Rule based on plant wise

Dear all,
the following details I have done.Its based on DMS
1) I have created a role.In this role I have used responsibility role type.there are two responsible users(A,B). each one is responsible for each value.(I am using Laboratory/office field as value X,Y )so user A for value X,  user B for value Y.When I simulate it ,it shows correct users depends on the role value.
2)Then in the decision task I passed the Laboratory/office value from role container to workflow container....
when I execute the task its not filter the users according to the field values.
both users were get the workitem. my requirement is to filter the users according to the Laboratory/office value .can u help me on this ....?any other setting is missed on this?

thanx for the reply Mr.KK & AK,
I have defined the things correctly.but I have one doubt....
In my scenerio the DMS document is go to approval procedure after its creation. In this document ,I have the field LaboratoryOffice.Then I am using rule container element as LaboratoryOffice.Based on the rule value I have assigned different agents in responsibility. My work flow container also have LaboratoryOffice element.So I done the binding steps in the decision task.
Suppose I execute the workflow template with the initial value (LaboratoryOffice), that time its working perfectly.but when I create the DMS document with one LaboratoryOffice value (without using initial value ) that time its send the documet to all the agents without filtering.
My doubt is,Whether the element can be refered from the DMS document or not?

Similar Messages

  • PO seriel number as per plant wise & Document type wise

    Hi,
    Purchase order seriel numbers should be based on plant wise & Document type wise
    Example:
    Plant    Document Type              Seriel number
    1000       NB                                4500000000 -  4599999999
    1000       UB                                4600000000 -  4699999999
    1000      ZSUB                             4700000000 -  4799999999
    1100       NB                                4800000000 -  4899999999
    1100       UB                                4900000000 -  4999999999
    1100      ZSUB                             4400000000 -  4499999999

    HI,
    U can customize the document type and select the no range depending on the requirements.
    U can even select an internal or a external no range depending on the requirements.
    Suitable no range can be adopted for the document type so that the sequence shall be followed.
    Refer SPRO--MM-PURCHASING-PO----NO RANGES.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Prasanna
    Pls award if helpful.

  • Report for monthly sales(sales office wise,sales group wise,plant wise)

    Please send the Report for monthly sales(sales office wise,sales group wise,plant wise)  with T.CODE.,

    Hi
    As per my knowledge there is no Standard Report in SAP based on sales office, sales group. and plant.
    You may create your own report using MC18,MC21 and MC24.... Otherwise ask your ABAPer's help...
    Muthu

  • A/c determination process - automaticaly flows to the exact plant wise

    HI,
    I'm posting again, on my blw query,
    Pls explain the process abt a/c determination for service po's (with item catelory & a/c assign) during miro.
    For example. I have three plants and same tax codes used for all plants and gl numbers are diff as per below. ,
    For plant #1 - ESA - 101, ESE - 102, VSE -103
    For Plant #2 - ESA- 201, ESE-202, VSE-203
    For Plant #3 - ESA- 301, ESE-302, VSE-303
    And assume gl is assigned in OB40 (w/o tax code combination) as,
    ESA-101 , ESE - 202 , VSE -303 .
    While doing miro for what ever plant, it's going and set on appropriate plant g/l nbrs based on trns. key.
    Pls tell me how a/c determination process flows automaticaly to the exact plant wise.

    Hi ,
       For the automatic account posting to different G/L account for different plant---- Group the plants with different grouping by assigning different valuation grouping code. All the automatic account posting config is to be done for each of the valuation grouping code.
      Thus the automatic account postings to different G/L accounts happen for different valuation grouping code.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Amjad

  • A/c determination process flows automaticaly to the exact plant wise

    Dear All,
    Pls explain the process abt a/c determination for service po's (with item catelory & a/c assign) during miro.
    For example. I have three plants and same tax codes used for all plants. I have defined in FS00 different G/L number for every plant as per below,
    For plant #1 - ESA - 101, ESE - 102, VSE -103
    For Plant #2 - ESA- 201, ESE-202, VSE-203
    For Plant #3 - ESA- 301, ESE-302, VSE-303
    And assume gl is assigned in OB40 (w/o tax code combination) as,
    ESA-101 , ESE - 202 , VSE -303 .
    While doing miro for what ever plant, it's going and set on appropriate plant g/l nbrs based on trns. key. pls tell me how a/c determination process flows automaticaly to the exact plant wise.

