Result cache invalidated

Hi,
Oracle version 11.2.0.1 on Linux
I understand thatt result cache (RC) invalidation is at table level.
I did a simple test:
create table customer (custno number, custname varchar2(30));
Table created.
insert into customer (custno,custname) values (1,'Customer_1');
insert INTO CUSTOMER (custno,custname) values (2,'Customer_X');
select * from customer;
    CUSTNO CUSTNAME
         1 Customer_1
         2 Customer_X
commit;
Commit complete.Now I invoke result cache here
select /*+ RESULT_CACHE */ * FROM customer where custno=1;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2844954298
| Id  | Operation          | Name                       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |                            |     1 |    30 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  RESULT CACHE      | ggb2vz6jcvcn5ajzqh406j3n85 |       |       |            |          |
|*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| CUSTOMER                   |     1 |    30 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - filter("CUSTNO"=1)
Result Cache Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - column-count=2; dependencies=(SCRATCHPAD.CUSTOMER); name="select /*+ RESULT_CACHE */ * FROM customer where custno=1"Invoke RC for second row query
select /*+ RESULT_CACHE */ * FROM customer where custno=2;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2844954298
| Id  | Operation          | Name                       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |                            |     1 |    30 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  RESULT CACHE      | fc8t6svvz6whh0gc8vcaxrh668 |       |       |            |          |
|*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| CUSTOMER                   |     1 |    30 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - filter("CUSTNO"=2)
Result Cache Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - column-count=2; dependencies=(SCRATCHPAD.CUSTOMER); name="select /*+ RESULT_CACHE */ * FROM customer where custno=2"OK they are stored as separate result cache
Now update the second row in that table in another session
update customer set custname ='Customer_2' where custno=2;
1 row updated.
commit;
Commit complete.Now query custno=2 from the first session
select /*+ RESULT_CACHE */ * FROM customer where custno=2;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2844954298
| Id  | Operation          | Name                       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |                            |     1 |    30 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  RESULT CACHE      | fc8t6svvz6whh0gc8vcaxrh668 |       |       |            |          |
|*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| CUSTOMER                   |     1 |    30 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - filter("CUSTNO"=2)
Result Cache Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - column-count=2; dependencies=(SCRATCHPAD.CUSTOMER); name="select /*+ RESULT_CACHE */ * FROM customer where custno=2"The same result cache reference is still there. So does this mean that result cache is NOT invalidated despite the row being updated or I am doing something wrong here?
Thanks
Edited by: 902986 on 12-Feb-2012 13:26

The result cache id is a hash value for the query so that Oracle can later tell if a query will produce a result set that is already in the cache.
When you updated the table the result set in the cache was marked invalid. Then you ran the same query for record 2 and Oracle created a hash value for the query and the hash value is the same as the first time since the query is the same; that is, the query itself hashes to the same value. But the result cache contents for that query have changed and replace the old invalid contents.
If you query the result set cache you will get the new value not the old one since the old result set for your second query isn't there anymore.

Similar Messages

  • Oracle 11g Result Cache

    Hi,
    I have read that there is SGA component called Result Cache. According to documentation:
    The result cache buffers query results. If a query is run that
    already has results in the result cache, the database returns
    results from the result cache instead of rerunning the query. This
    speeds up the execution of frequently run queries.
    What happens when data in tables which are called by the query change. I think the old data still will be in cache and I always get the old data.
    Peter D.

    Hi Peter
    What happens when data in tables which are called by
    the query change. I think the old data still will be in
    cache and I always get the old data.The server result cache can return old data only for distributed queries (i.e. queries also retrieving data from other databases).
    All local queries return the correct data. To do so, the cache entries are invalidated as required.
    HTH
    Chris Antognini
    Author of Troubleshooting Oracle Performance, Apress 2008 (http://top.antognini.ch)

  • Result cache doubt

    what is the difference if i write relies_on clause or if i dont write it, technically please explain what exactly is the difference ??
    create or replace function tax (i in varchar2)
    return number
    result_cache
    is
    begin
    return i*0.08 ;
    end;
    create or replace function tax (i in varchar2)
    return number
    result_cache relies_on (emp)
    is
    begin
    return i*0.08 ;
    end;

