RV016 Protocol Binding & Access Rules do not work on PPTP

Hi
I am Enabled PPTP Server and connection success, but can’t block the internet service by Protocol Binding and Access Rules for PPTP client.
The PPTP Server:
192.168.1.150~160
Protocol Binding:
HTTP [TCP/80~80] -> 192.168.1.150~160(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)
Access Rules:
1; Enable; Deny; HTTP [80]; LAN; 192.168.1.150~160; Any; Always
Firmware Version: 3.0.0.19-tm
I tried to test the setting by local PC connect the router directly. The rule is running.
But by PPTP, it can go to internet. And confirmed the VPN IP is 192.168.1.150

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:表格內文;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
HI Mr Krastew.
Thank you for your reply.
But i am not looking stop internet web service on my client side only.
May be I explain more here.
The client PC is running on intranet, that mean client network stopped all service [1~65535: TCP/UDP] pass through WAN. At this moment, the client network allows the PPTP Port 1723 pass through it only. And the Client PC is running on manual configure No DNS.
And the client requests that client PC NO intranet service when PPTP VPN connected. So I can't Disable Using Remote Network Default Gateway on TCP/IP Configure.
And Server (RV016), half of pc allow connect to internet.
The Local PC in server LAN can control by ACL.
The client connected by PPTP and the IP still within the ACL. But it can access internet all service. (e.g. FTP, HTTP).
So I want to know it is my configure problem? Or the router own problem? Or my design problem?
Now, I key in wrong DNS on client PC to Cheat the user for temporary.
Best regards,
Joe Wong

Similar Messages

Firewall Access Rules do not work on One to One NAT (RV042G Router)

I have two unique IP addresses, two servers, and one RV042G router.
What I would like to do is have each IP address go to it's own respective server. To do that, I've set the settings on One-to-One NAT to make this happen. Now IP address 1 points to server A and IP address 2 points to server B.
However, I only want port 80 to be open to each server. I've tried setting the Firewall access rules to accommodate this but it doesn't appear to block anything. All ports on the servers are exposed despite the firewall rules.
Here's what I have in the router configuration:
Under One-to-One NAT:
{internal IP address 1} => {external IP address 1}
{internal IP address 2} => {external IP address 2}
Under Firewall Access Rules:
Action | Service | Source Interface | Source | Destination | Time
Allow | HTTP Secondary 80 | WAN1 | Any | {internal IP address 1} | Always
Deny | All Traffic | WAN1 | Any | Any | Always
Is there a proper way to accomplish what I want?

Thanks for replying.
Turns out I had to add new access rules to specifically deny all traffic to the internal addresses, in addition to the rule allowing the specified ports through.
So, with the IP addresses still defined the same way in the One-to-One NAT section, I now have the following rules defined in the firewall section:
Under Firewall Access Rules:
Priority | Action | Service | Source Interface | Source | Destination | Time
[1] | Allow | HTTP Secondary 80 | ANY | Any | {internal IP address 1} | Always
[2] Deny | All Traffic | WAN1 | Any | { internal IP address 1 } | Always <== the new one I ended up adding
(default) | Deny | All Traffic | WAN1 | Any | Any | Always <== built in default rule in router
I originally did not add the second rule because I had assumed that the default deny rule would block all traffic to all internal IP addresses anyway. Perhaps someone can correct me if I'm wrong but I am now assuming that the default deny rule applies to the router only and not to any other defined One-to-One NAT entries. In which case, I had to add another rule that duplicates the default deny rule but for each 1:1 NAT entry.
If this was already in the manual, I probably missed it so that would be my own mistake. Still, I wish this was more apparent in the web GUI as it didn't really specify that I had to do this.
In any case, I hope my solution helps anyone else in the future having this similar issue.

