Query can't include an "ORDER BY" clause when having column heading sorting

I'm getting the following error when I try to include "ORDER BY" in my sql statement :
"Your query can't include an "ORDER BY" clause when having column heading sorting enabled"
I have used other sql statements with "ORDER BY" but this is the first time I have come across this and I don't understand why it's going wrong. Does anyone have a suggestion as to how I could fix it? Here is one of the sql statements which I have tried which is giving me the error:
select "ID_NUMBER",
"PROJECT_NAME",
"PROJECT_TYPE",
"OWNER",
"PRIORITY",
"STATUS",
"END_DATE",
"COMMENTS"
from "PROJECT"
WHERE "STATUS" != 'Completed' AND "STATUS" != 'Cancelled'
ORDER BY "END_DATE"
Regards,
Ed.

You must deselect column heading sorting that is in the page "Report Attributes" .This is a check box placed on the same line of the element of the report.
bye

Similar Messages

Limitation that only 1000 records can be included in the "IN" clause

In RapidSQL we have a limitation that only 1000 records can be included in the "IN" clause - is there a way to give more than 1000 records so that it will reduce the execution time.

Why do you need to list more than 1000 individual items in the first place? That's generally not a good way to go about building a query.
You can always include a query that returns as many rows as you'd like in an IN clause, i.e.
SELECT *
FROM some_table
WHERE some_column IN (SELECT some_column FROM some_other_table)So if you throw the thousands of values you want in the IN list into a table, you could then query the table in your IN clause.
From a performance standpoint, of course, you may also want to look at the EXISTS clause depending on the relative data volumes involved.
Justin

Can i assign an 'order by' clause dynamically in forms ??

I know it's possible to assign an 'order by' clause in reports with lexical parameter.
for example..
select A
from TABLE
where A is not null
&V_ORDERBY
In this, v_orderby might be 'order by name' like that,,,
can i assign an 'order by' clause dynamically IN FORMS ??
If you understan my question, please answer to me,,,ㅜㅜ

Have you tried this build-in function?
SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('[BLOCK_NAME]', ORDER_BY, 'SORTCOL1, SORTCOL2...');
Where 'SORTCOL1, SORTCOL2...' are the table columns name.

Where to place ORDER BY clause when a query includes UNION

I have a query that has UNION in it. could you please tell me where to place the ORDER BY clause. Because it's throwing an error if i place the ORDER BY clause at the end

Because you are using the UNION set operator, you need to either specifically list your columns or use positional notation.
Without a set operator we can order by the column name without specifically listing it:
SQL> select * from dual
2 order by dummy;
D
X
1 row selected.This doesn't work once you introduce a set operator:
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 select * from dual union all
2 select * from dual union all
3 select * from dual
4* order by dummy
SQL> /
order by dummy
ERROR at line 4:
ORA-00904: "DUMMY": invalid identifierSo you need to either use positional notation:
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 select * from dual union all
2 select * from dual union all
3 select * from dual
4* order by 1
SQL> /
D
X
X
X
3 rows selected.Or, specifically list or alias the columns you are projecting:
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 select dummy from dual union all
2 select dummy from dual union all
3 select dummy from dual
4* order by dummy
SQL> /
D
X
X
X
3 rows selected.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 select dummy as d from dual union all
2 select dummy as d from dual union all
3 select dummy as d from dual
4* order by d
SQL> /
D
X
X
X
3 rows selected.cheers,
Anthony

Why I cannot use RowID in where clause but can use it in order by clause

I am on SQL Server 2008.
1. If I use
SELECT (ROW_NUMBER() over
(order by ImportId, ScenarioId, SiteID, AssetID, LocalSKUID, WEEKID, MonthID)) RowID, *
FROM [JnJ_Version1].[dbo].[td_Production_Week]
order by RowID
Statement works
But
2. If I use
SELECT (ROW_NUMBER() over
(order by ImportId, ScenarioId, SiteID, AssetID, LocalSKUID, WEEKID, MonthID)) RowID, *
FROM [JnJ_Version1].[dbo].[td_Production_Week]
  where RowID > 10000
I get error, RowID is an invalid column Name why? How to correct query 2.

