Probleme de verrouillage telephone

bonjour, j'ai un probleme avec mon telephone jai mis un mot de passe pour que personne ne rentre dans mon telephone mais le depuis ce matin alors que je n'ai pas changer de mot de passe il n'accepte plus mon mot de passe il me dit qu'il est faux jai 10 tentatives et j'en suis à la 10ème je ne sais pas comment faire aidez moi!!!!

J'ai le même problème!! il nous faudrait une solution car je me vois mal redemarrer mon iPhone 5 tous les matins le restant de mes jours, ce que je fais actuellement!!!
le problème concerne le reseau mais aussi le Wifi

Similar Messages

Telephone man says the problem in our telephone line is that there is a short in my laserjet 3050

HP laserjet 3050 all-in-one. Mac OXS10.4.11 power pc.
My telephone land line went out on me. The telephone repairman did his little troubleshooting thing and told me that the problem was a short in my printer. Ever heard of suc a thing and is there a fix for it?
Thanks.

Hello,
Thanks for the post. I've not heard of this issue before, very strange indeed. I've serached for anything "short" related on this product, but have found none as of yet. I might suggest also posting this question on the links provided below. Good Luck!
http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/Business-Support-Forums/ct-p/business-support
http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/Printers-LaserJet/bd-p/bsc-413
I worked for HP but my posts and replies are my own....Thank you!
*Say thanks by clicking the *Kudos!* which is on the left*
*Make it easier for other people to find solutions, by marking my answer with (Accept as Solution) if it solves your issue.*

Having major signal problems - losing important telephone calls

Since having my contract with EE i have been experiencing major signal issues. losing important phone calls etc - can you help? Iphone 6 Plus

Hi ,
Which area does this happen in?
Are you using the up to date software?
Thanks.

N96 Telephone Service Not Functioning Correctly

Good evening folks,
Now, I've had this problem for as long as I've had an N96. TWO N96's in fact, as my first was replaced by Nokia due to the screen-slide connection malfunctioning. Both have been fully firmware updated and restored on multiple occasions in an attempt to fix the problem.
The telephone service on the handset has the habit of not functioning correctly, like the service has hanged or just doesn't respond.
For example, I find a contacts name in contacts, press the green key to show their contact numbers, and green again on the number I wish to call- nothing happens, other than the available numbers disappear and you return to the regular contacts view. This is what would normally happen anyway, only you'd have an outgoing call happening over it and showing the "telephone" screen.
Or, example two, in a text message I chose Options > Call > Voice Call and press the select or middle button to initiate the call- No call, instead the options dialogue disappears and I return to the standard message view. Again, I should be in an outgoing call, not viewing my text message.
Example three, to really show the telephone service isn't working;
I'm in full signal, text messages are functioning correctly and the mobile web is working flawlessly. A friend sat next to me rings me and is immediately directed to my voicemail, not a single indication from the handset that I may have been receiving a call.
Seconds later I receive a text message from my operator to let me know about a new voicemail my friend just left me.
So, the telephone service isn't functioning as it should be.
A quick restart fixes the problem in 4 out of 5 cases, however usually within 24 hours the problem is persisting again.
Not being able to make outgoing calls isn't a problem, because at least then I know the telephone service has failed on me and I can restart.
A potentially important incoming call about anything being directed immediately to my voicemail? Problematic, especially if they don't leave a message and instead just keep trying me, as I receive no notification from my operator about missed calls and there is no way other than to try and make an outgoing call as to determine whether the service is still functioning.
It isn't shown as a regular application whilst not in a call and I don't believe I should even have to check if it's still running as this function is the main function implied in the device category 'smartphone'.
Rant over, so if there's anyone out there who could shed some light onto this situation, please do.
Also, kind of off topic- but in the case that this is a universal problem (which I'm assuming it is, having had two completely different handsets with the same symptoms), do I go after Nokia to provide me with a different model of handset, or the supplier (The Carphone Warehouse) since my handset isn't properly providing a function that is advertised?
Somehow I presume I'm rightfully entitled to a reimbursement or different model. Hopefully.
Thanks in advance people

You're so right.... I managed to get over the problems, never upgraded the firmware... Once I got all the apps I use and needed, never touched it.... Still the phone is a mess, worst ever... I came from an Iphone, fleeing from lock OS and stuff, and found myself in a Symbian hell..... Definitely Windows Mobile... I'm so down on this phone, I spent 650 dollars, one year ago.... The worst investment ever... Never again a Nokia or a Symbian smartphone, for cheap ones apparently are the best. I'll wait another year, to feel less pain when buying a new one for 600-1000 dollars.
Solution: Buy another phone... Better if it is a Windows Mobile.... As HTC for example.
Regards,

Problem connecting Oracle client 11g to server 11g

I'm trying to connect a second computer to the Oracle Server computer with a client. I have a listener running, and correct settings for the net manager. The error that I get is:
"the test did not succeed, ORA 12170: TNS connect timeout occurred. there may be an error in the fields entered (they are correct), or the server may not be ready for a connection. Is there something I have to do with the router? I'm on a wireless connection is there any problem with that?

