Query is running very long when I bring in an attribute
I am running into an issue when i bring in an attribute from the filter. It is taking a very long time to display. When i run the same query against the DSO i copied form it runs fast but not on the one I copied. what could be the issue.
So, you copied an existing report to a new report. Both the reports are on a DSO. Old report runs fine, but the new report runs very long. Is all this correct?
How is the new report different? You said something about an attribute. Are you just displaying this attribute or are you filtering the results using this new attribute?
Without understanding your question clearly, here is my speculation: Your selection filters on the new query are not in any DSO index.
If I misunderstood your question and scenario, then please clarify.
Similar Messages
-
Select sql running very long when made to select many columns from a table
Hi,
I am using an Oracle DB 10g. I have a table with 250 columns and I need to select 200 columns out of them. The table holds around 0.1 million rows. But when I run the select sql it takes 15 mins to return .1 million rows. Where as if I select only 10 or 15 columns the sql runs in less than a minute returning same number of rows. My sql looks like below:
select p.col1,p.col2,.......,p.col200
from table Parent p;
The table also has a Primary key Index but it does not seem to be using it even when I forced an Index hint. Could you pls help?961796 wrote:
I am using an Oracle DB 10g. I have a table with 250 columns and I need to select 200 columns out of them. The table holds around 0.1 million rows. But when I run the select sql it takes 15 mins to return .1 million rows. Where as if I select only 10 or 15 columns the sql runs in less than a minute returning same number of rows. My sql looks like below:
As Sven points out, it is likely that most of your time is network (and client) time. You are sending 20 times as much data (based on column counts, at any rate) across the network, and concerned that it's taking 15 times as long.
If you're testing from SQL*Plus then setting the arraysize to a value larger than the default might help.
If you have control over the SQL*Net settings then you may get some benefit by adjusting the SDU sizes at both ends of the link.
If you have control over the tcp configuration (transmit and receive buffer sizes) then you may get some benefit by adjusting these.
Simple test, by the way, if you're on SQL*Plus
set autotrace traceonly statistics
select ...This will dump your data in the bit bucket as it arrives giving you
a) the database time plus network time
b) some statistics including the volume of data down the network and the number of network round-trips that Oracle saw.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
Author: <b><em>Oracle Core</em></b> -
Query is running very slow when consulting history data in EBS
SELECT *
FROM (select NVL(TO_CHAR(aps.vendor_id), 'SIN PROVEEDOR') CODIGO,
NVL(aps.vendor_name, 'SIN PROVEEDOR') PROVEEDOR,
null IMPORTE_TRANSACCIONAL,
SUM(nvl(CTL.GROSS_EXTENDED_AMOUNT, CTL.EXTENDED_AMOUNT) *
NVL(Cta.EXCHANGE_RATE, 1)) IMPORTE_FUNCIONAL
from ra_customer_trx_all cta,
ra_cust_trx_types_all ctt,
ra_customer_trx_lines_all ctl,
mtl_system_items_b inv,
hz_cust_accounts ca,
hz_parties p,
AR_CUSTOMERS ac,
hz_cust_acct_sites_all hcca,
hz_cust_site_uses_all hcsua,
RA_TERRITORIES rt,
Jtf_Rs_Salesreps vend,
gl_code_combinations glc,
ap_suppliers aps,
(select paa.item_id, paa.vendor_id
from PO_ASL_ATTRIBUTES paa, PO_APPROVED_SUPPLIER_LIST PASL
where Paa.Asl_Id = PASL.Asl_Id(+)
and pasl.disable_flag is null) paa2
where CTA.cust_trx_type_id = ctt.cust_trx_type_id
and ctl.customer_trx_id = cta.customer_trx_id
and ctl.Inventory_Item_Id = inv.inventory_item_id(+)
and ctt.gl_id_rec = glc.code_combination_id
and ca.cust_account_id = cta.bill_to_customer_id
