Public constructor problem

I am getting the following error
The applet orderproc.NewUser does not have a public constructor orderproc.NewUser()
I dont understand this as the rest of my applets have similar code but dont get this problem. Can any of you nice people out there help. Here is my code:
package orderproc;
import java.lang.*;
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
import javax.swing.*;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.Statement;
import java.sql.DriverManager;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.net.URL;
import java.sql.*;
* <p>Title: </p>
* <p>Description: </p>
* <p>Copyright: Copyright (c) 2003</p>
* <p>Company: </p>
* @author unascribed
* @version 1.0
public class NewUser extends JApplet implements ActionListener {
JPanel westPanel;
JPanel eastPanel;
JLabel lblFirstName, lblLastName, lblPassword, lblUserName;
JTextField txtFirstName,txtLastName,txtUserName, txtPassword;
JButton btnSubmit, btnBack, btnCancel;
String FN,LN,PS,UID;
public NewUser()
GridBagLayout gbl;
GridBagConstraints gbc;
gbl = new GridBagLayout();
gbc = new GridBagConstraints();
westPanel = new JPanel();
westPanel.setLayout(gbl);
eastPanel = new JPanel();
eastPanel.setLayout(gbl);
getContentPane().setLayout(new BorderLayout());
getContentPane().add(westPanel, BorderLayout.CENTER);
getContentPane().add(eastPanel, BorderLayout.SOUTH);
lblFirstName = new JLabel("First Name: ");
lblLastName = new JLabel("Last Name: ");
lblPassword = new JLabel("Password: ");
lblPassword = new JLabel("User Name: ");
txtFirstName = new JTextField(15);
txtPassword = new JTextField(15);
txtLastName = new JTextField(15);
txtUserName = new JTextField(15);
btnSubmit = new JButton("Submit");
btnSubmit.addActionListener(this);
eastPanel.add(btnSubmit);
btnCancel = new JButton("Cancel");
btnCancel.addActionListener(this);
eastPanel.add(btnCancel);
btnBack = new JButton("<<<<Back");
btnBack.addActionListener(this);
eastPanel.add(btnBack);
gbc.anchor = GridBagConstraints.NORTH; // Align labels
gbc.gridx = 1;
gbc.gridy = 1;
gbl.setConstraints(lblFirstName, gbc);
westPanel.add(lblFirstName);
gbc.gridx = 1;
gbc.gridy = 2;
gbl.setConstraints(lblLastName, gbc);
westPanel.add(lblLastName);
gbc.gridx = 1;
gbc.gridy = 3;
gbl.setConstraints(lblPassword, gbc);
westPanel.add(lblPassword);
gbc.gridx = 1;
gbc.gridy = 4;
gbl.setConstraints(lblUserName, gbc);
westPanel.add(lblUserName);
gbc.anchor = GridBagConstraints.NORTHWEST;
gbc.gridx = 2;
gbc.gridy = 1;
gbl.setConstraints(txtFirstName, gbc);
txtFirstName.setEditable(true);
westPanel.add(txtFirstName);
gbc.gridx = 2;
gbc.gridy = 2;
gbl.setConstraints(txtLastName, gbc);
txtPassword.setEditable(true);
westPanel.add(txtLastName);
gbc.gridx = 2;
gbc.gridy = 3;
gbl.setConstraints(txtPassword, gbc);
txtPassword.setEditable(true);
westPanel.add(txtPassword);
gbc.gridx = 2;
gbc.gridy = 4;
gbl.setConstraints(txtUserName, gbc);
txtUserName.setEditable(true);
westPanel.add(txtUserName);
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ae) // Action event handling
if(ae.getSource() == btnBack)
setVisible(false);
else if(ae.getSource() == btnCancel)
txtFirstName.setText(null);
txtPassword.setText(null);
txtLastName.setText(null);
txtUserName.setText(null);
else if(ae.getSource() == btnSubmit)
FN = txtFirstName.getText();
LN = txtLastName.getText();
PS = txtPassword.getText();
UID = txtUserName.getText();
try
//connect to database
Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
System.out.println("Drivers loaded");
String url = "jdbc:odbc:wms";
Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection(url,"root","");
System.out.println("Connection established");
Statement stmt = con.createStatement();
System.out.println("Statement created");
ResultSet res = stmt.executeQuery("INSERT INTO login (FirstName, LastName, Password, UserName) VALUES ('"+FN+"','"+LN+"', '"+PS+"','"+UID+"')");
con.close();
catch(Exception e)
txtFirstName.setText(null);
txtLastName.setText(null);
txtPassword.setText(null);
txtUserName.setText(null);
public void init()
NewUser myNewUser = new NewUser();

Why don't you just implement the RSAPrivateKey and RSAPublicKey interfaces?

