RFEBBECODA00: rounding calculation problem
Hi there,
I'm running program RFEBBECODA00 vi transaction FEBC but for one account in OMR (defined with 3 decimals in TCURX), SAP seems to calculate the ending balance based on amounts with 2 decimals whereas the bank statement has actually amounts with 3 decimals. Because "Calculated ending bal. <> statement" is with 0.01 difference during RFEBBECODA00 execution and, then the conversion is not done.
Do we have to force this amount via user exit FEB00002 or is there any else solution ?
Thanks for your help,
Rgds,
Phil
Hi john,
first of all I would like to say thanks for responce,when I am exporting all data from this Database in middle it is going to freaz every time from past 2 months before that there is no problem like this so i that it has some in DB .I have expoted level0data then deleted all data from DB then loaded level0data after this ran CALCall
Please give any suggestion
regards,
Prabhakar
Similar Messages
-
How do I round calculations to two decimal places (form-wide)
Hi,
I've created an order form where customers input the quantity of product they want to order and the form outputs the total due (including shipping and sales tax). Depending on user input, the resulting total sometimes contains more than two decimal places. How do I round calculations to two decimal places? Is there a way to do this form-wide?
I'm new at using Acrobat for calculations. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks...The above will affect the displayed value not the actual value of the field nor its value when accessed in another computation. This behavior may cause an error of 1 cent or more in the grand total or sales tax computation. If you want the the value and displayed value to be the same value you can use the following Validation script:
event.value = util.scand("%,1 0.2f", event.value); -
When I try to sign into my iCloud.i get a massage saying that The maximum number of free accounts has been activated on this I pad. Please can you tell me how to get round this problem ?
All you can do is re-use on of the accounts previously created on your device, or create an account to use on another iOS device or Mac (running OS X 10.7.2 or later), if you have one.
-
Hi all, I'm having a problem with a form that I've created in Adobe LiveCycle designer. I've uploaded the form to the Acrobat.com site (https://acrobat.com/#d=OTqg07-glxa3jkGWUGssVA)
My problem is that the "Sub-Total Salary & Wages) table won't calculate when an add.Instance button is selected. Could some you wonderful experts out there take a look at the form and tell me what I've done wrong?
Thanks so much for your assistance.
ConnieI don't think it's rounding. Otherwise, none of my time calculations would match. Most of them do, but unfortunately, not all of them do.
Also, when I look at the seconds on the lines that don't match, they don't round up (Example: 466.9722222 is rounded to 466.97).
I even changed my calculation to see if that was it. I get the same results.
The new calc I tried:
IIf((Sum(AWDB_Q_Agent_Skill_Group_Half_Hour!CallsHandledToHalf))>0,
(Format(Int(((Sum(AWDB_Q_Agent_Skill_Group_Half_Hour!HandledCallsTimeToHalf))/(Sum(AWDB_Q_Agent_Skill_Group_Half_Hour!CallsHandledToHalf)))/3600),"00") & ":" & Format(Int((((Sum(AWDB_Q_Agent_Skill_Group_Half_Hour!HandledCallsTimeToHalf))/(Sum(AWDB_Q_Agent_Skill_Group_Half_Hour!CallsHandledToHalf)))-(Int(((Sum(AWDB_Q_Agent_Skill_Group_Half_Hour!HandledCallsTimeToHalf))/(Sum(AWDB_Q_Agent_Skill_Group_Half_Hour!CallsHandledToHalf)))/3600)*3600))/60),"00") & ":" & Format(((((Sum(AWDB_Q_Agent_Skill_Group_Half_Hour!HandledCallsTimeToHalf))/(Sum(AWDB_Q_Agent_Skill_Group_Half_Hour!CallsHandledToHalf))) Mod 60)),"00")),"00:00:00") -
Rounding calculation in TM_51/TM_52
Hi colleagues:
I have a problem when using transaction TM_51/TM_52 for creating/change one Interest Rate related to the calculation and rounding procedures.
