RunInstaller hangs on Solaris 8 and 8.1.7 install

Hello,
We have a new 220R Solaris 8 ( Generic_108528-13 ) box
with the Oracle 8.1.7, the java installer comes up but
during the install process it hangs. Usually at the eom.conf
section ( about 75% complete). This is a Out of the Box
configuration and I have installed successfully on other
Solaris 8 and Oracle 8i builds, just not this one.
Here's a partial truss that the jre cycles through every
second or so:
Received signal #14, SIGALRM, in lwp_sema_wait() [caught]
lwp_sema_wait(0xFF16FA10) Err#91 ERESTART
sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0xFEA0BDE4, 0x00000000) = 0
lwp_sema_post(0xFAE71E30) = 0
setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, 0xFEA0B730, 0x00000000) = 0
lwp_sema_wait(0xFAE71E30) = 0
sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0xFF17AD70, 0x00000000) = 0
setcontext(0xFEA0B6C8)
sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, 0xFF16FA00, 0x00000000) = 0
setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, 0xFEA0BC68, 0x00000000) = 0
sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, 0xFF16FA00, 0x00000000) = 0
lwp_sema_post(0xFE0D1E30) = 0
lwp_sema_wait(0xFE0D1E30) = 0
lwp_sema_post(0xFF16FA10) = 0
lwp_sema_wait(0xFF16FA10) = 0
sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, 0xFF16FA00, 0x00000000) = 0
setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, 0xFEA0BC68, 0x00000000) = 0
sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, 0xFF16FA00, 0x00000000) = 0
lwp_sema_post(0xFE171E30) = 0
lwp_sema_wait(0xFE171E30) = 0
write(16, " <02\00202 kFE u < k\002".., 1520) = 1520
read(16, 0xFE170D90, 32) Err#11 EAGAIN
Thanks

fixed it,
when I took out all PATH's ( setenv PATH .... ) it worked.
Here is what I had had for a PATH list:
setenv PATH /bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/openwin/bin:/usr/dt/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/ucb
setenv PATH ${PATH}:${ORACLE_HOME}/bin
setenv PATH ${PATH}:.
I'm guessing that the install was accessing a make from the wrong
location. that's only a guess.... anyways I commented the all
PATH variables out and the runInstaller worked/completed it task.
Jay

Similar Messages

WLS6.1 hanging on Solaris- and SIGQUIT doesn't work

Hi,
We are experiencing a problem that looks like a deadlock when our server is under load (using WLS6.1SP2, Solaris 8 and the 1.3.1 JVM supplied with WLS). After processing many requests, the server hangs and CPU usage drops to 0%. Unfortunately the standard means of getting a thread dump (sending a SIGQUIT with kill -3 or Ctrl-\) does nothing. The problem also occurs if WebLogic is running under debug (using
-Xdebug -Xnoagent -Djava.compiler=none -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=5555) but alas the debugger hangs when trying to pause the server after this deadlock). It appears as though the server is not accepting any requests (including administrative requests from the console) but this doesn't seem to be due to thread starvation as CPU usage is 0%.
The only output we can get is from truss, which seems to indicate no activity at all until the SIGQUIT is received. It seems to register the SIGQUIT but it looks as though it is not being processed.
Does anyone have any ideas?
Kevin.

We found a solution to this problem, relating to the threading model that the JVM
uses.
Have a look at http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/threads/threads.html for more
details.
The default threading model on Solaris 8 is many-to-many (threads to LWPs) with
thread-based synchronisation. After playing with various threading models, we
found that the best was one-to-one with the alternate thread library. This is
the default provided by Solaris 9, but you can also tell Java to use this with
older versions of Solaris by putting the following line in your start command
prior to executing WebLogic:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Apologies to anyone who was looking for an answer to this beforehand: I should
have replied to this newsgroup back in September!
Kevin Thomas
J2EE Consultant
LogicaCMG
Charlie Therit <[email protected]> wrote:
Kevin,
If you are not able to capture a JVM thread dump, then the next best
thing would be to capture several "/usr/proc/bin/pstack pid" C-level
thread dumps. This information may enable BEA Support to help suggest
potential work arounds. Depending upon the data in the pstack output,
you may also wish to open a support case with Sun.
Sincerely,
Charlie Therit
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support
Kevin Thomas wrote:
Hi,
We are experiencing a problem that looks like a deadlock when our serveris under load (using WLS6.1SP2, Solaris 8 and the 1.3.1 JVM supplied
with WLS). After processing many requests, the server hangs and CPU
usage drops to 0%. Unfortunately the standard means of getting a thread
dump (sending a SIGQUIT with kill -3 or Ctrl-\) does nothing. The problem
also occurs if WebLogic is running under debug (using
-Xdebug -Xnoagent -Djava.compiler=none -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=5555)but alas the debugger hangs when trying to pause the server after this
deadlock). It appears as though the server is not accepting any requests
(including administrative requests from the console) but this doesn't
seem to be due to thread starvation as CPU usage is 0%.
The only output we can get is from truss, which seems to indicate noactivity at all until the SIGQUIT is received. It seems to register
the SIGQUIT but it looks as though it is not being processed.
Does anyone have any ideas?
Kevin.

