Query with additional condition

select * from (select b.account, f.company from account a, company f
where f.company=b.company
and f.company_type='BIZ') where rownum<=10
So, these are two tables I am drawing data from. I also need to pull the data from the account table where there is no company information attached to it. In that case, b.company would be null and subsequently there would be no f.company or f.company_type. Any help mucho appreciated!!!!

You need to do a outer join. Like this
select a.account
     , f.company
from account a
left
join company f
    on f.company= a.company
   and f.company_type = 'BIZ';
The query you have posted is incorrect. You have used an alias b in your select column but there is no such alias. Also whats the deal with ROWNUM filter?

Similar Messages

BDC select query with addition based on all If conditions

Hi can any one send me the select query with conditions like
If Itab is not initial.
Endif. and if possible with valiadations messages also.
IF CHECK_NUMBER of CHECK_ADVICE of the flat file = PAYR-CHECT. Then update SAP field BSEG-XREF2 .
9.     When Flat file check Number = PAYR-CHECT then Insert or Update Flat file RECEIPT_DATE into SAP field BSEG-XREF1.
Please send me immediately.

>     SELECT rsnum
>            rspos
>            matnr
>            werks
>         lgort
>            shkzg
>            aufnr
>            bdmng
>            enmng
>            FROM resb INTO TABLE it_rsnum FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_aufnr
>            WHERE rsnum EQ it_aufnr-rsnum
>            AND   xloek NE 'X'
>            AND   postp NE 'X'
>            AND   resbbdmng GE resbenmng.
>   ENDIF.
>
> Database Table RESB: 40,000,000 Records (40 Million)
> Internal Table   it_aufnr: 20,000 Entries
> Entries selected from RESB: 150,000.
>
Hi,
the problem is the big for all entries table.
Your 20.000 records FAE will be split into SEVERAL sql statements depending on the size of the table.
Where do you get the it_auftrn from?
If it's another transparent table try to JOIN this table to your big table.
SELECT rsnum
            rspos
            matnr
            werks
        lgort
            shkzg
            aufnr
            bdmng
            enmng
            FROM resb JOIN tab_auftrn on resbrsnum = tab_auftrnauftrn
            AND   xloek NE 'X'
            AND   postp NE 'X'
            AND   resbbdmng GE resbenmng.
Make sure that your WHERE filter and the JOIN keys on both tables are supported by indexes.
150.000 records about of 40 Mio. can definitly be serviced by an appropriate index:
i.e. Index fields (check your PK or secondary indexes):
rsnum
enmng
aufnr
bye
yk

Query with a condition - Overall results row displays incorrect value

Hi All,
I have a bw query with top 40 conditions. However, The Overall Result Row Figures Do Not Equal The Sum of the Column Rows.
Although the top condition is activated, the overall result still displays the overall result of the whole report.
I have 3 columns in the report
Selected Period
Prior Period and
Variance
The formula for variance is (Selected Period/Prior Period)-1.
Does anyone have an idea to fix this?
Thank you so much in advance.
Have a great day!

Hi Gaurav,
Thank you so much for your reply, however this does not solve fully the issue.
Changing the properties to "Summation" will indeed provide me with the correct sum for the "selected period" and "Prior Period." However what I need in the Overall Result Row for the "Variance" column is not the total but instead the value when the total of Selected Period is divided by Prior Period then minus 1.
Overall Variance = (Overall Selected Period/Overall Prior Period)-1
Do you know a way to make this possible.
Thank you so much.

Query with a condition - Overall results row is wrong

Hello,
I have a query that uses a condition. The query gives me the top 10 brands according to the Net Sales. The query itself runs fine. I just noticed however that the Overall Result row isn't giving me the correct number.
For example:
<b>BRAND            NETSALES    MARGIN %</b>
Brand1           $100        25%
Brand2           $60         10%
Brand3           $20         15%
<b>OVERALL RESULT   $210        2%</b>
As you can see it does not add up or average correctly. This query has no macros or anything, it only uses a condition.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Nick

A workaround I have found is the manual directions in this OSS note: 572910
Anyone have any follow up?
Thanks.
Nick

To create query with selecting condition have AND options

Hi All ,
I want to create a query in SQ01 . I want to get data from a table whose one specific field have data starting with Z AND Z : * ( not OR )* . Is it possible to do any thing in the selection screen or i have to do any other change ?
Please help me in this.
Thanks & Regards ,
Sabu.