user8953579 wrote:
I'm trying to connect a second computer to the Oracle Server computer with a client. I have a listener running, and correct settings for the net manager. The error that I get is:
"the test did not succeed, ORA 12170: TNS connect timeout occurred. there may be an error in the fields entered (they are correct), or the server may not be ready for a connection. Is there something I have to do with the router? I'm on a wireless connection is there any problem with that?Oracle is oblivious to the fact that the net is wireless.
We need to see your tnsnames.ora and sqlnet.ora files on your client computer.
We need to see the results of
lsnrctl statusfrom the database server
In addition to the following boilerplate comments, I've been doing a series of articles on tns connection issues at edstevensdba.wordpress.com
=================================
A couple of important points.
First, the listener is a +server side only+ process. It's entire purpose in life is to receive requests for connections to databases and set up those connections. Once the connection is established, the listener is out of the picture. It +creates+ the connection. It doesn't +sustain+ the connection. One listener, with the default name of LISTENER, running from one oracle home, listening on a single port, will serve multiple database instances of multiple versions running from multiple homes. It is an unnecessary complexity to try to have multiple listeners or to name the listener as if it belongs to a particular database. That would be like the telephone company building a separate switchboard for each customer.
Additional notes on the listener: One listener is capable of listening on multiple ports. But please notice that it is the *listener* using these ports, not the database instance. You can't bind a specific listener port to a specific db instance. Similarly, one listener is capable of listnening on multiple IP addresses (in the case of a server with multiple NICs) But just like the port, you can't bind a specific ip address to a specific db instance.
Second, the tnsnames.ora file is a +client side+ issue. It's purpose is for address resolution - the tns equivalent of the 'hosts' file further down the network stack. The only reason it exists on a host machine is because that machine can also run client processes.
Assume you have the following in your tnsnames.ora:
{code}
larry =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = myhost)(PORT = 1521))
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SERVICE_NAME = curley)
{code}
Now, when you issue a connect, say like this:
{code}
$> sqlplus scott/tiger@larry
{code}
tns will look in your tnsnames.ora for an entry called 'larry'. Finding it, tns sends a request through the normal network stack to (PORT = 1521) on (HOST = myhost) using (PROTOCOL = TCP), asking for a connection to (SERVICE_NAME = curley).
Where is (HOST = myhost) on the network? When the request gets passed from tns to the next layer in the network stack, the name 'myhost' will get resolved to an IP address, either via a local 'hosts' file, via DNS, or possibly other less used mechanisms. You can also hard-code the ip address (HOST = 123.456.789.101) in the tnsnames.ora.
Next, the standard networking process delivers the message to port 1521 on myhost. Hopefully, there is a listener on myhost configured to listen on port 1521, and that listener knows about SERVICE_NAME = curley. If so, the listener will spawn a server process to act as the intermediary between your client and the database instance. Communication to the server process will be on a randomly selected available port. At that point the listener is out of the process and continues to user port 1521 to await other connection requests.
What can go wrong?
First, there may not be an entry for 'larry' in your tnsnames. In that case you get "ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified" No need to go looking for a problem on the host, with the listener, etc. If you can't place a telephone call because you don't know the number (can't find your telephone directory (tnsnames.ora) or can't find the party you are looking for listed in it (no entry for larry)) you don't look for problems at the telephone switchboard.
Maybe the entry for larry was found, but myhost couldn't be resolved to an IP address (say there was no entry for myhost in the local hosts file). This will result in "ORA-12545: Connect failed because target host or object does not exist"
Maybe there was an entry for myserver in the local hosts file, but it specified a bad IP address. This will result in "ORA-12545: Connect failed because target host or object does not exist"
Maybe the IP was good, but there is no listener running: "ORA-12541: TNS:no listener"
Maybe the IP was good, there is a listener at myhost, but it is listening on a different port. "ORA-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error"
Maybe the IP was good, there is a listener at myhost, it is listening on the specified port, but doesn't know about SERVICE_NAME = curley. "ORA-12514: TNS:listener does not currently know of service requested in connect descriptor"
================

Problem with noise and call dropping

Ever since I got the new BT Internet infinity I've seem to be having problems with my telephone line.
At times I can hear feedback when I'm on the phone, at times I can hear myself talk back or I can hear a buzzing sound. Also now my phone doesn't seem to ring and if they do after one ring it will show the phone is connected when nobody has picked up the handset. It drops after one ring, The caller display doesn't work, I have two telephones one upstairs and downstairs having the same problem, the upstairs telephone the ring isn't consistent and both phones are out of sync
Not sure what is going on here and I'm sure that there isn't anything wrong at my side of things
I was told that an engineer needs to be booked and if there are any problems found inside the house I would be charged 99Pounds? For starters your own person came to install the equipment ever since then I've been having this issue.
Would like to know if this has happened to anyone and what they did ?
Kindest Regards
Jashoda Kerai

they advise all callers that as some faults are the users equipment or internal wiring you problem sound like one that would be no charge BT only charge if the fault is found after the Master socket
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Problems with fraud.

