Replacement of SEARCH ITAB statement in ECC 6.0

Hello Experts,
Can anybody tell me, which statement i can use to replace an obsolete statement i.e. SEARCH ITAB in ECC 6.0?
Thanks in advance!!
Best Regards,
Bhupinder

Hello,
While using FIND statement, i am getting bellow syntax error
As line type of the table "ITAB" in the CHAR MODE a indication-like and/or in the BYTE MODE a byte-like field was expected.
My statement is
FIND FIRST OCCURRENCE OF 'WHERE'
IN TABLE ITAB
What should i do to resolve this sytax error?
Best Regards,
Bhupinder

Similar Messages

Two finger swipe replaces google search string

MBP with Safari 6.0 experiencing this problem. Another user was experiencing the issue here:
http://www.ehmac.ca/mac-iphone-ipad-ipod-help-troubleshooting/99937-safari-two-f inger-swipe-bug-replaces-google-search-string-os-10-7-3-a.html
I don't know where the bug reports are to follow up on it and I haven't seen any patches for it. Any advice? Specifically, I'd like to know how to file the bug (in case I find another) and to follow up on any existing issues.
TIA,
Scott

Is there no place to track the status of the report or see any other outstanding issues so I don't bother filing duplicates?
Never heard of such a function here. This method gets feedback to the people who count but it is completely behind the scenes. Part of Apple's "cards close to the chest" method of doing pretty much everything. You should have been looking at the "don't expect a response" screen after you hit the submit button on your bug report.
If there is something that needs clarification, I suspect they will use e-mail to ask for it, but don't stay home waiting!
Have you read Walter Isaacson's biography of Steve Jobs? Things like this took on a new--if not satisfying--perspective for me after reading it. So far, it has persisted in their corporate culture in the after-Steve era..

Replacement for F1F logical database for ECC 6.0

Hi to all experts.
What is the replacement for F1F logical database in ECC 6.0.

Hi,
it's logical database FMF. More info about conversion is in OSS note 403150.
Cheers

PROBELM WITH TYPE X VALUE '20' IN CONCATENATE STATEMENT in ECC version

Hi EXPERTS,
 I am working in ECC 6.0 version.
 PROBELM WITH TYPE X VALUE '20' IN CONCATENATE STATEMENT in ECC version
 C_DEL TYPE X VALUE '09' having solution --C_DEL TYPE C VALUE CL_ABAP_CHAR_UTILITIES=>HORIZONTAL_TAB,
 If C_DEL TYPE X VALUE '20' what was the solution in ECC version.
 Please let me know. I am awaiting for ur answers
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Message was edited by:
 Alvaro Tejada Galindo

Hi
welcome to SDN forum
move that X field to a char field and use in concatenation
CONCATENATE works only with CHAR fields
Regards
Anji

Obsolete statements in ECC with respect to 4.5b

Hi Gurus,
This is really very urgent.i need an information on Obsolete Statements in ECC 6.0 with respect to 4.5B R/3 Version.please help me..
Full marks would be rewarded 100%
regards
Sahil

Hi
check the table PRGN_CORR2 which gives the list of transactions that were changed from different versions from 3.1G to 4.70 and also above versions
Pls check this
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5ac31178-0701-0010-469a-b4d7fa2721ca
Reward if useful
Regards
Raghav T

The site addresses what I'm on keep getting replaced with "search or enter address" please help

whenever I open a new tab the site address is replaced with "search or enter address" and automatically prepares me to type in the address. this means I can't copy the site address of the website I'm on as there is nothing I can copy.