System_Exec and Open System Command Pipe hangs in Solaris

I'm using LV 7.1.1 on Solaris and I'm having major problems with the System Exec function in combination with Open System Command Pipe.
1. The program has to run different stuff in parallel but the System Exec won't run in parallel with Open System Command Pipe. It immediately hangs and neither function ever returns. LabVIEW must be killed.
2. After executing Open System Command Pipe, stopping the program and then executing a System Exec, that too hangs. The external script called by Open System Command Pipe is no longer running but obviously LV leaves something behind anyway. Close Pipe doesn't seem to clean up everything. Again, LabVIEW must be killed.
3. Also, regardless of any System Exec call, the first time Open System Command Pipe and Read Pipe is executed it takes a very long time to get the result. After stopping the program and restarting it, it's much faster.
Has anyone else experienced these problems?

I'm having the same difficulties... tried many things, with no luck...

RunInstaller hang without apparently errors

The runInstaller hang without apparently error (nothing in the installActions.log, .err and .out)
We originally install 8.1.7.0 64bits on a Sparc 5.8 64 bits without problem, after this, we apply patch 8.1.7.4.1.
Now are necessary installing interMedia software from CD 8.1.7.0 but the runInstaller from CD or in the Sparc hang without errors.
Please, any help will be appreciated!
Any way to trace runInstaller or to find the cause of the hang...
Thanks,
Diego L.
[email protected]

We found a workaround, but not satisfy.
We make a "truss -f -o /tmp/intaller.truss -p <pid>" for the runInstaller process and when it hang, we abort the truss "Ctrl+C" and run it again.
This method "pick up" the runInstaller and the installation continue for some minutes, when the runInstaller hang again we repeat the process (abort the truss and run it again) until the end of installation. :(
We see the truss output and appreciate the same patron when the runInstaller hang... always after a SIGNAL 14 (timeout).
Thanks!
Any help will be apreciated.
[email protected]

Why difference in Solaris and Linux

Hi,
The following program is giving results diferently when I am executing using g++ compiler in Solaris and Linux.
Why it is so.
here is the code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <malloc.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main( void )
size_t size;
char *buf;
if ( ( buf = (char *)malloc(10 *sizeof(char))) == NULL)
exit (1);
size = sizeof( buf );
strcpy(buf, "HelloWorld");
printf("\n Address is : %u String is : %s size : %d ", buf, buf,size);
if (( buf = (char *) realloc(buf, sizeof(20))) == NULL)
exit ( 1);
*(buf+10) = 'A'; *(buf+11) = 'B'; *(buf+12) = '\0';
printf("\n Address is : %u String is : %s\n", buf, buf);
free( buf);
exit( 0 );
Solaris:
Address is : 134160 String is : HelloWorld size : 4
Address is : 135704 String is : HelloWor
Linux:
Address is : 134518824 String is : HelloWorld size : 4
Address is : 134518824 String is : HelloWorldAB
Thanks
Venkat