Similar Messages

  • Applet - JavaPurse does not have a public constructor

    Hello,
    I'm starting playing with Javacard and I tried to compile a demo of Java purse Applet.
    I can compile it withou problem but once I try to start it with JBuilder 2006 I get the following error :
    The applet com.sun.javacard.samples.JavaPurse.JavaPurse does not have a public constructor com.sun.javacard.samples.JavaPurse.JavaPurse()
    Here is a part of my code
    public class JavaPurse extends javacard.framework.Applet {
    protected JavaPurse(byte[] bArray, short bOffset, byte bLength) {
    public static void install(byte[] bArray, short bOffset, byte bLength) {
    new JavaPurse(bArray, bOffset, bLength);
    Does anyone of you know why JBuilder is displaying this error message?
    Thanks in advance fo you reply.
    Alain.

    I don't think that's the error message; there is no class "java.awt.Applet". Are you sure it doesn't say "java.applet.Applet"?
    In any event, I don't know about javacard, but I suspect that javacard applets are not interchangeable with browser applets. My guess is that when JBuilder tries to build an applet, it's thinking about browser applets. Therefore it expects your applet to be a subclass of java.applet.Applet.
    I don't know how JBuilder works, but perhaps you can try using normal compilation instead of whatever JBuilder provides for applets.

  • GetCodeBase() generates "does not have a public constructor"

    I've been searching the net for days, and I seem to be the only guy with this problem. Here's the simple code:
    public class testapplet extends JApplet {
    public testapplet() {
    URL url = getCodeBase();
    I get the error message:
    The applet testapplet does not have a public constructor testapplet()
    I once had the same error message, but it was an entirely different problem. At that time, I made an JMenu[2] and somewhere in the code addressed JMenu[3];
    As I said, this has nothing to do with my current problem, but I get VERY frustrated when I get such an error.
    I'm running JBuilder6 on Win XP. Please help! desperate cry

    Damn, it helped. O_O Thanks a lot! As you can tell, I'm new to this. I was surprised since in my other program, I wrote a lot of stuff without that init procedure and it worked...
    Thanks again!

  • Public Constructor in atg

    Hi ,
    i was going through the doc Public Constructor , why constructor without args is needed in creating a nucleus component. i create a component like
    Test.java
    name;
    getxx();
    setxx();
    Test.properties
    name=Kavi
    when i went to dyn/admin im able to see the value 'Kavi' under name property in Test Component,then what is the need of a default constructor.Please add your inputs
    Regards
    G.KaviMani

    Hi Joe,
    Oracle ATG Web Commerce - Public Constructor with No Arguments
    Public Constructor with No Arguments
    Nucleus can create a component automatically from a properties file if the component class is declared public and it implements a public constructor with no arguments. For example:
    public class Person {
      public Person () {}
    The constructor is not required to be empty. However, as shown later in this chapter, it is often a good idea to defer initialization functions until after the component starts.
    If the constructor for the component class requires arguments, you will need to supply additional information. See Parameterized Constructors.
    So this means the above highlighted statement is not mandatory correct ?? Pls correct me if am wrong.
    Regards
    G.KaviMani