and p.party_id = ca.party_id
and ac.CUSTOMER_ID = cta.bill_to_customer_id
and hcca.cust_account_id = ca.cust_account_id
and hcca.org_id = '82'
and hcsua.site_use_id = cta.bill_to_site_use_id
and hcsua.cust_acct_site_id = hcca.cust_acct_site_id
and hcsua.org_id = '82'
and rt.territory_id(+) = hcca.territory_id
and cta.primary_salesrep_id = vend.salesrep_id(+)
and inv.organization_id = '84'
and paa2.vendor_id = aps.vendor_id(+)
and ctl.inventory_item_id = paa2.item_id(+)
AND CTT.TYPE IN ('INV', 'CM')
and ca.cust_account_id(+) = cta.bill_to_customer_id
and p.party_id(+) = ca.party_id
and ctl.Line_Type = 'LINE'
and cta.complete_flag = 'Y'
and cta.status_trx not in ('VD')
and cta.legal_entity_id = '23274'
and cta.trx_date between to_Date('01/10/2014', 'dd/MM/yyyy') AND
to_Date('13/10/2014', 'dd/MM/yyyy')
group by aps.vendor_id, aps.vendor_name
UNION
select 'SIN ITEM' CODIGO,
'SIN ITEM' PROVEEDOR,
null IMPORTE_TRANSACCIONAL,
SUM(nvl(CTL.GROSS_EXTENDED_AMOUNT, CTL.EXTENDED_AMOUNT) *
NVL(Cta.EXCHANGE_RATE, 1)) IMPORTE_FUNCIONAL
from ra_customer_trx_all cta,
ra_cust_trx_types_all ctt,
ra_customer_trx_lines_all ctl,
hz_cust_accounts ca,
hz_parties p,
AR_CUSTOMERS ac,
hz_cust_acct_sites_all hcca,
hz_cust_site_uses_all hcsua,
RA_TERRITORIES rt,
Jtf_Rs_Salesreps vend,
gl_code_combinations glc
where CTA.cust_trx_type_id = ctt.cust_trx_type_id
and ctl.customer_trx_id = cta.customer_trx_id
and ctl.Inventory_Item_Id is null
and ctt.gl_id_rec = glc.code_combination_id
and ca.cust_account_id = cta.bill_to_customer_id
and p.party_id = ca.party_id
and ac.CUSTOMER_ID = cta.bill_to_customer_id
and hcca.cust_account_id = ca.cust_account_id
and hcca.org_id = '82'
and hcsua.site_use_id = cta.bill_to_site_use_id
and hcsua.cust_acct_site_id = hcca.cust_acct_site_id
and hcsua.org_id = '82'
and rt.territory_id(+) = hcca.territory_id
and cta.primary_salesrep_id = vend.salesrep_id(+)
AND CTT.TYPE IN ('INV', 'CM')
and ca.cust_account_id(+) = cta.bill_to_customer_id
and p.party_id(+) = ca.party_id
and ctl.Line_Type = 'LINE'
and cta.complete_flag = 'Y'
and cta.status_trx not in ('VD')
and cta.legal_entity_id = '23274'
and cta.trx_date between to_Date('01/10/2014', 'dd/MM/yyyy') AND
to_Date('13/10/2014', 'dd/MM/yyyy')
group by 'SIN ITEM', 'SIN ITEM') T_GRUPO
order by DECODE(T_GRUPO.PROVEEDOR,
'SIN ITEM',
'A',
'SIN PROVEEDOR',
'A',
T_GRUPO.PROVEEDOR)Hi Hussein,
APP 12.1.3
Database 11.2.0.3.0
SO linux x86-64
stadistics: 0ne month ago
this slowness is from three months ago
Execution Plan
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 2 | 318 | 12680 (1)|
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 2 | 318 | 12680 (1)|
| 2 | VIEW | | 2 | 318 | 12679 (1)|
| 3 | SORT UNIQUE | | 2 | 697 | 12679 (51)|
| 4 | UNION-ALL | | | | |
| 5 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 377 | 6338 (1)|
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 377 | 6336 (1)|
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 343 | 6336 (1)|
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 328 | 6335 (1)|
| 9 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 323 | 6335 (1)|
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 311 | 6333 (1)|
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 304 | 6332 (1)|
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 296 | 6332 (1)|
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 275 | 6329 (1)|
|* 14 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 192 | 6328 (1)|
|* 15 | HASH JOIN | | 6493 | 450K| 5778 (1)|
|* 16 | HASH JOIN | | 6493 | 367K| 5432 (1)|
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL | 6556 | 288K| 4635 (1)|
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_N5 | 26223 | | 97 (2)|
|* 19 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_ALL | 40227 | 510K| 797 (3)|
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_ALL | 20020 | 254K| 345 (3)|