I've used my iTunes account for years without a problem. About six weeks ago someone purchased about $400 worth of television shows on my account. I live alone, it was obviously fraudulent so I tried to contact iTunes. Of course you can only communicate with them via email. What could've been resolved in minutes with a telephone call took a week of going back and forth by email with someone who repeatedly misunderstood what was happening. I had my bank cancel the card associated with the account and then changed my password per the Apple rep. I was emailing. I also updated my account with a new credit card. iTunes refused to give me a credit. The rep told me I had to dispute the charge with my credit card company, which I did. Everything was fine for the last month, until this weekend. Now, whenever I try to make a purchase or update an app, I'm told my account has been disabled. I've sent another email to iTunes but nobody has responded and it seems impossible to contact anyone at Apple who will talk to you about an iTunes problem. Has anyone had a similar problem or a telephone number to reach someone and sort this out? Dealing only via email seems like an awful waste of everyone's time and energy. Thanks.

Sorry, but there is no telephone support for the iTunes Store. I know that can be frustrating. I can only suggest you try the contact form again and see if you can get a response this time.
If you still do not get a response, you can try contacting Apple Customer Relations - call the Apple tech support number and ask to speak with a customer relations representative - and tell the rep about the lack of any response from the iTunes Store. Perhaps there will be something that can be done to prod a reply.
Good luck.

Telephone technical support and repair

Hi guys i purchase i phone4 but after 3 week it become dead i dont know why I try my best n at end i see two things are expire first one is telephone technical support n the other is repair now plz tell me the further wht can i do thx all

Actually i am new in this country and i dont speak their Language.
after 25 days i go back n ask the seller to change or replace but he say first u give us proof tht u purchase frm here but i dont have proof thts the problem now i m upset .i have two problems with cell .Telephone technical Support is expired and the other is repair and service coverage.if u now about these plz help me thxx

New telephone extension = slower broadband?

Hello.
We're moving a home office to an outbuilding, and in doing so I've run cat-5 and also good quality telephone cable (conforms to British Telecom specification CW138) between the house and outbuilding for phone and network.Our BT Homehub 2 router will stay in the house connected to the main BT socket, and I've taken one of the ethernet feeds from the back of the router and sent it down the cat-5 to the outbuilding. So far so good but our broadband speed has dropped significantly since I've connected the telephone cable, plugged in the ethernet cable etc. Is the problem the long telephone extension cable (approx 40 meters)? As I say the router is not directly connected to that but I wonder if it's introducing some interferance on the telephone line. If that is the problem, what are my options?
Thanks
Phil

Hi
Yes, I guess I posted in the wrong section which is why the thread was moved. Sorry.
I don't think the cat-5 is the issue. The broadband is slow in the house (and also the new out building) as soon as the long telephone extension cable is connected (using the compliant telephone cable). I just wondered if by connecting the long extension cable I was actually introducing some noise into our home telephone 'network' which in turn is causing the slower broadband speed.
I'm just not sure what my other options are.
Thanks
Phil

I give up - but trying this as a last resort with ...