Hi
Your select statment u can have
field in ( 'Z%' , 'Z:%')
you will get all fields starting with z and Z;
regards

SQL query with multiple condition

Below is the sample table
ID     RATE     DATE     ORGAMNT     PAYAMOUNT
1     3.45     12/23/2012     23000.45     19060.23
2.    5.50     04/12/2013     45000.00     36000.54
3.     6.44    04/16/200     60000.00     20000.00
Select a table with highest rate, Orgamnt with Date closer to current date.

with
data_table as
(select 11186 hnum,11607400 oma,to_date('2/1/2006','mm/dd/yyyy') fpay,5.51 irate,10580934.67 apb,'WELLS FARGO BANK NA' hname from dual union all
select 11188,4801800,to_date('9/1/2006','mm/dd/yyyy'),6.3,4326951.51,'PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION' hname from dual union all
select 11189,1236100,to_date('8/1/2006','mm/dd/yyyy'),6.15,1147108.9,'HEARTLAND BANK' hname from dual union all
select 11192,1578400,to_date('4/1/2007','mm/dd/yyyy'),5.82,1470926.86,'WELLS FARGO BANK NA' hname from dual union all
select 11193,8150400,to_date('12/1/2008','mm/dd/yyyy'),6.75,7828776.28,'OPPENHEIMER MULTIFAMILY HSG' hname from dual union all
select 11195,3898000,to_date('5/1/2009','mm/dd/yyyy'),6.5,3752154.96,'BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE' hname from dual union all
select 11196,8040000,to_date('6/1/2009','mm/dd/yyyy'),7,7775734.57,'OPPENHEIMER MULTIFAMILY HSG' hname from dual union all
select 11197,37315000,to_date('12/1/2009','mm/dd/yyyy'),5.5,35851362.87,'RED MORTGAGE CAPITAL LLC' hname from dual union all
select 11199,3824000,to_date('2/1/2010','mm/dd/yyyy'),5.25,3673760.35,'WALKER AND DUNLOP LLC' hname from dual union all
select 11200,26927000,to_date('7/1/2010','mm/dd/yyyy'),4.7,25186682.65,'OAK GROVE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE' hname from dual union all
select 11201,7208600,to_date('10/1/2010','mm/dd/yyyy'),4.59,6949026.64,'BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE' hname from dual union all
select 11204,9300000,to_date('2/1/2011','mm/dd/yyyy'),3.41,8927064.51,'PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION' hname from dual union all
select 11205,5200000,to_date('2/1/2011','mm/dd/yyyy'),3.56,4997518.18,'LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION' hname from dual union all
select 11206,6800000,to_date('5/1/2011','mm/dd/yyyy'),3.88,6576635.57,'WELLS FARGO BANK NA' hname from dual union all
select 11208,12240000,to_date('8/1/2011','mm/dd/yyyy'),3.84,11879882.17,'WELLS FARGO BANK NA' hname from dual union all
select 11209,12911500,to_date('10/1/2011','mm/dd/yyyy'),3.55,12542199.51,'M AND T REALTY CAPITAL CORP' hname from dual union all
select 11210,9596900,to_date('7/1/2011','mm/dd/yyyy'),5.38,9323421.23,'LANCASTER POLLARD MORTGAGE' hname from dual union all
select 11211,19951600,to_date('9/1/2011','mm/dd/yyyy'),3.88,19393524.45,'DEUTSCHE BANK BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE' hname from dual union all
select 11183,4230000,to_date('4/1/2009','mm/dd/yyyy'),6.55,4069938.75,'BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE' hname from dual union all
select 11212,50475000,to_date('1/1/2013','mm/dd/yyyy'),2.37,49852632.51,'LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION' hname from dual union all
select 11213,5496000,to_date('5/1/2012','mm/dd/yyyy'),3.1,5377541.15,'WELLS FARGO BANK NA' hname from dual
select hnum,oma,fpay,irate,apb,hname,r_oma,r_irate,r_fpay,0.5 * r_oma + 0.3 * r_irate + 0.2 * r_fpay r
from (select hnum,oma,fpay,irate,apb,hname,
               dense_rank() over (order by oma desc) r_oma,
               dense_rank() over (order by irate desc) r_irate,
               dense_rank() over (order by (sysdate - fpay)) r_fpay
          from data_table
order by r
HNUM
OMA
FPAY
IRATE
APB
HNAME
R_OMA
R_IRATE
R_FPAY
R
11197
37315000
12/01/2009
5.5
35851362.87
RED MORTGAGE CAPITAL LLC
2
9
12
6.1
11212
50475000
01/01/2013
2.37
49852632.51
LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION
1
20
1
6.7
11211
19951600
09/01/2011
3.88
19393524.45
DEUTSCHE BANK BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE
4
14
4
7
11200
26927000
07/01/2010
4.7
25186682.65
OAK GROVE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
3
12
10
7.1
11209
12911500
10/01/2011
3.55
12542199.51
M AND T REALTY CAPITAL CORP
5
17
3
8.2
11210
9596900
07/01/2011
5.38
9323421.23
LANCASTER POLLARD MORTGAGE
8
10
6
8.2
11196
8040000
06/01/2009
7
7775734.57
OPPENHEIMER MULTIFAMILY HSG
11
1
13
8.4
11208
12240000
08/01/2011
3.84
11879882.17
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
6
15
5
8.5
11193
8150400
12/01/2008
6.75
7828776.28
OPPENHEIMER MULTIFAMILY HSG
10
2
16
8.8
11186
11607400
02/01/2006
5.51
10580934.67
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
7
8
20
9.9
11204
9300000
02/01/2011
3.41
8927064.51
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
9
18
8
11.5
11201
7208600
10/01/2010
4.59
6949026.64
BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
12
13
9
11.7
11206
6800000
05/01/2011
3.88
6576635.57
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
13
14
7
12.1
11183
4230000
04/01/2009
6.55
4069938.75
BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
17
3
15
12.4
11195
3898000
05/01/2009
6.5
3752154.96
BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
18
4
14
13
11188
4801800
09/01/2006
6.3
4326951.51
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
16
5
18
13.1
11213
5496000
05/01/2012
3.1
5377541.15
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
14
19
2
13.1
11205
5200000
02/01/2011
3.56
4997518.18
LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION
15
16
8
13.9
11199
3824000
02/01/2010
5.25
3673760.35
WALKER AND DUNLOP LLC