Base in the following model it is possible to get a clear view of the problem:
Base amount (item) for interest calculation = 50000 Euros
Number items = 15
Total amount = 750.000 Euros
Interest Rate 4,317%
Annual base for calculation = 360 days
Period for calculation = 92 days
SAP Calculation = 4,317 * 750.000 * 92 / 360 --> Result = 8.247,250 Euros
Required calculation = 4,317 * 50.000 * 92/360 * 15 --> Result = 8.274,30 Euros
As you can see the difference is the rounding procedure and in the calculation process.
Please there is anyone that could help me?. I did not find anything about this issue in the SAP Notes and in the forums.
I will appreciate so much any kind of help
Best Regards
JoséHi Ravi,
I have done the settings as per your suggession. But still now it is not calculating with rounding off value.
I am calculating the interest by T.Code FINT.
Could you please suggest me is there any other configuration..
Thanks
Aswin -
Income Tax Calculation problem: Urgent Help Needed
Dear Gurus,
I am facing a unique problem. Our client has two incentives
1) Product Incentive
2) Sales Incentive
Every month incentive figures get changed. These two are Monthly Regular Income (Cumulations Class 24) i.e. included in annual tax calculation.
Now for tax calculation, my client wants "Actual Earning" and "Estimated Earning for the rest of the year" to be different. But Income tax calculation in SAP (for the month of April 2007) takes Actual Earning and multiplied it by 12( i.e. 11+1) to calculate Estimated Earning. But my client wants this Estimated Earning to be different.
Now please let me know is this possible in SAP system and how to calculate this?
Your help will be highly appreciated
Waiting for an early reply.
Thanking You,
With Best Regards,
PratikHi,
I am not understand your problem give your mb then i talk to you
mhpo -
Sale Analysis Profit Calculation problem
Hello
I create sale Invoice having Qty 2 unit price 150 & tax code is VAT@4% then Base amount is 300 & Total Bill
amt is 312.
My purchase price for the same item is INR 100 so my Gross profit show on Bill is INR 100 & profit percent
is 33.33%
Customer will debit with INR 312
But when Create Rate difference bill ie credit memo of INR 20 per uint ie Qty 2 Tax VAT@4% (maintain
drop ship warehouse in row level to can't reduce the qty)
Customer will debit -41.60
So Customer Debit balance is 270.40
But when I run Sale analysis report the result shows that Gross profit INR 260 & Gross Profit % is 100%
But actually i calculated manually the real Profit is INR 60 & Profit % should be 23.08 should be show in sale
analysis
So what i do to see the same resultHi
There is some problem in sales analysis report in some of the sap versions. Refer the following documents.
[https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361706E6F7465735F6E756D6265723D3030303130313637303426]
[https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361706E6F7465735F6E756D6265723D3135383735363826]
[https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361706E6F7465735F6E756D6265723D3136363835363426]
Regards,
Sudhir B. -
Large numbers calculation problem (determinant calculation)
Hello experts,
I have really interesting problem. I am calculatig determinant in ABAP with a large numbers (in CRM 5.0 system).
My formula for determinant is :
FORM calculate_determinant USING det TYPE zsppo_determinant
CHANGING value TYPE f .
