Production order confirmation date & time not matching with MB51.
Hi All,
We are facing a problem when we confirm production order in a local time zone but when we go and check the material document MB51 , we find the posting date and time is showing System date and time and not the local date and time - in the month end we are facing the problems in reports preperation.
Please find the example as below-
Step-1
I do confirmation of Production order 101939015 for the Plant 2041
on 03/12/2007 at 11:39:33 ( USER TIME ZONE),
Step-2
Now go to the MB51 (Material document list)and check the posting time
- here the posting date and time is 03/11/2007 & 23:39:37. ( SYSTEM TIME ZONE.)
Material Document Number : 4909412794
From the above example we can see that the production order was confirmed in USER TIME ZONE ,but the document was posted in SYSTEM TIME ZONE, which is not acceptable to the USER, as in the month-end he is not getting the correct Reports. User wants a harmonized date & time.
Can anybody give some solution its very urgent.
Nitin.
Hi Nitin,
Can you check the confirmation time in the system by displaying confirmation and then there look for "Admin" data.
Also let us know whether Confirmation/Goods Movment is online update or run in background as job?
Please let us know your findings,
Regards,
Prasobh
Similar Messages
-
Stock transport order requiremnet date does not match in tranRRP3) &MD04
STO delivery date does not match in transaction MD04 (ECC 6.0) and RRP3 (SCM5.1). This situation occurs when delivery date in STO is past due. During Shipment Scheduling & avaibilty check, materail staging/availability date(EKET-MBDAT) get updated with current date. This EKET -MBDAT date is reflecting in the stock requirement list as a requirement date which is correct. Still APO product view screen dispalys the past due date as a requiremnet date instead of date in MBDAT.
Please let me know in case of any more clarification on this.Dear Sanjay,
STO Delivery Date is receipt date at destination location. This minus Transportation Lead time is STO requirement date at source.
When you conduct ATP check for this PO/STO, your committed date is updated at source and delivery date will be updated as committed date plus TL lead time.
Do check your GR/GI times in Product Master as primary date mismatch issue.
If you are using any Customized program for updating EKET-MBDAT, it wont automatically trigger the change date in APO.
In such cases you need to run CCR in APO and reconcile.
The better way is to periodically schedule IM initialization (RIMODINI). This maps all R3/ECC data in your IM for PO/STOs and you would see the consistency in APO and ECC.
Regards,
Bipin -
Outline Agreement (Contract) data does not match with EKPO table.
Hi,
I have created a outline agreement(Contract) with net price as 100 / 1 Kg. But when I go to EKPO table in front of Net Price it is reflecting net price as 1 / 1 Kg. So it shows that it is dividing the net price by 100 in Table EKPO. This is happening with the currencies which are maintained in T Code OY04 (Currencies like JPY, CLP, ESP, ITL) with decimals as 0.
Rest all curriencies which have not maintained in OY04, there is no problem in EKPO as the data matches with Outline Agreement Net Price.
Request you to please provide the input to resolve the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Neeraj SinghHi Neeraj Singh,
The value of data stored in EKPO depends on the decimal places defined
for the currency. In standard the decimal places is taken as 2 . Therefore the value will be
the same as order price if the currency is defined for two decimal
places ( default is 2 ).
However, if the decimal places for JPY is defined as zero the table
will show a value of price /100. If you choose a currency with
3 decimal places the value in the table will be price * 10 and so on.
Example:
Currency Decimal places Order price Value in EKPO
SGD 2 2000 2000
NLG 2 2000 2000
JPY 0 2000 20
KWD (Kuwati Dinar) 3 2000 20000
ITL 0 2000 20
All currencies that do not have any decimal places at all
(TCURX-CURRDEC = 0) must have EKPO-NETPR multiplied by 100.
Please check SAP notes which may be of help to understand this issue 53206 and 137626
The issue you reported in not an error but standard. I hope this information is of help.
Regards,
Lorraine
Edited by: Lorraine Donnelly on Jul 12, 2010 6:57 PM -
Production Order confirmed dates
Dear All,
While displaying production order can u please tell me how the system calculate confirmed date
Basic data and scheduling date are understood but how the confirmed start and finish date are calculated ?
