Query Builder won't apply chosen date to the where clause

Does anybody know why when I chose a date field, in the where clause, when using Query Builder, it won't actually write the chosen date to the actual query?
If I select the "View Query" tab, no date shows up. Also if I press the "Run Report" button in the "View Result" tab, I get this error:
"An error was encountered performing requested operation: ORA-00936: missing expression"
This is because actual date data is missing.
After I hit the "Apply" button, I have to manually type the date data.
I thought this was a bug of the previous version, but I just installed version 1.5.4 and I have no different result.
Thanks.

I just wanted to add my name to the list of people having this issue.
Oracle Techies, please help.

Similar Messages

Performance with dates in the where clause

Performance with dates in the where clause
CREATE TABLE TEST_DATA
FNUMBER NUMBER,
FSTRING VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),
FDATE DATE
create index t_indx on test_data(fdata);
query 1: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where trunc(fdate) = trunc(sysdate);
query 2: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between trunc(sysdate) and trunc(SYSDATE) + .99999;
query 3: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between to_date('21-APR-10', 'dd-MON-yy') and to_date('21-APR-10 23:59:59', 'DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss');
My questions:
1) Why isn't the index t_indx used in Execution plan 1?
2) From the execution plan, I see that query 2 & 3 is better than query 1. I do not see any difference between execution plan 2 & 3. Which one is better?
3) I read somewhere - "Always check the Access Predicates and Filter Predicates of Explain Plan carefully to determine which columns are contributing to a Range Scan and which columns are merely filtering the returned rows. Be sceptical if the same clause is shown in both."
Is that true for Execution plan 2 & 3?
3) Could some one explain what the filter & access predicate mean here?
Thanks in advance.
Execution Plan 1:
SQL> select count(*) from TEST_DATA where trunc(fdate) = trunc(sysdate);
COUNT(*)
283
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1486387033
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 517 (20)| 00:00:07 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 9 | | |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_DATA | 341 | 3069 | 517 (20)| 00:00:07 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter(TRUNC(INTERNAL_FUNCTION("FDATE"))=TRUNC(SYSDATE@!))
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
4 recursive calls
0 db block gets
1610 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
412 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
380 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
Execution Plan 2:
SQL> select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between trunc(sysdate) and trunc(SYSDATE) + .99999;
COUNT(*)
283
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1687886199
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 9 | | |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN| T_INDX | 283 | 2547 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter(TRUNC(SYSDATE@!)<=TRUNC(SYSDATE@!)+.9999884259259259259259
259259259259259259)
3 - access("FDATE">=TRUNC(SYSDATE@!) AND
"FDATE"<=TRUNC(SYSDATE@!)+.999988425925925925925925925925925925925
9)
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
7 recursive calls
0 db block gets
76 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
412 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
380 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows
Execution Plan 3:
SQL> select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between to_date('21-APR-10', 'dd-MON-yy') and to_dat
e('21-APR-10 23:59:59', 'DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss');
COUNT(*)
283
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1687886199
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 9 | | |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN| T_INDX | 283 | 2547 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter(TO_DATE('21-APR-10','dd-MON-yy')<=TO_DATE('21-APR-10
23:59:59','DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss'))
3 - access("FDATE">=TO_DATE('21-APR-10','dd-MON-yy') AND
"FDATE"<=TO_DATE('21-APR-10 23:59:59','DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss'))
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
7 recursive calls
0 db block gets
76 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
412 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
380 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed

