Reg Slow Database

Hi,
Our Database Suddenly become slow in the recent days.
The Same concurrent report which completes in seconds takes hours to complete.
We gone through the awr report and found
Top 5 Timed Events
Event               Waits          Time(s)          Avg Wait(ms)     % Total Call Time     Wait Class
CPU time                         271,488                    38.2     
db file sequential read          1,544,634,048     176,828          0          24.9               User I/O
read by other session          61,394,625     164,873          3          23.2               User I/O
latch: cache buffers chains     1,728,716     62,659          36          8.8               Concurrency
db file scattered read          2,327,370     11,683          5          1.6               User I/O
Your thoughts on it.
Where else in AWR report i have to consider.
Regards
Krishna

When you post a question
- always include a four digit version
- always include platform information
- for this kind of question: the amount of memory in the server
- assuming Unix: vmstat output
- basic spfile parameters
In a normal database it would be very strange db sequential read not to show up in the top 5.
In conjunction with cache buffer chains it seems to indicate you didn't tune sql, and you tried to resolve your performance problems by increasing the SGA.
This never works.
Quoting William Jefferson Clinton, when he defeated George Bush sr: 'It's the application, stupid!'
Right now you did no analysis, and also posted unformatted output, not using the tag.
Much more information is required.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Similar Messages

  • Slow database access across network

    I have a postgresql database setup on a server machine and have written a java program in netbeans that accesses it. The problem i have is that running the jar created by netbeans from any other machine on the network has really slow database access but running the program from netbeans itself is fine. Running the jar on the server machine is also fine.
    Anyoner got any idea as to why this could be?
    Tom

    I don't know if this will help, I'm just wading into writing my own java apps to hit a SQL 2K db. We purchased a SQL2k/JSP driven backend on which we extended their OM to meet our needs. It was build as an extranet product but ran very poorly across the 'Net.
    The biggest annoyance was not the actual transaction time of the app but the time it took from the end user to click a button and the start of the transaction.
    After much testing I determined it was the JSP.
    So what we have done to alieviate the issue is to have multiple regional Tomcats that 'throw' their transactions to a central colocation where the SQL servers sit (so the tomcats do the JSP managment in a sense locally to the end user) . For big clients we actually place a linux/tomcat box at the edge of their firewall. For whatever reason, I'm far too busy to determine the how now that I get the responses I need, this has completely eradicated the annoying pause between user interaction and the actual transaction to the DB server. Extended testing showed the SQL server running in the sub half second range to process a command but the tomcat rendering could take up to 2 to 5 seconds in worst case for no discernable reason. Moving the tomcat frontends to the network segment where the clients we solved it.
    Of course I'm digging into swing now too and it has some slowness that the Eclipse zealots say SWT fixes but I haven't the depth or experience to properly judge the camps arguments yet.
    hth...

  • Sql queries - slow database

    hi all,
    is there a general but specific way to generate a list of sql queries that are consuming most resources and resulting in slow database performance?
    thanks.

    There are very few ways in this world that are "general but specific".
    You can use "general" tools like StatsPack and AWR.
    You can write "general" queries on V$SQL, V$SQLAREA, V$SQLSTATS.
    You can use "specific" methods like Tracing.
    You can use "specific" methods like Client side (or Application Server side) Logs.

  • Slow database access in Vista.

    Hi,
    I'm having a little problem with accessing a database here at work, and it started to happen just recently. I'm using Windows Vista and the access to the database is extremely slow, take about 10 seconds just to show all the tables and it takes like 15 minutes to show a table containing about 100 rows.
    The funny part is that is no such problem using Windows XP! I'm using the oracle client 10g Release 2 (10.2) for Microsoft Windows (32-Bit).
    Have anyone experienced something similiar or know the problem to the cause?
    Thanks in advance,
    Joakim Rosendahl.