    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28370/function.htm#i34368
    RELIES_ON
    Specifies the data sources on which the results of a function depend. For more information, see Using the PL/SQL Function Result Cache. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28370/subprograms.htm#BABFHACJ
    To enable result-caching for a function, use the RESULT_CACHE clause. When a result-cached function is invoked, the system checks the cache. If the cache contains the result from a previous call to the function with the same parameter values, the system returns the cached result to the invoker and does not reexecute the function body. If the cache does not contain the result, the system executes the function body and adds the result (for these parameter values) to the cache before returning control to the invoker.Not sure why are you talking about invalidated data, result_cache just invoked result from a previous call to the function if it exists, if not it executes the function body.
    The clause relies_on just specifies the data sources on which the results of a function depend.
    am i missing something??

  • How to trigger DSP cache invalidation and reload?

    We have a scheduled job to update the database nightly. I used DSP caching to increase performance since the data only changes during the nightly updates.
    Does anyone know how can I trigger the DSP cache invalidation and reload the updated data to DSP cache once the data loading is completed on the database server? (The database is hosted on a different server than DSP.)
    Thanks in advance!
    Nav

    On this page
    http://e-docs.bea.com/aldsp/docs25/appdev/ejbclt.html
    Bypassing the Data Cache When Using the Mediator API
    Data retrieved by data service functions can be cached for quick access. This is known as a data caching. (See Configuring the Query Results Cache, in the DSP Administration Guide for details.) Assuming the data changes infrequently, it's likely that you'll want to use the cache capability.
    You can bypass the data cache by passing the GET_CURRENT_DATA attribute within a function call, as shown in Listing 3-7. GET_CURRENT_DATA returns a Boolean value. As a by-product, the cache is also refreshed.
    Listing 3-7 Cache Bypass Example When Using Mediator API
    dataServices.customermanagement.CustomerProfile customerProfileDS =
    customerDS=dataServices.customermanagement.CustomerProfile.getInstance(ctx,appName);RequestConfig
    config = new
    RequestConfig();attr.enableFeature(RequestConfig.GET_CURRENT_DATA);CustomerProfileDocument
    customerProfileDoc customerPlofileDS.CustomerProfile(params,config);

  • Query result caching on oracle 9 and 10 vs indexing

    I am trying to improve performance on oracle 9i and 10g.
    We use some queries that take up to 30 minutes to execute.
    I heard that there are some products to cache query results.
    Would this have any advantage over using indexes or materialized views?
    Does anyone know any products that I can use to cache the results of this queries on disk?
    Personally I think that by using the query result caching I would reduce the cpu time needed to process the query.
    Is this true?

    Your message post pushes all the wrong buttons starting with the fact that 9i and 10g are marketing labels not version numbers.
    You don't tune queries by spending money and throwing resources at them. You tune them by identifying the problem queries, running explain plans, visualizing their output using DBMS_XPLAN, and addressing the root cause.
    If you want help post full version numbers, the SQL statements, and the DBMS_XPLAN outputs.

  • Oracle 11g result cache and TimesTen

    Oracle 11g has introduced the concept of result cache whereby the result set of frequently executed queries are stored in cache and used later when other users request the same query. This is different from caching the data blocks and exceuting the query over and over again.
    Tom Kyte calls this just-in-time materialized view whereby the results are dynamically evaluated without DBA intervention
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/07-sep/o57asktom.html
    My point is that in view of utilities like result_cache and possible use of Solid State Disks in Oracle to speed up physical I/O etc is there any need for a product like TimesTen? It sounds to me that it may just asdd another layer of complexity?

    Oracle result cache ia a useful tool but it is distinctly different from TimesTen. My understanding of Oracle's result cache is caching results set for seldom changing data like look up tables (currencies ID/code), reference data that does not change often (list of counter parties) etc. It would be pointless for caching result set where the underlying data changes frequently.
    There is also another argument for SQL result cache in that if you are hitting high on your use of CPUs and you have enough of memory then you can cache some of the results set thus saving on your CPU cycles.
    Considering the arguments about hard wired RDBMS and Solid State Disks (SSD), we can talk about it all day but having SSD does not eliminate the optimiser consideration for physical I/O. A table scan is a table scan whether data resides on SCSI or SSD disk. SSD will be faster but we are still performing physical IOs.
    With regard to TimesTen, the product positioning is different. TimesTen is closer to middletier than Oracle. It is designed to work closely to application layer whereas Oracle has much wider purpose. For real time response and moderate volumes there is no way one can substitue TimesTen with any hard wired RDBMS. The request for result cache has been around for sometime. In areas like program trading and market data where the underlying data changes rapidly, TimesTen will come very handy as the data is real time/transient and the calculations have to be done almost realtime, with least complications from the execution engine. I fail to see how one can deploy result cache in this scenario. Because of the underlying change of data, Oracle will be forced to calculate the queries almost everytime and the result cache will be just wasted.
    Hope this helps,
    Mich