| 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS | 40020 | 4728K| 549 (3)|
|* 22 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | HZ_PARTIES_U1 | 1| | 0 (0)|
|* 23 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES_ALL | 1 | 21 | 3 (0)|
|* 24 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES_N2 | 4 | | 2 (0)|
|* 25 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1 | 1 | 8 | 0 (0)|
|* 26 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | JTF_RS_SALESREPS_U1 | 1 | 7 | 1 (0)|
|* 27 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | RA_CUST_TRX_TYPES_ALL | 1 | 12 | 2 (0)|
|* 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | RA_CUST_TRX_TYPES_U1 | 1 | | 1 (0)
|* 29 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1 | 1 | 5 | 0 (0)|
| 30 | VIEW PUSHED PREDICATE | | 1 | 15 | 1 (0)|
|* 31 | FILTER | | | | |
| 32 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 54 | 1 (0)|
| 33 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | PO_ASL_ATTRIBUTES | 1 | 39 | 1 (0)|
|* 34 | INDEX SKIP SCAN | PO_ASL_ATTRIBUTES_N1 | 1 | | 1 (0)|
| 35 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | PO_APPROVED_SUPPLIER_LIST | 1 | 15 | 0 (0)|
|* 36 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PO_APPROVED_SUPPLIER_LIST_U1 | 1 | | 0 (0)|
| 37 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | AP_SUPPLIERS | 1 | 34 | 0 (0)|
|* 38 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | AP_SUPPLIERS_U1 | 1 | | 0 (0)|
| 39 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 320 | 6341 (1)|
| 40 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | |
| 41 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 320 | 6340 (1)|
| 42 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 299 | 6337 (1)|
| 43 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 216 | 6336 (1)|
|* 44 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 209 | 6335 (1)|
|* 45 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_ALL | 20020 | 254K | 345 (3)|
|* 46 | HASH JOIN | | 5819 | 1113K | 5989 (1)|
|* 47 | HASH JOIN | | 5875 | 430K | 5439 (1)|
|* 48 | HASH JOIN | | 5931 | 359K | 4641 (1)|
| 49 | NESTED LOOPS | | 38 | 646 | 6 (0)|
|* 50 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | RA_CUST_TRX_TYPES_ALL | 38 | 456 | 6 (0)|
|* 51 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1 | 1 | 5 | 0 (0)|
|* 52 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL | 6556 | 288K | 4635 (1)|
|* 53 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_N5 | 26223 | | 97 (2)|
|* 54 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_ALL | 40227 | 510K | 797 (3)|
| 55 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS | 40020 | 4728K | 549 (3)|
|* 56 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | JTF_RS_SALESREPS_U1 | 1 | 7 | 1 (0)|
|* 57 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | HZ_PARTIES_U1 | 1 | | 0 (0)|
|* 58 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES_N2 | 4 | | 2 (0)|
|* 59 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES_ALL | 1 | 21 | 3 (0)|
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
14 - access("CUST"."CUST_ACCOUNT_ID"="CTA"."BILL_TO_CUSTOMER_ID" AND
"HCCA"."CUST_ACCOUNT_ID"="CUST_ACCOUNT_ID")
15 - access("HCSUA"."CUST_ACCT_SITE_ID"="HCCA"."CUST_ACCT_SITE_ID")
16 - access("HCSUA"."SITE_USE_ID"="CTA"."BILL_TO_SITE_USE_ID")
17 - filter("CTA"."COMPLETE_FLAG"='Y' AND "CTA"."STATUS_TRX"<>'VD' AND "CTA"." LEGAL_ENTITY_ID"=23274)
18 - access("CTA"."TRX_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2014-01-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh2
4:mi:ss') AND
"CTA"."TRX_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2014-10-13 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh2
4:mi:ss'))
19 - filter("HCSUA"."ORG_ID"=82)
20 - filter("HCCA"."ORG_ID"=82)