This is due to the logical evaluation order of a SELECT statement. Logically, a SELECT statement is computed in the order:
FROM (which includes JOIN)
WHERE
GROUP BY
HAVING
SELECT
ORDER BY
OFFSET
Thus, you can use what is defined in the SELECT list in the ORDER BY clause, but not in the WHERE clause.
In the case of row_number(), this has immediate repurcussions. row_number() is computed from the rows as they arrive the SELECT clause, and if you then you would filter on the value in the WHERE clause you would be going round in circles.
To do what you are looking for, you use a nested table, for instance with a CTE:
WITH numbering AS (
   SELECT (ROW_NUMBER() over
(order by ImportId, ScenarioId, SiteID, AssetID, LocalSKUID, WEEKID, MonthID)) RowID, *
FROM [JnJ_Version1].[dbo].[td_Production_Week]
SELECT *
FROM   numbering
WHERE RowID > 10000
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

Problem with group by/order by clause when using huge data

Hi,
I'm using below query on my table of size more than 210 million rows.
SELECT booking_date FROM T_UTR
WHERE four_eyes_status = 'A' AND booking_date <= '01-jul-2005' AND booking_date >= '01-jan-2004'
AND invoice_id IS NULL AND link_id = 12345
AND billing_indicator = 'L'
GROUP BY booking_date ORDER BY booking_date
If I'm skipping last line "GROUP BY booking_date ORDER BY booking_date", its giving me immediate result, but, because of group by/order by, the query may take 30 seconds to 2 minutes based on the data fetched for the date range. It may vary from 2 to 2 million rows, & grouping by for so many rows at run time will automatically take some time.
Here I want to know, is there any procedure in oracle(any function based index) so that I can store/retrieve distinct values for link_id, & booking_date without grouping them at run time. Or the performance of the query can be increased
Thanks
Deepak

Hi,
You can use Materialized Views as stated earlier - specifically by using Query Rewrite. If the conditions on columns "four_eyes_status", "invoice_id", and "billing_indicator" never change in your query - then you can create a Materialized View that is targeted for those conditions and has lower cardinality (since you aren't grouping by those columns). The "COUNT(*)" allows the use of the DISTINCT operator in addition to "GROUP BY' as well for Query Rewrite.
Create the Materialized View like this:
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW test_mv1
BUILD IMMEDIATE
USING NO INDEX
REFRESH FORCE ON DEMAND
ENABLE QUERY REWRITE
AS
SELECT booking_date
     , link_id
     , COUNT(*) AS count_star
FROM T_UTR
WHERE four_eyes_status = 'A'
AND invoice_id IS NULL
AND billing_indicator = 'L'
GROUP BY booking_date
       , link_id ;To improve performance further - create an index on the "LINK_ID" column like this:
CREATE INDEX test_mv1_link_id_idx
ON test_mv1 (link_id);Then - gather stats immediately on the Materialized View so that the CBO can use it for rewriting your original query - like this:
BEGIN
   DBMS_STATS.gather_table_stats (ownname               => USER
                                , tabname               => 'TEST_MV1'
                                , partname              => NULL
                                , estimate_percent      => DBMS_STATS.auto_sample_size
                                , block_sample          => FALSE
                                , method_opt            => 'FOR ALL COLUMNS SIZE 1'
                                , degree                => NULL
                                , granularity           => 'ALL'
                                , cascade               => TRUE
                                , no_invalidate         => FALSE
END;
/Now - the CBO should be able to rewrite your original query to use the Materialized View - provided you set up your session for Query Rewrite like this:
ALTER SESSION SET query_rewrite_enabled = TRUE;
ALTER SESSION SET query_rewrite_integrity = ENFORCED; -- set this to whatever staleness you can tolerate - see the docs for details...Now - after setting up your session - try running your query with autotrace to see if it was rewritten...
Good luck!
Message was edited by:
PDaddy

