Report taking too much time in the portal

Hi freiends,
we have developed a report on the ods,and we publish the same on the portal.
the problem is when the users are executing the report at the same time it is taking too much time.because of this the perfoemance is very poor.
is there any way to sort out this issue,like can we send the report to the individual user's mail id
so that they can not log in to the portal
or can we create the same report on the cube.
what could be the main difference if the report made on the cube or ods?
please help me
thanks in advance
sridath

Hi
Try this to improve performance of query
Find the query Run-time
where to find the query Run-time ?
557870 'FAQ BW Query Performance'
130696 - Performance trace in BW
This info may be helpful.
General tips
Using aggregates and compression.
Using less and complex cell definitions if possible.
1. Avoid using too many nav. attr
2. Avoid RKF and CKF
3. Many chars in row.
By using T-codes ST03 or ST03N
Go to transaction ST03 > switch to expert mode > from left side menu > and there in system load history and distribution for a particular day > check query execution time.
/people/andreas.vogel/blog/2007/04/08/statistical-records-part-4-how-to-read-st03n-datasets-from-db-in-nw2004
/people/andreas.vogel/blog/2007/03/16/how-to-read-st03n-datasets-from-db
Try table rsddstats to get the statistics
Using cache memory will decrease the loading time of the report.
Run reporting agent at night and sending results to email. This will ensure use of OLAP cache. So later report execution will retrieve the result faster from the OLAP cache.
Also try
1. Use different parameters in ST03 to see the two important parameters aggregation ratio and records transferred to F/E to DB selected.
2. Use the program SAP_INFOCUBE_DESIGNS (Performance of BW infocubes) to see the aggregation ratio for the cube. If the cube does not appear in the list of this report, try to run RSRV checks on the cube and aggregates.
Go to SE38 > Run the program SAP_INFOCUBE_DESIGNS
It will shown dimension Vs Fact tables Size in percent.If you mean speed of queries on a cube as performance metric of cube,measure query runtime.
3. To check the performance of the aggregates,see the columns valuation and usage in aggregates.
Open the Aggregates...and observe VALUATION and USAGE columns.
"---" sign is the valuation of the aggregate. You can say -3 is the valuation of the aggregate design and usage. ++ means that its compression is good and access is also more (in effect, performance is good). If you check its compression ratio, it must be good. -- means the compression ratio is not so good and access is also not so good (performance is not so good).The more is the positives...more is useful the aggregate and more it satisfies the number of queries. The greater the number of minus signs, the worse the evaluation of the aggregate. The larger the number of plus signs, the better the evaluation of the aggregate.
if "-----" then it means it just an overhead. Aggregate can potentially be deleted and "+++++" means Aggregate is potentially very useful.
In valuation column,if there are more positive sign it means that the aggregate performance is good and it is useful to have this aggregate.But if it has more negative sign it means we need not better use that aggregate.
In usage column,we will come to know how far the aggregate has been used in query.
Thus we can check the performance of the aggregate.
Refer.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/b8/23813b310c4a0ee10000000a114084/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/60/f0fb411e255f24e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
performance ISSUE related to AGGREGATE
Note 356732 - Performance Tuning for Queries with Aggregates
Note 166433 - Options for finding aggregates (find optimal aggregates for an InfoCube)
4. Run your query in RSRT and run the query in the debug mode. Select "Display Aggregates Found" and "Do not use cache" in the debug mode. This will tell you if it hit any aggregates while running. If it does not show any aggregates, you might want to redesign your aggregates for the query.
Also your query performance can depend upon criteria and since you have given selection only on one infoprovider...just check if you are selecting huge amount of data in the report
Check for the query read mode in RSRT.(whether its A,X or H)..advisable read mode is X.
5. In BI 7 statistics need to be activated for ST03 and BI admin cockpit to work.
By implementing BW Statistics Business Content - you need to install, feed data and through ready made reports which for analysis.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/26/4bc0417951d117e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
/people/vikash.agrawal/blog/2006/04/17/query-performance-150-is-aggregates-the-way-out-for-me
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1955ba90-0201-0010-d3aa-8b2a4ef6bbb2
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ce7fb368-0601-0010-64ba-fadc985a1f94
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c1/0dbf65e04311d286d6006008b32e84/frameset.htm
You can go to T-Code DB20 which gives you all the performance related information like
Partitions
Databases
Schemas
Buffer Pools
Tablespaces etc
use tool RSDDK_CHECK_AGGREGATE in se38 to check for the corrupt aggregates
If aggregates contain incorrect data, you must regenerate them.
202469 - Using aggregate check tool
Note 646402 - Programs for checking aggregates (as of BW 3.0B SP15)
You can find out whether an aggregate is usefull or useless you can find out through a proccess of checking the tables RSDDSTATAGGRDEF*
Run the query in RSRT with statistics execute and come back you will get STATUID... copy this and check in the table...
This gives you exactly which infoobjects it's hitting, if any one of the object is missing it's useless aggregate.
6
Check SE11 > table RSDDAGGRDIR . You can find the last callup in the table.
Generate Report in RSRT
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cccad390-0201-0010-5093-fd9ec8157802
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4c0ab590-0201-0010-bd9a-8332d8b4f09c
Business Intelligence Journal Improving Query Performance in Data Warehouses
http://www.tdwi.org/Publications/BIJournal/display.aspx?ID=7891
Achieving BI Query Performance Building Business Intelligence
http://www.dmreview.com/issues/20051001/1038109-1.html
Assign points if useful
Cheers
SM