22 - access("PARTY_ID"="PARTY_ID")
23 - filter("CTL"."INVENTORY_ITEM_ID" IS NOT NULL AND "CTL"."LINE_TYPE"='LINE'
24 - access("CTL"."CUSTOMER_TRX_ID"="CTA"."CUSTOMER_TRX_ID")
25 - access("CTL"."INVENTORY_ITEM_ID"="INV"."INVENTORY_ITEM_ID" AND "INV"."ORG
ANIZATION_ID"=84)
26 - access("CTA"."PRIMARY_SALESREP_ID"="VEND"."SALESREP_ID"(+))
27 - filter("CTT"."GL_ID_REC" IS NOT NULL AND ("CTT"."TYPE"='CM' OR "CTT"."TYP
E"='INV'))
28 - access("CTA"."CUST_TRX_TYPE_ID"="CTT"."CUST_TRX_TYPE_ID")
29 - access("CTT"."GL_ID_REC"="GLC"."CODE_COMBINATION_ID")
31 - filter("PASL"."DISABLE_FLAG" IS NULL)
34 - access("PAA"."ITEM_ID"="CTL"."INVENTORY_ITEM_ID")
filter("PAA"."ITEM_ID"="CTL"."INVENTORY_ITEM_ID")
36 - access("PAA"."ASL_ID"="PASL"."ASL_ID"(+))
38 - access("PAA2"."VENDOR_ID"="APS"."VENDOR_ID"(+))
44 - access("HCCA"."CUST_ACCOUNT_ID"="CUST_ACCOUNT_ID" AND
"HCSUA"."CUST_ACCT_SITE_ID"="HCCA"."CUST_ACCT_SITE_ID")
45 - filter("HCCA"."ORG_ID"=82)
46 - access("CUST"."CUST_ACCOUNT_ID"="CTA"."BILL_TO_CUSTOMER_ID")
47 - access("HCSUA"."SITE_USE_ID"="CTA"."BILL_TO_SITE_USE_ID")
48 - access("CTA"."CUST_TRX_TYPE_ID"="CTT"."CUST_TRX_TYPE_ID")
50 - filter("CTT"."GL_ID_REC" IS NOT NULL AND ("CTT"."TYPE"='CM' OR "CTT"."TYP
E"='INV'))
51 - access("CTT"."GL_ID_REC"="GLC"."CODE_COMBINATION_ID")
52 - filter("CTA"."COMPLETE_FLAG"='Y' AND "CTA"."STATUS_TRX"<>'VD' AND "CTA"."
LEGAL_ENTITY_ID"=23274)
53 - access("CTA"."TRX_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2014-01-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh2
4:mi:ss') AND
"CTA"."TRX_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2014-10-13 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh2
4:mi:ss'))
54 - filter("HCSUA"."ORG_ID"=82)
56 - access("CTA"."PRIMARY_SALESREP_ID"="VEND"."SALESREP_ID"(+))
57 - access("PARTY_ID"="PARTY_ID")
58 - access("CTL"."CUSTOMER_TRX_ID"="CTA"."CUSTOMER_TRX_ID")
59 - filter("CTL"."INVENTORY_ITEM_ID" IS NULL AND "CTL"."LINE_TYPE"='LINE')
Note
- 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
Statistics
15 recursive calls
0 db block gets
62543652 consistent gets
269141 physical reads
172 redo size
12832 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
674 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
16 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
2 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
212 rows processed -
Oracle 10gr2 Master/detail form running very slow when you navigate to the detail record.
Hi All, I have a master detail form, running in webserver, when I navigate to the detail block, the form start buffering and buttering for about 2 min. There is a trigger when-new-record instance that is firing when you navigate to a new record : The select part of this stament is taken a long time to execute. I modified this in toad and what used to take 25 seconds to run is taken less than a second now, but the slowness still persists in the form.
for rec in (select wrrh_col
wpbh_col_lvd,
wpbh_col_doc_no
from wh_col,
wkpl_col,
wh_col
where wrrh_col_no = :block.wreh_wrrh_col_no
and wrrh_col_no = wreh_wrrh_col_no
and wrrh_col_no = wpbh_col_no
and wrrh_col_proj = wpbh_col_proj
and wrrh_proj_no = wpbh_proj_no) loop
if fun_name(rec.wpbh_col_lvd) = 'Y' then
do something,
end if;
end loop;
The select staement that used to run for 23 seconds is running in less than one second, but the form is still running very slow when I navigate to the detail record.
Please advise.
Thanks.Thanks Andrea for your prompt response, the problem is the select statement and like I stated, I tuned the select statement in toad and what normally takes 23 secs is taking less than 1 sec to run. If I comment out the call to the function, it is still slow. The select stament will returned null and it will still be slow. When I comment out the for loop, it run very fast. I dont know what else to do than tuned the select statement.
