Questions on MCX Policies for Laptop/Mobile Users:

Questions on MCX Policies for Laptop/Mobile Users:
I have several managed Macs running Leopard. Many of them are MacBook laptops. My main MCX policies involve mapping printers and mounting network volumes at login. These are simple computer and group policies to help make the users life a little easier when it comes to finding and using network resources such as file server volumes and network printers.
Since most of my users are laptops, they are expressing 2 major concerns involving their laptops when they are off the LAN (i.e.; on the road at a cafe, working at home, staying at a hotel or when they have no network at all)
1) When users are off our LAN, the Mac still tries to mount the network volumes in their OD/MCX login items when the user logs in (with cached mobile credentials). Can this be avoided? Windows PCs do not do this. If the PC laptop cant find an AD DC, they simply don't run the login scripts and thus dont try to mount/map network volumes. How can I make the Mac laptops only mount network volumes when they are on the LAN?
2) Most Mac users have a Cisco VPN client, and use it regularly to connect to the company's LAN from home, hotels etc. Of course when they log into the network via VPN, their network volumes are not mounted automatically. Is their a way to re-run the MCX managed login items script once they connect to the VPN and mount (i.e.; "map") their network drives? Sure, users can simple use the "Connect To Server" option in the FInder (or perhaps try and use the god-awful Leopard Finder side bar discovery browser thingy which I hate - never mind), but I need a consistent automated way to mount volumes quickly and easily for my mobile users. There must be a way to run (or re-run) the login items part of my MCX policies.

Ping!
I'm looking for this functionality too. Anyone have a solution to either of these? One that came to mind is to wrap the login items in a script which detects if the LAN is available.

Similar Messages

  • Is the Lumia 1020 available for T-mobile users

    I currently have t-mobile for my provider but am very interested in the 1020 phone for business use, but it only seems to be available on AT&T.  Will this phone be available for T-mobile users soon?  and if not why?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    thanks for the info.  It seems to me these companies would realize that they only kill their sales by limiting items to a particular carrier.  By the time this phone becomes available to everyone else there will be a newer, better one waiting to take its place... Whoever is in charge of marketing should be fired.. ha  but again thanks for the info... 

  • Forums.ni.​com site designed for the mobile user

    Isn't it time there was a mobile site designed for the mobile device user wanting to catch up on discussions. While you can view the site on mobile devices, navigating around can be quite a chore. With the normal site there is too much information on the screen at any one time and having to zoom in and scroll about from left to right to read a message is a bit of a headache.
    Regards
    Ray Farmer

    "Mobile optimized" sites will probably soon be a thing of the past. They were made to avoid problems with ultra tiny screens and very slow connections (remember GPRS?).
    A typical mobile device now runs on 3G or even 4D and the screens are sometimes 800x640 or higher.
    My android G1 phone is over 2 years old, and I still typically prefer the full site. I'll probably upgrade in a few weeks and will at least double the screen resolution. I'll stick with the regular site.
    (One problem is the placement of the new kudos gadgets. It is impossible to see them at the same time with the post author, thus creating significant confusion to figure out what belongs to where ... ).
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • Questions in setting up Security group policies for Lync 2013 Users

    Hi Team,
    One of our customer looking for the below requirements:
    ü 
    B>>> Being able to split users in to groups. Would like to be able to split in to Departmental groups, the groups will be Service Delivery, Finance, Business Development, Clinical Services, Radiologists,
    SLA Team, Call Handlers.
    ü 
    B>>> Being able to control which users are able to contact or see other users. For example Limit Radiologists to only be able to see Service Delivery and Call Handlers
    We know that RBAC policies can be used by Administrator or Technicians who works remotely. However, a user sitting at a server running Lync Server is not restricted by RBAC.
    Question:
    Is there a way we can fulfill the above customer requirements in Lync 2013 environment?