Conditional order by clause with multiple columns

I would like to know whether it is possible to include multiple columns in a conditional order by clause.
Ex: I have written the following PL / SQL :
CREATE PROCEDURE GetProducts
@OrderBy VARCHAR(50),
@Input2 VARCHAR(30)
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON
SELECT Id, ProductName, Description, Price, Quantity
FROM Products
WHERE ProductName LIKE @Input2
ORDER BY
CASE
WHEN @OrderBy = 'ProductNameAsc' THEN ProductName
END ASC,
CASE
WHEN @OrderBy = 'ProductNameDesc' THEN ProductName
END DESC
END
Now I want to include when the Orderby - "Productnameasc" then order by productname, price, stdate
else
orderby productname, crdate, category
Could this be done? I tried it, but couldn't get this to work.
Any help is greatly appreciated.

Since matching ORDER BY columns have different data types (first column for CLERK is sal - number, first column for MANAGER deptno is number but first column for "else" is a string) we need to convert number to string but preserve number sort order. Since DEPTNO is NUMBER(2) we will use TO_CHAR with format 'S00'. Since SAL is NUMBER(7,2) we will use TO_CHAR with format model 'S00000D00'. For EMPNO we will use TO_CHAR with format model 'S0000'.
select deptno,
        empno,
        ename,
        job,
        sal
from emp
order by case job
             when 'CLERK' then to_char(sal,'S00000D00')
             when 'MANAGER' then to_char(deptno,'S00')
             else ename
           end,
           case job
             when 'CLERK' then to_char(deptno,'S00')
             else job
           end,
           case job
             when 'CLERK' then job
             when 'MANAGER' then to_char(empno,'S0000')
           end
    DEPTNO      EMPNO ENAME      JOB              SAL
        20       7369 SMITH      CLERK            800
        30       7900 JAMES      CLERK            950
        20       7876 ADAMS      CLERK           1100
        10       7934 MILLER     CLERK           1300
        10       7782 CLARK      MANAGER         2450
        20       7566 JONES      MANAGER         2975
        30       7698 BLAKE      MANAGER         2850
        30       7499 ALLEN      SALESMAN        1600
        20       7902 FORD       ANALYST         3000
        10       7839 KING       PRESIDENT       5000
        30       7654 MARTIN     SALESMAN        1250
    DEPTNO      EMPNO ENAME      JOB              SAL
        20       7788 SCOTT      ANALYST         3000
        30       7844 TURNER     SALESMAN        1500
        30       7521 WARD       SALESMAN        1250
14 rows selected.
SQL> SY.

How can i include css in html file when exported

I want the CSS should be included in the html file when exported, how is that posable?

Muse follows its own structure and keeps HTML, CSS and JS code in separate files as and when possible. If you want all that code to be merged into the HTML file itself, then there is no option to force Muse to do that. You can however, add your own CSS code into the HTML page by adding the CSS using either the Insert HTML option or using the HTML for <head> option in Page Properties > Metadata.
Cheers,
Vikas

Can clicking on column heading sort the column contents instead of drill in

I have a pivot table with data that the client doesn't want to drill into. Instead, they want to be able to click the column heading and have the pivot table re-sort the data in the table based on the data in that column. Is that possible, or are clickable column headings only used for drilling in OBIEE? Thanks.