RV180W - Access Rules Don't Work

Hi,
We have a RV180W and the Access Rules will not work. I'm trying to block HTTP and HTTPS services for a specific workstation on our LAN, but the access rules don't seem to be working. I've also tried blocking different services as well as ANY service, but it's not working. I've tried rebooting the router after adjusting settings; I've tried adjusting services from the Port Forwarding menu first; and a couple weeks ago, I upgraded the firmware to version 1.0.2.6 and repeated all the previous steps. Nothing seems to be working. So far the only solution I could come up with is to block the workstation's MAC address altogether, but I don't want that because I still need it to hit the internet for other services.
Thank you,
Ryan

These are the Access Rules I've tried (firmware v1.0.2.6):
Outbound:
Inbound along with the auto added Port Forwarding setting:

Rules are not working correctly in OCS 10.1.2

Hi,
A few days ago we have encountered a problem in which the BCC rules or any other rules are not processed out of the user's mailbox.
For example, a user goes to Oracle Mail (the web access, but not WAC), goes to Filters and creates a new rule for dealing with incoming mail (delivered or read, doesn't matter). The rule is processed ONLY if the the user asked to move/copy the mail to a subfolder IN HIS MAILBOX.
If the user asks to forward ("Send a blind copy to") the delivered mails to a different mailbox (e.g. in OCS or to externally to gmail), the mail is NOT processed by the filter.
Other than that mails are treated normally, incoming and outgoing. Manually forwarding to other OCS users also works, as well as forwarding to external mail systems such as gmail. Only the 'automatic' forward rule does not work.
We have checked that the rules/filters are created with " oesrl -p" - and they are created.
How can we troubleshoot this issue? Has anyone encountered it?
System details:
OCS 10.1.2
Platform: Red Hat AS 4
DB version: 10.1.0.4.2
Thanks,
-- Itay.

Update:
Problem resolved. restarted the SMTP-out service.

Bind variable peeking does not work

Oracle 9.2.0.8
create table my_table (c number);
create index i on my_table(c);
declare
par varchar2(10);
begin
par:='qqq';
for rec in (select * from my_table t where c = par or par is null )loop null; end loop;
--USES FULL TABLE SCAN, works SLOW!!!
--but the same query with constat insted of bind variable :
for rec in (select * from my_table t where c = par or 'qqq' is null )loop null; end loop;
--USES INDEX i ON column c , works FAST!!!
--WHY bind variable peeking does not work ???
end;
Thank you for reply

sqlplus:
drop table my_table;
create table my_table as select object_name as c from all_objects where rownum<=1000;
insert into my_table select * from my_table;
insert into my_table select * from my_table;
insert into my_table select * from my_table;
insert into my_table select * from my_table;
insert into my_table select * from my_table;
insert into my_table select * from my_table;
commit;
select count(1) from my_table;
COUNT(1)
64000
create index my_table_idx on my_table(c);
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('bogdanov','my_table',cascade=>true)
variable par varchar2(10)
exec :par := 'www'
--FIRST CASE
explain plan for select * from my_table where c=:par or 'www'='qqq';
@?\rdbms\admin\utlxpls
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 64 | 1792 | 3 |
|* 1 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | MY_TABLE_IDX | 64 | 1792 | 3 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 access("MY_TABLE"."C"=:Z)
--SECOND CASE
explain plan for select * from my_table where c=:par or :par='qqq';
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 703 | 19684 | 95 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | MY_TABLE | 703 | 19684 | 95 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 filter("MY_TABLE"."C"=:Z OR :Z='qqq')
--THIRD CASE very strange.... COMPARE IT WITH FIRST CASE: 123456789 vs. 'qqq'
explain plan for select * from my_table where c=:par or 'www'=123456789;
@?\rdbms\admin\utlxpls
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 703 | 19684 | 95 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | MY_TABLE | 703 | 19684 | 95 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 filter("MY_TABLE"."C"=:Z OR TO_NUMBER(:Z)=123456789)
Edited by: user450084 on Dec 9, 2008 5:17 AM
Edited by: user450084 on Dec 9, 2008 5:27 AM

Inactive firewall access rule can still work?