Can any one clear my doubt.
Regards,
Phalgun Pateleven in co15 concept is same..
actual finish date or confirmed date is nothing but when all the stock is produced and delivered.
for example, the order is for 10 pc. if you confirm 10 pc and GR 10 pc, you can see delivred quantity field will be 10. then system automatically populates the confirmed end date -
F.54 is not match with MB51
Hello Guru's,
i am trying to check the RM consumption GL accounts in F.54 with the stock consumption report t.code MB51 by using movement type 201 & 202. but these two repots are not matching.
can anybody help that what other GL accounts needs to consider for comparisin with MB51.
appreciate your quick reply.
thanksI have check in my system and it shows the exact value .
MB51
MC45
Every thing is matching .
Please check the dates whether you have given exact dates in MB51 and MC45 .As per your screenshot it shows 01.01.2014 to 01.04.2014 .
Please check once again and revert me back . -
KNA1-UPDAT/ KNA1-UPTIM ,Confirmation date/time not getting updated CRM/ECC
Hi
I found a case where, when Gen. data of BP is changed in CRM, Table BUT000 is updated with corresponding date and time of change. This chaged data is replicated to ECC but in KNA1 table UPDAT- update date and UPTIM- update time fields are not updated.
Can anyone suggest possible solution for this.
Thanks
RahulHi
I found a case where, when Gen. data of BP is changed in CRM, Table BUT000 is updated with corresponding date and time of change. This chaged data is replicated to ECC but in KNA1 table UPDAT- update date and UPTIM- update time fields are not updated.
Can anyone suggest possible solution for this.
Thanks
Rahul -
Query data does not match with Multiprovider
hello,
I am as confused as my subject.
I executed the query from Multiprovider, which getting the data from sales and inventory cube.
Everything works fine until I try to validate some of the data.
I can validate some early records but I cannot see later ones in any of the cubes or multiprovider.
I deleted the data and loaded all over again but didnt work.
I am trying to display the record from Plant, material and calday ... i do see the date and plant # but not material #.
I hope I am making sense to you guys.
Any input would be appreciated.
KhalidHello Kalyan,
Material is part of both cubes (inventory and sales) and I did flag it in multiprovider when selecting "display data" > dimensions.
I am not sure if it makes difference ... there is another cube (store planning) attached to same multiprovider ... which not feed data but as you know does not report on material level.
Do you think it could create the problem. Again (store planning) cube is not feeding data to multiprovider at the moment.
Thank You ... any other suggestion.
Khalid -
Change Work Center during production order confirmation
Dear All,
I must to modeling this situation:
I created an production order. In routing I used an work center A.
After I confirmed a half of quantity, the work center A was damaged and I must to change it, with the work center B.
The system allow this change, but when I checked the costing, the situation isn't real. The system counted the costs just for the work center A, and no for work center B.
My question is: it's possible to change the work center, during production order confirmation and the costs updated with new cost?
Thank you for your answer!
Regards,
Marianonce a Order is released, the Process order detaisl for that order is frozen.
however if you want to do it, change the order status to CRTD after reversing the Movements done.
Do READ MAster data , this will copy the new Work center , redo the previously done Moevements.
if the change is long term.
or
Just manually add the new work center and do the processing. if the change is temporary. -
Need help on Production order confirmation cancel issue
Hi,
I need your help regarding Prduction Order issue.
We have created Production Order and issued raw materials and we done paritial confirmation also. Now the order status is PNCF.
After that we notice that it was wrong confirmation so we went CO13 we cancel those confirmations.
But in our zprogram still those order is showing as paritial confirmation order.
I need in which SAP table confirmation status stored and what will be the production order status after cancel the confirmation.
and in which table cancel production order confirmation data will be availiable.
please guide me
sateeshHI,
There is No Standard Status for Reversing or cancelling the Confirmation.
Generally, When you confirm the status PCNF or CNF gets active.
When you reverse it theybecome inactive.
also let us know, whether You cancelled or reversed the confirmation or revesed the GI postings.