-
My MacBook Pro is running very slow when using the internet and sometimes gives the pinwheel of death, any suggestions on how to fix?
<http://www.thexlab.com/faqs/sbbod.html>
-
FOR UPDATE causing query to take very long to execute.. What can we do ??
SELECT cell_data
FROM csv_workfile
WHERE cell_row = p_r
AND cell_column = p_c
FOR UPDATE;
this is our query. it take very long to execute.
wat can we do to get it working properly.
this is real real urgent .
RagardsHi,
first ask yourself if a SELECT FOR UPDATE is really necessary. If so, try to use an FOR UPDATE OF <attribute>. If there are many users accessing and updateing this table try NOWAIT Option. Your process will not be blocked on case of another lock. You will get error ORA-00054 and can do other things while waiting.
Keep in mind that locks will only released after COMMIT.
But remember to ask yourself. Row locking can be very time consuming. If you can avoid it.
Bye,
Holger -
Adobe Premier pro running very slow when rendering a file
Adobe Premier pro running very slow when rendering a file
Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
The title of the Console window should be All Messages. If it isn't, select
SYSTEM LOG QUERIES ▹ All Messages
from the log list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar at the top of the screen. Click the Clear Display icon in the toolbar. Then take one of the actions that you're having trouble with. Select any messages that appear in the Console window. Copy them to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. Paste into a reply to this message by pressing command-V.
The log contains a vast amount of information, almost all of which is irrelevant to solving any particular problem. When posting a log extract, be selective. A few dozen lines are almost always more than enough.
Please don't indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Please don't post screenshots of log messages—post the text.
Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting. -
Launch ASCP plan run very long time
Hi,
I launched constrained ASCP plan and it took very long time. I launch ASCP plan in friday and it still not finished yet till monday, Memory Based Shapshot & Snapshot Delete Worker are still running, Loader Worker With Direct Load Option is still in pending phase. MSC: Share Plan Partitions has been set to Yes.
When I run query below :
select table_name,
partition_name
from all_tab_partitions
where table_name like 'MSC_NET_RES_INST%'
OR table_name like 'MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS%'
order by substr(partition_name,instr(partition_name,'_',-1,1)+1);
The results are:
MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
SYSTEM_ITEMS_0
MSC_NET_RES_INST_AVAIL
NET_RES_INST_AVAIL_0
MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
SYSTEM_ITEMS_1
MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
SYSTEM_ITEMS__21
MSC_NET_RES_INST_AVAIL
NET_RES_INST_AVAIL__21
MSC_NET_RES_INST_AVAIL
NET_RES_INST_AVAIL_999999
MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
SYSTEM_ITEMS_999999
Please help me how to increase the performance when launching the plan. Is change MSC: Share Plan Partitions to No the only way to increase the performance in running plan?
Thanks & Regards,
YolandaHi Yolanda,
a) So does it means that plan was working fine earlier but you are facing this issue recently.. ? If so then what you have changed at server side or have you applied any recent patches.. ?
b) If you have not completed plan for single time,
I will suggest that run data collection in complete refresh mode for one organization which is having relatively small data. Further, you can modify plan options in order to reduce planning calculation load like
- disable pegging
- remove any demand schedule / supply schedule / global forecast etc
- enable only single organization which having relatively small demand and supply picture
- disable forecast spread
Once one plan run will be completed, then expand your collection scope to other organizations and also enabling above mentioned setting.
There are lots of points need to consider for performance issue like server configuration, hardware configuration, num of demands etc. So you can raise SR in parallel while working on above points.
Thanks,
D -
MacBook Pro run very slow when open Contacts
My MacBook Pro (earlie 2011) run very slow. When open Contacs show the color ball. I can't see duplicates contacs.
Back up all data.
1. If you use iCloud, uncheck the box marked Contacts in the iCloud preference pane. Press return to confirm, or click Keep on Mac in the dialog that opens.
2. From the list of groups on the left side of the Contacts window, select All On My Mac. If that group doesn't exist or is empty, skip this step. Otherwise, from the menu bar, select
File ▹ Export ▹ Export vCard
Save the exported contacts to the Desktop.