  • Oracle 11g/R2 Query Result Cache - Incremental Update

    Hi,
    In Oracle 11g/R2, I created replica of HR.Employees table & executed the following statement (+Although using SUM() function is non-logical in this case, but just testifying the result+)
    STEP - 1
    SELECT      /+ RESULT_CACHE */ employee_id, first_name, last_name, SUM(salary)*
    FROM           HR.Employees_copy
    WHERE      department_id = 20
    GROUP BY      employee_id, first_name, last_name;
    EMPLOYEE_ID      FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME     SUM(SALARY)
    202           Pat           Fay          6000
    201           Michael           Hartstein     13000
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3837552314
    | Id | Operation           | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT      | | 2 | 130 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    | 1 | RESULT CACHE      | 3acbj133x8qkq8f8m7zm0br3mu | | | | |
    | 2 | HASH GROUP BY      | | 2 | 130 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL     | EMPLOYEES_COPY | 2 | 130 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------     Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    0 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    *690* bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    416 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    2 rows processed
    STEP - 2
    INSERT INTO HR.employees_copy
    VALUES(200, 'Dummy', 'User','[email protected]',NULL, sysdate, 'MANAGER',5000, NULL,NULL,20);
    STEP - 3
    SELECT      /*+ RESULT_CACHE */ employee_id, first_name, last_name, SUM(salary)
    FROM           HR.Employees_copy
    WHERE      department_id = 20
    GROUP BY      employee_id, first_name, last_name;
    EMPLOYEE_ID      FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME SUM(SALARY)
    202      Pat      Fay      6000
    201      Michael      Hartstein      13000
    200      Dummy User      5000
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3837552314
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT |          | 3 | 195 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    | 1 | RESULT CACHE | 3acbj133x8qkq8f8m7zm0br3mu | | | | |
    | 2 | HASH GROUP BY | | 3 | 195 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMPLOYEES_COPY | 3 | 195 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
         Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    4 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    *714* bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    416 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    3 rows processed
    In the execution plan of STEP-3, against ID-1 the operation RESULT CACHE is shown which shows the result has been retrieved directly from Result cache. Does this mean that Oracle Server has Incrementally Retrieved the resultset?
    Because, before the execution of STEP-2, the cache contained only 2 records. Then 1 record was inserted but after STEP-3, a total of 3 records was returned from cache. Does this mean that newly inserted row is retrieved from database and merged to the cached result of STEP-1?
    If Oracle server has incrementally retrieved and merged newly inserted record, what mechanism is being used by the Oracle to do so?
    Regards,
    Wasif
    Edited by: 965300 on Oct 15, 2012 12:25 AM