Hi all,
I have a asa firewall which has a inactive access rule whose enabled checkbox is not checked. However it seem that this access rule can still work.
Hence i would like to know what is the difference in having the access rule's enabled checkbox check or uncheck. Pls advise, thks in advance.

I'm assuming by rule you mean an inactive access-list entry? If so, did you try clearing the translations (clear xlate) after disabling it?
Try running packet-tracer to determine if that is the rule that the traffic is hitting.

The UniquekeyValidator Rule is not working in the EO edit dialog.

The UniquekeyValidator Rule is not working in the EO edit dialog. We have Jdeveloper9i V. 9.0.3.2. The unique flags are checked in the primary key attribute and the custom message is never showed.
Is there a Known bug about that? if yes.. does exist any patch to fix that?
Thank u

Thank u for your answer.
Yes, of course .. i�ve already apply the unique key validator for the entity.. so that custom error message is the error im trying to get in the application.
Other issue is when im trying to edit that error message: when im going to edit the message the previous error im entered is not there. Is it normal?

Substitution rule is not working correctly

Hi PS Gurus,
We have a problem in one of the newly created projects that the substitution rule is not working correctly; the data is not copied to the WBS element Cust. Enhancement tab.
Project 1 is working fine and the data is copied & Project 2 and Project 3 are not getting all the data copied to the WBS element,
In that project profile (substitution rule is given), substitution rule is also maintained
So please help why in one project substitution rule in working & other isnu2019t.
Many Thanks in Advance.
MM

Hello Menaka,
Select the WBS element in the project builder.
Cleck on Edit --> Validation Substitution --> Substitution
You will get the list of Substituitions, Double click on the required Substition rule.This action will generate a log, whether substitution has been succesfully caried out or with some error.
Kindly provide us that error log to guide you further.
Regards
Ravi

Calcmanager rules are not working

Hello there,
we have existing EPM environment 11.1.2.1, We just Installed a new EPM environment 11.1.2.3. After the installation and configuration I exported Calc manager rules from 11.1.2.1 and imported them in to 11.1.2.3 environment.
It looks like Business rules are not working there. Below are the symptoms of the problem.
(1) Rules keeps giving random validation errors. (Same rule validates in 11.1.2.1 fails in 11.1.2.3)
(2) If I create a new rule for my planning application (lets say Test_Rule) and check the DB table I don't see any object being created. (Select * from HSP_OBJECT where OBJECT_NAME = 'Test_Rule')
(3) Any updates I make to the rules in 11.1.2.3 is not being saved.
It looks like Calc Manger is having hard time talking to planning DB.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks!

If you have upgraded from 11.1.2.1 to .3 you would need to upgrade the planning application. Assuming that you have done that, for validation, you would need to provide validation value for all your Run Time Prompts.
This can be done in the variables tab of the Rule Designer.
Let me know if you have issues after these steps.
Sree Menon
Calc Manager Team

"access restrictions" did not work sometimes when using 3-tier DeskI.

My customer found that "access restrictions" did not work sometimes when using 3-tier DeskI.
But this issue can be solved by logging on from another machine, or restarting the DeskI.
For I can reproduce this issue, so I just want to know that:
1.What is it probably related to?
2.If this issue happens again, what can I suggest my customer for tracking it?
For example, get some log files from servers etc.
Thanks!

Hi Sarah,
Also you can try the following solution.
1. Import the universe.
2. Go to manage access restrictions
3. Remove the restriction .
4. Again create the rescrition and unchecked the " limit size of result set to"
5. Now assign it to the unlimited results group ( this is the name of
the group we have given to those users who should be able to retrieve
more than X rows)
6. Now we save the universe. (Dont export the universe).
I hope this will help you.
Regards,
Sarbhjeet Kaur

Valdiation rule does not work on PrimaryBillToCity field

Hello to everyone,
Valdiation rule does not work on PrimaryBillToCity field (and other address fields)
Have someone a workaround ?
Thanks.
ML

I do not believe it is possible to do validation on the address fields in the address block.

