Query-based taxonomy doesn't work

Hi,
I created a query-based taxonomy in the index of a folder. Then in Content Management - Classification I set the Category and query of the taxonomy. However, documents that meet the query cannot be classified into that category - they are still in Documents to Classify. It's the same with example-based taxonomy.
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Ray

Hi Ray,
To work with this kind of taxonomy you must do:
1. Create index using classification service.
2. Create taxonomy based in query.
3. If you click in this taxonomy you can create new folders where documents will be stored (as result of classification, logical links).
4. In Content Management->Classification->Taxonomy Query Builder->choose the taxonomy created in step 2 and
create a search query for a category in a query-based taxonomy.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/77/49523ec744d947e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Patricio.

Similar Messages

Error while creating Query based taxonomy.

Hi,
I have created an index and trying to build a query based taxonomy though
Taxonomy Query Builder in content management. Earlier I have created
another index but after that I have deleted it but still while trying to build a query based
taxonomy it is giving an error that earlier index doesn't exist and not diaplaying the new
index and taxonomy that I have created. Taxonomy Trainer is working fine.
Please suggest to resolve this problem.
Thanks,
Deepika

Hi,
did u created the taxonomy in the new index are you imported.
Generally once you delete an index and you try to create an index with the same name wil give error. This may be because of the cache problem. Try to restart the server. Hope that may help you.
Raghu

Query Based Taxonomy - Dynamic Creation of a Query Problem

Hi,
I'm trying to create new category nodes in a taxonomy and to assing them queries. I know how to do this, but I encountered a strange behavior. Here is the situation:
I have a string property DocumentType. When manualy creating a query, it looks like:
DocumentType CONTAINS "Some string"
But when I do the same using code I get:
DocumentType IS "Some string"
And as a result of this, the taxanomy is not working properly.
Here is the code:
     indexService =
     (IIndexService) ResourceFactory
     .getInstance()
     .getServiceFactory()
     .getService(
     IServiceTypesConst.INDEX_SERVICE);
     //        This kind of classification index offers functionality working with query based taxonomies
     qbcIndex = (IQBClassificationIndex) indexService.getIndex(indexId);
     //        Get a query folder - a query folder is a representation of a query based taxonomies category
     queryFolder = qbcIndex.getQueryFolder(RID.getRID(folder));
     //        List of IQueryEntry objects for the query folder
     queryEntryList = queryFolder.getQuery(context);
     //        Cast the IQBClassificationIndex into a ISearchIndex object
     searchIndex = (ISearchIndex) qbcIndex;
     queryEntry = searchIndex.getNewQueryEntry();
     queryEntry.setRowType(IQueryEntry.ROW_TYPE_ATTRIBUTE);
     queryEntry.setPropertyName(propertyName);
     queryEntry.setPropertyOperator(IQueryEntry.PROPERTY_OPERATOR_EQUAL);
     queryEntry.setValue(propertyValue);
     queryEntry.setTermAction(IQueryEntry.TERM_ACTION_EXACT);
     queryEntryList.add(queryEntry);
     //        Set the query for the query folder
     queryFolder.setQuery(queryEntryList, context);
     qbcIndex.updateCategoryContents("Document_Types", false, context);
Can somebody tell me what am I doing wrong please. Isn't it because of IQueryEntry.PROPERTY_OPERATOR_EQUAL? Is there any substring operator?
Thanks a lot.