    965300 wrote:
    Hi,
    In Oracle 11g/R2, I created replica of HR.Employees table & executed the following statement (+Although using SUM() function is non-logical in this case, but just testifying the result+)
    STEP - 1
    SELECT      /+ RESULT_CACHE */ employee_id, first_name, last_name, SUM(salary)*
    FROM           HR.Employees_copy
    WHERE      department_id = 20
    GROUP BY      employee_id, first_name, last_name;
    EMPLOYEE_ID      FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME     SUM(SALARY)
    202           Pat           Fay          6000
    201           Michael           Hartstein     13000
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3837552314
    | Id | Operation           | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT      | | 2 | 130 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    | 1 | RESULT CACHE      | 3acbj133x8qkq8f8m7zm0br3mu | | | | |
    | 2 | HASH GROUP BY      | | 2 | 130 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL     | EMPLOYEES_COPY | 2 | 130 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------     Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    0 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    *690* bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    416 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    2 rows processed
    STEP - 2
    INSERT INTO HR.employees_copy
    VALUES(200, 'Dummy', 'User','[email protected]',NULL, sysdate, 'MANAGER',5000, NULL,NULL,20);
    STEP - 3
    SELECT      /*+ RESULT_CACHE */ employee_id, first_name, last_name, SUM(salary)
    FROM           HR.Employees_copy
    WHERE      department_id = 20
    GROUP BY      employee_id, first_name, last_name;
    EMPLOYEE_ID      FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME SUM(SALARY)
    202      Pat      Fay      6000
    201      Michael      Hartstein      13000
    200      Dummy User      5000
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3837552314
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT |          | 3 | 195 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    | 1 | RESULT CACHE | 3acbj133x8qkq8f8m7zm0br3mu | | | | |
    | 2 | HASH GROUP BY | | 3 | 195 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMPLOYEES_COPY | 3 | 195 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
         Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    4 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    *714* bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    416 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    3 rows processed
    In the execution plan of STEP-3, against ID-1 the operation RESULT CACHE is shown which shows the result has been retrieved directly from Result cache. Does this mean that Oracle Server has Incrementally Retrieved the resultset?
    Because, before the execution of STEP-2, the cache contained only 2 records. Then 1 record was inserted but after STEP-3, a total of 3 records was returned from cache. Does this mean that newly inserted row is retrieved from database and merged to the cached result of STEP-1?
    If Oracle server has incrementally retrieved and merged newly inserted record, what mechanism is being used by the Oracle to do so?
    Regards,
    Wasif
    Edited by: 965300 on Oct 15, 2012 12:25 AMNo, the RESULT CACHE operation doesn't necessarily mean that the results are retrieved from there. It could be being
    written to there.
    Look at the number of consistent gets: it's zero in the first step (I assume you had already run this query before) and I would
    conclude that the data is being read from the result cache.
    In the third step there are 4 consistent gets. I would conclude that the data is being written to the result cache, a fourth step repeating
    the SQL should show zero consistent gets and that would be the results being read.

  • WD Java RFC metadata cache invalidation without recycle JAVA

    Since we are in a high availability production system, we cannot recycle or CE instance. There are times were the RFC metdata invalidation does not work and the only things that forces it is a recycle of the CE system.
    This is contrary to what SAP has publicized, so is there a process in NWA or a single process (and NOT the server0 process) that we can refresh without stopping and starting the java engine.
    Much like Visual Administration is there a single service we can stop and start to ensure the engine stays up and running and available?
    Thanks
    Weyland Yutani

    Hi Weyland ,
    did you check the guide ?
    Metadata Cache Invalidation for Adaptive RFC Models
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10465350-b4f5-2910-61ba-a58282b3b6df
    There's a solution in this guide which explains how to proceed to avoid engine restart in case of ARFC.
    (I don't know your engine release, but if it is >= 711, then you may welcome this guide as well:
    Using an Adaptive RFC 2 Model in Web Dynpro Java
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/50f7192d-2808-2d10-189b-df3fa5f71abf )
    I hope this helps.
    Best Regards,
    Ervin

  • Function result Cache in oracle 11G

    Hi,
    i am reading the following article and trying to reproduce same set of statements to learn about function result cache.
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/07-sep/o57asktom.html
    Details about my output:
    SQL> create or replace
    function not_cached
    ( p_owner in varchar2 )
    return number
    as
    l_cnt number;
    begin
    select count(*)
    into l_cnt
    from t
    where owner = p_owner;
    sys.dbms_lock.sleep(1);
    return l_cnt;
    end;
    Function created.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.13
    SQL> create or replace
    function cached
    ( p_owner in varchar2 )
    return number
    result_cache
    relies_on(T)
    as
    l_cnt number;
    begin
    select count(*)
    into l_cnt
    from t
    where owner = p_owner;
    dbms_lock.sleep(1);
    return l_cnt;
    end;
    Function created.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.08
    SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( not_cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.06
    SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( not_cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.01
    SQL> SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( not_cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.02
    SQL> SQL> set serveroutput on
    SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( not_cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    0
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.02
    SQL> SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    0
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.02
    SQL> SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    0
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.02
    SQL> SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    0
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    0
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.01
    I am supposed to get the results quickly for "cached" call. However, i still dont see any change in the response time. May i know what i am missing here?
    Thank you
    Giridhar