    Hi,
    I have the same issue on my Vista Notebook. (with Oracle Instant Client for Vista)
    as a short sql, select ool.line_id, ol.* from oe_order_lines_all ool where ool.line_id = 123456;
    (1) This got hung while I connected an DB(port=1521), while I have another Cloned DB(port=1541) runs normally.
    (2) when I comment out the "ol.*", it runs normally.
    (these above two looks kinky with Toad 9)
    (3)Same SQL runs well via SQL Plus, even with ol.*.
    (4) Same SQL runs well in my XP machine, so I guess it should be the problem on my Vista notebook.
    So, Madrid, since you mentioned the "Bottleneck", I am pretting interested in how I can check in my OS Leve ??? It will be greatly appreciated that you could give me any advise.
    Or, if I got wrong area to discuss this issue, please correct me, then.
    Thanks,
    Jay

  • Statspack for slow database

    Guys,
    This is my first time i generated a statspack report as the users were complaining slow response from datbase.
    This report is taken when the reports that takes a long time were run.
    This is my statspack report.
    Message was edited by:
    jkestely

    Hi,
    FYI, some tuning guru's are developing an open source free tool to help analyze STATSPACK and AWR reports, which is helpful to beginners:
    http://www.statspackanalyzer.com
    Also, It may be be a good idea to publish your prouction SQL here (or anywhere else). I've seen DBA's get canned for disclosing proprietary details about their employers database . . . .
    Also, a short duration snapshot is not so bad, and I often do on minute snaps when diagnosing a system. Anyhow, here are some observations from SP analyzer:
    Hope this helps. . . .
    Donald K. Burleson
    Author of "Oracle 9i High Performance Tuning with STATSPACK" by Oracle Press
    You have enabled system-level parallel query. This can influence the cost-based optimizer to favor full-table scans over index access. Consider using parallel hints instead, or invoking parallelism at the session level.
    You may have an application issue causing excessive rollbacks with 47.62% rollbacks per transaction. Due to Oracle´s assumption of a commit, the rollback process is very expensive and should only be used when necessary. You can identify the specific SQL and user session that is executing the rollbacks by querying the v$sesstat view.
    Remember that some applications may automatically perform rollback operations (commit-then-rollback or rollback-then-exit) after each commit. If this is the case, speak with your application developers to find out if there is a way to disable this. While these "empty rollbacks" do not incur performance expense, it will case this metric to appear very high.
    You have high latch free waits of 1.3 per transaction. The latch free wait occurs when the process is waiting for a latch held by another process. Check the later section for the specific latch waits. Latch free waits are usually due to SQL without bind variables, but buffer chains and redo generation can also cause them.
    You have 27,717.0 consistent gets examination per second. "Consistent gets - examination" is different than regular consistent gets. It is used to read undo blocks for consistent read purposes, but also for the first part of an index read and hash cluster I/O.
    You have 203,044 table fetch continued row actions during this period. Migrated/chained rows always cause double the I/O for a row fetch and "table fetch continued row" (chained row fetch) happens when we fetch BLOB/CLOB columns (if the avg_row_len > db_block_size), when we have tables with > 255 columns, and when PCTFREE is too small. You may need to reorganize the affected tables with the dbms_redefintion utility and re-set your PCTFREE parameters to prevent future row chaining.
    You have 1.1 long table full-table scans per second. This might indicate missing indexes, and you can run plan9i.sql to identify the specific tables and investigate the SQL to see if an index scan might result in faster execution. If your large table full table scans are legitimate, look at optimizing your db_file_multiblock_read_count parameter.
    You have high small table full-table scans, at 1.7 per second. Verify that your KEEP pool is sized properly to cache frequently referenced tables and indexes.
    You are not using your KEEP pool to cache frequently referenced tables and indexes. This may cause unnecessary I/O. When configured properly, the KEEP pool guarantees full caching of popular tables and indexes. Remember, an average buffer get is often 100 times faster than a disk read.
    Any table or index that consumes > 10% of the data buffer, or tables & indexes that have > 50% of their blocks residing in the data buffer should be cached into the KEEP pool. You can fully automate this process using scripts.

  • Reg: Standby Database

    Hello,
    In StandBy database,
    Is it necessary to cancel the MANAGED RECOVERY MODE before performing the SHUTDOWN immediate option. IF yes WHY
    or
    instead of cancelling can i directly issue the SHUTDOWN IMMEDIATE; command
    Thanks,
    Sunil