Hi, Robert
In this moment, I have a problem with Query Based Taxonomy, maybe could you help me. I insert the query in to the taxonomy from code, but when i use the method
qbcIndex.updateCategoryContents("/taxonomies/borrame5/Prueba2", false, context);
I got the next exception:
#1.5#0014C210F3D1002A000001200000565B000431CC93AD5979#1180654627543#System.err#sap.com/irj#System.err#dummy01#10241#####SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_17##0#0#Error##Plain###     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:170)#
#1.5#0014C210F3D100310000012B0000565B000431CCC47166AB#1180655445698#System.err#sap.com/irj#System.err#dummy01#10241#####SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_18##0#0#Error##Plain###com.sapportals.wcm.service.indexmanagement.IndexNotReadyException: Some documents are not included in this update because indexing has not been finished yet.#
#1.5#0014C210F3D100310000012C0000565B000431CCC4717417#1180655445701#System.err#sap.com/irj#System.err#dummy01#10241#####SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_18##0#0#Error##Plain###     at com.sapportals.wcm.service.indexmanagement.retrieval.trex.AbstractTrexIndex.updateCategoryContents(AbstractTrexIndex.java:2493)#
I have doubt what parameters i need to pass to the method updateCategoryContents,
Let me give some information:
taxonomy:
   /taxonomies/borrame5/Prueba2
repository:
   /documents/Portal_KOF/KM/Pruebas1/Pruebas Versionamiento
classification and search index:
   borrame5
   I can't classify automatically, when i insert the query from code. When I manually insert the query from the portal, automatic classification run perfectly.
Thanks
Greetings
JARO.

Documents in Query-based Taxonomy are not Autoindexing

Hello experts!
I am on EP6.14 with Trex 6. I have a repository with a query-based taxonomy on it and is also part of a regular search index. I have autoclassification on.
On each document I have a couple of properties that are used to match documents in queries in my taxonomy. On the initial set-up and load, everything worked great. Documents went right where they were supposed to. But sometime after we released this to the business, the documents no longer automatically index. If I change a document property or set up a new one, it finds the category but leaves them as "suggested." You then have to go in and accept those suggestions to get the document to the right taxonomy. In short, it acts as if autoclassification is off. I have noticed that the Classification index does not submit a new document if I change a property but the search index does. Not sure if that is applicable but I would think both should do that since it is a change.
I did some research and found that synchronization issues or new folders could cause this problem but I have synchronized with no success. Also, state management is not on for the repository.
Is there any reason why autoclassification would stop on its own? What can I do to get it back on?
Thanks-
J
Many points given for helpful answers!

Hi Frederick-
Thanks for your response-
We have a single CM DB repository. There is a search only index at the root folder and classification index on a folder below the root. Normally, we don't overlap but we wanted only the folders in the lower folder to be part of the taxonomy. I suppose we could just rule out the other documents by not having them match any queries but this way it was guaranteed.
THe search and classifications are working (aren't throwing errors) but like I said, I would think that both would have to push the document through the queue. But I'm only seeing the search index do that. Now if I go and accept the recommended categories, then it goes into the queue for the Classification index.
J

Query Based Taxonomy and Searching Problem!

Hi all,
Ive an urgent problem to solve ....
I create some customs properties with dependent values, for example, if I put Country: Germany, I ve three options, (Waldorf,Munchen,Berlin) and so on ...
Then, I create a Query Based Taxonomy, where in some categories Ive a query, with the dependent value (Ex: Waldorf) ... I mean, If City = Waldorf, the document belongs to this category.
So, when I do this, the taxonomy fails ... Only with the dependent value, I mean, if the category is with the base property (Ex, Country) it works.
Plese, help!
Cheers,
Andres.

Hi,
To include a dependant property in a query, you have to enter both parent (Country = Germany) and the dependant (City = Munich) properties in the category.
Hope this help
Kind regards
Vincent

Query based taxonomy from scratch gives NoSuchMethodError...

I'm trying to create a query based taxonomy following the instuctions specified in the help docs: KM Platform -> Admin Guide -> Content Mgmt -> Taxonomies and Classification -> Creating a QBT -> from scratch. I created an index on a newly created (hence empty) folder in the 'documents' repository. So, essentially, the data source points to that folder. Also, I selected 'TREX Classification' on the 'Service' drop-down while creating the index. I left the crwler profile as blank. Then I went on to create a new 'Query Based Taxonomy'. I was able to create it alright, but as soon as I click on it to add folder and the such, I get this error:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.taxonomy.TaxonomyNamespaceManager.getDocumentTaxRMRids(TaxonomyNamespaceManager.java:1876)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.taxonomy.TaxonomyNamespaceManager.getTaxonomyClassResources(TaxonomyNamespaceManager.java:1831)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.taxonomy.TaxonomyNamespaceManager.addChildDocuments(TaxonomyNamespaceManager.java:1942)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.taxonomy.TaxonomyNamespaceManager.getChildren(TaxonomyNamespaceManager.java:368)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.CollectionImpl.internalGetChildren(CollectionImpl.java:966)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.CollectionImpl.getChildren(CollectionImpl.java:179)
Any help in solving this is highly apprecaited.
We run EP6 SP2.
I did NOT create a 'crawler profile' for this set up.
thanks,
Biju.