    Hi,
    On Lync Server side, what you can do is to change the AD attribute msRTCSIP-GroupingID. You can set different value for different groups. Then each group will not able to search the users in other groups with user name. However, they can still search the
    users in other groups with the sip address.
    More details:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jcalev/archive/2012/06/07/partitioning-lync-address-book-using-msrtcsip-groupingid.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Eason Huang
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
    Eason Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Customer Service request for all mobile users

    To all cellular subscribers, first off, I wish to say I am a proud VZW user. Second, I want to say I am a customer service rep for a competitor carrier. Personally, a few of my coworkers and I believe there really isn't any competition. Thirdly, I want to remind everyone... When you get your bills and you don't understand them, or your service isn't working correctly, try to have your duckies in a row BEFORE you call customer service. We do not work for the company in question, we are a 3rd party outfit that is hired by the big guys (T-Mo, ATT, Sprint, Verizon....) to handle the calls coming in. We are trained, but remember, we are in a call center, some may be overseas, some may be in the US, but our paychecks do not come from the big guys, but our real bosses. Yes, you are customers, just like I am, but before you call us, put yourself in our place. Seriously, if you had to talk to a person over the phone who is yelling and calling you names, would you want to help them?
    So, my request to you is follow the Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have others do unto you. Trust me, staying calm in the face of any hardship will go farther than flying off the handle.

    Yes, my coworker's sister works for the same company we work for  and she handles VZW calls. Also, just the other day, I helped someone cancel her contract with the competitor's company because she was just hired on as a rep with the same company we work for but in a different state. BTW, that new VZW customer/CSR says that the service for Verizon is WAY BETTER than with her old company 

  • Group Policies for OS X users

    Hey folks,
    I'm trying to determine approprate GPO settings for some computer-based OS X accounts. I have a computer in the bedroom and one in the kitchen that both auto-login as special domain accounts. One is something like kuser (for kitchen) and the other is buser (for bedroom). They are domain users b/c they need access to my photo library and itunes library (both shares on a 2003 member server).
    Since printing in a domain enviroment pretty much requires storing the user/pass in the SMB URL and that is stored in plain text, I want to make sure these users have VERY limited access in the domain. I want to prevent login to anything other than the two special computers. However the AD "log onto" setting doesnt seem to effect OS X.
    So, are there GPOs that will have ANY effect? Obvisouly the windows specific settings will have no effect, but can anyone recomend what I need to do to secure the domain against someone trying to use these special users?
    Thanks!
    -N

    I'm very confused by what you're trying to accomplish, but you don't necessarily need a GPO to grant or restrict access to resources. You'll use permisssions on computer objects in the Active Directory Users & Computers console.
    For example, if you don't want a particular domain account to use a particular computer, you can simply deny access to that user in that computer object.
    If I'm missing your point, can you please clarify what you're after?
    bill
    1 GHz Powerbook G4   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

  • How to prevent Evaluate User Policies to run for Bulk loaded users?

    Hi,
    I have an OIM 11G R2 environment, where i did a bulk load of abount 200,000+ users, and all the users' accounts were created using target recon.
    How do I prevent the evaluate user policies scheduler from running for these users?
    Any ideas are welcome.
    Thanks,
    Aravind Suresh

    Hi,
    I do have roles and access policies.
    But i do not want them to applied to them at this stage as they already got everything through target recon.
    Only for new users or these users on update i want the evaluate user policies to run.
    Otherwise running evaluate user policies for these many users could be a very time and resource consuming task.
    Thanks,
    Aravind Suresh

  • I want to enforce MCX computer policies, but all my users are admins...

    Hi Jim
    I have an interesting situation that maybe you have dealt with in the past. Maybe I can pick your brain. I am very familiar with Mac OS X, but new to MCX and OD.
    I am deploying ~200-400 Macs in Q1 08. All of them will be Intel iMacs running 10.5.x (Leopard). I am going to be running both AD (for authentication/authorization) and OD (for MCX). My OD servers will be running Leopard Server (Xserves)
    I want to manage all of the Mac computers via MCX. One gotcha: My CIO has insisted that all the Mac users will be administrators. Rather than trying to manually set each user up as a local admin, I have created a AD group called "Mac Power Users" and each user that gets a Macintosh system will be in this group. My master Netinstall Mac image is set to acknowledge the AD "Mac Power Users" group as a valid admin group via the Directory Utility, and thus any Mac bound to AD will see the Mac AD effectively users as administrators. Dont ask why I have to do this - its a political issue and even our current 400 Windows XP desktops are setup like this too. Grrr.
    Anyway - I want to manage basic settings via OD/MCX like automounts, Web proxies, loginwindow settings & maybe printers too. Mostly computer based policies, not much user or group level policies will be needed (I hope)
    Question: If all my users are considered local admins based on the AD "Mac Power Users" group, will they override my OD/MCX policies? If so, is there any way to allow them to be admins but still enforce computer policies via MCX?
    Its the chicken and the egg!
    TIA