If you have reversed the GI postings using Reverse Movement type or Materail documents, it is possible to have the PCNF order status unchanged.
Regards
Ratan
Edited by: Ratan on Aug 28, 2009 7:23 PM -
Planned order creation with PDS valid on only order start date and not finish date
Hi All,
We have requirement to allow creation of planned order manually if production version is valid on order start date and not finish date. This is because lead time of order is longer. I refered OSS notes 385602. I could find out solution for this is implementation of OSS note 694140 to change validity mode at activity level to consider start date of first produce activity in validity interval. Problem is even If I create order in APO by implementiong this note planned order is not transfered to ECC and it gets stuck with error production version not valid.
Is there any way in ECC to control this? Any config or customization?
Regards,
SantoshNilesh,
I think there is a simple procedural skip happening in your business process. You are right when a planned order is created after MRP it would default assign it to the first available production version. 2options available for us,
1. First use transaction MF50 and do the line loading and assign the quantites to the production versions/Production lines, so that the actual capacity planning is getting completed. This way you can have planned orders with both the production versions and matching to your actual line capacity.
2. Use Quota arrangement concept, to automatically split the Planned orders during MRP for a percentage based on individual production versions.
Now when backflush is performed S225 table is updated and Planned order qty also gets reduced.
Hope this helps....
Regards,
Prasobh -
ICal Week view, Date is not aligned with the Time(schedule) of each date
Well, just like it says over there (`` ). I've recently been to China for a business trip, and I suppose the different time zone may have had something to do with the problem. Now I'm back home, changed the time zone back to normal, still the iCal shows in the weekly view that the Date on the above is not aligning with the Time and schedule. Any suggetions would be grateful!!!
Hi,
i omit the scheduling maergin key in material master,
the result of MRP is
BASIC DATES
Finish 15.10.2009
Start 14.10.2009
PRODUCTION DATES
15.02.2010 14:33:25
14.10.2009 07:00:00
scheduling type i planned order is still "backwards"
so in MD04 it is say that the goods is available at 15.10.2009 same with requirement dates.
this seem not right.
it seems that order finish date is not adjusted by lead time scheduling on "today scheduling".
Is there a way so order finish date is adjusted by lead time scheduling on "today scheduling" ????
Best regards,
Freddy Ha
Edited by: Freddy Halim on Oct 14, 2009 10:01 AM -
URGENT: Prob with Production Order Confirmation
Hi Gurus,
I have a problem with Production Order Confirmation.
When I am confirming a Prod Order and if the components present are more than '999', then error is being thrown and Material Document Number is not being created.
I want to split the records into 500 slots and pass them at a time for the creation of the Production Order so that it doesnt throw me an error while creating a Material Document No.
While saving the Production Order confirmation order, it should split the records into 500 slots each and then create Material Document No for each slot.
Can anyone please help me out in this regard, how to solve this.
Thanks & Regards,
Harish KallaHi Harish,
This problem is addressed in OSS Note : 36353
The Symptom reads like this
==========================================================================
When you post documents using the AC interface (from SD, MM or other applications), items appear in the FI document which are identical in all or in almost all fields.
This can also cause error message F5 727 ("Maximum number of items in FI reached"). The system issues this error if more than 999 items occur in an FI document.
===========================================================================
This Note is an elaborate one..
Hence, go through this and ask your FI Consultant to help you in this regard.
All the best..
Regards,
Siva -
Batch Determination at the time of Production Order Confirmation
Hi,
I am working with Batch Determination at Item Level.
I already have configured system to generate Batch Automatically at the Time of Production Order Release.
But now i want to generate Batch Automatically at the Time of Production Order Confirmation
Please help me with the necessary Configurations which would be required into achieving the same.
Thanks in advance.
HarrisHi,
I have maintained the same for my Order Type in OPJ2 but still the same is not being picked at the time of Order Confirmation and it is being put to COGI mentioning the error as No batch specified in production order
Also if i try to Manually Select the Batch through in Goods Movt. of CO15 it is giving a msg that No Strategy could be found.