Hi,
user10541890 wrote:
Performance with dates in the where clause
CREATE TABLE TEST_DATA
FNUMBER NUMBER,
FSTRING VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),
FDATE DATE
create index t_indx on test_data(fdata);Did you mean fdate (ending in e)?
Be careful; post the code you're actually running.
query 1: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where trunc(fdate) = trunc(sysdate);
query 2: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between trunc(sysdate) and trunc(SYSDATE) + .99999;
query 3: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between to_date('21-APR-10', 'dd-MON-yy') and to_date('21-APR-10 23:59:59', 'DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss');
My questions:
1) Why isn't the index t_indx used in Execution plan 1?To use an index, the indexed column must stand alone as one of the operands. If you had a function-based index on TRUNC (fdate), then it might be used in Query 1, because the left operand of = is TRUNC (fdate).
2) From the execution plan, I see that query 2 & 3 is better than query 1. I do not see any difference between execution plan 2 & 3. Which one is better?That depends on what you mean by "better".
If "better" means faster, you've already shown that one is about as good as the other.
Queries 2 and 3 are doing different things. Assuming the table stays the same, Query 2 may give different results every day, but the results of Query 3 will never change.
For clarity, I prefer:
WHERE fdate >= TRUNC (SYSDATE)
AND fdate < TRUNC (SYSDATE) + 1(or replace SYSDATE with a TO_DATE expression, depending on the requirements).
3) I read somewhere - "Always check the Access Predicates and Filter Predicates of Explain Plan carefully to determine which columns are contributing to a Range Scan and which columns are merely filtering the returned rows. Be sceptical if the same clause is shown in both."
Is that true for Execution plan 2 & 3?
3) Could some one explain what the filter & access predicate mean here?Sorry, I can't.

How to use DATE in the where clause

I need to select list of records from a table where available date is greater than or equal to current date. Below is the table structure and
select query used to get the list of records
CREATE TABLE TEMP (ITEM_ID NUMBER(20),ITEM_NAME VARCHAR2(100),CREATION_DATE DATE,AVAILABLE_DATE DATE);
INSERT INTO TEMP (ITEM_ID,ITEM_NAME,CREATION_DATE,AVAILABLE_DATE) VALUES(1,'ITEM1',SYSDATE,SYSDATE);
INSERT INTO TEMP (ITEM_ID,ITEM_NAME,CREATION_DATE,AVAILABLE_DATE) VALUES(2,'ITEM2',SYSDATE,SYSDATE+10);
INSERT INTO TEMP (ITEM_ID,ITEM_NAME,CREATION_DATE,AVAILABLE_DATE) VALUES(3,'ITEM3',SYSDATE,SYSDATE-10);
INSERT INTO TEMP (ITEM_ID,ITEM_NAME,CREATION_DATE,AVAILABLE_DATE) VALUES(4,'ITEM4',SYSDATE,SYSDATE);
INSERT INTO TEMP (ITEM_ID,ITEM_NAME,CREATION_DATE,AVAILABLE_DATE) VALUES(5,'ITEM5',SYSDATE,SYSDATE+5);
SELECT ITEM_NAME, available_date FROM TEMP WHERE available_date > SYSDATE OR available_date LIKE SYSDATE;I am getting the expected records but i am not able to find a condition where i can use *>=* for date data type, a query like the below one is
not returning expected records
SELECT ITEM_NAME, available_date FROM TEMP WHERE available_date >= SYSDATE ;Edited by: Balaji on Mar 19, 2012 9:13 PM