CAML Query with 10 AND conditions

Hello,
I need some help with a CAML query. This particular query needs to have 10 AND conditions. Quite frankly, with all the nesting it is driving me a little nuts:
What I have is:
<Query>
<Where>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column1' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>10341</Value></Eq>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column2' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>9539</Value></Eq>
</And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column3' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>183</Value></Eq>
</And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column4' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>35</Value></Eq>
</And>
<IsNull><FieldRef Name='Column5' /></IsNull>
</And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column6' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>4387</Value></Eq>
</And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column7' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>4204</Value></Eq>
</And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column8' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>36</Value></Eq>
</And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column9' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>213</Value></Eq>
</And>
<IsNull><FieldRef Name='Column10' /></IsNull>
</And>
</Where>
</Query>
I have added this into my ItemAdding Event Receiver as it will basically do a check for duplicate items based on the 10 columns.
If anyone can help guide me in this, it would be much appreciated. I have been using a CAML Query Builder to help.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xji7jOxa5_EJ:aasai-sharepoint.blogspot.com/2013/02/caml-query-with-multiple-conditions.html+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6203821/caml-query-with-nested-ands-and-ors-for-multiple-fields
Since you are not allowed to put more than two conditions in one condition group (And | Or) you have to create an extra nested group (MSDN). The expression
A AND B AND C looks like this:
<And>
A
<And>
B
C
</And>
</And>
Your SQL like sample translated to CAML (hopefully with matching XML tags ;) ):
<Where>
<And>
<Or>
<Eq>
<FieldRef Name='FirstName' />
<Value Type='Text'>John</Value>
</Eq>
<Or>
<Eq>
<FieldRef Name='LastName' />
<Value Type='Text'>John</Value>
</Eq>
<Eq>
<FieldRef Name='Profile' />
<Value Type='Text'>John</Value>
</Eq>
</Or>
</Or>
<And>
<Or>
<Eq>
<FieldRef Name='FirstName' />
<Value Type='Text'>Doe</Value>
</Eq>
<Or>
<Eq>
<FieldRef Name='LastName' />
<Value Type='Text'>Doe</Value>
</Eq>
<Eq>
<FieldRef Name='Profile' />
<Value Type='Text'>Doe</Value>
</Eq>
</Or>
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

Sap query and additional fields.