value =
( 1 * det-a11 * det-a22 * det-a33 * det-a44 ) + ( -1 * det-a11 * det-a22 * det-a34 * det-a43 ) +
( -1 * det-a11 * det-a23 * det-a32 * det-a44 ) + ( 1 * det-a11 * det-a23 * det-a34 * det-a42 ) +
( -1 * det-a11 * det-a24 * det-a33 * det-a42 ) + ( 1 * det-a11 * det-a24 * det-a32 * det-a43 ) +
( -1 * det-a12 * det-a21 * det-a33 * det-a44 ) + ( 1 * det-a12 * det-a21 * det-a34 * det-a43 ) +
( 1 * det-a12 * det-a23 * det-a31 * det-a44 ) + ( -1 * det-a12 * det-a23 * det-a34 * det-a41 ) +
( -1 * det-a12 * det-a24 * det-a31 * det-a43 ) + ( 1 * det-a12 * det-a24 * det-a33 * det-a41 ) +
( 1 * det-a13 * det-a21 * det-a32 * det-a44 ) + ( -1 * det-a13 * det-a21 * det-a34 * det-a42 ) +
( -1 * det-a13 * det-a22 * det-a31 * det-a44 ) + ( 1 * det-a13 * det-a22 * det-a34 * det-a41 ) +
( 1 * det-a13 * det-a24 * det-a31 * det-a42 ) + ( -1 * det-a13 * det-a24 * det-a32 * det-a41 ) +
( -1 * det-a14 * det-a21 * det-a32 * det-a43 ) + ( 1 * det-a14 * det-a21 * det-a33 * det-a42 ) +
( 1 * det-a14 * det-a22 * det-a31 * det-a43 ) + ( -1 * det-a14 * det-a22 * det-a33 * det-a41 ) +
( -1 * det-a14 * det-a23 * det-a31 * det-a42 ) + ( 1 * det-a14 * det-a23 * det-a32 * det-a41 )
ENDFORM.
Det values are also f type. Problem is, that for several numbers I got the right values and for another det values I got wrong values... I also try to retype variable value on type p, but without success. Maybe I used wrong types or there is some ABAP rounding of numbers which cause wrong result.
Any good ideas of solutions. <text removed>. Thanks for your time.
Edited by: Matt on Sep 14, 2010 9:17 AMHi Lubos,
phew! that sounds far from SAP scope, but from Maths' numerical methods. Let's see if I can remember something about my lessons at University...
- One issue can arise when adding and subtracting terms which are very similar, because the error tends to arise quite fast. Try to add the positive terms on one hand, and the negative terms on the other hand, then subtract one from the other.
- Please take into account that the determinant value can be significantly close to zero when the condition number of the matrix is low, that is, when the range is 4 but the whole determinant is close to 0. Instead, try a [Singular Value Decomposition|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SVD_(mathematics)] or an [LU decomposition|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LU_decomposition]
I hope this helps. Kind regards,
Alvaro -
Hi there,
New to Fireworks and just getting to grips with it. I have what is probably a simple problem however it is still driving me crazy. I am rounding the edges of images using the rounded rectangle tool and cutting and pasting to get the result. I want a line round the image an am setting this in the properties area no problem however when I have finished and insert this into my web page the rounded corners of the lined border appear slightly thicker and pixilated. I have tried altering some of the settings however this is still not solving the problem thus making the rounded corners look heavy and uneven.
Does anyone have any words of wisdom to solve this problem.
Many thanks.Can you post an example of what you're doing? Use the camera icon in the (just to the left of the smilie face) to add it to your message. (If you use the button to attach an image, then it gets queued and can take hours to be available.)
Then, once we have something concrete to look at, you can explain exactly what it is you don't like about it and what you wish were different. -
PPro cs6 - Audition cs6 - PPro, round trip problem
I'm having trouble completing the round trip. I got my audio tracks from PPro CS6 to Audition CS6 without problems, right by the manual. But I'm having trouble getting that audio work back into PPro.
I'm working a mid-sized project (one hour class, two cameras, etc. headed for DVD). Got edit lock. Everything is done now except for cleaning up audio. After the audio I can send the whole lot to Encore for DVD making. But first, audio.
Took the entire sequence to Audition via PPro's "Edit...Edit in Adobe Audition...Sequence..." path. This worked just fine. It pushed all the audio files to Audition, Audition opened up and gave me a "make an Audition project" dialog box, etc. Nearly 100 files came over to Audition, on the right tracks, in the right order. Very nice. Made my changes. So far so good.
What I've read in the manual says that all I have to do when I'm done is "File...Save" in Audition, then PPro will have and use the changes. Sorta like Dynamic Link, but different. So I did the the project save.