    Close this thread as it is already answered here: Reg: Standby Database

  • Slow database

    Hi,
    Suppose if the user reports slowness in the database in a production environment what are all the things which we have to look over and check.please explain me .what are all the dynamic performance views which we have to check .please give me a note of it.iam using 10.2.0.4 database .please say me
    Thanks and Regards
    Aram

    aram wrote:
    Suppose if the user reports slowness in the database in a production environment what are all the things which we have to look over....Nothing really. You tell the user that he/she is mistaken. Their PCs/network/client/mouse/keyboard/monitor/memory stick/dvd writer/whatever is actually slow. Then you go back to drinking coffee and reading Dilbert.
    And this is not intended just to be a flippant remark. What if you spend the next 8 hours trying to find the problem in the database, when there's a network routing problem that is the cause? How do you justify wasting your time, that the company pays you for, chasing after performance phantoms? You just as well could have been drinking coffee and reading Dilbert (less stressful anyway).
    An observation that something seems slow is not a problem definition. You need to make that user jump through diagnostic hoops on his/her side in order to isolate the so-called performance issue. It can be a lot of things - of which the database is merely one such factor.

  • Slow database/schema - network OK

    We have an arrangement at a users site that has an IIS web server connected to an Oracle database Schema. The ping (<1ms) and trace route between them are very healthy. The web server is OK too. Yet when the server reads and writes data to the database the process is very slow.
    We’ve even taken the web server out of the equation and got the DBA to run a small script that inserts and deletes data and captures some timings. The result is the read and write (Select, update and delete) take at least 200% longer than in most other environments we ran the same test in. All in all the bottle neck is the Oracle 9 server.
    The database server itself is supposed to be very powerful. Any suggestions?

    I don't think there is anything wrong with the Actual SQL of the application, under normal circumstances it is quite efficient, we have it running on several servers with no problems. The test script was devised to prove it wasn't the SQL of the application or the application server itself. It creates a table with two columns and using loops inserts, updates and deletes the data. The test table is index on the ID column.
    In using this test script on other servers the time it took to complete the operations was very quick except for this one Oracle 9 server. We understand the server is hosting serveral Oracle databases each containing several users and schemas also in the afternoons the time the operation takes can be even longer pointing towards some sort of load management issue.

  • Slow Database Response

    Dear All,
    I am looking if any one can advise me how to test database why it is slow? I have production database 9i under Windows 2003 Server 32-bit. Application front-end has become slower as each time it reads database. Database response is slower. Could any one let me know how to test and make sure database is slower and what possible steps should be taken to make database faster. Re-building indexes is also a possible option.
    Can any one please let me know indetail?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    What about the server, is it loaded ? Is the CPU loaded, is there enough RAM and/or SWAP ?
    Recently we had the same problem with customer with Oracle10g on Windows 2003 server. After the database was working for few weeks it started to respond very slow. Statistics were up to date, indexes were rebuild, but the database was still very slow. Finally we restarted the server and the database was like new. We figure out that by some reason there were some memory leaks or other problem related to the Windows OS and after restarting the server the problem was gone. Since then the server is restarted every two-three weeks "just in case".
    Regards,
    sve

  • Exchange 2010 Slow Database Mount Time - Almost 1 Hour

    Hello -
    We have 2 DAG nodes on the production site running EX2010 SP3 RU6
    In preparation for Windows patching I moved the active copy of DB2 active from EX2 to EX1, this took approx 20 seconds as per usual
    Patching happened, and EX2 got a reboot
    Later that evening I moved the active copy of DB2 back from EX1 to EX2
    The move took 59 minutes and 32 seconds
    During which time the DB status showed as mounting on EX2 and mailboxes where inaccessible [luckily this was out of hours]
    The DB is 185 GB with 4 GB of logs at that time
    There weren't ESE events related to playing transaction logs
    There have been ESE 629 events in the log for a while showing... "While attempting to move to the next or previous node in a B-Tree, the database skipped over 25583 non-visible nodes in 73 pages... The database may benefit from widening the online maintenance
    window..." but these warnings show up really quickly on our site even with a new database
    We also have a problem that emerged approx 2 weeks ago where CPU runs at 100% for prolonged periods [mainly store.exe for 10/20/30 mins] and people get slow response times in Outlook, it's running on 4 x vCPU's and 18 GB RAM
    Could the really slow mount time be related to DB corruption?
    Thanks

