RRI - Assignment Objects different

Hi
I am working on a Jump query and am having a problem.
My source query has a InfoObjectA (CHAR 10 - WITH ALPHA CONVERSION ROUTINE) and the target query has a different InfoObjectB (CHAR24 - NO ALPHA CONVERSION ROUTINE), the data are the same for both the Objects but the data types are different. When i drill down from source to target the filters are not being passed inspite of me matching the 2 InfoObjects in Assignment Details.
Am I missing something.
Any help would be rewarded.
EmJay

It didn't work the target query runs open.
Let me be more clear.
Source Query - InfoObjectA (CHAR 10, ALPHA CONVERSION ROUTINE)
Target Query - InfoObjectB (CHAR24, NO ALPHA CONVERSION ROUTINE)
The Data for InfoObjectA and InfoObjectB are the same. So in my Assignment details tab, i selected InfoObject and marked InfoObjectB right across the line. I would like the data from the source to be passed to the target query.
Any thoughts how to acheive this.
thanks

Similar Messages

  • "Account Assignment objects have differing company codes"

    Hi,
    We have parked the document through T.Code : MIR7 & now we want to post the same using the correct GL A/c.
    When we try to post the document we are getting error like "Account Assignment Objects have differing Company Codes"
    Can you please help me
    Thanks
    Ravi kumar

    Please check in the document if it contains diferrent account assignments like both cost center and internal order. In this case both cost center and order must belong to same company code.
    If you find the document fine, then solution is to change the error to warning using T Code OBA5 and application area KI (I assume). You should be seeing application area as part of your error message number which is usually first 2 characters.
    Regards
    Sreenivas

  • OXK3 Assign a different package to the object

    Dear all,
      I trired to create a field in OXK3, but the system returns:
    "Assign a different package to the object
    Message no. TK810"
    I have already tested with different package but it still not correct.
    Regards,
    Kit

    Hi Kit,
    Take a look at [Note 761040|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/761040] to see if the solution offered by SAP for this situation will work in your case.  Here is an excerpt from the Note's solution section:
    First, check whether you have selected the correct development class for the table append structure and whether the transport routes are configured correctly in the Transport Management System.
    The table append structure must belong to a development class which is at least transported to all target systems to which the relevant table is transported.
    Best Regards,
    Jamie

  • Acc.assignment object replaced by current master cost center for employee

    Hi,
    I am facing a peculiar warning message while running the payroll posting run for only 2 employees.  The warning message s as follows:
    "Acc.assignment object replaced by current master cost center for employee
    Message no. 3G399"
    Prior to this, there were an error saying the
    "Account assignment objects are incorrect. No substitution is possible.
    Message no. 3G209"
    Later we found that the Position was not assigned to that employee properly.  I later assigned the correct position.. but still during the posting run the warning message appears.
    Please let me know if this is okay or is this an error which restricts the postings.
    Regards,
    Balaji TR

    Your postings will go through with the first warning message. However, please be warned that any account assignment related entries (IT 0027, 2001, 2002) will be wholly ignored.
    Check if any entries have been made to different cost centers for the erroring employees. If so, check for the reason why those entries have been made (since it is evident that the configuration does not support such entries). You may need to tie in with a CO consultant to ensure that there are no loose ends.

  • The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 1000, not 1100

    Dear consultants,
    I am SAP - HR consultant.
    I have 4 company codes, under one controlling area & payroll area. I executed live Payroll & tried to run posting payroll results. System displayed folloewing error "You want to make a posting in company code 1100. At the same time, a CO account assignment object was specified that is assigned to company code 1000. This is account assignment object with object type CTR, and object key 1000/1010101400. "
    I have created similar accounts 1110101400, 1210101400 & 1310101400 for company codes 1100, 1200 & 1300.
    May I know what could be the reason?
    Regards,
    Bindumadhav

    "this is account assignment object with object type CTR, and object key 1000/1010101400" means; somethings is missing for cost center 1010101400 under the company code 1000. system tries to post and entry for company code 1100 to the cost center 1010101400 which falls under a different company code (1000).
    so it is not realted with GL accounts i believe
    you can go to KS02 and check the company code for the CCenter 1010101400 and change it to 1100.
    or you may change the cost center assigned to employer master and give a new ccenter which is under the company code 1100.
    but if i were you, before making any changes i would consult the a CO consultants first for this issue.

  • The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 2100, not 1100

    Hi All,
    My system has all different company codes assigned to one cotrolling area as a result one can change org unit and position cost center from one company code to another.
    I recently changed same position's cost center from co code 2000 to cost center in new  co code 1100 and created new personnel area to be linked to new Co code 1100. OM module doesn't moan however when I try and capture org-reassignment action to default same employee postion with new related cost center from new company code 1100 get the follwing error.
    'The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 2100, not 1100'.
    I see in IT0001 system defaults new personnel area linked to Co code 1100 however it still defaults old cost center linked to Co code 2000 instead of new cost center linked to Co code1100. How can I make the system default  new cost center?
    NB relationship for new cost center  from Co code 1100 to postion has been changed effective 01.04.2012 . The same date is used for or-reassignment action.