Hello guys.
ABAP it's not my strong skill, but i need to develop some report.
What i need:
input: material, SLED, plant
output: material, SLED, plant, values from characteristic field.
I have created sap query with additional field type c.
Below my code:
TYPES: BEGIN OF charast,
        ATNAM(50)    TYPE c,
        ATWTB(8)     TYPE n,
        X(50)        TYPE n,
        C(50)        TYPE n,
        ATINN(50)    TYPE n,
        END OF charast.
DATA: char TYPE TABLE OF charast WITH HEADER LINE.
CALL FUNCTION 'VB_BATCH_GET_DETAIL'
   EXPORTING
     MATNR              = MCH1-MATNR
     CHARG              = MCH1-CHARG
     GET_CLASSIFICATION = 'X'
   TABLES
     CHAR_OF_BATCH      = char.
LOOP AT char into TEST (This is an additional field type C.
   ENDLOOP.
Questions:
1. How i can return internal table into standard abap type, because i can create additional field only with standart types.
2. Need i fetch exporting parameters before calling FM? Or sap query do it automatically, based on given values on selection screen of the report?
3. How i can return only needed field from FM output? Now, when i'm executing FM via SE37 it's show desired result, but when i'm getting it from code i see strange values.
4. If i don't know exactly return by an FM values, how i can fill structure dynamically?
5. How i can return result of a program not only to additional field but to layout?
Sorry for noob questions and thank you in advance guys!

Well, seems like it work fine for me.
Below my crappy, but working code:
DATA: material TYPE MCHB-MATNR,
       batch    TYPE MCHB-CHARG,
       plant    TYPE MCHB-WERKS,
       sloc     TYPE MCHB-LGORT,
       gtdt     TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF clbatch,
       gtdit    TYPE clbatch.
SELECT MATNR INTO material FROM MCHB
   WHERE MATNR = MCHB-MATNR.
ENDSELECT.
SELECT CHARG INTO batch FROM MCHB
   WHERE CHARG = MCHB-CHARG.
ENDSELECT.
SELECT WERKS INTO plant FROM MCHB
   WHERE WERKS = MCHB-WERKS.
ENDSELECT.
SELECT LGORT INTO sloc FROM MCHB
   WHERE LGORT = MCHB-LGORT.
ENDSELECT.
CALL FUNCTION 'VB_BATCH_GET_DETAIL'
   EXPORTING
     MATNR = material
     CHARG = batch
     WERKS = plant
     GET_CLASSIFICATION = 'X'
    TABLES
      CHAR_OF_BATCH = gtdt.
READ TABLE gtdt INTO gtdit
   WITH KEY atnam = 'BATCH_SHELF_LIFE_EXPIRY_DATE'.
GTD = gtdit-ATWTB.

SQ02 - Query with adicional fields

Hi, I need your help to develop a query with additional fields.
The case is that:
In my query I only have a table VBAK and my propose is that this query returns me the quantity that are in a sales document for some material that should be selection parameters.
So I create 2 additional fields: one that is the u2018 Material u2018 that have no codification and other that is the quantity that have the code:
select single ZMENG into quantity from VBAK where matnr = material.
But the result is null, I don't know why.
Can you help me?
Thanks in advance.
Dora

Hi,
MATNR is not available in VBAK !
You have to create first an info-set using SQ02 : here you link VBAK and VBAP, and select the fields you need.
From SQ01, create a new query where matnr is a selection field ....