Hi Biju,
re. your NW'04 SP stack 4 migration intention:
NW'04 is still in ramp-up (SP stack 4 is the current shipment bundle of it) so at the current point in time, only participating ramp-up customers can use it.
A migration from EP6.0 SP2 to NW'04 will be possible (but not during the ramp-up phase).
From a Knowledge Management & Collaboration perspective, we will port most of the NW'04 SP stack 4 functions to EP6.0 SP2 as well. These functions will be shipped as EP6.0 SP2 Patch 5 (planned shipment date beginning of Q4 / 2004) so for mid-term, you can also plan to stay on EP6.0 SP2 if you have no other pressing reasons for going to NW'04 (e.g. enhanced Web AS functions).
This feature porting from NW -> EP6.0 SP2 is an 'only-once' action, however, and NetWeaver will be the release for new features in the future.
Regards,
Joerg

JClient query by example doesn't work in 10.1.2.

I've a JClient application I migrated from 9.0.4 to 10.1.2.
In the migrated app query by example doesn't work anymore in JTables.
Could someone help ?
Tks
Tullio

Frank, I got a testcase from Tullio. It's a 9.0.4 project uding JClient that is pre-ADF bindings.
I migrated his 9.0.4 project to 9.0.5.2 first.
In 9.0.5.2, I see already a change in behavior related to enter-query mode in the JTable, but the number of rows displayed looks correct.
Tullio, can you confirm if the problem you are seeing vis a vis enter query mode is that if you:
1. Click enter-query button
2. Click into a field like Ename and type SMITH but don't [Tab] out of that field yet
3. Click on the execute-query button
It behaves as if you've entered no criteria there.
If at step 2 above you clicked [Tab] to exit the field where you typed SMITH, then it works correctly.
Is this the enter-query-JTable-related problem you're seeing (that is, related to when you don't focus-out of the field?)
The "number-of-rows-displayed" issue you mention in this other thread (10.1.2 JClient binding Error. does reproduce with your testcase only in 10.1.2 (as well as also still having this 9.0.5.2 focus-related issue in enter query mode).

Identity Based Firewall doesn't work using Citrix Published Desktop environment

Hi!
We are using the newest release of AD Agent (1.0.0.32.1, built 598). The ASA Firewalls 5520 are having the software release 8.4(3)8 installed.
The problem:
When somebody tries to connect thru the Identity based firewalls from a citrix published desktop environment (PDI) the connection is not possible. Checking the ip-of-user mapping on the firewalls (show user-identity ip-of-user USERNAME) mostly doesn't show the mapping of the USERNAME and the PDI the user is logged in. The user-of-ip mapping of the PDIs IP-address shows mostly other users, which then are used to authenticate the acces thru the firewalls.
What is interesting, that on the AD Agent using "adacfg.exe cache list | find /i "USERNAME"" i can't see the PDIs IP-address neither because it is mapped to another user.
Questions:
Is Citrix Published Desktop environment supported to connect thru Identity based Firewalls?
Anybody knows how AD Agent, Domain Controllers and Firewalls are working together?
On the firewalls with "show user-identity ad-agent we see, the following:
Authentication Port: udp/1645
Accounting Port: udp/1646
ASA Listening Port: udp/3799
Why Cisco does use 1645 and 1646 and not 1812 and 1813?
The Listening Port is used for what purpose?
Remark: we tried the AD Agent modes full- download and on-demand with the same effect.
Thanks for your replies
Walter
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