Similar Messages

Crystal Report Taking too much time to load

Dear Support team,
Every time I open an existing Crystal Report, it is taking me about 5 minutes to load (Even if its a new and Blank report). Also after one report has loaded for the first time, Loading further reports would take the same long time.
Please note that I was not facing this problem earlier (Same Crystal Report version), this issue started occurring after I came back from a leave, and our IT guy have told me that he had uninstalled the Visual Studio in my absence (License issue), and no further relevant changes that he can think of.
Appreciate your help on resolving this issue, I work with a large number of crystal reports on daily basis, and this problem is killing my time.
Thank you for your time and support.
Best Regards,
Saadeddine Nahlous
Systems Developer

Hello again,
I just found out more info about this problem that might help us troubleshoot it:
My colleague and I were both using the Old Crystal Report version 10 (Before SAP) till about a month ago. Afterwards, I have installed the new SAP Crystal Reports 2013 Trial version to test it, and i faced no issues there and ordered to purchase the product. One week ago, my company bought for me and my colleague two licenses which arrived in two boxes containing two DVDs and we re installed the software using the DVDs. Since then we BOTH are facing this delay issue when opening any Crystal Report. (The delay is unbearable, it is truly about 3 min without exaggeration).
For the record, we both have high spec PCs.
Appreciate investigating this issue with us please.
Thank you

It is taking too much time run the page from Jdeveloper (R12)

Hi Gurus
When i m running a page in R12 from Jdeveloper ,it is taking abt 15-20 minutes to render the page ,it is happening first time with me ,i m working on Jdeveloper 10G .Would some one please give some hints . Am i missing some setting in Jdeveloper.
Thanx in advance
Pratap

Pratap
First thing that cause pages to load slow is the location of your database server.If you are working locally & your db server is located far in that case, your page loads slowly.Moreover you can try connecting with any server instance to test if this is not the issue with only that instance.Moreover if you would be running the page in Debug mode then also your page will load slowly.
Please update the thread if you finds any other issue.So that it may help others too
Thanks
AJ

It is taking too much time run the page from Jdeveloper

Hi Gurus
When i m running a page in from Jdeveloper ,it is taking abt 20-25 minutes to render the page ,it is happening first time with me ,i m working on Jdeveloper 10G version .Would some please give some hints .
Am i missing some setting in Jdeveloper.
Thanx in advance
Pratap

thank you shay for reply ,
i m sorry , i feel i have not given complete information ,
I m using JDeveloper for oracle EBS R12 and downloaded the patch p8431482_R12_GENERIC from metalink ,and i running the same excercises which is shipped with Jdeveloper.
Thanx
Pratap

Taking too much time in Rules(DTP Schedule run)