    Hi
    If I understand you correctly then you should be able to do this using computer lists. Don’t be tempted to use or delete the default ones already there, create a new one instead and add all of your clients to that list. You can use the diaresis (3 dots) button to discover all of your clients (they have to be turned on and have unique names eg: iMac01, iMac02 etc). Its actually better if you manually add the clients to the list by collating all the MAC addresses. Although if you use the Server’s DHCP Service then you can generally get away without doing this. You should also disable automatic logins.
    Apply managed preferences from there.
    Managed preferences applied to computer lits are applied to the hardware and as such it will not matter whether network or local users are admins or not. You’ll also notice that there are a few extra settings that can be managed at computer level that are not available in either Users or Groups. Login Window and Energy Saver settings for example. The order in which MCX are applied are Users, Computer Lists and Groups. Managed preferences are also accumulative.
    Tony

  • Upgrade question for laptop to run PPro CS6/CC

    All,
    I've spent the last several days reading, researching and generally getting up to speed on what my options are re hardware moving forward, and though I've been a lurker/user of these forums (and others) for years, this is my first time engaging directly now that I feel I know a bit more. I must also say how incredible a resource the regular users like Harm Millard have been to self-taught but enthusiastic newbies like me - thank you!
    I've been a longtime self-taught, relatively light but still barely pro Premiere Pro user for the past ten years. For the past couple of years, I've been barely getting by using CS4 on my once-top-of-the-line Dell Precision M6500 laptop running Win7 Pro 32-bit. The M6500 is by far my favorite PC I've ever owned and is still rocking, even with older specs (listed below), but it is time to grow up, bite the bullet and (hopefully) upgrade this machine so that I can take advantage of CS6/CC and do a bit more heavy lifting (basic color correction, light After Effects, etc).
    I currently shoot on a Sony AX2000 in AVCHD, but am starting to do more work on my Canon t3i and am close to moving up to a Canon 5D mk3, so will be using more HD MOV files in the near future, possibly alongside the old AVCHD footage. Most of my exports are for HD web uploads, but also occasionally export to DVD. I do not anticipate stepping up to Red footage or the like in the near or mid future.
    My current laptop specs are as follows:
    Win7 32-bit
    4GB RAM
    Intel i7 quad core M620 (2.67GHz)
    500GB 7200rpm HDD
    Nvidia Quadro FX 2800M
    I've already ordered a RAM upgrade to get me to 16GB, have Win7 64-bit ready to install, and just bought 2 x 750GB 7200rpm HDD (Western Digital). Instead of investing in an all new machine (laptop or desktop), and considering the amazing stability and longevity (so far) of the M6500, I'd like to try and see if I can get this machine to a place where I can take advantage of CS6/CC and have it run stably and somewhat fast. I realize it's not the best option, and that getting an all-new tricked out desktop is the preferred option, but for budget reasons, that's not possible right now.
    Here's my plan:
    Upgrade so that system will be:
    Win7 64bit
    16 GB RAM
    2 x 750GB 7200rpm HDDs (internal)
    rest of the system listed above would remain the same as above - namely CPU and graphics card
    The machine can also support a mSATA mini SSD (up to 256GB), but I haven't splurged for that yet. I'm  trying to figure out whether to use the two new HDDs in RAID 0 and have the OS, project files, cache, source footage and export files all on those two RAIDed drives, or whether it would make a truly huge difference to add another internal SSD as the boot/OS/Program Files drive and leave the RAID 0 configuration to handle all video and project files. I've read enough to assume that adding the SSD is the preferred option, but it's pricey, and what I'm trying to determine is whether or not it's really worth the cost vs a straight 2-HDD RAID 0 configuration.
    I've read a lot about the dangers of RAID 0, but am not too concerned about failures since I use an online backup system (Sugarsync) for all my document files (this machine doubles as my main work PC) and I regularly back up all source and exported video files.
    On a separate note, I realize that my graphics card is not listed among the supported cards for CS6/CC - is that going to cause stability and/or significant performance issues, or will it work since I won't be doing 4k/Red files? Is the CUDA hack an option for me? I have the option of upgrading the card to a supported card (Nividia M5000), but it's hugely pricey (close to $2k) and unless it will make the machine an absolute stud for years to come, it's not worth it.
    So in short (yeah right ), here are my questions:
    Does my proposed new system have the juice to handle what I want to do?
    Which HDD setup is preferred, and by what degree (do I absolutely have to get the SSD to make this work?):
    2 x 750GB 7200rpm HDDs in RAID 0 for the entire machine
    1 x SSD (what size is minimum recommended?) as boot/OS plus 2x750GB HDDs in RAID 0
    Will my existing Quadro 2800M graphics card make the other RAM/HDD upgrades a waste of money?
    Is my existing CPU powerful enough to warrant these other upgrades?
    Sorry for the long post, and thanks for any help you guys can provide!
    Van