  • ERROR:The applet Tennisball does not have a public constructor Tennisball()

    hi all...sorry...i encountered this java error msg with the following code.....n the error msg tat was generated is that i do not have a public constructor which i already have...can some1 please enlighten me..??
    import java.applet.*;
    import java.awt.*;
    public class Tennisball
         double x, y, oldx, oldy, xinc, yinc, v=2.0;
         int i,e,west,north,east,south,ry,rs,score,rx;
         int choice, zone;
         AudioClip ballout;
         boolean running,toggle,enough;
            Color ballcolor;
         Tennis t;
         Color bgColor = Color.black;
         public Tennisball(int w, int n, int e, int s, AudioClip bo)
                    west=w;
              east=e;
              south=s;
              north=n;
              ballout = bo;
              //this.t = t;
              xinc=1.7*v;
              yinc=0.7*v;
         public void getRacketPosition(int racket_y)
              ry=racket_y;
              rs=ry;
         public void newBall()
              ballcolor=Color.yellow;
              x=20;
              y=(int)(Math.random()*100+50);
              int angle=(int)(Math.random()*8+1);
              if(angle==1)yinc=-0.7*v;
              if(angle==2)yinc=-0.5*v;
              if(angle==3)yinc=-0.4*v;
              if(angle==4)yinc=-0.3*v;
              if(angle==5)yinc=0.3*v;
              if(angle==6)yinc=0.4*v;
              if(angle==7)yinc=0.5*v;
              if(angle==8)yinc=0.7*v;
              toggle=false;
              running=true;
              enough=false;
              e=0;
         public void move()
              if(running)
                   if(!toggle)
                        oldx=x;
                        oldy=y;
                        x+=xinc*v;
                        y+=yinc*v;
                   if(x<west && xinc<0)
                        int angle=(int)(Math.random()*8+1);
                        if(angle==1)yinc=-0.7*v;
                        if(angle==2)yinc=-0.5*v;
                        if(angle==3)yinc=-0.4*v;
                        if(angle==4)yinc=-0.3*v;
                        if(angle==5)yinc=0.3*v;
                        if(angle==6)yinc=0.4*v;
                        if(angle==7)yinc=0.5*v;
                        if(angle==8)yinc=0.7*v;
                       xinc=-xinc;
                        t.playClick();
                   else if(x>east-10)
                        x=east-10;
                        toggle=true;
                        running=false;
                        score++;
                        t.playBallout();
                   else if(y<north || y>south)
                       if(y<north&&yinc<0)
                             yinc=-yinc;
                        if(y>south&&yinc>0)
                             yinc=-yinc;
                        t.playClick();
                   else if(x>425 && xinc>0 && y>ry && y<rs+25)
                        if(y<ry+3)zone=1;
                        else if(y>=ry+3&&y<ry+6)zone=2;
                        else if(y>=ry+6&&y<ry+9)zone=3;
                        else if(y>=ry+9&&y<ry+12)zone=4;
                        else if(y>=ry+12&&y<ry+15)zone=5;
                        else if(y>=ry+15&&y<ry+18)zone=6;
                        else if(y>=ry+18&&y<ry+21)zone=7;
                        else if(y>=ry+21)zone=8;
                        if(zone==1)yinc=-0.7*v;
                        if(zone==2)yinc=-0.5*v;
                        if(zone==3)yinc=-0.4*v;
                        if(zone==4)yinc=-0.3*v;
                        if(zone==5)yinc=0.3*v;
                        if(zone==6)yinc=0.4*v;
                        if(zone==7)yinc=0.5*v;
                        if(zone==8)yinc=0.7*v;
                        xinc=-xinc;
                        t.playClick();
         public void toggle()
                        int i=t.j;
                        if(!enough)
                             if(i>-1&&i<11)ballcolor=Color.yellow;
                             if(i>10&&i<20){ballcolor=bgColor;e++;}
                        if (e>35){ballcolor=bgColor;enough=true;}
         public void paint(Graphics g)
              if(toggle)toggle();
              g.setColor(ballcolor);
              g.fillOval((int)x,(int)y,10,10);
    }