Hi,
Balaji wrote:
I need to select list of records from a table where available date is greater than or equal to current date. Below is the table structure and
select query used to get the list of records
CREATE TABLE TEMP (ITEM_ID NUMBER(20),ITEM_NAME VARCHAR2(100),CREATION_DATE DATE,AVAILABLE_DATE DATE);
INSERT INTO TEMP (ITEM_ID,ITEM_NAME,CREATION_DATE,AVAILABLE_DATE) VALUES(1,'ITEM1',SYSDATE,SYSDATE);
INSERT INTO TEMP (ITEM_ID,ITEM_NAME,CREATION_DATE,AVAILABLE_DATE) VALUES(2,'ITEM2',SYSDATE,SYSDATE+10);
INSERT INTO TEMP (ITEM_ID,ITEM_NAME,CREATION_DATE,AVAILABLE_DATE) VALUES(3,'ITEM3',SYSDATE,SYSDATE-10);
INSERT INTO TEMP (ITEM_ID,ITEM_NAME,CREATION_DATE,AVAILABLE_DATE) VALUES(4,'ITEM4',SYSDATE,SYSDATE);
INSERT INTO TEMP (ITEM_ID,ITEM_NAME,CREATION_DATE,AVAILABLE_DATE) VALUES(5,'ITEM5',SYSDATE,SYSDATE+5);
SELECT ITEM_NAME, available_date FROM TEMP WHERE available_date > SYSDATE OR available_date LIKE SYSDATE;
Both operands to LIKE are supposed to be strings. Don't try to use a DATE, such as SYSDATE, with LIKE.
I am getting the expected records but i am not able to find a condition where i can use *>=* for date data type, a query like the below one is
not returning expected records
SELECT ITEM_NAME, available_date FROM TEMP WHERE available_date >= SYSDATE ;
It's returning the results I expect.
If you'd say what results you were expecting, someone could help you wite a query to get them.
Assuming 1 second elapses between the time 'ITEM4' is inserted and the time the 2nd query is run, then, at run-time, available_date will be 1 second less than SYSDATE, so it should not be included.
If you want to find rows that are on the same calendar day as SYSDATE, or later, then use
WHERE available_date >= TRUNC (SYSDATE)

Can I use SYSDATE in the WHERE clause to limit the date range of a query

Hi,
Basicaly the subject title(Can I use SYSDATE in the WHERE clause to limit the date range of a query) is my question.
Is this possible and if it is how can I use it. Do I need to join the table to DUAL?
Thanks in advance.
Stelios

As previous poster said, no data is null value, no value. If you want something, you have nvl function to replace null value by an other more significative value in your query. 
 
Nicolas.

The query does not reference any table when attempting to build the WHERE clause. (IES 00022)

Hi
I am getting below error.
The query does not reference any table when attempting to build the WHERE clause. (IES 00022)
This error is in Validating Measue object in IDT.
It is not throwing error for dimensions objects but only for measure objects.
My BO version is 4.1
Backend is Teradata 14.1.
Regards
Gaurav.

Hi
In the dimension/Measure definition, you can select the table. Find the below screenshot.
If you still getting the issue…Can you please share your screenshot, for better understanding the issue?

Date Range in Where clause

I have ssas DB with two cubes, they share the date dimension. My query shows users on the dimension and visit as a measure. In the where clause I have range of dates. I have this strange behavior that after a FULL cube process I don't see
any data when applying the range. I'm sure that I have data for the range because when I filter each day desperately I can see data. Another weird scenario is that if the date is on the dimension I can see data. The thing that solve it is when process DATA
the cubes. This my query:
select non empty [Users].[User].[User] columns,
{[Measures].[Visits]} on rows
from [System Visit] where
([Dim_Date].[Georgian Calendar].[Date ID].&[20150125]:[Dim_Date].[Georgian Calendar].[Date ID].&[20150202])
Any thoughts what can be the issue? Thanks

Hi liranbn,
According to your description, you want to return the Visits within a date range. Right?
In this scenario, please modify your MDX query like below:
select nonempty([Users].[User].[User].members,[Measures].[Visits]) on columns,
[Measures].[Visits] on rows
from [System Visit]
where
({[Dim_Date].[Georgian Calendar].[Date ID].&[20150125]:[Dim_Date].[Georgian Calendar].[Date ID].&[20150202]})
Please see MDX with AdventureWorks sample:
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Simon Hou
TechNet Community Support