There are no Firewalls between the AD-Agent and the DCs. We checked the names using nslookup. Everything ok. I asked our AD responsibles to doublecheck the firewall settings and the logs on the DCs and on the AD Agent. As soon i get an answer I will let you know.
What I saw on the firewalls is, that just one (the first) DC is communicating with the firewalls. Is this normal?
fw-1# show aaa-server protocol ldap
Server Group: AD-ALL
Server Protocol: ldap
Server Address: 192.168.229.30
Server port: 0
Server status: ACTIVE, Last transaction at unknown
Number of pending requests 0
Average round trip time 0ms
Number of authentication requests 114
Number of authorization requests 0
Number of accounting requests 0
Number of retransmissions 0
Number of accepts 114
Number of rejects 0
Number of challenges 0
Number of malformed responses 0
Number of bad authenticators 0
Number of timeouts 0
Number of unrecognized responses 0
Server Group: AD-ALL
Server Protocol: ldap
Server Address: 192.168.229.31
Server port: 0
Server status: ACTIVE, Last transaction at unknown
Number of pending requests 0
Average round trip time 0ms
Number of authentication requests 0
Number of authorization requests 0
Number of accounting requests 0
Number of retransmissions 0
Number of accepts 0
Number of rejects 0
Number of challenges 0
Number of malformed responses 0
Number of bad authenticators 0
Number of timeouts 0
Number of unrecognized responses 0
Server Group: AD-ALL
Server Protocol: ldap
Server Address: 192.168.229.39
Server port: 0
Server status: ACTIVE, Last transaction at unknown
Number of pending requests 0
Average round trip time 0ms
Number of authentication requests 0
Number of authorization requests 0
Number of accounting requests 0
Number of retransmissions 0
Number of accepts 0
Number of rejects 0
Number of challenges 0
Number of malformed responses 0
Number of bad authenticators 0
Number of timeouts 0
Number of unrecognized responses 0
Server Group: AD-ALL
Server Protocol: ldap
Server Address: 192.168.229.40
Server port: 0
Server status: ACTIVE, Last transaction at unknown
Number of pending requests 0
Average round trip time 0ms
Number of authentication requests 0
Number of authorization requests 0
Number of accounting requests 0
Number of retransmissions 0
Number of accepts 0
Number of rejects 0
Number of challenges 0
Number of malformed responses 0
Number of bad authenticators 0
Number of timeouts 0
Number of unrecognized responses 0
Server Group: AD-ALL
Server Protocol: ldap
Server Address: 192.168.229.41
Server port: 0
Server status: ACTIVE, Last transaction at unknown
Number of pending requests 0
Average round trip time 0ms
Number of authentication requests 0
Number of authorization requests 0
Number of accounting requests 0
Number of retransmissions 0
Number of accepts 0
Number of rejects 0
Number of challenges 0
Number of malformed responses 0
Number of bad authenticators 0
Number of timeouts 0
Number of unrecognized responses 0
Server Group: AD-ALL
Server Protocol: ldap
Server Address: 192.168.229.42
Server port: 0
Server status: ACTIVE, Last transaction at unknown
Number of pending requests 0
Average round trip time 0ms
Number of authentication requests 0
Number of authorization requests 0
Number of accounting requests 0
Number of retransmissions 0
Number of accepts 0
Number of rejects 0
Number of challenges 0
Number of malformed responses 0
Number of bad authenticators 0
Number of timeouts 0
Number of unrecognized responses 0
fw-1# sho user-identity ad-agent
Primary AD Agent:
Status up
Mode: on-demand
IP address: 192.168.11.8
Authentication port: udp/1645
Accounting port: udp/1646
ASA listening port: udp/3799
Interface: Intranet
Up time: 1 day 0 hours
Average RTT: 0 msec
AD Domain Status:
Domain DOMAIN: up
fw-1#
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Simple query but it doesn't work

hi, i have 2 schema, that is user1 and user2
i run this query on user1 but it doesn't give any result, but if i run on user2 it does return results. any idea why this happen?
     SELECT
          STORE_ID,
          NVL(STORE_NAME,'-'),
l.INSUPD_TIME
FROM user2.store s, user2.LOG l
     WHERE (s.rowid = l.row_id)
     AND insupd_time > (SELECT MAX(loading_time)
FROM user2.LOG
WHERE table_name = UPPER('Store'));

hi,
in the query u did not specify any table that is present in the schema user 1
try this
SELECT s.STORE_ID, NVL(s.STORE_NAME,'-'),i.INSUPD_TIME
FROM user2.store s, user2.LOG i
WHERE (s.rowid = i.row_id)
AND s.insupd_time > (SELECT MAX(loading_time)
FROM user2.LOG
WHERE table_name = UPPER('Store')
Trinath Somanchi,
Hyderabad.