To whom it may concern,
I would be grateful if you can look into the following issue. Please don’t stop reading at any point, it does get interesting, it’s not boring.
Broadband issue – Chain of events Telephone – Mr. Alastair Paterson,
I first rang on the 14th Aug to say that broadband was not working. I spent nearly an hour on the phone checking the sockets and filters as well at 6-7 minute line test with a call centre person. The line was tested and was advised nothing was wrong with the line. I agreed that I would give it a day and see if it came back.
15th Aug – rang again. I had to go through the whole process again with testing the sockets which I explained I’d done, testing the line, but did it all again. It was agreed then that I would require an engineer.
I was told however that if the fault was inside the house I would be charged £99.00. This I disagreed with as I was a BT customer. However as my contact was over a year, I was now out of contract. I discussed the matter in length and was advised I would be ok, if I re-signed with BT. I was then put through to sales without be asked. I was put on hold and then I arrived in Sales, where I was subject to a sales pitch. I declined the sales pitch at the time.
I was now left in a situation where I couldn’t have the internet fixed for free unless I re-joined BT. I rang BT faults again, went through the whole line and filter thing again and finally agreed for an engineer to visit my house as I was confident the fault wasn’t in the house.
16th Aug – If by magic, I was able to now get back onto the internet, I thought this must have been something to do with the calls I had made. I then called the number I had received a text from detailing the date of the engineer who was arriving and cancelled the Engineer’s appointment.
2 hours later I lost the internet again. So I was now in a position two days later, back to square one.
17th or 18th Aug – Thinking it may come back, but it didn’t. I rang again. Again I had to go through the whole issue with testing the line, testing the filters….. I explained that an engineer had been booked and cancelled, but this meant nothing I had to go through the whole thing again. I was also told again if the fault was inside the house, the engineer if booked would cost £99.00.
Now I was starting to think that the fault maybe in the house. So I rang BT sales to save myself the £99 and advised them of the problems I was having and a new package was agreed and due to the issues, I managed to get BT vision in the deal, basically the same price as I was paying before. The BT vision engineer was then booked for September 10th between 13.00 and 16.00. I thought this was enough time for BT to sort the internet problem out.
Between the 20th Aug and the 10th September I spend numerous hours trying to get the internet sorted and another engineer out. I was told I wasn’t allowed an engineer to come out to me as the phone number was on a new account as I had changed packages and that the line would not be fixed until the 7th/8th September. I was therefore a further 17 days without broadband.
The 7th September was 3 days before the engineer was to arrive to fit the BT box. This was the day of the new contract started. No matter how I explained what had happened before, I couldn’t get another engineer out before. This was absolute madness, I was now without the internet still paying BT for the internet on my existing account, but it wasn’t available till the 7th September on the new account. The original fault was given on the 14th Aug. Despite ringing several times to try an escalate this, I was hitting my head against a brick wall, at one point I was on the phone for 1hr 40 mins only to be finally cut off after waiting 13 minutes in the faults department, they just ignored me, I wasn’t abusive, just very cross.
Every time I rang to speak to someone, they made me go through the whole testing of line and changing of filters. I kept advising that they just needed to read their notes and to put me through to someone who could make a decision. I spoke to several people and the last person said that the engineer arriving on the Monday 10th Sep with BT vision would be made aware of the fault.
Finally the 7th September (the start of the new contract) came and 3 days before the engineer was to arrive hoping the broadband would be fixed as this was now a new account. It wasn’t, nor was it on the 8th. I was advised my BT Vision box would arrive the 7th; I stayed in all day for it, not to arrive. It didn’t arrive on the 8th either which was a Saturday.
Monday the 10th I rang the number for BT vision problems number to say that the box hadn’t arrived. I advised that I had received two texts informing that the box would arrive on the 7th. I was advised that it was in fact wrong and that the engineer would be coming out with the box, I asked them to contact the engineer again to advise that my broadband still wasn’t working despite him turning up, I spend 20 minutes explaining the whole situation again this but wasn’t confident that they would get in contact with him, but they said they would. At least he had been contact twice now about the broadband fault.
The BT vision engineer Shaun arrived exactly on time on Monday 10th Sep. I explained the difficulty I had had over the past few weeks and he duly advised me that he knew nothing of the fault; he was only there to fit the BT vision box. As you can imagine, I was then at a point where I could go nowhere, apart from scream.
Please don’t get bored…it does get better…………………
Shaun kindly tested the line and advised the fault was outside of the house (thank god) and nothing was wrong with the socket or connections within the house. His laptop confirmed this. It was the BRAS sync speed that he couldn’t do anything about it except report it to BT wholesale. It would take 48hours to fix. Shaun was very helpful and left without leaving the BT box as it wasn’t going to work. The speed he reported to me was less than 0.25kb, it should be 3,000kb. The line speed was at 3.5 – 4.0
One hour later after Shaun had gone I tried to make an outgoing call, I was unable to do this. I could receive calls but not make them. Clearly the wiring was now wrong after the engineer had looked at it.
I left it till Wednesday 12th (48 hours later) when I called to say that not only did my broadband still not work after 48 hours I could no longer make outgoing calls. I then had to go though the whole testing the line again and changing the filters, this must have been the 6 or 7th time I had done this since the 14th Aug. You must understand my utter frustration by this time and speaking to a call centre that are very difficult to understand at any time, to top it off, they were not aware of the report the engineer had put in. I was back at square one again, for the centre to say they have no record of the report the engineer had made was unbelievable. I watched Shaun the engineer type the report and send it.
It was agreed that another engineer would be send out; this was arranged for the Friday.
Friday arrived, still not being able to make outgoing calls and without broadband. Steve arrived in the afternoon as agreed and after a chat and a cup of coffee said he was only here to fix the problem with the telephone line faults, he was nothing to do with broadband. I was about to go into orbit…….
Steve fixed the issue with the outgoing calls, and was very happy to try and help me with the broadband issue, but this was not his area, despite having knowledge of it. He made this clear; he was not told about the broadband problem.
Stay with it…it gets better…
I then proceeded to ring the BT call centre again when Steve the engineer was there and explained the situation, they again asked me to go through the whole line test and filter process, despite explaining the whole situation, beforehand. I passed the engineer to the person in the call centre and he explained to the person (Rubel) what the fault was.
Shaun had come to the same conclusion that it was the BRAS speed. He explained this to the call centre operator who then asked him to test the line and check the filters, so he could do a test. I could also see Steve getting angry, but he was very professional. Finally after 40 minutes it was agreed that I should wait another 48 hours for the BRAS issue to be resolved. This was after the same person asked me to test the line, and as he put explained,” he was forced to ask the question”.
On the Saturday I re-arranged for the BT Vision engineer to call again as I was confident that finally the issue had been identified and it would be sorted. I knew it would be over a week before the BT Vision arrived. The engineer was book for Saturday 22nd September.
On Monday 17th Sept, Yudish rang me to say that the fault had been resolved; I challenged this as I was still unable to get on. I told him it was the BRAS sync and not the line speed and he went away and checked and then agreed with me it was running at 135kb, yes there was a fault. He would speak to BT wholesale and get it resolved, he couldn’t do it on-line and that it would take another 48 hours. Now this time I was just beginning to laugh to myself. All of this was explained by the engineer and me the previous Friday, yet nothing had been done. Yudish would ring me back again on Wednesday 19th at 09.30am as another 48 test needed to be done.
Yudish did ring on the 19th Sept all be it at 09.43, he rang to say there was still a problem with the BRAS and that he needed to send any engineer. By this time I very sorry I got very irate. He advised me that the engineer would be going to the exchange as well as my house as the fault had to be fixed manually as it couldn’t be done remotely. He advised me that if the fault was in the house I would have to pay £99.00, this despite now being a new BT customer. I put the phone down. The engineer is arriving Monday 24th September between 08.00 and 13.00, the txt said I received.
Today is Thursday 20th September and I now have an engineer coming Saturday for BT vision and Monday to hopefully fix Broadband. I’m not cancelling the Saturday engineer because I want to keep the BT box and fit it myself if the fault is not fixed Saturday or Monday. If the fault isn’t fixed Monday, I will be cancelling all ties with BT and contacting offcom.
I’m not confident that I will get a response, however I will pursue as long as it takes.
I do want some serious compensation for the total lack of service, as well as not being able to use broadband since the 14th Aug, not being able to make outgoing calls and generally the stress and 3 day holiday’s I have taken off to be in when an engineer or BT Vision box is to arrive.
Yours sincerely
Alastair Paterson