Madan -
That seems like a feature that should be added to the Pivot Table view if they are going to have it in the Table View. Still, thanks for pointing out the "Enable column sorting in Dashboards" check box in the Table view. I'll see if I can either get this data into the Table view, or at least let the client know the limitations of OBIEE.
Thanks again.
Daniel

How to write a query with group by and order by for a date column

I have a query:
select count(*), to_char(s.pdate,'Mon-yyyy') as month from sTable s
group by to_char(s.pdate,'Mon-yyyy')
order by to_date(s.pdate,'Mon-yyyy')
However, I got an error: not a GROUP By expression.
If i just run: select count(*), to_char(s.pdate,'Mon-yyyy') as month from sTable s
group by to_char(s.pdate,'Mon-yyyy')
it is work fine.
How to solve the problem.
Thanks,
Jen

Jen,
You can use this code
with sTable as (select to_date('01/01/2009', 'dd/mm/yyyy') pdate, 1 code from dual union all
              select to_date('02/02/2009', 'dd/mm/yyyy') a, 2 code from dual union all
              select to_date('01/03/2009', 'dd/mm/yyyy') d, 3 code from dual union all
              select to_date('05/04/2009', 'dd/mm/yyyy') g, 4 code from dual union all
              select to_date('05/05/2009', 'dd/mm/yyyy') g, 4 code from dual union all
              select to_date('05/06/2009', 'dd/mm/yyyy') g, 4 code from dual union all
              select to_date('05/07/2009', 'dd/mm/yyyy') g, 4 code from dual union all
              select to_date('05/08/2009', 'dd/mm/yyyy') g, 4 code from dual union all
              select to_date('05/09/2009', 'dd/mm/yyyy') g, 4 code from dual union all
              select to_date('05/10/2009', 'dd/mm/yyyy') g, 4 code from dual union all
              select to_date('05/11/2009', 'dd/mm/yyyy') g, 4 code from dual union all
              select to_date('05/12/2009', 'dd/mm/yyyy') h, 5 code from dual)
select cnt, to_char(to_date(mnt||'01', 'yyyymmdd'), 'Mon-yyyy')
from (select count(*) cnt, to_char(s.pdate,'yyyymm') as mnt
          from sTable s
         group by to_char(s.pdate,'yyyymm')
         order by to_char(s.pdate,'yyyymm')
       CNT MONTH
         1 Jan-2009
         1 Feb-2009
         1 Mar-2009
         1 Apr-2009
         1 May-2009
         1 Jun-2009
         1 Jul-2009
         1 Aug-2009
         1 Sep-2009
         1 Oct-2009
         1 Nov-2009
         1 Dec-2009
12 rows selectedyour problem was that you are using a expresión in the order by (to_date...) that is distinct to the query results (to_char...).
Regards,
Mike

Order by clause in Sub query

Hi,
Can we use order by clause in Sub query?
While using the order by clause, I am getting the "missing expression error" . If I remove order by clause query executing fine.
Here is my query:
select *
from emp_mstr
where emp_no in(select
emp_no
from emp_mstr
order by branch_no);
Thanks & Regards,
Mahi

May be you miss some required spaces also, other than wrong use of ORDER BY
select *
from emp_mstr
where emp_no in
     ( select e2.emp_no
       from emp_mstr e2
--       order by e2.branch_no
     );Why do you want to ORDER BY in the subquery, which you use with IN clause? That will not make any difference in the result..Means the result you get with ORDER BY will be same as without that.. And in this case, ORDER by is a unncessary overhead.. And Ordering is very costly..
And why do you want to have the IN clause at all in your query? You are referring the same tables in the main query and sub query..
The below will give the same result
select *
from emp_mstr
where emp_no is not nullIf you want to use another table in the subquery, always use aliasess...
select *
from emp_mstr
where emp_no in
     ( select e2.emp_no
       from emp_mstr2 e2
--       order by e2.branch_no
     );

SQL Query rewrite, remove ORDER BY clause

Hello,
we've just installed a proprietary application which uses an Oracle 11.2.0.2 RAC database. We've seen that one of the auto-generated application's queries
has poor performance (3-5 minutes for results), the query does a SELECT and at the end it uses an ORDER BY clause. If we remove the ORDER BY clause
the query returns the results in less than 5 seconds. Unfortunately, we can't re-write the query in the application since we don't have any access to it and
i was wondering if there is a way to rewrite the specific query from the database.
We've already seen the SQL Patch but we can change only the hints of the query so we can't remove the ORDER BY clause from it. From what we've seen
outlines also change only the hints and not the actual sql statement.
Is there a way to rewrite the specific query from the database ?
thanks in advance,
Giannis

Maybe DBMS_ADVANCED_REWRITE can help but this a SQL question than has very likely nothing to do with RAC.
See http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/10g/dbms_advanced_rewrite.php.