Creating folder Structure for Query based taxonomy

Hello friends,
I am confused as to where do I create a folder hierarchy for taxonomy. Do I need to create a new repository for creating a folder structure. The help.sap.com mentions about using the Category Browser iview for creating the same. I am unable to find this iview in EP6 SP12. Can someone, please guide me as to where do I create a taxonomy folder structure hierarchy?
Your help is appreciated.
Thanks,
G.G

Hey G.G.,
Yes, i'd love to.
So, as stated above, directly below the "Taxonomies" folder you'll see the names of the existing taxonomies. There is no "new" option on this level, because a new taxonomy can only be created under "System Administration" -> "System Configuration" -> "Knowledge Management" -> "Index Administration". After you create a "TREX Search and Classification" or "TREX Classification" index, you can go to the index menu "Taxonomies" and say "New". This will automatically create a new folder under in the "Taxonomies" view.
Now, if you go one level further, so second subfolder under "Taxonomies" you should have the "New" option. If not, then you'll have to check the permission settings. Please go to "Content Administration" -> "KM Content" -> "Taxonomies" and then on the Menu "Details" -> "Settings" -> "Permissions". You might need to adjust permissions as suggested by SAP in SAPNote (599425):
Role:"ContentManager"=FULL CONTROL;
Group:"Everyone"=READ.
Please check that the already existing subfolders have inherited the permission changes.
Hope this solves your problem,
Robert

Tasks Reminders can be location based but doesn't work

Good day,
All I can do is tell the application to advise me at a specific date. The option at a location is not showing.
Is this an option available in Canada with Bell....

Got the answer, it only work with Iphone 4 and 4S NOT with 3GS

Date object doesn't work in query filters

I'm trying to create a universe object called Next Biweekly Pay End Date. Some background: there is an end date for our biweekly payrolls every 14 days, and the logic behind the object is basically that if there was a biweekly pay end date 7 days ago, the next one is 7 days from today (that is, sysdate + 7), etc.
I have it working so that it displays the correct date when used in a WebI report. However, when I use it in a query filter in a WebI report (like, Pay End Date = Next Biweekly Pay End Date), I don't get an error, but I also don't get any data. Somehow my object doesn't work in a query filter. The purpose of the object is for use in query filters, so I need to get this to work.
My best guess about why it doesn't work in a query filter is due to some issue with the data type. Pay End Date has a data type of date in the universe. I gave Next Biweekly Pay End Date a data type of date also, but the query filter still doesn't work; I get "no data to fetch."
We're using XI 3.1.6 and Oracle 10. Any ideas about how to get this to work?
If it helps, here is the definition of Next Biweekly Pay End Date. The logic is that it takes today's date, subtracts Oct. 31, 2009 (a biweekly pay end date), divides by 14, and looks at the remainder. If the remainder is 0, then today is a pay end date and the next one is 14 days from now. If the remainder is 1, yesterday was a pay end date and the next one is 13 days from now, etc.
case
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 0 then (sysdate + 14)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 1 then (sysdate + 13)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 2 then (sysdate + 12)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 3 then (sysdate + 11)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 4 then (sysdate + 10)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 5 then (sysdate + 9)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 6 then (sysdate + 8)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 7 then (sysdate + 7)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 8 then (sysdate + 6)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 9 then (sysdate + 5)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 10 then (sysdate + 4)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 11 then (sysdate + 3)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 12 then (sysdate + 2)
when mod((trunc(sysdate)) - (to_date('31/10/2009')),14) = 13 then (sysdate + 1)
end