    no answer

  • Questions on Rules-Based ATP and Purchase Requisitions for STOs

    Hello experts,
    We are working on rules-based ATP configuration and have several questions about the functionality.  Iu2019m hoping that some of you are using this functionality and can help give us direction.
    In our environment we have multiple distribution centers and multiple manufacturing plants.  We want to confirm sales orders against stock and production orders in any of those plants, depending on the locations that have stock or planned production.  For example, we will place a sales order against plant A.  If there is not enough stock in plant A then rules-based ATP will use location determination to check in plant B, then C.  The scope of check on the ATP check will include stock and released production orders.  We will configure plant A as the u201Cconsolidation locationu201D so if stock is found in plants B or C then stock transport orders will automatically be created to move the stock to plant A before shipping to the customer.
    We have configured rules-based ATP and this functionality is working well in our Development system.  The ATP check is executed and uses the rules-based ATP to find eligible stock in other plants.  The system is also creating purchase requisitions to move the stock to the consolidation plant. 
    Our first concern is that there doesnu2019t appear to be any firm linkage between the sales order and the resulting purchase requisition.  For example, if we create sales order 123 for plant A and the rules-based ATP finds stock in plant B it automatically creates a purchase requisition 987 to move the stock from plant B to plant A.  However, there doesnu2019t appear to be a linkage between sales order 123 and purchase requisition 987.  For instance, if we delete sales order 123 the purchase requisition doesnu2019t get deleted. 
    Our second concern is that the quantity on the purchase requisition can still be confirmed against later sales orders.  For example, say the above scenario resulted in a purchase requisition 987 that consumed all the stock available in plant B.  We then create a second sales order 456 for the same product.  Plant A is out of stock so the rules-based ATP looks in plant B.  We would expect that plant B would also not have any stock because itu2019s all been consumed by the purchase requisition.  Instead, the system creates a second purchase requisition to move quantity from plant B to plant A.  Itu2019s as if the system doesnu2019t realize that the purchase requisition 987 is already planning to move stock out of plant B.
    Does anyone have any thoughts or suggestions on these two scenarios?  Is there a way to configure the system so there is a hard linkage between the sales order and the purchase requisition so that if the sales order is deleted then the purchase requisition is also deleted?  Should ATP realize that purchase orders are consuming inventory and not allow later sales orders to confirm against that same inventory?  Any advice or experience would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    David Eady
    Application Delivery Team Lead
    Propex, Inc.

    Hi,
    The scheduling is done in SCM, and from there, whenever the RBA is triggered, the calculation is done always with the old route in SCM. Until you get back to R/3 this is when your route is determined. But the ATP check is always with the original route. So the idea would be that you change the values of the route while still in APO, this is possible via the user exit. Should be done in scheduling in APO.  
    Hope this information is helpful.
    Regards,
    Tibor

  • How to get open production orders by plant wise

    Hi,
    How to get open production orders by plant wise.
    i know from tcode COOIS, is it possible to get from this. if so what are the parameters we have to give to get open production orders by plant wise.
    is there any tcode or tables available , please provide details .
    regards,
    Hari priya

    Hi,
    What is your definition of Open Production Orders?
    Definetly you will get the report from COOIS for Plant wise.
    Whther you want to consider all the Orders having the Status REL but not DLV?
    Then there is a chance of having the Orders, still with PDLV status but GR is done for the full Qty. May be you don't want to consider the TECO status, eventhough the Order is short closed??
    Better to ommit the Orders with CRTD status also..
    So, based on this which status to consider and which status not to consider..
    You can define the "Selection profile status" in BS42.
    Use this selection profile in COOIS, so that the rsults will be accurate..
    Best Regards,
    Siva

  • KE5Z report and plant wise sales report (Z report develped) not matching

    thanks for support
    could any body tell me in report KE5Z (proft center actual line items) .profit center wise sales is not matching
    with plant wse sales  Z report developed (based on plant - plant wise sales ) In MM01 master data maintenance  we have tagged every plant to a profit center , becoz of this mapping these report should match ? but big differnce is coming?