Hi,
I am Scheduling the DTP which have filters to minimize the load data.
when i run the DTP it is taking too much time in the "rules" (i can see the DTP monitor ststus package by pakage and step by step like "Start routine" "rules" and "End Routine")
here it is consuming too much time in Rules Mapping.
what is the problem and any solutions please...
regards,
sree

Hi,
Time taken at "rules" depends on the complexity involved there in ur routine. If it is a complex calculation it will take time.
Also check ur DTP batch settings, ie how many no. of background processes used to perform DTP, Job class.
U can find these :
goto DTP, select goto menu and select "Settings for Batch Manager".
In the screen increase no of Processes from 3 to higher no(max 9).
ChaNGE job class to 'A'.
If ur DTP is still running , cancel it ie Kill the DTP, delete from the Cube,
Change these settings and run ur DTP one more time.
U can observer the difference.
Reddy

Auto Invoice Program taking too much time : problem with update sql

Hi ,
Oracle db version 11.2.0.3
Oracle EBS version : 12.1.3
Though we have a SEV-1 SR with oracle we have not been able to find much success.
We have an auto invoice program which runs many times in the day and its taking too much time since the begining . On troubleshooting we have found one query to be taking too much of the time and seek suggestion on how to tune it. I am attaching the explain plan for the for same. Its an update query. Please guide.
Plan
UPDATE STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 0 Bytes: 124 Cardinality: 1
50 UPDATE AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL
27 FILTER
26 HASH JOIN Cost: 8,937,633 Bytes: 4,261,258,760 Cardinality: 34,364,990
24 VIEW VIEW SYS.VW_NSO_1 Cost: 8,618,413 Bytes: 446,744,870 Cardinality: 34,364,990
23 SORT UNIQUE Cost: 8,618,413 Bytes: 4,042,339,978 Cardinality: 34,364,990
22 UNION-ALL
9 FILTER
8 SORT GROUP BY Cost: 5,643,052 Bytes: 3,164,892,625 Cardinality: 25,319,141
7 HASH JOIN Cost: 1,640,602 Bytes: 32,460,436,875 Cardinality: 259,683,495
1 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL Cost: 154,993 Bytes: 402,499,500 Cardinality: 20,124,975
6 HASH JOIN Cost: 853,567 Bytes: 22,544,143,440 Cardinality: 214,706,128
4 HASH JOIN Cost: 536,708 Bytes: 2,357,000,550 Cardinality: 29,835,450
2 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL Cost: 153,008 Bytes: 1,163,582,550 Cardinality: 29,835,450
3 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES_ALL Cost: 307,314 Bytes: 1,193,526,000 Cardinality: 29,838,150
5 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL Cost: 132,951 Bytes: 3,123,197,116 Cardinality: 120,122,966
21 FILTER
20 SORT GROUP BY Cost: 2,975,360 Bytes: 877,447,353 Cardinality: 9,045,849
19 HASH JOIN Cost: 998,323 Bytes: 17,548,946,769 Cardinality: 180,916,977
13 VIEW VIEW AR.index$_join$_027 Cost: 108,438 Bytes: 867,771,256 Cardinality: 78,888,296
12 HASH JOIN
10 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_N15 Cost: 58,206 Bytes: 867,771,256 Cardinality: 78,888,296
11 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_U1 Cost: 62,322 Bytes: 867,771,256 Cardinality: 78,888,296
18 HASH JOIN Cost: 748,497 Bytes: 3,281,713,302 Cardinality: 38,159,457
14 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL Cost: 154,993 Bytes: 402,499,500 Cardinality: 20,124,975
17 HASH JOIN Cost: 519,713 Bytes: 1,969,317,900 Cardinality: 29,838,150
15 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES_ALL Cost: 302,822 Bytes: 716,115,600 Cardinality: 29,838,150
16 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL Cost: 149,847 Bytes: 1,253,202,300 Cardinality: 29,838,150
25 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL Cost: 157,552 Bytes: 5,158,998,615 Cardinality: 46,477,465
41 SORT GROUP BY Bytes: 75 Cardinality: 1
40 FILTER
39 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN Cost: 11 Bytes: 75 Cardinality: 1
35 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 8 Bytes: 50 Cardinality: 1
32 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 5 Bytes: 30 Cardinality: 1
29 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 22 Cardinality: 1
28 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES_U1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
31 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL Cost: 2 Bytes: 133,114,520 Cardinality: 16,639,315
30 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
34 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 20 Cardinality: 1
33 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_N6 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
38 BUFFER SORT Cost: 9 Bytes: 25 Cardinality: 1
37 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 25 Cardinality: 1
36 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_N1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
49 SORT GROUP BY Bytes: 48 Cardinality: 1
48 FILTER
47 NESTED LOOPS
45 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 7 Bytes: 48 Cardinality: 1
43 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL Cost: 4 Bytes: 20 Cardinality: 1
42 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_N6 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 1
44 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_N1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
46 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1
As per oracle , they had suggested multiple patches but that has not been helpful. Please suggest how do i tune this query. I dont have much clue of query tuning.
Regards