Thanks for the suggestions.
I did some more testing, and there seems to be something more complicated going on. I ran the following code in SQL*Plus:
SELECT distinct M_PYDW1.PYSTATUS.DW_OWNER,
case
when to_date(sysdate, 'dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') >= to_date('01/01/2010','dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') then To_Date((sysdate - 2),'dd/mm/yyyy')
else to_date(sysdate +2, 'dd/mm/yyyy')
end
FROM M_PYDW1.PYSTATUS
The condition should be true, because the sysdate (today is Jan. 20) is greater than 1/1/2010, so I should get a result of sysdate - 2 (Jan. 18). But the result I get is Jan. 22 (sysdate +2). It seems that the comparison is failing even though I'm formatting both sysdate and 1/1/2010 as dates with a timestamp. What could cause that?
One more mystery: when I run the same code as above in a WebI report (using custom SQL), I get the error ORA-1830, date format picture ends before converting entire input string.

Changing folder in taxonomy is not working

Hi,
I have created several query based taxonomies and the working. In Taxonomy Query Builder my query look as follows:
If folder is A
This woks perfectly. I find the documents from under repositories->taxonomies->
If I change the folder and write:
If folder is B
This does not work. No documents is displayed under repositories->taxonomies->
There are documents in the folder B.
If I then change back to folder A it works again.

Hi .....
i did not understand you question.....
can u plz elaborate it for me....
are you changing the query for a catogory???
or
are you changing the catogory name!!!!!???
>>There are documents in the folder B.
what do mean by this statement?
regards,
Sudheer

Character string buffer too small (select list query based LOV)

Hi,
Using the select list query based LOV with a select witch is too big, you get this error.
report error:
ORA-20001: Error fetching column value: ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small
When using the Popup LOV query based LOV) then it works nice.
Can that be solved somehow?
With the Popup LOV the return value is displayed in stead of the description.

Hi Andy,
How do I incorporate your suggestion on a report ?
Example : I have
select apex_item.display_and_save(1,column1,5) col1,
apex_item.display_and_save(2,column2,5) col2 ,
apex_item.popup_from_query(3, emp_name, 'select user_name, name empname from table2) col3
Table 2 is a long list , and I'm getting string buffer too small due to this.
Your suggestion with HTP is good but I'm not sure how to implement it for reports as I'll like the user to change the values with the select_list.
I'm not using forms as they want mulit-record on the same page.
Hope to hear back from you soon.
Thanks very much.

Cannot train an example based taxonomy in trex

Hi friends,
I have created an index in index administration.And attached a data source also.Then i create a new example based taxonomy and also i create folders for categories.Then in content management i go to taxonomy trainner.There is no choice of upload of document through which i can train the taxonomy.Is there a way through which i can upload the documents in the categories i have created.Also the training documents should be in what format(doc,ppt).Also if somebody have a document for Example based and query based taxonomy creation please send the link.
I am having EP6 sp15 and trex 6.1.
Thanks

Hi
In example or query based taxonomy you have to upload the doccuments in the KM repository that is the data source whic is a folder in KM repository framework right click and then use upload the docs into it and in taxonomy you only create categories and manually train the taxonomy using query builder or trainer in Classification inbox .I will suggest you to go through the guides available in SERVICE market place service.sap.com and use HOW-To search term and then navigate to TREX to find the guides.Docs can be any format.
You can use an existing hierarchy in your CM to train your new taxonomy.
You can train a taxonomy automatically if you already have a folder hierarchy that you want to transport to a taxonomy.
Create the taxonomy in index management. This determines that you are going to train the taxonomy using an existing folder hierarchy. The system carries out the following steps:
It copies the specified folder and its entire subordinate folder hierarchy to a taxonomy structure. This creates a category for each folder.
The system then carries out the initial training of the taxonomy.
All documents in the folder hierarchy are also indexed. You can decide whether the folder that you are using to train the taxonomy is to be assigned to the index.
You train the taxonomies initially by classifying documents from your folder hierarchy.
This initial training is necessary so that the system can carry out automatic classification, or can make suggestions when manual classification takes place.
For the initial training, you classify documents from the folders in your knowledge management system. You do this is the iView in which you navigate within the folder hierarchy.
The necessary number of documents depends on the quality of the documents
hope this helpe you please do not forget to give points
with regards
subrato kundu

Query-based taxonomy doesn't work

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for