At this point, things deviated a little from the plan. I started up PPro, opened the project, and no sign of the Audition work. Can't find a file anywhere in the project panel that says Audition on it. The files on the timeline are still the dark green of the multi-camera edit, not the lighter green of an Audition file. When I've done this for individual clips, I've gotten back a file with a name like "*Audio Extracted_1.wav" that shows up with the same green as the Audition icon on my desktop.
So I thought, fine. Not as easy as I had hoped. I'll just have to import it manually. But PPro doesn't seem to have any idea how to deal with a *.sesx file, which is the project file from Audition.
Should I be exporting, say, a *.wav file from Audition (how?) and import that into PPro? And if I do, is there a good workflow to re-sync this audio with my video tracks?
I'm confused. Don't know what I did wrong. Don't know what do to fix it. Don't know how to avoid this in the future. So any help gratefully received.
Bruce WatsonOK, now I *am* confused.
Just did it again (a different DVD project however), as described in my original post. This time PPro stayed open for me. So I sent all the sequence audio files to Audition via the "Edit...Edit in Adobe Audition...Sequence..." comman, then did my editing in Audition, and saved it the Audition project. Go back to PPro, and... nothing. No sign of any file from Audition in the project panel. No sign on the time line. No sign of any Audition file anywhere in PPro that I can find.
What gives? What am I doing wrong?
What I did get was a folder at the same directory level as my PPro project file, a folder in it with the project_name I gave Auditon when it opened from the PPro "Edit...Edit in Adobe Audition...Sequence..." command, and then two files for every clip in the project (a *.wav and a *.pkf), and finally two more files, a project_name.xml and a project_name.xml.sesx.
I suppose I can export a *.wav file to PPro manually. Worked before. But I'd like to learn the "correct" way, the way Adobe intends it to work.
Darned if I can figure out what I'm doing wrong though. Help??? -
[8i] Date/Time calculation problem...
So, I am currently facing a situation where I need to calculate the total hours a workstation is in use for each day in a particular time period. I have a table with the log of each time each workstation is used. The problem is, a workstation can be used for any amount of time, starting on any day and ending on any day. This means that a particular entry in the log can span multiple days. I'm not sure how to split the difference between the end date/time of an entry and the start date/time of the entry over multiple days.
Here's a sample table and some sample data for what I'm trying to do:
-- Note: in reality, this table contains more columns
CREATE TABLE my_hrs
( record_id NUMBER NOT NULL
, sdatetime DATE
, edatetime DATE
, workstation VARCHAR2(4)
CONSTRAINT my_hrs_pk PRIMARY KEY (record_id)
-- Note: sdatetime, edatetime, and workstation CAN all be NULL, though I won't provide
-- any sample data for these situations since I want to ignore them in my results
-- Additionally, there are hundreds of workstations, but I'm only using 2 to simplify the sample data
INSERT INTO my_hrs
VALUES (12345,TO_DATE('03/01/2010 08:00','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/01/2010 13:35','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'123A');
INSERT INTO my_hrs
VALUES (13427,TO_DATE('03/01/2010 08:10','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/01/2010 10:02','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'321B');
INSERT INTO my_hrs
VALUES (21543,TO_DATE('03/01/2010 14:07','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/01/2010 16:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'123A');
INSERT INTO my_hrs
VALUES (22412,TO_DATE('03/01/2010 10:15','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/01/2010 15:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'321B');
INSERT INTO my_hrs
VALUES (11976,TO_DATE('03/01/2010 17:00','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/02/2010 02:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'123A');
INSERT INTO my_hrs
VALUES (34215,TO_DATE('03/01/2010 22:10','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/02/2010 04:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'321B');
INSERT INTO my_hrs
VALUES (24789,TO_DATE('03/02/2010 13:00','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/05/2010 02:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'123A');
INSERT INTO my_hrs
VALUES (31542,TO_DATE('03/02/2010 21:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/04/2010 10:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'321B');Based on my sample data above, these are the results I want to see:
WORKSTATION DATE HRS_IN_USE
123A 3/1/2010 14.96667
321B 3/1/2010 8.95000
123A 3/2/2010 13.50000
321B 3/2/2010 7.00000
123A 3/3/2010 24.00000
321B 3/3/2010 24.00000
123A 3/4/2010 24.00000
321B 3/4/2010 10.50000
123A 3/5/2010 2.50000
321B 3/5/2010 0.00000Is this possible? (Please note, if the workstation was not used on a particular day, I want it to show 0 hours for that workstation for that day). Another thing to note is that I'm working with Oracle 8i.