Hi Paul, My bad. I am sorry I missed it.
Query as below :
UPDATE RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST LGD SET (AMOUNT, ACCTD_AMOUNT) = (SELECT /*+ index(rec1 RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_N6) ordered */ NVL(LGD.AMOUNT, 0) - ( SUM(LGD2.AMOUNT) - ( DECODE(LGD.GL_DATE, REC1.GL_DATE, 1, 0) * CTL.EXTENDED_AMOUNT ) ), NVL(LGD.ACCTD_AMOUNT, 0) - ( SUM(LGD2.ACCTD_AMOUNT) - ( DECODE(LGD.GL_DATE, REC1.GL_DATE, 1, 0) * DECODE(:B2 , NULL, ROUND( CTL.EXTENDED_AMOUNT * NVL(CT.EXCHANGE_RATE,1), :B3 ), ROUND( ( CTL.EXTENDED_AMOUNT * NVL(CT.EXCHANGE_RATE,1) ) / :B2 ) * :B2 ) ) ) FROM RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES CTL, RA_CUSTOMER_TRX CT, RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST LGD2, RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST REC1 WHERE CTL.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID = LGD2.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID AND CTL.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = CT.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID AND LGD.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID = CTL.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID AND LGD2.ACCOUNT_SET_FLAG = 'N' AND REC1.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = CT.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID AND REC1.ACCOUNT_CLASS = 'REC' AND REC1.LATEST_REC_FLAG = 'Y' AND NVL(LGD.GL_DATE, TO_DATE( 2415021, 'J') ) = NVL(LGD2.GL_DATE, TO_DATE( 2415021, 'J') ) GROUP BY CTL.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID, REC1.GL_DATE, CTL.EXTENDED_AMOUNT, CTL.REVENUE_AMOUNT, CT.EXCHANGE_RATE ), PERCENT = (SELECT /*+ index(rec2 RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_N6) */ DECODE(LGD.ACCOUNT_CLASS || LGD.ACCOUNT_SET_FLAG, 'SUSPENSEN', LGD.PERCENT, 'UNBILLN', LGD.PERCENT, 'UNEARNN', LGD.PERCENT, NVL(LGD.PERCENT, 0) - ( SUM(NVL(LGD4.PERCENT, 0)) - DECODE(REC2.GL_DATE, NVL(LGD.GL_DATE, REC2.GL_DATE), 100, 0) ) ) FROM RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST LGD4, RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST REC2 WHERE LGD.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID = LGD4.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID AND REC2.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = LGD.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID AND REC2.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = LGD4.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID AND REC2.ACCOUNT_CLASS = 'REC' AND REC2.LATEST_REC_FLAG = 'Y' AND LGD4.ACCOUNT_SET_FLAG = LGD.ACCOUNT_SET_FLAG AND DECODE(LGD4.ACCOUNT_SET_FLAG, 'Y', LGD4.ACCOUNT_CLASS, LGD.ACCOUNT_CLASS) = LGD.ACCOUNT_CLASS AND NVL(LGD.GL_DATE, TO_DATE( 2415021, 'J') ) = NVL(LGD4.GL_DATE, TO_DATE( 2415021, 'J') ) GROUP BY REC2.GL_DATE, LGD.GL_DATE ), LAST_UPDATED_BY = :B1 , LAST_UPDATE_DATE = SYSDATE WHERE CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ID IN (SELECT /*+ index(rec3 RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_N6) */ MIN(DECODE(LGD3.GL_POSTED_DATE, NULL, LGD3.CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ID, NULL) ) FROM RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES CTL, RA_CUSTOMER_TRX T, RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST LGD3, RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST REC3 WHERE T.REQUEST_ID = :B5 AND T.