    I thought I should point out a few things
    The rule is that every class should have a no
    argument constructor that you need to specify
    explicitly if you have overloaded the default one.
    One of the reaons for that is the following:This is not true, there are many classes that do not have a no argument constructor (For example Integer). Integer is a perfect example of why you would not want a no argument constructor, having an Integer with no value is pointless (theres nothing you can do with it).
    public class A {
    private final int a ;
    public A(int b) {
    this.a = b ;
    }Now you realize that the variable
    n
    is getting initialized in the constructor. I see no variable n in the constructor but I take it you mean a
    Now if you
    refer to
    n
    somewhere else in you code you get a compile error because
    n
    might not have been initialized.This is not true, only local variables can cause a
    variable (a variable) might not have been initialized
    this is because all member fields are initialised with their default valuse. For example all pointers are intitialised to null, ints are intitialised to 0, booleans to false and so on.
    >
    So you need this:
    public class A {
    private final int a ;
    public A(int b) {
    this.a = b ;
    public A() {
    this(0) ; /* Calls the above constructor with some
    default parameter. */
    /* You can add some more code below but not above
    this(0) */
    Of course you know you are never calling the default
    constructor but it's still there so you need to
    ensure that the variables get initialized if some one
    calls it!
    As above classes can have no argument constructors
    Just add this to your code for example:
    public Tennisball() {
    this(0, 0, 0, 0, null) ;
    } Hope that helped you out!
    Thanks,
    Nikolas.
    PS any duke dollars would be much appreciated as i'm
    very poor at the moment :-)I dont mean to be offensive just thought I should clarify these points
    Michael

  • Default class with public constructor - why?

    Noticed some code that had a class with package-level access and a public constructor - wondered what the benefit/use of that would be... Thanks!

    GarudaJava wrote:
    Noticed some code that had a class with package-level access and a public constructor - wondered what the benefit/use of that would be... Thanks!If the class itself doesn't need to be exposed, but it implements some interface, and is assumed to have a public no-arg consturctor, it could be created reflexively. This is a contrived situation, but it's the only one I can think of in Java where that'd be useful.
    package foo;
    class Foo implements SomeInterface {
      public Foo() {
    package factory;
    class Factory {
      public static SomeInterface create(Class<? extends SomeInterface> clazz) { // not sure if I got the generics right, but they're incidendtal to the example
        return clazz.newInstance();
    package foo;
    import factory.Factory;
    public class Bar {
      public void bar() {
        SomeInterface si = Factory.create(Foo.class);
        si.doStuff();
    }Like I said, pretty contrived, and I can't think of a real-world use case that matches it offhand, but structurally it'd look something like that.
    You could also maybe imagine that the factory package might do more than just create and return an instance. It might create it and use that SomeInterface type for its own ends.

  • No public constructor, why?

    The Pattern and Matcher classes in in java.uti.regex package do not have public constructors. Instead, an object for those classes can be retrieved by invoking their static methods, Pattern.compile() and Matcher.matcher() respectively.
    What is the reason? Why do they not have public constructor?
    It is not clearly an implementation of Singleton Pattern which is characterized by getInstance() method.
    Thanks in advance

    sosododo wrote:
    The Pattern and Matcher classes in in java.uti.regex package do not have public constructors. Instead, an object for those classes can be retrieved by invoking their static methods, Pattern.compile() and Matcher.matcher() respectively.
    What is the reason? Why do they not have public constructor?
    It is not clearly an implementation of Singleton Pattern which is characterized by getInstance() method.
    Thanks in advancePlease be aware that the singleton pattern is not characterized by a getInstance method (which is in fact a factory method) and nor is the presence of a method called getInstance any indicator of a singleton. Here is a perfectly valid (and more thread-safe) implementation of the singleton pattern
    public class ASingleton {
    public static final ASingleton INSTANCE = new ASingleton();
      private ASingleton() {}
    }Not a getInstance in sight