Query with progressive code

Hi,
I've this table:
COD_ID.....................DESC_COD
MT001......................PAL
MT001......................PAL
NS007......................PAL
NS007......................TRA
NM332......................RIP
NM332......................RIP
NM332......................RIP
NM332......................RIP
NB112......................RIP
VT774......................PAL
VT774......................RIP
VT774......................PAL
NT999......................PAL
............................. --other 1000 records
I'd like to write one query with this condition:
If DESC_COD = PAL I must add at the column COD_ID "-Pn" with n = 0 to 99
If DESC_COD = TRA I must add at the column COD_ID "-Tn" with n = 0 to 99
If DESC_COD = RIP I must add at the column COD_ID "-Rn" with n = 0 to 99
If DESC_COD = PAL and COD_ID has 3 same values I'll get COD_ID-P01, COD_ID-P02, COD_ID-P03
If DESC_COD = RIP and COD_ID has 5 same values I'll get COD_ID-R01, COD_ID-R02, COD_ID-R03, COD_ID-R04, COD_ID-R05
In my case I'd like this output:
COD_ID.....................DESC_COD
MT001-P01..................PAL
MT001-P02..................PAL
NS007-P01..................PAL
NS007-R01..................TRA
NM332-R01..................RIP
NM332-R02..................RIP
NM332-R03..................RIP
NM332-R04..................RIP
NB112-R01..................RIP
VT774-P01..................PAL
VT774-R01..................RIP
VT774-P02..................PAL
NT999-P01..................PAL
............................. --other 1000 records
Thank in advance!

It's always good to test it ...
SQL> create table mytable (cod_id,desc_cod)
2 as
3 select 'MT001', 'PAL' from dual union all
4 select 'MT001', 'PAL' from dual union all
5 select 'NS007', 'PAL' from dual union all
6 select 'NS007', 'TRA' from dual union all
7 select 'NM332', 'RIP' from dual union all
8 select 'NM332', 'RIP' from dual union all
9 select 'NM332', 'RIP' from dual union all
10 select 'NM332', 'RIP' from dual union all
11 select 'NB112', 'RIP' from dual union all
12 select 'VT774', 'PAL' from dual union all
13 select 'VT774', 'RIP' from dual union all
14 select 'VT774', 'PAL' from dual union all
15 select 'NT999', 'PAL' from dual
16 /
Tabel is aangemaakt.
SQL> select /* Aalap Sharma */ cod_id||'-'||rn, desc_cod
2 from
3   (
4     select
5       cod_id, desc_cod,
6       row_number() over(partition by cod_id order by cod_id) rn
7     from mytable
8 )
9 /
COD_ID||'-'||RN                                DES
MT001-1                                        PAL
MT001-2                                        PAL
NB112-1                                        RIP
NM332-1                                        RIP
NM332-2                                        RIP
NM332-3                                        RIP
NM332-4                                        RIP
NS007-1                                        PAL
NS007-2                                        TRA
NT999-1                                        PAL
VT774-1                                        PAL
VT774-2                                        RIP
VT774-3                                        PAL
13 rijen zijn geselecteerd.
SQL> select cod_id || '-' || substr(desc_cod,1,1) ||
2         to_char(row_number() over (partition by cod_id,desc_cod order by null),'fm00') cod_id
3       , desc_cod
4    from mytable
5 /
COD_ID     DES
MT001-P01 PAL
MT001-P02 PAL
NB112-R01 RIP
NM332-R01 RIP
NM332-R02 RIP
NM332-R03 RIP
NM332-R04 RIP
NS007-P01 PAL
NS007-T01 TRA
NT999-P01 PAL
VT774-P01 PAL
VT774-P02 PAL
VT774-R01 RIP
13 rijen zijn geselecteerd.Regards,
Rob.

Query with Top N Condition (Result Row)

Hi,
I made a query with an active top n condition. The query has 2 Keyfigures and 1 formula
Gross-sales acutal | Gross-sales previous year | Previous Year %
So that to result line is correct, I had to say "Calculate result as summation" for the keyfigures
gross sales actual and gross sales previous year. That works.
I have the problem with my formula. the formular for previous year % is defined as follows:
gross sales actual %A gross sales previous year
Example Top 3 Customer
                    gross sales actual          gross sales prev. year         prev. year %
Cust 1          100                                   80                                       125 %
Cust 2          90                                     45                                        200 %
Cust 3           80                                    60                                        133 %
Result          270                                   185                                       142.8 % ( 350 * 100 / 245 )
The result of 142 % is the correct result without the condition top 3. with the top 3 condition
the result should be 270 * 100 / 185 = 145.9 %
Additional customer without top 3 condition
Cust 4          50                                       40                                        125 %
Cust 5          30                                        20                                        150 %
It shows the correct result for each single line. The result in the result row is wrong. it is calculated
without taking the active condition. the formular calculates
with the total gross sales actual and the total of gross sales prev. year.
is there any solution the achieve the correct % in the result row?
thanks for your help.
Pascal