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = CTL.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID AND (CTL.LINE_TYPE IN ( 'TAX','FREIGHT','CHARGES','SUSPENSE' ) OR (CTL.LINE_TYPE = 'LINE' AND CTL.ACCOUNTING_RULE_ID IS NULL )) AND LGD3.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID = CTL.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID AND LGD3.ACCOUNT_SET_FLAG = 'N' AND REC3.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = T.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID AND REC3.ACCOUNT_CLASS = 'REC' AND REC3.LATEST_REC_FLAG = 'Y' AND NVL(T.PREVIOUS_CUSTOMER_TRX_ID, -1) = DECODE(:B4 , 'INV', -1, 'REGULAR_CM', T.PREVIOUS_CUSTOMER_TRX_ID, NVL(T.PREVIOUS_CUSTOMER_TRX_ID, -1) ) GROUP BY CTL.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID, LGD3.GL_DATE, REC3.GL_DATE, CTL.EXTENDED_AMOUNT, CTL.REVENUE_AMOUNT, T.EXCHANGE_RATE HAVING ( SUM(NVL(LGD3.AMOUNT, 0)) <> CTL.EXTENDED_AMOUNT * DECODE(LGD3.GL_DATE, REC3.GL_DATE, 1, 0) OR SUM(NVL(LGD3.ACCTD_AMOUNT, 0)) <> DECODE(LGD3.GL_DATE, REC3.GL_DATE, 1, 0) * DECODE(:B2 , NULL, ROUND( CTL.EXTENDED_AMOUNT * NVL(T.EXCHANGE_RATE,1), :B3 ), ROUND( ( CTL.EXTENDED_AMOUNT * NVL(T.EXCHANGE_RATE,1) ) / :B2 ) * :B2 ) ) UNION SELECT /*+ index(rec5 RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_N6) INDEX (lgd5 ra_cust_trx_line_gl_dist_n6) index(ctl2 ra_customer_trx_lines_u1) */ TO_NUMBER( MIN(DECODE(LGD5.GL_POSTED_DATE||LGD5.ACCOUNT_CLASS|| LGD5.ACCOUNT_SET_FLAG, 'REVN', LGD5.CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ID, 'REVY', LGD5.CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ID, 'TAXN', LGD5.CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ID, 'TAXY', LGD5.CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ID, 'FREIGHTN', LGD5.CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ID, 'FREIGHTY', LGD5.CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ID, 'CHARGESN', LGD5.CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ID, 'CHARGESY', LGD5.CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ID, 'UNEARNY', LGD5.CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ID, 'UNBILLY', LGD5.CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ID, NULL ) ) ) FROM RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST LGD5, RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST REC5, RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES CTL2, RA_CUSTOMER_TRX T WHERE T.REQUEST_ID = :B5 AND T.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = REC5.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID AND CTL2.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID = LGD5.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID AND REC5.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = LGD5.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID AND REC5.ACCOUNT_CLASS = 'REC' AND REC5.LATEST_REC_FLAG = 'Y' AND (CTL2.LINE_TYPE IN ( 'TAX','FREIGHT','CHARGES','SUSPENSE') OR (CTL2.LINE_TYPE = 'LINE' AND (CTL2.ACCOUNTING_RULE_ID IS NULL OR LGD5.ACCOUNT_SET_FLAG = 'Y' ))) GROUP BY LGD5.CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID, LGD5.GL_DATE, REC5.GL_DATE, LGD5.ACCOUNT_SET_FLAG, DECODE(LGD5.ACCOUNT_SET_FLAG, 'N', NULL, LGD5.ACCOUNT_CLASS) HAVING SUM(NVL(LGD5.PERCENT, 0)) <> DECODE( NVL(LGD5.GL_DATE, REC5.GL_DATE), REC5.GL_DATE, 100, 0) )
I understand that this could be a seeded query but my attempt is to tune it.
Regards