Thanks in advance for the help!Thanks, Frank, your explanation helped. My main problem was just that I couldn't picture what that line of the query was doing, even working from the inside out. I learn better through visual and hands-on methods, so to really understand, I had to look at the cross-join of a and h and go line by line. (In case there's anybody who looks at this post in the future and learns like I do, I've posted that data below).
This definitely solves my problem!
>
By the way, this query is full of things that could be done better in later versions of Oracle. Generating table a is just one of them. Starting in Oracle 9, you can do a CONNECT BY query on dual to generate exacly how many rows you need. You never have to worry about an upper bound, and it's much faster than using ROWNUM. From time to time you might gently remind the people who decide these things that you're using a very old, unsupported version of Oracle, and that everyone could be more productive if you upgraded.
>
I could go on and on on this topic.... we have tried and continue to try to convince the powers that be to pay for the upgrades... if it were just Oracle that needed to be upgraded, we might actually have a chance at succeeding. As it is, ...ha.
TABLE A (FROM SUB-QUERY)
a_date next_date
3/1/2010 3/2/2010
3/2/2010 3/3/2010
3/3/2010 3/4/2010
3/4/2010 3/5/2010
3/5/2010 3/6/2010
TABLE H (MY_HRS)
record_id sdatetime edatetime workstation
10000 2/28/2010 18:00 3/1/2010 5:30 123A
12345 3/1/2010 8:00 3/1/2010 13:35 123A
13427 3/1/2010 8:10 3/1/2010 10:02 321B
21543 3/1/2010 14:07 3/1/2010 16:30 123A
22412 3/1/2010 10:15 3/1/2010 15:30 321B
11976 3/1/2010 17:00 3/2/2010 2:30 123A
34215 3/1/2010 22:10 3/2/2010 4:30 321B
24789 3/2/2010 13:00 3/5/2010 2:30 123A
31542 3/2/2010 21:30 3/4/2010 10:30 321B
CROSS-JOIN TABLE A WITH TABLE H (and calculations done by the query below)
record_id sdatetime edatetime workstation a_date next_date LEAST (h.edatetime, a.next_date) GREATEST (h.sdatetime, a.a_date) GREATEST(TO_NUMBER(L-G),0)
10000 2/28/2010 18:00 3/1/2010 5:30 123A 3/1/2010 3/2/2010 3/1/2010 5:30 3/1/2010 0:00 0.229166667
10000 2/28/2010 18:00 3/1/2010 5:30 123A 3/2/2010 3/3/2010 3/1/2010 5:30 3/2/2010 0:00 0.00000
10000 2/28/2010 18:00 3/1/2010 5:30 123A 3/3/2010 3/4/2010 3/1/2010 5:30 3/3/2010 0:00 0.00000
10000 2/28/2010 18:00 3/1/2010 5:30 123A 3/4/2010 3/5/2010 3/1/2010 5:30 3/4/2010 0:00 0.00000
10000 2/28/2010 18:00 3/1/2010 5:30 123A 3/5/2010 3/6/2010 3/1/2010 5:30 3/5/2010 0:00 0.00000
12345 3/1/2010 8:00 3/1/2010 13:35 123A 3/1/2010 3/2/2010 3/1/2010 13:35 3/1/2010 8:00 0.23264
12345 3/1/2010 8:00 3/1/2010 13:35 123A 3/2/2010 3/3/2010 3/1/2010 13:35 3/2/2010 0:00 0.00000