Hi Alipat1,
Sorry to hear that you've been having an awful lot of trouble with your BT Services.
Firstly the call out charge of £99 is a charge Openreach (the company that the engineers work for who fix and maintain the lines for all communication providers) is passed onto BT Retail (your communication provider) which will then be passed onto you if there is a fault within your property or equipment.
Openreach, a division of the BTplc Group, but who are a separate company under the BTplc group due to Ofcom rules, have many different types of engineers for specific problems.
Openreach maintain and fix the lines for all communication provider is the UK. BT Retail do not get any priority or special treatment from Openreach as Openreach treat all isps/communication providers equally.
As you have had so much trouble trying to restore and setup your BT Services then would you like to contact the BT Care Team by clicking on the link below.
Contact BT Care Team
The BT Care Team are a BT UK Based specialist team who have a good reputation for solving customer problems.
Once contacting them they will reply either by phone or email within 3 working days, however you will be given a tracking number immediately after sending the request. Please take note of this.
cheers
I'm no expert, so please correct me if I'm wrong

How long can it take for BT to repair a BT line?

I am concerned that I am going for some sort of record!
I have been having problems with my telephone line, there is no dial-tone and the DSL is all over the place. After checking that it was not an equipment failure on my side I logged a fault on the 9th February. Literally within hours (I was impressed) I had not one but two BT vans outside to trace the fault. They very efficiently diagnosed the problem to be a connection fault with the wire that was replaced about a year ago (the grass has only just grown back in my front garden). That was it. A week later I still had the fault, the fault web site says the ticket was closed and so I called in to 151 and was told “an engineer would be with me by 5pm that day”, they were not. So the next day I called again and was told “an engineer would be with me by 5pm that day”; fearing a bad case of deja vu at this point I asked to speak with a supervisor who was very understanding. However, basically I was told that the line is waiting for contractors to dig up the wire again and would have to wait until “next month”. How long should this take?
I am at the point where I am waiting for some undefined point in time for someone to dig a hole so that someone else can come along and fix the wire. I have been a BT customer basically since I left home, quite some years ago, this line alone I have had ADSL on since early 2001. At this point I am considering dropping everything I have with BT and switching to another provider entirely. I try to do my bit for the environment and work from home when I can, currently I either hit the environment and drive into work or it cost me on my cell phone. The only reason I have not already as I know that they would end up providing the connection over the same wire – perhaps their customer service will be better… If there was virgin cable in my street I would have switched already!

Hi AGeezer,
If the road has to be dug up then there needs to be permission granted from owner/council and of course the road must be closed etc so sometimes it can take a while to get all this arranged.
I'll be happy to keep you up to speed and let you know what's happening as the updates come through.
Could you drop me in an email please with your BT account and telephone number along with a link back to this thread.
Just send to the email address in my profile and mark FAO Craig please.
Thx
Craig
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry but we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)”
td-p/30">Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Can only print one copy at a time in AppleWorks since upgrading to Tiger

Since upgrading to Tiger 10.4.3, (now using version10.4.6) and AppleWorks 6.2.9, I cannot print more than one copy of my document using either of my Epson printers, a R200 and a C86. I did not have this problem with Panther and AW 6.
Apple techs said to reinstalled AW, did not help. Then did a complete archive and reinstall of Tiger, no help, then created a new preference folder, no help.
I found by trial and error that my Grammarian spell and grammar program by Linguisoft uses an input method to be active in order to correct AW documents. I sent them an email and their reply was, this is a bug in Mac OS X 10.4.x (all versions as of Nov, 2005) Specifically, if an input method is active, you will be unable to edit the number of copies or page range values in the dialog versions of Print and Page Setup. This is not a problem in the sheet versions of Print and Page Setup.
Certain older applications still use these dialogs (i.e., AppleWorks) instead of the more appropriate sheet equivalents. To clarify the difference, the sheet versions are "attached" to the actual document you are printing (take a look at, say, TextEdit), while the dialog versions appear modally in front of all document windows in applications that use them.
I wrote a three page letter to Apple and received a call from them, it seems that for now no upgrades to correct this problem is in the works, so for now I will have to make my corrections to all documents that I am working on, then change the input method in Grammarian and print my copies, then go back and make Grammarian active again.
Any suggestions on how to resolve this problem or am I the only one?
iMac G5 Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Hello DaisyMay,
You're quite welcome. Very glad to hear it helped!
Yet I'd like to mention the true ones of merit are the contributors of the original Japanese thread. I've just summarized and translated a bit.
Regarding why it takes so long to fix this bug/flaw, I suspect that it is because it won't affect the majority of American users who do not use input method at all, and besides, it seemingly affects only Carbon API, that Apple Computer Inc. is liable to neglect lately.
However, input method is a vital piece in CJK (Chinese, Japanese, Korean) languages, and any other languages that use more than 256 characters, and also quite a few Carbon applications are still in service, so for us (Japanese, e.g.), this bug/flaw is quite unacceptable.
It's new for me to know a non-CJK program, Grammarian, uses input method. Now I understand you'd see this bug/flaw unacceptable as well!
At least one of the contributors of Japanese thread said he let Apple Computer Japan know this problem via official telephone support channel. Also other said that Ergosoft Corp., the maker of EGWord, stated that this is a known-issue of OSX10.4 and they can do nothing but wait for Apple to fix it. Ergosoft has been specialized to Macintosh platform since 1984, so it's quite unlikely they had not reported this problem to Apple via developer channel.
After all, I think Apple knows this problem, whether a bug or a flaw.
Well, possibly, it might not be sufficient for an end-user to point out the problem via Apple's telephone support channel...
In such case, you may try this form -
http://www.apple.com/macosx/feedback/
In my humble opinion, they should shortly fix this, and meanwhile they should promptly publish the user-proposed work-around methods as a Knowledge Base article.
Have beautiful May,
Hiroto
Mac OS 9.1.x