Sometimes a problem with Firefox may be a result of malware installed on your computer, that you may not be aware of.
You can try these free programs to scan for malware, which work with your existing antivirus software:
* [http://www.microsoft.com/security/scanner/default.aspx Microsoft Safety Scanner]
* [http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free/ MalwareBytes' Anti-Malware]
* [http://support.kaspersky.com/faq/?qid=208283363 TDSSKiller - AntiRootkit Utility]
* [http://www.surfright.nl/en/hitmanpro/ Hitman Pro]
* [http://www.eset.com/us/online-scanner/ ESET Online Scanner]
[http://windows.microsoft.com/MSE Microsoft Security Essentials] is a good permanent antivirus for Windows 7/Vista/XP if you don't already have one.
Further information can be found in the [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues caused by malware]] article.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

Programmatically return the to no search conducted state

how do i return a vo to no search conducted state, the vo.reset method doesnt seem to work for me.

Loosing AM is not a good idea.... as it makes you loose entire BC4J objects state included in AM. Clear Cache should work... if VO is not based on EO, otherwise u need to interate through VO and delete row, which is offcourse not a good idea.
The best solution here is... to press query with some dummy assignment, like 1=2.
--Mukul

Regarding types statement in ECC 6.0...plz reply..urgent

Hi,
I am copying a program which is in 4.7 to ECC 6.0,i am facing error regarding structures with types...
The following code in 4.7
DATA:BEGIN OF W_BMM00.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE BMM00.
DATA:END OF W_BMM00.
DATA:BEGIN OF W_BMMH1.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE BMMH1.
DATA:END OF W_BMMH1.
DATA:BEGIN OF W_BMMH7.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE BMMH7.
DATA:END OF W_BMMH7.
DATA : BEGIN OF TAB_TLINE OCCURS 0.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE TLINE.
DATA : END OF TAB_TLINE.
i have written the same in ECC6.0 as below
TYPES:BEGIN OF tw_bmm00.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE bmm00.
TYPES:END OF tw_bmm00 ,
 tt_bmm00 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF tw_bmm00.
TYPES:BEGIN OF tw_bmmh1.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE bmmh1.
TYPES:END OF tw_bmmh1 ,
 tt_bmmh1 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF tw_bmmh1.
TYPES:BEGIN OF tw_bmmh7.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE bmmh7.
TYPES:END OF tw_bmmh7 ,
 tt_bmmh7 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF tw_bmmh7.
TYPES:BEGIN OF tw_TAB_TLINE.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE TLINE.
TYPES:END OF tw_TAB_TLINE,
 tt_tab_tline TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF tw_tab_tline.
lw_bmm00 TYPE tw_bmm00,
 lt_bmm00 TYPE tt_bmm00,
 lw_bmmh1 TYPE tw_bmmh1,
 lt_bmmh1 TYPE tt_bmmh1,
 lw_bmmh7 TYPE tw_bmmh7,
 lt_bmmh7 TYPE tt_bmmh7,
 lw_tab_thead TYPE tw_tab_thead,
 lt_tab_thead TYPE tt_tab_thead,....
when i check SLIN errors i am getting the following errors...plz resolve..
The current ABAP command is obsolete
Within classes and interfaces, you can only use "TYPE" to refer to ABAP Dictionary
types (not "LIKE" or "STRUCTURE").