    Hi,
    Check on it:-
    Missing Data in the KE5Z report
    Regarding reports KE5Z &  S_ALR_87013326
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/KE5Z-Additionaltextfields+missing
    pherasath

  • Default profit centers Plant wise for Balance Sheet tax relevant Items.

    Dear All,
    We have an issue in profit center acccounting.
    In balance sheet accounts, Vat input tax payable, TDS payable, Cenvat clearing etc are picking profit center from 3KEH. When Exicse is getting captured cenvat clearing account having the profit center but while doing the MIRO cenvat clearing do not have profit center & plant.
    Why it is so?
    Basically we are doing the following steps.
    1. Purchase order creation ME21N.
    2.Goods received via migo
    3. invoice receipt via miro.
    At the time of miro posting, system creates automatically accounting document, with default profit center maintained in 3KEH, which are assigned to Vat input tax payable, TDS payable, other tax accounts. For GR/IR clearing account right profit center is picking without any mistake, while doing MIGO & MIRO.
    We need to extract the Balance Sheet profit center wise at plant level.
    Derivation rule is created for this balance sheet account along with Valuation area condition to post to correct profit center maintained under Tcode: 3KEI . But system is taking only default profit center (3KEH).
    I have checked configuration and the following areas like Material master costing view, tax code areas, and account group but did not find any mistake.
    Please advice and Guide us, how to get correct profit center at plant level for these balance sheet accounts instead of default. (I want to make default profit centers plant wise).
    It is urgent.
    Thanks,
    Shailendra Gupta.

    Hi!
    You can use following report :
    S_ALR_87013336 (Report for Balance sheet at Profit Center and Group Level).
    Hope this will help.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Taral Patel

  • How to get list of docs for particulat billing type on plant wise

    very urgent
    is there any t-code, report to look thi
    how to get list of billing docs grnerated  for particulat billing type and if possible  on plant wise also
    very urgetnt
    points to be rewarded
    eagerly waitng from sap gurus

    Dear chakri
    As you may be aware, in VF05 you need to enter either Payer Code or Material Code and then based on the selection criteria, the report will generate.  Please give the (ensure that this code is exist in billing document) Payer code and now select "Further sel.criteria" and DONT forget to enter the date in from column of "Billing docs.date".  By default, there you can see one month date range. 
    Still if you get error message, please let me know the error message.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • PLANT WISE FINANCIAL STATEMENT REQUIRED

    Hi
    Can any one tell me whether any standard report is available in SAP to get the plant wise Financial Statement ( No Business area wise ) as it is having in FBL3N ( thro dyanamic selection ) for GL balances.
    Please reply immediately if possible.
    Thanks and regards
    G. Jana

    As standard you cant get this.
    A Plant would need to be linked to a Profit Center.
    Do you use ERP 6.0
    Perhaps you could add it as a field for document splitting. However you would then have to maintain you business splitting rules as well.
    What is a plant used where you are.

  • F110 output Plant wise

    Hi Gurus,
    My client has the requirement that while executing the APP via T-Code F110, the system should post payment documents with cheque numbers by Plant wise.There are around 80 Plants maintained in SAP and we are not using business area.
            The client wants to clear the open items based on Plant. The plant field is not featuring in the Free selection tab in the T-Code F110 also. Any help in this regard is welcome and thanks in advance for the same.
    Regards
    Gopal

    Hi Gurus,
    Further  to above mentioned Thread
    I also have similar scenario where clients is having two plants under one legal entity.
    Client wants F110 output for customer and vendor invoices as per plant. For both plant , there  are separate bank accounts and respective invoice must go to plant specific bank account as this is legal requirement of the country.
    Could you please let me know configuration steps to manage this scenario.
    Thanks in advance.
    Points would be assigned.
    Bhadouria