Windows 8 Last Access Time Stamps not working

Hi I have been trying to fix a issue with last access time stamps not working when I open a file
so will have time on created modified and accessed from when created but some are wrong like one file
saying
created ‎Sunday, ‎September ‎14, ‎2014, ‏‎5:19:32 AM
modified ‎Sunday, ‎September ‎14, ‎2014, ‏‎5:19:32 AM
accessed Sunday, ‎September ‎14, ‎2014, ‏‎5:19:32 AM
I'm not sure what can cause this please help thank you

Hi whowhatwere,
Are you only confused about the last access time not change when you open a file?
If you want to know more details about modified and created time, we can refer to the following KB.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/299648/en-us
About the accessed time, please refer to the following blog.
How do I access a file without updating its last-access time?
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2011/10/10/10222560.aspx
The blog mentioned that: In fact, the intuitive definition of access is more specific: It's "the last time I opened, modified, printed, or otherwise performed some sort of purposeful action on the file."
Best regards,
Fangzhou CHEN
Fangzhou CHEN
TechNet Community Support

Membership rules does not work with UDF column name having the max length

Found a bug in OIM .
Membership rules does not work with UDF column name having the maximum length
Steps to Reproduce
1.Create a UDF having max column name length for eg UDF_USR_PERSONAL_SUB_DOMAIN_CO (lable = Personal Code)
2. Create a simple Rule like Personal Code = 7000
3. Assign this Rule as a member ship rule of a Group.
4. Create a user with Personal Code = 7000.
5. User doesnot get the group membership.
Thanks
Suren

Yes , i verified logs as well .
If you just decrease the column name length , w/o making change to any other attributes , it starts working ..
Thanks
Suren

Navigation Rules are not working

Hi
I had written my application in Java Creator.
Now i am shifted to -- NetBeans
Here my Navigation Rules are not working.
I am unable to navigate between pages.
can anyone please help me, why navigations are not working.
and how to write navigation rules in Netbeans.
Thanks
Praveen

Could you explain more about your problem?
-Do you have the navigation rules in your faces-config.xml?
like:
<navigation-rule>
<from-view-id>/page1.jspx</from-view-id>
<navigation-case>
<from-action>#{Controller.toPage2}</from-action>
<from-outcome>success</from-outcome>
<to-view-id>/page2l.jspx</to-view-id>
</navigation-case>
</navigation-rule>

New rule is not working from 'ojaudit' though I use loadSet="Audit"

When customizing new rules in audit framework using the Jdev Extensions API, I used the below content in extension.xml file.
<hooks>
<jdeveloper-hook xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/jdeveloper/1013/extension">
<addins>
<addin loadSet="Audit">oracle.test.Launcher</addin>
</addins>
</jdeveloper-hook>
<feature-hook>
<description>Manages the final static member names.</description>
<optional>true</optional>
</feature-hook>
</hooks>
The new rules created are executing only when I audit from Jdev UI. But these are not executing when I use this new rule in 'ojaudit' at command line.
How can we achieve this?
Is there anything to modify in my extension.xml file?
There is a case where it works both from UI and ojaudit, but it is not working always. That is in my case just observer the above code:
If I dont use loadSet="Audit" in <addin> tag, this rule executes only in UI when auditing but it wont execute when I use 'ojaudit' at command line. And when I use the attribtue loadSet="Audit", only a few times it is executing for 'ojaudit' at cmd line.
Is this inconsistent a bug?
And could you suggest me how the ojaudit works?
And could you point out any documentation of how the ojaudit works? I mean the flow ?
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Madhu

It works fine when I modified the 'loadSet' attribute to 'loadset' where all letters are in small case.
Thank You.

RV016 Protocol Binding & Access Rules do not work on PPTP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for