    Thanks for the feedback
    This is not related to a dirty shutdown
    According to Get-MailboxDatabaseCopyStatus etc all DB copies are healthy
    I tested the DB activation again last night
    Mailbox Database 2 is normally active on EX2
    So we made the copy on EX1 active [server is on the same network] and this took 3 secs
    When it came to making the same DB active on EX2 again it took 1 hr 46 mins 34 seconds!
    We ran the task from EMC and the GUI did not hang, all the while it kept counting the hours, minutes & seconds
    During this time mailboxes were unavailable, and the DB status showed as Mounting in EMC
    From the Event Log, when ESE event 326 is finally logged there are some timings…
     Internal Timing Sequence: [1] 0.000, [2] 0.000, [3] 0.031, [4] 0.000, [5] 0.000, [6] 0.094, [7] 0.000, [8] 6386.578,
    [9] 0.016, [10] 0.000, [11] 0.000, [12] 0.047.
    And step 8 [whatever that is] took 6386 seconds while everything else flew
    Of the 2 other Mailbox DB’s… DB1 took 7 seconds to activate on EX2 and DB3 took 32 minutes 41 seconds
    Any ideas what is going on?
    Thanks
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        MSExchangeRepl
    Date:          12/08/2014 21:02:02
    Event ID:      2090
    Task Category: Action
    Level:         Information
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:     
    EX2.company.com
    Description:
    Database: Mailbox Database 2\EX2
    Mailbox server:
    EX2.company.com
    A failover or switchover occurred. Database Mailbox Database 2\EX2 will be
    mounted with no data loss.
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store
    Date:          12/08/2014 21:02:05
    Event ID:      9539
    Task Category: General
    Level:         Information
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:     
    EX2.company.com
    Description:
    The Microsoft Exchange Information Store database "c21e43b5-feb8-4bde-a993-aca830cd71a3: /o=Company X/ou=Exchange
    Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=xxx.company.com/cn=Microsoft
    Private MDB" was stopped.
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store
    Date:          12/08/2014 21:02:05
    Event ID:      1000
    Task Category: General
    Level:         Information
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:     
    EX2.company.com
    Description:
    Attempting to start the Information Store "Mailbox Database 2".
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        ESE
    Date:          12/08/2014 21:02:05
    Event ID:      102
    Task Category: General
    Level:         Information
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:     
    EX2.company.com
    Description:
    Information Store (4308) Mailbox Database 2:  The database engine (14.03.0162.0000) is starting a new instance (4).
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        ESE
    Date:          12/08/2014 21:02:06
    Event ID:      105
    Task Category: General
    Level:         Information
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:     
    EX2.company.com
    Description:
    Information Store (4308) Mailbox Database 2: The database engine started a new instance (4). (Time=0 seconds)
    Internal Timing Sequence: [1] 0.000, [2] 0.000, [3] 0.109, [4] 0.079, [5] 0.000, [6] 0.000, [7] 0.000, [8] 0.000, [9] 0.219, [10] 0.000, [11] 0.000.
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        ESE
    Date:          12/08/2014 22:48:33
    Event ID:      326
    Task Category: General
    Level:         Information
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:     
    EX2.company.com
    Description:
    Information Store (4308) Mailbox Database 2: The database engine attached a database (4, X:\Database\Mailbox Database 2\Mailbox Database 2.edb). (Time=6386 seconds)
    Internal Timing Sequence: [1] 0.000, [2] 0.000, [3] 0.031, [4] 0.000, [5] 0.000, [6] 0.094, [7] 0.000, [8] 6386.578, [9] 0.016, [10] 0.000, [11] 0.000, [12] 0.047.
    Saved Cache: 1

  • Slow Database Problem.....Plz Help

    We r having Oracle 8i(8.1.6.0) database on Windows NT 4.00.1381 with 512 mb RAM...on ACER Server..with 2 disks..of 80 gb.
    Users complaining about slow inset activity ..
    Slow insert actvity occurs in some master tables like
    coll90 contains 389565 rows
    bnkcol 260281
    ftrn 70500
    bnk_pay 145000
    adj_pay 230000
    tables are not partinitioned....
    these are some of the table used in accounting entery module....
    erp is written in d2k 6.0
    in entery program they have used query to find max of company's record_no and add 1 to that no and then call insert statement to add record in master tables..
    as soon as accountants start entering data Task Manager in Windows NT shows above 90% CPU usage
    how to find where is the problem
    some query depending on this master tables also performing slow ...
    plz guide me...
    thanks in advance....
    regards
    mits

    in entery program they have used query to find max of
    company's record_no and add 1 to that no and then
    call insert statement to add record in master
    tables..use trace as others have suggested to be sure where is the real problem, but as you've described this scenario it looks like it will never perform well. Getting max value and then incrementing it will be slow and subject to possible collisions in multi user environment, because doing things simultaneously a few users may get the same max value and increment it by 1. The real way to go there are sequences. They generate unique numbers, though there may be gaps. You have two choices either to use sequences, have gaps and perform well or do some kind of serialization using max or a different table, don't have gaps but perform slow.
    Gints Plivna
    http://www.gplivna.eu