  • Plant wise Vendor List

    Dear All,
    I want to find the list of vendor's plant wise. As you all know the vendor is related to Pur.Org. I am able to get the list based on Pur.Org fro Std SAP tables. But my requirement is to get it plant wise & there are 2 or 3 plants assigned to the same Pur.Org which makes it a prob. So please send a solution to crack the same.
    One more thing from std SAP table LFM2 also I tried but my search didnt find any result.
    Thanks in advance!
    Rgds,
    SAP FC

    choose the table LFA1and in field selection choose WERKS (plant) and run it.
    but it may not help u since vendor is created either at company code level or purchase organization level.
    regards,
    indranil

  • T code for sales ageing report plant wise

    Is there any standard report to sales ageing report plant wise & material wise. Pls guide me with the

    Hi Amit,
    based on your configuration, the following standard reports can be usefull
    S_ALR_87012168- Due date analysis for open items
    S_ALR_87012178-Customer open items analysis by balance of overdue items
    S_ALR_87012174- List of customer open items
    S_ALR_87012175-Open items customer due date forecast
    Hope this helps
    Thanks
    Akash

  • APO Rule based ATP for RA Repair

    Hey,
    Could you please help me to turn on rule based ATP for document type RA outbound?
    The senario is as follows:
    Customer returns to my company the product.
    My company has multiple locations (plants) for replacement products. I would like to determine the replacement product location with rule-based ATP. We use rule-based ATP for the sales site w/o issues.
    I set up in configuration:
    ZRA (copy of RA) with business transaction RMA(to trigger the rule based ATP)
    Assigned ZRA / Item usage = R104/ PSTYV= ZXNN (item category allows rule based ATP).
    ZRA     ZNO1     R104     IRRA     ZXNN
    I also did the below rules based ATP item catgegory determination:
    AUART        MTPOS         VWPOS        UEPST         PSTYV
    ZRA     ZNO1     APO0     ZTP1     ZXNN
    ZRA     ZNO1     APO1          ZTP1
    ZRA     ZNO1     APO1     ZXNN     ZTP1
    ZRA     ZNO1     APO2     ZTP1     ZXNN
    When I create with VA01 a ZRA order and add a replacement plant then I get this message:
    The ATP rules are not called up for item 000030 - Message no. /SAPAPO/ATP147
    But when I go from the "APO Availability Check" view to the Rule then I see my rules determined.
    The detail message also says that the system "things" the line was already delivered, which is not the case.
    Could you please tell me if it is possible to combine rule-based ATP with the RA replacement process and if yes how to do it?
    Thanks,
    Sabine

    Check OSS Note 571044 - RBA: Use of calculation profiles and rules
    Regards,

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can two Forte installtion communicate - exactrequirement giv en at

    To me, this clearly looks like a design issue. Here are two options that I can think of: 1) You can achieve this through sql i.e. the sql service on location 1 can allow you to query the database on location 2. Your service object uses the user's cri

  • Input result from a SQL-query into a Variable in ProcessFlow

    I am trying to select a value from a table with file names. This file name should be input to an ftp function. I use a owb function to read the file name then I try to asign the result to a variable. The function GET_FILENAME looks like f_name varcha

  • Runtime problem

    Excute the program it will take more time its urgent for me REPORT ZRPT_MM_006. TYPE-POOLS: slis. tables : likp, lips, bseg, bkpf, mara, t001w, makt,ekko,ekpo. DATA : gt_fieldcat TYPE slis_t_fieldcat_alv. DATA : heading TYPE slis_t_listheader. DATA :

  • Taking long time in displaying the messages in SXMB_MONI

    Dear All, When I go to SXMB_MONI to display messages, it takes very long time in displaying the messgaes. And when i double clicks on any message to see its details then also it takes very long in opening the details. During this period server also b

  • Need Programming Help - Changing Algorithm for PhotoShop's Oil Paint Plug-In Filter

    The existing PhotoShop Oil Paint filter only works well when applied to relatively small image sizes of around 500kb. I need to apply these effects to relatively large image sizes of around 100mb. I do not have a background in programming, but to my