3. Quit Contacts. Triple-click the text on the line below on this page to select it, then copy it to the Clipboard (command-C):
~/Library/Application Support/AddressBook
In the Finder, select
Go ▹ Go to Folder
from the menu bar, paste into the box that opens (command-V), and press return.
A Finder window will open with a folder selected. Move the selected folder to the Desktop, leaving the window open for now.
4. Launch Contacts. Your contacts will be gone. If you took Step 2, then double-click the file you created in that step and confirm that you want to import from it. Your contacts will reappear.
5. Re-enable Contacts in the iCloud preference pane, if you disabled it. Test. If the issue is resolved, delete the AddressBook folder and the vCard file on the Desktop and close the open folder window.
Otherwise, quit Contacts again and put the AddressBook folder back where it was, overwriting the newer one that will have been created in its place. Post your results. -
When we nagivate in IE in TFS Web Access, to the WORK -> Work Items page, TFS runs the AssignedToMe query and focuses on it as sort of default query that runs in such event. We have some teams under the team project, but AssignedToMe is not sensitive
to Team, only to Team Project, hence when navigating to the page of the specific team, this query shows the same per all teams :(.
In order to bypass this, we'd like to set a specific team query to be the default one to run when navigating to the team's page, instead of AssignedToMe, and thus have the result specific to each team scope.
Alternatively if it is possible to somehow filter AssignedToMe query according to Team Scope it would be great. Alas there's no @Team field yet, and we don't wish to create multiple AssignedToMe queries and name each specific to each team, nor do we wish
to put team queries in MyFavorites while naming them specifically per team..
Kindly advise, thank youHi Moital,
Thanks for your post.
As far as I know there’s no default way to the default query(AssignedToMe) in Work Items page, we usually add uses in different teams. If the user want to view the work items in one specific team, he can create a my query to filter work items according team
field value.
Yes, as you said there’s no @Team value in Team field to filter current team’s work items in work item query, so if you want create the shared query according team values, you need create this shared query for each team.
For the Team field, please refer to the information in this document:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn144940(v=vs.110).aspx.
For this scenario, you can submit it to User Voice site at: http://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/121579-visual-studio. Microsoft engineers will evaluate them
seriously.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey. -
Calc scripts running very Long time
Hi All,
Recently, i am migrated the objects from Production to Test region. We have 5 applications and each of the application has a set of calc scripts.
In test region, they are running really long time. Where as in Production, they run for less time.
In TEST region each Calc script is taking 10 times more time than the Production times.
No Dimension added or no script is updated. No difference in objects between TEST and PROD.
Please suggest me, why is this difference.
Thanks
MaheshThe obvious first question would be if the hardware is different. You would expect prod to be a more powerful server and therefore perform better.I'm seeing a lot of virtualized test servers (who knows, really, what power the box has) and real prod servers. That can make a huge difference in performance.
It makes benchmarking tough -- yes, you can see how long something will take relative to another process, but there isn't any way to know how it will perform in production until you sneak it over there and benchmark it. It can be a real PITA for Planning.
And yes, the theory is that dev and prod are similar so that the above isn't an issue, but that seems to be a more theoretical than actual kind of thing.
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour -
Internet running very slowly when using external monitor.
I've used my HDTV as an external monitor for my various MacBooks for years with no problems. I bought a 17-inch MacBook Pro, and it worked perfectly doing the same thing for the first few months that I had it. Recently it has started to have very poor Internet speed, but only when I connect it to my TV. The Internet and my Airport Extreme are not the cause, as no one else in the house has this issue and my iPad loads sites as fast as it ever has. Plus, the MacBook Pro in question has an excellent connection once I disconnect it from the external monitor.
What could be the cause of this? I updated to 10.7.2 way back when it was released and only had problems very recently. Is there anything I can do without having to take it to the Apple Store?Are you sure that the internet is running slowly? Or, because you're using an external monitor, you're using more memory than before and you're having some issues with memory access? You can open Activity Monitor and see how much free memory you have.