Simple APD is taking too much time in running

Hi All,
We have one APD created on our developement system which is taking too much time in running.
This APD is fetching data from a Query having only 1200 records and directly putting into a master attribute.
The Query is running fine in RSRT transaction and giving output within 5 seconds but in APD if I do display data over Query it is taking too much time.
The APD is taking arrount 1.20 hours in running.
Thanks in advance!!

Hi,
When a query runs in APD it normally takes much, much longer than it takes in RSRT. Run times such as what you are saying (5secs in RSRT and >1.5 hrs in APD) are quite normal; I've seen them in some of my queries running for several hours in APD as well.
You just have to wait for it to complete.
Regards,
Suhas

Still the report is taking too much time

Hi All,
When i refresh a webi report the report is taken too much time to refresh(open).
In back end i have checked all the connections, contexts, cardinalities, joins, conditions...etc, in webi i have enabled the the check box 'query stripping'.
but still the report is taking too much time, i didn't identified the problem?
Please help me on this.
Thanks in advance..

Hi Mark,
How many queries are there--2
How many rows are returned--- 2000+
Are all measures defined with aggregates-- Yes
What is the array fetch size? (I1000 if it isn't already)

Report is taking too much time when running from parameter form

Dear All
I have developed report in oracle reports bulider 10g. while running it from report builder data is coming very fast.
But, If it is running from parameter form it is taking too much time to format report in PDF.
Please suggest any configuration or setting if anybody is having Idea.
Thanks

Hi,
The first thing to check is whether the query is running to completion in TOAD. By default, TOAD just selects the first 50 rows, where as Discoverer must return all the rows before displaying results if a crosstab report is used.
Secondly, check that the queries and the explain plans are the same in Discoverer and Toad. Although, Discoverer shows the SQL in the SQL inspector this isn't necessarily the SQL actually sent to the database. Use TOAD to interogate the Discoverer session to determine the actual SQL and compare this SQL and explain plan to SQL you ran in TOAD.
Thirdly, check that the session context is the same in both cases. So check that any custom contexts and the USER_ENV context is the same, and if any security packages or VPD policies are used in the SQL that these have been initialised the same.
If you still cannot determine the difference then trace both sessions.
Rod West

Creative Cloud is taking too much time to load and is not downloading the one month trial for Photoshop I just paid money for.

Creative Cloud is taking too much time to load and is not downloading the one month trial for Photoshop I just paid money for.

stop the download if it's stalled, and restart your download.

Hi from the last two days my iphone have very slow to open the apps and very slow when i check the notification window , it taking too much time to open when i tap to down . help me to resolve the issue.

Hi, from the last two days my iphone( iphone 4 with ios 5) have very slow to open the apps and very slow when i check the notification window , it taking too much time to open when i tap to down . help me to resolve the issue.

The Basic Troubleshooting Steps are:
Restart... Reset... Restore...
iPhone Reset
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1430
Try this First... You will Not Lose Any Data...
Turn the Phone Off...
Press and Hold the Sleep/Wake Button and the Home Button at the Same Time...
Wait for the Apple logo to Appear and then Disappear...
Usually takes about 15 - 20 Seconds... ( But can take Longer...)
Release the Buttons...
Turn the Phone On...
If that does not help... See Here:
Backing up, Updating and Restoring
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1414

Why it is taking too much time to kill the process?

Hi All,
Today,one of my user ran the calc script and the process is taking too much time, then i kill the process. I am wondering about one thing here even it is taking too long to kill the process, generally it will not take more than 2 sec. I did this through EAS.
After that I ran Maxl statement
alter system kill request 552599515;
there is no use at all.
Please reply if you have any solutions to kill this process.
Thanks in advance.
Ram.