    Try to play with
    RESULT_CACHE_MAX_SIZE
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28320/initparams206.htm#REFRN10272
    RESULT_CACHE_MAX_RESULT
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28320/initparams205.htm#REFRN10298

  • Production use of the Result Cache area

    Hi all,
       OS.......: OEL 6.3 (x86_64)
       DB.......: Oracle 11.2.0.3 (x86_64)
       I would like to know from those who have used the Result Cache massively in production environments... just to know the opinion of the ones who have used this "for real". Did you use it proactively, to solve a specific problem? Or in every new database created, you configure this memory area? Did it really work as it should be?
       Thanks in advance.

    Hi Fabricio,
    We run result cache in our live forecast system on 11.2.0.2. We have result_cache_mode set to force and a cache of 20MB. The performance improvement we get with this is incredible, from a server running flat out to a server that looks like it's hardly doing anything. Of course it depends on exactly how your app works but we've seen no issues with it other than occassional waits for the result cache latch when there are a large number of requests - but even when this happens it's still way faster than running without result cache.
    Cheers,
    Harry

  • Using the Client Result Cache

    Hello everyone,
    I have a question regarding the use of the client result cache but first of all here are the informations about my database:
    SQL> SELECT * FROM v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    CORE    11.2.0.1.0    Production
    TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    I have installed the Oracle Client Tools on my clientmachine. It has a tnsnames.ora like this:
    ORCL =
      (DESCRIPTION =
        (ADDRESS_LIST =
          (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = FEA11-119SRV)(PORT = 1521))
        (CONNECT_DATA =
          (SERVICE_NAME = orcl.local)
    The Client Result Cache is configured in the sqlnet.ora.
    ADR_BASE = /u01/app/oracle
    OCI_RESULT_CACHE_MAX_SIZE= 2048000
    OCI_RESULT_CACHE_MAX_RSET_SIZE = 1024000
    NAMES.DIRECTORY_PATH = (EZCONNECT, TNSNAMES, HOSTNAME)
    The Databaseserver is configured like that:
    SQL> col name format a30
    SQL> col value format a30
    SQL> SELECT name, value
      2  FROM   v$system_parameter
      3  WHERE  name LIKE '%result_cache%';
    NAME                   VALUE
    result_cache_mode           MANUAL
    result_cache_max_size           0
    result_cache_max_result        5
    result_cache_remote_expiration 0
    client_result_cache_size       1073741824
    client_result_cache_lag        3000
    After configuring client an server I try the followign SQL-Statement on the clientmachine:
    sqlplus oracle/password@orcl
    set autotrace traceonly explain
    SELECT /*+ result_cache */ *
    FROM testtable;
    SQL
    The execution plan show two operations: "SELECT STATEMENT" and "TABLE ACCESS FULL" but no the "RESULT CACHE" operation.
    Did I miss something?
    Any help would be appreciated
    Florian W.

    result_cache_max_size           0
    That means the result cache is disabled. You need to set it to a non-zero value. That is the maximum ammount of memory, in bytes, the database will allocate on the shared pool to dedicate it to the result cache for all requests.
    By the way, OCI_RESULT_CACHE_MAX_SIZE is optional. By default the sessions will have the maximum size they can occupy on the cache determined by CLIENT_RESULT_CACHE parameter, the client (OCI) side parameters override that.
    result_cache_mode           MANUAL
    Another thing to consider is RESULT_CACHE_MODE in MANUAL, that will cause only the statements with the RESULT_CACHE hint on it to be cached on the result cache. You can also set result cache to mode FORCE on specific tables with alter table command.
    Regards

  • SQL Result Cache  vs In-Memory Database Cache

    Hi,
    can anyone help me to understand the relations and differences between the 11 g new features of SQL Result Cache vs In-Memory Database Cache ?
    Thanks

    I highly recommend you read the 11g New Features Guide. Here is a sample from it:
    h4. 1.11.2.9 Query Result Cache
    A separate shared memory pool is now used for storing and retrieving
    cached results. Query retrieval from the query result cache is faster
    than rerunning the query. Frequently executed queries will see
    performance improvements when using the query result cache.
    The new query result cache enables explicit caching of results in
    database memory. Subsequent queries using the cached results will
    experience significant performance improvements.
    See Also:
    [Oracle Database Performance Tuning Guide|http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28274/memory.htm#PFGRF10121] for details
    [Results Cache Concepts|http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28274/memory.htm#PFGRF10121|Results Cache Concepts]
    HTH!