12345 3/1/2010 8:00 3/1/2010 13:35 123A 3/3/2010 3/4/2010 3/1/2010 13:35 3/3/2010 0:00 0.00000
12345 3/1/2010 8:00 3/1/2010 13:35 123A 3/4/2010 3/5/2010 3/1/2010 13:35 3/4/2010 0:00 0.00000
12345 3/1/2010 8:00 3/1/2010 13:35 123A 3/5/2010 3/6/2010 3/1/2010 13:35 3/5/2010 0:00 0.00000
13427 3/1/2010 8:10 3/1/2010 10:02 321B 3/1/2010 3/2/2010 3/1/2010 10:02 3/1/2010 8:10 0.07778
13427 3/1/2010 8:10 3/1/2010 10:02 321B 3/2/2010 3/3/2010 3/1/2010 10:02 3/2/2010 0:00 0.00000
13427 3/1/2010 8:10 3/1/2010 10:02 321B 3/3/2010 3/4/2010 3/1/2010 10:02 3/3/2010 0:00 0.00000
13427 3/1/2010 8:10 3/1/2010 10:02 321B 3/4/2010 3/5/2010 3/1/2010 10:02 3/4/2010 0:00 0.00000
13427 3/1/2010 8:10 3/1/2010 10:02 321B 3/5/2010 3/6/2010 3/1/2010 10:02 3/5/2010 0:00 0.00000
21543 3/1/2010 14:07 3/1/2010 16:30 123A 3/1/2010 3/2/2010 3/1/2010 16:30 3/1/2010 14:07 0.09931
21543 3/1/2010 14:07 3/1/2010 16:30 123A 3/2/2010 3/3/2010 3/1/2010 16:30 3/2/2010 0:00 0.00000
21543 3/1/2010 14:07 3/1/2010 16:30 123A 3/3/2010 3/4/2010 3/1/2010 16:30 3/3/2010 0:00 0.00000
21543 3/1/2010 14:07 3/1/2010 16:30 123A 3/4/2010 3/5/2010 3/1/2010 16:30 3/4/2010 0:00 0.00000
21543 3/1/2010 14:07 3/1/2010 16:30 123A 3/5/2010 3/6/2010 3/1/2010 16:30 3/5/2010 0:00 0.00000
22412 3/1/2010 10:15 3/1/2010 15:30 321B 3/1/2010 3/2/2010 3/1/2010 15:30 3/1/2010 10:15 0.21875
22412 3/1/2010 10:15 3/1/2010 15:30 321B 3/2/2010 3/3/2010 3/1/2010 15:30 3/2/2010 0:00 0.00000
22412 3/1/2010 10:15 3/1/2010 15:30 321B 3/3/2010 3/4/2010 3/1/2010 15:30 3/3/2010 0:00 0.00000
22412 3/1/2010 10:15 3/1/2010 15:30 321B 3/4/2010 3/5/2010 3/1/2010 15:30 3/4/2010 0:00 0.00000
22412 3/1/2010 10:15 3/1/2010 15:30 321B 3/5/2010 3/6/2010 3/1/2010 15:30 3/5/2010 0:00 0.00000
11976 3/1/2010 17:00 3/2/2010 2:30 123A 3/1/2010 3/2/2010 3/2/2010 0:00 3/1/2010 17:00 0.29167
11976 3/1/2010 17:00 3/2/2010 2:30 123A 3/2/2010 3/3/2010 3/2/2010 2:30 3/2/2010 0:00 0.10417
11976 3/1/2010 17:00 3/2/2010 2:30 123A 3/3/2010 3/4/2010 3/2/2010 2:30 3/3/2010 0:00 0.00000
11976 3/1/2010 17:00 3/2/2010 2:30 123A 3/4/2010 3/5/2010 3/2/2010 2:30 3/4/2010 0:00 0.00000
11976 3/1/2010 17:00 3/2/2010 2:30 123A 3/5/2010 3/6/2010 3/2/2010 2:30 3/5/2010 0:00 0.00000
34215 3/1/2010 22:10 3/2/2010 4:30 321B 3/1/2010 3/2/2010 3/2/2010 0:00 3/1/2010 22:10 0.07639
34215 3/1/2010 22:10 3/2/2010 4:30 321B 3/2/2010 3/3/2010 3/2/2010 4:30 3/2/2010 0:00 0.18750
34215 3/1/2010 22:10 3/2/2010 4:30 321B 3/3/2010 3/4/2010 3/2/2010 4:30 3/3/2010 0:00 0.00000
34215 3/1/2010 22:10 3/2/2010 4:30 321B 3/4/2010 3/5/2010 3/2/2010 4:30 3/4/2010 0:00 0.00000
34215 3/1/2010 22:10 3/2/2010 4:30 321B 3/5/2010 3/6/2010 3/2/2010 4:30 3/5/2010 0:00 0.00000