Hi,
The following program is giving results diferently
when I am executing using g++ compiler in Solaris
and Linux.
Why it is so.
here is the code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <malloc.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main( void )
size_t size;
char *buf;
if ( ( buf = (char *)malloc(10 *sizeof(char))) == NULL)
exit (1);
size = sizeof( buf );The size you get here is the size of buf, which is the size of a pointer, not the size of what buf points to. sizeof(*buf) would give you size of a char, the type (not the object) that buf points to.
There is no portable way to find out the number of bytes allocated on the heap if you are give only a pointer to the memory. You have to remember the size some other way..
strcpy(buf, "HelloWorld");A literal string consists of the characters in the string plus a terminating null, all of which are copied by strcpy. You allocated 10 chars for buf, but are writing 11 chars into it. At this point, the program has undefined behavior. Literally anything at all could happen, because you can't predict the effect of writing outside the bounds of allocated memory.
printf("\n Address is : %u String is : %s size :
e : %d ", buf, buf,size);
if (( buf = (char *) realloc(buf, sizeof(20))) == NULL)The "sizeof" operator in this case is returning the size of the type of a literal 20, which is an int. If you want to allocate 20 bytes, you write 20, not sizeof(20).
exit ( 1);
*(buf+10) = 'A'; *(buf+11) = 'B'; *(buf+12) == '\0';SInce you can't count on buf having more than 4 bytes at this time, you are writing into unallocated memory, with undefined results.
printf("\n Address is : %u String is : %s\n", buf, buf);
free( buf);
exit( 0 );
Instead of asking why you get different results on different platforms, you should be asking why the program doesn't crash on all platforms. :-)
You can avoid these problems with keeping track of allocating memory by using the C++ standard library instead of trying to manage low-level details yourself as in C code.
The standard string class, for example, extends itself as needed, and ensures that heap memory is freed when the string object is deleted or goes out of scope. You don't need pointers, malloc, free, or sizeof to use C++ strings.

Why keyboard and mouse right click not working in Solaris and Linux?

Hi all,
I have two problems:
1) I am working on AWT/Swing application and its working fine in window enviornment,but while running on solaris and linux mouse right-click option window not poping up.
2) Ctrl+c,Ctrl+v,Home and End keyboard key are not working in solaris and linux OS for same application.
Pls provide me some solution for these problem.
-Dinesh

Hi Nik,
Thanks for reply. I found some solution for the above problem.
For mouse right click there was problem in my source code.I have not implemented the mousePressed() method
In case of keyboard Home, End and arrow key working fine after exporting AWTUSE_TYPE4_PATCH=false; in solaris and linux
But still Ctrl-c and Ctrl-v not working.
I am using JDK1.5.0_07+Eclipse IDE 3.1
-Dinesh

Installing 11i on Solaris and migrating 8.0.5 to new 8.1.6 database

I've installed 11i (several times) on a new Sun solaris server. I also selected it to install a fresh database. On another server we have 11.0 and 8.0.5 database. We are using a new server to install 11i and we want to move our database over. I managed to transfer all database files over to the new server and upgrade to 8.1.6 (succeeded)
How do I proceed now to get the 11i applications to use the database i've transferred over. Is this possible??? Can't find any clear documentation on how to merge this database into the applications 11i.
Thanks
null

Gina, I am attempting something similar... but it involves moving an exisiting installation from HP-UX to Solaris, so I cannot move the datafiles... If I run into a method that helps both of us, I will let you know... as of now, I am installing fresh on Solaris and going to try to run upgrade scripts on existing 10.7 and exp/imp into the new instance on 11i (Solaris).
Let me know of anything you find out that could help me, and I will do the same...
thanks
dns

Acrobat X Pro hangs when making PDF. Using on Windows 7 64. Just started hanging. Uninstalled and reinstalled. Installed update. Once it hangs, must go into crtl, alt, delete to force close.

Acrobat X Pro hangs when making PDF. Using on Windows 7 64. Just started hanging. Uninstalled and reinstalled. Installed update. Once it hangs, must go into crtl, alt, delete to force close.

As a debugging step, try printing to the Adobe PDF printer. If that fails, repeat with print-to-file selected. Assuming the print succeeds, open the file in Distiller to complete the creation of the PDF. If you get the PDF, then check to see if AcroTray is properly working as a background task.

After syncing Firefox with my Android phone, Google calendar is not functional. It hangs on "Loading" and will not allow updates or edits. Calendar works in IE, just not Firefox on any computer. Clearing cookies and cache no help.

I synced Firefox with my Droid Razr Maxx Firefox. Now Google Calendar hangs on "Loading" and will not function. Clearing cache and cookies does not help. Works the same on any computer Firefox. But Gmail works fine and Calendar is okay under other browsers.