Hi Ram,
1. Firstly, How much time does your calculation scripts normally run.
2. While it was running, you can go to the logs and monitor where exactly the script is taking time .
3. Sometimes, it does take time to cancel a transaction ( as it might be in between).
4. Maxl is always good to kill ,as you did . It should be succesful . Check the logs what it says ,and also the "sessions" which might say "terminating" and finish it off.
5. If nothing works ,and in the worst case scenarion , if its taking time without doing anything. Then log off all the users and stop the databas and start it .
6. Do log off all the users, so that you dont corrupt any filter related sec file.
Be very careful , if its production ( and I assume you have latest backups)
Sandeep Reddy Enti
HCC
http://hyperionconsultancy.com/

Taking too much time (1min) to connect to database

Hi,
I have oracle 10.2 and 10g application server.
Its taking too much time to connect to database through application (on browser). The connection through sqlplus is fine.
Please share your experience.
Regards,
Naseer

Dear AnaTech,
i am going to ask not related this question which already you answered i am going to ask you about that how to connect forms6i and Developer 10g with OracleAS.
i have installed and working Developer Suite 10g Ver. 10.1.2 and also Form Builder 6i. On my other machine i installed and working Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 and also on the database machine i installed Oracle Enterprise Manager 10g Application Server Control 10.1.2.0.2.
my database conectivity with Developer suite Forms and Reports and also Form6i and Reports6i are working fine. no problem.
now the 1 question of mine is that when i try to run form6i through run from web i got this error. FRM-99999: error 18121 occured see the release not.
this and the main question of mine is this that how can i control my OracleAS 10g with forms because basically the functionality of OracleAS is Mid-Tier but i am not utilizing the Mid-tier i am using here Two-tier Envrionment even i installed 3-Tier Environment so tell me how i utilize it with 3-Tier..
I hope you don't mind that i ask this question here and also if you give me you email then we can discuss this in detail and i can be helpful of your great expertise. i also know and utilize my 3-tier real envrionment.
Waiting for your great response.
Regards,
K.J.J.C

Full DTP taking too much time to load

Hi All ,
I am facing an issue where a DTP is taking too much time to load data from DSO to Cube via PC and also while manually running it.
There are 6 such similar DTP's which load data for different countries(different DSO's and Cubes as source and target respectively) for last 7 days based on GI Date. All the DTP's are pulling almost same no. of records and finish within 25-30 min. But only one DTP takes around 3 hours. The problem started couple of days back.
I have change the Parallel processes from 3->4->5 and packet size from 50,000->10,000->1.00.000 but no improvement. Also want to mention that all the source DSO's and target Cubes have the same structure. All the transformations have Field Routines and End Routines.
Can you all please share some pointers which can help.
Thanks
Prateek

HI Raman ,
This is what I get when I check the report. Can this be causing issues as 2 rows have % >= 100
ETVC0006           /BIC/DETVC00069     rows:      1.484    ratio:          0 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/DETVC0006C     rows: 15.059.600    ratio:        103 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/DETVC0006D     rows:        242    ratio:          0 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/DETVC0006P     rows:         66    ratio:          0 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/DETVC0006T     rows:        156    ratio:          0 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/DETVC0006U     rows:          2    ratio:          0 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/EETVC0006      rows: 14.680.700    ratio:        100 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/FETVC0006      rows:          0    ratio:          0 %
ETVC0007           rows: 13.939.200    density:              0,0 %

Procedure Taking too Much Time

Hi Guys,
I have package which contains number of function and procedure which is link with Oracle 's standard report called Prodction Shortage Report , it is taking too much time and even now days it is not finsih after three days.
So I am looking for some tuning steps which I can follow for all the queries one by one, I tried touse Explain Plan what it is showing not too much difference after movement of column from one location to another etc , even I have updated the existing indexes and also created new indexes.
Thanks
Shishu Paul

Shishu,
Is this report part of an Oracle product such as the Enterprise Business Suite (EBS)? If so, I recommend you create a Service Request (SR) with Oracle and have them tune the report. Doing your own tuning could cause you some support problems later on.
Just my two cents...
Craig

Report taking too much time in the portal

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for