Query hangs when given order by clause...help needed urgent

Hi ,
I have a table of size 4.1 GB.
QUERY IS :select * from rm_bil_bill order by bill_id desc;
the column Bill_id is primary key.
i have 6GB of temp tablespace.
the normal select works fine but then when it is suffixed with order by clause it is hanging for ever ...
Please help on this...
Thanks,
Ashlee

HI ,
Also like to add some information.
The table has been analysed on july 19th,
the explain plan for the above statement is :
SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE( dbms_xplan.display );
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 178181731
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|
Time |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 24M| 3790M| | 1006K (2)|
03:21:17 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 24M| 3790M| 10G| 1006K (2)|
03:21:17 |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| RM_BIL_BILL | 24M| 3790M| | 123K (5)|
00:24:41 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
9 rows selected.
SQL> SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 178181731
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|
Time |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 24M| 3790M| | 1006K (2)|
03:21:17 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 24M| 3790M| 10G| 1006K (2)|
03:21:17 |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| RM_BIL_BILL | 24M| 3790M| | 123K (5)|
00:24:41 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
9 rows selected.
THE TABLE DESCRIPTION:
SQL> desc rm_p01.RM_BIL_BILL
Name Null? Type
BILL_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(14)
STUDENT_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(14)
STUDENT_UIN NOT NULL VARCHAR2(20)
BILL_MONTH NOT NULL DATE
BILL_TYPE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(10)
SCHOOL_CODE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(10)
LEVEL_GRADE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(10)
CLASS_NAME VARCHAR2(10)
PUPIL_PROFILE_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(14)
BAL_BROUGHT_FORWARD NOT NULL NUMBER(10,2)
BILL_TOTAL_PAYMENT NOT NULL NUMBER(10,2)
BILL_OUTSTANDING_BAL NOT NULL NUMBER(10,2)
BILL_NET_CHARGES NOT NULL NUMBER(10,2)
BILL_TOTAL_PAYABLE NOT NULL NUMBER(10,2)
GENERATION_DATE NOT NULL DATE
GIRO_SO_IND CHAR(1)
GIRO_DEDUCTION_IND CHAR(1)
GIRO_DEDUCTION_DATE DATE
PRINT_DATA_EXTRACTION_IND CHAR(1)
PRINT_DATA_EXTRACTION_DATE DATE
REVIEW_IND CHAR(1)
REVIEW_DATE DATE
REVERSAL_MONTH DATE
VERSION_NO NOT NULL NUMBER(6)
CREATED_BY VARCHAR2(20)
CREATION_DATE DATE
LAST_UPDATED_BY VARCHAR2(20)
LAST_UPDATED_DATE DATE
BANK_ACCOUNT_NUMBER VARCHAR2(12)
BANK_ACRONYM VARCHAR2(30)
the table DDL :
CREATE TABLE "RM_P01"."RM_BIL_BILL"
( "BILL_ID" NUMBER(14,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"STUDENT_ID" NUMBER(14,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"STUDENT_UIN" VARCHAR2(20) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"BILL_MONTH" DATE NOT NULL ENABLE,
"BILL_TYPE" VARCHAR2(10) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"SCHOOL_CODE" VARCHAR2(10) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"LEVEL_GRADE" VARCHAR2(10) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"CLASS_NAME" VARCHAR2(10),
"PUPIL_PROFILE_ID" NUMBER(14,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"BAL_BROUGHT_FORWARD" NUMBER(10,2) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"BILL_TOTAL_PAYMENT" NUMBER(10,2) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"BILL_OUTSTANDING_BAL" NUMBER(10,2) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"BILL_NET_CHARGES" NUMBER(10,2) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"BILL_TOTAL_PAYABLE" NUMBER(10,2) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"GENERATION_DATE" DATE NOT NULL ENABLE,
"GIRO_SO_IND" CHAR(1),
"GIRO_DEDUCTION_IND" CHAR(1),
"GIRO_DEDUCTION_DATE" DATE,
"PRINT_DATA_EXTRACTION_IND" CHAR(1),
"PRINT_DATA_EXTRACTION_DATE" DATE,
"REVIEW_IND" CHAR(1),
"REVIEW_DATE" DATE,
"REVERSAL_MONTH" DATE,
"VERSION_NO" NUMBER(6,0) DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL ENABLE,
"CREATED_BY" VARCHAR2(20),
"CREATION_DATE" DATE DEFAULT SYSDATE,
"LAST_UPDATED_BY" VARCHAR2(20),
"LAST_UPDATED_DATE" DATE DEFAULT SYSDATE,
"BANK_ACCOUNT_NUMBER" VARCHAR2(12),
"BANK_ACRONYM" VARCHAR2(30),
PRIMARY KEY ("BILL_ID")
USING INDEX PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 NOLOGGING COMPUTE STATISTICS
STORAGE(INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT)
TABLESPACE "DATAMEDIUM_RM_P" ENABLE
) PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 NOCOMPRESS NOLOGGING
STORAGE(INITIAL 4294967296 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT)
TABLESPACE "DATAMEDIUM_RM_P"