Do a malware check with some malware scanning programs on the Windows computer.<br />
You need to scan with all programs because each program detects different malware.<br />
Make sure that you update each program to get the latest version of their databases before doing a scan.<br /><br />
*http://www.malwarebytes.org/mbam.php - Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware
*http://www.superantispyware.com/ - SuperAntispyware
*http://www.microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx - Microsoft Safety Scanner
*http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/defender/default.mspx - Windows Defender: Home Page
*http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html - Spybot Search & Destroy
*http://www.lavasoft.com/products/ad_aware_free.php - Ad-Aware Free
See also:
*"Spyware on Windows": http://kb.mozillazine.org/Popups_not_blocked

10g BPEL process upgrade to 11g hangs in Jdeveloper and Ant script

I have successfully upgraded several 10g (10.1.3.4) BPEL processes and ESB services using Jdeveloper 11g (11.1.1.6.0) migration wizard and deployed them to an 11g environment. Both 10g and 11g environments are up and running.
However, my 11g jdeveloper hangs when migrating the next BPEL process. It hangs at the message box with the title: "Migration Status". I tried the Ant script and it hangs too. It hangs after printing out:
"CompositeRefs
[upgrade] WARNING: UPGBPEL-02009: No Binding setup for : "soapCheckPrivileges"
. This will cause compilation of the upgraded project to fail. Check SOA Upgrade
documentation on manual steps necessary to bind this composite reference. If ne
cessary, upgrade and deploy any dependencies. If planning to retain 1013x nodes
in this projects dependency tree, check earlier part of this log for 1013x WSDL
URLs that can be used."
I guess it makes sense since Jdeveloper and Ant script use the same code base for migration.
One other observation is that if I kill the hanging jdeveloper process and reopen it and go through the migration wizard again, it will be successful without hanging. However, when I fix all the wsdl reference and do a build and deploy to sar. The resulting sar is defective and cannot be deployed to Weblogic even if both build and deploy to sar report success. The defective sar contains only scac.log and scac-log.xml, not even composite.xml.
One difference between this BPEL process and others I have successfully upgraded is that it depends on an ESB service (this esb service has been upgraded and deployed to 11g).
Any ideas?
Thanks,

I will answer my question. I killed the migrating Java process and the migrating wizard will report failure of migrating the .jpr file. Actually, the only thing missing in the migrated .jpr file is deployment profile which I can generate from deployment menu. And I can deploy the migrated process. This works as a workaround.

Why my MacBook Air keeps hanging on Desktop and Scree Saver indicating "loading photos" ?

Why my MacBook Air keeps hanging on Desktop and Screen Saver indicating "Loading Photos" ?

Are you opening iPhoto automatically or via auto-resume at startup?

Wireless Networking / Solaris and a Dell Dimension 8100

I'm getting ready to buy a Dell Dimension 8100 and I want to install Win2K, Solaris 8, and Mandrake Linux on it. I'm also interested in setting up a Wireless network in my house. I can get the following wireless setup from Dell, but will it work with Solaris?
Dell Truemobile 1150 Wireless Networking PCI Card and Base Station
Thanks,
Matt

Hi,
Yes, based on its specs, it has wireless g:
Connectivity
USB 2.0
Ethernet
PictBridge
Wireless 802.11g
HP Printer Adapters with Bluetooth Wireless Technology (HP models bt450, bt500) (optional)
Hope this helps.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

Sessions/connections gets hang during update and select operations.

A table with 3 million records, which has customer details data.
Everyday application is executing select and update queries on that table.
Sessions/connections gets hang during update and select operations.
After checking ADDM report, following are the findings:
Please suggest the solutions
Findings and Recommendations
Finding 1: Row Lock Waits
Impact is 145.22 active sessions, 99.77% of total activity.
SQL statements were found waiting for row lock waits.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is 145.22 active sessions, 99.77% of total activity.
Action
Significant row contention was detected in the TABLE
"AVAYA.AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER" with object ID 82155. Trace the cause of
row contention in the application logic using the given blocked SQL.
Related Object
Database object with ID 82155.
Rationale
The SQL statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv" was blocked on row locks.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 974vg65j29pmv.
UPDATE AVAYA.AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER SET PREFERRED_LANGUAGE = :1
WHERE ( AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER.MSISDN = :2 )
Rationale
The session with ID 50 and serial number 34525 in instance number 1 was
the blocking session responsible for 100% of this recommendation's
benefit.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Application" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is 145.22 active sessions, 99.77% of total activity.
Finding 2: Top SQL Statements
Impact is 46.39 active sessions, 31.87% of total activity.
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found. These
statements offer a good opportunity for performance improvement.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is 46.39 active sessions, 31.87% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the UPDATE statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv" for
possible performance improvements. You can supplement the information
given here with an ASH report for this SQL_ID.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 974vg65j29pmv.
UPDATE AVAYA.AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER SET PREFERRED_LANGUAGE = :1
WHERE ( AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER.MSISDN = :2 )
Rationale
The SQL spent only 0% of its database time on CPU, I/O and Cluster
waits. Therefore, the SQL Tuning Advisor is not applicable in this case.
Look at performance data for the SQL to find potential improvements.
Rationale
Database time for this SQL was divided as follows: 100% for SQL
execution, 0% for parsing, 0% for PL/SQL execution and 0% for Java
execution.
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv" was executed 212 times and had
an average elapsed time of 2494 seconds.
Rationale
Waiting for event "enq: TX - row lock contention" in wait class
"Application" accounted for 100% of the database time spent in
processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv".