Pascal,this is a known behavior with conditions.When you apply condition it just hide the extra rows and it does not impact the result row.So your result row actually shows the value irrespective of the condition you apply.
Now with the help of local functions like calculate result as summation you can show the correct sum after applying the condition but when you try to use that result in some calculation then it takes the original value thereby discarding the calculated value.
Same is happening in your case as well.Its taking the original value i.e 350 and not the calculated sum after condition i.e 270.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
AL

Query combining spatial condition with regular condition works very slow

I had a query like the following. The first part of the condition is a sdo_relate, and others are just regular conditions. If I execute the query with those two condiction separately, they both works very fast, but I combine them together, it's terriblely slow(more than 5 minutes) I tried different combination, and try the /* ordered*/ hint too. Still does not work. Any oracle pro got an idea to optimize the query? Thanks a lot!
select * from MM_ACCOUNT
where SDO_RELATE(GEOLOC,
     (SELECT SDO_AGGR_UNION(MDSYS.SDOAGGRTYPE(geoloc, 5))
     from MM_METRO_FBR_BF
     where ID = 'cyecroi0o1'
     and CREATION_TIME='1026758969052')
     ,'mask=inside querytype=window') = 'TRUE'
and VERTICAL_MKT_SUB_GRP_SIC in ('Retail','Air','Ground','Other','Water','Advertising','Entertainment/Recreation','Other (broadcast etc)','Publishing','Sports / Sports Club''s') and ENTERPRISE_CODE in ('Medium-Large','Medium-Small')
Tim

Hi, Daniel
After I drop the indexes for vertical market, and tried this query you suggested eariler:
select /*+ ordered */ * from
(select /*+ no_merge */
SDO_AGGR_UNION(MDSYS.SDOAGGRTYPE(geoloc, 5)) bufferShape
from MM_METRO_FBR_BF
where ID = 'cyecroi0o1'
and CREATION_TIME='1026758969052') aggr_geom,
MM_ACCOUNT
where SDO_RELATE(GEOLOC, aggr_geom.bufferShape,
'mask=inside querytype=window') = 'TRUE'
and VERTICAL_MKT_SUB_GRP_SIC in ('Retail--Retail','Air--Transportation','Ground--Transportation','Other--Transportation','Water--Transportation','Advertising--Media / Entertainment','Entertainment/Recreation--Media / Entertainment','Other (broadcast etc)--Media / Entertainment','Publishing--Media / Entertainment') and ENTERPRISE_CODE in ('Medium-Large','Medium-Small')
IT DID work significantly faster!!!! Thanks a lot! HOwever, I'm just a little bit confused here, why the index is actually slowing things down instead of making it faster?? And what's the "no_merge" doing here?
Thanks for you great help again!
Tim

Dynamic select query with dynamic where condition

Hi all,
I want to use the dynamic select query with dynamic where condition. For that I used the below code but I am getting dump when using this code.
Please advice, if there is any other way to achieve this requirement.
Thanks,
Sanket Sethi
Code***************
PARAMETERS: p_tabnam      TYPE tabname,
            p_selfl1      TYPE edpline,
            p_value       TYPE edpline,
            p_where1      TYPE edpline .
DATA: lt_where    TYPE TABLE OF edpline,
      lt_sel_list TYPE TABLE OF edpline,
      l_wa_name   TYPE string,
      ls_where    TYPE edpline,
      l_having    TYPE string,
      dref        TYPE REF TO data,
      itab_type   TYPE REF TO cl_abap_tabledescr,
      struct_type TYPE REF TO cl_abap_structdescr,
      elem_type   TYPE REF TO cl_abap_elemdescr,
      comp_tab    TYPE cl_abap_structdescr=>component_table,
      comp_fld    TYPE cl_abap_structdescr=>component.
TYPES: f_count TYPE i.
FIELD-SYMBOLS : <lt_outtab> TYPE ANY TABLE,
*                <ls_outtab> TYPE ANY,
                <l_fld> TYPE ANY.
struct_type ?= cl_abap_typedescr=>describe_by_name( p_tabnam ).
elem_type   ?= cl_abap_elemdescr=>describe_by_name( 'F_COUNT' ).
comp_tab = struct_type->get_components( ).
comp_fld-name = 'F_COUNT'.
comp_fld-type = elem_type.
APPEND comp_fld TO comp_tab.
struct_type = cl_abap_structdescr=>create( comp_tab ).
itab_type   = cl_abap_tabledescr=>create( struct_type ).
l_wa_name = 'l_WA'.
CREATE DATA dref TYPE HANDLE itab_type.
ASSIGN dref->* TO <lt_outtab>.
*CREATE DATA dref TYPE HANDLE struct_type.
*ASSIGN dref->* TO <ls_outtab>.
* Creation of the selection fields
APPEND p_selfl1 TO lt_sel_list.
APPEND 'COUNT(*) AS F_COUNT' TO lt_sel_list.
** Creation of the "where" clause
*CONCATENATE p_selfl1 '= '' p_value ''.'
*            INTO ls_where
*            SEPARATED BY space.
*APPEND ls_where TO lt_where.
* Creation of the "where" clause
APPEND p_where1 TO lt_where.
* Creation of the "having" clause
l_having = 'count(*) >= 1'.
* THE dynamic select
SELECT          (lt_sel_list)
       FROM     (p_tabnam)
       INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <lt_outtab>.
*       WHERE    (lt_where).