What you need to know about British Telecom Total ...

I don't want to waste time on this forum. I've changed to Virgin - and thank God !
Here's the text of the last letter I wrote to Customer Service Director, BT plc, Correspondence Centre, Durham, DH98 1BT. I got the briefest of replies, which dealt with none of the points I raised.
During April I was engaged in searching for a new flat. There were a number of possible candidates. I phoned British Telecom to ask about the service to the flat I favoured
Your representative told me that I could expect up to 4 Mbs in this are. That was a lie
The maximum possible speed is 2 Mbs. My IP Profile has typically been 1,2Mbs and currently you have restricted me to .9 Mbs and then to .78 Mbs
Given that I was at the start of an 18 month contract with you, I would not have moved to this address had I been told – truthfully – by BT that this area is the worst in Cardiff for Internet access.
In the same call your representative told me that there would be no problem providing a telephone service to 93 B because the line had very recently been in use and just needed to be switched on at the exchange That was a lie.
Before moving in, I plugged a handset into the BT socket. There was no 'soft dial tone' which confirms that an inactive line is still connected to the exchange. I notified BT three times, but was assured – in a patronising manner – that then line had been tested and would be connected Friday 30th May. It wasn't of course.
I notified BT by email. No reply on Saturday, nor the following days. On Tuesday an engineer called me. He told me my phone was working. I said it wasn't. He said he would check and ring me back within a half hour. He did not do so.
It was not until the following Friday, that an engineer called and the problem was resolved. By that time I had spoken to the landlord and discovered that the BT line had not been in use for some time. Previous tenants had taken the Virgin Media telephone service. The flat had been decorated and the condition of the BT cabling inside the house could not be guaranteed.
You have therefore deprived me of my telephone/internet service during the first week of May. You have not offered any compensation.
I now raise a matter which may seem marginal, but which speaks volumes for the way British Telecom manage their business. The BT website offers a 'BT Community Forum'. I registered to use it because I wanted to document my experience for the benefit of other customers. The procedure ends with a message saying that an email with a clickable link will be sent, serving to verify the identity of the person registering. No such email was received. I tried again. No result. I notified BT. No reply.
After perhaps six emails, a young woman phoned me. She wasted half an hour of my time establishing what I had already said in my emails. She said she would pass the matter on to technicians. No response – of course.
It is evident that BT does not allow customers to register to use the BT community Forum, for fear that you will receive bad publicity. Given the shoddy manner in which you treat your customers, I imagine that bad publicity is inevitable. The Forum is a sham.
I now come to the main issue – the provision of an Internet service. I wish once more to make it clear that it is not the slowness of this service that is the principal issue – it is the dishonesty of British Telecom personnel.
I add that I am being advised by an independent expert who is an ex-BT manager with knowledge of the provision of digital services in Cardiff. You will understand that the press are always interested in 'whistle-blowers'
If I had been honestly advised by BT that the area I was proposing to move to was poorly served by BT for digital services – and if I was experiencing the best speed that the line could offer me – about 1.5 Mbs real download speed – then I would consider myself bound by my contract with you. I would have moved to this area, knowing what performance I could expect.
However, as I have outlined above, my decision to move here was largely based on a lie told to me by your representative on the phone – that I could expect up to 4Mbs
In addition, the line speed has now been restricted to .78 Mbs. In my last letter I said that on the first occasion this 24 hour restriction was imposed I had complained and the peak time restriction was lifted. I had 1.2 Mbs off-peak, and .9 Mbs peak speeds.
This continued to the end of May. On the 2nd June ther 24 hour restriction was reimposed.
I have received an email from your customer service manager stating that this is simply because of 'long line length'. Very little technical knowledge is required to know that that statement is nonsense.
My independent advisor tells me that in fact technicians constantly 'tune' speeds in bad areas. Obviously you try to get as many customers under contract as possible by lying to them about the speeds they will receive, then progressively reduce their line performance in order to accommodate other customers
It is quite simply an outrage that BT should behave in this fashion, and nothing will please me more than having an opportunity to describe all of this in court.
I estimate that the damages in time and stress you have caused me amount to one thousand pounds. I look forward to receiving your cheque for that amount.