JSP, Data Web Bean, BC4J: Setting the where clause of a View Object at run time

Hi,
I am trying to develop a data web bean in which the where clause of a View Object will be set at run time and the results of the query then displayed.
My BC4J components are located in one project while the coding for the data web bean is in another project. I used the following code bu t it does not work. Could you please let me know what I am doing wrong?
public void populateOSTable(int P_EmpId)
String m_whereString = "EmpView.EMP_ID = " + P_EmpId;
String m_OrderBy = "EmpView.EMP_NAME";
oracle.jbo.ApplicationModule appModule = null;
ViewObject vo = appModule.findApplicationModule("EMPBC.EMPAppModule").findViewObject("EMPBC.EMPView");
vo.setWhereClause(m_whereString);
vo.setOrderByClause(m_OrderBy);
vo.executeQuery();
vo.next();
String empName numAttrs = vo.getAttribute(EmpName);
System.out.println(empName);
Thanks.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by JDev Team (Laura):
Here is how I have usually done mine:
1. In the JSP, use a RowsetNavigator bean to set the where clause and execute the query.
2. Use a custom web bean to process the results of the query (print to HTML).
for example:
<jsp:useBean class="oracle.jbo.html.databeans.RowsetNavigator" id="rsn" scope="request" >
<%
// get the parameter from the find form
String p = request.getParameter("p");
String s = request.getParameter("s");
// store the information for reference later
session.putValue("p", p);
session.putValue("s", s);
// initialize the app module and view object
rsn.initialize(application,session, request,response,out,"wt_bc_WT_bcModule.wtjoinView");
// set the where clause string
String theclause = "presname = '" + p + "' AND slideno=" + s;
// set the where clause for the VO
rsn.getRowSet().getViewObject().setWhereClause(theclause);
rsn.getRowSet().getViewObject().executeQuery();
rsn.getRowSet().first();
%>
</jsp:useBean>
<jsp:useBean class="wt_bc.walkthruBean" id="wtb" scope="request" >
<%
// initialize the app module and VO
wtb.initialize(application,session, request,response,out,"wt_bc_WT_bcModule.wtjoinView");
wtb.render();
%>
In this case, the render method of my custom web bean mostly gets some session variables, and prints various content depending on the session variable values.
Hope this helps.
</jsp:useBean><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Laura can you give the code of your walkthru bean? i wna't to initialize a viewobject, set the where clause and give that viewobject back to initialize my navigatorbar.
Nathalie
null

Date functions in WHERE clause? HELP

The following two queries are identical except for how I supply the date values in the where clause, yet the first query using the a custom my_date function runs 30x slower than the one using the TO_DATE() function. Both return DATE types...any reason for the difference?
SELECT * from outcomes
WHERE start_time >=fn_my_date('START_MONTH')
AND start_time < fn_my_date('END_MONTH')+1
-- This runs 30x faster--
SELECT * from outcomes
WHERE start_time >=TO_DATE('08/01/2001','MM/DD/YYYY')
AND start_time < TO_DATE('08/31/2001','MM/DD/YYYY')+1
On the flip side, I've also experienced queries running slower using the TO_DATE() function vs the LAST_DAY(sysdate) for equivalenet dates.
null

I haven't seen the message coming up when using LENGTH or SUBSTR, but every time I connect to a database or attempt to change my preferences (including the "NLS Parameters: Comp" preference), this appears.
You are attempting to set the preference you should be to switch this from ANSI to something else, but SQL Developer is ignoring the preference setting (which I think is a bug).
A way to set the NLS_COMP to something else is to use something like "alter session set nls_comp = BINARY;". Note that changing any preference after that appears to overwrite this and you need to do this for each new connection you start.

How do I modify the WHERE clause in my SQL query?

This seems like such a straight-forward part of the report design, but I'm fairly new to Crystal Reports and I only have experience with modifying reports someone else has already written. In this particular case, I just need to modify the WHERE clause of the SQL query. I can select Show SQL Query and see what statement is being used to select data, but I can't find where to modify it since it's grayed out. I see how to change the selection criteria, parameters, grouping, etc...just not the WHERE clause. The report is linked to a database used for reporting with a table created and populated by a stored procedure. I don't need to modify the stored procedure because the data I want to filter by is currently in the table--I just don't know how to filter by what I need. Here's part of the query:
SELECT "rpt_dist"."startdate", "rpt_dist"."transtype", "rpt_dist"."laborcode", "rpt_dist"."crewid", "rpt_dist"."regularhrs" FROM "Reporting"."dbo"."rpt_dist" "rpt_dist"
WHERE (rpt_dist."transtype" <> 'WORK' AND rpt_dist."transtype" <> 'WMATL') AND rpt_dist."laborcode" LIKE 'S%' AND (rpt_dist."crewid" = 'HOUS' OR rpt_dist."crewid" = 'HOUS2' ...
I would like to add another crewid to the WHERE clause. Thanks for any input.