  • Slow database link behaviour

    I've written an accouting program 15 years ago that runs on developer, with excellent performance overall. Now I'm trying to write an apex program that uses a database link to access the data on a 10.1.0.3.0 SE database. Two things are happening: 1) every once in a while, when I navigate on a view in an XE report (the usual "next 15 records" option,) apex asks if I want to "save" the file (f.bin) and then it gets real slow! Too slow for commercial use... I mean, it takes minutes to move between pages. 2) every two pages that I navigate, it gets really, really slow! It goes from the first page to the next fast; fast again; and then sloooow; fast, fast and then slow; fast, fast, and then: save the page. It is driving me nuts. I've tried using a 10g SE table@, I've tried using a 10g SE view@, and I've tried using an XE view on a 10g SE table - but I am having the same results... However, if I write an XE table, based on a 10g SE view, and do not use the database link, keeping everything local (using only the XE) - it gets very fast, and the strange behavour ends! I wanted to use a database link because it would be easier, much simpler to write the program, and very dynamic. If a have to transfer data between databases it will be much harder to do it.
    Any ideas? Has anyone come across such behaviour? Do you believe it could be a bad installation? By the way, the 10g SE runs on RHES4 and the XE runs on debian; I'am using apex 2.0. Thanks.

    An update on the problem: I've decided to go with the whole XE solution, and I wrote another application, that works just fine! It's normal, I mean, fast! That is, until I transfer data between databases - then it gets real slow until the user logs out. Interesting, isn't it? Later on I'll try the other way around, connecting to SE and transfering the data from XE. I am using something like:
    insert into table@dblink select * from table; delete from table;
    insert into table select * from table@dblink; delete from table@dblink;

  • Slow database connection with mysql

    I am using MySQL Server 5.0 as my backend and java1.5 as my front end for the GUI. The following statements I use to connect to MYSql.
    Class.forName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver").newInstance();
    String url = "jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mysql";
    The database access seems to be very slow.
    I have a data file with about 3000 lines. The parser reads the file one line at a time, formats an insert query and calls executeUpdate. The process takes more than 2 minutes.
    What is slowing down my process? Please help
    Thanks

    I am using MySQL Server 5.0 as my backend and java1.5
    as my front end for the GUI. The following statements
    I use to connect to MYSql.
    Class.forName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver").newInstance();
    String url = "jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mysql";
    The database access seems to be very slow.
    I have a data file with about 3000 lines. The parser
    reads the file one line at a time, formats an insert
    query and calls executeUpdate. The process takes more
    than 2 minutes.
    What is slowing down my process? Please help
    ThanksHi,
    1. Are you opening and closing the database connection ,During inserting every record from data file?
    If so, please avoid opening closing connection for each query execution.
    Because , opening and closing the database connection is a time consuming one.
    You should open all the required database connections, before you use them or use
    Database connection pooling if your application is sucah a big one.
    2. Try PreparedStatment instead of Statement. Because Prepared statment query is
    compiled and stored into Cache. so if you are executing the same query again and again, the compiled query will be picked up from cache, by replacing with new
    parameters
    3. Check the logic you used to pick record from datafile and insert into database .
    4. Check your RAM size , if you installed database and jvm on same machine.
    if so , increase your RAM size.
    thanks,
    nvseenu