    Van,
    Tough love - I'm going to give you my honest opinion here, but it does make me feel bad since you seem to have already ordered parts before you posted.
    1. In a word no. Your processor is dual core. You really want at least quad core + hyperthreading for the media that you will be pushing around. The Quadro 2800M only has 96 CUDA cores and DDR3 (slow) memory. BTW, task manager shows 4 "cores" when you have a dual-core + hyperthreading.
    2. I'd choose 2. - much nicer - worth the cost
    3. yes
    4. no
    So what to do if you cut bait on your current plan and get a new laptop. Check out recent (< 6 mths old) threads here for lots of discussion at various price points. Gamers laptops and Sager/Clevo models definitely offer the best bang for the buck for laptops to run Premiere, mostly due to the GTX video line trouncing the Quadro line for performance for the price. I loved the Dell M6500 in its time. If you want to replace it with something current day the M6700 is good, but I like what HP is doing for the 17" workstation class even better in 2013. If you can buy a few months, I suspect the new smaller die size 22nm Intel cpus will be really help for laptop performance (desktops have just about all the cpu cooling capacity required, but in laptops cooling through tiny tiny coolers and tiny, tiny, quiet fans is way limited - so, the new lower wattage, cooler 22nm cpus should be much larger boost for laptop users than workstations).
    I suspect that I would really enjoy editing on a well thought out $1500 Asus, even better on a $2200 Sager, and would have similar performance with the support of HP or Dell at closer to a $3000 price point for the media you mention above. ADK sells Sager/Clevo laptops and has much better support for video (and audio) editors than HP or Dell ever dreamed to provide; prices would be a bit more than www Sager dealers but ADK is a no-brainer if you want "real" support and a machine that is tweaked for Adobe.
    Regards,
    Jim

  • 10.3.9 - Mobile Users Authenticating for SMTP Relay.

    I hope I get my thoughts together and this question comes out right.
    I have a small shop, where most of my users are in-house. They're using Entourage clients, and my couple of PC folks are using Outlook 2003. From in-house, everyone works just fine. Relay filters are setup to allow people inside the network to send fine. I have 127.0.0.1/32 and 192.168.1.1/32 in the Mail/Settings/Filters/SMTP Relay settings.
    However, I have a couple of mobile users, the Director being one of them, who want/need to send email when outside of the office, or from a mobile device, like their Treo.
    What I'm running into is that my mobile users are having authentication issues when trying to send email while outside the office. Even when they indicate they need to authenticate SMTP from their client, I get different issues with different users.
    The Director's Treo, using Versamail, recieves email normally via IMAP. However, when sending, even though she's set to ESMTP Authentication, I get a 502 error. Without ESMTP Authentication turned on, I get a relay error.
    Mail/Settings/Advanced has LOGIN and Plain checked for SMTP Authentication, and IMAP has LOGIN, Plain and Clear checked, while POP has APOP and Clear slected.
    I'm at a loss for how to proceed with correcting this issue to allow mobile users to authenticate reliably from where ever they are. Can someone provide me some straightforward guidence on how this should be correctly configured?
    Thanks.
    PowerBook G4 17   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   1.5G RAM