    Hi I had same problem can you explain me little bit more that how you will resolve this

  • Error In Transfer The CO account assignment object belongs to company code

    Dear All,
    When i am trying to transfer a employee from a personnel area to another personnel area, i am getting the following error.
    The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 2000, not 2007
    These personnel areas belong to two different company codes.
    Pls suggest.
    Kind Regards
    Nag

    Hi,
    Please check with the FICO consultant you have to give new CO assignemnt when you transfer  EMPLOYEE to other companycode. i hope so
    Vibin

  • AFAB DEPRECIATION ERROR (CO ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT HAVE DIFFERENT PROFIT CENTERS)

    Hello Every One
    we had a user “ABC” who used to run this AFAB depreciation month end activity as a background job. and was working for her perfectly fine. But since she is no more with us. Now New users “123” and “546” when they run the same activity in the same manner it does not show a batch session created in SM35 list, because there are errors associated with the above 2 user names that I saw in the SM37 LOG which is the cause of making this activity to fail.
    for User 123 it cancelled the job and error shows "CO ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT HAVE DIFFERENT PROFIT CENTERS"
    for user 345 it shows "Not all the documents in the last posting run were posted"
    I will appreciate every one help as it is very crucial and month end activity
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi
    Execute Afab with Repeat option, test mode and error analysis ON
    It should tell which asset had problem. For the 1st error, your asset might have 2 co objects in it and both have different PC s.. See if it can be cchanged
    Br. Ajay M

  • Open and Close Posting Periods According to G/L Account Assignment Objects

    Hi,
    Can anybody please explain me how configurations related to " Open and Close Posting Periods According to G/L Account Assignment Objects " works in SAP FICO? I am confused about this config.
    Regards,
    Mandeep

    Hi Mandeep ,
    First i would like to tell about fiscal year
    fiscal year is nothing but a financial year of company in sap . it contain 12 normal periods and 4 special periods.In genaral we will call like month but that is sap that is a period. so 12 period for 12 months ok next special period will use in all companies for audit and tax adjustment purpose of previous year.
    coming to the open and close periods.in sap for security purpose we have to open one period like this month july so i opened july period only we cant post the pervious month (june)and we cant post future month lik in (Auguest)ok
    You can close and open periods by transaction ob52.
    In transaction ob52 there are account types
    + Valid for all account types
    A Assets
    D Customers
    K Vendors
    M Materials
    S G/L accounts
    V Contract accounts
    + means all types. if you want to open vendor then enter period from and to according to your fiscal year.
    you cant adjust items in closed period. if you want to then you have to open the period
    For your information.....
    posting periods also open user level tc S_ALR_87003642.
    customization levael OB52.
    Regards
    Kumar

  • GR/IR clearing account is being assigned to a acct assignment object

    Hi there!
    My key-user asked me a question which I really don't know how to answer.  He asked me about the reason why in an accounting document automatically generated by MIRO the item which contains the GR/IR clearing acct is always assigned to an acct assignment object (such as WBS element or cost center).
    I noticed that all the acct documents generated by MIRO has this mentioned assignment but, unfortunately I don't know why it happens yet.
    That's I count on you to help me solving this issue I'm facing now. 
    Thanks in advance,
    Rubens Luiz
    SAP SCM Consultant
    +55 21 2141 0033

    Hello there!
    A friend of mine told that it's not a problem at all. And that the reason that the cost object was assigned (or appeared) when you displayed FI accounting document is that since GR/IR Clearing Account is treated as the balance sheet account (I would assume it is the same in your system) and given the Profit Center was appearing in both P&L and Balance Sheet Account Report, SAP will have to use the cost object to derive the ultimate profit center. 
    Thanks in anyway!
    Rubens Luiz
    SCM Consultant

  • How can we assign a different scope of planning in MTO scenario?

    Hi,
    We are using MTO scenario. In this case, during sales order creation checking control AE is getting triggered. We want to use a different scenario during rescheduling transaction. But as per my analysis, V_V2 is also calling the same AE checking control eventhough we assigned a different checking control for Back order processing.
    In this case, can we assign a different checking control (scope of check) for back order processing?
    Regards.

    Let me explain my requirement here....
    This is a kind of trading or sub-contracting. Initially we will give the forecast to vendor...but Vendor will start the finished product production only after getting the confirmed order from us. Hence we thought to use strategy 50. So we will create a PO to Vendor only after getting a confirmed sales order from customer.
    But in strategy 50 ATP confirmation is based on PIR. Hence we created a new requirement class (copy of 45 with ATP active). So in this new strategy ATP is against actual receipts instead of PIRs.
    But sometimes Vendor may not be able to supply as per lead-time...and he may postpone the delivery date. In this case we are getting exception message 10 for the PO...even though PO is specific to a sales order. Still rescheduling job (V_V2) is not populating the new confirmation date as it is referring to the TRLT.
    Hence we want to use ATP based on TRLT during sales order creation. And during rescheduling we want to use a different scope of check ('without TRLT' and with 'No storage location check'). Hence we created a new checking rule for rescheduling and this we assigned for that specific plant.
    As per my observation, rescheduling job is not picking the scope of check that is assigned for rescheduling....it is calling the same checking rule AE during rescheduling also.
    So my question here is... can we call a different scope of check during rescheduling run while using make to order strategy?
    Regards.

