lowflag field is not valid
The implementation of this note resolves the problem.
Peter

Problems with temporal hierarchy join in BI7.0

Hello,
I am using the new feature temporal hierarchy join which enables viewing historical data over a time-dependent hierarchy.
Now this works fine as long as the hierarchy is being used in rows or columns. However if I use a hierarchy node as a selection in a structure element, the temporal hierarchy join does not work properly.
Does anyone have an idea if this should be supported?
Thanks in andvance,
Patrick

Hi Jorge,
we have BI Patch 15. I tried to find out which notes were implemented to solve the Problem.
I'm not sure which note was the leading note, but following notes were implemented:
0001061525
0001055725
0001051170
0001042353
0001041760
0001040649
0001039979
0001038008
0001036536
0001029689
0001024554
0001009908
0001002662
0001010516
Since then there have been further notes concerning different problem with the temporal hierarchy join.
I hope these will help to solve the initial problem.
Regards,
Patrick

Problem with Disply dimension hierarchy ....

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for