include strture not allowed.
rules.
ABAP Development under Unicode
Prior to Unicode the length of a character was exactly one byte, allowing implicit typecasts or memory-layout oriented programming. With Unicode this situation has changed: One character is no longer one byte, so that additional specifications have to be added to define the unit of measure for implicit or explicit references to (the length of) characters.
Character-like data in ABAP are always represented with the UTF-16 - standard (also used in Java or other development tools like Microsoft's Visual Basic); but this format is not related to the encoding of the underlying database.
A Unicode-enabled ABAP program (UP) is a program in which all Unicode checks are effective. Such a program returns the same results in a non-Unicode system (NUS) as in a Unicode system (US). In order to perform the relevant syntax checks, you must activate the Unicode flag in the screens of the program and class attributes.
In a US, you can only execute programs for which the Unicode flag is set. In future, the Unicode flag must be set for all SAP programs to enable them to run on a US. If the Unicode flag is set for a program, the syntax is checked and the program executed according to the rules described in this document, regardless of whether the system is a US or a NUS. From now on, the Unicode flag must be set for all new programs and classes that are created.
If the Unicode flag is not set, a program can only be executed in an NUS. The syntactical and semantic changes described below do not apply to such programs. However, you can use all language extensions that have been introduced in the process of the conversion to Unicode.
As a result of the modifications and restrictions associated with the Unicode flag, programs are executed in both Unicode and non-Unicode systems with the same semantics to a large degree. In rare cases, however, differences may occur. Programs that are designed to run on both systems therefore need to be tested on both platforms.
Other Changes
1. Bit Statements
2. Adding Field Sequences
3. Loops with VARY and VARYING
4. Creating Subroutines
5. Saving Programs
6. Assigning Types for GET/SET PARAMETER
7. Unreachable Statements
8. Function Modules with Incorrect Parameter Names
1. Bit Statements
Previously, the system checked for the bit statements SET BIT i OF f [TO g] and GET BIT i OF f [INTO g]whether the field f is character-type; X fields, X strings, and flat structures are usually regarded as character-type. For Unicode programs this is no longer useful, because the types X and XSTRING no longer count as character-type and the bit by bit access to character-type fields or structures is no longer platform-independent. Therefore, with these operations in Unicode programs, the field f must be type X or XSTRING.
For the bit mask operations f O x, f Z x, and f M x you could previously use all number-type and hence all character-type types for the left operand f. In Unicode programs, the f operand must now be type X or XSTRING.
2. Adding Field Sequences
When adding field sequences, restrictions apply to the following statements in Unicode:
ADD n1 THEN n2 UNTIL nz [ ACCORDING TO sel ] GIVING m ...
ADD n1 THEN n2 UNTIL nz TO m [ RANGE str ].
1. The operands n1, n2, and nz must be type-compatible with one another.
2. The distance between nz and n1 must be an integral multiple of the distance between n2 and n1.
3. A syntax or runtime error occurs if the fields n1, n2, and nz are not in a structure. This structure must be recognizable statically or its valid area must be marked explicitly using the RANGE addition.
4. At runtime, the system ensures that the RANGE area is not left.
ADD n1 FROM i1 GIVING m [ RANGE str ].
1. Field n1 must be within the structure. The structure must be explicitly defined using the RANGE addition if it is not recognizable statically.
2. For this variant, the system also checks at runtime whether n1 and the addressed values are within the structure.
3. Loops
Loops with the VARY or VARYING addition are also problematic in Unicode, since a type-a access to memory contents cannot be ensured and memory can be overwritten inadvertently.
DO ... VARYING f FROM f1 NEXT f2.
For this statement, the fields f, f1, and f2 must be type-compatible with each other. To prevent memory contents being overwritten, a RANGE for valid accesses is introduced implicitly or explicitly for the following statements:
DO ... TIMES VARYING f FROM f1 NEXT f2 [ RANGE f3 ].
WHILE ... VARY f FROM f1 NEXT f2 [ RANGE f3 ].
A syntax or runtime error is caused if f1 or f2 are not included in f3. If the RANGE addition is missing, it is defined implicitly from FROM f1 NEXT f2 as follows:
1. If both f1 and f2 are statically recognizable components of the same structure, the valid RANGE area is defined from the smallest structure that comprises f1 and f2.
2. A syntax error is triggered if it is recognizable statically that f1 and f2 are not part of the same structure.
3. A valid area must be defined explicitly using the RANGE addition if the connection between f1 and f2 is not recognizable statically.
If you specify a deep structure as the RANGE addition, the system checks for every loop pass that there are no field references, object references, tables, or strings in the area read.
4. Creating Subroutines
When automatically generating subroutines using the statement GENERATE SUBROUTINE POOL itab NAME name, the generated program inherits the content of the Unicode flag of the generating program.
5. Saving Programs
When automatically generating programs using the statement INSERT REPORT prog FROM itab, default values are set for the TRDIR entry as before. Amongst other things, this statement has the new addition UNICODE ENABLING uc, with which the Unicode flag of the inserted report receives the value of uc. If this addition is missing, the following applies:
1. A Unicode program creates a Unicode program.
2. A non-Unicode program in turn creates a non-Unicode program.
3. A non-Unicode program becomes a Unicode program if it is overwritten by a Unicode program.
4. A Unicode program remains a Unicode program if it is overwritten by a non-Unicode program.
6. Assigning Types for GET/SET PARAMETER
For the statements GET PARAMETER ID pid FIELD f and GET PARAMETER ID pid FIELD f, f must be character-type. You can use the EXPORT and IMPORT statements for storing non-character-type fields and structures.
7. Unreachable Statements
In Unicode programs, unreachable statements cause a syntax error. In non-Unicode programs, there was previously only a syntax warning.
8. Function Modules with Incorrect Parameter Names
In Unicode programs, calling a function module, whose parameter names are specified statically as a literal or constant, causes an exception that can be handled if an incorrect parameter name was specified. This only applies to function modules that are not called via Remote Function Call. In non-Unicode programs, an incorrect name was previously ignored.
http://service.sap.com/instguides
--> SAP Business Suite Applications
--> SAP ERP
--> mySAP ERP 2005
--> Upgrade
--> Upgrade Documentation - mySAP ERP 2005 SR2
There choose your database and operating system.
If you're looking for functional details check
http://service.sap.com/releasenotes