  • Slow rman backup and slow database

    Hello all,
    Whenever I run rman backup to sbt_tape, the complete database becomes slow. Also RMAN takes more than 12 hours to complete.
    RMAN script is:
    run {
    allocate channel t1 type 'sbt_tape' parms 'ENV=(TDPO_OPTFILE=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt)';
    sql 'alter system switch logfile';
    backup incremental level 2 tag 'db_level2_backup'
    format'%d/INC2/%t/%s/%p'
    database diskratio=0;
    backup
    format '%d/LOG_INC2/%t/%s/%p'
    archivelog all
    delete all input;
    release channel t1;
    }The AWR shows following "Top 5 timed events"
    Event                                      Waits     Time(s)     Avg Wait(ms)     % Total Call Time     Wait Class
    db file sequential read                    817,467     17,419         21                         28.6         User I/O
    CPU time                                  14,294                              23.5     
    log file sync                            141,642     8,570         61                         14.1          Commit
    enq: TX - row lock contention              3,371     7,171       2,127                          11.8         Application
    log file parallel write                     149,486     5,356         36                           8.8           System I/OWhat can be done? Can anyone tell what wrong is happening here?
    Database is 10.2.0.4
    OS is AIX 5.3
    SGA_TARGET is 6G
    PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET is 2G
    Total physical RAM is 12G
    EBiz application is running in the same server
    Regards,
    SA

    On my server, we needed to adjust the vmm on aix for oracle to run best. Before I did that it was really slow.
    http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-aixoracle/index.html
    Specifically these as outlined in the document linked above:
    Listing 3. Changing the default setting for the lru_file_repage parameter using vmo
    root@lpar21ml16ed_pub[] > vmo -o lru_file_repage=0
    Setting lru_file_repage to 0
    root@lpar21ml16ed_pub[] >
    Setting this to 0 tells the VMM that you want to steal only file pages and not computational pages. As this will change if the numperm < minperm or > maxperm, we will make maxperm high and minperm very low. Years ago, before the lru_file_repage parameter was introduced, we used to make maxperm low. If we did this now, we would stop the application caching programs that are currently running.
    Listing 4 shows how we'll set these parameters:
    Listing 4. Setting the minperm, maxperm and maxclient parameters
    vmo -p -o minperm%=5
    vmo -p -o maxperm%=90
    vmo -p -o maxclient%=90
    We also want to take a look at minfree and maxfree. When the pages on our free list fall below minfree, the VMM will start to steal pages, which we don't want to happen until the free list has beefed up the number in maxfree. The values should be similar to the ones shown in Listing 5.
    Listing 5. Setting the minfree and maxfree parameters
    vmo -p -o minfree=960
    vmo -p -o maxfree=1088
    Edited by: user455434 on Oct 12, 2010 1:14 PM

  • Slow DataBase Access using JDK 1.5 and MySQL

    Hi EveryBody,
    I am using Jdk1.5 in my project and mysql 5.0 as my database server.
    The problem is that, to create a connection for the first time it takes upto 20 to 25 seconds.
    when i use the 1.4.2 with the same mysql version it takes only 2 seconds.
    In both the cases i am using the JDBC driver (com.mysql.jdbc.Driver )
    I cannot understand the problem with the jdk1.5,
    so, please help me in resoving this issue.

    I encountered same problem with connecting Oralce.
    It's a bug of JDK1.5.
    You need upgrade JDK1.5 to latest version,or use IP address instead of machine name(such as locahost etc.).
    Message was edited by:
    LucasLee

Maybe you are looking for

  • ITunes bug? Rating stars won't click-drag left-right anymore

    The latest iTunes patch (v10.1.0.54 running on Windows 7) seems to have an annoying bug: When I'm rating a song, it immediately takes my initial click, regardless of whether I hold down the mouse button -- whereas I used to be able to click in the ar

  • Re:viewing option on the destop files

    Hi, I have issue with viewing option on the destop files! After setting up the way I want them (Snap to Grid) though they stay where they are while I am working but, once I restart, log out or shut down the computer, I find them repalced or moved aro

  • Goods movement accounting in Cross Company Code Sales

    Hi everybody, I´m implementing cross company code sales and i have a question about the goods movement accounting in the selling company. In the process, the goods are delivered directly to the final customer by the delivering company. These goods ne

  • Ap div moves in IE

    I placed an image in the draw ap div tool and placed it above a background image. When previewed in IE, the image in the ap div moved to the left, which is also the edge of the div for the main content. What am I doing wrong. Thank you

  • Analysing data on text files

    I am very new to learning java and I am trying to find out how I can assign data on a text file to variables for me to analyse, but I'm not sure how to do it. I know how too read in each line of the file, but I'm not sure how to assign each of the nu