  • Constructor problem with super keyword

    When I try to compile this class, I get 1 error:
    C:\Program Files\Xinox Software\JCreatorV3\MyProjects\FixedDiameterCircle.java:6: cannot resolve symbol
    symbol : constructor CircleGUI (int)
    location: class CircleGUI
    super(100);
    ^
    1 error
    class FixedDiameterCircle extends CircleGUI
         FixedDiameterCircle()
              super(100);     
         }//end FixedDiameterCircle()
    public void setDiameter(int d)
    }//end class FixedDiameterCircle
    ---------Here's the CircleGUI.java-------
    import javax.swing.*; //import Swing components
    import java.awt.*; //import awt components
    import java.awt.event.*; //import event handlers
    public class CircleGUI implements ActionListener
    JTextField diameter = new JTextField(3); //text field for first name
    JTextField color = new JTextField(5); //text field for last name
    JButton button = new JButton("Draw"); //update button
    JPanel panel = new JPanel(); //panel for frame content pane
    JFrame frame = new JFrame("Draw"); //frame for window + title
    public CircleGUI()
    panel.add(new JLabel("Diameter")); //add a label to panel
    panel.add(diameter); //add first to panel
    panel.add(new JLabel("Color")); //add another label to panel
    panel.add(color); //add a last to panel
    button.addActionListener(this); //add a click listener to button
    panel.add(button); //add button to panel
    frame.setContentPane(panel); //set panel as frame's content
    frame.setSize(120, 120); //set frame size (width, height)
    frame.setVisible(true); //make frame visible
    }//end CircleGUI()
    public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e)//executed when button is clicked
    int d = Integer.parseInt(diameter.getText()); //get diameter
    Circle circle; //declare Circle variable
    if(color.getText().length() == 0) //if no color entered in field
    {                                       //use JColorChooser below
    Color rgb = JColorChooser.showDialog(frame, "Choose a Color", null);
    if(rgb != null) //if Color rgb chosen
    circle = new Circle(d,rgb); //instantiate Circle from Color
    }//end if(color...
    else
    String c = color.getText(); //get color String
    circle = new Circle(d,c); //instantiate Circle from String
    }//end else
    }//end actionPerformed()
    public static void main(String[] args) //main method
    CircleGUI cGUI = new CircleGUI(); //instantiate CircleGUI
    }//end main()
    }//end class CircleGUI
    What's the problem?

    CircleGUI does not have a constructor that takes an int. You need to either add this to CircleGui:public CircleGui(int diameter) { /* do stuff */ } or just cal super() instead of super(int). Which one is better is left as an exercise for the reader.

  • The applet FtpExample does not have a public constructor FtpExample()

    Hi
    Get this from my Jbuilder, but I got an constructor. What's the problem ?
    import ftp.*;
    import java.io.*;
    import java.applet.*;
    class FtpExample implements FtpObserver, Runnable
    Thread thread;
    FtpBean ftp;
    long num_of_bytes = 0;
    public FtpExample()
    // Create a new FtpBean object.
    ftp = new FtpBean();
    try {
    jbInit();
    } catch (Exception ex) {
    ex.printStackTrace();
    // Connect to a ftp server.
    public void connect()
    try
    ftp.ftpConnect("xxxxxxxxxxxx", "xxxxxxx", "xxxxxxx");
    } catch(Exception e)
    System.out.println(e);
    and more...
    .

    I thought I should point out a few things
    The rule is that every class should have a no
    argument constructor that you need to specify
    explicitly if you have overloaded the default one.
    One of the reaons for that is the following:This is not true, there are many classes that do not have a no argument constructor (For example Integer). Integer is a perfect example of why you would not want a no argument constructor, having an Integer with no value is pointless (theres nothing you can do with it).
    public class A {
    private final int a ;
    public A(int b) {
    this.a = b ;
    }Now you realize that the variable
    n
    is getting initialized in the constructor. I see no variable n in the constructor but I take it you mean a
    Now if you
    refer to
    n
    somewhere else in you code you get a compile error because
    n
    might not have been initialized.This is not true, only local variables can cause a
    variable (a variable) might not have been initialized
    this is because all member fields are initialised with their default valuse. For example all pointers are intitialised to null, ints are intitialised to 0, booleans to false and so on.
    >
    So you need this:
    public class A {
    private final int a ;
    public A(int b) {
    this.a = b ;
    public A() {
    this(0) ; /* Calls the above constructor with some
    default parameter. */
    /* You can add some more code below but not above
    this(0) */
    Of course you know you are never calling the default
    constructor but it's still there so you need to
    ensure that the variables get initialized if some one
    calls it!
    As above classes can have no argument constructors
    Just add this to your code for example:
    public Tennisball() {
    this(0, 0, 0, 0, null) ;
    } Hope that helped you out!
    Thanks,
    Nikolas.
    PS any duke dollars would be much appreciated as i'm
    very poor at the moment :-)I dont mean to be offensive just thought I should clarify these points
    Michael