  • HT4314 I have two ipods in my house that were set up under the same email.  I have since assigned two different emails.  How can I change the game center account so that is not shared by both ipods because it is for two different users and they are not ha

    I have two ipods in my house that were set up under the same email.  I have since assigned two different emails.  How can I change the game center account so that is not shared by both ipods because it is for two different users and they are not happy?

    By "game center account", do you mean Apple ID?
    If so, you can change it.
    1. Tap settings and navigate to iTunes and App Stores
    2. Tap "Apple ID" and then tap "Sign Out"
    3. Log in with a different ID.

  • Enter a true account assignment object with revenues

    Hi there,
    At my current client site we implemented COPA - Costing Based. I mapped a few revenue accounts  to COPA. Now when I try to make a posting in to COPA using FB70 . The system issues a error Message "Enter a true account assignment object with revenues" . I know  the Prof Segment is the account assignment object  its looking for and the system is not deriving it  from the information I entered in the FB70 document. Am I missing somethig here? Did anyone out there face similar issue??
    You inputs are highly appreciated!
    Regards,
    Siva Padallaparthy

    Hi Siva,
    Please check note 373823 for this error. Also please go through the long text of error message KI166. The solution of the error is mentioned in the long text itself.
    Regards,
    Abhisek

  • Enter a true account assignment object with revenues while reversing FB08

    Hi All
    When I am reversing the document through FB08 I am getting the warning messege "Enter a true account assignment object with revenues"
    Message no. KI166
    Diagnosis
    You made an account assignment for 31211100, a revenue element, in controlling area 1000 to a cost center or profit center.
    System Response
    Cost centers and profit centers can carry revenues in the SAP system as statistics only. To ensure reconciliation between FI and CO for revenue element 31211100, a CO account assignment object must record the revenues as a real value. This object type is used for updating to the reconciliation ledger.
    In principle, it is possible for the SAP system to automatically derive this CO account assignment object, the reconciliation object. However, all postings made in CO for costing-based Profitability Analysis are logged in the reconciliation ledger under "reconciliation object". In this manner, the reconciliation ledger identifies the exact values flowing into the operating profit. If you post reconciliation objects during revenue postings to cost centers or profit centers, you must do so while keeping the interpretation of the reconciliation ledger reports in mind. The sums of revenue postings to profitability segments, cost centers, and profit centers cannot be broken down further.
    Procedure
    To avoid posting to reconciliation objects, make account assignments to a real CO account assignment object.
    If you want to post to reconciliation objects, you can change this message to a warning or a note for future users, or deactivate the message entirely. Use the Implementation Guide under "Controlling: General" and choose Change message control. Enter area KI and message number 166. If you do not enter an individual user here, the change is valid for all users.
    It is not allowing me to reverse the document already posted.
    Please guide
    Thanks in Advance
    Sonal

    Hi,
    Do you have this cost element maintained in OKB9 with a reference to an internal order or profitability segment? If yes, please look at the note 373823.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • New task assigned to user from CurrentItem:UserField using Assign task action is assigned to different user.

    Hello ! 
    I have run into "funny" problem. 
    I have following workflow:
    User is creating item in ListA. In new form he needs to put Manager which is User Field column type. From people picker he is choosing login name Domain\jo (Two letters seems to be important here). User is resolved correctly to John Doe. Item is saved and
    added to list correctly. In list view John Doe is displayed in Manager column. In view item John Doe is in Manager field. In powershell Id;#John Doe is as a Manager field value. 
    Now the "funny" part:
    After item is added to ListA workflow is started automatically. Workflow is assigning new task to user from Manager (CurrentItem:Manager) field using Assign task action. Now the new task is assigned to different person i.e. John Dimagio with login name DOMAIN\jod
    ! When I am logging value to wf history of the CurrentItem:Manager field I am getting sth like i;123#DOMAIN\jod . So value is completely different and wrong. 
    Can someone explain why is this happening? 
    My guess is that using two letters login name can cause such case but why ?
    Regards,

    Hello ! 
    I have run into "funny" problem. 
    I have following workflow:
    User is creating item in ListA. In new form he needs to put Manager which is User Field column type. From people picker he is choosing login name Domain\jo (Two letters seems to be important here). User is resolved correctly to John Doe. Item is saved and
    added to list correctly. In list view John Doe is displayed in Manager column. In view item John Doe is in Manager field. In powershell Id;#John Doe is as a Manager field value. 
    Now the "funny" part:
    After item is added to ListA workflow is started automatically. Workflow is assigning new task to user from Manager (CurrentItem:Manager) field using Assign task action. Now the new task is assigned to different person i.e. John Dimagio with login name DOMAIN\jod
    ! When I am logging value to wf history of the CurrentItem:Manager field I am getting sth like i;123#DOMAIN\jod . So value is completely different and wrong. 
    Can someone explain why is this happening? 
    My guess is that using two letters login name can cause such case but why ?
    Regards,

Maybe you are looking for