Hi sonsenfrancais,
Welcome to the forum.
I am sorry to hear you've now moved to another provider following some problems with the installation of your line and broadband speeds, if there's anything you'd like us to look into feel free to drop me an email at [email protected] with your BT account details.
All the best,
Stephanie
Stephanie
BTCare Community Manager
If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post. If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

How to use LTE on iPad 4 (A1460) from US (Verizon) in the UK (EE)

If you purchase the iPad 4 model A1460 in the US on the Verizon network, it will not connect to 4G LTE on the UK EE network - you will only get 3G.
To enable LTE you must do a full factory reset (Settings -> General -> Reset -> Erase all Content and Settings).
Once the iPad restarts it will connect to LTE. Note you should backup any data first and then you can restore it afterwards and will still have LTE.
This seems to be a recurring problem from discussions with the EE store and helpline who could not diagnose the problem. Apple telephone support eventually suggested the above steps which are due to Verizon's LTE network settings being stored on the iPad and there seems to be no other way to switch to the UK ones other than a full erase.
Hope this helps others!

Hi Dave,
Verizon is somewhat different from normal GSM/HSPA/LTE carriers in the respect that it still offers some of it's service over CDMA EVDOx1 A/B. The CDMA protocol is not usually delivered using a sim card only, and there are carrier settings in the iPad which are for this purpose.
I do not believe the iPad is locked to Telstra as 4th generation iPads are all unlocked by default. You need to give the MEID and IMEI number to Verizon. When they have been added to Verizon's network, then insert the Verizon sim card and completely factory reset the device. You will lose everything. When the device reboots, it should come up onto Verizon. If you restore, you may lose the Verizon carrier settings.
The 4th generation A1460 iPad seems to be a dual mode device between CDMA and non CDMA carriers. And the mode seems to be set upon the first encounter with a sim card after a complete reset.
To confirm the device is not locked, pop a T-Mobile or AT&T sim card into it. If it is locked, you will get a message stating that it is carrier locked. If not, you should see 3G service on either of those networks.
I would strongly recommend finding a small techie independent dealer who can probably help with this more than the staff in Verizon. Verizon is a very controlled network and BYOD is not massively supported at the best of times. They are unlikely to have experience of this and their text book response would be that they do not support it.
I'm also unsure as to whether or not Verizon offers LTE data on Prepaid plans so if it is a prepaid plan, you would only get 3G (CDMA) which after using Telstra would not impress you much speed-wise.
What may be an easier solution although not as desirable would be putting a prepaid T-Mobile sim card in. They now support DC-HSPA on 1900Mhz in many markets and it is nearly as fast as Verizon's LTE and quite cheap too. (With this T-Mobile solution, no reset would be required).
Good luck.
J.

Error : simply creating a database in oracle

Hello,
I have recently started with oracle and I am trying to create a database using create database sql as below, but receving some errors, can someone please help me for a direction to resolve it.
CREATE DATABASE OXXXXI
USER SYS IDENTIFIED BY password
USER SYSTEM IDENTIFIED BY password
LOGFILE GROUP 1 ('C:\ORACLE\oradata\OXXXXI\redo01.log') SIZE 51200K,
GROUP 2 ('C:\ORACLE\oradata\OXXXXI\redo02.log') SIZE 51200K,
GROUP 3 ('C:\ORACLE\oradata\OXXXXI\redo03.log') SIZE 51200K
MAXLOGFILES 32
MAXLOGMEMBERS 5
MAXLOGHISTORY 1
MAXDATAFILES 100
CHARACTER SET AL32UTF8
NATIONAL CHARACTER SET UTF8
EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL
DATAFILE 'C:\ORACLE\oradata\OXXXXI\SYSTEM01.DBF' SIZE 325M REUSE
SYSAUX DATAFILE 'C:\ORACLE\oradata\OXXXXI\SYSAUX01.DBF' SIZE 325M REUSE
DEFAULT TABLESPACE users
DATAFILE 'C:\ORACLE\oradata\OXXXXI\USERS01.DBF'
SIZE 500M REUSE AUTOEXTEND ON MAXSIZE UNLIMITED
DEFAULT TEMPORARY TABLESPACE tempts1
TEMPFILE 'C:\ORACLE\oradata\OXXXXI\TEMP01.DBF'
SIZE 20M REUSE
UNDO TABLESPACE undotbs
DATAFILE 'C:\ORACLE\oradata\OXXXXI\UNDOTBS01.DBF'
SIZE 200M REUSE AUTOEXTEND ON MAXSIZE UNLIMITED;
CREATE DATABASE OXXXXI
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01092: ORACLE instance terminated. Disconnection forced
ORA-01501: CREATE DATABASE failed
ORA-01519: error while processing file '%ORACLE_HOME%\RDBMS\ADMIN\dtxnspc.bsq'
near line 5
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-30012: undo tablespace 'UNDOTBS1' does not exist or of wrong type
Process ID: 13960
Session ID: 130 Serial number: 3
SQL>
Thanks!