1.Open the report in the crystal designer
2.Go to the field explorer(if hidden go to view menu->field explorer)
3.Rt. click on the database fields->choose database expert
4.Now you will see 2 columns-Available DataSource and Selected Tables
5.Rt. click on the object(ex.command) available in the Selected Tables column->Choose Edit command
6.A new Modify Command window will appear,here you can edit your SQL Query
I get to step 4 and I see the two columns including my database and the report table, but there is no command object available. If I right-click on my table, I can just view the Properties. ??
As for the other tip to modify the record selection: I don't see anywhere the other crewid values are set and if I add the one I'm missing, it doesn't modify the existing SQL Query and when I preview the report it throws off the results so that no data displays??
I'm using Crystal Reports 11.5 if that makes a difference. Thanks again.

Query Tuning - using CASE statement in the WHERE clause

Hi All,
My query has been modified to use a CASE statement in the WHERE clause to consider data from certain columns based on a parameter value. This modified query is doing a full table scan and running endlessly. Please suggest what may be done to improve its performance:
Query:
SELECT LAST_DAY(TRUNC(TO_TIMESTAMP(os.requestdatetime, 'yyyymmddhh24:mi:ss.ff4'))) AS summary_date,
os.acctnum,
os.avieworigin_refid,
COUNT(1) cnt_articleview,
SUM(NVL(autocompletedterm,0)) cnt_autocompletedterm
FROM TABLE1 os
WHERE os.acctnum IS NOT NULL
AND os.avieworigin_refid IS NOT NULL
AND os.requestdatetime IS NOT NULL
AND UPPER(os.success_ind) = 'S'
AND CASE WHEN
Param_ValueToCheck = 'FULL' AND get_date_timestamp(os.requestdatetime) BETWEEN
TO_DATE('01-MAY-2011 00:00:00','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') AND
TO_DATE('31-MAY-2011 00:00:00','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
THEN 1
WHEN
Param_ValueToCheck = 'INCR' AND os.entry_createddate BETWEEN
TO_DATE('01-MAY-2011 00:00:00','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') AND
TO_DATE('31-MAY-2011 00:00:00','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
THEN 1
END = 1
AND CASE WHEN
Param_ValueToCheck = 'FULL' AND os.entry_CreatedDate BETWEEN
TO_DATE('01-APR-2011 00:00:00','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') AND
TO_DATE('07-JUN-2011 00:00:00','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
THEN 1
WHEN
Param_ValueToCheck = 'INCR' THEN 1
END = 1
GROUP BY LAST_DAY(TRUNC(TO_TIMESTAMP(os.requestdatetime, 'yyyymmddhh24:mi:ss.ff4'))), os.acctnum,os.avieworigin_refid;Table Description:
(Number of rows : approx > 600,000,000)
Name Null Type
ARTICLEID NOT NULL NUMBER(20)
USERKEY NUMBER(10)
AVIEWORIGIN_REFID VARCHAR2(10)
SUCCESS_IND VARCHAR2(2)
ENTRY_CREATEDDATE DATE
CREATED_BY VARCHAR2(10)
FILENUMBER NUMBER(10)
LINENUMBER NUMBER(10)
ACCTNUM VARCHAR2(10)
AUTOCOMPLETEDTERM NUMBER(2)
REQUESTDATETIME VARCHAR2(19)Explain Plan
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2224314832
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 590 | 33040 | 2501K (1)| 08:20:15 | | |
| 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 590 | 33040 | 2501K (1)| 08:20:15 | | |
| 2 | PARTITION RANGE ALL| | 590 | 33040 | 2501K (1)| 08:20:15 | 1 |1048575|
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TABLE1 | 590 | 33040 | 2501K (1)| 08:20:15 | 1 |1048575|
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
 3 - filter(UPPER("OS"."SUCCESS_IND")='S' AND CASE WHEN ('FULL'='FULL' AND
 "OS"."ENTRY_CREATEDDATE">=TO_DATE(' 2011-04-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
 "OS"."ENTRY_CREATEDDATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2011-06-07 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) THEN 1 WHEN
 'FULL'='INCR' THEN 1 END =1 AND "OS"."REQUESTDATETIME" IS NOT NULL AND CASE WHEN ('FULL'='FULL'
 AND "ODS"."GET_DATE_TIMESTAMP"("REQUESTDATETIME")>=TO_DATE(' 2011-05-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd
 hh24:mi:ss') AND "ODS"."GET_DATE_TIMESTAMP"("REQUESTDATETIME")<=TO_DATE(' 2011-05-31 00:00:00',
 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) THEN 1 WHEN ('FULL'='INCR' AND "OS"."ENTRY_CREATEDDATE">=TO_DATE('
 2011-05-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "OS"."ENTRY_CREATEDDATE"<=TO_DATE('
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
 2011-05-31 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) THEN 1 END =1 AND "OS"."ACCTNUM" IS NOT NULL AND
 "OS"."AVIEWORIGIN_REFID" IS NOT NULL)Edited by: Chaitanya on Jun 9, 2011 2:44 AM
Edited by: Chaitanya on Jun 9, 2011 2:47 AM