Syntax Error with EXPORT statement in ECC 6

Hi All,
I have one issue with EXPORT statement syntax.
I have declared data like below:
DATA: BEGIN OF mem_id,
          mandt LIKE sy-mandt,
          uname LIKE sy-uname,
          modno LIKE sy-modno,
        END OF mem_id.
export the memory id
    EXPORT E_VBKOK XANZPK TEXTTAB XBOLNR TO MEMORY ID MEM_ID.
When I am checking the syntax error i am getting like "MEM_ID" must be a character-type field (data type C, N, D or T). by "INTERFACE". by "INTERFACE". "INTERFACE". by "INTERFACE". by "INTERFACE".
I know this statement would be like IMPORT ITAB TO JTAB FROM MEMORY ID 'table'. So I have written like below
EXPORT E_VBKOK XANZPK TEXTTAB XBOLNR TO MEMORY ID 'MEM_ID'. But still it is throwing an error.
Can you please let me know how can I resolve this?
Regards,
Jyothi CH.

Hi Jyothi,
data: l_var type string.
concatenate '6' '8' into l_var separated by space.
export l_var to memory id 'BB'.
Here we have to declare the type(structure) for l_var not for BB
and in another program
data:l_var type string.
import l_var from memory id 'BB'.
write : l_var.

Replacement of Function Module 'www_get_mime_object' in ECC 6.0

HI,
I need an exact replacement for the Function Module 'www_get_mime_object' in ECC 6.0.
Please help it out.
Regards,
Ashok.

hey

Replacement code for Translate statement in latest version

Replacement code for
TABLES XXXX USING <r> LIKE <r>
TRANSLATE <r>-<fieldname> TO UPPER CASE.
<r> is a structure

Hi,
TRANSLATE ... TO UPPER/LOWER CASE
TRANSLATE ... USING
The arguments of these instructions must be single fields of type C, N, D, T or STRING or purely character-type structures. There is a syntax or runtime error if arguments of a different type are passed. A subset of this function is provided with the addition IN BYTE MODE for processing byte strings that is, operands of type X or XSTRING. A statement such as CONCATENATE a x b INTO c is thus no longer possible when a, b, and c are all character-type, but x is of type X.
TRANSLATE ... CODEPAGE ...
TRANSLATE ... NUMBER FORMAT ...
The above statements are not allowed in Unicode programs
Reward points
Regards