24789 3/2/2010 13:00 3/5/2010 2:30 123A 3/1/2010 3/2/2010 3/2/2010 0:00 3/2/2010 13:00 0.00000
24789 3/2/2010 13:00 3/5/2010 2:30 123A 3/2/2010 3/3/2010 3/3/2010 0:00 3/2/2010 13:00 0.45833
24789 3/2/2010 13:00 3/5/2010 2:30 123A 3/3/2010 3/4/2010 3/4/2010 0:00 3/3/2010 0:00 1.00000
24789 3/2/2010 13:00 3/5/2010 2:30 123A 3/4/2010 3/5/2010 3/5/2010 0:00 3/4/2010 0:00 1.00000
24789 3/2/2010 13:00 3/5/2010 2:30 123A 3/5/2010 3/6/2010 3/5/2010 2:30 3/5/2010 0:00 0.10417
31542 3/2/2010 21:30 3/4/2010 10:30 321B 3/1/2010 3/2/2010 3/2/2010 0:00 3/2/2010 21:30 0.00000
31542 3/2/2010 21:30 3/4/2010 10:30 321B 3/2/2010 3/3/2010 3/3/2010 0:00 3/2/2010 21:30 0.10417
31542 3/2/2010 21:30 3/4/2010 10:30 321B 3/3/2010 3/4/2010 3/4/2010 0:00 3/3/2010 0:00 1.00000
31542 3/2/2010 21:30 3/4/2010 10:30 321B 3/4/2010 3/5/2010 3/4/2010 10:30 3/4/2010 0:00 0.43750
31542 3/2/2010 21:30 3/4/2010 10:30 321B 3/5/2010 3/6/2010 3/4/2010 10:30 3/5/2010 0:00 0.00000
(Then, the query sums up the last column in the "table" above, grouped by a_date and workstation). -
Alternative sales commission calculation problem
hi sir,
I am a junior consultant trying to solve a problem for my Senior, the question goes as follows:
We are trying to impute sales commissions to sales rep as a discount for every sale, in which for every sale a determined amount is imputed to the sales rep as a commission.
the problem arises when the product is returned and customer asks for a refund. Then the commission should be refunded aswell. Could you please throw some light to wether we should clear that invoice the same month or the next one as a negative pendent discount, if so, how is the negative imputation applied?
thanks a lot in advance,
HFBobsterslc wrote:
Here is a screenshot of a piece of what I'm working on.
Hi Bob,
Here's what your screenshot looks like when embedded in a post, using the HTML code that Photobucket provides (third item in the list of codes provided).
In your original post you said:
I have a table that calculates sales commissions for a number of people and includes an overriding commission for the sales managers. I need to cap the sales commission at a fixed percentage, say 25%, for the sales people.
I'm not sure what you mean by "I need to cap the sales commission at a fixed percentage."
The first question that comes to mind is "25% of what?"
Do you mean that the commission is not to exceed 25% of Total earnings?
If so, your formula for B5 (the first cell where commission is calculated) would be:
=MIN(formula1,B2/3)
Where formula1 is whatever formula is used to calculate the commission when it is less than the cap, and B2 contains the salary/wages which must constitute at least 75% of the total compensation under this interpretation.