Hi Dom,
Modified Query:
SELECT LAST_DAY(TRUNC(TO_TIMESTAMP(os.requestdatetime, 'yyyymmddhh24:mi:ss.ff4'))) AS summary_date,
os.acctnum,
os.avieworigin_refid,
COUNT(1) cnt_articleview,
SUM(NVL(autocompletedterm,0)) cnt_autocompletedterm
FROM TABLE1 os
WHERE os.acctnum IS NOT NULL
AND os.avieworigin_refid IS NOT NULL
AND os.requestdatetime IS NOT NULL
AND UPPER(os.success_ind) = 'S'
AND (('FULL' = 'FULL'
AND (get_date_timestamp(os.requestdatetime) BETWEEN TO_DATE('01-MAY-2011 00:00:00','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
 AND TO_DATE('31-MAY-2011 00:00:00','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
AND os.entry_CreatedDate BETWEEN TO_DATE('01-APR-2011 00:00:00','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
 AND TO_DATE('07-JUN-2011 00:00:00','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
OR ('FULL' = 'INCR'
AND os.entry_createddate BETWEEN TO_DATE('01-MAY-2011 00:00:00','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
 AND TO_DATE('31-MAY-2011 00:00:00','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') ))
GROUP BY LAST_DAY(TRUNC(TO_TIMESTAMP(os.requestdatetime, 'yyyymmddhh24:mi:ss.ff4'))), os.acctnum,os.avieworigin_refid;Execute Plan:
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3615447714
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 25125 | 1374K| | 407K (1)| 01:21:36 | | |
| 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 25125 | 1374K| 3768K| 407K (1)| 01:21:36 | | |
| 2 | PARTITION RANGE ITERATOR| | 25125 | 1374K| | 407K (1)| 01:21:32 | 29 | 31 |
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TABLE1 | 25125 | 1374K| | 407K (1)| 01:21:32 | 29 | 31 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
 3 - filter("OS"."ENTRY_CREATEDDATE">=TO_DATE(' 2011-04-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
 UPPER("OS"."SUCCESS_IND")='S' AND "OS"."REQUESTDATETIME" IS NOT NULL AND
 "ODS"."GET_DATE_TIMESTAMP"("REQUESTDATETIME")>=TO_DATE(' 2011-05-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
 "ODS"."GET_DATE_TIMESTAMP"("REQUESTDATETIME")<=TO_DATE(' 2011-05-31 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
 "OS"."ACCTNUM" IS NOT NULL AND "OS"."AVIEWORIGIN_REFID" IS NOT NULL AND "OS"."ENTRY_CREATEDDATE"<=TO_DATE('
 2011-06-07 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))Edited by: Chaitanya on Jun 9, 2011 4:51 AM