Hi Sanket,
The above given logic of mine works for you, put the code in the If condition and try-
just like below:
IF NOT P_EBELN IS INITIAL.
lt_where = '& = ''&'' '.
REPLACE '&' WITH p_ebeln INTO lt_where.
REPLACE '&' WITH field_value INTO lt_where.
SELECT (lt_sel_list) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <lt_outtab>
FROM (p_tabnam)
WHERE (lt_where).
ENDIF.
thanks\
Mahesh

Sql query with conditions and calculations???

Hi,
how I can build a query with conditions and calculations?
E.g. I've got this table
Start          | End     |     Working Place     |     Mandatory
01-JAN-13 | 11-JAN-13 |     Office           |          1
14-JAN-13 | 25-JAN-13 |     Home Office      |     0
04-MRZ-13| 15-MRZ-13 |     Office           |          0
11-FEB-13 | 22-FEB-13 |     Office           |          1
Now if column working place=Office and column mandatory=0
the new column "price" has to calculate: (End-Start)* $25.00
and if working place=Office and column mandatory=1
the "price" column has to calculate: (End-Start)* $20.60
else $0.00
I tried it with the case statement but I didn't know how
to calculate my values and display it to the virtual column "price".
Something like
case
when Working_Place = 'Office' and Mandatory=1
     then ...
else '0.00'
end as PRICE
Or is it not possible?
Edited by: DB2000 on 12.03.2013 05:09

Use CASE:
select start_dt,
        end_dt,
        working_place,
        mandatory,
        case
          when working_place = 'Office' and mandatory = 0 then (end_dt - start_dt) * 25
          when working_place = 'Office' and mandatory = 1 then (end_dt - start_dt) * 20.60
          else 0
        end price
from tbl
START_DT END_DT    WORKING_PLA MANDATORY      PRICE
01-JAN-13 11-JAN-13 Office               1        206
14-JAN-13 25-JAN-13 Home Office          0          0
04-MAR-13 15-MAR-13 Office               0        275
11-FEB-13 22-FEB-13 Office               1      226.6
SQL> SY.

Performance of APD with source as 'Query with conditions'

Hi,
I have a question regarding the performance of an APD query with conditions when it is run in the background.
I have an infocube with 80 million records.I have a query to find Top 15 (Condition In query) Customers per territory.
With the help of an APD Query (Source) i wanted to populate the details (customer category , etc) of the Top 15 Customers into a DSO (Target)
Right now it takes 6 minutes to run the query in web.
I wanted to know how feasible it is to use an APD (run in backgrnd) to dump the results of the BEx query (which has conditions Top 15) into DSO.
Also , what other options do i have ?
Appreciate your answers.
Regards

Thomas thanks for the response. I have checked the file on the app server and found that the lines with more than 512 characters are being truncated after 512 characters. Basis team is not aware of any such limits on the app server. I am sure few on the forum would have extracted data to a file on the application server using APD. Please note that the file extraction to the client workstation is working as expected (posts lines more than 512 characters).

Query with additional condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for