I have done following settings:
1. Have maintained Condn Records in MBC1 for the component whose batch is to be determined.
2. In material master in MRP2 Batch Determination: 2
3. In OPL8: Batch determination search procedure
4. In OPJ2: BD ticked for that relevant Order Type
5. In OPKP: Automatic Batch creation kept as BLANK.
Please support
Thanks
Harris -
User Exit for Production Order confirmation with CO15
Hi All,
what User Exit I should use when validating batch when we do Production Order confirmation with CO15.
Not when we create or release a Production Order.
Will reward,
mindaugas
Edited by: Mindaugas Kazlauskas on Jan 30, 2008 5:03 PMHi
The Follwing Userexits available:
Transaction Code - CO15 Enter Production order Confirmation
Enhancement/ Business Add-in Description
Enhancement
CONFPP01
PP order conf.: Determine customer specific default values
CONFPP02
PP order conf.: Customer specific input checks 1
CONFPP03
PP order conf.: Cust. specific check after op. selection
CONFPP04
PP order conf.: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPP05
PP order conf.: Customer specific enhancements when saving
CONFPP06
PP Order Confirmations: Actual Data Transfer
CONFPP07
Single Screen Entry: Inclusion of User-Defined Subscreens
CONFPS01
PS confirmation: Determine customer specific default values
CONFPS02
PS confirmation: Customer specific input checks 1
CONFPS03
PS confirmation: Customer specific check after op. selection
CONFPS04
PS confirmation: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPS05
PS confirmation: Customer specific enhancements when saving
CONF0001
Enhancements in order confirmation
CONFPI01
Process order conf.: Calculate cust.specific default values
CONFPI02
Process order confirmation: Customer spec. input checks 1
CONFPI03
Process order conf.: Cust. spec. check after op. selection
CONFPI04
Process order conf.: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPI05
Process order conf.: Cust. spec. enhancements when saving
CONFPI06
Process order confirmation: Actual data transfer
CONFPM01
PM/SM order conf.: Determine cust. specific default values
CONFPM02
PM/SM order confirmation: Customer specific input checks 1
CONFPM03
PM/SM order conf.: Cust. spec. check after op. selection
CONFPM04
PM/SM order conf.: Customer specific input check 2
CONFPM05
PM/SM order conf.: Cust. specific enhancements when saving
If it is helpful rewards points.
Regards
Pratp.M -
Production order confirmation with BAPI
Dear PP friends,
I want to create a program to confirm production orders in mass at header level like CO15. To do it I am trying to use BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR and it works fine for planned backflush.
However, I am not able to change data of goods movement (quantity, warehouse and batch). Is it possible?
What is the function of GOODSMOVEMENTS table?
I studied the following thread but I could not solve it.
Production Order Confirmation BAPI
Does anyone have suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
MarcosHi Caetano,
Thanks for your reply.
I tested BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GET_HDR_PROP and it proposes goods movements according with open quantity of the production order. In this case, would I have to adjust all movements with actual quantity?
Is possible to propose goods movements according with confirmed quantity?
Regards,
Marcos
Maybe you are looking for
-
Adding user defined field in print layout design of Bill of matrial Report
I want to add "Drawing No" which is user defined field in Bill of Material report need immediate help .
-
Method not found error when creating COM object
i am trying to initiate a COM object with CF and Imagemagick on windows 2003. when i initiate the object i get the error "The selected method convert was not found." if i do a dump of the method in the COM object but i cant call it. what am i missing
-
Can I get rid of a windows partition on a MacBook running 10.4.11 without having bootcamp or bootcamp beta? If so, how?
-
Hide the table view in OBIEE 11g
Hi All, The requirement is to hide the table view and display only the export link on the Dashboard. This could be achieved in 10g by inserting display:none CSS style in each column property. Tried the same in 11.1.1.3, the data is hidden but it stil
-
Issues nokia 7610 supernova sort text messages
Dear All, I own a Nokia 7610 supernova ( product code # 0564323 ) and I'm experiencing a weird behavior after restoring its content backup. I did a full phone backup through Nokia PC Suite 7.1.26.0 before installing the latest firmware available for