Query in the where clause is not allowed

Hi all,
I have a table m_vehicle that stores 1 or more than 1 rows of data for each person. But the partner's schema requires that 0 or 1 vehicle license plate data be sent with the xml file. I have the following nested select statement inside a bigger one and it does not work,
select xmlelement("VehicleLicensePlate",
     (case when mv.lic_plate_state is not null then
          xmlelement("PlateState", mv.lic_plate_state)
     end), -- end of plate state
     (case when mv.lic_plate_no is not null then
          xmlelement("PlateNumber", xmlelement("ID", mv.lic_plate_no))
     end),
     (case when mv.lic_plate_year is not null then
          xmlelement("PlateExpiryYear", mv.lic_plate_year)
     end)
     ).extract('/*')
from m_vehicle mv where mv.mni_id = 1083650
and mv.seq_no = (select max(mv2.seq_no) from m_vehicle mv2
where mv2.mni_id = mv.mni_id) and mv.lic_plate_no is not null
But it works when I run it alone and gets the latest row for the person. It does not work either if I join this table with other tables. My root element select is from dual because I have to supply lots of SOAP and other artifacts in the xml. Is it because I have this root select from dual that the query in the where clause does not work? How do I make it work so that I get 0 or one row only from the table? My solution was to write a function that returns each part of the license plate data using dymanic sql and call it in the xmlelement function. It works but I would like to use plain sql instead.
Thanks.
Ben

By the way, the error I get is this,
ERROR:
ORA-31011: XML parsing failed
ORA-19202: Error occurred in XML processing
LPX-00216: invalid character 3 (0x3)
Error at line 1
ORA-06512: at "SYS.XMLTYPE", line 111
Ben

Problem with date fields in where clause after changing driver

Hi,
We have changed the oracle driver we use to version 10
and now we have some trouble with date-fields.
When we run this SQL query from our Java program:
select *
from LA_TRANS
where LA_TRANS.FROM_DATE>='20040101' AND LA_TRANS.FROM_DATE<='20041231'
We get this error code:
ORA-01861: literal does not match format string
The query worked fine whit the previous driver.
Is there some way I can run a SQL query with date fields
as strings in the where clause?
Thanks!

Keeping the argument of standard SQL or not aside, comparing DATE columns to a constant string (which looks like a date in one of the thousands of the formats available, but not in others) is NOT one of the best programming practices and leads to heartburn and runtime errors (as you have seen yourself).
I would rather compare a DATE to a DATE.
Also, constants like that would be another issue to fix in your code:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:6899751034602146050::NO::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID,F4950_P8_CRITERIA:528893984337,

PreparedStatement.setDate(int, Date) problem in WHERE clause

Hello all,
First and foremost, thanks for the help. It is really appreciated.
I am having the toughest time tracking down a problem with how I am handling date setting with my PreparedStatement. The kicker is that I am only having problems with the where clause date sets.
The date is pulled out of the database, put into a string, modified, put back into a date, and then used to query via SQL.
Data selected this way:
"SELECT * FROM table_name"
Data updated this way:
"UPDATE table_name SET name = ? WHERE pk_id = ? AND pk_date = ?"
The java.sql.Date object I use to PreparedStatement.setDate(int, Date) is exact to seconds. It works great if it is not in the where clause (eg Inserts work, Updates work without where clause) which leads me to believe there is truncation of data somewhere between setDate(int, Date) and the native SQL in Oracle 9i.
Is that a correct assumption? How do I solve this?
Thanks,
John

My assumption was correct. If a java.sql.DATE is pulled from a Oracle 9i database it may have more data in it than is allowed for in java.sql.Date. java.sql.Timestamp, on the other hand, does retain all data in the field.
The correct code looks something like this
prepStmt.setTimestamp(Timestamp.valueOf(timeString));
cheers,
John