**addm report **
          ADDM Report for Task 'TASK_7526'
Analysis Period
AWR snapshot range from 5003 to 5004.
Time period starts at 08-JUL-13 11.00.27 AM
Time period ends at 08-JUL-13 12.00.45 PM
Analysis Target
Database 'AVAYADB' with DB ID 2878789264.
Database version 11.2.0.1.0.
ADDM performed an analysis of instance avayadb, numbered 1 and hosted at
NG-LA04AVAYA01.
Activity During the Analysis Period
Total database time was 563062 seconds.
The average number of active sessions was 155.63.
Summary of Findings
   Description         Active Sessions      Recommendations
                       Percent of Activity
1 Row Lock Waits      155.44 | 99.88       1
2 Top SQL Statements 26.67 | 17.14        1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          Findings and Recommendations
Finding 1: Row Lock Waits
Impact is 155.4 active sessions, 99.88% of total activity.
SQL statements were found waiting for row lock waits.
   Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
   Estimated benefit is 155.44 active sessions, 99.88% of total activity.
   Action
      Significant row contention was detected in the TABLE
      "AVAYA.AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER" with object ID 82155. Trace the cause of
      row contention in the application logic using the given blocked SQL.
      Related Object
         Database object with ID 82155.
   Rationale
      The SQL statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv" was blocked on row locks.
      Related Object
         SQL statement with SQL_ID 974vg65j29pmv.
         UPDATE AVAYA.AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER SET PREFERRED_LANGUAGE = :1
         WHERE ( AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER.MSISDN = :2 )
   Rationale
      The session with ID 167 and serial number 6084 in instance number 1 was
      the blocking session responsible for 100% of this recommendation's
      benefit.
   Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
      Wait class "Application" was consuming significant database time.
      Impact is 155.45 active sessions, 99.88% of total activity.
Finding 2: Top SQL Statements
Impact is 26.66 active sessions, 17.14% of total activity.
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found. These
statements offer a good opportunity for performance improvement.
   Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
   Estimated benefit is 26.67 active sessions, 17.14% of total activity.
   Action
      Investigate the UPDATE statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv" for
      possible performance improvements. You can supplement the information
      given here with an ASH report for this SQL_ID.
      Related Object
         SQL statement with SQL_ID 974vg65j29pmv.
         UPDATE AVAYA.AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER SET PREFERRED_LANGUAGE = :1
         WHERE ( AIRTEL_CUSTOMER_MASTER.MSISDN = :2 )
   Rationale
      The SQL spent only 0% of its database time on CPU, I/O and Cluster
      waits. Therefore, the SQL Tuning Advisor is not applicable in this case.
      Look at performance data for the SQL to find potential improvements.
   Rationale
      Database time for this SQL was divided as follows: 100% for SQL
      execution, 0% for parsing, 0% for PL/SQL execution and 0% for Java
      execution.
   Rationale
      SQL statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv" was executed 707 times and had
      an average elapsed time of 794 seconds.
   Rationale
      Waiting for event "enq: TX - row lock contention" in wait class
      "Application" accounted for 100% of the database time spent in
      processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "974vg65j29pmv".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          Additional Information
Miscellaneous Information
Wait class "Commit" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Concurrency" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Configuration" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Network" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "User I/O" was not consuming significant database time.
Session connect and disconnect calls were not consuming significant database
time.
Hard parsing of SQL statements was not consuming significant database time.