Do you mean the commission rate is on a sliding scale that rises with increased sales, but does not exceed 25%?
If so, you need to specify the rules that control the rate. Does it rise in steps? Does the 'new' rate at each step apply to total sales, or only to sales above that step? Are the steps the same size for everyone, directly related to the individual goals, or set by some other criteria?
There's not enough information available fom your table to determine a pattern. For the first three columns, person B's commission is 12% of sales, person C's is under 4% and person D's is 30% of sales.
For a more detailed response, we'll ned a more detailed specification of the question.
Regards,
Barry -
Date Difference Calculation problem
I am creating a form which should calculate the number of days between two calender dat
es using the Date2Sum expression but my result cell gives me
zeo despite setting the locale and the calculation correcttly. Where could
my problem be?
Darlington SakwaValidate the date patterns on the date fields match the date patterns used in Date2Num. For example, the attached has a start date with the display date pattern date{YYYY-MM-DD} and that matches the date pattern in my Date2Num function call.
// form1.page1.startDateNum::calculate - (FormCalc, client)
if (form1.page1.startDate.isNull) then
$.rawValue = ""
else
$.rawValue = Date2Num(form1.page1.startDate.rawValue,"YYYY-MM-DD")
endif
Steve -
I face a problem here. How can i do the round up for this situation in Java? When 2550 is multiplied by 0.03 and then divided by 100. The answer i got is 0.765. When i do the round up, it seems that Java failed to display the correct round up to 0.77, that is in 2 decimal point. It display only 0.76 after rounding up. How can i solve this problem?
its been awile since i remember this rule...but i think we always just made sure whatever we did was consistant... so i may be wrong than what you were taught...
but one rule we had was "always round on five"
then in college we learned in chemistry "round on five only for odds"
so .765 goes to .76 for two digit sig. fig.
while .755 goes to .76 for two digit sig. fig.
you seem sure that it should be .77, so again, maybe the rules were taught differently between us. i just asked my wife, a chemist, and she always rounds for five... again, i think consistancy is the most important, but to answer your question, i dont know any more.. -
Y-intercept calculation problem: "A2:A7" isn't a valid reference
This is actually a problem I have with many calculations in Numbers but I will use the following as an example:
I am trying to calculate the y-intercept and slope for a set of data. Table 1 contains the raw data with each data point in triplicate. In Table 2, column 1 is the ordinate value and column 2 is the abscissa value, which is the average of the triplicates. I would like to place the calculation for the y-intercept in column 3 and the slope in column 4, but always get the error, "A2:A7" isn't a valid reference" for a result. Instead, I have to have a third table for just the y-int and slope. Why isn't A2:A7 a valid reference?No, I didn't; I only had a 5 rows but I made it 7 rows - so it was a 4 column x 7 row table - and then the formulas worked. The odd thing is that there was still only data in the first 5 rows and, after I set up the formulas, I reduced the table back to 4x7 and the formulas remained unchanged. Thanks for the help.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Cisco ISE 1.2 vm cli admin password recovery
I'm having trouble getting this to work. I was under the impression by mounting the ISO (connect at power on) i could perform the password recovery like it states for the hardware appliance. However, if i mount the 1.2.0.899 iso image (connect at
-
Questions: 10-keymap.fdi not working // automounting ntfs drives // ++
Hi there, this time I want to change 100% from windows to linux and i found archlinux to be a really nice system. I like it "the arch way" 1) I followed the beginner's wiki and choose those xf86-input-evdev 2.3.2-1 drivers. I set the 10-keymap.fdi fi
-
I can't create any database at the moment, could anyone help me, thanks very much
-
Good night. I live in Brazil and I'm having trouble implementing some reports on the server ( Win2008 64bit ) . In many scenarios the problem is presented below: Could not load file or assembly ' log4net , Version = 1.2.10.0 , Culture = neutral , Pub
-
When I plug my iPad or iPod into iTunes, it won't allow me to sync
I've tried re downloading iTunes but I can't do that either, it says I need a network source and I couldn't find one, I'm on windows.