JSP, DataWebBean: How to dynamically set the where clause of query and display record

Hi,
I am reposting this question as per suggestions made by Mr. Dwight.
I have used ViewCurrentRecord web bean to display records from EMP table. I have to use the Dept_Id_FK from the current
record of the EMP table to display corresponding records of Dept table. I have a view object called DeptView in my Business
Components which selects all the records from the Dept table.
How do I get the value of Dept_Id_FK and use it to display the required records of the Dept table?
I tried to declare a variable and get the value of Dept_Id_FK but it did not work. My code is as follows:
<%! String m_DeptId = null; %>
<jsp:useBean id="RowViewer" class="oracle.jbo.html.databeans.ViewCurrentRecord" scope="request">
<%
RowViewer.initialize(pageContext, "EMPApp_EMP_EMPAppModule.EMPView1");
RowViewer.setReleaseApplicationResources(false);
RowViewer.getRowSet().next();
m_DeptId = (String)RowViewer.getRowSet().getCurrentRow().getAttribute("DeptIdFk");
%>
</jsp:useBean>
Thanks.
null

First of all, Thank you very much for making use of the new topic format. It is very much appreciated.
As for your question, I think there are several different ways to accomplish what I think you want to do.
1. Create a view object that includes both Emp and Dept entities and join them there. In this case, your query would look something like this:
Select e.empno,e.name,...,d.dname,d.loc from emp e, dept d
where e.deptno = d.deptno
You should be able to create a JSP off of this view object that contains both the employee and department information. In this case, BC4J takes care of the foreign key to primary key coordination.
2. In order to set a dynamic where clause for a view, you need to do the following in your usebean tag:
rsn.initialize(application,session, request,response,out,"DeptView");
rsn.getRowSet().getViewObject().setWhereClause("deptno=" | | m_DeptId);
rsn.getRowSet().getViewObject().executeQuery();
rsn.getRowSet().first();
You will need to do this in a separate usebean tag from the EmpView, since the usebean can only initialize one view object.
In other words, you would have your ViewCurrentRecord bean tag for the EmpView, then a separate one for the DeptView where you use the above code to set the where clause to display just the information for the department you want.
Another option, but one I'm not sure would work as well, is to create a master-detail JSP to do this for you. Usually a master-detail is a one-to-many (one department to many employees). Your request appears to be the reverse, but might still be doable using the same mechanism.
You set up relationships between views in your BC4J project using View Links. If you used the BC4J project wizard and created default views, some of these links may have been created for you. They are created when BC4J detects a foreign key to primary key relationship in the database.
You can create your own View Links using the View Link wizard. Select your BC4J project node and choose Create View Link... from the context menu. You will be asked to select a source view (Emp), and a target view (Dept), then select the attribute in each view that related the two of them (deptno).
Next, you need to reflect this new relationship setting in your application module. Select your app module and choose Edit from the context menu. On the data model page, select the EmpView node in the Selected list. Now select the DeptView node in the available list and shuttle it over. You should see DeptView1 via yourlink appear indented under the EmpView node. Save and rebuild your BC4J project to reflect the changes.
In your JSP project, you can now have the wizard create a master-detail form for you based on DeptView1.
Let me know if the above answers your question, or if I have misunderstood what it is you wanted to do.
null

Query Tuning - using CASE statement in the WHERE clause - Duplicate Post

Duplicate Post by mistake.
Please check
Query Tuning - using CASE statement in the WHERE clause
Edited by: Chaitanya on Jun 9, 2011 2:45 AM
Edited by: Chaitanya on Jun 9, 2011 2:46 AM

Duplicate Post by mistake.
Please check
Query Tuning - using CASE statement in the WHERE clause
Edited by: Chaitanya on Jun 9, 2011 2:45 AM
Edited by: Chaitanya on Jun 9, 2011 2:46 AM

Query Builder won't apply chosen date to the where clause

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for