PROBLEM IN MOVE STATEMENT IN ECC 6.0

hi EXPERTS,
THE FOLLOWING CODE WORKS FINE IN 4.6C BUT IN ECC 6.0 THE MOVE STATEMENT AT THE END THROWS ERROR.
""INNNN" and "I0008" are not mutually convertible. In Unicode systems, "INNNN" must have the same structure layout (fragment view) as"I0008", regardless of the length of the Unicode character."
DATA: i0001 LIKE p0001 OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
 i0008 LIKE p0008 ,
 innnn like PRELP.
SELECT * INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i0001
 FROM pa0001
 WHERE begda <= 20061201
 AND endda >= 20061201
 AND pernr = 00014442 .
READ TABLE i0001 INDEX 1.
 i0008-trfgr = i0001-persk.
 CASE i0001-persg.
 WHEN '4'.
 i0008-trfst = i0001-persg.
 WHEN '7'.
 i0008-trfst = i0001-persg.
 WHEN '8'.
 i0008-trfst = i0001-persg.
 WHEN OTHERS.
 i0008-trfst = '1' .
 ENDCASE.
 MOVE i0008 TO innnn.
I'VE ALSO CHECKED THE SAME PROGRAM IN DEBUGGER IN 4.6C.
I'VE FOUND THAT THE VALUES FOR i0008-trfgr i0008-trfst ARE TOGETHER STORED IN THE FIELD DATA1 OF INNNN. BUT THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN IN ECC 6.0.
PLEASE HELP.
ITS URGENT.

Hi priya,
DATA: i0001 LIKE p0001 OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
i0008 LIKE p0008 ,
declare innnn like this and check
innnn like p008.
regards,
Nagaraj

New Provide statement in ECC 6.0

Hi All,
I am getting infotype 0001 information by using function module HR_READ_INFOTYPE.Now i need to check the Employee subgroup (PERSK) change from 11 to 12 .For this i need to use PROVIDE statment and if change happens i need to make a returning parameter false.
How can i use the new provide statement
l_sub is a flag.
*provide fields * from p0001 into l_temp VALID l_sub*
BOUNDS persk AND persk BETWEEN l_begda AND l_endda.
i am not getting any records while running this query.Can you please help me out.What l_temp returns if the loop pass success.In bound what i need to give here i need to check the persk value.
Thanks
Chandu

Hi Chandu,
When you are using the bounds statement in a provide field statement,
the two fields on which the bound condition is being applied have to be
different columns of same type of the table from which you are selecting the values..
For eg
PROVIDE fields * from p0001 into itab valid flag1 BOUNDS begda AND endda
BETWEEN pnpbegda AND pnpendda.
What you are using is not giving any values is because it is referring to only
one column of the table p0001.
Get Back if u still have Doubts
Ira !!

READ TABLE statement in ECC 6.0

hi,
in 4.6, my statement was
READ TABLE S_XVTTS WHERE TKNUM = S_XVTTK-TKNUM
AND NOT S_XVTTS-VSTEL IS INITIAL.
This wont work in ECC 6.0, hence I need to modify this. so i write like
READ TABLE S_XVTTS INTO wa_vttsvb WITH KEY TKNUM = S_XVTTK-TKNUM ..................................
how to accomodate the check for NOT initial of S_XVTTS-VSTEL .. how will my statement look like ? thks

Hi Sdnuser1,
Try to use LOOP statement as follow.
"// This LOOP read only one line of table s_xvtt exactly as READ TABLE do.
LOOP AT s_xvtts INTO wa_vttsv WHERE tknum EQ s_xvttk-tknum AND s_xvtts-vstel IS NOT INITIAL.
EXIT.
ENDLOOP.
IF sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
"// You can use wa_vttsv
ELSE.
"// Do something
ENDIF.
I hope it helps yous.
Greetings.
Marcelo Ramos

Perform statement in ECC 6.0

hi,
So is it the best practice that we have to avoid creating FORM-ENDFORM in ECC 6.0 and also avoid using PERFORM statement ? what will be the alternative for this ?
I have a couple of includes where there are lots of FORMS.
thks

Use METHODS instead of creating FORM-PERFORM. ECC is all about Object Oriented Concepts.

Replacement of SEARCH ITAB statement in ECC 6.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for