808116 wrote:
another doubt related to same.=================================
A couple of important points.
First, the listener is a server side only process. It's entire purpose in life is to receive requests for connections to databases and set up those connections. Once the connection is established, the listener is out of the picture. It creates the connection. It doesn't sustain the connection. One listener, with the default name of LISTENER, running from one oracle home, listening on a single port, will serve multiple database instances of multiple versions running from multiple homes. It is an unnecessary complexity to try to have multiple listeners or to name the listener as if it belongs to a particular database. That would be like the telephone company building a separate switchboard for each customer.
Additional notes on the listener: One listener is capable of listening on multiple ports. But please notice that it is the listener using these ports, not the database instance. You can't bind a specific listener port to a specific db instance. Similarly, one listener is capable of listnening on multiple IP addresses (in the case of a server with multiple NICs) But just like the port, you can't bind a specific ip address to a specific db instance.
Second, the tnsnames.ora file is a client side issue. It's purpose is for address resolution - the tns equivalent of the 'hosts' file further down the network stack. The only reason it exists on a host machine is because that machine can also run client processes.
Assume you have the following in your tnsnames.ora:
larry =
(DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS_LIST =
      (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = myhost)(PORT = 1521))
    (CONNECT_DATA =
      (SERVICE_NAME = curley)
)Now, when you issue a connect, say like this:
$> sqlplus scott/tiger@larrytns will look in your tnsnames.ora for an entry called 'larry'. Next, tns sends a request to (PORT = 1521) on (HOST = myhost) using (PROTOCOL = TCP), asking for a connection to (SERVICE_NAME = curley).
Where is (HOST = myhost) on the network? When the request gets passed from tns to the next layer in the network stack, the name 'myhost' will get resolved to an IP address, either via a local 'hosts' file, via DNS, or possibly other less used mechanisms. You can also hard-code the ip address (HOST = 123.456.789.101) in the tnsnames.ora.
Next, the request arrives at port 1521 on myhost. Hopefully, there is a listener on myhost configured to listen on port 1521, and that listener knows about SERVICE_NAME = curley. If so, you'll be connected.
What can go wrong?
First, there may not be an entry for 'larry' in your tnsnames. In that case you get "ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified" No need to go looking for a problem on the host, with the listener, etc. If you can't place a telephone call because you don't know the number (can't find your telephone directory (tnsnames.ora) or can't find the party you are looking for listed in it (no entry for larry)) you don't look for problems at the telephone switchboard.
Maybe the entry for larry was found, but myhost couldn't be resolved to an IP address (say there was no entry for myhost in the local hosts file). This will result in "ORA-12545: Connect failed because target host or object does not exist"
Maybe there was an entry for myserver in the local hosts file, but it specified a bad IP address. This will result in "ORA-12545: Connect failed because target host or object does not exist"
Maybe the IP was good, but there is no listener running: "ORA-12541: TNS:no listener"
Maybe the IP was good, there is a listener at myhost, but it is listening on a different port. "ORA-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error"
Maybe the IP was good, there is a listener at myhost, it is listening on the specified port, but doesn't know about SERVICE_NAME = curley. "ORA-12514: TNS:listener does not currently know of service requested in connect descriptor"
Third: If the client is on the same machine as the db instance, it is possible to connect without referencing tnsnames and without going through the listener.
Now, when you issue a connect, say like this:
$> sqlplus scott/tigertns will attempt to establish an IPC connection to the db instance. How does it know the name of the instance? It uses the current value of the enviornment variable ORACLE_SID. So...
$> export ORACLE_SID=fred
$> sqlplus scott/tigerIt will attempt to connect to the instance known as "fred". If there is no such instance, it will, of course, fail. Also, if there is no value set for ORACLE_SID, the connect will fail.
check executing instances to get the SID
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ ps -ef|grep pmon|grep -v grep
oracle    4236     1 0 10:30 ?        00:00:00 ora_pmon_vlnxora1set ORACLE_SID appropriately, and connect
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ export ORACLE_SID='vlnxora1
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ sqlplus scott/tiger
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Wed Sep 22 10:42:37 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing optionsNow set ORACLE_SID to a bogus value, and try to connect
SQL> exit
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ export ORACLE_SID=FUBAR
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ sqlplus scott/tiger
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Wed Sep 22 10:42:57 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
ERROR:
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not exist
Linux Error: 2: No such file or directory
Enter user-name: Now set ORACLE_SID to null, and try to connect
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ export ORACLE_SID=
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ sqlplus /scott/tiger
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Wed Sep 22 10:43:24 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
ERROR:
ORA-12162: TNS:net service name is incorrectly specifiedOk, that is how we get from the client connection request to the listener. What about the listener's part of all this?
The listener is very simple. It's job is to listen for connection requests and make the connection (server process) between the client and the database instance. Once that connection is made, the listener is out of the picture. If you were to kill the listener, all existing connections would continue. The listener is configured with the listener.ora file, but if that file doesn't exist, the listener is quite capable of starting up with all default values. One common mistake with the listner configuration is to specify "HOST=localhost" or "HOST=127.0.01". This is a NONROUTABLE ip address. LOCALHOST and ip address 127.0.0.1 always mean "this machine on which I am sitting". So, all computers are known as "localhost" or "127.0.0.1". If you specify this address, the listener will only be capable of receiving requests from the machine on which it is running. If you specified that address in your tnsnames file - on a remote client machine - the request would be routed to the machine on which the requesting client resides. Probably not what you want.
=====================================

Probleme de verrouillage telephone

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for