  • Instantiation attempted on a non-constructor problem

    Hi,
    I've got the following error in my application: "TypeError: Error #1007: Instantiation attempted on a non-constructor".
    I've created a class that represents a 2D Vector. But when I instanciate it inside another class, I get this error.
    Here is a little piece of code of my problem:
    public class Player extends MovieClip {
              private var position:Vector = new Vector();
              public function Player() {
                        // constructor code
    public class Vector {
              public var xValue:Number;
              public var yValue:Number;
              public function Vector() {
                        // constructor code
                        xValue = 0;
                        yValue = 0;
    These 2 classes are in separated files. The Player's class is a Movie Clip in the library, while Vector's class is just a class file. What can I be doing wrong?

    Vector is a native top level class in AS3.

  • Rectangle constructor problem

    Ok, i've seen a couple posts on this in other threads, but it seemed like people were asking for you guys to complete their homework for them. This is an assignment calling for us to construct 2 rectangles, modify the second, then verify that the first remained unaltered. This is my main code here:
    public static void main(String[] args)
              // Creates object "rectangle A"
              Rectangle rectangleA = new Rectangle();
              // Tests rectangle A's components
              System.out.println("Rectangle A's componenets are as follows:");
              System.out.println("Height: " + rectangleA.getHeight());
              System.out.println("Width: " + rectangleA.getWidth());
              System.out.println("Color: " + rectangleA.getColor());
              // Creates object "rectangle B"
              Rectangle rectangleB = new Rectangle(2, 2, "Blue");
              // Tests rectangle B's components
              System.out.println('\n' + "Rectangle B's components are as follows:");
              System.out.println("Height: " + rectangleB.getHeight());
              System.out.println("Width: " + rectangleB.getWidth());
              System.out.println("Width: " + rectangleB.getColor());
              // Checks setComponent methods on rectangle B for functionality
              rectangleB.setHeight(3);
              rectangleB.setWidth(4);
              rectangleB.setColor("Azul");
              // Checks the changes to rectangle B
              System.out.println('\n' + "Rectangle B's new components are as follows:");
              System.out.println("Height: " + rectangleB.getHeight());
              System.out.println("Width: " + rectangleB.getWidth());
              System.out.println("Color: " + rectangleB.getColor());
              // Prints components of rectangle A to verify that it has remained unaltered
              System.out.println('\n' + "Rectangle A's components are still:");
              System.out.println("Height: " + rectangleA.getHeight());
              System.out.println("Width: " + rectangleA.getWidth());
              System.out.println("Color: " + rectangleA.getColor());
    }Here is the second class, including the completed (as correct as I could come haha) rectangle constructors and methods:
    public class Rectangle
         private double width = 1;
         private double height = 1;
         private static String color = "White";
         public Rectangle()
         public Rectangle(double width, double height, String color)
              this.width = width;
              this.height = height;
              this.color = color;
         public double getWidth()
              return width;
         public void setWidth(double width)
              this.width = width;
         public double getHeight()
              return height;
         public void setHeight(double height)
              this.height = height;
         public static String getColor()
              return color;
         public static void setColor(String color)
              Rectangle.color = color;
         public double findArea()
              return (this.getHeight() * this.getWidth());
    }We are supposed to use each rectangle constructor once, then use a series of print statements to check each method/constructor in the Rectangle class. I will add findArea to the main class later.
    So... my problem is that the second rectangle object's "color" property is messing with the first rectangle's color as well, when I run the program, rectangle A ends up with a color of "Azul" instead of "White."
    Any ideas?