  • Result Cache in oracle 11g release 2.0.2.0

    All,
    Few months back I was trying Result Cache feature of 11g release 2.0.1.0. That time oracle mentioned that they have 3 modes to use this feature by setting result_cache_mode paramter to AUTO, FORCE or MANUAL. With AUTO mode (result_cache_mode=AUTO) you can identify queries that may benefit from result cache. I would like to know whcih views or function I should see where it captures this information.
    In 11.2.0.1.0 documentation it was referencing some views (I totally don't remember those views names) and said those will be available in 11.2.0.2.0.
    Is anyone know about this?
    Thanks in advance.

    user2486753 wrote:
    Though oracle doc doesn't say about AUTO it is still accepts that value and caches the result of the SQL query if you add /*+ result cache */ hint to the SQL.
    I know that they did mentioned in 112010 some where that it will help users to find which SQL's are good candidates for caching by running the application for a while. I just couldn't fine it.If we are adding AUTO and still passing the hint, its the same behavior as like MANUAL. I am not sure that I have seen the value anywhere and neither its there in the docs too.
    HTH
    Aman....

  • Oracle result cache and functions

    Hi All,
    I am on 11.2 in Linux.
    I want to use Oracle's result cache to cache results of (user defined) functions, which we use in SELECT commands.
    My question is, does result caching work for deterministic and non-deterministic functions ?
    Just curious, how Oracle keeps track of changes being made which affect a function's return value?
    Thoughts please.
    Thanks in advance

    I want to ... cache results of (user defined) functions, which we use in SELECT commands.You have four choices:
    1. Subquery caching - (wrap function call in SELECT) useful for repeated function calls in a single SELECT
    2. Marking function as DETERMINISTIC - inconsistent results across versions, deterministic best reserved for function-based indexes only
    3. Result Cache
    4. Move function logic out of function and inline to the main SQL statement.
    The biggest downside of any function call that is inline to SQL is that it bypasses the read consistency mechanism, actually that's probably the second biggest downside. The biggest downside is normally that their misuse kills performance.
    If your function itself contains SQL then you should seriously reconsider whether you should be using a function.
    does result caching work for deterministic and non-deterministic functions ?Result cache knows nothing about determinism so yes it should be applied regardless.
    Oracle keeps track of changes being made which affect a function's return value?See v$result_cache_dependency.
    The mechanism is very blunt, there is no fine-grained tracking of data changes that may affect your result.
    It's as simple as function F1 relies on table T1. If the data in table T1 changes, invalidate the results in the result cache for F1.

  • If sga_target set explicitly, result cache become disabled

    hi all,
    I am using 11g R2 and automatic memory management. I realized something. if I explicitly declare sga_target parameter in parameter file, result cache become disabled.
    as you know if you use automatic memory management, sga_target is set to 0 automatically already but if I write that to the parameter file than whatever I set for result_cache_max_size parameter, instance always opens with result_cache_max_size=0 (I saw that in alert log).
    is there any reason for that ?
    here is my pfile contents.
    orcl.__db_cache_size=922746880
    orcl.__java_pool_size=33554432
    orcl.__large_pool_size=16777216
    orcl.__oracle_base='C:\app\paranoyakX'#ORACLE_BASE set from environment
    orcl.__pga_aggregate_target=838860800
    orcl.__sga_target=1258291200
    orcl.__shared_io_pool_size=0
    orcl.__shared_pool_size=251658240
    orcl.__streams_pool_size=16777216
    *.audit_file_dest='C:\app\paranoyakX\admin\orcl\adump'
    *.audit_trail='DB_EXTENDED'
    *.compatible='11.2.0.0.0'
    *.control_files='C:\app\paranoyakX\oradata\orcl\control01.ctl','C:\app\paranoyakX\flash_recovery_area\orcl\control02.ctl'
    *.db_16k_cache_size=0
    *.db_4k_cache_size=0
    *.db_block_size=8192
    *.db_domain='oracle.com'
    *.db_flashback_retention_target=1000
    *.db_keep_cache_size=0
    *.db_name='orcl'
    *.db_recovery_file_dest='C:\app\paranoyakX\flash_recovery_area'
    *.db_recovery_file_dest_size=10737418240
    *.diagnostic_dest='C:\app\paranoyakX'
    *.dispatchers='(PROTOCOL=TCP) (SERVICE=orclXDB)'
    *.memory_max_target=34359738368
    *.memory_target=2097152000
    *.nls_language='TURKISH'
    *.nls_territory='TURKEY'
    *.open_cursors=300
    *.pga_aggregate_target=528482304
    *.processes=150
    *.remote_login_passwordfile='EXCLUSIVE'
    *.resource_limit=TRUE
    *.undo_tablespace='UNDOTBS1'
    *.result_cache_max_size=5000000
    *.sga_target=0