    Thanks for the response.
    I've seen the posts about adding alternate ports, but it doesn't seem to matter what the ISP source is, they get Relay denied messages and our mailer shows the denial traffic.
    There are additional relay exceptions in this, but here is the postconf file you requested:
    always_bcc =
    command_directory = /usr/sbin
    config_directory = /etc/postfix
    daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
    debugpeerlevel = 2
    enableserveroptions = yes
    inet_interfaces = all
    luser_relay =
    mail_owner = postfix
    mailbox_transport = cyrus
    mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq
    manpage_directory = /usr/share/man
    mapsrbldomains = sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,bl.spamcop.net
    messagesizelimit = 15728640
    mydestination = $myhostname,localhost.$mydomain,kemperart.org
    mydomain_fallback = localhost
    myhostname = mail.kemperart.org
    mynetworks = 127.0.0.1/32,192.168.200.99/32,192.168.200.1/32,rr.com,68.25.136.123/32
    mynetworks_style = host
    newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases
    queue_directory = /private/var/spool/postfix
    readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix
    relayhost =
    sample_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix/examples
    sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail
    setgid_group = postdrop
    smtpdclientrestrictions = rejectmapsrbl
    smtpdenforcetls = no
    smtpdpw_server_securityoptions = plain,login,cram-md5
    smtpdrecipientrestrictions = permitsasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks,reject_unauthdestination,permit
    smtpdsasl_authenable = yes
    smtpdtls_certfile = /etc/postfix/server.pem
    smtpdtlsloglevel = 0
    smtpduse_pwserver = yes
    smtpdusetls = no
    unknownlocal_recipient_rejectcode = 450
    Remember, be gentle, while I'm able to get around the Terminal Window, I am, by no means, an expert.
    Thanks again!
    PowerBook G4 17   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   1.5G RAM

  • Advice for Mobile Users

    This is my first time setting up SL Server, and I'm not sure the best way to proceed. I have a small workgroup of <25 client Macs for an elementary school. Each teacher will have a MacBook, there will be an iMac in each classroom, and a smattering of a few other iMacs and MacBook Pros. Every staff member needs an account, and then there will be a couple general-purpose accounts (a "student" account, etc.). For the per-person accounts, I'm thinking of using Mobile User accounts with Home sync so that if a teacher has to log into an iMac or another MacBook rather than her own, all of her files will be there. Along with using NetRestore for a few restore images, I think this would eliminate the need to run client backups over Time Machine service (I will of course need to backup these home sync stores).
    Is there another way I should be considering to set this up? The portables will be off campus regularly (possibly every night), so Network Homes won't work. I'm not full-time support — just a parent volunteer — so I want it to be easy for on-site staff to minimize uptime. I plan on training the administrative assistant so she can issue a teacher a replacement MacBook or help them log into the classroom iMac and then re-image the problematic machine if it's having some sort of trouble. I have one Mac mini server running the entire show. The wired network is all Gigabit, and all the AirPort hardware is the newest stuff, so wireless clients are all running N. I don't want to trust any of these users to know how to back up their files, but I also don't want to overtax the network or the one server.
    I know I'm asking more than one simple question, so if anyone rather than answer has links or suggestions of good resources I can read (printed or online) to help make this decision, that would be most helpful as well.

    There is a simple, but limited way to do this presently. Just export the xmp data. If they're RAWs, you'll get side cars, otherwise it will be embedded.
    When you copy the images to the RAID, copy the sidecars too and then import on the other system.
    The limitations are, you don't get:
    - History states
    - History snapshots
    - Stacks
    - Collections
    - Flags