One other thing. Are you using discrete video when you're connected to a monitor? Or are you using the integrated Intel HD3000 video. -
Hello all,
I am new to posting on this forum but I really hope that someone out there can help me out. I have a 13" MacBook Pro, 2.53 GHz Core 2 Duo, 4GB 1067 MHz DDR3, running OSX 10.6.8. My problem is that when I unplug the laptop form the charger and run it on the battery, the computer becomes unresponsive to any commands at all. It basically really slows down to a crawl. Even when rebooting it will take 5-10 minutes or more to do so. The odd thing is, when it gets plugged back in while any of this is going on, within a minute or two it works perfectly. It has been in a mac authorized repair shop for 7 weeks and has had a new logic board and a new hard drive replaced. The battery was tested and charges fine, holds a charge when unplugged, and the system profile shows the battery at Normal. Recently, many knowledgeable mac enthusiasts gave me tip that might help. Here is what I did: Ran an SMC reboot (no success), rebooted the computer under safe mode then unplugged it to test (no success), and ran a hardware test on the install disk (showed hardware ok)
I am at a loss as to what to do next. It has become impossible to use this laptop for my classes when it is unplugged. I am about ready to just go buy a new one, and call this one a goner.
I am hoping someone reading this can help with any other ideas on its problem. Help? Anyone?
SteveLPBassman,
since the tech in your IT department was able to copy your daughter’s data from her MacBook Pro’s internal disk, I’d suggest completely erasing the internal disk (using Disk Utility in Recovery mode, reformatting it with a “Mac OS Extended (Journaled)” filesystem), reïnstalling its original version of Mac OS X (either Snow Leopard from the grey Mac OS X Install DVD if it originally came with two grey DVDs, or Lion via OS X Internet Recovery if no grey DVDs originally came with it), running Software Update to get it to 10.6.8 or 10.7.5 respectively, reïnstalling Mavericks, running Software Update again to get it up to date, and finally restoring your daughter’s data. -
ABAP report /VIRSA/ZVFATBAK run very long on backend
Hello experts,
For ABAP report /VIRSA/ZVFATBAK which runs in the backend system, normally how long would it take to finish? Because now the duration for the report is already 2k++ seconds and its still running in our test system, while the report scheduled in our development system only uses 1 or 2 secs to finish.
Any idea why is it taking that long in a test system?
Appreciate the replies, thank you in advance.Thank you for the note sabita! Its really helpful.
One question regarding the sapnote, it mentioned STAT collector job, is this a standard job?
If yes, below are the standard collector jobs which is scheduled in the system, which would it be?
SAP_COLLECTOR_FOR_JOBSTATISTIC
SAP_COLLECTOR_FOR_NONE_R3_STAT
SAP_COLLECTOR_FOR_PERFMONITOR -
UTLRP.SQL run very long, how to check ?
Hello all
Need your help and advice on my problem that i facing now,
I did to recompile all the object in oracle using
@UTLRP.SQL in $ORACLE_HOME\rdbms\admin
The sql was running about 4 hours but still running, but actually i dont know is it hang or still running
My question is
- is this normal, since that already run for 4 hours
- how to check whether is still running or hang, I did check on the task manager, the oracle.exe keep moving
- Can i cancell it ? any problem later on if i cancel it ?
- Is there any log to check
Sorry so many question, need all of your advice
Thanks in advance
Cheers
SuryaYou can check the decreasing number of invalid objects using below query:
select count(*) from dba_objects where status = 'INVALID'You can also check session waits for that session that is running utlrp.sql
With kind regards
Krystian Zieja
http://www.projectenvision.com
Maybe you are looking for
-
I am fairly new to doing web page updates through Dreamweaver. I currently switched from IE to Firefox. When I make changes on web pages and download them IE shows the changes but Firefox does not, on my computer. == This happened == Every time Firef
-
Please help me my iPad freezes all the tine.
O.K. so my iPad is cracked, but that can't be the reason why my screen completly freezes. I don't know why it does this. If you could tell me how to prevent this from happening or how to fix it without having to restore my iPad on the computer everyt
-
IMessage - Idle timer setting?
Is it possible to change the default "idle time" in iMessage before it changes status to "Away"? Running OS X 10.8.2 on a MBP. I checked all the preference settings in the iMessage UI, but nothing seems to exist for controlling when the system automa
-
Aaa authentication using tacacs+ for LAP
WIth Autonomous AP, you can configure aaa authtentication using Tacacs+. In lightweight AP, do u have similar function where u authenticate using tacacs+ when u telnet/ssh into the LAP after it is registered to the WLC? Rgds Eng Wee
-
hi friend ... po me23n can anyone tell me the table and field name of still to be delivered quantity by ramesh.