    I would suggest that you pay more attention to documentation and don't jump to conclusion in a haste. Just because the parameter result_cache_max_size is set to 0, it does not mean that the result cache in itself is disabled. This is the maximum size of the result cache. See below,
    [oracle@edbar2p0-orcl ~]$ sqlplus / as sysdba
    SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.1.0 Production on Thu Jul 14 08:35:00 2011
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
    Connected to:
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning, Automatic Storage Management, OLAP, Data Mining
    and Real Application Testing options
    SQL> sho parameter result
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    client_result_cache_lag              big integer 3000
    client_result_cache_size             big integer 0
    result_cache_max_result              integer     5
    result_cache_max_size                big integer 1184K
    result_cache_mode                    string      MANUAL
    result_cache_remote_expiration       integer     0
    SQL> show parameter sga
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    lock_sga                             boolean     FALSE
    pre_page_sga                         boolean     FALSE
    sga_max_size                         big integer 460M
    sga_target                           big integer 0
    SQL> set autot trace exp
    selSQL> ect /*+ result_cache */ * from scott.dept;
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3383998547
    | Id  | Operation          | Name                       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (
    %CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |                            |     4 |    80 |     3
      (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   1 |  RESULT CACHE      | 1c13q1afp56bq0jpnmysvywx7g |       |       |
         |          |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| DEPT                       |     4 |    80 |     3
      (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Result Cache Information (identified by operation id):
       1 - column-count=3; dependencies=(SCOTT.DEPT); name="select /*+ result_cache
    */ * from scott.dept"
    SQL> exit
    Disconnected from Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning, Automatic Storage Management, OLAP, Data Mining
    and Real Application Testing optionsThe value for the result_cache parameter is automatically set by oracle depending on either you have Memory_target/SGA_TARGET or Shared_Pool parameter set. Please see oracle documentation for more information.
    HTH
    Aman....

Maybe you are looking for

  • Windows will not recognize ipod touch also says it has malfunctioned

    hi whenever i plug in my ipod touch i get a message saying that "usb device not recognized, one of the usb drives attached has malfunctioned and windows cannot recognize it" i have reinstalled itunes 8.1 twice the second time i reinstalled the apple

  • Help me with Hp Probook 4515s, xin giúp tôi (Vietnamese)

    Hi everybody! (Sorry with my English) Tôi đã cài Archlinux x86_64 trên máy tính xách tay Hp Probook 4515s của tôi. Sau khi cài xong, khởi động lại thì máy tính bị treo. Tôi cũng đã thử với OpenSUSE và Debian, thì thấy vấn đề ở Ethernet card (Marvell)

  • IE crash and closed down when trying to include a PDF file into a web page

    Hi, I am trying to include pdf file into my webpage by using tag. The whole page is created dynamically on the run-time. I am using IFrame to contain all the controls (included the object). The system works fine in the WindowXP but when I run it unde

  • UIM Installation in MS (VM 2) fails as it searches for files in AS (VM 1)

    Dear Gurus, Scenario: For UIM installation, 2 Virtual Machines (VM 1 & VM 2) with no shared disk given. VM 1 hosts Admin Server (AS) & Manage Server (MS). After creation of domain, the directory structure is copied from VM 1 to VM 2. Ran the UIM Inst

  • Recent problem with Illustrator CS5

    I don't know if there is a solution out there to this, I have searched and haven't found it. What happens is this: My move tool and open arrow tool duplicate what is being moved as well as move it My geometry (rectangle, ellipse, etc.) and line tools