  • 10.5.5 Active directory problem for mobile users

    I an running 10.5.5 on a MBP 2.4. The computer is attached to Active Directory for authentication. The accounted is setup as a mobile user with automatic home sync. Below is the problem I'm experiencing after 10.5.5.
    Upgrade worked fine, everything went through as expected. When I got home with computer, couldn't login. I did eventually get logged in, computer became extremely unresponsive at intermittent times.
    At work next day, everything worked fine.
    I believe this is a problem with 10.5.5 computers that are bound to AD, when AD is not available (but internet is.) Some type of weird priority locking or timeout setting? It seems to fail immediately if no network is available, but if the internet is available it is like it gets "hung" waiting for a response.
    Anybody else having similar problems?
    Below are the details on the specific tests that brought me to this conclusion.
    1) Boot with work network cable connected - Works fine
    2) Boot with work wifi network enabled - works fine
    3) Boot with public wifi network enabled and work cable - works fine.
    4) Boot with only public wifi - appears "frozen" (turned off after 5 minutes of trying to login)
    5) Boot without network or wifi - works fine using cached mobile account info
    6) Boot with network cable and public wifi, remove network cable after login- works fine for a period becomes periodically frozen. attempts to do anything become queued, when computer starts responding queue emptys out (can see menus / applications switch around to correspond with clicks.)
    7) Change account to Manual sync of mobile account, again boot with network cable and public wifi, remove network cable- no freezing responds normaly.
    All steps repeated after rebinding computer to AD - same results.

    First rule of installing an upgrade, run permissions repair both before & after. Did you do that?
    I'm using a Mac dual bound to AD & OD, works perfectly. I can't speak for the exact setup of your network but I personally would be suspicious of AD. I had a similar issue some time back where my processor would go crazy with the net directory authentication running like crazy. Turned out AD had somehow forgotten my computer. It only happened away from work where my Mac couldn't contact the AD server (not exactly sure why). I'd try the following.
    1. While at work create a local administrative account on your Mac (you should always have a backup account anyway).
    2. Login as local admin account.
    3. open Directory Utility from the Applications/Utilities folder & remove the AD server (you'll need an account that can bind machines to AD).
    4. re-add your Mac to AD.
    This may resolve your issue & shouldn't hurt anything in the least.

  • I connected my iphone 4s that i unlocked for t-mobile. I plugged it into itunes, and it asked me to update to ios6. I accepted the download and update button. it told me it needed 8 hours. i closed my laptop. not shut down. i opened and it wants restorin?

    I connected my iphone 4s that I unlocked for t-mobile. I plugged it into itunes, and it asked me to update to ios6. I accepted the download and update button. It told me it needed 8 hours. I closed my laptop, not shut down. I re-opened the laptop a few hours later, and it wants restoring?? Whats going on?! i want my iphone back! PLEASE HELP. I'M LOST!!! (I synced my iphone to my computer if that helps at all).

    Yes, and, I try to restore. I have the T-Mobile sim card in it just to clarify. It will not let me get passed that, it does not accept the t-mobile sim card. i tried restoring it using wifi, cellular, and i cant get i tunes. I am scared that if i take the tmobile sim card out and put the at&t one in just to complete the restoration process that the iphone will lock again and not read the tmobile sim card, then all my hard work has gone for nothing. ( this whole process was caused by me trying wanting to empty my pictures onto my computer because i did not have any storage space left). <--- that may not be as important, but i included it just because.

  • Hi ,How can I get a list of all laptops or users with folder direction enabled or offline files enabled, be it sccm or poerwshell . i have struggled for a week.

    Hi ,how can I get a list of all laptops or users with folder direction enabled or offline files enabled, be it sccm
    or poerwshell . i have struggled for a week
    tchocr

    Hi,
    There is no such PowerShell command can achiev this. Maybe you can use a script to get the user name with folder redirection enabled. However, I am not familiar with writing script, and it would be better for you to ask in script forum below for professional
    assistance:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=ITCG&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc
    Best Regards,
    Mandy
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

  • How can I get a list of all laptops or users with folder direction enabled or offline files enabled, be it sccm or poerwshell . i have struggled for a week.

    How can I get a list of all laptops or users with folder direction enabled or offline files enabled, be it sccm or poerwshell . i have struggled for a week.

    Hi,
    There is no such PowerShell command can achiev this. Maybe you can use a script to get the user name with folder redirection enabled. However, I am not familiar with writing script, and it would be better for you to ask in script forum below for professional
    assistance:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=ITCG&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc
    Best Regards,
    Mandy
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Maybe you are looking for