IBM OS ISSUE: SYSTEM HANG WITH JFS2 AND HEAVY LOAD

제품 : ORACLE SERVER
작성날짜 : 2004-11-24
IBM OS ISSUE: SYSTEM HANG WITH JFS2 AND HEAVY LOAD
==================================================
PURPOSE
이 문서는 IBM AIX5L OS 상에서 Arch Process가 online redo log
를 release하지 못하고 OS의 kill 명령으로 kill조차 되지 않을 경우
조치 방법이다.
Problem Description
이 문서는 다음 OS 정보와 Oracle version인 경우에 해당한다.
Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition - Version: 9.2.0.5.0
Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition - Version: 8.1.7.4.0
AIX5L Based Systems (64-bit) or (32-bit)
문제 발생 당시의 증상은 다음과 같다.
- arch-process doesn't release redolog files
- arch-process doesn't die after database shutdown
- arch-process can't be killed
genclntsh 수행 시 hang 상태이다.
(sleeping...)28590: kwaitpid(0x2FF22470, -1, 4, 0x00000000, 0x00000000)
또는 이 문제로 인하여 ORA-600[2103] 에러가 발생하기도 한다.
이 에러가 발생하는 원인은 IBM AIX5L 64bit, 32bit OS 이슈에 있다.
IBM OS issue: SYSTEM HANG WITH JFS2 AND HEAVY LOAD.
Workaround
none
Solution Description
OS AIX5L ML4.0(5.2.0.40)의 bos.up / bos.mp / bos.mp64 fileset level을
갖는 JFS2 file system을 갖는 경우에 해당한다.
AIX 5.3 APAR IY59387은 IY58143에 포함되어 있다.
JFS2 file system에 Heavy I/O activity가 발생하면 database process에
HANG 문제를 야기시킬 수 있다. 이 때 database process가 kill -9
명령으로 kill되지 않는다. 데이타베이스를 SHUTDOWN하여도 Process가
계속 살아 있게 된다.
Process에게 SIGKILL 함수가 issue되었지만 영향을 주지 않게 된다.
Process를 제거하는 유일한 방법은 OS를 reboot하는 것이다.
문제를 예방하는 방법은 IBM APAR-FIX IY59082 를 적용하는 것이다.
이 APAR는 bos.64bit 5.2.0.42에 포함되어 있다.
Fix :
Need to install the IBM APAR-FIX IY59082, this APAR is included on
bos.64bit 5.2.0.42.
(주) IBM 엔지니어에게 확인 결과 이 Patch 안에 AIX5L 32bit 용과 64bit
용이 모두 포함되어 있는 것으로 확인됨.
Reference Documents
<Note:285158.1>

b,
The install was from my original Dell XP Pro-SP1 'Reinstallation' CD along with the complete MS XP-SP2 download that I burned to another CD. I also had all the latest Dell drivers from their website burned to a CD. Install went as follows:
- Format HD
- Install XP Pro SP1
- Install SP2
- Install Dell Drivers
- Obtain any MS patches from their site
- Install Office
- Update Office from the MS website
- Install iTunes
- Tweak MS settings
- Install many software programs
- Make an interim Image of system and store to ExHD
- Install other software programs (mostly security programs)
- Make another 'complete' Image to ExHD
- Restore backup data and music
After additional testing last night, I determined that it is not iTunes at all (or to blame). I get intermittent hangs/freezes/pauses in other media players (WMP, etc.).
Seems that something is causing the 'System' process to periodically jump up in CPU %age (though not more than 30-50%). Even this relatively small amount is enough to pause the playback of music or video, hang the mouse movement for a brief moment, or delay a menu opening. All very subtle - you have to be looking for it to notice (except with real-time audio-video, which is quite noticeable whenever this happens).
I had this problem a year ago, which is why I reimaged then and stayed with SP1 on the advice of Dell and Webroot. I'm stumped as to where to look for the culprit. Every time I go back to the original HD with SP1, everything runs smoothly. Some sort of system call is generating this complete pause....
I'll be limited in my Internet ability for the next several days, so I may be out of touch until Friday. I'll keep testing and playing with the limited equipment I take along....
Any thought you or others want to toss out, I'll attempt when possible.
Thanks!

After the update, Photoshop CC hangs after launch and can't be used. How do I fix this?

After the update, Photoshop CC hangs after launch and can't be used. How do I fix this?

Please try to perform the steps given the following help article.
http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb/cc-applications-crash-immediately-launch.html
If it does not worked then try to reset the preference of Photoshop CC application.
Please check http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb/preference-file-functions-names-locations.html in order to reset Photoshop preferences.

RunInstaller hangs on Solaris 8 and 8.1.7 install

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for