    Ok, after reading the link, static is a class variable, meaning that it encompasses the whole class, and any alteration to it sticks. Any reference to it after that will return the new value, as it is supposed to. So, how can I temporarily change the color without reassigning it to the whole class? The instructor intentionally made it static, so I think he meant for us to try to work around that.
    Looking back at my code, I am, indeed, changing the variable itself, rather than a property of the current object. it seems to me the problem lies within this bit of code.
    public static void setColor(String color)
              Rectangle.color = color;
         }Message was edited by:
    mchenj

  • Constructor-problem

    public class Three extends Two {
         public static void main(String args[])
              new Three();
    public class Two extends One{
         public Two()
              this(5);
              System.out.println("Constructor of class Two");
         public Two(int x)
              System.out.println("Value of x is   "+x);
    public class One {
         public One()
              System.out.println("Constructor of class One");
    If we do not create any zero argument constructor then the JVM creates one for us and the calls the constructor of the superclass(if any) using super(); and if we do create a zero argument constructor and do not specify super() then it is automatically called.--Is this correct
    If so, when I run class Threethen class Two constructor should be called which calls another constructor of class Two and in this case JVM should not be able to call Parent Constructor One using super() since we have already placed this(5) in the first line of the constructor and I believe super and this cannot be used together.
    So how does constructor of class One get called.

    If we do not create any zero argument constructor
    then the JVM creates one for us and the calls the
    constructor of the superclass(if any) using super();
    and if we do create a zero argument constructor and
    do not specify super() then it is automatically
    called.--Is this correct Mostly. The compiler creates the ctor, I think, not the VM. And it only gets created if you didn't define any ctors for that class.
    Regardless of what ctors you have or have not created, super() will be implicitly called as the first statement of each ctor unless that ctor's first statemen is a call to a super() or a this() ctor (with or without args).
    and in
    this case JVM should not be able to call Parent
    Constructor One using super() since we
    have already placed this(5) in the first line
    of the constructor and I believe super and
    this cannot be used together.Incorrect.
    Three() calls Two() calls Two(5) calls One().
    Constructor rules:
    1) Every class has at least one ctor.
    1.1) If you do not define an explicit constructor for your class, the compiler provides a implicit constructor that takes no args and simply calls super().
    1.2) If you do define one or more explicit constructors, regardless of whether they take args, then the compiler no longer provides the implicit no-arg ctor. In this case, you must explicitly define a public MyClass() {...} if you want one.
    1.3) Constructors are not inherited.
    2) The first statement in the body of any ctor is either a call to a superclass ctor super(...) or a call to another ctor of this class this(...) 2.1) If you do not explicitly put a call to super(...) or this(...) as the first statement in a ctor that you define, then the compiler implicitly inserts a call to super's no-arg ctor super() as the first call. The implicitly called ctor is always super's no-arg ctor, regardless of whether the currently running ctor takes args.
    2.2) There is always exactly one call to either super(...) or this(...) in each constructor, and it is always the first call. You can't put in more than one, and if you put one in, the compiler's implicitly provided one is removed.

  • Constructor problems

    >
    1. Create an integer to hold the suit of the card. You can use the constants that have been defined for you to represent the four suits, hearts, spades, clubs and diamonds.
    2. Create an integer to hold the rank of the card. A card's rank is a number from 1 to 13 with 1 being an ace and 13 being a king.
    3. The constructor for the Card class has a single parameter which is an integer between 0 and 51 (inclusive). You should initialise the suit and rank from the parameter whose
    value is interpreted as follows; 0 represents the ace of hearts, 1 represents the 2 of hearts,. . . , 12 represents the king of hearts, 13 represents the ace of clubs, 14 represents the two of clubs, . . . , 25 represents the king of clubs, 26 represents the ace of diamonds, 27 represents the two of diamonds, . . . , 38 represents the king of diamonds, 39 represents
    the ace of spades, 40 represents the two of spades, . . . , 51 represents the king of spades.
    My code so far ( it doesnt work, im just trying to get my head around what i need to do)
    public class Card
        // Don't change these four constants
        private static final int HEARTS = 1;
        private static final int CLUBS = 2;
        private static final int DIAMONDS = 3;
        private static final int SPADES = 4;
        // write the your code below this line...
        //Holds suit of card
        private int suit = hearts, spades, clubs, diamonds;
        //Holds rank of card
        private int rank = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13;
         * Constructor
        public Card(int amount)
                0 == aceOfHearts;
                1 == 2OfHearts;
                12 == kingOFHearts;
                13 == aceOfClubs;
                14 == 2OfClubs;
                25 == kingOfClubs;
                26 == aceOfDiamonds;
                27 == 2OfDiamonds;
                38 == kingOfDiamonds;
                39 == aceOfSpades;
                40 == 2OfSpades;
                51 == kingOfSpades;
    }I dont get this part *"You should initialise the suit and rank from the parameter whose value is interpreted as follows..."* the rank has already been intialised to a number from 1 to 13 right? how to i intialise both the rank and suit together?