In Report,order by clause is not working

Hi All,
For the report i prepared the query in this one am using the order by clause,i run the query in the sql plus working fine am getting the data based on the order by clause.when i use the same query for the report am getting the data but not in the order(i.e order by clause in not working).
Please help me how to do this one.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Leelakrishna.G

Hi Dora,
Data is coming in the proper sequence,but in the first group data is not coming(In first group data first line only displaying,remaining data is not comming).
My req is:
The report is executing based on the creation date(i.e.,from creation date to today).
In this so many Purchase requisitions will be there for this one different approval in different times will be there.
For Ex:
we will take 2 PR number only(for the first one 3 approvals,second one 4 levels of approval).
1. one supplier 1person raised by 1PR submit
No Action
Approve
2. 2Supplier 2personraised by 2PR Submit
NO Action
Forword
Approve
with ur suggestion am trying data is gettin fine but first group first line is coming remaining data is not coing.
EX:
1. one supplier 1person raised by 1PR submit
No Action
Approve
2PR Submit
NO Action
Forword
Approve
Note:"2. 2Supplier 2personraised by " this kind of lines data is missing.
Can you pls check and suggest me how i can do this.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Leelakrishna.G

Materialized view and Order by clause

Hi all. I'd like to have some information regarding the order by clause used in a materialized view.
I'm using Oracle 9.2 and Win2003 server. I have a common view (my_common_view) on which a materialized view is based (my_materialized_view). Materialized view is built for fast refresh and is created in this way:
create materialized view my_materialized_view as
select * from my_common_view
order by 1,2,3;
My question is: if I query this materialized view without adding an order by clause in the statement, I will obtain always an ordered result set? So, is it useful to include the order by clause in the materialized view script or the order by has to be include in the statement used for quering the materialized view (for example like this: select * from my_materialized view order by ...)?
Thank you very much.
Ste.

SQL> create table t
2 (x int)
3 /
Table created.
SQL> create view vw
2 as
3 select *
4    from t
5   order by x
6 /
View created.
SQL> select *
2    from v$version
3 /
BANNER
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 9.2.0.7.0 - Production
CORE    9.2.0.7.0       Production
TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 9.2.0.7.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 9.2.0.7.0 - Production
SQL>

Query can't include an "ORDER BY" clause when having column heading sorting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for