    CheekyChop wrote:
    haha id say i wish he didnt make the first part of the assignment so tricky to understand the rest of it looks fine!
    could anyone provide some pseudo code?
    is this anywhere near right
    public Card(int result)
    mySuit = suit[result];
    myRank = rank[result];
    }Edited by: CheekyChop on Nov 16, 2008 1:49 PMThat's not how I would do it. If you read my post above...
    Dividing that number in the constructor by the number of card values (13) will give you a number (0 to 3) representing the suit of the card, and the remainder from that division will give you the card value. ;-)... you might get something like this...
    public Card(int value)
       suit = value / 13; //0=hearts, 1=clubs, 2=diamonds, 3=aces
       rank = value % 13; //the remainder of value/13; a number from 0 to 12
    }Edited by: chickenmeister on Nov 16, 2008 8:40 PM

  • A constructor problem ,please help!

    class a
    int x;
    int y;
    a(int a,int b)
    x=a;
    y=b;
    class b extends a
    public class test
    public static void main (String args[])
    a test=new a(1,2);
    System.out.println(test.x);
    System.out.println(test.y);
    cannot resolve symbol
    symbol : constructor a ()
    location: class a
    class b extends a
    ^
    1 error

    You don't declare any constructor in class b, therefor the compiler will add the no-arg constructor to it, which will try to call a no-arg constructor in class a:
    class b extends a {
    public b() {
      super();
    }But notice, that you have a constructor in a that takes two int arguments, so in class b, you have to make a constructor which will call super(i1, i2), where i1 and i2 are integers.
    How come you extend class a anyway? The example you gave, indicates you don't need to extend class a in b.

  • After revoked UTL_FILE from PUBLIC, found problem...

    Hi All
    I created new role that is "UTL_PUBLIC" and granted below package to new role and grant new role to all users in database after that revoke below roles from PUBLIC.
    UTL_FILE
    UTL_TCP
    UTL_SMTP
    UTL_HTTP
    DBMS_LOB
    DBMS_SQL
    DBMS_JOB
    DBMS_SCHEDULER
    DBMS_XMLGEN
    But I got the problem when export data that show about package error. So I granted above package back to PUBLIC and export again that was work.
    My question is Can I grant above package to new role and grant to db user instead of PUBLIC role? If yes, How will I do ? If no, please explain the reason.
    Thank you,
    Hiko

    Oracle support confirmed about this already.
    I cannot grant privilege execute on those packages via roles that will have troubles with procedures and packages.
    Only one solution, I must grant to users directly.
    Thank you
    Hiko

Maybe you are looking for

  • REP in Oracle Database

    Hi, I have REP report. Using this generating PDF output for Orders. Is it possible to run the REP file in Oracle Database procedure. If yes please suggest how to do. Please do the needful. Below are the versions: Forms and Reports : 10g version Edite

  • Scorecards and Dashboards

    Scorecards and Dashboards According to Harvard Business Review, Balanced Scorecard concept is the most influential management idea in the past 75 years. The performance of an organization is tracked against four key perspectives such as Finance, Cust

  • Sending mail smtp vs exchange without outlook mailbox opened

    We have an application published via Citrix Xenapp 6.5 on win2k8r2 servers which uses server-side Outlook for composing/sending mail.  The user does a one time setup of the Outlook profile through a Citrix published Outlook.exe.  After the setup thei

  • Global Event Listeners for all Views in a ViewNavigatorApplication

    Hello, As the subject states, I have a ViewNavigatorApplication and I am trying to set up a "global" event listener for all views. Which I am able to do, however I am having problems... In my first view, I assign this listener: NativeApplication.nati

  • Sainsbury voucher not arrived

    Hi, My 1st post here. Here goes. I am yet to receive my voucher which was stated that I would get it within 30 days. Still yet to arrive. I have contacted customer service a number of times only to be passed all around the place, even in live chat. T